Hahahaha.

American justice is at it again!

Gigantic corporations have an absolute right to poison you!

You cannot infringe on the rights of corporations to poison you, because that is not who we are in a democracy. It is, quite simply, against our values in a democracy.

The Guardian:

A federal appeals court in the US has killed a ban on plastic containers contaminated with highly toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” found to leach at alarming levels into food, cosmetics, household cleaners, pesticides and other products across the economy.

Houston-based Inhance manufactures an estimated 200m containers annually with a process that creates, among other chemicals, PFOA, a toxic PFAS compound. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in December prohibited Inhance from using the manufacturing process.

But the conservative fifth circuit court of appeals court overturned the ban. The judges did not deny the containers’ health risks, but said the EPA could not regulate the buckets under the statute it used.

The EPA is not allowed to protect the environment.

Unless it is with the intention of changing the weather, then they can do whatever they want to whoever they want and no one can ever stop them.

They can, for example, cripple the trucking industry.

But that’s it.

The rule requires companies to alert the EPA if a new industrial process creates hazardous chemicals. Inhance has produced the containers for decades and argued that its process is not new, so it is not subject to the regulations. The EPA argued that it only became aware that Inhance’s process created PFOA in 2020, so it could be regulated as a new use, but the court disagreed.

“The court did not dispute EPA’s underlying decision that this is a danger to human health, what they did was say it’s not a new use, which I think is wrong … but this case isn’t over by any stretch,” said Kyla Bennett, a former EPA official now with the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (Peer) non-profit, which has intervened in legal proceedings.

PFAS are a class of about 15,000 compounds used to make products resistant to water, stains and heat. They are known as “forever chemicals” because they do not naturally break down, and they have been linked to cancer, high cholesterol, liver disease, kidney disease, fetal complications and other serious health problems.

The EPA said in a statement to the Guardian that it was reviewing the decision.

…

A peer-reviewed study in 2011 found Inhance’s containers leached the toxic compounds into their contents. Bennett and the EPA found in 2020 that PFAS were leaching into pesticides held by containers Inhance produced, and several follow-up studies reconfirmed the problem. Since 2020, Inhance appears to have repeatedly lied to regulators and customers about whether PFAS leached from its containers, and for several years resisted EPA’s demands to submit its process for review.

The most offensive part about the global warming hoax is that we actually do have a real world crisis relating to these chemicals being dumped everywhere and entering our bodies and the bodies of animals.

Think your organic kale is pure? Think again! Explore the shocking reality of toxic PFAS lurking in your greens. Protect your health and your family—it’s time to push for change.#kale #superfood #PFAS pic.twitter.com/pcKZOPO0ZR

— Dr. Joseph Mercola (@mercola) March 22, 2024

Why is it legal to poison people?

We need to get to the bottom of this.

The argument is generally going to be that people are choosing to use these products, but even if you don’t choose to use these products, they still go into your body, through the environment.

Andrew Anglin has called out Tom Woods to explain how it is not a violation of the non-aggression principle to produce these chemicals at all, while knowing that they are going to enter into people’s private property against their will.

CNN:

Premature births are on the rise, yet experts aren’t sure why. Now, researchers have found synthetic chemicals called phthalates used in clear food packaging and personal care products could be a culprit, according to a new study.

Past research has demonstrated that phathalates — known as “everywhere chemicals” because they are so common — are hormone disruptors that can impact how the life-giving placenta functions. This organ is the source of oxygen and nutrients for a developing fetus in the womb.

“Phthalates can also contribute to inflammation that can disrupt the placenta even more and set the steps of preterm labor in motion,” said lead author Dr. Leonardo Trasande, director of environmental pediatrics at NYU Langone Health.

“Studies show the largest association with preterm labor is due to a phthalate found in food packaging called Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, or DEHP,” Trasande said. “In our new study, we found DEHP and three similar chemicals could be responsible for 5% to 10% of all the preterm births in 2018. This could be one of the reasons why preterm births are on the rise.”

The 5% to 10% percentage translated into nearly 57,000 preterm births in the United States during 2018, at a cost to society of nearly $4 billion in that year alone, according to the study, published Tuesday in the journal Lancet Planetary Health.

“This paper focused on the relationship between exposure to individual phthalates and preterm birth. But that’s not how people are exposed to chemicals,” said Alexa Friedman, a senior scientist of toxicology at the Environmental Working Group, or EWG, in an email.

“Every day, they’re often exposed to more than one phthalate from the products they use, so the risk of preterm birth may actually be greater,” said Friedman, who was not involved in the study.

The American Chemistry Council, an industry trade association for US chemical companies, told CNN the report did not establish causation.

Haha.

Okay.

