These things always have to have some retarded political response.

Whatever happened to “hope and prayers”?

UPI:

Montenegro authorities are considering a total ban on gun ownership in the aftermath of a cafe shooting that left at least 12 dead, including two children, in the city of Cetinje Wednesday.

Prime Minister Milojko Spajić said the government “will urgently look at all options, including a complete ban on gun ownership at its upcoming National Security Council meeting.

“Weapons can’t be in the streets and in the hands of those who could hurt others. I will ask our security heads to offer concrete solutions for the safety of our citizens as early as tomorrow,” Spajić said.

According to police, the killer was 45-year-old Aco Martinović. The public prosecutor said Martinović committed suicide when police surrounded him after an hours-long manhunt.

Aco Martinović

Martinović had been drinking heavily all day when he got into an altercation at a restaurant when he went home and got a gun, returning to kill several people, according to Montenegro authorities.

The restaurant owner and his children, 10 and 13, were among the dead.

He then went to several other locations, shooting members of his family and other people.

As far as I could find, Montenegro has only ever had 2 mass shootings in its history, both of them in the last 3 years, and both of them in this town of fewer than 15,000 people.

Why not just ban the town, instead of taking everyone’s guns away?

Video from the previous mass shooting from 2022

]]> https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/12/10/judge-to-decide-if-the-onion-can-buy-infowars-following-shady-auction-supported-by-sandy-hoaxsters/ Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Concerned Federal Judge Extends Hearing Investigating Bizarre Auction of Infowars to The Onion for Another Day Alex Jones Breaks Down the Latest

WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/M3qWr0D4Iz pic.twitter.com/kOqGAZXbGz

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 10, 2024

AJ’s explanation above probably makes sense technically, though his speech does not tend to make sense in practice. He’s become very difficult to follow.

I’m not even blaming him for that. Although I was previously pretty critical of his shilling for Jews, I’ve been on his side since the hammer came down on him. I support anyone who is targeted by the Jews and the Jewnited Snakes “government” criminal gang. Whatever disagreements I might have with an individual are set aside once the hammer comes down. That’s a hard line for me (unless the person is a fed or works with feds, in which case I hope they choke).

So I’m not attacking Jones for not making sense when he talks. He has substance abuse problems, as do most people targeted by Jews, and he is under extreme stress and probably doesn’t sleep very much. You wouldn’t expect him to make sense when he talks.

But the basic story, that Infowars was sold without a real auction, is accurate.

AP:

A bid by The Onion satirical news outlet to buy Alex Jones’ conspiracy theory platform Infowars returned Monday to a Texas courtroom, where a judge heard arguments on whether a bankruptcy auction was properly run as Jones alleges collusion and fraud.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez in Houston is looking into the November auction and how a trustee chose The Onion over the only other bidder — a company affiliated with Jones that offered twice as much money as The Onion. The judge said the hearing would last into Monday evening and pick up again on Tuesday afternoon.

“Affiliated with Jones” simply means it’s the one he wants to buy it. It doesn’t mean he owns the company. That language is convoluted on purpose, so it sounds like he’s trying to buy back his own site.

But the AP admits the bid was twice what The Onion offered.

The sale of Infowars is part of Jones’ personal bankruptcy case, which he filed in late 2022 after he was ordered to pay nearly $1.5 billion in defamation lawsuits in Connecticut and Texas filed by relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut. Jones repeatedly called the 2012 shooting that killed 20 children and six educators a hoax staged by actors and aimed at increasing gun control.

The court never determined whether or not these people are crisis actors, because the court decided to issue default judgments to Jones, prohibiting any kind of trial.

American-Jew courts can just do whatever they want to anyone. Trust me.

Most of the proceeds from the sale of Infowars, as well as many of Jones’ personal assets, will go to the Sandy Hook families to help satisfy judgments issued by juries and judges in state courts in Connecticut and Texas. Some proceeds will go to Jones’ other creditors.

The Onion, which wants to turn Infowars’ website and social media accounts into parodies, offered $1.75 million for Infowars’ assets in the auction, while First United American Companies — which runs a website in Jones’ name that sells nutritional supplements — bid $3.5 million.

The Onion’s bid also included a pledge by many of the Sandy Hook families to forgo some or all of the auction proceeds due to them to give other creditors a total of $100,000 more than they would receive under other bids.

The trustee, Christopher Murray, chose The Onion, saying its proposal was better for creditors because they would receive more money.

