Henry Kissinger is dead at 100.

I think everyone knows who he is, so there’s not much reason to go through his biography.

There are a lot of Jews that are worse than he was. Though he was pretty bad.

However, it probably wasn’t a great idea to transfer all of the United States’ industry to China. That really didn’t turn out very well.

Or maybe it did?

Now China is the most powerful country in the world, and is serving as a counterbalance to the US Anal Empire.

However, I don’t think that was his goal.

He also supposedly ordered the bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam war. I’m not really sure what purpose that was supposed to serve. Then he got the Nobel Peace Prize for ending the Vietnam war, even though he was mostly responsible for prolonging it.

He might have hated America less than a lot of Jews.

At 100, he tried to stop the conflict between China and the US. He failed, of course.

It was interesting that he was the only US diplomat that the Chinese were willing to talk to.

In general, I think it would be a good idea if non-Jews were responsible for America’s policies. We’ve tried this experiment of putting Jews in charge of everything, and it hasn’t really gone very well.

Now, this is a keen observation.

Fox News:

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger says it was a “grave mistake” for Germany to allow so many migrants in, warning that it creates a “pressure group” in a country — just as Germany has seen pro-Hamas celebrations in the streets.

“It was a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different culture and religion and concepts because it creates a pressure group inside each country that does that,” the 100-year-old former U.S. diplomat said in an interview with Germany’s Welt TV.

Kissinger was born in Germany and fled Nazi Germany as a Jewish refugee with his family before becoming America’s top diplomat under Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford.

He was responding to a question about scenes in Germany where Arab protesters in Berlin streets had, according to Welt, celebrated the recent Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel and handed out candy to participants.

“I don’t have a grievance against the German people. I find celebrations about what happened, which technically was a criminal act, as painful,” he said.

Did Germans really want these people in their country, Henry?

Germany most recently took in significant numbers of migrants, including many from Muslim-majority countries, during the 2015 European migrant crisis — with then-Chancellor Angela Merkel declaring, “Wir schaffen das” or “We can do this.” Kissinger did not specifically mention the 2015 crisis in his remarks.

…

Kissinger told Welt that there must be “some penalty” and “some limitation” for Hamas, but he also warned about escalation in the region.

“The first instinct is to bring back peace, but you can’t make concessions to people who have declared and demonstrated by their actions that there cannot be peace.”

I am against immigration, but I support Palestine.

So to me… it’s kinda all balancing out here.

The Palestine War that is happening – and really hasn’t even gotten started yet – is going to force the ultimate reckoning. Europeans are going to be forced to confront the Jew thing and the immigration thing, and presumably, figure out that the Jews were behind the immigration.

It’s a win-win.

Full interview

Henry Kissinger is told that ‘the Chinese people will never forget you’ by Xi Jinping, during a meeting to discuss US – China relations

Latest videos: https://t.co/c5jZcIaQBa pic.twitter.com/2U5B4x1Q5n

— Sky News (@SkyNews) July 20, 2023

The White House is run by pathetic losers who are going to be constantly showed up by a 100-year-old man.

I can’t imagine anything more embarrassing.

Reuters:

The White House on Thursday expressed regret that Henry Kissinger was able to get more of an audience in Beijing than some sitting U.S. officials, after the former top diplomat held talks in China.

Kissinger — an architect of normalizing ties between Washington and Beijing in the 1970s as secretary of state and national security advisor in the administrations of Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford — was welcomed warmly as an “old friend” by Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday amid efforts by Beijing and Washington to mend frayed ties.

The White House said it was aware of the trip but that it was a private visit by a citizen.

As part of those meetings, Kissinger, 100, also met with China’s top diplomat Wang Yi and with defense minister Li Shangfu, who has declined direct talks with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.

General Li, appointed in March, remains sanctioned by the U.S. over his role in a 2017 weapons purchase from Russia’s largest arms exporter, Rosoboronexport. Chinese officials have repeatedly said they want those sanctions, imposed in 2018, dropped to facilitate discussions.

“It’s unfortunate that a private citizen can meet with the defense minister and have a communication and the United States can’t,” said White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby.

