St. Rochus daycare in Kerpen

Children are non-sexual, but apparently someone figured out that they can experience sexual stimulation even though they don’t have a sexual drive.

You know who figured that out?

Was it Chinese communists?

Was it Russian authoritarians?

Was it Islamic terrorists?

Or was it the same group digging secret tunnels under New York City for unknown purposes*?

Life Site News:

A Catholic daycare center in Germany planned a masturbation room where children can “pleasure themselves physically.”

The German newspaper Bild recently published parts of the highly controversial education of the daycare center St. Rochus in Kerpen concept.

The sex education concept stated that individual children were allowed to “withdraw into a protected space according to their needs in order to discover and pleasure themselves physically (this is not permitted in public spaces and in the presence of others).”

From the daycare’s site

The concept further states that “when a toddler plays with its private parts and touches them with obvious pleasure, it knows nothing of social taboos, of what is not ‘proper,’ let alone that what it is doing is considered indecent or dirty. It explores and discovers its body and likes to linger where it feels particularly good.”

The case of the daycare center in Kerpen first became public when the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party exposed several daycare centers with highly sexualized “education concepts” in the fall of 2023.

After the concept drew heavy criticism, it was deleted from the kindergarten’s website and has since been “under revision.”

A spokesperson for the city of Kerpen who visited and reviewed the St. Rochus daycare center told Bild that the concept could have been “misinterpreted.”

“For this reason, this concept was removed from the internet in November 2023 and has been under revision ever since,” the spokesperson added.

Asked by Bild, the Archdiocese of Cologne explained that a room “where children can withdraw for physical experiences” does not exist at St. Rochus. However, “In the old concept of the St. Rochus facility, there were formulations that could be misinterpreted.”

Pro-family organization condemns daycare centers for endangering childrenThe German pro-family organization “Demo für Alle” condemned the concept because it sexualizes toddlers and “sexualized children can become victims of pedophiles all the more easily.”

“The daycare concept contains some monstrosities: ‘Doctor games’ and ‘freedom to try out their childish sexuality’ are planned for the children,” Demo für Alle wrote in a statement.

Dolls used at another kindergarten that had a “masturbation room,” as shown in Die Welt last year

The concept furthermore claims that children develop a “sexual identity” at 18 months and “often use sexualized language” from age six.

“Instead of protecting children from this, such a concept promotes the sexualization of even the youngest children!” Demo für Alle noted. “This is highly dangerous in several respects; in particular, sexualized children can all the more easily become victims of paedosexuals.”

“The root of the evil lies in the unproven and dangerous underlying thesis of the daycare concept that children are ‘sexual beings from birth.’ This thesis, which has been exposed as unscientific, goes back to the notorious founder of today’s widespread sex education, Helmut Kentler, who for decades operated a pedo-criminal ring of sex offenders and sexually abused children himself.”

“It is therefore not enough to simply revise such a daycare concept. It is superfluous, harmful, and must be completely scrapped. After all, sex education concepts are voluntary in NRW [North-Rhine Westphalia], unlike protection concepts,” Demo für Alle concluded.

WHO promotes ‘early childhood masturbation’The idea of “masturbation rooms” for very small children and other perverse “sexual education” concepts is not limited to several German daycare centers.

The 2010 WHO sex-ed guidelines for Europe call for sexual education from birth and advises educators to teach infants and toddlers about “early childhood masturbation.”

*It was the tunnelers.

The “French” tunneler and 1968 movement leader Daniel Cohn-Bendit is a very obvious example. He wrote about pioneering “exploring sexuality” with kindergarten kids.

There was a lot of this going on with Jews in France and Germany in the 1960s and 1970s.

Jews were also doing it Germany in the 1920-30s when a certain man with a mustache put an end to that funny business.

Germany has been the prime target for this kind of thing since they lost the war

They stopped this in Hanover, but other parts of Germany are more “liberal” on the matter

You thought it wasn’t real.

You thought they weren’t really stripping down toddlers and telling them to jack each other off.

Well.

Fox News:

Several daycare centers in Germany are reportedly considering or have already implemented “sexual exploration rooms” where children can engage in sexual games and discover what they find pleasurable.

According to several reports, two nurseries in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia have discussed plans to promote safe spaces where young children can explore masturbation.

When asked for comment by the German newspaper Die Welt, the North Rhine-Westphalia children’s ministry, headed by Green Josephine Paul, said the “sexual behavior by children” could not be “prevented” and said they had no intention of contacting the daycare centers.

