I recently saw some zoomer plebs shocked by scenes from 1990s films showing that high school kids went to parties on the weekends and hung out with each other, having fun times. Apparently, zoomers and younger (zoomers are all like almost 30 now actually, the generation younger than them I think is called Gen Q), just stay in their houses and masturbate.

Well, I lived in the 1990s, and I can tell you the parties were real and we had fun times all the time.

I have here collected some photos from my personal collection and from some old friends from the 1990s to share here for the sake of the nostalgia of my millennials and so the younger folks can learn about just how good we had it.

Not only did we have parties, we had fun creatures. It was when the Zionists did 9/11 that everything went bad. Under the Patriot Act, the Zionist Occupation Government banned all of our furry friends except dogs and cats. Yes, these photos are real. We partied and we had creatures for pets, many of whom could talk and love us all. They had social security numbers and everything, but the ATF shot them all, claiming they were a threat to Israel’s security.

Although the cops are still trying to kill everyone’s dogs, people believe that many dogs survived the pet holocaust that killed all these other species of pet because dogs are small and nimble and could dodge the bullets of cops, who have an average IQ of 76 and cannot shoot accurately. During most raids, cops kill more of each other than they do pets.

We used to go to music concerts as well. I saw many music bands in the 1990s, especially at the Warped Tour. After 9/11, Zionists banned the Warped Tour and had all pop punk musicians killed with exploding toothpaste and poisonous snakes.

We won’t ever bring back pop punk bands or those other kinds of pets we used to have. They were all murdered. However, maybe someday we will bring back fun times.

Who can say?

Everyone knew that any Netflix documentary about Alexander the Great was going to be a gay porno.

This is despite the fact that there is no actual evidence Alexander was gay. It’s just a big scam, like everything else.

Remix:

Greek Cultural Minister Lina Mendoni is outraged by U.S. streaming service Netflix’s take on Alexander the Great with its new show “Birth of a God.” The Greek minister of culture is upset that Alexander the Great — one of the most prominent figures in ancient history — is portrayed as homosexual, along with his main friend in the show.

An opinion piece in the Greek daily Eleftheros Typos had already been published earlier, saying that this was a “distortion of the truth.” In the article, Oliver Stone’s 2004 film Alexander was blamed for “launching a propaganda campaign about Alexander the Great’s homosexuality.”

That’s true.

I like Oliver Stone, actually, but he’s a communist Jew.

There is only one good media portrayal of Alexander.

They really need to release a BluRay, frankly. That shit was so cash.

Dimitris Natsios, the president of the right-wing Niki party, called the series “deplorable, unacceptable and unhistorical” and said the film aims to subliminally convey the idea — without any basis — that homosexuality was acceptable in ancient times.

Natsis also asked Mendoni what he thought about all this. The culture minister said the series was full of historical inaccuracies, which “shows the negligence of the director and the lack of quality of the script.”

Netflix? Poor quality script?

Say it ain’t so!

“There is no mention in the sources that this friendship goes beyond the boundaries of friendship as defined by Aristotle,” said Mendoni.

Asked by Nathosios whether the Greek government would take action against Netflix over this, Mendoni said that “such a move would be unconstitutional. Greece’s constitution has protected artistic freedom since the early 19th century.”

“The Ministry of Culture does not censor, prosecute, ban, manipulate, restrict or control the dissemination of information and ideas in a preventive, punitive or repressive way,” added Mendoni, according to The Guardian.

This isn’t exactly true.

The show is arguably homosexual pornography, which is not protected by Greece’s constitution.

Netflix could argue that this is “artistic expression,” and maybe they would win, but there is no reason for the Greeks not to take them to court and attempt to get the show banned from the country.

Even if they lost, it would prove a point.

The photo is from Brazil.

Reuters describes it thusly:

A security guard of Brazil’s presidency uses an anti-drone weapon against a drone that was flying near the Planalto Palace and the National Congress during events to mark the consolidation of democracy in Brazil, a year after supporters of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro stormed the presidential palace, Congress and Supreme Court, in Brasilia, Brazil January 8.

Here’s another photo, from France:

The gun is called the “DroneGun Tactical,” and is sold by an Australian-US company called “DroneShield.” They sell other models, but the one in the above pictures is apparently the state of the art model.

