homosexual – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Mon, 24 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png homosexual – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 “Russia is a Threat to the Rules-Based Order” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/10/24/russia-is-a-threat-to-the-rules-based-order/ Mon, 24 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000

As I told our service members in Japan, when it comes to America’s national security, one of our defining missions is to uphold the international rules-based order. The work of the United States in the Indo-Pacific is critical to that mission. pic.twitter.com/ZRsu7eta5P

— Vice President Kamala Harris (@VP) September 29, 2022

Many people are very confused by the seemingly nonsensical statement repeated by the American rulers that “Russia is a threat to the rules-based order.” The confusion stems from the fact that this term is ubiquitous, yet remains totally undefined.

If the statement is not actually nonsensical, it is at the very least deeply esoteric, given that the rules in question, if they exist, are a secret. None of the people using this piece of terminology have outlined what the rules are, let alone provided a list of rules.

Before the Ukraine conflict, one might be tempted to suspect that they are referring to the rules laid out by the WTO, United Nations and various other globalist bodies, but that is no longer a valid guess. The United States unilaterally abolished the sanctimony of the WTO and various trade rules with the sanctions on Russia. The US has consistently violated the UN Charter, particularly in relation to Israel and its various dealings in the Middle East, but they are also likely violating it with the claim that Russian-speaking people in the east of the Ukraine – who, if living under Kiev rule, meet the UN definition of “stateless people” – do not have a right to secede from the Ukraine.

There is no possible list of rules that the US subscribes to that they could be expecting Russia to honor. Furthermore: expecting people to guess about what is being referenced by “rules-based order,” when this phrase is repeated so often, is simply outrageous. This is especially true given that the Russians, including Vladimir Putin, are constantly asking for this term to be defined, and the US simply refuses.

This is at the heart of the dilemma in Russia. The US has said that they will fight to the last Ukrainian and the only reason given is “the rules-based order.” Not understanding what it means is not a small thing. Russia has said they are willing to follow a set of rules agreed to at the UN if these rules are fair to all parties, but they were continually blocked from resolving the Ukraine problem after the US-backed 2014 revolution. Russia used all channels connected to the UN and appealed to NATO when attempting to solve the two issues of the Kiev bombings of the Donbass and the militarization of the Ukraine, and they were simply bullied and tricked.

If you look at the way the Minsk Agreements were managed by the US-puppet regime in Kiev, you can see the attitude of the West very clearly. This was an internationally-mediated agreement, which Kiev signed, agreeing that they would stop attacking and murdering people in the Donbass (where at least 15,000 people were killed by the Kiev authorities between 2014 and the end of 2021). Vladimir Zelensky mocked the agreement, and continued to bombard the territory. After the Russian invasion in February, the former president, Petro Poroshenko, came out and publicly stated that he signed the agreement in bad faith with no plan to honor it. He said that the deal “meant nothing,” and was only intended to “buy time” while US/NATO was building up the Ukraine military.

Signing an international agreement, violating it flagrantly, then coming out and saying that you had no plan to honor it in the first place is something that only two other countries in the world could get away with: the US and Israel. Most reasonable people do not believe that a country doing business this way is indicative of a “rules-based order.” When a normal person hears this strange piece of terminology, the first thing they picture is a system of honoring and enforcing international treaties. Surely, a country which signs treaties under false pretexts while planning to violate them when they have the advantage cannot exist in a “rules-based order”?

Progressive YouTuber Jimmy Dore recently said that the US was not following any “rules-based order” when they invaded Iraq and Afghanistan.

This is currently a popular talking point among the progressive left opposed to the US war against Russia, and there is some validity to it. However, it’s not a 1-to-1 comparison, given that the US sought and received permission to invade those two countries from the United Nations. There is a good argument that this process was illegitimate, especially given that the US presented “fixed” intelligence (false information) in their arguments before the UN. Beyond that, there are of course arguments that the UN is itself not a legitimate body, given that they are only capable of enforcing resolutions against the enemies of organized Jewry. However, there was a process there.

The same is true of the US/NATO bombings of Serbia in 1999: they had a UN resolution authorizing military force.

The closest that the US has gotten to that in their war against Russia is moral condemnation, including an October resolution condemning the annexation of Eastern Ukraine territories. About 75% of countries agreed that annexing the territories was morally wrong, with 5 supporting it and 35 abstaining. (Notably, however, both China and India abstained, and those two countries make up nearly 40% of the world population. When you include Russia, Pakistan, and the rest, over 50% of the population of the world refuses to condemn. Votes are not weighted by population, so this doesn’t carry any weight in practical terms, but it is interesting to note.)

A moral condemnation vote, however, is meaningless. The reason that the US has not pushed for a resolution authorizing the use of force is that they could not get it passed. The US has stated outright that they will not seek a UN resolution for further military action against Russia.

I am not against the claim that the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions were “lawless,” but it’s necessary to steelman the opposition here, and point out that there is a system of rules that the US can point to with those wars that does not exist with their war against Russia.

The Rules-Based Order is Gay Anal Sex

I have argued aggressively that these undefined pieces of terminology that are thrown around by the American and American-backed governments and media simply mean “gay anal sex.” Perhaps this comes across as hyperbole, but that is not how I intend it. In my assessment, when we hear the terms “democracy,” “human rights,” “Western values,” or “rules-based order,” the defining quality is so-called “gay rights.” In particular, this applies to the “right” of homosexuals to access children. Though the issue is constantly muddled by the enforcers of gay sex, Russia has not taken any action against homosexuals, save to ban them from propagandizing to children. Homosexuality is not illegal in Russia, nor is it even illegal to run bars or cafes that specifically cater to the “homosexual community.” What is specifically illegal is propagandizing to children. The US has denounced this as a violation of “human rights and democracy.”

In a video recently posted to Twitter by EU official Josep Borrell, we see the rainbow flag draped across the shoulders of a young child.

Russia has previously attempted to join NATO, and they have been at least open to the idea of joining the EU. What they have not been open to is the normalization of allowing homosexuals access to children, and they are therefore disqualified from inclusion in the Western system.

The issue of homosexual child molestation now overlaps significantly with the so-called “tranny agenda,” given that the tranny agenda has allowed the Western establishment to openly identify pre-pubescent children as homosexuals. In Russia, a mere 2% of their population voice support for tranny ideology.

Vladimir Putin has explicitly drawn attention to the tranny agenda when speaking against the Western order, declaring that this will never be accepted in Russia. He denounced the child homosexuality agenda of the US as “satanic.” China has similarly taken a hard stand against homosexuality and feminism, with the Xi Jinping government actually seeking to reduce the already minimal “rights” of homosexuals and women. This is considered by the Jewish elite that run the United States to be unacceptable, and it is why there will never be any peace between these two halves of the world.

Certainly, there are countries that the US cooperates with that do not allow a total homosexual agenda, but these countries are operating under the premise that they will, in the future, allow a total homosexualization of society. Most African states not on the above list of abstainers from the anti-Russian resolution have agreed to legalize homosexuality, having been pressured by the US government. The primary holdouts operating in the “Western system” are the Arab Gulf states. Those countries are in a unique position given their proximity to Israel. However, the US is nonetheless pressuring them to begin to homosexualize their nations, and they have already begun making overtures in that direction.

As these definitions are being crystalized, Saudi Arabia is a bellwether. Under the Donald Trump administration, Prince Salman of the House of Saud was involved deeply with Jared Kushner, agreeing both to the normalization of relations with Israel and an opening up of the social order in his country. He was already moving to allow women’s rights, and was inviting degenerate-type rap musicians to perform in his country, something that would have been unthinkable just a decade ago. However, under the Biden administration, Saudi has begin to back out of this deal, in large part due to the constant condemnations of their “human rights record.” Saudi also has economic concerns, of course, but the US is willing to address those concerns in various ways. The defining variable in the developing break between Saudi and the West is the insistence of the US that Saudi rush through the normalization of gay anal sex in the Kingdom.

The rainbow flag is the symbol of this empire for a reason. Feminism is also a big factor in this global project, but every country that accepts feminism also accepts gay sex, and vice versa. There is also no known country where gay sex was accepted as normative, but there was not a push for the acceptance of child homosexuality.

The defining reality of human existence is not politics or even economics, but the society, and that is the line along which the world has divided into two halves.

Right now, we see the West rushing to establish their moral norms in various third world countries that have not gone full-anal. We have seen various NGOs acting out in Latin America and elsewhere, pushing both abortion and so-called “anal liberation.” This order is still in the process of being defined, at least in the minds of the people, but it is certainly now coming into view, and we are able to use this as the hermeneutic to understand just what it is that these leaders are talking about when they use otherwise inexplicable terminology.