“Where men give birth and “man and woman” is taboo” reads the title of the article from Die Welt, while also showing these handpuppets that are used for “education”

Die Welt reported that one daycare in Kerpen offers children the “freedom to try out childish sexuality.” The daycare also said that sexual self-pleasure on its property is of “great importance,” insisting that “masturbation is normal.”

The website REMIX noted that another daycare in Germany, found in the town of Rheinberg, facilitates “doctor games” where children are urged to peruse other students’ bodies. The nursery allegedly encouraged kids to choose a specific student whose body they wished to explore “carefully” but warned them “no objects are to be introduced into body orifices.”

Pro Familia, Germany’s leading professional association on sexuality and partnership, initially issued recommendations that daycares set up “body exploration rooms” and “sexual games” for kids in July, REDUXX initially reported.

Parents voiced concerns about the “exploration rooms” in June when the news outlet BILD published an email from an Arbeiterwohlfahrt (AWO) daycare center in the Hanover region of Germany.

The email, sent to parents, showed ten rules detailing how children in the rooms would be encouraged to “pet and examine” themselves and other young students.

The list of rules, as shown on Reduxx

“All children, especially preschoolers, are aware of the places in the facility where nudity and body exploration can take place. Each child decides for themselves whether and with whom they want to play physical and sexual games. Girls and boys pet and examine each other only as much as is comfortable for themselves and other children,” the guidance read in part.

Yeah, so – it’s “sexual consent” for toddlers.

Meanwhile, there are nonstop news stories about how it is “rape” when a teenager has sex with someone over 18.

It’s a utopia, you see.

The organization is called “Pro Familia,” but all of the videos on their YouTube channel are about abortion, contraception, and faggotry

Now, come on, bigot.

This is just common sense sexual education.

Reduxx:

Germany’s leading professional association on sexuality and partnership, Pro Familia, is under fire after issuing a recommendation that daycares implement “body exploration rooms” and “sexual games” for young children.

The issue first came to light when news outlet BILD revealed that parents were sent an e-mail from an Arbeiterwohlfahrt (AWO) daycare center in the Hanover region which presented a list of ten rules explaining how children in the “body exploration room” would be encouraged to “pet and examine” themselves and other children.

Obviously, pedophiles would invent this sort of thing.

But that doesn’t mean pedophiles did invent it.

(In all reality, it was probably invented by millennial white women on behalf of pedophiles. We’re seeing a pattern there.)

“All children, especially preschoolers, are aware of the places in the facility where nudity and body exploration can take place,” reads the message. “Each child decides for themselves whether and with whom they want to play physical and sexual games. Girls and boys pet and examine each other only as much as is comfortable for themselves and other children.”

The list of rules

Other rules outlined in the communication stipulate that the children must be within the same age group with a gap of no more than two years, and that at no time should a child “stick anything into another child’s body openings.”

Hahaha.

One shocked father told BILD, “My daughter is five years old. I don’t want boys groping her. I have another child in another daycare center [where] there is no such thing [as an exploration room].”

Another father responded, “I’m devastated. We were told that this was determined by the Ministry of Education. As parents we were intimidated. What options do you have if you don’t want this?”

Uhhhhh…

Options are pretty limited, actually.

The Ministry of Education in Lower Saxony responded to the concerned parents by terminating the program before it was put into effect. A representative told BILD that, at the end of May, “the state youth welfare office reported to the Ministry of Education that the pedagogical concept of the physical exploration rooms in the daycare centers cannot last, and that this puts the well-being of the child at risk.”

However, Dirk von der Osten, Chairman of the Board of the AWO Region in Hannover, disagreed. “Exploring one’s own body is part of child development, during which they also learn to recognize their own limits, to express them clearly and to develop shame,” von der Osten said. “Children also play role-playing games in their group rooms. We do not see any child welfare endangerment in this.”

This is what every child group in Germany is saying.

Meanwhile, the Catholic churches in Germany are flying anal flags.

This is not the first time a policy recommended by Pro Familia has been called into question. In 2013, Deutsche Welle asserted that “Pro Familia is stuck in the pedophilia swamp,” and emphasized how the sexual education organization has repeatedly published the works of pro-pedophile lobbyists.

The Berlin newspaper Tagesspiegel investigated articles published by Pro Familia Magazine and found that pro-pedophile views were represented in works released in the 1980s and 1990s. An article by the psychologist and educator Wolf Vogel, dating back to 1987, for example, reflects “without prejudice” on the causes of pedophile lust.

Pro Familia has also platformed Rüdiger Lautmann, a sociologist and gay rights advocate who has a lengthy history of normalizing pedophilia.

Every “pedophile activist” is a homosexual.

There is no such thing as “heterosexual pedophilia.”

