Heterosexuals are fundamentally awesome. We put out penises in the correct hole: the vagina hole (and maybe under some specific and limited circumstances, the mouth hole – particularly if there are complications involved in strengthening the power of the erection).

No one needs to be “aware” of heterosexuals.” Everyone knows about us and our incredible achievements. Even the faggots themselves are a result of heterosexuality. Heterosexuality is the only way in which a human can be created.

However, people do need to be reminded that we are awesome.

New York Post:

A saloon in Idaho is drawing both jeers and cheers for its cheeky counter-programming to Pride Month, declaring June “Heterosexual Awesomeness Month,” billing it as a celebration of all things straight.

“Come join us all month to celebrate heterosexuals, for without them, none of us would be here!” Old State Saloon in the city of Eagle wrote in a Facebook post announcing a month of festivities and drink specials.

Every Monday in June will be “Hetero Male Monday,” with a free draft beer given to “any heterosexual male dressed like a heterosexual male,” the bar said.

The bar even put out a call seeking a “professional” judge qualified “to determine if men’s chosen clothing is officially heterosexual,” offering $15 per hour plus free beer as compensation to anyone who “think[s] you have what it takes to determine straight threads.”

Wednesdays will be for couples, where “each heterosexual couple” will receive 15% off their bill.

Thursdays are ladies’ nights–heterosexual ladies, to be precise — with “Her Hetero Happy Hour” promising happy-hour prices for straight women all day long.

The Facebook post drew nearly 2,000 comments within 72 hours, with a well-balanced mix of people applauding the subversive mock celebration and those who took offense.

“This is horribly disappointing. I can handle differing political views. I CANNOT handle bigotry and hate towards marginalized communities,” a Facebook user wrote.

Another person weighed in, “Imagine being this insecure.”

If all of America was Idaho, we would not have very many problems.

We’d probably still have some Jew-lovers, but a “National State of Idaho” would allow freedom of speech, which would allow us to easily explain to the Jew-lovers that “Judeo-Christianity” is a Jewish scam perpetrated by the same people who murdered our Sweet Lord Jesus.

But anal is the key evil. It is the key to evil. I’m thinking of several different Zelda-related analogies here.

In Zelda, there was an evil wizard with a very specific phenotype that included a very prominent nose attempting to force a blight on a peaceful land of joyful and awesome heterosexuals.

And you had to… you know… you had to find keys to destroy his castle or whatever.

All my love to the Old State Saloon, which methinks may be launching a revolution.

Let’s see some other bars do this.

Homosexuals remain a small minority, while heterosexuals are the majority. So it makes a lot of basic common sense to do marketing towards heterosexuals.

The problem is that the feds might send in fully-militarized police to kill your dog and beat the shit out of you for saying things like “heterosexuality is awesome.”

I think maybe some boomer in Iowa doesn’t understand the threat of fed violence against people who promote heterosexuality.

I hope it goes well for this bar and their dog.

Liberals continue to be the real fascists as they define the right as being fascists.

There is nothing more fascist than calling someone else a fascist against their will.

Washington Examiner:

A teacher from Madison High School in San Diego claimed fascists are synonymous with the “modern-day Republican Party” and “white, Christian, heterosexuals,” according to a student at the school. Speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, the high school student detailed the teacher’s unhinged definition of a “fascist.”

The school began the 2022-23 year on Aug. 29. The alleged incident occurred at the high school last Thursday.

“Immediately, I walk in and notice on the board, it says, ‘The Republican Party is the fascist party, and it does not fit the mold of a Democratic Party,'” the student told me. “It’s the first thing I saw when I came in.”

The student took a picture of this and shared it with me. It read, “As it is currently constituted, the Republican Party is now a fascist organization that no longer fits the category of a conventional Democratic Party.”

But the teacher didn’t stop there. He continued with his radical left-wing indoctrination by listing whites, Christians, and heterosexuals as groups that are “fascist.” The student took a picture during the class that shows how the teacher defined “fascist.” On the classroom’s white dry-erase board, the teacher wrote the word “fascist,” underlined it, and listed the words: Trump, heterosexual, white, Christian, and hatred of foreigners, immigrants, and minorities, among others.

“Then, he goes to this board and writes ‘fascist’ on it, and this really struck me. He immediately made the comparison of the Republican Party to the Nazi Party. And that was really offensive to me,” the student said. “He listed the Republican Party and the Nazi Party as similar. And that’s just ridiculous, and I took offense to that. So I took a picture of it.”

