Elon Musk promised to give away $1 million each day until November’s election to someone who signs his online petition, with the first prize awarded at a PAC event supporting Donald Trump, raising questions about the legality of the payments https://t.co/Woq4LiRuc1 pic.twitter.com/K0agAWLSGa

— Reuters (@Reuters) October 21, 2024

Hey, yeah – turn it into a lottery system.

The Guardian:

Elon Musk said on Saturday that America Pac, the Donald Trump-allied political action committee he founded, will give $1m every day until the presidential election to someone who signs his petition that appears to be a way to incentivize Republicans in battleground states to register to vote.

“We are going to be awarding $1m randomly to people who have signed the petition,” Musk said at a town hall event in Pennsylvania. “One of the challenges we’re having is how do we get the public to know about this petition because the legacy media won’t report on it.”

“I figured, so how do we get people to know about it? I think this news will really fly. So every day between now and the election we will be awarding $1m, starting tonight,” Musk said, before presenting an oversized lottery-style check to the first winner of the prize draw.

The petition asks people to pledge their support for the first and second amendments, but the small print says that to be eligible for any of the monetary awards, signers need to be registered voters in the key battleground states.

In doing so, the petition appears to be designed to principally push Trump voters to register to vote in the presidential election so that they can be in the running for the $1m prize. Signing the petition is also now a prerequisite to attend Musk’s town hall events.

Anglin still banned from Twitter, by the way.

These two Pennsylvania residents received $1 million each from Elon Musk for signing a petition in support of the First and Second Amendments! 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/eef2a8C9ht

— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) October 20, 2024

Biden-Harris Admin Announces Gun Confiscation Funding After Promising Not to Take Guns

Washington, D.C.- The National Association for Gun Rights is denouncing an executive order announced by the Biden-Harris Administration today, which NAGR says funds confiscation of firearms… pic.twitter.com/v6ln8SDunW

— National Association for Gun Rights (@NatlGunRights) September 26, 2024

So, apparently Kamala is now the co-president?

I’ve never heard of the vice president referred to this way, as being a signatory on executive orders.

Even in the Bush 2 administration, when Dick Cheney was widely viewed as the power behind the throne, the media didn’t say “Bush and Cheney unveiled a new plan.”

The Guardian:

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris unveiled a new executive order aimed at tackling gun violence on Thursday, as the vice-president and Donald Trump clash over the issue on the campaign trail.

The order establishes a new “emerging firearms threats task force” to crack down on machine-gun conversion devices and unserialized, 3D-printed guns. The policy also calls on federal agencies to develop guidance for schools on active shooter drills to mitigate potential psychological harm to students.

“To talk about reducing crime and violence in America, you need to talk about guns in America,” Biden said during a press conference in Washington on Thursday. “There’s so much more we have to do. I think it’s time to reinstate the assault weapons ban and high-capacity magazines.”

Biden said: “The lack of guidance today on how to prepare students while minimizing the trauma of active shooter drills is unacceptable.” Referring to the new executive order improving school-based active shooter drills, the president said: “I never thought I would have to sign something like this, but we do.”

Biden called the impact of machine-gun conversion devices – weapons that have the power to transform a handgun into a fully automatic firearm – “devastating”.

A Glock switch is already basically illegal. No one can explain why, but it is.

Further, no one can understand why the niggers, who are the ones big into Glock switches, vote for Democrats. The Republicans are not even trying to cut their entitlements anymore. They might as well become one issue voters, saying they just want Glock switches to they can kill their enemies more effectively.

Harris expressed her support for the second amendment of the constitution, which protects the right of Americans to keep and bear arms, while also backing a ban on assault weapons and passing universal background checks, safe storage laws and red flag laws.

…

Questions over gun access have become an issue in the presidential campaign, with Trump claiming in the presidential debate with Harris this month that Harris “wants to confiscate your guns”. Harris fiercely rejected that charge, noting that she and her running mate, Tim Walz, are both gun owners.

In a conversation with Oprah Winfrey last week, Harris indicated she was not afraid to use a firearm for self-defense, saying: “If someone breaks in my house, they’re getting shot.”

