Then entire medical establishment is geared towards keeping homosexuals and boomers alive forever. It’s big money.

If boomers were healthier, they wouldn’t need all of this medical intervention. If they were healthier, they would also probably realize how stupid it is to live to be 100 years old.

The Guardian:

Baby boomers are living longer but are in worse health than previous generations were at the same age, despite advances in medicine and greater awareness of healthy lifestyles, a global study shows.

Researchers found people in their 50s and 60s were more likely to have serious health problems than people who were born before or during the second world war when they reached that age.

The results cannot be explained by people living longer, experts at the University of Oxford and University College London (UCL) said. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, cancer, heart disease and other diseases were all affecting people at younger ages.

Rates of illness and disability increased across successive generations during the last century, according to the findings published in the Journals of Gerontology.

…

Researchers analysed health data for more than 100,000 people between 2004 and 2018, covering several generations of people aged 50 and above across England, the US and Europe.

They found increasing rates of chronic disease, especially when comparing people born between 1936 and 1945 and those born from 1955 to 1959.

…

Levels of grip strength, a good measure of overall muscle strength and healthy ageing, decreased across generations in England and the US, but either increased or remained constant in Europe.

The children of the boomers are going to die much younger, in part because they don’t have the money for all of these medical interventions and in another part because their boomer parents fed them poison slop when they were small children, something that the boomer’s own parents did not do to them.

in 1939, men were a whopping eating 3500 calories a day and only weighed 150 lbs…

families were eating 4 pounds of sugar a week, up to 10 pounds of meat, up to 10 pounds of flour, 10 quarts of milk, 2 dozen eggs…

yet less than 10% of people were obese vs 40% today

our… pic.twitter.com/5uzvU3oN9u

— Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ️🦙 (@AlpacaAurelius) March 31, 2024

Obesity rates have increased across the world over the last 50 years, but at varying speeds and from different starting positions.

The chart shows the change in the share of adults who are defined as “overweight” or “obese” across a range of countries. It is based on the latest… pic.twitter.com/rihNwxW8kF

— Our World in Data (@OurWorldInData) September 30, 2024

There is growing evidence that a common artificial sweetener is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.
Lead researcher Dr. Stanley Hazen explains how erythritol affects the body differently than sugar.
Read more: https://t.co/pwzrocIxYf pic.twitter.com/hMdZqJigx1

— Cleveland Clinic (@ClevelandClinic) August 8, 2024

Related: Study: Maniacal Artificial Sweetener Xylitol Could Double Risk of Heart Attacks, Strokes, Death

This whole artificial sweetener thing is such a stupid scam. Your body registers it as a sweetener. All of this stuff is processed by your brain. I don’t know why this is confusing. I guess it’s simply that people are stupid.

Here’s what happens: even if it has zero calories, your body thinks it’s a sweetener, because it’s designed to make your body think that. So it raises your blood glucose levels, which leads to artery hardening, and it increases insulin resistance. The fact that it is zero calories is virtually irrelevant. It’s only 150 calories in a can of soda pop in the first place, and the problem (at least with habitual consumption) is that it’s pure sugar.

If you actually wanted some kind of chemical “solution” that would allow you to consume unlimited amounts of sugary food and not cause obesity, you would need some kind of neural manipulation drug that would tell your brain to just immediately turn sugars into feces, rather than storing them as fat. (Although such a drug would presumably be totally impossible, because telling your brain to tell your body to never produce any glucose would kill you, and figuring out how to regulate levels would be impossible, and you might as well just start selling soda pop with an insulin needle attached to it.)

You understand the basic nature of fat: this is your body storing calories for future use. If you are eating like an American eats, your brain assumes you are preparing for a long period where you will not have access to food. It is storing calories as fat cells for future use. This goes back to ancient times, when people would sometimes overeat, and put a bit of fat on their bodies, because they knew there was a period of no food coming in the future. As you age, your lip turnover rate decreases, so you store more fat, because your body assumes you’re not going to be out hunting or fishing or collecting berries quite as much as a young person.