The goal of the “rules-based order” is to remove God and natural morality from human societies, to establish a new order where man is God and morality is defined by governments rather than any higher ideal. Across all cultures, traditional gender roles and a revulsion at homosexuality exist, embedded in the various religious institutions. Pushing homosexuality is a way to directly and necessarily undermine every religious tradition, every system of belief which says that there is some authority higher than man. These ancient institutions, which include not just Christianity but also Islam, Buddhism, Confucianism, and others, are what the Jewish international order is actually at war with, because their vision is a world where no authority exists above the Jews.

]]> Australia: 14 Boys Aged 4-7 Rescued from Homosexuals in Bust of “Biggest Child Exploitation Ring to Date” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/06/05/australia-14-boys-aged-4-7-rescued-from-homosexuals-in-bust-of-biggest-child-exploitation-ring-to-date/ Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000
This headline does not say “boys” or “homosexuals.” A casual observer would simply think it was yet more of this mythical “women abuse” that doesn’t even exist in real life.

All we ever hear about is dumb nonsense to do with “rape culture,” which does not exist.

There is no such thing as “women abuse.”

However, homosexuality is a very real issue, and many children are harmed by homosexuals.

Of course, no one cares because boys are disposable and homosexuals, like women, are to be protected and defended no matter what.

Horrific stories of boys being abused are barely reported and then they disappear.

Look at the headline and then observe how long it takes this article to say “boys,” saying instead “children.”

These were not genderless children. They were boys.

And the men who were abusing them were not generic “abusers.” They were homosexuals.

ABC Australia:

Australian Federal Police (AFP) have arrested nine men in relation to an alleged child abuse network that was filmed, photographed and shared online.

Releasing details of the investigation it said operated across three states, the AFP said 40 charges had been laid.

At least 14 children have been removed from harmful situations.

The investigation began in February after a tip-off from US authorities.

Two men aged in their 20s were arrested on Thursday at Kendall on the New South Wales Mid North Coast and have each been charged with offences relating to the harm and exploitation of children.

The AFP will allege the pair were part of an online network that abused Australian children and recorded the crimes to share with others.

Police said the arrests were linked to alleged criminal activity across New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australia.

Kendall is the same town where toddler William Tyrrell disappeared in 2014.

The name of the kidnapped boy, in paragraph 8, is the first indication that this is a gang of homosexuals.

The two men lived there at the time, but there is no indication they are suspects in that case.

Assistant Commissioner Lesa Gale described the investigation as the biggest and “most horrific” child-exploitation ring uncovered in Australia to date.

She said the investigation involved dozens of specialist operators working around the country who obtained tens of thousands of images.

“Operation Arkstone has shaken some of our most seasoned officers,” Assistant Commissioner Gale said.

“A total of 40 charges have been laid, with three of the men facing life imprisonment.

“It takes a network to break a network and to this end, we want to thank our police partners.

“The victims are getting younger and younger [and] this type of offending is becoming more violent and brazen.”

Five other men were arrested in New South Wales, while the remaining two men were arrested in Queensland and Western Australia.

Assistant Commissioner Gale said all victims were boys, aged between four and seven years old.

And there it is.

In paragraph 18, we finally are told directly that the victims were not generic children – they were boys.

They were our boys, white boys, who are preyed on with impunity across the Western world by homosexuals who are defended by our governments and our media.

This is the biggest “child exploitation ring” in Australian history, according to the cops, and it is a headline nowhere outside of Australia, and even there it is considered less important than the latest “black lives matter” news.

Homosexuality is objectively a much, much bigger threat to society than “racism,” which as we know based on all data, is not even a real problem.

In a real society, where the government actually cared about the people, homosexuality would be at the top of the list of problems, and we would be rescuing boys like these who are being abused by the homosexual rings.

Instead, it isn’t mentioned. Even in a story about the biggest “child abuse ring” in Australian history, we do not see the word “homosexual” and we do not even find out that the victims of the generic “child abusers” are boys until the 18th paragraph.

I have to admit that I’m shocked that this bust even happened. Most of the time, this stuff is swept under the rug, and the homosexuals are given a warning by the cops to be careful and be less public about sharing their homosexual pornography involving children on the internet.

So good on the Australian cops for at least making this bust happen. I’m sure they had to push through an army of female bureaucrats to make this happen.

May God help the boys.

]]> I Renounce My Views on Corona Because a Healthy 43-Year-Old Got It and – Oh, Never Mind. He’s Gay. https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/05/21/i-renounce-my-views-on-corona-because-a-health-43-year-old-got-it-and-oh-never-mind-hes-gay/ Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000

It is absurdly dishonest that they don’t come right out and say this guy is gay, and in fact don’t even say it at all except to mention that he has a boyfriend – in the NINTH PARAGRAPH.

For those who don’t know, something like 99% of people who see a news headline don’t read the story. And of the 1% that does click the headline, 99% don’t read through to the NINTH PARAGRAPH.

This is a complete hoax, meant to disinform the people. Because they simply cannot find real stories of actual healthy people under 65 who experience complications from this disease, they have to find homosexuals and pretend they’re healthy people.

New York Post:

A 43-year-old California man has shared a shocking photo of the toll the coronavirus has taken on his strapping body — turning it into an emaciated shell during his six-week stay in a hospital, according to a report.

Mike Schultz, 43, a nurse from San Francisco with no underlying health conditions, weighed about 190 pounds when he pumped iron almost every day, according to BuzzFeed News.

But after dropping 50 pounds amid the ravages of COVID-19, Schultz decided to share two images to his 30,000 Instagram followers — one taken about a month before he fell ill, the other snapped at a Boston hospital.

“I wanted to show it can happen to anyone. It doesn’t matter if you’re young or old, have pre-existing conditions or not. It can affect you,” Schultz told BuzzFeed.

“I knew what I thought going in [about the coronavirus]. I didn’t think it was as serious as it was until after things started happening,” he said. “I thought I was young enough for it not to affect me, and I know a lot of people think that.”

Schultz said he was exhausted just standing up briefly to take the harrowing photo.

“I was so weak. This was one of the most frustrating parts,” he told the news outlet. “I couldn’t hold my cellphone — it was so heavy. I couldn’t type, because my hands shook so much.”

Schultz, who went to the hospital March 16, also had completely lost track of time, saying: “I thought only a week had gone by.”

He arrived in Boston to visit his boyfriend, Josh Hebblethwaite, 29, on March 14 — a week after they had traveled to Miami Beach for a festival where at least 38 people later tested positive for the illness and three men died, BuzzFeed reported.

Yes, and I think we all know what kind of festival that was in Miami. The three who died probably had full-blown AIDS, so they couldn’t use them for anecdotes about how this virus affects normal people.

Here’s the thing: homosexuals are not “healthy.” Even if they look healthy, they all have immune system problems. That’s what AIDS is, right? Well, even if they aren’t diagnosed with AIDS, they have lesser forms of immune system problems.

Their immune system-weakening behaviors include:

  • Recreational drug use (which I’m sure he was engaged in at that Miami festival)
  • Endless casual sex including “anal sex” (sodomy)
  • Getting STDs constantly and treating them with antibiotics

What’s more, Schultz was obviously also taking steroids, which can have all sorts of negative effects on the body.

The fact that homosexuals have nothing that comes anywhere close to the immune system of a nonhomosexual is not some kind of a secret. They just don’t publish it in the New York Times anymore, for political correctness reasons.

But you can read about it in any medical journal. (Male) homosexuals are in a high-risk category for virtually every conceivable health problem.

What’s more, the homosexuals themselves are talking about how they’re more vulnerable to the coronavirus, specifically.

So, nice try, media: now go see if you can find a healthy heterosexual who experienced these issues.

By the way, I feel like I’ve lost about as much weight as the queer in the photo since this lockdown has been going on. I want to go to the gym and I just can’t hardly even take it anymore. Quarantine the homos (should have been done anyway), and let me in the gym!

]]> Oz: Young Homosexual Bullied to Death After Protesting Drag Queen Story Hour https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/01/15/oz-young-homosexual-bullied-to-death-after-protesting-drag-queen-story-hour/ Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000 Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
January 15, 2020

The news is getting stranger and stranger. At some point, it will get so strange that it will just have to be presented without comment because any attempt to reason out the logic behind the event would render the writer and the reader both insane.

We aren’t quite there yet, but boy are we getting close to the absurdist event horizon.

Daily Mail:

A young conservative student who led a controversial ‘drag queens are not for kids’ protest at a library reading session has died in a suspected suicide.

Wilson Gavin, the president of the University of Queensland’s (UQ) Liberal National Club, was found dead in Brisbane’s south on Monday.

Queensland police and ambulance services were called to an incident at Chelmer about 7.07am.

A state ambulance spokeswoman said the patient was found with critical injuries. Mr Gavin was 21. 