Why are these people not in prison?

“Not all phthalates are the same, and it is not appropriate to group them as a class. The term ‘phthalates’ simply refers to a family of chemicals that happen to be structurally similar, but which are functionally and toxicologically distinct from each other,” a spokesperson for the council’s ’s High Phthalates Panel wrote in an email.

Globally, approximately 8.4 million metric tons of phthalates and other plasticizers are consumed every year, according to European Plasticisers, an industry trade association.

Manufacturers add phthalates to consumer products to make the plastic more flexible and harder to break, primarily in polyvinyl chloride, or PVC, products such as children’s toys.

Phthalates are also found in detergents; vinyl flooring, furniture and shower curtains; automotive plastics; lubricating oils and adhesives; rain and stain-resistant products; clothing and shoes; and scores of personal care products including shampoo, soap, hair spray and nail polish, in which they make fragrances last longer.

Studies have connected phthalates to childhood obesity, asthma, cardiovascular issues, cancer and reproductive problems such as genital malformations and undescended testes in baby boys and low sperm counts and testosterone levels in adult males.

Although these chemicals will be in your body on some level regardless, you can at least try to minimize it by not using the products directly. Try not to use plastic furniture or plastic clothing. Definitely do not use shampoo and soap.

See: Self-Help Sunday: Time to Drop the Soap, Foam Cuck

Definitely, definitely do not use deodorant or perfume.

Do your best to keep them out of your body. If you just don’t use the products directly, you’re going to cut down on something like 90% of the intake.

The remaining 10% is still a disaster, and means that you will probably die of cancer at some point, but hopefully it will be when you’re old.

Consumer Reports found a ‘widespread’ presence of plastics in food despite the health risks. The non-profit group said that 84 out of 85 supermarket foods and fast foods it tested contained phthalates, a chemical used to make plastic more durable https://t.co/0g82Cfszls pic.twitter.com/2vh3vYMUWk

— Reuters (@Reuters) January 4, 2024

If you’re trying to shrink your penis with these chemicals, you’d better get on it quick.

The window is closing in two years, at which point you’re going to have to find something else to shrink your penis with.

To be fair, if you’re looking to shrink your penis with chemicals, there are a whole lot of options.

The Guardian:

New Zealand is banning so-called “forever chemicals” in cosmetics from 2026, in what could be the first example of a country doing so.

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) said it has banned the use of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in cosmetics to protect people and the environment from the chemicals.

PFAS are added to cosmetics to smooth the skin, or to make cosmetic products more durable, spreadable and water resistant.

They are a class of about 14,000 chemicals often used to make products resistant to water, stains and heat and are called “forever chemicals” because they are virtually indestructible.

An increasing international body of evidence is linking PFAS with cancers, birth defects and negative effects on the immune systems of humans and animals. The chemicals have been detected in drinking water sources, sea foam and spray, rain and groundwater, sea ice, and human blood and are found in cosmetics such as shaving cream and lipstick, as well as Teflon pans and pizza boxes.

…

Some states in the US have already proposed legislation to ban or limit PFAS ahead of federal regulations. California was the first major jurisdiction to ban all PFAS in cosmetics, in September 2022, with a transitional period for enforcement after 1 January 2025, while the states of Maine and Minnesota recently passed a law prohibiting products made with intentionally added PFAS chemicals from 2030. The European Union is working on a broader ban on the chemicals.

Once again, Rob Schneider – the funniest man in Hollywood – is right again.

Whaat?!
“Swan’s research finds that these chemicals aren’t just dramatically reducing semen quality, they are also shrinking penis size and volume of the testes.” https://t.co/XbY7KaiVD7

— Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) March 22, 2021

The government of New Zealand was forced to bow to Schneider.

So, they all will.

No one is interested in fixing the problem.

The Guardian:

For decades, it was the secret behind the magic show of homemaking across the US. Applied to a pan, it could keep a fried egg from sticking to the surface. Soaked into a carpet, it could shrug off spills of red wine. Sprayed onto shoes and coats, it could keep the kids dry on a rainy day.

But the most clandestine maneuver of perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, was much less endearing: seeping into the blood and organs of hundreds of millions of people who used products containing the chemical.

Seeping like a mf, fr fr.

Most people who’ve heard of the chemical likely know about it because it was found to be toxic and removed from consumer goods in 2015 after decades of use, leading to modern boasts of “PFOA-free” on product packaging. In recent years, PFOA has also become the target of widespread regulatory action, news media attention and even a Hollywood movie as contaminated drinking water was discovered in hundreds of communities across the country.

While most concerns about the chemical’s health risks have centered on communities where research has linked PFOA to cancer and other serious illnesses, public health researchers say it serves as a klaxon of something more insidious.

