The following revelations will come as no surprise to dedicated Drumpf-watchers.

To recap: instead of hiring people who supported his agenda, Donald Trump hired a bunch of weirdo neocons who did everything they could to undermine his presidency and his agenda.

Now, they’re squabbling amongst themselves and pointing fingers in their tell-all books.

Nimrata Randhawa, who was the US Ambassador to the UN for awhile and an unabashed neocon shill, blames Rex Tillerson and John Kelly for sabotaging Trump – even though she was almost certainly the anonymous leaker who gloated in the New York Times about a secret Deep State cabal of Human Rights Freedom Democracy advocates that had made undermining the MAGA agenda their agenda.

Sometimes the best defense is a good offense.

BBC:

Nikki Haley, former US ambassador to the UN, has said two top White House aides encouraged her to undermine President Donald Trump.

In a new book, Ms Haley says then-Chief of Staff John Kelly and then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told her to resist some of Mr Trump’s demands.

They reportedly told her they were “trying to save the country”.

There was no immediate comment from Mr Tillerson. Mr Kelly said he had wanted the president to be fully informed.

“If by ‘resistance’ and ‘stalling’ she means putting a staff process in place… to ensure [Mr Trump] knew all the pros and cons of what policy decision he might be contemplating so he could make an informed decision, then guilty as charged,” Mr Kelly told US broadcaster CBS.

Mr Trump tweeted his approval of the book, writing: “Good luck Nikki!”

Trump’s continued support for Nikki “Leaky Bindi” Haley doesn’t make much sense, really.

This bitch went out of her way to defy him every chance she got. She promised Syrian refugees funding and sanctuary in the US, despite what her boss was saying publicly at the time. Her office effectively went rogue and Rex Tillerson tried to rein her in by trying to force her to go through him and his people first.

The inside-baseball gossip accounts are in agreement:

I find this very suspicious given that she had no control over foreign policy and Tillerson hated Haley. Famously even writing her a letter telling her to stop making foreign policy declarations without clearing it with him. https://t.co/PUSfCLmC9o

— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) November 10, 2019

It’s sad to think that even now, at this late hour, Donald Trump can’t seem to tell who his friends and who his enemies are.

It’s not all bad though.

You can always count on Trump to make the right decision eventually… when all the other options have been exhausted.

Jamie, hypothetical ideal worker

The future is female.

Daily Mail:

A list of the most important attributes employees need to thrive in the workplace has been revealed, and experience level isn’t make or break.

Medical technologies firm Stryker created a hypothetical ‘perfect’ staff member, which found personality often trumps skills.

The company identified the most useful human qualities needed for workers to succeed when working side-by-side with technology and even created Jamie – a mould of the ideal worker.

Jamie has the skills the company said workers need to be successful, such as being an active listener, agile, good under pressure and having an entrepreneurial spirit.

Agile? So the ideal worker isn’t an obese American?

Agile

The entrepreneurial spirit is key, but you don’t want too much of it lest the workers quit and start their own businesses. Women are ideal for this, as they’re known to be adept in the art of getting results by telling others what to do instead of doing it themselves.

But they’re not good under real pressure, so maybe we should inject them with testosterone to make them a little bit more like men in that regard.

Senior director of human resources Erin Cramlet revealed to Daily Mail Australia that hiring is starting to come down to emotional attributes over an impressive CV.

‘Soon the traditional resume will be dead and it will be down to the personal qualities of someone over experience,’ Ms Cramlet said.

‘For us it wasn’t that conventional wisdom of looking at resumes, it was what are those characteristics that we’re going to need from individuals and then we can train them up with new technology.

‘We don’t find the commonality in background but we find it in strengths and (personal) characteristics’.

Sounds good, right? Workplaces won’t ask for years and years of experience and references, and it will all be more meritocratic overall.

Except it won’t, because they’ll value personality, “personal qualities” and “emotional attributes” over merit, which, considering our current societal landscape, likely means that white people who don’t suffer from excruciating self-hate will be rejected on the grounds of their Nazism.

Ultimately, this is another form of dysgenics.

It provides monetary prizes to malleable, servile people.

Stryker said humans will need to perform to a higher standard and have increased brain volume as the workforce becomes more robotics and automation-focused.

‘The worker of the future will need human-centric skills in influence, negotiation and judgment,’ the company said.

‘At the same time, the rise in automation will continue to demand a greater focus on creative roles and creative skills, as well as lifelong learning to support an ever-evolving workplace.’

Men have higher brain volume than women, so it seems that their ideal worker is an androgynous being with the features they’ve picked from men and women.

Male? Female? The ideal worker.