Bottom line: if you want the sugar, and you can’t resist it, just drink the normal soda pop. Ideally, you get one with cane sugar instead of corn syrup, because that is better. But these artificial sugars are much worse than sugar. Sugar doesn’t cause cancer or dementia, it just makes you fat, and the artificial sweeteners are going to make you fat anyway by telling your brain to build insulin resistance and raise blood glucose levels.

CNN:

Consuming a drink with erythritol — an artificial sweetener used to add bulk to stevia and monk fruit and to sweeten low-carb keto products — more than doubled the risk of blood clotting in 10 healthy people, according to a new pilot study.

Clots can break off blood vessels and travel to the heart, triggering a heart attack, or to the brain, triggering a stroke. Previous research has linked erythritol to a higher risk of stroke, heart attack and death.

“What is remarkable is that in every single subject, every measure of platelet responsiveness (clotting) went up following the erythritol ingestion,” said lead study author Dr. Stanley Hazen, director of the Center for Cardiovascular Diagnostics and Prevention at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute.

Consuming a drink with an equal amount of glucose, or sugar, did not affect blood platelet activity in another group of 10 people, said Hazen, who is also the Jan Bleeksma chair in vascular cell biology and atherosclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic.

“This is the first direct head-to-head comparison of the effects of ingesting glucose versus ingesting erythritol on multiple different measures of platelet function,” Hazen said. “Glucose doesn’t impact clotting, but erythritol does.”

This was already known about the previous “artificial sweeteners.” These things get a bad name, like aspartame, and then they release a new version that is basically the exact same thing and say “no but this one is the real magic chemical.”

I’m against all processed foods. I mean, if you want to hit up McDonald’s breakfast or have a pizza once or twice a month, that won’t kill you, but in general, you want to keep that shit to a minimum if you want to be healthy and not fat.

Any of these “low fat” or “low calorie” alternatives just make things worse. If you want the soda, just drink the soda. Just don’t drink it every day.

You should really find something else to enjoy. Switch out the soda pop for coffee, tea, or vodka, for example.

Xylitol, a sugar alcohol found in many foods, associated with almost double the risk of heart attacks, strokes, and death in people who consume the highest amounts.

Takeaway?

Eat. Real. Food.https://t.co/1CSdg5Rg9P.

— Chris Palmer, MD (@ChrisPalmerMD) June 7, 2024

What makes me angriest about this is that there is a war on smoking.

I’ve never said smoking was healthy. I might have said that, actually. There are health benefits. But while I do not accept that “nicotine causes cancer” (those are rat studies that you can look into – no human has ever gotten cancer from non-cigarette nicotine exclusively), I do accept that inhaling any kind of particulate matter into your lungs is probably not the best thing to do.

This has turned into this whole thing, where they say marijuana smoke is healthier than cigarette smoke, and that is just obvious bullshit. THC probably doesn’t cause cancer (I’ve seen no evidence that it does), but neither does nicotine. The issue is the inhaling of smoke, which contains particulate matter, into your lungs – and there is a whole helluva lot more particulate matter in weed than in cigarettes. Have you ever seen someone hit a bong? They go into coughing fits. Even smoking a joint people start coughing. They say it makes them higher, which I can probably accept as logical, but that is clearly not healthy. It would be the same thing if they were choking on smoking from burning wood. Smoke inhalation, or any kind, is probably not especially healthy, all things considered, and it could lead to tumor formation.

However: cigarettes are like the least unhealthy thing on the market.

I don’t do the vape thing anymore, unless I’m in some fascist hotel or a movie theater or something, because I don’t know what the hell that shit is. But normal cigarettes are a lot healthier than sugar or seed oils or soy or any of these processed foods.

Official studies show that 14% of smokers die from smoking. I don’t believe that at all, I think the number is way lower, because in America, mostly working class or poor people smoke, and those people are way more likely to experience continued exposure to industrial chemicals. There is no “cancer smoking” study that controls for exposure to industrial chemicals, meaning all of these studies are worthless, and I think you effectively have almost no chance of dying from smoking, because various other old age diseases will kill you first.