…

Jones’ lawyer, Ben Broocks, questioned Murray’s rationale for choosing The Onion and alleged that a recent deposition of the trustee showed improprieties. He also questioned the validity of The Onion’s bid, saying it was technically valued at $7 million because of the incentive offered by the Sandy Hook families.

It was just a big scam.

The goal of the court was never to follow the law, but to do whatever possible to hurt Alex Jones. He might not talk about the Jews, and in fact he covers up their crimes, but he talks about a lot of other things that Jews do not want to be in the public consciousness.

He was very popular and still is, and they want to shut down his ability to engage in speech. There is no legal framework for “ban this individual from speaking,” so they do all of these legal gymnastics to do that.

Biden-Harris Admin Announces Gun Confiscation Funding After Promising Not to Take Guns

Washington, D.C.- The National Association for Gun Rights is denouncing an executive order announced by the Biden-Harris Administration today, which NAGR says funds confiscation of firearms… pic.twitter.com/v6ln8SDunW

— National Association for Gun Rights (@NatlGunRights) September 26, 2024

So, apparently Kamala is now the co-president?

I’ve never heard of the vice president referred to this way, as being a signatory on executive orders.

Even in the Bush 2 administration, when Dick Cheney was widely viewed as the power behind the throne, the media didn’t say “Bush and Cheney unveiled a new plan.”

The Guardian:

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris unveiled a new executive order aimed at tackling gun violence on Thursday, as the vice-president and Donald Trump clash over the issue on the campaign trail.

The order establishes a new “emerging firearms threats task force” to crack down on machine-gun conversion devices and unserialized, 3D-printed guns. The policy also calls on federal agencies to develop guidance for schools on active shooter drills to mitigate potential psychological harm to students.

“To talk about reducing crime and violence in America, you need to talk about guns in America,” Biden said during a press conference in Washington on Thursday. “There’s so much more we have to do. I think it’s time to reinstate the assault weapons ban and high-capacity magazines.”

Biden said: “The lack of guidance today on how to prepare students while minimizing the trauma of active shooter drills is unacceptable.” Referring to the new executive order improving school-based active shooter drills, the president said: “I never thought I would have to sign something like this, but we do.”

Biden called the impact of machine-gun conversion devices – weapons that have the power to transform a handgun into a fully automatic firearm – “devastating”.

A Glock switch is already basically illegal. No one can explain why, but it is.

Further, no one can understand why the niggers, who are the ones big into Glock switches, vote for Democrats. The Republicans are not even trying to cut their entitlements anymore. They might as well become one issue voters, saying they just want Glock switches to they can kill their enemies more effectively.

Harris expressed her support for the second amendment of the constitution, which protects the right of Americans to keep and bear arms, while also backing a ban on assault weapons and passing universal background checks, safe storage laws and red flag laws.

…

Questions over gun access have become an issue in the presidential campaign, with Trump claiming in the presidential debate with Harris this month that Harris “wants to confiscate your guns”. Harris fiercely rejected that charge, noting that she and her running mate, Tim Walz, are both gun owners.

In a conversation with Oprah Winfrey last week, Harris indicated she was not afraid to use a firearm for self-defense, saying: “If someone breaks in my house, they’re getting shot.”

Pretty hardcore, and I think actually illegal in all leftist states.

But she is talking out of both sides of her mouth. That weirdo Walz is out there trying to be a folksy communist who understands the working man’s desire to own many firearms, while she is appealing to women who want to strip all men with penises of their guns in order to create a vagina utopia where sex is the only form of power.

She can say “I’ll kill any immigrant who tries to take what’s mine” while also writing these bills to take people’s guns and then the media will show people whichever side they are likely to sympathize with.

The US government does not have any form of legitimacy. They claim to follow the Constitution, but the Constitution says “shall not be infringed.”

So where do they get this authority? From democracy? What the hell is democracy? Is it an entity? Some kind of evil cosmic entity, like from Lovecraft?

Whatever democracy is, we’ve not heard an explanation as to where its authority comes from.

Vice President Kamala Harris said she believes in the Second Amendment at a campaign event with Oprah Winfrey. “If somebody breaks in my house, they’re getting shot,” Harris said.

Watch the video: https://t.co/YH3XcNtrCW pic.twitter.com/i2YGY8wngL

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) September 20, 2024

BREAKING UPDATE

4 dead, 30 injured after shooting at Apalachee High School in Barrow County, Georgia.