“That is something that we want to solve. This is why we continue to try to get the military lines of communication back open because when they’re not open and you have a time like this when tensions are high, miscalculations also, then the risk goes high.”

Sadly, Kissinger, as good hearted as he may be, cannot stop what is coming.

But it is nice that he showed the world that in reality, the Chinese are very reasonable people.

It is the West who is not reasonable.

The West is run by lunatics who want to blame the Chinese for problems that they created.

🇷🇺🇺🇸 Russian pranksters pretending to be Ukraine’s Zelensky asked Henry Kissinger who he thought was guilty for destroying the Nord Stream pipelines.

Henry Kissinger responded after a long pause: “I thought you were.” pic.twitter.com/EJHJONIKC8

— Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 (@jacksonhinklle) July 11, 2023

Previously: Based Kissinger Says Zelensky Blew Those Pipes

Kissinger is 100 years old and is still somehow the single US diplomat that the Chinese are interested in talking to.

That must be really embarrassing for everyone working for the US government that is under 100 years old.

The Guardian:

The veteran US diplomat Henry Kissinger has met China’s defence minister in Beijing.

According to a readout on Tuesday from the Chinese defence ministry, Li Shangfu said “friendly communication” between China and the US had been “destroyed” because “some people in the United States did not meet China halfway”. Kissinger said he was a “friend of China”, according to the readout.

“Neither the United States nor China can afford to treat the other as an adversary. If the two countries go to war, it will not lead to any meaningful results for the two peoples,” the Chinese statement reported Kissinger as saying.

#LATEST Chinese Defense Minister Li Shangfu meets with visiting former US secretary of state Henry #Kissinger in Beijing on Tuesday. Both sides expressed their commitment to enhancing communication and cooperation, and to exerting their utmost efforts in achieving positive… pic.twitter.com/07lRxFsWnW

— China Daily (@ChinaDaily) July 18, 2023

Kissinger’s visit, which had not been publicised, is outside the official roster of meetings. It is almost exactly 52 years since his secret visit to Beijing in July 1971, which paved the way for Richard Nixon, the US president at the time, to normalise relations between the US and China. More than half a century on, Kissinger is still seen by many in Beijing as a “friend of China”. In May, state tabloid the Global Times praised Kissinger’s “razor-sharp” mind.

Kissinger has repeatedly warned of “catastrophic” consequences of a conflict between the US and China.

The issue is: Kissinger is not going to be alive forever to defuse these situations.

The US government is obsessed with war with China. This is the big focus of the whole machine – even more than on finishing the war with Russia.

I’ve seen no evidence of sanity within the US government – and I’ve been looking.

Robert Daly, Director of the Kissinger Institute on China🇨🇳:

The proposition is that even if China were to change and adopted our constitution and our laws wholesale, we should still try to limit their growth. That is the proposition regardless of their beliefs, we must stop… pic.twitter.com/rrlWdYx5dH

— Going Underground (@GUnderground_TV) July 18, 2023

Russian pranksters Vovan & Lexus pretending to be zelensky called and asked Henry Kissinger: Who do you think is guilty of the Nord Stream explosion?
Henry Kissinger after a long pause: I thought you were. (He meant it was zelensky) 🤷‍️ pic.twitter.com/uvnCHLfN8d

— Roberto (@UniqueMongolia) July 11, 2023

I will never understand how Henry Kissinger has become such a target of the American right-wing.

The man is BASED.

RT:

Veteran US statesman Henry Kissinger said he wouldn’t criticize Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky for blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, according to a video published by a pair of Russian pranksters. The centenarian thought he was talking to the Ukrainian leader himself.

The duo, who go by stage names Vovan and Lexus, posed as the Ukrainian leader during a video conference with Kissinger, they claimed on Monday. A full hour-long episode of their show, which was based on the prank, was released on social media the next day.

According to one of the shown clips, at one point they asked Kissinger whether he believed Moscow blew up its own undersea energy links with Germany last September. At first the centennial former US official seemed hesitant to respond, but the fake Zelensky insisted.