The loss of this young twink is only made sad by the circumstances leading up to his death. Anyone who stands up to satanic drag queen child sex offenders who are protected by shameless badge niggers (the enemy of the people) is a hero in my book.

Seeing as Gavin was only 21, he was no doubt bombarded by Jewish sexual propaganda and harassed by pedophile Boomers his entire life. Looking deep within myself, I can honestly say that I do indeed feel something resembling sympathy for him because I feel sympathy for all Zoomers who were forced to grow up in the most dysgenic conditions known to man. Forget participation trophies; as far as I’m concerned, anyone who makes it to 22 without being molested or forced to suck dick to fit in should be given a medal.

PSA time: 👏 Attention 👏 all 👏 Zoomers 👏! Sucking dick is never OK.

But standing up to drag queen demons is both based and red-pilled. This all may cancel out in the end, but who am I to say, really. You’re going to have to have that conversation with Peter when you’re trying to get into heaven. Maybe he’ll let it slide, idk – my reasoning is that it’s better not to give him any reason to send you to Hell.

But hey, that’s just me.

Mr Gavin was one of about 15 to 20 students who protested at the Drag Storytime event held at the Brisbane Square Library on Sunday afternoon.

Drag queens read stories to children and their parents to teach kids about the fluidity of gender identity and provide them with queer role models.

Footage of the protest shows the demonstrators chanting loudly while one of two performers Diamond Good-Rim tries to get them to stop.

The video featuring Mr Gavin went viral and was slammed by The Veronicas star Jessica Origliasso, who is engaged to transgender bartender Kai Carlton.

I am so totally out of the loop with modern celebrity culture that I have no idea who this disgusting she-wop and her bf (gf?) even are.

If she came out and condemned me though, I’d know that I was doing the right thing and was earning myself a First Class ticket to heaven, that’s for sure.

Before the tragedy emerged, Origliasso described the demonstration as a ‘tone deaf ‘protest’ and fueled by bigotry.’

In the wake of the tragedy, drag queen Diamond Good-Rim issued a statement saying he was deeply saddened by the news.

One more PSA: Kids*, do NOT commit suicide. We need every man we can get in the wars that are coming.

*Note: this PSA does not apply to fags. Jesus hates you, so it doesn’t really matter what you do because the hellfire awaits either way.

Mr Gavin, a gay man, previously made the news in 2017 for opposing same sex marriage.

The then 19-year-old fronted a ‘You Can Say No’ rally, saying: ‘I support what marriage really is and I’m gay.’

He also made media appearances as a spokesman for the Australian Monarchist League.

Writer Satyajeet Marar said: ‘Wilson Gavin was an intelligent, witty, articulate and outspoken young man with a good heart.

‘Despite holding opinions that some people disagree with strongly, he would defend them with conviction.

‘Brave and admirable traits while most of us in this generation spend years obsessing over what others think of us and worrying about whether expressing our opinions will cause people to dislike us.’

Well, if he wasn’t gay literally no one would be expressing their condolences for the young man because he would just be smeared as a Nazi, and psycho-libs would instead be celebrating in the streets that he was dead.

This is known.

Die, white boy!

It is a rare day indeed when a tranny outlives anybody.

But as we enter deeper into the topsy-turvy absurdist event horizon, such news will become more and more common, unfortunately.

]]> Childhood Ruined! Turns Out Mr. Ratburn was a Gay Pedo the Whole Time https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/05/14/childhood-ruined-turns-out-mr-ratburn-was-a-gay-pedo-the-whole-time/ Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Roy Batty and Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 14, 2019

The Gay Mafia will stop at absolutely nothing.

Nothing is safe from their clutches.

I don’t know how we’re going to salvage all these beloved shows after the Reclamation Wars.

Too many shows have been infected with The Gay.

We may have to go full Kaczynski and burn all the media, all the flash drives and the CD-ROMs to prevent the infection from resurfacing after the purges.

The PBS cartoon “Arthur,” which has been airing since 1996 and is based on an even older series of children’s books, has just decided that the teacher, Mr. Ratburn, is a homosexual.

Yikes.

Retconning a character to make it homosexual in order to get publicity and praise is a very Rowling-esque move.

The character’s creator, Marc Brown, has been writing children’s books for his entire life and still works on the show. He’s from Massachusetts and isn’t Jewish.

Something doesn’t add up here.

Since he still participates in the making of these cartoons, I can only assume that he’s recently been infected with The Gay.

On some level, I think I get what the author is doing here. And he should be commended for his public service. He’s sending the people a warning.

Arthur is a third-grader, and given the fact that most homosexuals prey on children, we’re surely not supposed to believe that Mr. Ratburn never tried to fiddle his aardvark pecker.

This revelation certainly makes the cover of “Arthur’s Teacher Trouble” look ominous.

Someone needed to point out that a lot of these teachers working at schools now are homosexuals, closeted or otherwise. And these kids need to know that they’re in a complete and total danger zone when they enter school, and not just from the n-words and the lying hos and the school shooters.

There is no money, no prestige and no sense of cultural duty associated with becoming a teacher anymore. Only dumb women and gay men do it now. Gone are the days of the well-learned and respected schoolteacher who would put dunces in the corner where they belonged, and who would beat the girls with a switch for gossiping.

Even the well-meaning college kids don’t do it anymore. They try Teach For America for a couple of semesters and drop out of the program out of frustration because they just can’t deal with uppity n-words all the time.

The only people left are the kind who like having unfettered access to children.

I’m glad that the good folks at PBS are taking it upon themselves to teach children these valuable life lessons and to keep a wary eye on the pedo at the head of the class, scribbling away on the blackboard.

Kids nowadays are in more danger than they know.

]]> Somalian Congressperson Calls Out Lindsey Graham for Sucking Dick, Right-Wing Media Calls Her a Bigot https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/01/17/somalian-congressperson-calls-out-lindsey-graham-for-sucking-dick-right-wing-media-calls-her-a-bigot/ Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 17, 2019

The new Somalian Congressbulb called out Lindsey Graham as a faggot on Twitter. Not really thinly veiled.

Of course, “right-wing” media is calling her a… homophobe.

Fox News:

A hard-left Democrat from Minnesota is facing backlash and accusations of homophobia after repeating baseless allegations pushed by MSNBC and liberal activists that Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham is somehow being blackmailed into supporting President Trump.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a freshman lawmaker and close ally of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was condemned Tuesday after claiming Graham was “compromised.” Omar was responding to a video that suggested Graham pivoted from being a Trump critic to one of the president’s biggest supporters in the Senate.

“They got to him, he is compromised!” Omar tweeted.

I thought the other one might be better.

That orange site.

I was wrong.

That’s not even a rando writer, it’s John Nolte who is probably the top columnist on the site (since MILO was fired).

I half-expected the top comments to be attacking the author. But now I feel ashamed that I’d hoped for that.

I hate being stuck in the middle of this kosher sandwich.

Because this is the series of events here: the right-wing was against the left-wing’s promotion of homosexualism. Now the left-wing supports Islam, so the right-wing becomes the true defender of disease-ridden faggots.

Leftists were already the real racists, now they’re the real homophobes as well. But you can’t go join the leftists, because it’s all niggers.

You simply cannot escape.

Before Omar said this, an MSNBC host, Stephanie Ruhle, said: “It could be that Donald Trump or somebody knows something pretty extreme about Lindsey Graham. We’re gonna leave it there.”

The chairman of the leftist Super PAC “Democratic Coalition” said the same thing, being slightly more explicit.

He got attacked by right-wing interracial Jewish homo Glenn Greenwald.

nb4 “Glenn Greenwald isn’t right wing” – I dunno man, go look at his positions.

He’s basically a pro-Russian homosexual libertarian who only ever attacks the Democrats.

All of this stuff has gotten weird and confusing and no one knows who precisely is Jewing whom anymore.

I was slightly shocked when the left began going so hard on the tranny thing.

But what is probably more shocking is that the right is now claiming – literally – that Democrats are the real homophobes.

This is exactly how “Democrats are the real racists” became a thing. The right-wing allowed the left-wing to decide what was moral and good, and then tried to best them at their own game – “oh, so racism is bad? Well then, we’re not racists – you are!”

You’re watching them do it again.

Although to be honest, appealing to homosexuals actually makes more sense than trying to appeal to brown people. Just objectively speaking.

But that is only on the superficial level of “these people are more likely to actually vote for you.”

If you step back and look at the larger whole of the issue, you are abandoning your own supporters by trying to force them to accept faggots, which is ultimately going to mean a lesser turnout at elections.

A much more interesting take than “dems r real homophobes” would be “look at how fragile the Democrat Party’s coalition is, they’re going to collapse as homos, Moslems, trannies, women, Jews and black people all start fighting one another.”