Pretty hardcore, and I think actually illegal in all leftist states.

But she is talking out of both sides of her mouth. That weirdo Walz is out there trying to be a folksy communist who understands the working man’s desire to own many firearms, while she is appealing to women who want to strip all men with penises of their guns in order to create a vagina utopia where sex is the only form of power.

She can say “I’ll kill any immigrant who tries to take what’s mine” while also writing these bills to take people’s guns and then the media will show people whichever side they are likely to sympathize with.

The US government does not have any form of legitimacy. They claim to follow the Constitution, but the Constitution says “shall not be infringed.”

So where do they get this authority? From democracy? What the hell is democracy? Is it an entity? Some kind of evil cosmic entity, like from Lovecraft?

Whatever democracy is, we’ve not heard an explanation as to where its authority comes from.

Vice President Kamala Harris said she believes in the Second Amendment at a campaign event with Oprah Winfrey. “If somebody breaks in my house, they’re getting shot,” Harris said.

Watch the video: https://t.co/YH3XcNtrCW pic.twitter.com/i2YGY8wngL

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) September 20, 2024

Brian, your cheerleading for the ATF’s overreach is misguided at best. Enforcing regulations is one thing, but a 50% increase in revoking licenses under Biden’s administration raises serious questions about the true motives behind this crackdown.

You say it’s about saving lives,…

— Josh White 🇺🇸 (@WhiteJoshuaL) August 19, 2023

But just as long as the ATF is not kicking in your door, everything is fine and you should just drink more estrogen beer and eat more microplastics and support Ron DeSantis.

New York Post:

Gun dealers are crying foul as the Biden administration pursues an apparent crackdown on legal firearms sellers, whose licenses have been revoked at an unprecedented rate over the last two years.

“This policy is designed to be a backdoor violation of the Second Amendment,” Anthony Navarro, a Greeley, Colorado, dealer who lost his license last year, told the Wall Street Journal.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has taken away the licenses of 122 gun dealers since October — up from just 27 revocations in all of fiscal year 2021, a 350% increase in the first nine months of this fiscal year alone.

Dealers complain that many of the violations leading to the loss of their businesses amount to little more than paperwork errors.

Navarro, for example, said he informed the ATF immediately when he found that a lax employee had been mishandling buyers’ purchase documents — and lost his license as a result.

Leslie Gifford of Burkington, Kansas, who legally sold guns as a sideline for more than 30 years, had his license pulled for selling a firearm to a concealed carry holder from Nebraska, who should have been shopping in his own home state.

“Mr. Biden wants to get rid of all of us little dealers,” Gifford said.

In a recently filed lawsuit, North Dakota gun store Bridge City Ordnance alleged that the ATF’s newly strict inspection policy is being “wielded as a political weapon.” “

But the Biden administration’s approach could backfire — as gun dealers threaten to stop informing federal authorities about suspicious buyers in retaliation.

Vivek has an actual pro-Second Amendment platform that is as good as his First Amendment platform, by the way.

I’m just saying.

A nation of sheep breeds a government of wolves. That’s really what the Second Amendment is all about.

— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) August 13, 2023

It’s high time to consider protesting that our Jewish government be replaced with a Hindu government.

At least Hindus don’t hate Jesus and want to make a lot of money.

Oh.

Another way to take guns from the people?

Reuters is yet again doing mass editorialization on the politicized issue of gun restrictions:

The U.S. Supreme Court, which last year expanded gun rights in a landmark ruling, is set to return to the issue in a major case testing whether a law that keeps firearms away from people under domestic-violence restraining orders violates the Constitution.

It is one of the biggest cases that the court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has agreed to hear during its next term, which begins in October. The justices wrapped up their latest nine-month term last week with important rulings rejecting affirmative action in collegiate admissions, undermining LGBT rights and invalidating President Joe Biden’s student debt relief after a year earlier overturning abortion rights.

The case involves a Texas man named Zackey Rahimi who was convicted under a 1994 federal law that prohibits a person subject to a domestic violence restraining order – as he was after assaulting his girlfriend – from possessing a firearm.

Is it an Arab???