Regardless: even if it is 14%, that is so, so much healthier than being obese.

The war on smoking is like the “coronavirus vaccine” campaign. It’s a huge scam.

The question is: why are they so obsessed with smoking.

Who would have thought injecting yourself with end-of-life cancer drugs and various extreem hormone cocktails in an untested way could have unintended consequences?

New York Post:

Transgender women taking gender-affirming hormones like estrogen are up to 95% more likely to suffer from heart disease compared to cisgender men, researchers have found.

A study published in the European Journal of Endocrinology showed that all trans people were at a “significantly higher risk” of a host of serious and potentially deadly medical conditions, including heart attacks and strokes.

The authors used health data from 2,671 trans people in their early to mid-20s living in Denmark.

They then compared the rate of heart disease seen in the trans patients to a control group of 26,700 people.

The increased risk of any type of heart disease was higher in both transgender men and women as compared with the control group, the study found.

Transgender women taking estrogen had a 93% increased risk of heart problems versus control men, and a 73% higher risk when measured against control women.

Transgender men taking testosterone had a 2.2 times increased risk of cardiovascular ailments compared with control men, and a 63% increased risk compared with control women.

If it’s male trannies in their 20s, the the problems might be more related to Lupron, what they call a “puberty blocker” which is actually a repurposed cancer drug. It causes all kinds of problems.

Androgen deprivation (lowering the testosterone levels) in men to fight prostate cancer has been known for a decade to cause serious heart problems.

Maybe it’s worth the risk if you’re also risking dying of prostate cancer. Can’t imagine it’s worth the risk to embrace a mental illness.

Estrogen also causes all kinds of problems – even in women. There was a program in the 1990s to inject post-menopausal women with horse estrogen, which many or most doctors no longer do because it causes strokes.

Last year, the US government issued guidelines saying that the risks outweigh the benefits, and it should be stopped altogether.

That was in 2022 – at the same time they were telling you that “The Science” is a hard and unbreakable doctrine that never changes, both in connection to trannies and the vax.

In fact, when they were telling you that, like every other time in the history of medicine, treatement recommendations were changing nigh-daily.

TRT (testosterone replacement therapy) for older men was considered totally safe a few years ago, and now they are increasingly saying that actually, there are lot of risks (beyond testicular shrinkage and prostate enlargement, which they always knew about).

I was considering taking it when I turned 40, but now – there’s no way. Natural ways of boosting testosterone are easy, and it’s not worth the risk of messing with this stuff.

I could go on and on here. This is a topic I’m very interested in and have followed.

There are so very many risks associated with these hormone treatments, that the reasons to take them at all are increasingly slim. Yes, there are some cases where the risks still outweigh the benefits, but in the case of trannies, this is impossible, given that there is zero risk for a person with gender dysphoria in not taking these drugs.

Anyway – whatever.

All of these trannies are going to die from suicide long before they have a chance to die from these hormones.

Previously:

• “Weight Loss Drug” Causing Stomach Paralysis (Drugs to Change Behavior are an Insane Concept)
• NEW GOOD SOLUTION: Weight Loss Drug to Counter Drug-Induced Weight Gain

How is the mainstream saying that weight loss drugs have health benefits, and also saying “healthy at any size” (i.e., being fat is healthy)?

Can both these things be true?

Obviously not.

Can you think of other examples where the Jewish establishment promotes narratives that are the opposite of each other, and insists that both are absolute fact???

Reuters:

Novo Nordisk said on Tuesday a large late-stage study showed its obesity drug Wegovy had a clear medical benefit, in addition to weight loss, boosting the Danish drugmaker’s hopes of moving beyond Wegovy’s image as a lifestyle drug.

In a statement, the Danish drugmaker said the weekly injection reduced the risk of a major cardiovascular event like a stroke by 20% in overweight or obese people with a history of heart disease, exceeding expectations from a key late-stage trial.

That’s significantly better than the 15-17% expected by investors and analysts ahead of the eagerly-awaited data.

The study called SELECT involved 17,500 patients aged 45 years or older with no prior history of diabetes and started almost five years ago testing if the weekly injection has medical benefits.