“I, frankly, have thought it was you,” Kissinger finally said, according to the dubbed over translation of the exchange.

How is this guy still on the ball at 100 years old?

People against Kissinger need to be aware of how the Jews themselves view him.

This is from an article published in the Jewish Daily Forward in May, in honor of Kissinger’s 100ish birthday:

In 1985, he publicly supported President Ronald Reagan’s wreath-laying ceremony at a military cemetery in Bitburg, West Germany where members of the Waffen-SS are buried. Kissinger opposed the idea of a United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, because such an institution next to the National Mall in Washington, D.C., might create “too high a profile” for American Jews and “reignite antisemitism.”

Among his statements, one from March 1973 caused a stir when it was published in 2010. Taped in conversation with Richard Nixon soon after a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, Kissinger disdained the notion of pressuring the USSR about persecuted Soviet Jews, saying: “The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy, and if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern.”

In 2011, hitherto secret U.S. State Department documents from late 1972 were likewise published, revealing that Kissinger was irked by the concern expressed by American Jews about the fate of Soviet Jewry, calling the former “self-serving…bastards.”

Walter Isaacson explains that at a contemporaneous meeting of the Washington Special Actions Group, a government crisis task force, Kissinger grumbled, “If it were not for the accident of my birth, I would be antisemitic.” He added: “Any people who has been persecuted for two thousand years must be doing something wrong.”

During a Vietnam War-era chat from October 1973 with Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, Kissinger found American Jews and Israelis “as obnoxious as the Vietnamese.”

In another transcribed telephone conversation from November 1973, Kissinger declared: “I’m going to be the first Jew accused of antisemitism.” This sally reflects obliviousness to the longstanding concept of Jewish self-hatred described by cultural historian Sander Gilman and analyzed in Theodor Herzl’s “The Jewish State” (1896).

Kissinger also mocked those who defended Jews, especially Israelis. One such target was presidential adviser Daniel Patrick Moynihan, whose pro-Israel stance evoked this comment from Kissinger: “We are conducting foreign policy. … This is not a synagogue.”

Kissinger further inquired derisively if the Irish-Catholic Moynihan wished to convert to Judaism. These and other wisecracks led some observers, like Yeshiva University’s Rabbi Norman Lamm to disavow Kissinger as early as December 1975.

If nothing else, Kissinger was a grateful immigrant, which is a rare occurrence.

I don’t know why he never officially converted to Christianity.

Henry Kissinger’s narrative is not coherent at this point.

He was seemingly siding with Russia, then he switched it up and said the Ukraine has to join NATO. Now he’s mixing the seemingly conflicting narratives together.

I guess we need to remember, regardless of what we think of Kissinger (I’m generally positive about his record, or at least not as negative as a lot of people on the right), he is 100 years old, and you can’t expect him to be 100% on the ball.

RT:

Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has explained how his views on prospective NATO membership for Ukraine changed between 2008, when the bloc first acknowledged Kiev’s “aspirations” to join, and today, after the stream of Western military aid transformed it into the “best-armed country” in the region.

“I’m in the ironical position that I was alone when I opposed membership, and I’m nearly alone when I advocate NATO membership,” the veteran politician told a Wall Street Journal contributor in an interview recorded days before his 100th birthday.

“I think the offer to put Ukraine into NATO was a grave mistake and led to this war,” he explained, yet claimed that the scale of the conflict, and “its nature, is a Russian peculiarity, and we were absolutely right to resist it.”

Yes, that doesn’t make sense.

The West caused the war, but the West was also right to fight the war? Maybe the West should learn from its mistakes and stop creating war all over the world.

Isn’t Kissinger the one who said all of this after Vietnam, and then again after the end of the Cold War? And then repeatedly during the attempt to isolate Russia (which began in earnest under Obama)?

But after Washington and its allies turned Ukraine into the “best-armed country in Europe,” it clearly belongs to the US-led military bloc, the former official stated, reiterating his firm belief that peace in Europe cannot be achieved without Ukraine in NATO.