PFOA is just one of dozens of modern-day chemicals that are found in the bodies of the majority of Americans, regardless of where they live. Research has also shown that more Americans are facing a growing number of ailments and disorders, from autoimmune disease to developmental disorders such as autism and some cancers. Scientists are increasingly concerned these two truths are linked, and some believe that the American public and lawmakers alike are dangerously unaware of the perils lurking in their veins.

“It’s very hard for people to understand exposure and effects when they can’t see a smoking gun,” said Linda Birnbaum, a former director of the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences.

Sorting out the causes of troubling public health trends is extremely difficult. For example, how much is due to aging demographics, personal behaviors, diagnostic changes or environmental exposures? But in recent years, scientists have accumulated enough data to conclude with confidence that humans face significant health risks from exposure to common commercial chemicals, and that regulations designed to protect them are failing.

“I do think this area has been badly overridden by industry,” said Wendy Wagner, an attorney and professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law who has written about chemical contaminants. “People don’t realize that we actually encourage and even subsidize the production of tens of thousands of chemicals, while imposing essentially no requirements on manufacturers to test their safety. Nor do we ask whether we need the chemical, whether it’s useful, whether there are safer substitutes – or what it’s doing to the environment.”

When to declare a chemical safe or unsafe is critical. Experts say that due to flaws in federal regulation, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is perennially playing catch up. The majority of the 86,000 consumer chemicals registered with the agency have never received vigorous toxicity testing.

The EPA doesn’t dispute that untested chemicals have been approved for use, but told the Examination that “far fewer” than 86,000 chemicals are still used today. The agency further stated that it believes it has made “significant progress” in addressing the risks of chemicals over the past four decades and in recent years has worked to draft a bevy of new rules and actions to address remaining high-priority risks.

…

But the dangers of chemical exposure go far beyond PFOA.

Premature babies in intensive care units appear to have higher amounts of plastics chemicals called phthalates in their bodies, likely from exposure to breathing equipment, according to a 2020 paper authored by Chris Gennings, director of the division of biostatistics at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, and colleagues. Phthalate mixtures, the report noted, can impact “neurobehavioral development”, with other studies finding links to aggression, inattention and rule-breaking behavior in boys from prenatal exposure. Gennings adds that even healthy children face similar risks from plastics chemicals still commonly found in baby bottles.

And studies show even the most cautious parents may not be able to escape the sins of the past.

Over the last 10 years, new research in the field of epigenetics, which studies how behavior and environmental exposures can affect how genes work, has found increasing evidence that harm from chemical exposures may become inherited. The chemicals change how the body operates, passing the changes down through two or three generations, and maybe even more. While the effect is well established in animal studies, researchers are now going about the much more difficult task of studying people and sorting correlation from causation, according to Carrie Breton, an environmental epidemiologist at the University of Southern California who published a review of recent research on epigenetics in 2021.

…

Sixty-one years ago, marine biologist Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring, a book often hailed as revolutionary for its compelling communication of the risks of pesticides and other substances. The book is credited with helping propel a popular movement that led to the creation of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as the federal Clean Water and Clean Air Acts, which have dramatically reduced environmental pollution over the past half-century.

But, experts say, health threats from commercial chemicals remain fundamentally the same. So what went wrong?

Sarah Vogel, senior vice-president for healthy communities at the non-profit Environmental Defense Fund, says US environmental standards have improved in some ways since the publication of Silent Spring, especially in the first few decades after the book was published. Urban waterways like Ohio’s Cuyahoga River aren’t catching on fire anymore. Neighborhoods are no longer being sprayed with dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), which has been linked to breast cancer, hypertension and obesity in the daughters of women exposed to the bug killer. Vogel’s organization and others successfully pushed for a widespread ban of the pesticide in the US in 1972.

Progress on chemicals in consumer products, however, has lagged behind, Vogel said.

…

Vogel says that over the past several decades, advancements in the understanding of the human genome, microbiome and other bodily systems have allowed researchers to begin developing a better picture of these types of non-cancer risks from exposure to even very small amounts of chemicals.

One of the most alarming varieties is “endocrine disruptors”, a moniker given to any substance that interferes with the body’s transmission of hormones – or even mimics them. This causes cascading effects in the body that may be difficult to predict or understand, impacting metabolism, energy levels, reproduction, development and mood. Scientists believe that many “forever chemicals”, including PFOA, operate this way by accumulating in the body and tinkering with its organs and systems.

Birnbaum, the former director of the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, compares the effect to medicines such as birth control pills. Like medicines, commercial chemicals also alter the body’s processes.