According to the company, the gun will “disrupt the signal” and cause the drone to land immediately, or possibly to return to its point of origin.

I’ve read a lot of comic books and watched a lot of science fiction entertainment media, and I’ve never seen a theoretical future weapon that looks like this anti-drone gun.

If I were to say what it reminds me of most, I would say that it looks like something out of a Final Fantasy game. Perhaps, also, something out of a Capcom game, such as Monster Hunter. However, I think it is too ugly and stupid-looking to have ever been thought up by any concept artist, and could only have been designed for practical purposes.

Here’s the thing: most things in our society are too ugly and stupid-looking to have been thought up by artists, and are instead purely designed based on practical concerns. That is what led to the modern skyscraper and all modern architecture, the modern car, IKEA type furniture,  and really everything else. There is no art or beauty in the world anymore. It’s disgusting and anti-human, and this wouldn’t have happened if Richard Nixon would have only agreed to resign if Elvis Presley was made the King of America.

Elvis cared very much about aesthetics and beauty. Look at his house, his fashion, the cars he drove, the way he arranged his stage shows. It was all intended to be beautiful.

Probably, one of the reasons that men are so obsessed with pornography these days is that there is nothing beautiful in their lives. A woman’s naked body is something beautiful.

We must reconsider this idea that things can be designed purely for efficiency and practicality. We are human beings, not machines. Most of these buildings in modern cities need to be torn down, because they are true abominations, and they dehumanize us all. Humans should not live in a hellscape. We used to live in nature, which is the most beautiful place, and then we designed our cities to be beautiful, according to theories of what makes for a pleasant human environment.

Most Americans, who live in cities which are mostly made up of parking lots and strip malls and mid-rise apartment monstrosities, are not even aware that people used to care what buildings looked like. People should go to Europe and look at the old cities. Look at Budapest or Prague or Barcelona or Saint Petersburg. People used to put such great care into making things beautiful, in order to raise up the human spirit.

These buildings now are crushing the human spirit.

You don’t have to make the anti-drone gun look beautiful. It is a purely practical item. But the environment of a city is not a purely practical thing. It is about our souls and our dignity. We deserve to live among beauty.

Some blacks can sing pretty well. This one ain’t one of them.

There is no evidence Cheddar Man was even black. They admitted that at the time. They just came up with that out of thin air, based on nothing.

In fact, the entire Cheddar Man thing could have been a hoax. It was all very sus.

Making everyone in British history black is offensive, I guess, but sort of hilarious.

GB News:

The BBC has sparked a furious race row after being accused of “rewriting history” following the release of a new song on children’s show Horrible Histories.

The TV series received a barrage of criticisms on social media over its song “Been Here From The Start”.

The CBBC programme traced the history of black people from Cheddar Man to the 20th century.

GB News host and former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage asked: “When will the BBC stop lying?”

Conservative commentator Anna McGovern added: “BBC’s children show Horrible Histories has released a song called Been Here From The Start which is about black people always being in Britain. BBC is rewriting history by teaching children that the original Britons were black.”

She added: “Facts the BBC got wrong: – It says that Septimius Severus was black.

“That’s false. – It says that the Aurelian moors were black.

“That’s false. – It says that Western Hunter Gatherers, the original people of Britain, were black. That’s false. It’s time to defund the BBC.”

Critics have also pointed out that whilst black people have resided in the United Kingdom in the last 2000 years it is unfair to imply medieval or early modern Britain was diverse.

Not all critics are going to agree that blacks have been in Britain for 2,000 years. All mainstream scientists don’t agree to that.

Cheddar man was established to be a hoax.

Around 20,000 black people lived in the United Kingdom in the 18th century.

The overall population started at around five million in 1700 and reached nearly nine million in 1801.

Depending on the period of the 18th century, the figure is either one-in-250 or one-in-450.

…

The song did not seem to spark much controversy when it was first released.

Honestly, I kinda like that black people have no history, so they insist on going back in white history and claiming everyone was black.

In itself, it’s harmless if blacks want to believe that. The problem is when Jews and white women take this and politicize it.

What an awful piece of shit this show is

I had been wondering if the Anglo-Saxons even existed.

White people don’t exist, so I wondered how a group of white people could exist.

RT:

Cambridge University is teaching students that the Anglo-Saxons never existed as a distinct ethnic group, in an effort to “dismantle the… myths” of English nationalism, the Telegraph reported on Saturday. Liberal academics have long decried the term for its association with “whiteness.”

