I’m just going to assume there is a “gay blowjob” exemption to this rule.

Metro:

A school near Manchester has banned its pupils from any physical contact with each other whatsoever, including hugging and play fighting.

Mossley Hollins High School brought in the ‘no contact’ rule stating that ‘no student should ever be touching another student’.

This includes a ban on ‘carrying of other students, cuddling, or play fighting’, including during their breaktime and lunch hour, saying this will ‘not be tolerated’.

The school on Huddersfield Road in Greater Manchester said it had brought in the rule to ‘further improve our positive school culture’.

Oh, so that’s why.

Now I get it.

However, its introduction has proved controversial with many saying it is overly ‘harsh’ by giving such a blanket ban.

And following the media attention, the school has issued a statement defending itself saying that the media should focus on ‘real stories’ such as the maturity of Year 11 pupils during exams.

Drew Duncan, chief executive of the Tame River Educational Trust and the school’s former headteacher, wrote that the policy had been in place for years and had merely been formalised now.

He said that many pupils were struggling with behaviour after years of lockdown and ‘aren’t quite sure how to make friends appropriately or how to respect the personal space of others’.

‘So, all we have done, is turn our 25-years of good practice into an easy-to-follow rule to help our younger students pick up on what our primaries would normally have had the time to show them.’

He said the school was not planning to back down on the policy and ‘will certainly be continuing with this in the building and in movement to lessons as the atmosphere is even more calm, friendly and kind than before’.

But he said: ‘We will be keeping an eye on it in the grounds to see its impact on healthy play and dialogue. So far, we are noticing the difference for the better and we appreciate the many messages from supportive parents.’

Emma Halpin, who left the school in 2019, says ‘nobody seems to be in favour’ of the no contact directive.

She said: ‘I used to go to the school, and I still know people there. Nobody seems to be in favour of it, from what I have seen.

‘A lot of students feel pressured with the rules so far.’

In a regular newsletter posted on the school’s website, the school said the rule was brought it to ensure that students ‘feel safe in school’, have ‘a supportive environment in and outside of lessons’, ‘demonstrate mutual respect and are kind to each other, have ‘positive attitudes towards each other’, and have ‘healthy relationships with their peers’.

The page explaining the new rule said: ‘What does “no contact” actually mean for our students?

‘Always be safe by being careful and showing courtesy. No toy fighting or rough play. Never push or pull others. Keep your hands and feet to yourself.

‘Physical contact and verbal abuse to others are not permitted.

‘No jumping on each other, cuddling and no carrying of each other. No throwing of any objects. No holding places or jumping in line when queuing for lunch. Sit properly on benches and do not overcrowd.’

It continued: ‘This new rule has been made very clear to all of our students so that they all understand. Teaching and support staff have led presentations this week explaining our expectations so that every student understands why we are implementing this rule.’

Wow.

That is… one of the most dehumanizing things I’ve seen yet.

This is actually worse when they told us that they were changing the name of “women” to “biological front hole.” (I don’t actually remember if that was their term or one I made mocking them, but they have changed the name of “women” to all kinds of things – uterus-haver, chest-feeder, birther, etc.)

We’re reminded that people are just animals, actually, and most of their behavior is animal behavior that is dressed up in spooks.  Of course, I’m a Christian, and believe that people have souls, but that’s a small part of humanness. If you are capable of sitting back and watching people as an observer, you can observe that most human behavior is patterned, genetically programmed animal behavior. All mammals touch each other.

Imagine telling dogs not to touch each other.

Kids touch each other more than adults, and Anglos touch each other less than any other group of people in the world except maybe the Japanese, but just imagine if this policy was implemented in your workplace, and you got reported to HR for patting a co-worker on the shoulder.

This is the direction we are going in: all the worst things. Every bad thing. Nothing even connects the bad things together other than that they are bad – anti-nature, anti-God.

Literally “no touching in gay blowjob class.”

If you can think of a really bad thing, it is eventually going to happen, because it is possible. This is a Hell World.

99% of all the problems in the world today come from the fact that men in America and western Europe don’t smack their women.

FACT!

Daily Mail:

The Girl Scouts of the USA have warned parents not to force their daughters to hug relatives at Christmas in case it creates intimacy issues later in life.

In a PSA that’s now been shared by almost 7,000 people on Facebook, they warned not to tell children to hug their aunts and uncles

Doing so, they said, ‘can set the stage for her questioning whether she “owes” another person any type of physical affection when they’ve bought her dinner or done something else seemingly nice for her later in life.’

You know… I’m pretty sure parents force boys to hug this relative or that relative too. How come they don’t get any “intimacy issues”?

The article said that parents don’t need to worry about children who naturally want to show affection to relatives.

I can’t even imagine what it’s like to be this retarded.

But it warned against saying ‘Uncle just got here – go give him a big hug!’ or ‘Auntie gave you that nice toy, go give her a kiss.’

Instead, it said, other forms of greeting – a high-five or an air kiss – can work just fine, but ‘it’s important that she knows she gets to choose which feels most comfortable to her.’

If these skanks really cared about girls not getting raped, they would warn about being around subhumans:

A little more problematic than hugging grandma, don’t you think?

‘The notion of consent may seem very grown-up and like something that doesn’t pertain to children,’ Dr Andrea Bastiani Archibald, the Girl Scouts’ developmental psychologist, is quoted as saying.

‘But the lessons girls learn when they’re young about setting physical boundaries and expecting them to be respected last a lifetime, and can influence how she feels about herself and her body as she gets older.

‘Plus, sadly, we know that some adults prey on children, and teaching your daughter about consent early on can help her understand her rights, know when lines are being crossed, and when to go to you for help.’

I checked this Archibald cunt’s twitter account, and she has two sons. Can you imagine growing up with a mother like this? I probably would’ve ended up in a nuthouse.

The article goes on to state that some women are retarded enough to agree, and some aren’t retarded enough to agree. It’s good that we have the latter, but it’s not enough.

Civilization and sanity are crumbling beneath our feet, and female stupidity is the second greatest cause after the Jew.

What we need is to put these bitches back where they belong.

We need a hero.

Someone to guide us to a better future.

To show us the way.

And I know who that hero is…

Save us, Rapeman!