The news sent shares in Europe’s second-most valuable listed company after LVMH up more than 13% to record highs. The shares have surged almost 150% over the past two years.

The results may help persuade insurers in the United States and cost-conscious health authorities in Europe to cover the cost of Wegovy for a broader segment of patients.

The U.S. Medicare health plan for older Americans, for example, classifies weight-loss treatments as lifestyle drugs.

Experts say the new data could lead the U.S., where Wegovy costs $1,300 a month, to reassess that.

The landmark trial data shows Wegovy has “the potential to change how obesity is regarded and treated,” said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president for development at Novo Nordisk, in a statement.

Novo Nordisk said it expects to file for regulatory approvals of a label indication expansion for the weekly injection in the United States and European Union this year.

The detailed results from the trial will be presented at a scientific conference later in 2023.

I don’t think these drugs are healthy. (I also think that if anyone can’t control what they shove in their mouth, they are so weak we should let them die.)

That said, even with all of the strange side effects of these drugs, probably, simply losing the weight is going to, on balance, increase their general level of health, because being fat is just so, so, so very bad for you.

Obesity is associated with every single negative health outcome. All of them.

But, also, you know…

I’m Britain’s top fat-fluencer – trolls say I’m a whale but I know I’m healthy https://t.co/XiuRm9UNvX pic.twitter.com/c6Hq2blOxE

— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) August 2, 2023

They aren’t actually talking about “vaccines.”

They are talking about gene therapy.

The coronavirus “vaccine” was actually a gene therapy injection, and they just renamed it a vaccine.

Calling these new forms of gene therapy “vaccines” is weirder, but it follows from that same abuse of language.

The Guardian:

Millions of lives could be saved by a groundbreaking set of new vaccines for a range of conditions including cancer, experts have said. A leading pharmaceutical firm said it is confident that jabs for cancer, cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases, and other conditions will be ready by 2030.

Studies into these vaccinations are also showing “tremendous promise”, with some researchers saying 15 years’ worth of progress has been “unspooled” in 12 to 18 months thanks to the success of the Covid jab.

Dr Paul Burton, the chief medical officer of pharmaceutical company Moderna, said he believes the firm will be able to offer such treatments for “all sorts of disease areas” in as little as five years.

The firm, which created a leading coronavirus vaccine, is developing cancer vaccines that target different tumour types.

Burton said: “We will have that vaccine and it will be highly effective, and it will save many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives. I think we will be able to offer personalised cancer vaccines against multiple different tumour types to people around the world.”

He also said that multiple respiratory infections could be covered by a single injection – allowing vulnerable people to be protected against Covid, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – while mRNA therapies could be available for rare diseases for which there are currently no drugs. Therapies based on mRNA work by teaching cells how to make a protein that triggers the body’s immune response against disease.

Burton said :“I think we will have mRNA-based therapies for rare diseases that were previously undruggable, and I think that 10 years from now, we will be approaching a world where you truly can identify the genetic cause of a disease and, with relative simplicity, go and edit that out and repair it using mRNA-based technology.”

We are on a dark and weird path.

Changing people’s genetics is something that is probably always off-limits ethically, but even if you didn’t think that, these treatments are highly experimental, and they are causing very serious health problems for people exposed to them.

We have seen the mass die-off after the coronavirus “vaccine,” and there is no reason to believe that other gene therapies wouldn’t have the same problems – even if they are better tested.

Wonder why mRNA cancer/heart drugs are going to take 7 years at least to develop? 🤔

The Covid injections took only days to bodge together and were fully tested according to many folks. 🧐

— Maizy Daizy 🌼 (@MaizyDaizyZzzz) April 8, 2023

What it looks like is the ruling elite wants to develop gene therapies for themselves, and releasing these fake vaccines on the masses allows them to use the entire Western population – along with some other populations willing to take the vax – as test subjects for their research.

Back in May, when we were first realizing that people were dying from the vaccine and the media was covering it up, I suggested that Tawny Kitaen, an 80s sex symbol, who died “randomly” at age 59, could have died from the vax.