Elvis Dunderhoff didn’t bother looking that up (I’m sure. he’s a very busy man, what with researching whether or not “if” is a conjunction or a verb), but yes – it appears to be some kind of Arab.

I guess it’s an Arab, or a Caucasian, or something.

Rahimi challenged his conviction on the grounds that the law violated the Constitution’s Second Amendment “right to keep and bear arms,” and won. Biden’s administration has appealed.

A ruling is expected by June 2024, with the U.S. presidential race kicking into high gear.

“The Supreme Court must reverse this dangerous ruling,” Janet Carter of the gun-violence prevention group Everytown Law said. “Domestic abusers do not have – and should not have – the constitutional right to possess a firearm.”

They have yet to even define “domestic abuse.” Regardless, there is already a system to keep felons from owning guns (which I do not agree with, by the way), so if we are talking about “misdemeanor domestic abuse,” it seems Democrats are, yet again, just doing anything they can to reduce gun rights generally.

(This article from Vox admits that the forms of “domestic abuse” in question are not felony offenses, so this would presumably be the first instance of a non-felony crime leading to having your Second Amendment rights taken – because “my vagina, goyim.”)

The court’s conservative majority has taken an expansive view of Second Amendment rights in a nation facing persistent gun violence including mass shootings. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The court has widened gun rights in three major rulings since 2008.

The court in a June 2022 ruling called New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen invalidated New York state’s limits on carrying concealed handguns outside the home. In doing so, it created a new test for assessing firearms laws, saying restrictions must be “consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation,” not simply advance an important government interest. Rahimi prevailed under that test.

Rahimi received a six-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to illegally possessing a firearm while subject to a court-approved domestic violence restraining order his girlfriend obtained after he assaulted and threatened to shoot her. He later was arrested for violating it. He was involved in five shooting incidents spanning two months and was caught with a pistol and rifle during a police search of his home, legal filings showed.

If he wouldn’t have been such a pussy, and instead followed through on the threat, we would not even be having this conversation!

FAG!

Rahimi challenged his conviction, arguing that barring gun possession by people under restraining orders is unconstitutional under the Bruen case standard. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, with a unanimous panel of three Republican-appointed judges calling the ban “an outlier that our ancestors would never have accepted.”

Judge James Ho, appointed by former President Donald Trump, in a concurring opinion said a restraining order can be obtained relatively easily, adding that “there’s a tremendous risk that courts will enter protective orders automatically – despite the absence of any real threat of danger.”

It seems unlikely that the SCOTUS will side with the vaginalists in this particular case.

It is notably, however, that this case is getting a lot of attention, and the media is framing it as “women’s rights v. gun rights.” That is obviously retarded, but this “conservative” court has previously responded very aggressively to media pressure.

Why is the Supreme Court making all these unusual decisions?

— MG (@arnau1700) June 30, 2023

Colorado-based Biofire Tech is taking orders for a smart gun enabled by facial-recognition technology, the latest development in personalized weapons that can only be fired by verified users https://t.co/6TISTmuFEg pic.twitter.com/tkJS0QnWeO

— Reuters (@Reuters) April 21, 2023

The second you put down the Smart Gun, it instantly relocks. Live from the Safety and Testing Facility at #Biofire HQ, we dive into the #safety features of the #BiofireSmartGun.

Learn more at https://t.co/t9vuFNWYVw#9mm #todayIlearned #technology pic.twitter.com/paikPIIav7

— Biofire (@BiofireUSA) April 21, 2023

This is a plan to make it so you can’t use your gun if you say nigger on the internet or lose Fishtank.

Reuters:

Colorado-based Biofire Tech is taking orders for a smart gun enabled by facial-recognition technology, the latest development in personalized weapons that can only be fired by verified users.

But in a sign of the long, challenging road that smart guns have faced, a prototype twice failed to fire when demonstrated for Reuters this week. Company founder and Chief Executive Kai Kloepfer said the software and electronics have been fully tested, and the failure was related to the mechanical gun which was made from pre-production and prototype parts.

At other times during the demonstration the weapon fired successfully and the facial-recognition technology appeared to function.

