A Hamilton County judge permanently struck down Ohio’s so-called “Heartbeat” law that banned most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, saying it conflicts with the constitutional amendment passed by Ohio voters.
More : https://t.co/mpdb7NPFn9 pic.twitter.com/x3OMbKFAuW

— WSYX ABC 6 (@wsyx6) October 24, 2024

Universal suffrage democracy is always a tyranny, because the vast majority of peasants have no stake in the society. This is why in the original American republic, only landowners were allowed to vote. Landowners are going to necessarily be more intelligent people than landless peasants, and they are also going to have a stake in the future of society.

If you have mass media and allow not only peasants but women to vote, you just have a ridiculous and cartoonish system where the outcomes of elections are based on people’s emotions. You also have a system where no one can be blamed for anything, and no one has any ability to petition grievances. It’s the worst of all worlds.

The lack of any meaningful oversight whatsoever allowed democracy governments to form these various organizations like the CIA and the various other intelligence agencies, as well as massive bureaucracies, which are totally unaccountable to anyone at all, and are a black box. If every single congressman was replaced with an upstanding citizen, they could in theory vote to abolish the CIA and fire everyone who works in various departments, but there is no way under the current system anyone but shills will win elections. Further, the fact that the intelligence agencies exist now means that every government official can be blackmailed or threatened into going along with the program.

It is all broken.

I’m totally against universal suffrage democracy. I think a “democratic republic” where only landowners can vote is probably fine, though an “autocracy” like China is also fine.

Note: China has social mobility without voting in national elections. The fundamental problem with traditional monarchy and a system of nobility is that there is no social mobility, and the only people who can move up are peasant women lucky enough to get pregnant by a noble. China has developed a system that is basically monarchy but without a strictly defined class system. Please also note that the idea that monarchies are oppressive is simple nonsense. Democracy is the most oppressive system. A lack of social mobility might be “oppression” in some vague sense, but the idea that monarchs were ever able to do whatever they wanted is just a lie.

This all having been said, the United States and now the West as a whole has moved drastically away from the established norms of universal suffrage democracy and into a system of dikastocracy, where the government is run by judges. Random judges no one has ever heard of can just override the laws introduced by the democracy government.

Reuters:

An Ohio judge permanently struck down the state’s ban on abortion after about six weeks on Thursday and criticized its Republican attorney general for attempting to circumvent the will of Ohioans who voted to enshrine abortion protections in the state constitution.

Judge Christian Jenkins of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in Cincinnati said, opens new tab the Republican-backed 2019 state law would interfere with women’s ability to receive abortions and discourage doctors from performing them, in violation of a constitutional amendment approved by voters last year.

The office of Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, a Republican, acknowledged that the ban itself could not stand in light of the ballot initiative, but had argued that 14 other provisions of the state law should be upheld.

Those included requirements to have doctors check for fetal heartbeats before performing abortions, inform patients seeking abortions when their fetuses are viable, and have patients wait 24 hours after seeing a doctor before undergoing an abortion.

Jenkins said those provisions were unconstitutional because the ballot measure’s broad wording prohibits any burden on the ability to exercise the right to have an abortion.

This is a garbled mess.

The constitutional amendment was passed in November of 2023, a non-election year, with 56% of the vote. Now, a year later, this rando judge decides that it overrides the 2019 law passed by the state legislature. The 2019 6-week law was passed before the overturning of Roe v. Wade, as a “trigger law” that would come into effect if Roe was overturned and states were again allowed to regulate abortion.

According to the way the system is setup now, the judge is presumably correct that the constitutional amendment overrides the 2019 law. But why is it up to him, and not put to a referendum? Why did it take the courts a year to decide something that is obvious?

There was debate about the rules, so allowing one guy no one has ever heard of to be the ultimate decider who can permanently dictate state law does not make any sense.

When Texas passed this law, everyone said “countdown to a federal judge ruling it illegal.”

Who knew it would happen so quickly?

AP:

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered Texas to suspend the most restrictive abortion law in the U.S., calling it an “offensive deprivation” of a constitutional right by banning most abortions in the nation’s second-most populous state since September.

The order by U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman is the first legal blow to the Texas law known as Senate Bill 8, which until now had withstood a wave of early challenges. In the weeks since the restrictions took effect, Texas abortion providers say the impact has been “exactly what we feared.”

In a 113-page opinion, Pitman took Texas to task over the law, saying Republican lawmakers had “contrived an unprecedented and transparent statutory scheme” by leaving enforcement solely in the hands of private citizens, who are entitled to collect $10,000 in damages if they bring successful lawsuits against abortion providers who violate the restrictions.

The law, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in May, prohibits abortions once cardiac activity is detected, which is usually around six weeks, before some women even know they are pregnant.

“From the moment S.B. 8 went into effect, women have been unlawfully prevented from exercising control over their lives in ways that are protected by the Constitution,” wrote Pitman, who was appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama.

“That other courts may find a way to avoid this conclusion is theirs to decide; this Court will not sanction one more day of this offensive deprivation of such an important right.”

To be fair, the point of the law was to get it ruled against by a judge, which would then result in it getting pushed up to the Supreme Court, which conservatives think will overturn Roe v. Wade based on its current supposedly conservative makeup.

The conversation is largely pointless, given the general state of everything else in this country.