Although it was never confirmed she took the vax, there were tweets where she was excited about taking it.

Now, her cause of death has been revealed.

Deadline:

Actress Tawny Kitaen died on May 7 from dilated cardiomyopathy. The manner of death was ruled natural today by the Orange County Sheriff’s Dept. in California.

This definitely makes it much more likely that she died from the vaccine than it was when they didn’t say the cause of death, and just said “died mysteriously.”

As we well know now, the vax causes heart disease, which is often fatal. It is also causing people to develop chronic heart problems.

Just to be clear – even in this totally censored landscape, there is actually documentation about people developing cardiomyopathy as a result of the vax. You hear a lot about the myocarditis – but they’re similar conditions, and it’s both. Here’s one study.

Recently, a 4 and 5 year old child were given the covid vax accidentally. They are both now being treated for heart disease.

The media is saying that Tawny also had benzos in her system. Here’s a quick quiz question: how many 59 year old women do not have benzos in their system at any given time? I would guess well over 50% of American women aged 59 take benzos, and these women are not dying randomly from heart disease – or at least they weren’t before this vax was deployed.

I will also say that the fact that they waited nearly six months after her death to release information about the cause of death also indicates that they were trying to cover up a link to the vax. Generally, “so and so died of a heart attack” is the headline. It’s not like a drug overdose, where they have to do tests to figure out what happened – a heart attack is usually obvious. And no death takes six months to figure out.

There appears to be an ongoing policy of covering up “mysterious” and “random” deaths.

To be clear, we have no idea how many people are dying from the vaccine, as the media and government are both outright refusing to keep track of deaths. It was a really wild thing to say “we’re just going to test this drug on the entire population,” but then to do the test and not keep track of the side effects – and actively suppress people who do try to keep track of the side effects – is truly just nuts.

We do know from the VAERS system – which is a self-reporting system that keeps track of only a fraction of side effects – that this coronavirus vaccine is more deadly than all other vaccines ever in history combined. Official reports indicate the vax is killing dozens of people every day in America.

What’s more, we have no idea about the people who are getting the vaccine and then having heart attacks or other events weeks or months after getting the injection. We do know that the vaccine is causing many to develop permanent heart conditions, and that the Moderna vaccine is being restricted and banned all over the world due to the number of people developing heart disease.

Remember: this is all for a disease that is indistinguishable from the flu, according to the official data. My assertion has been that it actually is the flu, and that it has been rebranded as a new disease. Regardless, no one should take the risk associated with this vax to protect themselves from a harmless respiratory infection.

Many right-wingers have said “you can take it if you want but I’m against people being forced to take it.” However, I would go so far as to assert that anyone who decides to take the vax is mentally incompetent. There is no way that someone rationally weighing the risks of the vax vs. the risks of the alleged virus would make the decision to take the vax.

Any person who would make that decision has some kind of psychotic mania.

What’s more: we have evidence that people who take this vax start “shedding” the mutant genetic material in the vax and that this can then infect other people. Remember: the media/government eventually admitted that the vax was causing irregular periods in the women that took the vax, but they never addressed the fact that women who didn’t take the vax, who were simply around women who took it, also got irregular periods. These women were not kissing each other or otherwise sharing fluids – they were women from their workplace. So something was apparently being shed from the skin of the vax and causing body changes in the unvaxed.

Mentally ill people who think this vax is safe do not have a right to pollute the environment with dangerous genetic materials.

The question is: if we have all of these celebrities dying of the vaccine, having heart attacks and so on, then how many random people are having these issues?

Again: we have no idea. But it’s clearly a lot more than we’re being told.

Smoke the weed, goy…!

It will help your suffering from the vax, and make the bugs taste even more delicious…!

You have no choice!

Smoke it…!

CNN:

Whether you smoke it, vape it or eat it as an edible, cannabis may be significantly increasing your risk of a heart attack.

Adults under 45 years old who consumed cannabis within the last 30 days, suffered from nearly double the number of heart attacks than adults who didn’t use the drug, according to research published Tuesday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Cannabis refers to psychoactive preparations of the Cannabis sativa plant, the psychoactive chemical of which is tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, according to the World Health Organization.