…

Kissinger drew the ire of Kiev last year when he suggested that Ukraine should accept a return to the “status quo ante,” or relinquish its territorial claims to Crimea and grant autonomy to the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, in the name of peace. In an interview with the WSJ he went as far as to claim that “the Ukraine war is won,” but said any peace terms are unlikely to include Crimea.

“For Russia, the loss of Sevastopol, which was always not Ukrainian in history, would be such a comedown that the cohesion of the state would be in danger. And I think that’s not desirable for the world after Ukraine,” he said.

Clearly, Putin has said he’ll start firing off nukes before he surrenders Crimea. All normal people of any seriousness agree that any plan to “take back” Crimea, which was not even “Ukrainian” when it was a part of the Ukraine, is just outrageous and effectively a declaration of World War III.

The only people who support attacking Crimea to try to take that port for the US are people like Victoria Nuland – just totally unhinged Jews.

Putin said in a 2018 interview, on the issue of nuclear war, that if Russia is threatened with destruction, he’s ready to take the whole world down with him.

He said there was no point to a world without Russia, so he would just destroy the entire world.

The West framed this as “chilling” and “crazy,” but it’s obviously just what you have to say when threatened with existential crisis.

It’s like that scene in “Nobody” where he brings the claymore to dinner.

You have to be ready to take everyone down with you. There is no other valid position when your existence is threatened.

Well, some of the Jews appear to believe in an inversion of this – i.e., they would rather be destroyed than allow Russia to continue to exist. That’s where Victoria Nuland seems to fall.

However, even the Jew Antony Blinken won’t say outright that he wants to take back Crimea. Save for the fat retard cheerleading squad that wants to destroy Russia in the name of gay anal fisting for little kids, everyone understands what this would mean if it went beyond rhetoric.

This is to say: I’m not going to give Kissinger too much credit for saying “he’s not going to give Crimea.”

I have no idea why he switched from neutrality to NATO. But it doesn’t even matter. Whatever.

He’s an authority because he’s a relic from when there were “adults in the room,” but he’s also 100 years old and therefore should not really be taken seriously.

It is funny, however, that the Russians and the Chinese consider him one of the only voices in the West worth taking seriously. They just laugh off statements from the Biden people, but when Kissinger speaks, top authorities from both countries feel a need to make an official statement in response.

Ukraine is already a “rump state,” and the only options now are a frozen conflict, ala Korea, or neutrality. The frozen conflict option has been floated around by the media recently, but there is no real chance Russia would accept this under the current circumstances, unless there was some assurance of neutrality. It’s not clear if “frozen conflict” and “neutrality” are 100% mutually exclusive, but they are unlikely to come together.

In theory, you could freeze the conflict and agree to demilitarize on both sides, and that would allow the West to say they haven’t given up yet, and they still consider the lost territories a part of the Ukraine which will be returned at some future date. Putin might agree to that in order to allow the West to save face and also end the conflict. But it’s unlikely the West would honor such an agreement even if they signed it.

The only US politician that the Chinese consider serious enough to even issue a thoughtful response to is 100 years old.

If you think about it for a bit, this really says a lot about what is going on, just as a general matter.

RT:

China has urged against Ukraine joining NATO, saying it would not improve security in the European region, after veteran US diplomat Henry Kissinger claimed membership would serve the interests of both Kiev and Moscow.

Asked about Kissinger’s comments during a Thursday press briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin argued that Ukrainian NATO membership would only further inflame tensions.

“Ukraine should not become the frontier in a major power confrontation,” he said, adding that “to strengthen or even expand military groups is not a viable way to ensure the security of a region. One country’s security should not be achieved at the expense of the security of other countries.”

In an interview with the Economist published on Wednesday, Kissinger said European powers were pursuing a “madly dangerous” strategy by keeping Kiev out of the US-led military bloc, insisting Ukraine must not “become a solitary state just looking out for itself.” He claimed NATO membership would not only benefit Ukraine, but Russia as well.

“If I talked to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin, I would tell him that he, too, is safer with Ukraine in NATO,”the 99-year-old added, saying the move would prevent Kiev from making rash “national decisions on territorial claims.”