Then, the teacher continued to insult and denigrate different groups of people, according to the student.

“He goes on to insult white people and Christian people, automatically putting them under … that they’re automatically fascist,” the student said.

When I asked the student if the teacher said anything specifically about insulting whites and Christians, the student expanded on what the teacher said.

“He just kind of put up that they’re fascists, and they support a fascist government,” the student said. “Immediately — he didn’t even ask the class about it. He just made the assumption right away that whites and Christians automatically support a fascist government.”

This happened in an English class at the high school. I asked the student to elaborate on what learning about fascism has to do with the class’s syllabus.

“We were supposed to be learning how to make an argument for an argumentative essay,” the student said. “And the first thing he turns to is that. Then, he just got to the definition of fascism and what he thinks. He put down the Nazi Party and the modern-day Republican Party, which is just ridiculous.”

You see, leftists actually plan out their agenda to indoctrinate the youth.

Frankly, I hate to say this, but most male high school teachers are probably homosexuals. I wish we had a country where men could instruct young boys without that being the assumption, but right now that is the assumption.

It’s funny to call Trump people “fascists” after the Bloody Thursday speech.

I’m not going to say “Biden is a fascist,” but those optics were deliberately invoking Hitler – or rather, invoking comic book villains based on Hitler.

pic.twitter.com/VOC8X41xKj

— Jeremy (@BravesFan252) September 9, 2022

Teacher looks like a redditor, go figure.

— J (@Becquerl1) September 9, 2022

I am so sick of this.

— JMD (@Huma_Non) September 9, 2022

Where do these humanoids come from?

— Terk (@TerrK038867311) September 9, 2022

The state of Western education

— mir⁷🌙🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾 (@mirbrandnew) September 9, 2022

Pictured: Baloo playing with a watermelon.

Women are used to wasting the time of men without suffering any kind of consequence.

But this time, there were consequences.

Daily Mail:

A mating date for two polar bears went badly wrong at a Russian zoo when the male suddenly killed the female as she rejected him as they were poised to copulate.

Aurora had been moved 1,900 miles from Krasnoyarsk in Siberia to Izhevsk in the Urals to be introduced to giant male Baloo.

Perhaps there was a clue of trouble ahead in their first meeting when a video shows how she inspected the male, before turning and walking in the opposite direction.

Yet during a two-week ‘courtship’ they played, basked in the sun, and swam together, and it appeared Aurora was ‘receptive’.

Keepers watched and waited for the key moment – but it ended in tragedy.

Head of Royev Ruchey zoo in Krasnoyarsk, Andrey Gorban, said: ‘At the very moment he mounted her, something went wrong.

‘Aurora showed her character, and Baloo was furious.’

The aggressive attack is believed to be the first of its kind in captivity.

Zoo staff threw water and shot a sedative at Baloo but it was too late.

In seconds he had savaged and killed the smaller female.

When you’re sexually interested in a woman, you have to get the sex before you give up your time and attention.

Baloo, in a display of good will, gave her his time and attention before he obtained sex, and the traitorous slut, having achieved everything she wanted, decided that she didn’t need to give anything in return, and she got what she deserved.

This is a picture of Aurora eating a watermelon. The watermelon looks like Aurora after she rejected Baloo.

Similar scenarios play out all of the time in the human world, where thirsty males shower women with attention without ever getting any kind of physical contact in return, with the exception that human males tend to double down on their time investment when the female rejects them instead of pulling a Baloo.

That’s not how modern heterosexual relationships work.

From the moment you meet her and in every interaction, you have to figure out a way to initiate any kind of physical contact with her, and once you do that, you have to continue pushing the threshold until you get what you want.

You can’t just try to mount her after two weeks of playing friendship and expect her to be receptive.

By making your intentions clear, you are forcing her to decide whether she wants to engage you on that level. She knows your intentions either way. She knows she’s got nothing going for her other than a moist hole between her legs which a man can in theory put a penis into and pull a baby out of. If you pretend like something else is going on, something different than seeking access to this gooey hole, she interprets that as weakness and views you as someone she can exploit for emotional and physical resources.

Sadly, that’s what most men do these days.

Justice Hayden, Guardian of The Old Ways

The Jewish media puts sex everywhere to make people think about it constantly, but the Jews also make heterosexual sex much more difficult to achieve by introducing convoluted ideas about “consent” and about what marriage is supposed to be.

One man is taking a stand against that bullshit. This judge is bringing old ideas and common sense back into the discussion about the role of marriage in our society, and he’s doing all of that by… saying that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife.

RT:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

“I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.