“You’re changing the hormonal environment, which has an impact,” Birnbaum said. “The difference between drugs and chemicals that we get exposed to via consumer products is that drugs have to be tested before they go on the market. Chemicals that are in commerce don’t.”

It’s only after it’s way too late that they’re even talking about the issue.

And this is The Guardian.

You won’t see this in The New York Times or The Washington Post.

45% of US tap water contains PFAS, and the government and health authorities don’t give a single f–k about it.

We have multiple major cities with unfathomably toxic water thats full of PFAS, pharmaceutical drugs, heavy metals, fluoride, and countless other obscene toxins, and… pic.twitter.com/UqYA28SU4E

— Inversionism (@Inversionism) August 31, 2023

Are you a mosquito magnet?

A new study found that the soap you use could help attract those pesky insects.

What soaps to avoid and which ones to use to keep mosquitos away.#KOMONews pic.twitter.com/pmieYlrOL4

— Holly Menino (@hollymenino) May 11, 2023

You know the Daily Stormer is an anti-soap website.

We didn’t base this position on nothing.

We based on on pure science.

The Guardian:

Lathering up with soap might seem a reasonable mosquito-evasion strategy on the basis that if they can’t smell you, they can’t bite you.

However, a study suggests that rather than helping you go incognito, soapy fragrances could make you a more attractive target, with mosquitoes favouring the scent of volunteers who washed with three out of four popular soap brands tested.

The scientists behind the research said mosquitoes may be attracted to soap because, when they are not feeding on blood, they supplement their sugar intake with plant nectars.

“The fact we are taking those flowery, fruity smells and putting them on our bodies means that now the same object smells like a flower and a person at the same time,” said Clément Vinauger, who led the work at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. “It would be like waking up and smelling something that was like both coffee and muffins. Very appealing.”

However, the study also noted that the effects of soaps differed somewhat between people, possibly due to interactions between the soaps and each person’s unique odour profile.

Soap has zero benefits, unless you’re a gay faggot who wants to smell like a woman.

We’ve been over this.

Related: 

• Self-Help Sunday: Time to Drop the Soap, Foam Cuck
• Self-Help Sunday: Don’t be a Foam Cuck, End Soap Use Now

The looming threat of mosquitos and their Jewlike behavior is just one more reason to END SOAP.

There are chemicals flooding the entire environment that have all kinds of horrible affects on human beings.

But no one really cares about any of it, and they instead justify it, while going on and on about how carbon is a poisonous gas that changes the weather, which is literally not true at all.

Euronews:

90 per cent of babies are being exposed to highly toxic nappies, according to a report.

The research conducted in France suggests this could lead to threats of grave disease in later life.

An agency called ANSES tested best-selling brands of disposable nappies and found 38 “very severe hazard” chemicals in those sold throughout Europe. Most of the chemicals disrupt hormones, the officials say, which means they are not considered safe.

1,000 nappies are made in Europe every minute. The market is worth €7 billion a year and is dominated by two brands, Pampers (36 per cent) and Huggies (2 per cent).

The study estimates that over 14 million European children could suffer “potentially very severe, variable and latent diseases affecting their quality of life over their lifetime”.

This includes cancers, suspected endocrine (hormone) disruption and even reprotoxic effects (affecting fertility). Children are particularly vulnerable to chemicals, according to the World Health Organisation.

That first hyperlink in the above paragraph leads to an article about how “climate change” is supposedly killing people.

Because even in an article about something that’s actually killing people, they needed to give the cow farts hoax a mention.

They must have a quota or something.

After the research was first published in 2019, ANSES followed up by testing 9 major brands. They found only one of the chemicals still present, formaldehyde, a carcinogen – suggesting that brands had at least responded in some way.

But contamination could return, so the agency asked the EU to strictly limit the chemicals in nappies.

That proposal is being resisted by EU institutions. The bloc was due to protect consumers by passing a law this week, but they missed their legal deadline.

“Every day, parents risk exposing their new born babies to toxic chemicals simply by changing their diapers. It should not be up to parents to know whether the nappies they are using may be toxic or not,” says Maria Arena, Member of the European Parliament Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and campaigner on chemical issues.

“The EU must step up and ban those substances in nappies and ensure a toxic-free environment for all.”

The European Chemicals Agency acknowledges potential risks, saying the chemicals should not be present, but claims the French researchers failed to properly demonstrate a risk to children.

Who knows how much of this whole bizarre “transformation of humanity” phenomenon is due to social factors and how much of it is due to biological factors, but we do know that the biological factors are due to environmental toxins and the process of growing and processing food.

If you were going to spend trillions of dollars trying to fix a problem, it seems like it would be this, rather than some fake problem like coronavirus, global warming, police racism, or democracy in the Ukraine.