Researchers analyzed health data from over 33,000 adults ages 18 to 44 included in US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveys in 2017 and 2018. Of the 17% of adults who reported using cannabis within the previous month, 1.3% later had a heart attack while only 0.8% of non-cannabis users reported the same.

Some people assume that consuming cannabis is safe and can’t harm your body, but that is incorrect, said lead study author Dr. Karim Ladha, clinician-scientist and staff anesthesiologist at St. Michael’s Hospital and the University of Toronto in Canada.

“There’s increasing evidence that this could potentially be harmful to you, both in the short term and the long term,” he said.

…

Cannabis sold on the market today is also much more potent than cannabis sold in the past 50 years, said Robert Page, chair of the American Heart Association scientific statement on cannabis. Page was not involved in the study.

“This isn’t what your granddaddy used to smoke at Woodstock; this is highly potent,” he said.

Many people are not aware that cannabis can have negative interactions with other medications, Page added.

Like most other medications, cannabis is metabolized through the liver, which means it has the potential to interact with many cardiovascular medications like blood thinners, he said.

Interact, smenteract!

Smoke it all!

Just relax!

Smoke that sweet ganja, listen to some Bob Marley, and head on down for your latest vax!

You’ll get a free brownie made from BUGS…!

We’ve known for a long time that heart attacks are being included in the statistics of coronavirus deaths. It’s not clear that they even tell the families that the person who dies is being labeled a coronavirus death.

Daily Mail:

Americans with four conditions – obesity, diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure and heart failure –  account for two-thirds of all COVID-19 hospitalizations in the US, a new study estimates.

The Tufts University researchers note that many instances of these conditions are preventable, and those hospitalizations likely would have been too.

Notably, the study does not distinguish between type 1 and type 2 diabetes among hospitalized COVID+19 patients. While type 2 diabetes typically develops later in and is thought to be predominantly driven by lifestyle factors, type 1 is an autoimmune disease with significant genetic risk factors, and is less likely to be preventable.

The study suggests up that up to two thirds of 906,849 hospitalizations for COVID-19 – or about 600,000 of them – were attributable to the four conditions, and could have been prevented if those patients had not already been in poor health.

…

The researchers urge doctors to not only advise their at-risk patients to get COVID-19 vaccines, but make changes to their diet and exercise habits to protect themselves from coronavirus.

The hospitals are complicit in this, and I know that for a fact from hearing from doctors. They’re just told “put coronavirus as the death cause if there is any chance the patient had it, even if they die from something else.”

Madam Birx herself said this, more than once, all the way back when this started.

Those rules haven’t changed. They are still continuing to count heart attack deaths. We know they are also counting all normal flu deaths.

Related: The CDC: “This is the Lowest Flu Season We’ve had on Record”

This is all just fake. There are no new deaths. They created a crisis out of something that was already happening.

It’s the same with global warming causing hurricanes and forest fires, and with racism causing black people to be poor and criminals. These were things that were already happening that they just all of the sudden said were crises.

There are a lot of problems with modern, urban living that haven’t been solved because our society is driven by financial incentives and there is no financial incentive to solve these problems. Most of the problems have not really even been addressed.

Electromagnetic pollution is real, and it is affecting our nervous system, and possibly even our brains.

Noise pollution is also real.

Apparently, it can actually cause heart damage.

The Atlantic:

In 2011, Germany’s Frankfurt Airport—the country’s busiest—unveiled its fourth runway. This addition sparked major protests, and for years demonstrators returned to the airport every Monday. “It’s destroying my life,” one protester told Reuters in 2012. “Every time I go into my garden, all I can hear and see are planes right above.”

The new runway also channeled dozens of aircraft directly over the house of Thomas Münzel, a cardiologist at the University Medical Center of Mainz. “I have lived close to the German Autobahn and close to inner-city train tracks,” he says. “Aircraft noise is the most annoying by far.” Münzel had read a 2009 World Health Organization report linking noise to heart problems, but evidence at the time was thin. Driven in part by concern for his own health, in 2011 he shifted the focus of his research to learn more.

