groyper war – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png groyper war – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 The Groyper Revolution is Canceled After Nick Fuentes Revealed to be a Catboy and Gay Faggot https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/01/14/the-groyper-revolution-is-canceled-after-nick-fuentes-revealed-to-be-a-catboy-and-gay-faggot/ Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2020

Sorry, kids, but I’m going to have to cancel your revolution.

What you young folks don’t understand is that you can never hang out with an edgy comedian who makes jokes that boomers don’t understand, elsewise you’re a gay sonovabitch and a faggot catboy.

Nick Fuentes, famous groyper leader, violated this principle when he recorded a video with the Australian comedian lolisocks. Now, the show is over and you have to give up, kid.

You can’t meme your way out of this one, jerks.

Just look at what they’re saying on Reddit.

And if you don’t believe Reddit, then just check out all this Reddit spam on your precious “4chans.”

And if that doesn’t convince you, just check out this psychoanalysis in a YouTube comment proving that anyone who is celibate is a secretive catboy homosexual.

Get it, kids?

If you don’t want to date women, because you think the modern woman isn’t worth your time and is simply trying to suck out your lifeforce, it means you’re a catboy – and a catboy is the worst kind of gay faggot.

Your standard catboy (gay)

You youngins tried your “American Nationalist good optics and fun time may-mays” thing, but it turned gay and it turned catboy.

Now it’s over and we’re going back to this:

That’s a real man, right there.

You won’t catch him making an edgy joke, or talking to someone who made an edgy joke.

No siree.

He’s of pure Aryan revolutionary stock.

Good try though, you young kids – but you need to learn to respect your elders.

We know what we’re doing, alright?

We’ve been planning this neo-Nazi revolution for 70 years, so we’ve got a lot of experience.

We know that jokes won’t ever get you anywhere.

The path of the meme leads straight to the den of the catboy.

This is what will get you somewhere:

  • Dressing up a bunch of fat guys in neo-Nazi costumes and marching them through the street and shouting at people

This tried and true formula ALWAYS leads total Aryan victory over the Jews.

]]> BASED Jew Dave Smith Takes Down KIKE Jew Ben Shapiro https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/24/based-jew-dave-smith-takes-down-kiked-jew-ben-shapiro/ Sun, 24 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 24, 2019

Dave Smith, a Jewish Anarchist comedian, recently watched and commented on Ben Shapiro’s most recent speech on his university tour, wherein Shapiro attacked white people, yet again.

It’s quite a funny little clip.

Ben Shapiro: Let’s say you spend your days ranting about how conservatives and traditional classical liberals, you know, the sole protective force in America against the radical left “haven’t conserved anything.” You say that America is not a propositional or a credal nation, even though the nation’s founding document literally begins with the words “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights.”

Dave Smith: Alright, so let’s pause.

Here’s the problem. I mean, look. There’s a lot of problems with this argumentation … from Ben Shapiro. I mean, number one, like, Ben Shapiro will refer to himself as a libertarian. He’s a neocon who will refer to himself as a libertarian, so for him to criticize Alt-Right people for referring to themselves as conservatives, I don’t know what to say.

And then to use this definition, that well, anyone who talks about white culture or white society is now on the Alt-Right and they’re not the real conservatives because they say conservatives haven’t conserved anything, and then invoke the Founders – I mean, you can see what the irony is here, right?

Like, the Founders wrote about “free white men.” Like, the only people who could own land – the only people who could vote were “land-owning white men.” They were very explicit about this.

So actually, in that sense, if you’re going to invoke the Founding Fathers, they kind of would be the true conservatives. And this is coming from someone who is not a conservative, I’m a fucking radical anarchist, but you know – have the conservatives conserved anything? Well, I’m sure there’s something. But couldn’t you see where someone would make that argument?

Like, if you were to say, with conservative’s position in the 90s was that marriage was between a man and a woman – you can’t get away with that in politics today. Literally, that’s just now, no, that’s evil.