Cambridge’s Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic (ASNC) will seek “to dismantle the basis of myths of nationalism – that there ever was a ‘British’, ‘English’, ‘Scottish’, ‘Welsh’ or ‘Irish’ people with a coherent and ancient ethnic identity – by showing students just how constructed and contingent these identities are and always have been,” the British newspaper reported, citing information from the university.

By denigrating the idea of a distinct Anglo-Saxon identity, the university said that it aims to make its teaching more “anti-racist.”

The controversy over the term ‘Anglo-Saxon’ began in 2019, when Canadian academic Dr Mary Rambaran-Olm resigned from the International Society of Anglo-Saxonists over the “inherent whiteness” of the field. Rambaran-Olm, who is not white, went on to write that “the Anglo-Saxon myth perpetuates a false idea of what it means to be ‘native’ to Britain,” and that the term is “historically inaccurate.”

The society changed its name to the International Society for the Study of Early Medieval England, but some academics were furious, describing the controversy as an attempt to impose American racial identity politics onto a British field of study. “The conditions in which the term is encountered, and how it is perceived, are very different in the USA from elsewhere,” 70 historians wrote in an open letter in 2020.

“It’s a continuation of what’s been going on for some years, where pride in national identity is being attacked,” political commentator Anthony Webber told RT. Pointing out that the modern-day English owe a third of their ancestry to the Anglo-Saxons, he added: “I don’t think it serves the cause of anti-racism to suddenly make sections of the population feel that they shouldn’t be proud of their background.”

Russia should take note of this and stop referring to the US as “Anglo-Saxons.”

Just call ’em kikes.

Gratuitous indie rock reference:

The authors of these anthropology articles should really stop using pictures of Prince Harry’s wife to represent Neanderthals. It’s unnecessarily mean.

I don’t really know that I believe any of this at all.

But it’s a funny story.

The Guardian:

It took three separate waves of modern humans to colonise Europe between 54,000 and 42,000 years ago. That is the key conclusion of scientists who have been studying caves in the Rhone valley where they have discovered evidence that Homo sapiens had to make a trio of determined attempts to head westwards and northwards from western Asia before they could establish themselves in the continent.

“The first two of these waves failed but the third succeeded around 42,000 years ago,” said Ludovic Slimak of the University of Toulouse, who is leading the excavations in France. “After that, modern humans took over in Europe. The Neanderthals, who had evolved on the continent, died out.”

…

Slimak has also argued, in previous papers, that modern humans, who first emerged from Africa around 60,000 years ago, may have been armed with bows and arrows to judge from the tiny 54,000-year-old pointed stone tools – which look very like arrowheads – that have been found in the Grotte Mandrin cave in the Rhône Valley. This technology – which allows hunters to kill at a distance without endangering themselves – would have given the incomers a vital advantage over local Neanderthals.

The Grotte Mandrin in France’s Rhone Valley

However, after a period of around 40 years, this first group of modern human incomers disappeared from the fossil record and the site was subsequently re-occupied by Neanderthals. If our ancestors were better equipped, why did this first intrusion into Europe end this way? Similarly, why did the second wave – which probably occurred around 44-46,000 years ago – also end in failure?

One answer is straightforward, says Slimak. Those early waves of humans simply lacked numbers. He believes there were up to 100 men, women and children in the Grotte Mandrin settlement. “That may not have been sufficient to maintain their biological strength and perhaps they could not exchange genes with local Neanderthals because the fertility between them was poor,” he added.

However, he rejected the idea that relations between Neanderthals and modern humans were poor. In fact, every indication suggests that the two groups were on good terms.

Then came the third wave, and this time it seems that our ancestors did have the numbers, Slimak added. “The third time they came in, modern humans did so with a really huge wave of people and began to build social networks, not with Neanderthals but with individual small separate groups of Homo sapiens in order to build a huge network throughout Europe. And in the end, that is what started the decline of the Neanderthals in Europe.”

Well.

I mean.

A lot of people might read something like this and start drawing comparisons, I think.

You know?

Is this the counteroffensive???

It’s against poor old Pushkin???

Well.

That actually makes sense, quite frankly.