If the court overturns Roe, it will just create this massive, endless distraction, and will not actually result in fewer abortions.

Doesn’t apply.

— TennisBuff (@MichaelPWealth) October 7, 2021

While we resist and persist, I'll take the joys and triumphs we can. We celebrate today, we're back to work tomorrow. We got this, abortion isn't going anywhere. And it's our power as a community of rights-conscious people that will keep it safe and accessible. ✌️

— Alistair SM J 🌈 ♿ (@Essem_Jay) October 7, 2021

I’ve been seeing this phase a lot, so conservatives can probably relate to it. Abortion “is the law of the land, if you don’t like it, leave”. Did I do it right?

— Jake (@JakeDPowers) October 7, 2021

Frankly, abortion laws don’t matter anyway at this point, because the unvaxed don’t want abortions, and the vaxed can’t get pregnant.

Not trying to rain on anyone’s Crusade here. The whole thing just really feels like an organized distraction.

Governor Cripple is distracting from his open border, and if the Democrats don’t have some patriarchy boogieman to fight, their whole operation implodes in on itself.

The feds have already said they will disregard any SCOTUS ruling they don’t like. But they would like Roe ban, as it would distract the masses of fickle goyim.

There is an ongoing and blatant assault on women’s bodily autonomy that seeks to deny them their vagina-given right to murder their own babies.

AP:

If a new Mississippi law survives a court challenge, it will be nearly impossible for most pregnant women to get an abortion there.

Or, potentially, in neighboring Louisiana. Or Alabama. Or Georgia.

The Louisiana legislature is halfway toward passing a law — like the ones enacted in Mississippi and Georgia — that will ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, about six weeks into a pregnancy and before many women know they’re pregnant. Alabama is on the cusp of approving an even more restrictive bill.

State governments are on a course to virtually eliminate abortion access in large chunks of the Deep South and Midwest. Ohio and Kentucky also have passed heartbeat laws; Missouri’s Republican-controlled legislature is considering one.

Bbbb-but pro-choice demons told me fetuses were just clump of cells! How can they have a heartbeat when they’re only six weeks old?

Already, Mississippi mandates a 24-hour wait between an in-person consultation. That means women must make at least two trips to her clinic, often traveling long distances.

Whoa, TWO FULL TRIPS to the clinic!?

What kind of primitive patriarchal society of women-hating, closeted homosexual pigs with fragile masculinity syndrome would require its women to make two full trips to a clinic to get an abortion?

This shows you we still have much Progress to make.

Women should be able to abort their babies by pushing a button from some app on their smartphone. This is current year, not the Middle Ages.

Other states have passed similar, incremental laws restricting abortion in recent years, and aside from Mississippi, five states have just one clinic — Kentucky, Missouri, North and South Dakota, and West Virginia. But the latest efforts to bar the procedure represent the largest assault on abortion rights in decades.

Lawmakers sponsoring the bans have made it clear their goal is to spark court challenges in hopes of ultimately overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

Those challenges have begun. Derzis’ attorneys are scheduled to go before a judge on May 21, seeking to prevent Mississippi’s heartbeat law from taking effect July 1.

A judge in Kentucky blocked enforcement of that state’s heartbeat ban after the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit on behalf of the clinic in Louisville.

Similar legal action is expected before bans can take effect in Ohio and Georgia, where Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed the latest heartbeat bill into law Tuesday. Kemp said he welcomed the fight, vowing: “We will not back down.”

Georgia’s ban doesn’t take effect until Jan. 1. But the impact was immediate.

An abortion clinic operated by The Women’s Centers in Atlanta began receiving anxious calls from patients soon after Kemp signed the law. Many callers had plans to travel from outside the state for abortions. Georgia’s heartbeat ban would have a wider impact because the state has 17 abortion clinics — more than the combined total in the other four Southern states that have passed or are considering bans.

Oh, the horror! Women will have to give birth to their kids instead of killing and removing them in pieces.

Is this Nazi Germany?!

Advocates for abortion rights expect judges to halt enforcement of any new bans while lawsuits work their way through the courts. That could take years.

“These laws are blatantly unconstitutional,” said Elisabeth Smith, chief counsel for state policy and advocacy for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which also has filed suit over Mississippi’s ban. “But if they were allowed to go into force, they would have devastating consequences for the residents of all of these states.”

In the modern world, banning the killing of humans with a heartbeat is blatantly unconstitutional if Moloch can feed on them.

“I’m not asking you to support access to abortion,” King-Shepherd said. “I’m only asking you to let women, their families, their physicians and their God make this decision on how they want to start their families in private and trust them to do that.”

Women can already make that decision. They can:

• Have sex or not
• Take birth control pills or not
• Demand the use of condoms or not
• Use any form of contraception or not

By the time a woman is pregnant, she already started her family. She already made those decisions.

Asking for an abortion is asking for the possibility of destroying the family she already started and pretending it never happened.

It’s a type of feminine time travel.

Women are currently killing their babies because they want to continue whoring around and working some irrelevant office job. Their decisions on how and when to start their families are wrong — just like most of the decisions they make — and you can verify this by checking out white birthrates anywhere. These “decisions” we allow them to “make” are driving us to extinction.

The entire concept of feminism is that women should have all of the powers of men with zero of the responsibilities. Thus, banning abortion effectively kills the entire feminist program, which is why they are so obsessed with it.