If up until 1965, our immigration policy was specifically designed to take in more white people – so really, couldn’t you call, basically anyone before 1965 could meet this definition of like, “white nationalist” or “Alt-Right.”

So I mean, meh. If I’m just calling balls and strikes here, I get their point. 

This is literally just an objective examination of the situation from an uninvolved party.

Dave Smith I’m sure isn’t really a based Jew. I’m sure he promotes all kinds of horrible things. But he is just saying “well, this isn’t really much of a debate, is it?”

These Ben Shapiros and Charlie Kirks have really backed themselves into a corner. I’m not even really pushing for a purely white nation. In particular, it is obviously impossible to get rid of all of these blacks.

My core positions on demographics are basically:

  • Deport all illegal immigrants
  • Declare all anchor babies and foreigners awarded citizenship after 1965 as having been given citizenship through fraud, and selectively remove citizenship from large numbers of them
  • Reintroduce some form of segregation with the blacks
  • Introduce policies to increase the white birthrate
  • Reintroduce laws against miscegenation

So, any of the Founding Fathers would have called me a cuck.

And my positions are harder than those of Nick Fuentes, who definitely hasn’t talked about stripping citizenship from anyone.

This discussion is just completely nonsensical, because Shapiro and these people are making this completely false claim that they, and not us, are somehow the inheritors of the legacy of the Founding Fathers.

If they just came out, like the liberals do, and say that the Founding Fathers were evil and we have to transform the country, then we could have an honest and open discussion about their planned transformation.

But right now, it’s just completely stupid. There is zero honesty coming from these people. And that is why they won’t have any form of debate. There is no room for it, because their entire position is so precarious.

]]> But Why are You Allowed to Make “Holocaust Denial” Jokes on Netflix Tho? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/21/but-why-are-you-allowed-to-make-holocaust-denial-jokes-on-netflix-tho/ Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 21, 2019

The Jewish media has attempted to crucify Nick Fuentes based on the fact that he made a joke about Cookie Monster baking six million cookies, which they claim is Holocaust denial. Sebastian Gorka, the Zionist Organization of America and innumerable shill “conservative,” as well as liberal pundits, have called for him to be banned for making this joke.

Virtually every media headline attacking him has referred to him as a “Holocaust denier,” attempting to make this Cookie Monster joke the defining aspect of his entire identity and in fact his entire existence as a human being on planet earth.

Even headlines about the blacklisting of Michelle Malkin noted that the hammer came down on her because she “backed a Holocaust denier.”

Nick has maintained, accurately, that this was nothing but an edgy joke.

As it turns out, a joke that is almost identical to this was made by Saturday Night Live alum Norm MacDonald on his Netflix show in 2017.

There are parts of this bit that are almost word-for-word to Nick’s bit, only it is clearly worse, because he doesn’t even disguise it with a Cookie Monster metaphor.

Norm Macdonald: You can’t ignore it? [talking to the guest] I ignore this fucker [pointing to Adam Eget] when he starts talking about the smokestacks at Auschwitz and how the shadows don’t make sense and all that shit. […] He said “how could there be poison, you know, poison gas, I don’t know much about the Holocaust, but what do they have inside the… inside the gas chambers they put a certain type of gas.”

Some production guy: Zyklon!

Macdonald: Zyklon gas! […] The guards would open the door and get the gas all over their hand [sic] and die also. Why would that not happen?

Guest: Maybe there was a sub door!

Macdonald: But he had another thing. He said when the allied planes came over they had pictures apparently of the smokestacks, and he said the smokestacks drop a shadow, the smokestacks, that we all know spewed out the sad remains of human souls that once had dreams, and once love. He says “it’s all a bunch of horseshit!”

And then everyone laughed.

Where exactly was the outrage over this?

Well, according to google.com, there literally wasn’t any.

It was taken for what it was – a joke – and no one bothered to write a single article complaining or condemning it.