The shooting suspect is in police custody.

This is a developing story. pic.twitter.com/sT7OMQOE34

— Conservative Brief (@ConservBrief) September 4, 2024

RIP to the 4 victims who tragically lost their lives today in the Apalachee High School shooting. As pictured:

1. Richard Aspinwall (math teacher)
2. Mason Schermerhorn (14y/o student)
3. Christian Angulo (14y/o student)
4. Christina Irimie (math teacher) pic.twitter.com/Gfg7x4UWTL

— Everything Georgia (@GAFollowers) September 5, 2024

What happened? Was it a tranny?

Reuters:

A 14-year-old boy killed two fellow students and two teachers and wounded nine others in a shooting at a Georgia high school on Wednesday, jolting the United States with the first mass campus shooting since the start of the school year.

The suspect, who had been interviewed by law enforcement last year over online threats about committing a school shooting, was taken into custody shortly after the shooting at Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia, investigators said.

He was identified as Colt Gray, 14, and will be charged and tried as an adult, Chris Hosey, director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, told a press conference.

…

Officials identified those killed as two 14-year-old students, Mason Schermerhorn and Christian Angulo, and two teachers, Richard Aspenwall, 39, and Christina Irimie, 53. All nine of those hospitalized were expected to recover, Smith told reporters.

…

The shooting revived both the national debate about gun control and the outpouring of grief that follows in a country where such outbursts occur with some regularity.

Oh.

Gun control again.

I assume it was a tranny.

Maybe it was fake like Sandy Hook.

Another School shooting, this time at Apalachee High school in Winder Georgia.

Yes, it’s a gun problem
Yes, it’s a regulation problem
Yes, it’s a mental health proven.
Yes, it’s a societal problem
Yes I’ll politicize it!

Stop fighting and work together to save our children. pic.twitter.com/tzamFFtEXH

— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) September 4, 2024

Your ‘thoughts and prayers’ aren’t working.

Praying only works if you govern based off the ‘will of the people’ and NOT the NRA and IMAGINARY POWERS of the 2nd Amendment.

Winder, Georgia – “Thoughts and prayers”.
Lewiston, Maine – “Thoughts and prayers”.
Louisville… pic.twitter.com/RvSsrT2mTO

— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) September 4, 2024

A wise man once observed that America is a fag nation. Among other things, this was proven out by the fact that, like a bunch of fags, America banned machine guns. Only a fag nation would ban machine guns.

The Post Millennial:

A federal judge on Friday ruled that a ban on possessing a machine gun is unconstitutional as he dismissed charges against Tamori Morgan, who had been charged with two counts of illegally owning a machine gun, the Daily Caller reported.

Trump-appointed Judge John Broomes, of the US District Court for the District of Kansas, wrote, “The court finds that the Second Amendment applies to the weapons charged because they are ‘bearable arms’ within the original meaning of the amendment. The court further finds that the government has failed to establish that this nation’s history of gun regulation justifies the application of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o) to Defendant. The court therefore grants the motion to dismiss.” Prosecutors had charged Morgan with violations of 18 United States Code § 922(o) – which says, “it shall be unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machine gun.”

Judge John Broomes

Prosecutors charged Morgan because he had an Anderson Manufacturing, model AM-15 .300 caliber machine gun in his possession as well as a “Glock switch,” a device that converts the Glock to an automatic weapon, court documents state.

Based.

The Anderson is just a normal AR platform. (The .300 is a bit more hardcore than the normal 5.56×45mm NATO.)

The Glock Switch is something separate. It’s a little piece of metal that will turn a Glock handgun into a fully automatic.

The court is legalizing both machine rifles and pistols at the same time.

At least, that is the implication, if this is not appealed and overruled.

Broomes said the impetus was on the government to prove there was a historical basis for banning machine guns. 

…

Congress has tried to control the ownership of machine guns with the National Firearms Act of 1934 and with the outright ban in 1986. Prosecutors in the Morgan case had insisted that his machine gun was not covered by Second Amendment rights.

Broomes upended that assumption by saying machine guns are protected “within the original meaning of the amendment.” The Department of Justice (DOJ) can choose to appeal the ruling. “Plaintiff is charged with two counts of machinegun possession, and both counts apply to arms that can be carried in the hand. Thus, by definition, the machinegun and Glock switch are bearable arms within the plain text of the Second Amendment,” Broomes wrote.