The Guardian:

The seated sculpture of Alexander Pushkin on Peremohy Avenue in central Kyiv is living on borrowed time – and not only because of the threat of Russian missiles.

Unprotected by sandbags and hoardings, unlike the capital’s better-loved monuments, the statue of Russia’s national poet is covered by spray-painted graffiti.

These are variously translatable as “imperialist”; “what did he do for Ukraine?”; and “soldier of the other culture”. The single word that sums up the mood of the interventions, though, is straightforward: “Demolish!”

Pushkin has been falling rapidly in Ukraine. Since the start of the full-scale invasion last February, more than 30 monuments to the poet have been dismantled.

From a western European or anglophone perspective the loathing of a poet who died nearly 200 years ago can seem bewildering.

In the west, he is probably less read in the 21st century than absorbed through much-loved adaptations – Tchaikovsky’s ballets and operas including Eugene Onegin and The Queen of Spades.

In Ukraine things look very different. The bronze statue in Kyiv – a mighty monument erected in 1962 – is unlikely to survive the war, at least in its present position.

Volodymyr Zelenskiy last month signed new decolonisation legislation into law, which will almost certainly result in the removal of the statue, and many like it.

…

According to research published five years ago, 594 streets in Ukraine were named after the poet.

That made him the third most common historical figure represented in the country’s streetscapes, behind Ukraine’s national poet, Taras Shevchenko, and the Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. At the time the research was conducted, he outranked leading Ukrainian literary figures such as the pioneering feminist Lesya Ukrainka and the polymath Ivan Franko.

In the streets of the eastern city of Kharkiv, about 20 miles from the Russian border, Pushkin looms even larger than in Kyiv. “There are two streets in Kharkiv named after Pushkin,” said Maria Takhtaulova, who works for the city’s branch of the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory, the government body tasked with bringing Ukrainian national history to light.

“Why? He had no connection with the city. He didn’t come here – though he did insult Kharkiv University, saying it was worse than a tavern in Kursk.”

…

In Kharkiv, there is also a Pushkin underground station and a Pushkin theatre – the latter still bears the name on the facade, though it has recently been officially renamed Kharkiv Academic Drama Theatre. There is also a plinth, now empty, where a bust of Pushkin stood until the city council removed it in November.

A metro worker looks at a monument to Pushkin in Pushkinska metro station in Kharkiv

The reality is that even before the decolonisation laws come into force, Pushkin is disappearing from the streetscapes of Ukraine.

In Kyiv, the city’s oldest monument to Pushkin, a bust erected in 1899 in Slavy Square, was toppled by unknown activists on 11 October last year, leaving an empty plinth.

No one can say this is not a war against the Russian people as a race.

It’s a war of extermination.

That is the goal.

Pushkin died in 1837.

He is not a Putin supporter or a supporter of the Ukraine war.

For those of you who were not math majors: he’s been dead nearly 200 years.

He is an enemy because he represents Russian culture and Russian identity, and “the Ukraine” – read: American Jewry – is at war with Russians as a people.

Previously: Netflix Doing Docuseries Portraying Cleopatra as Black

The Egyptians are able to complain about so-called “coonwashing” in art and get a fair hearing.

Meanwhile, if you complained about the play “Hamilton” – or for that matter, any of these Netflix or BBC shows that make white characters black – you would definitely be banned from Facebook, lose your job, and probably get a divorce. Also, the CPS might just kidnap your kids.

NBC News:

Egypt has accused Netflix of misrepresenting history by casting a Black woman to play Cleopatra, its most famous historical figure, in a new series.

“Queen Cleopatra,” which is released May 10, features Adele James in the lead role, a casting decision that the streaming giant says is “a nod to the centuries-long conversation about the ruler’s race” but which officials in Cairo have dismissed as “blatant historical fallacy.”

The government statement issued Thursday marked an escalation in a feud that has sparked demands for the show’s cancellation, amid a broader debate over representation in popular culture.

The eight-episode docudrama is executive produced by Jada Pinkett-Smith.

This bitch producing shows? How she producing shows when she ain’t got no hair?

If some bald ass bitch showed up at my studio like “lemme do that producing,” I’d be like “bitch, how you gonna produce when you ain’t got no hair???”

I guess Netflix executives were scared of getting slapped by her husband, even though he slaps like a bitch-ass nigga.