In actual fact – though I don’t have the clips on hand, I’ve watched the show – this was a running gag on Norm’s Netflix show, where he would accuse his co-host, comedian Adam Eget (who I believe is half Jewish), of being a Holocaust denier, and go into all kinds of details of the sort that we read in Ron Unz’s (also part Jewish) American Pravda series on “Holocaust Denial.”

It’s Fake, Jim

All of this outrage over Nick’s “Holocaust denial” is a hoax.

The entire conservative establishment, and the entire media, is shifting all of this massive discussion that Nick has started about crippling demographic change, the collapse of Christian morality and the dual-loyalty of our political establishment onto a two-minute clip of the guy making an edgy joke.

This is for the purpose of saying “he is evil, so nothing he says matters.”

The problem that they’re having is that it isn’t working.

It always worked before.

But this time it isn’t working.

There is only one other person that “yeah but he’s evil though, everyone needs to hate him, because he made an evil joke” didn’t work on, and that was me.

But I was never anywhere near the establishment the way Nick is. All I was was a very popular internet humorist. They responded to the Anglin Problem by blacklisting me from being mentioned in the media, deplatforming me from everything, and never mentioning my name again as if it was a killing word. (Plus a bunch of other stuff I won’t go into here, but which the reader is likely aware of.)

But you can’t do that to Nick. He’s too big now and he is too close to the mainstream. He’s also too clean.

We’re all on the edge of our seats, wondering what happens now.

I’m predicting their next actions will be erratic and insane.

]]> Michelle Malkin is MY MOMMY and How Dare You Talk to Her! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/20/michelle-malkin-is-my-mommy-and-how-dare-you-talk-to-her/ Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 20, 2019

Michelle Malkin was fired from Young America’s Foundation (YAS) over the weekend for supporting Nick Fuentes. She is being attacked and condemned as a white supremacist race hater Holocaust denier anti-Semite.

She is pretty well blacklisted totally, but she appeared on a local talk radio show on Tuesday to explain the details of the situation.

She said of our Supreme Leader and his Glorious Crusade:

So who is Nick Fuentes? He’s a 21-year-old Boston University dropout who’s become very popular on the internet, has a lot of young fans and young followers who are new to the America First movement. And he has become a target because he urged a lot of his young followers, people who watch him on social media, who read his work, to show up at conservative events and ask the very kind of tough questions that I have been asking for 25 plus years.

This has caused a lot of disruption and in fact a lot of the people who have called him the same names that they are calling me have not bothered to watch any more than a few clips of him that are circulated by left-wing hit men from Media Matters who have accused me of being quote “an anti-Semite,” even though I’m married to the great-grandson of Ukrainian Jews who came here to escape the pogroms. I’ve been called a white supremacist, as you’ve mentioned, as has he.

From what I’ve listened to and watched of him for hours and hours and hours now, that is not what I’ve seen and unlike a lot of the people who are just circulating these smears, I’ve actually been on college campuses, and met many of the kids, I’ve talked to many of the kids, who asked uncomfortable questions at these events, where they challenged Republicans like Charlie Kirk and Dan Crenshaw and Ben Shapiro about the very apocalyptic numbers that we are seeing now, the demographic conquest that is happening that I’ve been warning about for 25+ years, as a result of mass, uncontrolled migration.

So I was blacklisted from YAS for two speeches I gave that anybody can read online the entire transcripts and the entire videos are on there and I dare any one of the people who are accusing me of hatred, of bigotry, of hating Jews, of hating immigrants, to quote me one line – not only in those two speeches, but in my entire 25 plus career – of saying any of the things that people are calling me now.

…

I support the kids who ask these questions that need to be asked that the establishment and the Republican party doesn’t want to be asked, and I’m not going to disavow anybody.

…

What’s happened is they’re being shut down. The entire – every single last one of these young men, many of whom I’ve been in contact with, on campuses at Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Ohio State University, Texas A&M, Arizona State University – these are good kids. And rather than spurn them, rather than ostracize them, rather than smear them without knowing anything about their background, these are exactly the kind of patriotic kids we should be welcoming, and they know way more about immigration than the people who have been designated leaders to advocate for open borders.