It’s an absolute myth, invented by homosexuals to defend their own practices.

Lautmann authored a book titled The Lust for Children: A Portrait of Pedophiles. The book is based on his interviews with 60 men who admitted to sexually abusing young children, primarily boys.

Rüdiger Lautmann

“They really love the children, read their every wish, organize trips, buy toys and are only comfortable around children,” Lautmann says of the 60 pedophiles he interviewed.

Released in 1994, the book became popular with pedophiles for its sympathetic portrayal of adult attraction to children, which Lautmann described as a sexual orientation, and its repeated assertions that children are capable of sexual autonomy.

“For me, it is is very clear that there do exist relationships that do not require any intervention,” Lautmann wrote, “The children cling to their lovers, and can leave them any moment if they choose.”

These arguments always rely on Ancient Greece, where people made the same arguments during certain periods.

In 1995, Lautmann repeated the thesis of his book in an article for Pro Familia, a leading NGO which provides resources on sexual health. In Pro Familia’s official magazine, Lautmann’s article states: “Our study defines the term pedophile, distinguishes it from incest, abuse and sadism. We prove that such men exist. The thesis is therefore: The desire for a child is an independent and differentiated sexual form. Pedophilia is therefore a sexual orientation like any other and no longer a perversion.”

An article by Lautmann was again published by Pro Familia in 2013, titled “sexual research can change reality.”

I remember a German girl telling me all this stuff in around 2011. This is not new in the mainstream of German education, it’s just that all of the women who learned it ten years ago are now running the institutions.

It’s not going to stop.

I’ve seen people argue that the boomers are exaggerating when they say “pedophilia is the next stop on the slippery slope.”

The reality is, we are already way past pedophilia with the child tranny movement.

Here’s the basic question: would you rather have some dude fuck you up the ass, or would you rather be injected with hormones, grow breasts, and have your dick cut off?

Obviously, no one wants some dude fucking them up the ass. But it’s also not really a serious choice between that and having your dick cut off.

That’s the total bottom line of the sexual liberation movement: child trannies are the worst thing ever imaginable, so everything that is not that bad – including adult men sodomizing little boys – is de facto acceptable now.

Just watch.

You’ll live to see it.

First you hear about these child sex rooms at German daycares, then you learn that actually, there are adult homosexual men in the sex rooms helping the boys “explore” themselves.

Snake Baker contributed to this article.

Rüdiger Lautmann

People have a right to know that their children are safe in the hands of homosexual pedophiles.

Reduxx:

A gay rights organization in Berlin, Germany, is set launch a new pilot program next spring by opening two daycare centers with a special focus on providing the children education on LGBT issues. But disturbingly, an academic with a lengthy history of normalizing pedophilia is one of three people on the board overseeing the organization.

Earlier this year, Berlin’s Gay Counseling Services (Berliner Schwulenberatung), an LGBT rights group which has been serving the gay community for 40 years, announced it would be launching a “diverse” living space in Berlin’s Südkreuz area in 2023.

Roughly translated to the “Diverse Living Place,” the complex will host 69 apartments, a dedicated geriatric facility, a restaurant, and more — all of which will aim to provide “multigenerational housing for homosexual, bisexual, transsexual and intersex (LGBTI*)” people. The stated goal of the initiative is to create a space where residents can live “without fear of exclusion due to sexual or gender identity.”

In addition to living quarters and common areas, the Place will also have two daycare centers to accommodate approximately 90 children in total. The daycare facilities will have a specialized focus on LGBT education.

“Many schools and daycare centers still struggle to educate when it comes to homosexuality, transsexuality, and intersex with respect with children,” the daycare’s about page reads, “We want to change that now.”

It continues: “The topic of LGBTI* is not a subject that is only for adults. Everyone is responsible for one’s own identity, own wishes and ideas about life, love, friendship and partnership, even the smallest among us.”

The concept for the daycare pilot program was coordinated with Berlin’s Senate Department for Youth, Education and Family.

Disturbingly, one of the members of the board overseeing and sponsoring the Gay Counseling Services and their project is Rüdiger Lautmann, a German sociologist and gay rights advocate who has a lengthy history of normalizing pedophilia.

Lautmann is a former professor at the University of Bremen, where he taught from 1971 to 2001. Most notably, Lautmann authored a book titled The Lust for Children: A Portrait of Pedophiles. The book is based on his interviews with 60 men who admitted to sexually abusing young children, primarily boys.

“They really love the children, read their every wish, organize trips, buy toys and are only comfortable around children,” Lautmann says of the 60 pedophiles he interviewed.