But Egypt’s Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities argued that the documentary nature of the feature “requires those in charge of its production to investigate accuracy and rely on historical and scientific facts.”

Coins and statues from the time show a light-skinned woman, in keeping with Cleopatra’s Macedonian Greek ancestry, it argued.

Yeah, all the leadership of Egypt was white, pretty much the whole time.

The empire probably collapsed due to race-mixing with negro slaves, which caused it to cease being able to properly function.

Which is sort of ironic in context.

Dr. Mostafa Waziri, secretary-general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, said in the statement that Cleopatra’s appearance in the show was a “falsification of Egyptian history and a blatant historical fallacy.”

He added that his complaint was “far from any ethnic racism, stressing full respect for African civilizations and for our brothers in the African continent that brings us all together.”

One of Egypt’s most famous archaeologists and twice-serving antiquities minister, Zahi Hawass, was adamant: Cleopatra was not Black.

“If we see statues and forms of her father and brother, we will not find any evidence supporting this claim that she was black,” he said in a statement.

Hawass added that Egypt at the time of Cleopatra’s reign ruled over the Kingdom of the Kush, also known as Nubia, in what is now Sudan and southern Egypt, with its distinctive Black African culture. “But they have no connection with the Pharaonic civilization,” he said.

…

Egyptian lawmaker Saboura al-Sayyed this week repeated an earlier call for Netflix to be banned across the country.

It probably will end up being banned in Egypt, which is pretty based.

To be clear (some of the news reports are not totally clear), they are not saying she was similar to a modern Egyptian (Arab), they are explicitly saying she was Greek (white).

They released this depiction of her:

It’s very different from the one Jada released, which, let me remind you, was this:

Indians are not offended by being called “Indians.” They all identified by their tribal name anyway, so which word is used to distinguish them from white men is not important to them. They say this themselves.

“Native American” is not better anyway, as neither “Native” nor “American” are their own words.

CNN:

A location in Arizona’s Grand Canyon National Park is getting rid of its “offensive” name.

Indian Garden, a popular stop along the park’s Bright Angel Trail, will now be called Havasupai Gardens.

The name change is an effort to right a historic wrong. Members of the Havasupai tribe, who had been there for generations, were removed from the inner rim canyon area by the National Park Service’s policies nearly 100 years ago.

Yeah, because they were getting drunk and throwing trash everywhere!

They were turning a beautiful place into a big mess!

Afterward, the area the Havasupai referred to as Ha’a Gyoh became known as Indian Garden.

“The Grand Canyon National Park team was proud to work alongside the Havasupai Tribal Council in our joint effort to rename this culturally significant location,” Ed Keable, the park’s superintendent, said in a statement.

“The Havasupai people have actively occupied this area since time immemorial, before the land’s designation as a national park and until the park forcibly removed them in 1926. This renaming is long overdue. It is a measure of respect for the undue hardship imposed by the park on the Havasupai people.”

Yeah, okay faggot.

They are not letting the Indians move back in though.

Obviously, Indians don’t care what white people call their spot. What they would presumably want – if they want anything – is to move back in.

Once again, you can see clearly: political correctness is not about helping nonwhites, it is about hurting whites. In this case, it’s about harassing whites with guilt over what they supposedly did to the Indians.

As anyone who has read any of the old books about these Indians knows, there was no choice but to physically remove them.

They were absurdly stupid, violent, and cruel, like goblins. They did not have any military goals other than to kill, which made them totally impossible to negotiate with. When they signed treaties, they just immediately broke them because they didn’t understand the concept. I’ve read all these books from before 1930. I used to pay a lot of money for them. They’re not even available on the internet, from what I’ve seen, because whoever scans these books doesn’t want you to know what’s in them.

These Indians were simply outrageous. Like literal goblins, or worse – kobolds.

The Indians would cut a man’s guts open, pull out his intestines, and hang him from a tress by his own entrails while he was still alive. Indians invented scalping. They would very regularly burn entire groups of white prisoners alive. It was a circus of brutality.

Buffalo Bill was right. The only solution to the Indian problem was alcohol. That was the only thing that made them relax and stop murdering, kidnapping, and torturing.

If it wouldn’t have been for alcohol, we would have had to kill them all.

At this point, I’m just tired of even bothering to report this stuff.