Instead, they’re trying to import those problems into their own party.

Because Christianity is just as “homophobic” as Islam. Both religions traditionally had the death penalty for sodomy. I get that a lot of Christians are softer on that issue now, but not the Republican-voting Evangelicals.

The Republican coalition actually makes sense:

  • Christians
  • Libertarians
  • Working class white people hit by immigration
  • Small and medium-sized business owners
  • White nationalists
  • Anime masturbators
  • Gamergate

There is no problem there. We all pretty much get along.

Yes, there are some disagreements, but nothing like the disagreements that are going to being making themselves very clear in the Democrat Party.

You are not going to gain anything by trying to integrate homos.

]]> Full Letter of Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop Who Called Out Anti-Pope Francis as Complicit in Homo Conspiracy https://www.anglinarchive.com/2018/08/30/full-letter-of-carlo-maria-vigano-archbishop-who-called-out-anti-pope-francis-as-complicit-in-homo-conspiracy/ Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 30, 2018

Okay so basically, an Archbishop – a very high-up figure in the Catholic Church – has called out the Anti-Pope Francis and most of the establishment of the Church as using the Church as a gigantic homosexual brothel.

I mentioned the troubles surrounding this issue earlier this week, but feel it is worth reposting the entire letter that the Archbishop wrote.

This is a massive story, and the Jewish media is attempting to bury it. Even while they like to play up smaller scandals, a top guy coming out and confirming that the pro-immigrant, pro-faggot, pro-abortion Pope is a part of a gigantic homosexual conspiracy is something they do not want.

A lot of Catholics don’t even know about this. It was published on the 22nd, and I only recently looked into it.

This is names, places – all of it. It is enough to bring the Pope to the Hague as an international anal war criminal.

The Pope has officially stated that he is refusing to give a statement on this. I have no idea what is going to happen – it is just a matter of whether or not the media is able to successfully bury it.

Please share this letter with your Catholic friends.

Full text follows.

 TESTIMONY

by
His Excellency Carlo Maria Viganò
Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana
Apostolic Nuncio

In this tragic moment for the Church in various parts of the world — the United States, Chile, Honduras, Australia, etc. — bishops have a very grave responsibility. I am thinking in particular of the United States of America, where I was sent as Apostolic Nuncio by Pope Benedict XVI on October 19, 2011, the memorial feast of the First North American Martyrs. The Bishops of the United States are called, and I with them, to follow the example of these first martyrs who brought the Gospel to the lands of America, to be credible witnesses of the immeasurable love of Christ, the Way, the Truth and the Life.

Bishops and priests, abusing their authority, have committed horrendous crimes to the detriment of their faithful, minors, innocent victims, and young men eager to offer their lives to the Church, or by their silence have not prevented that such crimes continue to be perpetrated.

To restore the beauty of holiness to the face of the Bride of Christ, which is terribly disfigured by so many abominable crimes, and if we truly want to free the Church from the fetid swamp into which she has fallen, we must have the courage to tear down the culture of secrecy and publicly confess the truths we have kept hidden. We must tear down the conspiracy of silence with which bishops and priests have protected themselves at the expense of their faithful, a conspiracy of silence that in the eyes of the world risks making the Church look like a sect, a conspiracy of silence not so dissimilar from the one that prevails in the mafia. “Whatever you have said in the dark … shall be proclaimed from the housetops” (Lk. 12:3).

I had always believed and hoped that the hierarchy of the Church could find within itself the spiritual resources and strength to tell the whole truth, to amend and to renew itself. That is why, even though I had repeatedly been asked to do so, I always avoided making statements to the media, even when it would have been my right to do so, in order to defend myself against the calumnies published about me, even by high-ranking prelates of the Roman Curia. But now that the corruption has reached the very top of the Church’s hierarchy, my conscience dictates that I reveal those truths regarding the heart-breaking case of the Archbishop Emeritus of Washington, D.C., Theodore McCarrick, which I came to know in the course of the duties entrusted to me by St. John Paul II, as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, from 1998 to 2009, and by Pope Benedict XVI, as Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, from October 19, 2011 until end of May 2016.

As Delegate for Pontifical Representations in the Secretariat of State, my responsibilities were not limited to the Apostolic Nunciatures, but also included the staff of the Roman Curia (hires, promotions, informational processes on candidates to the episcopate, etc.) and the examination of delicate cases, including those regarding cardinals and bishops, that were entrusted to the Delegate by the Cardinal Secretary of State or by the Substitute of the Secretariat of State.

To dispel suspicions insinuated in several recent articles, I will immediately say that the Apostolic Nuncios in the United States, Gabriel Montalvo and Pietro Sambi, both prematurely deceased, did not fail to inform the Holy See immediately, as soon as they learned of Archbishop McCarrick’s gravely immoral behavior with seminarians and priests. Indeed, according to what Nuncio Pietro Sambi wrote, Father Boniface Ramsey, O.P.’s letter, dated November 22, 2000, was written at the request of the late Nuncio Montalvo. In the letter, Father Ramsey, who had been a professor at the diocesan seminary in Newark from the end of the ’80s until 1996, affirms that there was a recurring rumor in the seminary that the Archbishop “shared his bed with seminarians,” inviting five at a time to spend the weekend with him at his beach house. And he added that he knew a certain number of seminarians, some of whom were later ordained priests for the Archdiocese of Newark, who had been invited to this beach house and had shared a bed with the Archbishop.

The office that I held at the time was not informed of any measure taken by the Holy See after those charges were brought by Nuncio Montalvo at the end of 2000, when Cardinal Angelo Sodano was Secretary of State.

Likewise, Nuncio Sambi transmitted to the Cardinal Secretary of State, Tarcisio Bertone, an Indictment Memorandum against McCarrick by the priest Gregory Littleton of the diocese of Charlotte, who was reduced to the lay state for a violation of minors, together with two documents from the same Littleton, in which he recounted his tragic story of sexual abuse by the then-Archbishop of Newark and several other priests and seminarians. The Nuncio added that Littleton had already forwarded his Memorandum to about twenty people, including civil and ecclesiastical judicial authorities, police and lawyers, in June 2006, and that it was therefore very likely that the news would soon be made public. He therefore called for a prompt intervention by the Holy See.

In writing up a memo[1] on these documents that were entrusted to me, as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, on December 6, 2006, I wrote to my superiors, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone and the Substitute Leonardo Sandri, that the facts attributed to McCarrick by Littleton were of such gravity and vileness as to provoke bewilderment, a sense of disgust, deep sorrow and bitterness in the reader, and that they constituted the crimes of seducing, requesting depraved acts of seminarians and priests, repeatedly and simultaneously with several people, derision of a young seminarian who tried to resist the Archbishop’s seductions in the presence of two other priests, absolution of the accomplices in these depraved acts, sacrilegious celebration of the Eucharist with the same priests after committing such acts.

In my memo, which I delivered on that same December 6, 2006 to my direct superior, the Substitute Leonardo Sandri, I proposed the following considerations and course of action to my superiors:

  • Given that it seemed a new scandal of particular gravity, as it regarded a cardinal, was going to be added to the many scandals for the Church in the United States,
  •  and that, since this matter had to do with a cardinal, and according to can. 1405 § 1, No. 2˚, “ipsius Romani Pontificis dumtaxat ius est iudicandi”;
  • I proposed that an exemplary measure be taken against the Cardinal that could have a medicinal function, to prevent future abuses against innocent victims and alleviate the very serious scandal for the faithful, who despite everything continued to love and believe in the Church.

I added that it would be salutary if, for once, ecclesiastical authority would intervene before the civil authorities and, if possible, before the scandal had broken out in the press. This could have restored some dignity to a Church so sorely tried and humiliated by so many abominable acts on the part of some pastors. If this were done, the civil authority would no longer have to judge a cardinal, but a pastor with whom the Church had already taken appropriate measures to prevent the cardinal from abusing his authority and continuing to destroy innocent victims.

My memo of December 6, 2006 was kept by my superiors, and was never returned to me with any actual decision by the superiors on this matter.

Subsequently, around April 21-23, 2008, the Statement for Pope Benedict XVI about the pattern of sexual abuse crisis in the United States, by Richard Sipe, was published on the internet, at richardsipe.com. On April 24, it was passed on by the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal William Levada, to the Cardinal Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone. It was delivered to me one month later, on May 24, 2008.

The following day, I delivered a new memo to the new Substitute, Fernando Filoni, which included my previous one of December 6, 2006. In it, I summarized Richard Sipe’s document, which ended with this respectful and heartfelt appeal to Pope Benedict XVI: “I approach Your Holiness with due reverence, but with the same intensity that motivated Peter Damian to lay out before your predecessor, Pope Leo IX, a description of the condition of the clergy during his time. The problems he spoke of are similar and as great now in the United States as they were then in Rome. If Your Holiness requests, I will personally submit to you documentation of that about which I have spoken.”