Biofire’s smart gun

Biofire’s gun can also be enabled by a fingerprint reader, one of several smart gun features designed to avoid accidental shootings by children, reduce suicides, protect police from gun grabs, or render lost and stolen guns useless.

The first consumer-ready versions of the 9mm handgun could be shipped to customers who pre-ordered as soon as the fourth quarter of this year, with the standard $1,499 model possibly available by the second quarter of 2024, Biofire said.

This is total bullshit.

We need plastic guns, that can’t be traced, that can be made by anyone.

We don’t need people controlling our guns.

Insofar as “this is not who we are” is a statement with a meaning, this is that situation.

Kai Kloepfer, CEO and founder of Biofire Technologies

YESTERDAY: The Pentagon says it will implement new recommendations to prevent suicide within the military. pic.twitter.com/dTkdki5j9A

— The Hill (@thehill) February 25, 2023

This is the funniest argument for gun control so far.

RT:

A Pentagon advisory panel formed to help address a suicide crisis in the US military has recommend imposing gun control measures on American service members to make it harder for them to kill themselves.

Soldiers under age 25 would be banned from buying guns on US bases, while all others would face a seven-day waiting period to complete their firearm purchases under a plan released on Friday by the Pentagon’s suicide prevention committee. The group also called for creating a database to track guns purchased on US military property, which would require repealing legislation passed by Congress in 2013 to prohibit such tactics, as well as a waiting period on ammunition sales.

“When we look at the science of suicide prevention, there’s arguably only one thing that all researchers agree on,” said panel member Craig Bryan, a safety expert at Ohio State University. “And that one thing is that taking steps to slow down convenient access to highly lethal methods like firearms is the single-most effective strategy for saving lives.”

Such measures would put the US military in the position of inhibiting the constitutional gun rights of its own service members, who exist ostensibly to defend American freedoms. It will be up to the Pentagon and Congress to determine whether to implement any or all of the panel’s recommendations.

I wonder why so many US soldiers kill themselves?

Texas has gone full faggot.

If Greg Abbott is too much of a bitch cripple to stop immigration from Mexico, he at least could have stopped immigration form California.

New York Post:

A brewery in Texas has canceled a rally featuring Kyle Rittenhouse, claiming that the event doesn’t reflect its values.

Southern Star Brewing Company, a brewery in Conroe, Texas, will no longer host the “Rally Against Censorship” featuring Rittenhouse on Jan. 26, explaining its position Friday in a Twitter post.

“Southern star brewery is an apolitical organization. But we feel that this event doesn’t reflect our own values and we could not in good faith continue to rent our space for the event on 1/26. We don’t do rallies, we make beer for people who like beer,” the brewery said.

Nothing says apolitical like picking a side.

— James Dunn 🇺🇸🦅 (@dunnrightpodcst) January 13, 2023

Rittenhouse reacted to the event’s cancelation by Southern Star Brewing Co.

“It’s really disappointing to see that places continue to censor me and not allow my voice and many other voices to be heard because they bend to the woke crowd. I’ll keep you guys updated on the event on the 26th that I was supposed to speak at,” Rittenhouse said.

“I don’t support companies who don’t support the first amendment,” Rittenhouse added in another tweet.

Seriously, what is Greg Abbott’s game? His dick does not work.

Most of these people in the government are pedophiles. What does Greg Abbott do? Lick the children?

It’s really disappointing to see that places continue to censor me and not allow my voice and many other voices to be heard because they bend to the woke crowd. I’ll keep you guys updated on the event on the 26th that I was supposed to speak at. https://t.co/bKOyvZQyb2

— Kyle Rittenhouse (@ThisIsKyleR) January 13, 2023

I don’t support companies who don’t support the first amendment.

— Kyle Rittenhouse (@ThisIsKyleR) January 13, 2023

That was so funny when Kyle killed those Jews.

The last great lol.

Can you think of a more blatant display of pure evil than this?

Daily Mail:

A woman who stabbed a three-year-old boy in the face and then tried to slash at his sibling’s face in front of his horrified parents has been arrested in Georgia.

The 51-year-old was filmed on Pekini Street in Tbilisi walking past the parents with their two little children on Tuesday evening.