Assuming everything goes through, this is the biggest win for gun rights in most of our lifetimes.

As Andrew Anglin oft notes, if the people are not allowed to own and carry concealed machine pistols, the First Amendment is null and void, given that these are clearly “bearable arms.”

This will open a new industry on manufacturing automatic weapons and well as allowing the Glock Switch and other mods to be widely sold and implemented.

The ATF has been obsessed with Glock Switches since the 1980s. Now, assuming all goes well, you’re just going to be able to order them online.

Very big news.

NOW: NYPD Gun Detectors UNVEILED at Fulton Street Subway Station in NYC

Video by Peter H Desk@freedomnews.tv to license pic.twitter.com/CM5fnZKn3I

— Oliya Scootercaster 🛴 (@ScooterCasterNY) July 26, 2024

It would be better if everyone was legally allowed to bring their guns on the subway, no?

I mean, whites are a lot better aim than blacks.

It’s already a ridiculous mess, at this point, just openly allowing shootouts on the subway would make everyone feel a lot safer.

You would probably have people coming up from Texas to ride around on the subway all day just waiting for some black or Venezuelan to draw his gun.

New York Post:

Mayor Eric Adams’ controversial plan to install gun-detecting tech in the Big Apple’s beleaguered transit system was booted up Friday in lower Manhattan.

The weapons scanner pilot program from company Evolv, which was unveiled by the tech-loving mayor in March, went live in the Fulton Street station at around 4 p.m., ahead of the evening commute.

A Post reporter observed passengers forking over their handbags and backpacks to police for inspection before they passed through the electronic detector, where there was a sea of additional officers waiting on the other side. Once cleared, they walked back and retrieved their items.

One police officer wearing rubber gloves was seen thoroughly searching one straphanger’s black backpack, carefully going through each pocket.

Commuters who spoke to The Post welcomed the scanners — as long as they are accurate and don’t hold up the hurried commuters.

When the program is implemented only random people — every five people or so — will be selected to go through the detector, Adams told reporters at a press conference Friday evening.

He described the new weapons technology surveillance pilot, which uses electromagnetic technology, as “groundbreaking” — noting scanners will be placed at “select” stations throughout the city “over the next month.”

This hardly seems like a long-term solution to the problem of escalating violence.

It seems to me that this is a social problem, and not a problem of access to guns.

No?

“We are seized by the seriousness and importance of this.”

Security Minister Dan Jarvis tells #R4Today that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is looking at tighter restrictions on crossbows after three women were killed in Bushey in Hertfordshire.

— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) July 11, 2024

Remember when they ran that slogan “instead of teaching women not to get raped, how about teach men not to rape”?

Well I’ve got a slogan for you: “instead of teaching men not to shoot crossbows at women, how about teach women to dodge?”

It’s not a gun, bitch.

If you weren’t so fat and lazy, you could just dodge.

The Guardian:

Ministers will move “at pace” to review the law on crossbow ownership, the security minister has said, after three women were killed in a suspected crossbow attack in Hertfordshire.

Dan Jarvis said it was “entirely reasonable” to question whether existing laws on the weapons were fit for purpose and that ministers would act decisively if they needed to be changed.

He said Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, was “very carefully” examining a call for evidence that was launched by the Home Office earlier this year.

“These are clearly very serious and pressing matters,” Jarvis told BBC Breakfast.

Crossbows are literally the opposite of a serious and pressing matter, Jarvis.

You know what are serious and pressing matters? The total replacement of the white population of Europe with Africans and suits that help you drink piss. Those are serious and pressing matters.

Women getting shot with a crossbow is like, just some weird event literally no one cares about.

Asked about the suitability of the existing legislation, which allows people aged 18 and above to buy and own a crossbow without needing to register it or get a licence, he said: “I think that is an entirely reasonable challenge.”

He continued: “​We’ll want to look very carefully at the legislation that’s in place at the moment and we’ll need to come to a conclusion sooner rather than later as to whether the current legislation is appropriate or not.

“If we decide that it isn’t – and I think you raise a really important point about the ability of people to buy these particular weapons – then we’ll need to make changes to the legislation. But we need to do this properly, there needs to be due process.”

This is what happens in the West. We are surrounded by very real, very serious problems. They are everywhere. But instead of addressing these problems, politicians go around talking about things that don’t matter or do not even exist.