I ended my memo by repeating to my superiors that I thought it was necessary to intervene as soon as possible by removing the cardinal’s hat from Cardinal McCarrick and that he should be subjected to the sanctions established by the Code of Canon Law, which also provide for reduction to the lay state.

This second memo of mine was also never returned to the Personnel Office, and I was greatly dismayed at my superiors for the inconceivable absence of any measure against the Cardinal, and for the continuing lack of any communication with me since my first memo in December 2006.

But finally I learned with certainty, through Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, then-Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, that Richard Sipe’s courageous and meritorious Statement had had the desired result. Pope Benedict had imposed on Cardinal McCarrick sanctions similar to those now imposed on him by Pope Francis: the Cardinal was to leave the seminary where he was living, he was forbidden to celebrate [Mass] in public, to participate in public meetings, to give lectures, to travel, with the obligation of dedicating himself to a life of prayer and penance.

I do not know when Pope Benedict took these measures against McCarrick, whether in 2009 or 2010, because in the meantime I had been transferred to the Governorate of Vatican City State, just as I do not know who was responsible for this incredible delay. I certainly do not believe it was Pope Benedict, who as Cardinal had repeatedly denounced the corruption present in the Church, and in the first months of his pontificate had already taken a firm stand against the admission into seminary of young men with deep homosexual tendencies. I believe it was due to the Pope’s first collaborator at the time, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who notoriously favored promoting homosexuals into positions of responsibility, and was accustomed to managing the information he thought appropriate to convey to the Pope.

In any case, what is certain is that Pope Benedict imposed the above canonical sanctions on McCarrick and that they were communicated to him by the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, Pietro Sambi. Monsignor Jean-François Lantheaume, then first Counsellor of the Nunciature in Washington and Chargé d’Affaires a.i. after the unexpected death of Nuncio Sambi in Baltimore, told me when I arrived in Washington — and he is ready to testify to it— about a stormy conversation, lasting over an hour, that Nuncio Sambi had with Cardinal McCarrick whom he had summoned to the Nunciature. Monsignor Lantheaume told me that “the Nuncio’s voice could be heard all the way out in the corridor.”

Pope Benedict’s same dispositions were then also communicated to me by the new Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Cardinal Marc Ouellet, in November 2011, in a conversation before my departure for Washington, and were included among the instructions of the same Congregation to the new Nuncio.

In turn, I repeated them to Cardinal McCarrick at my first meeting with him at the Nunciature. The Cardinal, muttering in a barely comprehensible way, admitted that he had perhaps made the mistake of sleeping in the same bed with some seminarians at his beach house, but he said this as if it had no importance.

The faithful insistently wonder how it was possible for him to be appointed to Washington, and as Cardinal, and they have every right to know who knew, and who covered up his grave misdeeds. It is therefore my duty to reveal what I know about this, beginning with the Roman Curia.

Cardinal Angelo Sodano was Secretary of State until September 2006: all information was communicated to him. In November 2000, Nunzio Montalvo sent him his report, passing on to him the aforementioned letter from Father Boniface Ramsey in which he denounced the serious abuses committed by McCarrick.

It is known that Sodano tried to cover up the Father Maciel scandal to the end. He even removed the Nuncio in Mexico City, Justo Mullor, who refused to be an accomplice in his scheme to cover Maciel, and in his place appointed Sandri, then-Nuncio to Venezuela, who was willing to collaborate in the cover-up. Sodano even went so far as to issue a statement to the Vatican press office in which a falsehood was affirmed, that is, that Pope Benedict had decided that the Maciel case should be considered closed. Benedict reacted, despite Sodano’s strenuous defense, and Maciel was found guilty and irrevocably condemned.

Was McCarrick’s appointment to Washington and as Cardinal the work of Sodano, when John Paul II was already very ill? We are not given to know. However, it is legitimate to think so, but I do not think he was the only one responsible for this. McCarrick frequently went to Rome and made friends everywhere, at all levels of the Curia. If Sodano had protected Maciel, as seems certain, there is no reason why he wouldn’t have done so for McCarrick, who according to many had the financial means to influence decisions. His nomination to Washington was opposed by then-Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re. At the Nunciature in Washington there is a note, written in his hand, in which Cardinal Re disassociates himself from the appointment and states that McCarrick was 14th on the list for Washington.

Nuncio Sambi’s report, with all the attachments, was sent to Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, as Secretary of State. My two above-mentioned memos of December 6, 2006 and May 25, 2008, were also presumably handed over to him by the Substitute. As already mentioned, the Cardinal had no difficulty in insistently presenting for the episcopate candidates known to be active homosexuals — I cite only the well-known case of Vincenzo de Mauro, who was appointed Archbishop-Bishop of Vigevano and later removed because he was undermining his seminarians — and in filtering and manipulating the information he conveyed to Pope Benedict.

Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the current Secretary of State, was also complicit in covering up the misdeeds of McCarrick who had, after the election of Pope Francis, boasted openly of his travels and missions to various continents. In April 2014, the Washington Times had a front page report on McCarrick’s trip to the Central African Republic, and on behalf of the State Department no less. As Nuncio to Washington, I wrote to Cardinal Parolin asking him if the sanctions imposed on McCarrick by Pope Benedict were still valid. Ça va sans dire that my letter never received any reply!

The same can be said for Cardinal William Levada, former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, for Cardinals Marc Ouellet, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Lorenzo Baldisseri, former Secretary of the same Congregation for Bishops, and Archbishop Ilson de Jesus Montanari, current Secretary of the same Congregation. They were all aware by reason of their office of the sanctions imposed by Pope Benedict on McCarrick.

Cardinals Leonardo Sandri, Fernando Filoni and Angelo Becciu, as Substitutes of the Secretariat of State, knew in every detail the situation regarding Cardinal McCarrick.

Nor could Cardinals Giovanni Lajolo and Dominique Mamberti have failed to know. As Secretaries for Relations with States, they participated several times a week in collegial meetings with the Secretary of State.

As far as the Roman Curia is concerned, for the moment I will stop here, even if the names of other prelates in the Vatican are well known, even some very close to Pope Francis, such as Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio and Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, who belong to the homosexual current in favor of subverting Catholic doctrine on homosexuality, a current already denounced in 1986 by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, then-Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in the Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons. Cardinals Edwin Frederick O’Brien and Renato Raffaele Martino also belong to the same current, albeit with a different ideology. Others belonging to this current even reside at the Domus Sanctae Marthae.

Now to the United States. Obviously, the first to have been informed of the measures taken by Pope Benedict was McCarrick’s successor in Washington See, Cardinal Donald Wuerl, whose situation is now completely compromised by the recent revelations regarding his behavior as Bishop of Pittsburgh.

It is absolutely unthinkable that Nunzio Sambi, who was an extremely responsible person, loyal, direct and explicit in his way of being (a true son of Romagna) did not speak to him about it. In any case, I myself brought up the subject with Cardinal Wuerl on several occasions, and I certainly didn’t need to go into detail because it was immediately clear to me that he was fully aware of it. I also remember in particular the fact that I had to draw his attention to it, because I realized that in an archdiocesan publication, on the back cover in color, there was an announcement inviting young men who thought they had a vocation to the priesthood to a meeting with Cardinal McCarrick. I immediately phoned Cardinal Wuerl, who expressed his surprise to me, telling me that he knew nothing about that announcement and that he would cancel it. If, as he now continues to state, he knew nothing of the abuses committed by McCarrick and the measures taken by Pope Benedict, how can his answer be explained?

His recent statements that he knew nothing about it, even though at first he cunningly referred to compensation for the two victims, are absolutely laughable. The Cardinal lies shamelessly and prevails upon his Chancellor, Monsignor Antonicelli, to lie as well.

Cardinal Wuerl also clearly lied on another occasion. Following a morally unacceptable event authorized by the academic authorities of Georgetown University, I brought it to the attention of its President, Dr. John DeGioia, sending him two subsequent letters. Before forwarding them to the addressee, so as to handle things properly, I personally gave a copy of them to the Cardinal with an accompanying letter I had written. The Cardinal told me that he knew nothing about it. However, he failed to acknowledge receipt of my two letters, contrary to what he customarily did. I subsequently learned that the event at Georgetown had taken place for seven years. But the Cardinal knew nothing about it!

Cardinal Wuerl, well aware of the continuous abuses committed by Cardinal McCarrick and the sanctions imposed on him by Pope Benedict, transgressing the Pope’s order, also allowed him to reside at a seminary in Washington D.C. In doing so, he put other seminarians at risk.