The husband has pledged to no longer sleep with his wife but prosecuting lawyers are still pushing for a court order barring sexual relations to prevent the woman from being raped.

Let’s get something out of the way first: all women have learning difficulties. It’s just a matter of how severe those difficulties are.

That said, if she can say yes or no to a question such as “do you want some ice cream?” or “do you feel like watching a movie?” then she can absolutely consent to sex.

This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.

The insanity of this story is augmented by the fact that even though the poor husband pledged to no longer sleep with his wife, prosecutors still push for a court order to officially make him unable to have sex with his wife.

Do you understand how insane that is?

If a man can’t have sex with his wife, why does he have a wife?

But Jewcheck Twitter is mad.

This legitimises misogyny and woman-hatred. A judge stating “I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife”. No man in the UK has such a legal right to insist on sex. No consent = rape. https://t.co/PUYmhR9TN3

— Thangam Debbonaire (@ThangamMP) April 2, 2019

It is not a basic human right to have sex with your wife. It is not even close to a right .

— Jess Phillips (@jessphillips) April 2, 2019

Whatever the circumstances, no one has the right to have sex with you without your consent.

Contact us for support ➡️ https://t.co/V88nIRxZBe pic.twitter.com/EYHb9uGBDf

— Victim Support (@VictimSupport) April 2, 2019

I'm surprised, in this day and age, it's even being discussed. A bit of a no-brainer.

And I'd have thought, for the dinosaurs with this attitude, sex would be a distant memory.

— Dave Heavy (@Heavy_Dave) April 2, 2019

Having read the article, I’d expect the judge to want to consider all angles. The fact he’s representing the best interests of the husband rather than her in his wording is the concern. There’s nothing to suggest this woman’s wants have changed, just that her capacity has.

— Francesca (@Francesca_W_S) April 2, 2019

Justice Hayden's 'I cannot think of any more fundamentally obvious human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife' is astonishing & revolting in equal measure. Get a grip, man, and maybe visit the 21st century while you're at it.

— Kathy Martin🇪🇺 (@KathyMartin001) April 2, 2019

I don't consider it a basic human right to even make eye contact with my partner before they've had their first morning coffee.

— Eran Edry (@EranE1980) April 2, 2019

As a psychotherapist who works with people with learning disabilities. I'm curious to know if in fact the woman has learning disabilities or diffulties. The two definitions are quite different but often get confused even by professionals in the field

— James Hawkins (@jammyhawkeye) April 2, 2019

I still hope someone would try to explain why should anyone marry in this day and age. Maybe provide a list of the alleged benefits of marriage, benefits you can’t get without marriage.

The marriage of today is not the marriage of our great-grandfathers, and you can thank the Jews for that.

I know some of you may think marriage isn’t that bad. Maybe you understand it’s a bad deal on a logical level but you feel it has its charm.

Believe me, it has no charm anymore.

The idea about marriage that most people have in their subconscious was put there by tales of old, by their grandfathers, and by the Jewish social-engineering media machine.

If marriage doesn’t ask anything from women, and gives them half of your stuff or more whenever they please, it not only does nothing to stop relationships from breaking down but it actually provides incentives for relationships to break down.

These whores will destroy your life if you let them.

The moment they feel they’ve secured you, that you have no alternative front-hole, and that you’re socially and legally prohibited from looking for their replacement… that’s the moment they’ll decide to stop having sex with you. Sex will become less and less frequent. She’ll never be “in the mood,” she’ll always be tired or with headache. She’ll never treat you the same. She’ll look at you with disdain. She’ll resent you. She’ll feel trapped by you even though you’re the one that’s really trapped. She’ll feel you’re abusive even though she’s the one being abusive.

She’ll file for divorce and she’ll take as much from you as she possibly can, and then she’ll tell everyone you know about how terrible you are. She’ll go fuck some loser that can’t compare to you but that will have more than you because she’ll share the stuff she took from you with him, and they’ll laugh at you every time you go get your kids on the weekends.

Your kids won’t understand why daddy looks so poor now while mommy and her new boyfriend seem so well off. You’ll want to explain to them… but you won’t be able to. You wouldn’t even know where to start.

As time passes, you’ll see how your own kids prefer mommy’s boyfriend. They’ll tell you how funny he is, how many great things they do together, and how much time they spend together. Every time you send them back to her house… you’ll feel like a shadow. An empty human husk trapping the echoes of the man that you once were and mixing them with the cries of the man that you wanted to be.

All because you thought marriage meant something other than your doom.