Global warming literally doesn’t exist. It’s a hoax. But it’s the number one thing we talk about.

Meanwhile, you have infinity niggers killing everyone, and we’re talking about three fat bitches who can’t dodge a crossbow bolt because they do nothing but scarf down crisps.

“How can you guarantee that public safety won’t be put at risk?”@Marthakearney asks Security Minister Dan Jarvis, as the government is expected to announce the early release of some prisoners to free up space.#R4Today

— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) July 11, 2024

See: The US Government is a Criminal Gang with No Legitimate Authority to Rule the American People

Shall not be infringed. Unless…. [list of hundreds of different ways it’s infringed]

Imagine that there are adult human beings living on the planet earth who think the the US Constitution has some bearing on the way the US government is run. Not just people with clinical mental illness, or street junkies, but normal adults with normal jobs who live in normal houses.

It’s beyond comprehension.

The Guardian:

The US supreme court has upheld a federal ban preventing anyone placed under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun.

The ruling in US v Rahimi, supported by eight justices to one, with Clarence Thomas dissenting, will leave in place legal protections against a major source of gun violence in America.

My nigga Thomas is the single person on the court who even pretends to care about this country.

Every single one of Trump’s appointments are utterly useless.

Imagine that people tried to tell you “oh well, the really important thing about voting Republican is that they get to make the SCOTUS appointments.”

Writing the opinion, the chief justice, John Roberts, said that individuals can be temporarily disarmed if they pose a “credible threat to the physical safety of another” without violating the second amendment to the constitution that allows the right to bear arms.

“Since the founding, the nation’s firearm laws have included regulations to stop individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms,” he wrote.

Like what?

Dred Scott?

There actually is an argument that noncitizens don’t have any guaranteed Constitutional rights at all, so I don’t think that counts. This is the same court who extends all of these rights to non-citizens, however, so they can use a ban on non-citizens (blacks, specifically) owning guns to say “this is an example of humans not having a Second Amendment right.”

The judgment will come as a relief to gun control advocates who had feared that the ability to disarm dangerous people might fall prey to the radical interpretation of the second amendment advanced by the court’s conservative supermajority.

Merrick Garland, the US attorney general, welcomed the ruling as confirmation that “commonsense prohibition is entirely consistent” with the second amendment, adding that the justice department would “continue to enforce this important statute”.

…

The decision from the chief justice comes as a rebuke to the fifth circuit court of appeals which had previously ruled that the ban on gun possession for those under domestic violence restraining orders was unconstitutional.

…

In his opinion, Roberts framed the decision to continue the ban on gun possession by those under a domestic violence order as “common sense”. He wrote: “When an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed.”

Not that it even matters, but the law doesn’t even say the man has to have serious abused her. She can basically just tell the court he was mean to her, and you’ve got a 5AM raid with 17 ATF badge-niggers red-dotting you in your bed and walking you out of the house at gun point in your underwear. (This is one of many reasons I tell men to NEVER let their underwear “express their inner child.” None of this Spongebob boxers bullshit, homo. I mean, definitely wear boxers, because the balls were not meant to be restricted by tightness, but just get the Calvin Klein 100% organic cotton boxers. Nb4 “Calvin Klein is Jewish,” then I dunno bro, you got the money for Ralph Lauren? Just get normal, blank boxers. No exceptions.)

All forms of gun control are meant to push towards completely abolishing the right to own guns. The Second Amendment doesn’t exist, but there are still ways you can privately buy and own some types of guns without breaking the law.

Basically, these people want a situation where the only gun you can own in a shotgun or a musket, and even then, not in the city. They also want all guns controlled by some weird biometric shit, where only one person (or a series of people) can use the gun (this is in CyberPunk 2077, for the real niggas who play that game because they fixed it). This would even prevent people from raiding a police department or military depot and getting (usable) guns.

All gun control laws are about taking all guns. Period. From bans on fully-auto, to background checks, to other forms, to restrictions on felons of drug users, it’s a process of adding more and more hurdles and restrictions until they get to the point where there are so many restrictions that no one will even notice if they just say “actually, you can’t own guns anymore at all.”

BUT

Even if you believed that there was such a thing as “common sense gun control,” taking guns from a “domestic abuser” (anti-male slur for a man who keeps his woman in line), isn’t “common sense.” If I’m gonna kill my wife, the one thing I am not going to do is shoot her.