The Chinese spokesman went on to state that a “durable European security architecture” could only be created through dialogue. During a visit to Ukraine this week, special envoy Li Hui met with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba and other senior officials to discuss Beijing’s views on a diplomatic resolution to the conflict.

Kissinger is someone who I’ve generally viewed as a non-diabolical Jew. His thinking is Jewish, but it’s always seem to me that he had a sympathetic and respectful view of the America he came to as a kid and grew up in that other Jews simply do not have.

He was the only Jew Richard Nixon would tolerate, and that says a lot. It also, frankly, says a lot that in Germany as a boy, he played for one of the top ranked youth soccer clubs (Jews do not tend to possess any physicality at all, and those who do seem to have at least a slightly better orientation).

He was initially taking what amounted to a “multipolar” view, supporting Ukrainian neutrality, which is considered by the Western media to be “pro-Russian.” He was attacked by the Zelensky regime for various statements. Frankly, having paid attention to this, I do not understand why exactly he is now saying Ukraine should be NATO.

This part about how it would prevent the Zelensky regime from trying to expand its borders is new, and very peculiar, given that it is NATO that is currently demanding the expansion of the Ukraine’s borders.

But okay.

He is 100 years old.

And Jewish, by the way.

A lot of people on the right seem to dislike Henry Kissinger.

I used to have a negative opinion of him, but after having read about his relationship with Richard Nixon, my general opinion leads towards favorable.

He seems to be one of the few Jews you can point to who actually does seem to care about America – or did back then. These days, he’s 100 years old, and all he’s doing is commenting. But the comments I respect, because of his history and status, but I also think they are not coming from a place of evil heartedness.

Of course, while he is strangely lucid for his age, you can’t really expect a 100 year old man to be totally on the ball. (In particular, it is hard for a man of this age, even if he is lucid, to read complicated new information – you’re more likely to get an analysis based on an older understanding of geopolitics, mixed with instinct.) So you take it with a grain of salt.

RT:

Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has told CBS News that the conflict in Ukraine may be approaching a turning point, and that Chinese-brokered peace talks could begin by the end of 2023.

“Now that China has entered the negotiation, it will come to a head, I think by the end of the year,” the 99-year-old diplomat told CBS in an interview broadcast on Sunday. By that time, he continued, “we will be talking about negotiating processes and even actual negotiations.”

I still don’t understand why Americans would agree to let China be the hero, even if they want out of the situation.

They freaked out about China making peace in the Middle East.

Again, Kissinger seems to have been unlikely to register that China – which was a friend or at least basically friendly in his day – is now the ultimate nemesis of America.

With the release of its ‘Position on the Political Settlement of the Ukraine Crisis’ in February, China put itself forward as a potential mediator between Moscow and Kiev. The Chinese plan was rejected outright by the US and EU, while Russian President Vladimir Putin described some of its 12 points as “in tune” with Moscow’s position, and Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky welcomed only a handful of its points, but maintains that Kiev will not compromise with Russia in any way.

Why would any of that change?

The only thing that could change is that the US might want out – specifically to focus on war with China.

But they wouldn’t actually leave, they would let Russia reach the river and then establish some kind of DMZ, which claiming they are going to get Russia later.

The US still refuses to sign a peace treaty ending the war in Korea. Officially, on paper, the US is still at war with North Korea, even though in real terms the war ended 70 years ago.

When Trump was trying to negotiate in Korea – before he was sabotage by John Bolton for literally no reason anyone could explain – his initial goal was to get a pact signed officially ending the war.

Zelensky’s refusal to negotiate with Putin’s government – the Ukrainian leader banned contact with the Kremlin in a decree last October – is just one stumbling block faced by China or any other potential middleman.

Russia considers the conflict in Ukraine a proxy war between itself and NATO, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Friday that any negotiations would not be held “with Zelensky, who is a puppet in the hands of the West, but directly with his masters.”

Yeah.

Zelensky wanted to negotiation both neutrality and surrender of the Donbass in March of 2022. The US told him he wasn’t allowed to do that, then he ended up making a law that it is illegal to negotiate peace with Russia, ever.