We were reporting all this stuff back when the site was launched in 2013, and no one believe that it was real. It was all these people on tumblr promoting this gibberish, and people would say “oh, that is just a lunatic fringe.” And we were like: “no, actually these people have a whole lot of energy, and they are increasingly being endorsed by the mainstream – this is going to be mainstream soon.”

People didn’t believe it, they wouldn’t bother to fight against it because they said it was irrelevant, now here we are. It’s way too late to stop any of it, because you’re not even allowed to complain about it. Breitbart itself – which to their credit, does cover this stuff a lot more than most other sites – will not even say “trannies aren’t real.”

Breitbart:

In the latest example of historical revisionism being used to erase women by the woke LGBTQ+ movement, a scholar has claimed that Queen Elizabeth I of England was “non-binary”.

Along with the announcement from Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre that they have cast St Joan of Arc as a “gender-neutral” character in an upcoming play, Dr Kit Heyam penned a blog post for the theatre’s website earlier this month defending why “it was necessary” to use modern gender theory when looking at the past.

As far as I can tell, this is a woman who mutilated herself into becoming a parody of a man

Dr Heyam, who describes himself as a “trans awareness trainer” with (they/them or he/him) pronouns, said St Joan was not the only historical example of LGBTQ+ figures, claiming that 10th-century ruler Æthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians, and Queen Elizabeth I of England were both transgender.

“Æthelflæd, who governed Mercia after the death of their [sic] husband, was later described as ‘conducting…Armies, as if she had changed her sex’: to take on a male-coded military role was, in some sense, for Æthelflæd to become male,” Heyam wrote.

“Elizabeth I, similarly, described themself [sic] regularly in speeches as ‘king’, ‘queen’ and ‘prince’, choosing strategically to emphasise their female identity or their male monarchical role at different points,” he added. “Inhabiting that social role and dressing in the clothes associated with it, while living and working among men, may not just have felt like gendered defiance: it may have had a profound impact on their sense of self.”

Born in 1533, Elizabeth I was one of the longest-serving rulers in British history, behind only Queen Victoria and her namesake Queen Elizabeth II, the current reigning monarch.

…

There have long been conspiracy theories surrounding her gender, such as the one promoted by 19th-century Dracula author Bram Stoker, which posited that Queen Elizabeth I cut such a masculine figure because she was in fact a man and that the real Elizabeth had died as a child and was replaced by a boy with similar features.

See? Intelligent people have always endorsed “tinfoil hat” type conspiracy theories.

I don’t believe Stoker’s theory, but it just goes to show that smart people have always been willing to entertain ideas that are on par with “Sandy Hook was a hoax” or “Joe Biden is a clone or Jim Carrey or something.”

The “Bisley Boy” theory attempted to explain why she remained a virgin throughout her life and was able to command such respect militarily. However, the theory was based on merely circumstantial evidence, with many counterfactuals, such as her having been inspected by doctors to determine if she could bear children.

Ironically, some gender-critical feminists have noted that the woke LGBTQ+ view of history is actually “gender conservative” in that it assumes that women cannot do “manly” things.

Philosopher Dr Jane Clare Jones told The Telegraph: “This is a really great example of the inherent gender conservatism in gender identity ideology. Traditional gender conservatism says that men must do ‘manly’ things, and women must do ‘womanly’ things.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

“Gender identity ideology reverses that and then we end up with the idea that anyone who does ‘manly’ things must be a man, and anyone who does ‘womanly’ things must be a woman.

“This is how we end up in a situation in which historical women who have performed traditionally ‘masculine’ roles end up being re-categorised as ‘trans men’ or ‘non-binary’ or ‘not-women’ in some way. This is a really regressive message to be sending out, especially to young women.”

No one has explained what the point of any of this is.

They don’t really try to explain that it is good for society, and instead focus on the individuals, claiming it is good for them to mutilate their hormone systems and genitals. But they also admit that these people have the highest suicide rate, by a lot, and they can’t argue that making it illegal to be a tranny would not solve this suicide issue and make the trannies themselves much happier.

They say that the reason that there weren’t any trannies in history was because they were suppressed, but if that is the case, it also prevented suicide. So logically, if you cared about the individuals, you would suppress them.

This is all about Jews destroying society. That is all that is happening here with all of this weird tranny satanism.

Remember when the BBC had non-trannies on it? It wasn’t even that long ago.