I’m gonna:

• Beat her to death with a crowbar
• Beat her to death with my bare hands
• Burn her alive
• Drown her in the bathtub
• Push her down the stairs
• Tie her to a pillar and stone her
• Feed her to wild animals
• Tie her to a concrete block and throw her off a bridge into the river
• Cut her belly open with a samurai sword and let her bleed out
• Push her into a vat of acid
• Throw her into a volcano
• Beat her to death with an iron skillet
• etc.

The only tie I could ever see a gun being involved in the murder of my wife would be pistol-whipping her to death.

So this is not even on par with that

See: The US Government is a Criminal Gang with No Legitimate Authority to Rule the American People

There is polling that shows gun control is popular.

I’m not really sure what you’re supposed to do about that.

Abortion and gay sex are also really popular.

If you talk to a random sample of people in a major city, it really seems like a majority of the country is getting the government it deserves.

Of course, the biggest problem is that woman and (to a lesser extent) brown people are allowed to vote, which is obviously illegitimate, even if you believe in the system.

I do not believe in the system. If the system was legitimate, you would automatically disqualify anyone running ads saying they’re going to take away your constitutional rights, and arrest and imprison them for sedition.

New York Post:

President Biden pulled the trigger on a new 30-second ad touting his support for gun control — just days after first son Hunter Biden was convicted on felony gun charges.

Following the Supreme Court ruling Friday to roll back a national ban on bump stocks, Biden quickly rolled out the 30-second spot where he also accused former President Donald Trump of being in the pocket of the National Rifle Association.

“When Trump was president— children gunned down in classrooms, innocent people killed in church and massacred at a concert. Still, Trump did nothing,” Biden said in the ad.

“He sided with the NRA, but I sided with you. I’ve expanded background checks, created an office of gun violence prevention, and now murder rates are down.”

Murder rates are not down. They went down slightly in 2023, but not as much as they went up after Biden took office.

Maybe that proves his point, but murder is not even related to how many guns there are or how easy it is to legally purchase a gun. Murder is related to black people using illegal guns (as well as other weapons, but mostly guns).

They went ape after the whole BLM thing and now appear to have chilled out.

And hey – what’s going on with the murder rate in Gaza?

How’s that going, Joe?

“You’re complicit in genocide. Stop sending weapons to Israel.”

A protester confronts Biden during an event in Washington D.C. against gun violence. v/ https://t.co/meWHTv3puh#GazaGenocide‌ pic.twitter.com/nWir5rsDNx

— 𝙂𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙩𝘾𝙤𝙙𝙞𝙣 (@GhostKodin) June 16, 2024

The SCOTUS is just responding to my articles saying the government should be completely abolished.

Seriously though, you should probably stock up on bump stocks while they’re temporarily legal.

It’s better to have them and not end up needing them than to end up needing them and not have them.

RT:

Only Congress has the authority to expand the machine gun ban to ‘bump stock’ devices, the US Supreme Court ruled on Friday, in a gun rights case technically about bureaucratic overreach.

Bump stocks are an add-on to rifles that allows the shooter to pull the trigger faster and more easily. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) outlawed them in 2018, arguing that they de facto turn rifles into machineguns, which have been restricted since 1934.

“We hold that a semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machine gun’ because it cannot fire more than one shot ‘by a single function of the trigger,’” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.

Six justices appointed by Republican presidents sided with the plaintiff, Texas gun shop owner Michael Cargill, over the Department of Justice and Attorney General Merrick Garland, who were defending the ATF action. The three Democrat-appointed justices dissented.

“The horrible shooting spree in Las Vegas in 2017 did not change the statutory text or its meaning,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion. “There is a simple remedy for the disparate treatment of bump stocks and machine guns. Congress can amend the law.”

Why doesn’t the Supreme Court go ahead and explain what happened that night in Las Vegas? I’d like to hear their ruling on that. Thus far, not one single government official has attempted to explain it.

It also might be nice to hear how banning machine guns doesn’t violate the US Constitution. That’s never been explained.

It says “shall not be infringed,” which are four very simple words.

This case wasn’t even about gun control, it was about the right of the ATF to make laws.

This is all just nonsense.

Whether it is the ATF or Congress, no one has a right to tell you what guns you can own (other than your dad if you’re a child).

Donald Trump never pushed back on this bump stocks ban and endorsed it. But he never pushed for a bump stocks ban in Israel.