Released in 1994, the book became popular with pedophiles for its sympathetic portrayal of adult attraction to children, which Lautmann described as a sexual orientation, and its repeated assertions that children are capable of sexual autonomy.

“For me, it is is very clear that there do exist relationships that do not require any intervention,” Lautmann wrote, “The children cling to their lovers, and can leave them any moment if they choose.”

In his book, Lautmann seeks to categorize what types of children pedophiles are attracted to, and conducted in-depth surveys of pedophiles on the characteristics, body types, and personality traits they most desired.

He features dozens of direct quotes from the pedophiles he interviewed graphically describing the sex acts they performed with the children they abused, some as young as 4 years-old.

“Even with a four-year-old something can happen,” Lautmann writes, “The pedophile, of course, wants his penis to be stimulated manually or orally. Only rarely will the children comply with this.”

Lautmann describes cues for “childish consent,” and suggests that pedophiles do not use force to secure compliance from children, but instead allows them to lead sexual activity.

“The vast majority of the encounters described appear to be based on consent,” Lautmann writes, prefacing descriptions of child sexual abuse by his interviewees. He also rejects the “prevailing line,” which he describes as an “unsatisfactory” argument that children are incapable of giving consent, stating that it is “based on deductions from normative foundations.” Lautmann also accuses “campaigns against child abuse” of “profiting” from the “strictness and simplicity” of current laws.

“Excited and attractively dressed, these little people – not to mention all their other qualities – embody something of the sensual side of our world; at least that’s how children are staged today,” writes Lautmann. “Pedophilia brings out something that no one wanted, but which objectively follows from the desire to beautify childhood.”

Following the book’s release, Lautmann spoke at an event hosted by pro-pedophile advocacy organization, the Specialist and Support Group for Pedophilia (Fach Und Selbsthilfegruppe Paedophilie).

In 1995, Lautmann repeated the thesis of his book in an article for Pro Familia, a leading NGO which provides resources on sexual health. In Pro Familia’s official magazine, Lautmann’s article states: “Our study defines the term pedophile, distinguishes it from incest, abuse and sadism. We prove that such men exist. The thesis is therefore: The desire for a child is an independent and differentiated sexual form. Pedophilia is therefore a sexual orientation like any other and no longer a perversion.”

Eventually, Lautmann was forced to distance himself from his work after facing tremendous backlash. But he continued working closely with other prominent figures in the push to normalize pedophilia as an oppressed sexual orientation.

Throughout his career, Lautmann maintained a close relationship with notorious pedophile sexologist Helmut Kentler.

Beginning in 1969, Kentler’s project had placed foster children in the homes of pedophiles in an attempt to test his theory that pedophiles could make good foster fathers. Kentler had theorized that the pedophile’s attraction to children would result in a strong drive to take care of them.

“These people were able to put up with these [mentally] retarded boys only because they were in love with them, infatuated with them, crazy about them,” Kentler explained in 1970.

He also suspected the children would develop meaningful, loving relationships with their pedophile foster fathers, and would not experience any negative consequences if sexually abused by them.

Kentler’s project was approved by the Berlin Senate, and the pedophile foster fathers received monthly allowances from the government to care for the orphaned children.

Lautmann was also involved in a 1979 motion calling for the deletion of Section 176 of the German legal code, which would effectively eliminate the age of consent — a political goal that was supported by Kentler.

In 2008, Lautmann wrote Kentler’s obituary for the Humanist Union (HU), the board of which he sat on at the time. The Union describes itself as an “independent civil rights organization,” but had maintained coordination with a working group on human sexuality which explicitly advocated for the legalization of adult-child sex.

In addition to serving in a leadership position for the HU, Lautmann was a member of the pedophile lobbying organization Humane Sexuality Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Humane Sexualität, AHS), a research project which pushed the narrative that “pedosexual contacts” could be “consensual” despite the age and power difference between a child and an adult. Lautmann published for the magazine, advocating for a legal separation between sex offenders and pedophiles. The HU only officially distanced itself from the AHS in 2004 following concerns over optics.

Lautmann has often warned against “moral panic” – a term often used in pedophile circles to portray those with child safeguarding concerns as unreasonable.

News of Lautmann’s position on the board spearheading the LGBT daycare centers featured prominently on the website of an active pro-pedophile lobbying group, Krumme-13 (K13Online), in a post which asserts that leaders within the organization “welcome the objectives” of the childcare facilities.

Krumme-13 advocates for lowering the age of consent to 12, and states: “Children from the age of 12 can decide for themselves whether they want to enter into a pedosexual relationship or not. Children’s right to sexual self-determination must be protected by the Basic Law.”

They’re apparently just promoting this everywhere now.

I blame the communist Chinese.