Footage shows her approaching the three-year-old boy, who is holding his mother’s hand, and slashing the child across the face.

Afterwards she begins marching off before turning on her heels and going after their second child, who is swiftly shielded by the father.

The father runs at the crazed woman but backs away when she flashes the blade in his direction.

An ambulance rushed the stricken boy to hospital where he was treated for cuts to his nose and cheek, which were deemed to be ‘moderately severe,’ Jam News reported.

The knife-woman was able to flee the scene but was detained by police this morning.

By “flee the scene” they mean she just walked away, unchallenged, because she had a knife. You can see that in the video.

There are two questions to ask here.

Would this kind of thing happen if everyone were carrying guns?

Evil, insane criminals, or just bored people, would think twice about randomly attacking people if there was a high chance they’d encounter resistance. This woman knew that she could get away with it, which is why she just flashed the blade and walked away without a single worry.

America has to defend its Second Amendment and encourage people to carry guns. Other white countries have to adopt the approach to guns of America’s Founding Fathers.

Would a mother with a healthy family do this kind of thing?

Women go mad if they don’t have kids before losing their fertility. Stabbing a random child is a clear act of hatred. The desperation they feel when they realize they’re running out of time drives them to do crazy stuff. After they run out of time and they’re left childless, alone and forgotten, hate fills their hearts because of course, her situation is everyone else’s fault.

Pregnancy brings them joy.

They exist to make babies. They have a womb because they’re meant to use it. These are not optional organs put into their bodies just in case they decide to use them. They have to use them. It is the reason they are women and not men.

Women who hate and attack children reject their explicit purpose in life and choose to destroy the purpose of others.

Does “rejecting one’s explicit purpose and choosing to destroy the purpose of others” sound familiar?

This was one of the options I’d considered when looking at this situation.

But it also looked suspiciously like this guy was planning to do a mass shooting and then changed his mind.

However, the fact that he didn’t do a mass shooting means that he broke no law, unless they can somehow prove he was planning to do one, which I doubt they’ll be able to do, unless they fake it.

New York Post:

The Missouri man who walked into a Walmart wearing body armor and wielding a loaded “tactical rifle” — just days after the El Paso and Dayton shootings — told cops he was testing his constitutional right to bear arms.

“I wanted to know if that Walmart honored the Second Amendment,” said Dmitriy Andreychenko, according to local authorities.

“He stated his intentions were to buy grocery bags and did not intend for anybody to act negatively towards him,” an officer explained in a probable cause statement. “The rifle had a loaded magazine inserted but a round was not chambered. He also had a handgun on his right hip which was loaded with one round in the chamber.”

Andreychenko, 20, allegedly told cops that he “did not believe people would react the way they did” when he strolled into the Springfield Walmart on Thursday with his weapons.

“He said, ‘This is Missouri, I understand if we were somewhere else like New York or California, people would freak out,’” recalled the interviewing officer. “He said he brought a rifle and body armor due to three recent shootings and a stabbing and he wanted to protect himself. He stated he walked into the store, heard the fire alarm go off and walked out of the store. An individual then pointed a gun at him and told him to put his hands up.”

Cops said Andreychenko was detained by an armed off-duty firefighter and later placed under arrest.

He allegedly mentioned the shootings at the Walmart in El Paso and bar district in Dayton, Ohio that occurred last weekend — and noted how he told his wife, Angelice, that he was going to put his Second Amendment rights to the test in the wake of what happened.

“He said he wanted to see if the Walmart manager would respect his Second Amendment right. She told him it was not a smart idea,” the probable cause statement says. “She told him that people were going to take this seriously due to the recent events (referring to the recent mass shootings in the country). He told her he called multiple Walmarts to see if it was. She said he was just an immature boy.”

Andreychenko allegedly went to his sister, Anastasia, at one point and asked if she would videotape him going inside the store.

“He called it a social experiment,” according to the probable cause statement. “She told him it was a bad idea and that she did not want to do that.”

Andreychenko went on with his plan anyway and is now looking at a felony charge of making a terrorist threat in the second degree. He faces up to four years in prison and a $10,000 fine, if convicted.