In Washington, the administration of President Joe Biden publicly claims that it is up to Ukraine to decide when to seek peace. Zelensky has been offered no incentives by the US to do so, with Biden offering to continue supplying him with weapons “for as long as it takes” to achieve his war aims. Among these aims is the capture of Crimea, a Russian territory since 2014. American military leaders have publicly admitted that the chances of this happening are slim to none.

Yeah, the US has officially – on paper – arranged terms that are designed to ensure an endless war.

And again: even if they decide to scale it down and give up on holding territory on the East side o the river, they are going to declare a DMZ and consider the war ongoing.

Kissinger drew the ire of Kiev last year when he suggested that Ukraine should accept a return to the “status quo ante,” or relinquish its territorial claims to Crimea and grant autonomy to the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, in the name of peace. He has since suggested that these territories become the basis of negotiations after a ceasefire and Russian withdrawal.

Sure, sure.

I’m always interested to hear what Kissinger has to say, but these comments are not particularly interesting.

Unless there was some path to Zelensky having the ability to act autonomously, without the direction of the State Department, a Chinese peace plan is impossible.

Zelensky is in a very difficult position himself, as he has effectively signed the death warrant of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians for reasons that could not be explained to a rational adult with an average IQ.

Taking on the narrative of “take back Crimea” – even whilst the Americans are saying this is impossible – has taken it into Puff the Magic Dragon territory.

This nigga is frolicking in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee while continuing to send tens of thousands of untrained randos he pulled off the street to die in “Bakhmut,” a city already effectively under the full control of Russia.

If Zelensky is killed or flees the country, there’s someone in the Ukraine government who would bring in Xi to clean this shit up. Otherwise, the best we can hope for is a North/South Korea type scenario, where both sides are able to claim victory, and the US moves on to their lunatic plot to start a war with the Chinese.

Henry Kissinger is the best Jew.

That’s not really saying a lot, but it’s true.

RT:

Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has told the Wall Street Journal that Washington has rejected traditional diplomacy, and in the absence of a great leader, has driven the world to the precipice of war over Ukraine and Taiwan.

Kissinger previously courted controversy for suggesting that Kiev abandon some of its territorial claims to end the conflict with Russia.

“We are at the edge of war with Russia and China on issues which we partly created, without any concept of how this is going to end or what it’s supposed to lead to,” Kissinger said in the interview, published on Saturday.

Kissinger, now 99 years old, elaborated on the West’s role in the Ukraine conflict in a recent book profiling prominent post-WWII leaders. He described Russia’s decision to send troops into the country in February as motivated by its own security, as having Ukraine join NATO would move the alliance’s weapons to within 300 miles (480km) of Moscow. Conversely, having Ukraine in its entirety fall under Russian influence would do little to “calm historic European fears of Russian domination.”

Diplomats in Kiev and Washington should have balanced these concerns, he wrote, describing the current conflict in Ukraine as “an outgrowth of a failed strategic dialogue.” Speaking to the Wall Street Journal a month after the book’s publication, Kissinger stood by his insistence that the West should have taken Russian President Vladimir Putin’s security demands seriously, and made it clear that Ukraine would not be accepted into NATO alliance.

In the runup to its military operation in Ukraine, Russia presented the US and NATO with written outlines of its security concerns, which were rejected by both receiving parties.

Kissinger, who in the late 1960s and early 1970s held extensive negotiations with Vietnamese communists even as the US military waged war against them, said that modern American leaders tend to view diplomacy as having “personal relationships with the adversary,” and in words paraphrased by the Wall Street Journal, “tend to view negotiations in missionary, rather than psychological terms, seeking to convert or condemn their interlocutors rather than to penetrate their thinking.”

Instead, Kissinger argued that the US should seek “equilibrium” between itself, Russia, and China.

This term refers to “a kind of balance of power, with an acceptance of the legitimacy of sometimes opposing values,” Kissinger explained. “Because if you believe that the final outcome of your effort has to be the imposition of your values, then I think equilibrium is not possible.”