Bishop Paul Bootkoski, emeritus of Metuchen, and Archbishop John Myers, emeritus of Newark, covered up the abuses committed by McCarrick in their respective dioceses and compensated two of his victims. They cannot deny it and they must be interrogated in order to reveal every circumstance and all responsibility regarding this matter.

Cardinal Kevin Farrell, who was recently interviewed by the media, also said that he didn’t have the slightest idea about the abuses committed by McCarrick. Given his tenure in Washington, Dallas and now Rome, I think no one can honestly believe him. I don’t know if he was ever asked if he knew about Maciel’s crimes. If he were to deny this, would anybody believe him given that he occupied positions of responsibility as a member of the Legionaries of Christ?

Regarding Cardinal Sean O’Malley, I would simply say that his latest statements on the McCarrick case are disconcerting, and have totally obscured his transparency and credibility.

* * *

My conscience requires me also to reveal facts that I have experienced personally, concerning Pope Francis, that have a dramatic significance, which as Bishop, sharing the collegial responsibility of all the bishops for the universal Church, do not allow me to remain silent, and that I state here, ready to reaffirm them under oath by calling on God as my witness.

In the last months of his pontificate, Pope Benedict XVI had convened a meeting of all the apostolic nuncios in Rome, as Paul VI and St. John Paul II had done on several occasions. The date set for the audience with the Pope was Friday, June 21, 2013. Pope Francis kept this commitment made by his predecessor. Of course I also came to Rome from Washington. It was my first meeting with the new Pope elected only three months prior, after the resignation of Pope Benedict.

On the morning of Thursday, June 20, 2013, I went to the Domus Sanctae Marthae, to join my colleagues who were staying there. As soon as I entered the hall I met Cardinal McCarrick, who wore the red-trimmed cassock. I greeted him respectfully as I had always done. He immediately said to me, in a tone somewhere between ambiguous and triumphant: “The Pope received me yesterday, tomorrow I am going to China.”

At the time I knew nothing of his long friendship with Cardinal Bergoglio and of the important part he had played in his recent election, as McCarrick himself would later reveal in a lecture at Villanova University and in an interview with the National Catholic Reporter. Nor had I ever thought of the fact that he had participated in the preliminary meetings of the recent conclave, and of the role he had been able to have as a cardinal elector in the 2005 conclave. Therefore I did not immediately grasp the meaning of the encrypted message that McCarrick had communicated to me, but that would become clear to me in the days immediately following.

The next day the audience with Pope Francis took place. After his address, which was partly read and partly delivered off the cuff, the Pope wished to greet all the nuncios one by one. In single file, I remember that I was among the last. When it was my turn, I just had time to say to him, “I am the Nuncio to the United States.” He immediately assailed me with a tone of reproach, using these words: “The Bishops in the United States must not be ideologized! They must be shepherds!”Of course I was not in a position to ask for explanations about the meaning of his words and the aggressive way in which he had upbraided me. I had in my hand a book in Portuguese that Cardinal O’Malley had sent me for the Pope a few days earlier, telling me “so he could go over his Portuguese before going to Rio for World Youth Day.” I handed it to him immediately, and so freed myself from that extremely disconcerting and embarrassing situation.

At the end of the audience the Pope announced: “Those of you who are still in Rome next Sunday are invited to concelebrate with me at the Domus Sanctae Marthae.” I naturally thought of staying on to clarify as soon as possible what the Pope intended to tell me.

On Sunday June 23, before the concelebration with the Pope, I asked Monsignor Ricca, who as the person in charge of the house helped us put on the vestments, if he could ask the Pope if he could receive me sometime in the following week. How could I have returned to Washington without having clarified what the Pope wanted of me? At the end of Mass, while the Pope was greeting the few lay people present, Monsignor Fabian Pedacchio, his Argentine secretary, came to me and said: “The Pope told me to ask if you are free now!” Naturally, I replied that I was at the Pope’s disposal and that I thanked him for receiving me immediately. The Pope took me to the first floor in his apartment and said: “We have 40 minutes before the Angelus.”

I began the conversation, asking the Pope what he intended to say to me with the words he had addressed to me when I greeted him the previous Friday. And the Pope, in a very different, friendly, almost affectionate tone, said to me: “Yes, the Bishops in the United States must not be ideologized, they must not be right-wing like the Archbishop of Philadelphia, (the Pope did not give me the name of the Archbishop) they must be shepherds; and they must not be left-wing — and he added, raising both arms — and when I say left-wing I mean homosexual.” Of course, the logic of the correlation between being left-wing and being homosexual escaped me, but I added nothing else.

Immediately after, the Pope asked me in a deceitful way: “What is Cardinal McCarrick like?”  I answered him with complete frankness and, if you want, with great naiveté: “Holy Father, I don’t know if you know Cardinal McCarrick, but if you ask the Congregation for Bishops there is a dossier this thick about him. He corrupted generations of seminarians and priests and Pope Benedict ordered him to withdraw to a life of prayer and penance.” The Pope did not make the slightest comment about those very grave words of mine and did not show any expression of surprise on his face, as if he had already known the matter for some time, and he immediately changed the subject. But then, what was the Pope’s purpose in asking me that question: “What is Cardinal McCarrick like?” He clearly wanted to find out if I was an ally of McCarrick or not.

Back in Washington everything became very clear to me, thanks also to a new event that occurred only a few days after my meeting with Pope Francis. When the new Bishop Mark Seitz took possession of the Diocese of El Paso on July 9, 2013, I sent the first Counsellor, Monsignor Jean-François Lantheaume, while I went to Dallas that same day for an international meeting on Bioethics. When he got back, Monsignor Lantheaume told me that in El Paso he had met Cardinal McCarrick who, taking him aside, told him almost the same words that the Pope had said to me in Rome: “the Bishops in the United States must not be ideologized, they must not be right-wing, they must be shepherds….” I was astounded! It was therefore clear that the words of reproach that Pope Francis had addressed to me on June 21, 2013 had been put into his mouth the day before by Cardinal McCarrick. Also the Pope’s mention “not like the Archbishop of Philadelphia” could be traced to McCarrick, because there had been a strong disagreement between the two of them about the admission to Communion of pro-abortion politicians. In his communication to the bishops, McCarrick had manipulated a letter of then-Cardinal Ratzinger who prohibited giving them Communion. Indeed, I also knew how certain Cardinals such as Mahony, Levada and Wuerl, were closely linked to McCarrick; they had opposed the most recent appointments made by Pope Benedict, for important posts such as Philadelphia, Baltimore, Denver and San Francisco.

Not happy with the trap he had set for me on June 23, 2013, when he asked me about McCarrick, only a few months later, in the audience he granted me on October 10, 2013, Pope Francis set a second one for me, this time concerning a second of his protégés, Cardinal Donald Wuerl. He asked me: “What is Cardinal Wuerl like, is he good or bad?” I replied, “Holy Father, I will not tell you if he is good or bad, but I will tell you two facts.” They are the ones I have already mentioned above, which concern Wuerl’s pastoral carelessness regarding the aberrant deviations at Georgetown University and the invitation by the Archdiocese of Washington to young aspirants to the priesthood to a meeting with McCarrick! Once again the Pope did not show any reaction.

It was also clear that, from the time of Pope Francis’s election, McCarrick, now free from all constraints, had felt free to travel continuously, to give lectures and interviews. In a team effort with Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga, he had become the kingmaker for appointments in the Curia and the United States, and the most listened to advisor in the Vatican for relations with the Obama administration. This is how one explains that, as members of the Congregation for Bishops, the Pope replaced Cardinal Burke with Wuerl and immediately appointed Cupich, who was promptly made a cardinal. With these appointments the Nunciature in Washington was now out of the picture in the appointment of bishops. In addition, he appointed the Brazilian Ilson de Jesus Montanari — the great friend of his private Argentine secretary Fabian Pedacchio — as Secretary of the same Congregation for Bishops and Secretary of the College of Cardinals, promoting him in one single leap from a simple official of that department to Archbishop Secretary. Something unprecedented for such an important position!

The appointments of Blase Cupich to Chicago and Joseph W. Tobin to Newark were orchestrated by McCarrick, Maradiaga and Wuerl, united by a wicked pact of abuses by the first, and at least of coverup of abuses by the other two. Their names were not among those presented by the Nunciature for Chicago and Newark.

Regarding Cupich, one cannot fail to note his ostentatious arrogance, and the insolence with which he denies the evidence that is now obvious to all: that 80% of the abuses found were committed against young adults by homosexuals who were in a relationship of authority over their victims.