Looking at the appearance of the average man and woman nowadays, it is clear that humans are going in that direction.

Stryker found the ideal worker more emotionally intelligent, a better active listener and collaborator.

Jamie features long and dexterous fingers, representing the perfect employee’s increasing interaction with technology, as well as agility and adaptability.

Stryker said impactful communication will become increasingly important in a worker of the future.

It’ll be all about emotions and feelings in the future.

Making men more like women and women more like men will result in the ideal sterile and disposable worker drone that will serve its hive corporation. In this context, the current push for transsexualism may or may not be a coincidence.

Stryker’s mention of higher brain volumes and the need for workers to perform at a higher standard to keep up with automation and robots may be naively interpreted as a “no blacks allowed” sign, considering that so-called people of color are significantly less intelligent than light-skinned people. However, looking at how our society encourages people to stand in-between race and gender, it is likely that the ideal worker of the future will be a gay mulatto.

Just as being entrepreneurial is a positive quality to look for in an employee but being too entrepreneurial becomes a liability, intelligence is desired but only up to a certain point. They want workers to be intelligent enough to be productive but not so intelligent that they figure out a way to get out of the farm.

If they want to farm this ideal worker drone, the lines between the sexes and races are to be blurred.

We must all make sacrifices for the sake of diversity, eh. That’s what Canada’s all aboot.

If you think you can avoid being a target for firing at your job by being politically correct in your speech and behavior, I’ve got some bad news for you. You’re already a target by virtue of being a “fucking White male.”

Being a beta cuck faggot doesn’t make you safe – it just means you’ll be the last to go. If you’re lucky.

But don’t worry. Once every real job is done by women and Blacks, the economy is going to be so much better that we might just be able to get WiFi and Xbox’s in our man-cages. So whatever you do, don’t resist and make it harder on everyone.

Metro News:

Michelle Obama challenged tech leaders to make sacrifices for the sake of gender equality last week during Dreamforce, one of the world’s biggest tech conferences.

“Sacrifices.”

Interesting choice of word, there, Micheal.

Did you have something like this in mind?

“If we’re not willing to share the power,” Obama said, “and maybe step down from a seat or create more seats at the table, if we’re not just hoarding seats and thinking it’s all mine mine mine mine mine, until we do that, then it won’t change.”

Yes, yes, White men need to “step down” from their seats…

We’re hearing you loud and clear.

The numbers show a clear problem. In 2016, women made up only 23 per cent of science, technology, engineering and mathematics jobs worldwide, according to LinkedIn.

But, if one thing was clear at the San Francisco gathering, it’s that the tech world is undergoing a much-needed shakeup. Equity and diversity have gone from buzzwords to core values. Companies, and the women within them, are realizing their power — and making changes.

This is how four Canadian tech companies are taking new approaches to gender equality:

Shopify
Problem: Archaic, male-dominated co-op programs
Solution: A new bachelor of computer science program

White males are increasingly avoiding universities due to the intensely hostile atmosphere, total politicization of every subject and lowered standards. So it makes sense that hiring from a pozzed-up undergraduate program would lead to very few White males being interested.

College students: prime recruitment ground for a tech-savvy corporation. The token White guy is still an unfortunate holdover from college’s supremacist past, but is sure to go away soon.

Hootsuite
Problem: Unconscious biases
Solution: Top-down education

In other words, “sensitivity training.” Which is to say, “brainwashing sessions.”

Good thing those things have been shown to have the opposite effect on men’s attitudes towards “diversity.” Well, I guess by turning all the men in the company into mysoginistic Nazis, it’ll give Hootsuite a good excuse to fire them all later.

BroadbandTV
Problem: The gender pay gap
Solution: Quarterly reviews

In other words, pay women who don’t work the same hours and contribute less to the company the same pay as the men who shoulder the burden. Normally, men who work a lot and make huge contributions will then go on to demand pay increases. By reviewing everyone’s pay and making sure that there’s no “pay gap,” you can be sure that women will be getting raises they wouldn’t deserve over their male co-workers.

Dot Health
Problem: Closet discriminators
Solution: “No A–holes”

In other words, fire everyone who’s not a low-testosterone bugman. Strong men have strong opinions and tend to express them in blunt, honest ways. That of course is going to irritate women, faggots and brown people. Solution? Get rid of em’!

As more and more corporations implement these kinds of policies, it’s going to become essentially impossible for normal White guys to hold jobs there. If you want to make money in the future, you’ll have to either go into trades or start your own business.

The good thing, of course, is that all these evil anti-White companies are going to collapse from the inside after cleansing their operations from actual competent people – White men.