Kissinger be like “why can’t we just get along?”

This was the only Jew Richard Nixon tolerated.

Henry Kissinger is 98 years old.

It is possible for a Jew to say something different than other Jews. There is no reason for Kissinger to go out there and say this stuff, other than that he believes it, personally.

It’s interesting. It doesn’t really mean anything. I think anyone who tries to fit these statements from Kissinger into the Jewish conspiracy is probably schizophrenic. He’s just a guy saying a thing. It doesn’t mean he’s a good person, or that he’s not a Jew, or whatever. He’s just saying a thing.

If you did fit it into the Jewish conspiracy, you would say he knows that WWIII will be bad for Jews.

But probably he just likes the world of the 1960 and 1970s.

Jews are, in some sense, human beings, I suppose.

Kissinger really screwed-up the whole Sino-Soviet split thingie.

Now, he’s living to see the consequences of that, which is an alliance between China and Russia against a rapidly collapsing Western order.

Kinda funny.

RT:

The West should take Moscow’s interests into account to prevent Russia from becoming “an outpost of China in Europe,” former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has said.

In an interview with the Sunday Times, Kissinger hailed NATO’s united response to Russia’s military offensive in Ukraine and said the alliance should be maintained as it “has grown into an institution reflecting European and American collaboration in an almost unique way.”

“The question will now be how to end that war. At its end a place has to be found for Ukraine and a place has to be found for Russia – if we don’t want Russia to become an outpost of China in Europe.”

The refusal of China to condemn the Russian military offensive in Ukraine and its increasing cooperation with Moscow are the latest items in a long list of disagreements between Washington and Beijing.

…

Commenting on Russia’s military operation in Ukraine, the former secretary of state said that there was “no excuse” for what President Vladimir Putin has done. In his opinion, the Russian leader, whom he had always viewed as “a thoughtful analyst,” is the “head of a declining country” and “he’s lost his sense of proportion in this crisis.”

No he hasn’t.

Also, Russia is not a declining country. It was. But it hasn’t been for nearly a decade now.

Kissinger argued that now, as Europe and America are facing “big issues” in their relations with the Middle East and Asia, it is not in the interest of the US to allow China to further build up its power.

“I do not believe that world domination is a Chinese concept, but it could happen that they become so powerful. And that’s not in our interest,” he said.

Haha.

Yeah, put that cat back in his bag. Let’s see it.

World domination is definitely not a Chinese concept. Well, it’s more that their concept of “world domination” is being the center of a global trade empire. This is opposed to the Western concept of military world domination.

But the West is fixated on putting their back against the wall.

What are they supposed to do?

Kissinger has no doubts that Washington and Beijing are now adversaries but stresses the two superpowers “have a minimum common obligation” to prevent a catastrophic collision from happening. With some countries willing to exploit the rivalry and others seeking aid from one of the superpowers, “we’re heading into a very difficult period,” Kissinger warned.

On Sunday, Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe said that his country was pursuing a path of peaceful development and was not seeking world hegemony. Noting that although China has achieved “significant progress” in nuclear arms development, the minister made it clear that Beijing sticks to a “self-defense policy.” His remarks came the day after US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin stressed that the US was not seeking confrontation with either China or any other countries in the Indo-Pacific region. However, Austin said that amid “growing coercion” from China and its “provocative and destabilizing military activity near Taiwan,” maintaining peace is not just in Washington’s interests but also “a matter of international concern.”

Shut up, nigger.

Taiwan is China.

“We don’t want a war with China but we’ll start a war with China to keep the part of China we stole from China if they ever try to take it back.”

Why is our defense doctrine written by niggers?

Kissinger is right, in terms of the continuation of the Western empire. But no one is listening to him. Instead he’s being attacked as some kind of traitor or something.

I’m glad they’re not listening to Kissinger’s common sense speech, because I want to see this whole thing burned down to the ground. In that sense, whoever is running Washington right now is literally my greatest ally.

I want to see every single city on earth that has child trannies turned into ashes.

God wills it.

There is no more time for repentance.

This now is the time for blood and fire.