During the speech he gave when he took possession of the Chicago See, at which I was present as a representative of the Pope, Cupich quipped that one certainly should not expect the new Archbishop to walk on water. Perhaps it would be enough for him to be able to remain with his feet on the ground and not try to turn reality upside-down, blinded by his pro-gay ideology, as he stated in a recent interview with America Magazine. Extolling his particular expertise in the matter, having been President of the Committee on Protection of Children and Young People of the USCCB, he asserted that the main problem in the crisis of sexual abuse by clergy is not homosexuality, and that affirming this is only a way of diverting attention from the real problem which is clericalism. In support of this thesis, Cupich “oddly” made reference to the results of research carried out at the height of the sexual abuse of minors crisis in the early 2000s, while he “candidly” ignored that the results of that investigation were totally denied by the subsequent Independent Reports by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in 2004 and 2011, which concluded that, in cases of sexual abuse, 81% of the victims were male. In fact, Father Hans Zollner, S.J., Vice-Rector of the Pontifical Gregorian University, President of the Centre for Child Protection, and Member of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, recently told the newspaper La Stampa that “in most cases it is a question of homosexual abuse.”

The appointment of McElroy in San Diego was also orchestrated from above, with an encrypted peremptory order to me as Nuncio, by Cardinal Parolin: “Reserve the See of San Diego for McElroy.” McElroy was also well aware of McCarrick’s abuses, as can be seen from a letter sent to him by Richard Sipe on July 28, 2016.

These characters are closely associated with individuals belonging in particular to the deviated wing of the Society of Jesus, unfortunately today a majority, which had already been a cause of serious concern to Paul VI and subsequent pontiffs. We need only consider Father Robert Drinan, S.J., who was elected four times to the House of Representatives, and was a staunch supporter of abortion; or Father Vincent O’Keefe, S.J., one of the principal promoters of The Land O’Lakes Statement of 1967, which seriously compromised the Catholic identity of universities and colleges in the United States. It should be noted that McCarrick, then President of the Catholic University of Puerto Rico, also participated in that inauspicious undertaking which was so harmful to the formation of the consciences of American youth, closely associated as it was with the deviated wing of the Jesuits.

Father James Martin, S.J., acclaimed by the people mentioned above, in particular Cupich, Tobin, Farrell and McElroy, appointed Consultor of the Secretariat for Communications, well-known activist who promotes the LGBT agenda, chosen to corrupt the young people who will soon gather in Dublin for the World Meeting of Families, is nothing but a sad recent example of that deviated wing of the Society of Jesus.

Pope Francis has repeatedly asked for total transparency in the Church and for bishops and faithful to act with parrhesia. The faithful throughout the world also demand this of him in an exemplary manner.  He must honestly state when he first learned about the crimes committed by McCarrick, who abused his authority with seminarians and priests.

In any case, the Pope learned about it from me on June 23, 2013 and continued to cover for him. He did not take into account the sanctions that Pope Benedict had imposed on him and made him his trusted counselor along with Maradiaga.

The latter [Maradiaga] is so confident of the Pope’s protection that he can dismiss as “gossip” the heartfelt appeals of dozens of his seminarians, who found the courage to write to him after one of them tried to commit suicide over homosexual abuse in the seminary.

By now the faithful have well understood Maradiaga’s strategy: insult the victims to save himself, lie to the bitter end to cover up a chasm of abuses of power, of mismanagement in the administration of Church property, and of financial disasters even against close friends, as in the case of the Ambassador of Honduras Alejandro Valladares, former Dean of the Diplomatic Corps to the Holy See.

In the case of the former Auxiliary Bishop Juan José Pineda, after the article published in the [Italian] weekly L’Espresso last February, Maradiaga stated in the newspaper Avvenire: “It was my auxiliary bishop Pineda who asked for the visitation, so as to ‘clear’ his name after being subjected to much slander.” Now, regarding Pineda the only thing that has been made public is that his resignation has simply been accepted, thus making any possible responsibility of his and Maradiaga vanish into nowhere.

In the name of the transparency so hailed by the Pope, the report that the Visitator, Argentine bishop Alcides Casaretto, delivered more than a year ago only and directly to the Pope, must be made public.

Finally, the recent appointment as Substitute of Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra is also connected with Honduras, that is, with Maradiaga. From 2003 to 2007 Peña Parra worked as Counsellor at the Tegucigalpa Nunciature. As Delegate for Pontifical Representations I received worrisome information about him.

In Honduras, a scandal as huge as the one in Chile is about to be repeated. The Pope defends his man, Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga, to the bitter end, as he had done in Chile with Bishop Juan de la Cruz Barros, whom he himself had appointed Bishop of Osorno against the advice of the Chilean Bishops. First he insulted the abuse victims. Then, only when he was forced by the media, and a revolt by the Chilean victims and faithful, did he recognize his error and apologize, while stating that he had been misinformed, causing a disastrous situation for the Church in Chile, but continuing to protect the two Chilean Cardinals Errazuriz and Ezzati.

Even in the tragic affair of McCarrick, Pope Francis’s behavior was no different. He knew from at least June 23, 2013 that McCarrick was a serial predator. Although he knew that he was a corrupt man, he covered for him to the bitter end; indeed, he made McCarrick’s advice his own, which was certainly not inspired by sound intentions and for love of the Church. It was only when he was forced by the report of the abuse of a minor, again on the basis of media attention, that he took action [regarding McCarrick] to save his image in the media.

Now in the United States a chorus of voices is rising especially from the lay faithful, and has recently been joined by several bishops and priests, asking that all those who, by their silence, covered up McCarrick’s criminal behavior, or who used him to advance their career or promote their intentions, ambitions and power in the Church, should resign.

But this will not be enough to heal the situation of extremely grave immoral behavior by the clergy: bishops and priests. A time of conversion and penance must be proclaimed. The virtue of chastity must be recovered in the clergy and in seminaries. Corruption in the misuse of the Church’s resources and of the offerings of the faithful must be fought against. The seriousness of homosexual behavior must be denounced. The homosexual networks present in the Church must be eradicated, as Janet Smith, Professor of Moral Theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, recently wrote.  “The problem of clergy abuse,” she wrote, “cannot be resolved simply by the resignation of some bishops, and even less so by bureaucratic directives. The deeper problem lies in homosexual networks within the clergy which must be eradicated.” These homosexual networks, which are now widespread in many dioceses, seminaries, religious orders, etc., act under the concealment of secrecy and lies with the power of octopus tentacles, and strangle innocent victims and priestly vocations, and are strangling the entire Church.

I implore everyone, especially Bishops, to speak up in order to defeat this conspiracy of silence that is so widespread, and to report the cases of abuse they know about to the media and civil authorities.

Let us heed the most powerful message that St. John Paul II left us as an inheritance:Do not be afraid! Do not be afraid!

In his 2008 homily on the Feast of the Epiphany, Pope Benedict reminded us that the Father’s plan of salvation had been fully revealed and realized in the mystery of Christ’s death and resurrection, but it needs to be welcomed in human history, which is always a history of fidelity on God’s part and unfortunately also of infidelity on the part of us men. The Church, the depositary of the blessing of the New Covenant, signed in the blood of the Lamb, is holy but made up of sinners, as Saint Ambrose wrote: the Church is “immaculata ex maculatis,” she is holy and spotless even though, in her earthly journey, she is made up of men stained with sin.

I want to recall this indefectible truth of the Church’s holiness to the many people who have been so deeply scandalized by the abominable and sacrilegious behavior of the former Archbishop of Washington, Theodore McCarrick; by the grave, disconcerting and sinful conduct of Pope Francis and by the conspiracy of silence of so many pastors, and who are tempted to abandon the Church, disfigured by so many ignominies. At the Angelus on Sunday, August 12, 2018 Pope Francis said these words: “Everyone is guilty for the good he could have done and did not do … If we do not oppose evil, we tacitly feed it. We need to intervene where evil is spreading; for evil spreads where daring Christians who oppose evil with good are lacking.” If this is rightly to be considered a serious moral responsibility for every believer, how much graver is it for the Church’s supreme pastor, who in the case of McCarrick not only did not oppose evil but associated himself in doing evil with someone he knew to be deeply corrupt. He followed the advice of someone he knew well to be a pervert, thus multiplying exponentially with his supreme authority the evil done by McCarrick. And how many other evil pastors is Francis still continuing to prop up in their active destruction of the Church!

Francis is abdicating the mandate which Christ gave to Peter to confirm the brethren. Indeed, by his action he has divided them, led them into error, and encouraged the wolves to continue to tear apart the sheep of Christ’s flock.

In this extremely dramatic moment for the universal Church, he must acknowledge his mistakes and, in keeping with the proclaimed principle of zero tolerance, Pope Francis must be the first to set a good example for cardinals and bishops who covered up McCarrick’s abuses and resign along with all of them.

Even in dismay and sadness over the enormity of what is happening, let us not lose hope! We well know that the great majority of our pastors live their priestly vocation with fidelity and dedication.