Exposure to loud noise has long been linked with hearing loss. But the ruckus of planes and cars takes a toll beyond the ears: Traffic noise has been flagged as a major urban environmental stressor, second only to air pollution. In the last decade, a growing body of research more directly links air and road-traffic noise to heightened risks for a number of cardiovascular ailments—and scientists are starting to pinpoint the mechanisms at play.

Evidence of noise’s physiological effects—whether on cells and organs or entire populations—“is really coming together and painting a picture of the problem,” says Mathias Basner, a psychiatrist and epidemiologist at the University of Pennsylvania and president of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise. Yet, he adds, few people are aware of the severity of what his colleagues call a “silent killer.”

Estimates suggest that roughly a third of Americans are regularly exposed to unhealthy levels of noise, typically defined as starting around 70 to 80 decibels. For comparison, normal conversation is about 60 dB, cars and trucks range from 70 to 90 dB, and sirens and airplanes can reach 120 dB or more.

Numerous studies link chronic exposure to environmental noise to an increased risk of heart-related troubles. People living near the Frankfurt airport, for example, have as much as a 7 percent higher risk of stroke than those living in similar but quieter neighborhoods, according to a 2018 study in Noise & Health that investigated the health data of more than 1 million people. An analysis of nearly 25,000 cardiovascular deaths between 2000 and 2015 among people living near Zurich’s airport saw significant increases in nighttime mortality after airplane flyovers, especially among women, a team reported last year in the European Heart Journal.

As researchers probe the physiology underlying noise’s cardiovascular consequences, they’re zeroing in on a culprit: dramatic changes to the endothelium, the inner lining of arteries and blood vessels. This lining can go from a healthy state to one that’s “activated,” and inflamed, with potentially serious ramifications.

When sound reaches the brain, it activates two important regions: the auditory cortex, which interprets noise, and the amygdala, which manages emotional responses to it. As noise gets louder, and especially during sleep, the amygdala activates a stress response—even if the person isn’t aware of it.

Once initiated, this response releases hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol into the body. Some arteries constrict; others dilate. Blood pressure rises, and sugars and fats flood the bloodstream for quick use by the muscles. The cascading stress response also prompts the creation of harmful molecules that cause oxidative stress and inflammation in the lining of blood vessels. This dysfunctional endothelium meddles with blood flow and affects numerous other processes that, when impaired, contribute to a range of cardiovascular illnesses, including high blood pressure, plaque buildup in arteries, obesity, and diabetes.

Studies on people and mice show that the endothelium doesn’t work as efficiently after just a few days of nighttime airplane-noise exposure, suggesting that loud noise isn’t a concern only for people already at risk for heart and metabolic problems. Healthy adults subjected to recordings of trains during their slumber had impaired blood-vessel function almost immediately, according to a 2019 study published by Münzel and his colleagues in Basic Research in Cardiology.

“We were surprised that young people, after hearing these sounds for just one night, had endothelial dysfunction,” says Münzel, coauthor of an overview on noise and cardiovascular health in the 2020 Annual Review of Public Health. “We always thought this was something that takes years to develop.”

“Capitalism” is not really a very descriptive term. Our modern economic order is nothing like what the 18th and 19th century thinkers envisioned when they spoke of capitalism. However, whatever you want to call this system, it is utterly corrupt, and driven entirely by money.

Those who accumulate large amounts of money can then push agendas which might not relate directly making more money, but the only ability to push an agenda comes from money. For example, George Soros is a “philanthropist” who uses his billions to push an agenda to destroy White Western Christian Society. This might not personally profit him, but he is only able to do that because he made billions running hedge funds.Furthermore, it is primarily only Jews who push for changes in Western society that aren’t profitable. Before Milton Friedman, a Jewish economist, non-Jewish rich people did feel a responsibility to society.

There is no money to be made in making society healthy and safe, so society is not healthy and safe.