Russians in Missouri should be expected to do things like this, I would think.

I mean, if you understand Russians, and you understand Missouri, you don’t have to be a genius to figure out that this sort of thing is bound to happen.

This is similar to the obvious fact that if you move a bunch of Pakistanis to liberated feminist Britain, they are going to start grooming young teen and preteen white girls to be prostitutes and sex slaves. If you move a Russian to Missouri, he’s going to show up in Walmart with a semi-automatic rifle to prove he has gun rights.

#BREAKING: Photo obtained by @kolr10kozl of the man arrested at a Walmart in Springfield, Missouri today. Police say man had armor & rifle when an armed off-duty firefighter detained him until police arrived. https://t.co/rQqDTM1Mtt pic.twitter.com/yzA9kUlulX

— Mitchell McCoy (@MitchellMcCoy) August 9, 2019

If there was a sign posted on the door of the Walmart saying guns are not allowed in the store, then he did break the law. But that is the only law he could have broken.

He should probably just be let go and we should forget about this.

Though I doubt that is the way it is going to go.

Aw jeez man jeez, am I gonna be forced to side with the weed people now?

Alas, it seems that I am.

KMBC:

A firearms expert said Missourians who get a medical marijuana card will not be able to buy a gun.

“If you are able to get it, get a doctor’s prescription, you will no longer be able to purchase firearms, not legally, not through a gun shop,” firearms instructor Don Pind said.

The federal form required with each gun purchase specifically says that using or possessing marijuana is illegal under federal law, regardless if it is OK for medicinal or recreational use in any state.

Pind said he has seen it happen to Missourians who bought pot in Colorado, where it is legal.

“They came back to Missouri, went to purchase a gun. You have to have a photo ID. When we run your name through the computer, it automatically connects you with buying marijuana in Colorado,” Pind said.

That’s because dispensaries also check identification for marijuana purchases.

This was discussed as soon as marijuana became legal. But I had no idea they were using a federal database that connected marijuana purchase to gun purchase – this is a vicious, complete violation of basic freedoms.

And a lot of conservatives would no doubt support this – I’m sure that’s who’s pushing it. It relies on a federal law that says you can’t be addicted to an addictive substance and own a gun.

According to an open letter released in 2011 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, known as the ATF, federal law prohibits anyone who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” from shipping, transporting, receiving or possessing firearms or ammunition.

Well – these people legalized marijuana. So it is no longer an illegal addictive substance. People using other legal narcotics are not banned from owning guns. If you buy Oxycontin or Adderall, your name doesn’t go into a database that is linked into the database at gun shops.

And what about alcoholics? What about cigarette smokers? Through legalism, these same restrictions could apply.

Note that it says “unlawful user OR addicted” – there are all kinds of people lawfully addicted to all kinds of controlled substances.

Basically, the law banning people from being addicted to things and owning guns needs to be repealed, because it doesn’t make any sense and it is clearly unconstitutional. Any restriction they put on gun ownership is a move to push for more restrictions on gun ownership, and honestly, the database itself is unconstitutional. The ban on felons owning guns – which is obviously a roundabout way to keep blacks from buying guns – is also Unconstitutional.

There is nothing in the Second Amendment that puts any restrictions at all on firearm ownership, and any infringement on that is a danger to all of us.

“Shall not be infringed” means “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

Period.

That is the law.

The Constitution didn’t stutter.

Of course the Founding Fathers never envisioned all these people being addicted to drugs, or that black people would ever be given the rights of citizens – but those are the problems that need dealt with. We cannot simply abandon the basics of the Constitution because we’ve created new horrible problems like drug addicts and legalized blacks.

They are now trying to push through “mental health” restrictions on guns – this is the most obvious trap yet. They will be able to apply that to everything. The very same Jews who push for these gun restrictions claim that hating them is a mental illness. So where do you think they’re going with that?

If a person – whether they be a felon or a mentally ill person – is not considered a safe person to own a gun, then they should not be considered a safe person to do anything else, and they should be in prison, in some kind of Concentration camp, or simply executed/euthanized.

We don’t give our freedoms over because of some weird minority group.