It is in moments of great trial that the Lord’s grace is revealed in abundance and makes His limitless mercy available to all; but it is granted only to those who are truly repentant and sincerely propose to amend their lives. This is a favorable time for the Church to confess her sins, to convert, and to do penance.

Let us all pray for the Church and for the Pope, let us remember how many times he has asked us to pray for him!

Let us all renew faith in the Church our Mother: “I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church!”

Christ will never abandon His Church! He generated her in His Blood and continually revives her with His Spirit!

Mary, Mother of the Church, pray for us!

Mary, Virgin and Queen, Mother of the King of glory, pray for us!

Rome, August 22, 2018
Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary

Official translation by Diane Montagna

[1] All the memos, letters and other documentation mentioned here are available at the Secretariat of State of the Holy See or at the Apostolic Nunciature in Washington, D.C.

]]> Uncle Tom Blames White Men for Queer Jew Bryan Singer Getting Away with Molesting Boys https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/12/07/uncle-tom-blames-white-men-for-queer-jew-bryan-singer-getting-away-with-molesting-boys/ Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Eric Striker
Daily Stormer 
December 7, 2017


The fact that queer Jew Bryan Singer likes little boys is an open and accepted fact in Hollywood.

According to a homosexual Jew’s coon named Ira Madison III, this is because white men run the movie industry!

Now, seriously speaking, even Roofus the Cisco-drinking black hobo knows Jews run Hollywood. Ira knows this as well. In fact, Lord Ira the III’s publication, The Daily Beast, is controlled by (((Barry Diller))) and (((Joey Levin))) at IAC.

This new brand of media-promoted black demagogue exists specifically to tell their fellow blacks that things powerful Jewish men do to America are actually the work of every day white people walking down the street. Ira the Jew’s Coon is to his fellow niggas what Ben Shapiro is meant to be to (((fellow whites))).

The Daily Beast:

When Jessica Chastain tweeted, “Let us not forget,” before linking to an article about Bryan Singer’s past sexual-assault allegations, who could’ve imagined that he’d soon be fired for a completely unrelated offense?

On Monday, The Hollywood Reporter broke the news that Singer has been fired from directing the upcoming Freddie Mercury biopic Bohemian Rhapsody, starring Rami Malek. It comes following reports of repeated absences from the set, which were explained away as “a personal health matter” and “unexpected availability,” according to different outlets.

Whatever the real reason, Singer hadn’t returned to the set since Thanksgiving, which led to his dismissal from the film. However, THR revealed today that there was far more drama on the set than unplanned absences. After Malek complained to the studio of Singer’s absence on set, they reportedly had a confrontation in which Singer threw an object at him. Amidst this, the actor Tom Hollander is alleged to have quit the production and had to be persuaded to return. During Singer’s sabbatical, cinematographer Thomas Newton Sigel directed to keep the film on schedule.

If you want an egregious example of the type of privilege afforded to white men in Hollywood, look no further than Singer’s career. Instances like this on set would get almost anyone fired, but this isn’t even the first time Singer has been unreliable and unprofessional on set.

All of the people Kang Ira III is implying are conspiring to hide Singer’s homo-pedophilia are Jews. This is the behavior of Jewish gangsters who run our media, not average white folks.

If I witnessed someone raping little boys, my first instinct would be to kick the shit out of him. The same is true for Mickey the bartender, John the construction worker, Joe the electrician, Pete the farmer.

Even most white collar white workers would at the very least anonymously report it to the police.

Isn’t it something that this kind of behavior only thrives in environments where Jews have all the power? Movie directors, corporate CEOs, journalists, politics, TV people.

Ira III ain’t a real Kang. He nuffin’ but a batty boy. If he’s willing to cover up the obvious truth that Jews run Hollywood, Ira too is willing to cover for the Jews and fags in his own industry (probably his own publication) that like to sexually abuse “twinks.”

]]> Thailand: American Homos Arrested for Desecrating Buddhist Temple with Their Butts https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/11/30/thailand-american-homos-arrested-for-desecrating-buddhist-temple-with-their-butts/ Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
November 29, 2017

Homos don’t feel comfortable unless they can expose their buttholes to the world.

Alright, we need an immediate ban on faggots visiting other countries and embarrassing us in front of the whole world until we can figure out what the hell is going on.

These filthy perverts are going around throwing their buttholes at random foreigners, who probably assume this is an American custom rather than a unique attribute of sodomites. This is even worse than our Blacks, who go to foreign countries to steal knick knacks and then need to get bailed out by the President.

Tourists double as unofficial representatives of our nation. The only way our “native” population of perverts and subhumans should be allowed to leave the US is on a one-way ticket to a third-world country of their choice.

San Diego Gay and Lesbian News:

A local Hillcrest married couple were arrested at Don Mueang airport in Bangkok on Tuesday night.

Travis Dasilva, nee Ti, and Joseph Dasilva had warrants that charged them with showing their naked buttocks at Wat Arun (Temple of Dawn) in Bangkok according to Bangkok Post.

What kind of subhuman retard would do such a thing? It only goes to show that homosexualism is a mental illness. Their obsession with butts goes way beyond simple sexual attraction and well into the realm of neurotic disorder. They literally can’t help themselves but defile even the most sacred of places – all in the name of butts.

“Pretty nice, but needs more butts.” – Homo.

Both men are United States citizens and were taken into custody by immigration police.

The 38-year-olds were taken into custody at the airport at approximately 8 pm local time while trying to leave the country said Pol Col Choenron Rimpadee, deputy spokesman of immigration police.

Both Travis and Joseph admitted to bending over and posing for the picture at the temple and were taken to the police station for legal action.

Trigger warning:

Don’t say I didn’t warn you this time.

They were charged with getting naked in public which violates criminal law and could carry a fine of up to 5,000 baht.

City Commissioner Nicole Murray-Ramirez says the men reached out to him for assistance and he is currently talking to American authorities on what to do next.

5,000 baht? That’s like 150 bucks!

The US government needs to immediately lobby Thailand to increase the fine and include jail time. 150 dollars is grossly insufficient punishment for the crime of being a homo.

]]> Gender Non-Conforming Father Accused of Murdering 13-Year-Old Bigoted Son https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/07/27/gender-non-conforming-father-accused-of-murdering-13-year-old-bigoted-son/ Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
July 26, 2017


A homophobic/transphobic 13-year-old white hetero-privileged male was killed in self-defense by his heroic gender non-conforming father.

New details emerging from the case suggest Dylan Redwine – who vanished in 2012 while under his father’s supervision – was the victim of foul play. His remains were recently uncovered off a hiking trail in Colorado, and cadaver dogs gave a positive in the home of his father Mark.

Mark Redwine is now in custody facing second-degree murder charges. Dylan’s brother Cody believes their father murdered him in anger after they discovered photos of him dressed in women’s clothing eating feces and started making fun of him over it.

As we all have been hearing incessantly for the past few years, bullying of the transgendered and gender-fluid is the number one problem plaguing America right now. While the First Amendment protects Dylan’s hate speech, that doesn’t mean it protects him from the consequences of his hetero-normative bigotry.

Daily Mail:

A father was allegedly led to kill his 13-year-old son after the boy found ‘compromising’ photos of him in diapers and eating feces.

Dylan Redwine went missing in November 2012 while on a court-ordered visit with his father, Mark, in Colorado.

The child’s remains were found seven months later scattered in southwestern Colorado mountains by wild animals.

Prosecutors now say that Redwine may have killed Dylan after he was confronted about the ‘disturbing’ pictures.

Redwine was arrested on Saturday and indicted by a grand jury with charges of second-degree murder and child abuse resulting in death after the four-and-a-half-year investigation.

Redwine has constantly denied playing a role in his son’s death and at one point appeared on Dr Phil to blame his ex-wife for the child’s death.

Cory Redwine, Dylan’s older brother, revealed that he had seen the photos.

‘I have seen the photos. It shows him wearing women’s clothes and makeup and a diaper and then eating his feces from the diaper. It was disgusting. We couldn’t believe it,’ he told ABC7.

Dylan’s mother, Elaine Hall, added that she believes her son confronted her ex-husband about the photos and was murdered for it.

‘He may have said something that just didn’t set well with Mark and Mark reacted in a very violent way…obviously. Dylan is no longer here,’ Hall said on a February 2015 podcast.

Perhaps a sympathetic Jewish judge/jury in Colorado will release Mr. Redwine like that Jew State Attorney in Florida does for blacks who murder “N-word” saying whites.

If what these people are saying is true, we can show Donald Trump that transphobia will not pass by letting Mark Redwine go!

You may think this article is bad satire, but if in 2017 Weimerica it’s legally ok to execute white people for saying “nigger” out loud, we’re barely a stone’s throw away from releasing cross dressing freaks who eat their own shit after they kill someone for being grossed out by them.

]]>