The most you are going to get with relation to sound pollution is a university backed study. The study is done because everything is studied, to see if it can be of use for making money, or for pushing one of the other agendas of rich people.

This is a thing? Was this always a thing?

A few days ago, I saw some article announcing that breast cancer was no longer the most common type of cancer (at least, in England), and had been overtaken by prostate cancer. In other words, a woman-only type of cancer is now second in importance to a man-only type of cancer.

I didn’t really pay it any mind at the time.

BBC:

Prostate cancer is now the most commonly diagnosed cancer in England, overtaking breast cancer for the first time, latest figures show.

In 2018 there were nearly 50,000 registered cases – around 8,000 more than in 2017.

Public Health England says it is because more men are getting tested.

And that is thanks to celebrities, like Stephen Fry and Bill Turnbull, raising awareness by speaking out about their own experiences.

In 2018, there were 316,680 cancers of any kind diagnosed, the equivalent of 868 cases a day.

Prostate was the most common type – 49,029 cases – followed by breast – 47,476 cases.

Lung and bowel cancers were the next most commonly diagnosed.

As a side note, the notion that prostate cancer is overtaking breast cancer because “more men are getting tested” sounds kind of ridiculous. I mean, even if you don’t get tested, I’m pretty sure you’ll notice at some point when a cancerous tumor is growing on your own prostate.

Ouch.

In any case, what’s making me do a double take here is that the news is now flooded with stories about “Go Red.”

There are hundreds of these articles right now.

I didn’t even know what “Go Red” was, so I had to look it up.

It’s apparently some kind of “awareness campaign” for women’s heart disease.

Go Red:

What is the goal of Go Red For Women?

Go Red For Women encourages awareness of the issue of women and heart disease, and also action to save more lives. The movement harnesses the energy, passion and power women have to band together and collectively wipe out heart disease. It challenges them to know their risk for heart disease and take action to reduce their personal risk. It also gives them the tools they need to lead a heart healthy life.

In 2010, the AHA set a strategic goal of reducing death and disability from cardiovascular disease and strokes by 20 percent while improving the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20 percent by the year 2020.

So I was like… Huh…

“Women’s heart disease” is a thing? A thing distinct from men’s heart disease?

And everyone needs to be reminded of this and wear red just to be politically correct, huh?

Fox 17:

Heart disease is the top health threat for women everywhere, and today everyone is urged to wear red to help spread awareness.

Go Red for Women asks Americans on the first Friday every February to wear wear red and donate to the American Heart Association.

I guess so.

We also need to be wearing one of those pink bracelets to remind ourselves about titty cancer – even though it’s now only the second most common cancer (in England).

For a whole month, too.

Oh, and there’s also HIV awareness to remind us about the fags and their anal engagements.

Wait, they get three separate days?

So basically, everyone needs to be aware of diseases that affect women (and fags).

Never mind that anyone can get cancer – we need a month to raise awareness for the only type of cancer that only women can get.

Never mind that men are more likely to die of heart disease – we all need to dress up in red to raise awareness for the minority of women who might suffer.

Never mind that homos are only getting AIDS because they can’t control their urge to do all sorts of sickening things nonstop or that women are getting breast cancer from birth control pills – they’re victims and we need to devote all of society’s collective medical research fund to prolonging their pitiful, disgusting lives.

When was the last time a major national illness awareness campaign was started about something that straight White males are likely to suffer from?

When are we going to all dress in blue to spread awareness of all the blue collar workers dying of workplace accidents?

When are we going to start wearing neon-green bracelets to spread awareness about men’s heart disease?

When are we going to designate a national awareness month for all those mad lads dying of popcorn lungs from blowing sick clouds or blowing themselves up with defective vaping mods?

We all need to be more aware of this.

The answer, of course, is never. So long as Jews and women are in charge of society, at least.

All this “awareness” bullshit is largely meaningless from a medical standpoint, and is mainly just another opportunity to reinforce the notion that only women and minorities matter and deserve to be pitied, while White men dying isn’t something that is worthy of mention.

I, for one, only care about diseases affecting millennial men like me as well as 2D anime girls.