Perfect.

This is exactly perfect.

This is precisely what we were looking for and what we needed. She is a mainstream figure who is putting everything on the line for us. She is making it so they cannot simply shut us up. They all look insane calling her a white supremacist.

And they don’t believe it. Everyone knows that they don’t believe it. All it is is a demand that she bow down to the masters – disavow Nick Fuentes and apologize, or face being called mean names forever, face being blacklisted forever.

And she is telling them a word that they have never heard before:

They cannot do anything at all but lash out in this irate, manic, insane way against her. And if she doesn’t cuck, then what can they do? What are even their options?

Their decision as it stands right now is to just keep calling her names.

Ultimo-cuck David French of the National Review – who literally looks like one of the worm creatures from The Little Mermaid – was just out there doing it.

And she told him he’s an SPLC shill and he needs to stop talking to her kids.

Nick also told the worm creature not to talk to our mommy that way.

“Out of touch” doesn’t even begin to describe it.

These people’s minds are going orbital.

They built an entire empire of lies and evil, and were going to sit pretty and rich atop the corpse of this country – and they would have gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for those meddling kids and that Filipina mommy of theirs!

And bro.

She’s not just talking about immigration.

She went to war with Dan Crenshaw over his insane “no free speech for those who question infinity billions to Israel” agenda.

And she’s sticking to that.

She’s fighting SPLC shills.

She’s pointing out that all of these people are parroting the George Soros shill Jared Holt.

We probably would have expected that it would be Ann playing this role. Michelle just kind of popped up out of nowhere – and rolled in with a tank.

This all may seem weird and unexpected and sort of confusing.

But I will tell you two things, my dearest brothers in arms:

  1. God moves in a mysterious way
  2. The Lord will provide

That is all you need to understand right now.

The weirder the path to victory, the more you can be certain that only God could have made it happen.

Continue doing what you know is right, continue to follow God, and victory will be ours.

We are fallen men, huddled in the broken ruins of the glorious civilization God gave our ancestors.

But Christ is risen, His Kingdom is in Heaven and everything beneath it belongs to Him.

It is His will that will be done.

If He has given it unto us to shake the earth, then shake it shall.

]]> Stefan Molyneux Cucks on Groypers Because of Muh Holocaust https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/20/stefan-molyneux-cucks-on-groypers-because-of-muh-holocaust/ Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 20, 2019

Firstly, I don’t think Cookie Monster could bake all those cookies in 4 ovens with wooden doors.

Secondly, even if he did, that’s not my problem. I don’t live on Sesame Street, and I’ve never cooked a single cookie in my life.

More importantly, the number of cookies baked has nothing to do with the number of immigrants flooding my country, the fact that Jews are doing tranny story hour at libraries in my country, or sending $3.8 billion to Israel annually.

Stefan Molyneux has flip-flopped again.

I was really pulling for him. I thought he’d found Jesus and was going to be doing the right thing going forward. But I guess he was lying about that as he’s lied about so much else.

He’s tweeted his support for the alleged Holocaust, and he’s unfollowed Nick Fuentes on Twitter.

Nick wrote on Telegram on Tuesday:

Oof got unfollowed by Stefan Molyneux. Very disappointed in him

He disavowed “making light of the Holocaust.” Idk man like what are you trying to prove and to whom? I’m wondering what all these other people who have gotten the same smear job treatment as me think they have to gain with these performative disavowals.

Is any Leftist or conservative inc hack going to say wow well Molyneux disavowed Nick, now we’re going to forget everything he said about race realism and so on? Very sad. Some are rising to the occasion and others are disappointing us greatly.

I don’t know where my trajectory will take me but I hope I will never disappoint my generation and the next generation like some of these older vanguards have disappointed me.

As I’ve been saying throughout this whole affair: it might not mean anything now and it might not mean anything ever but know this: we will not forget who said what about this conflict and when they said it.

And understand, it’s not about me— it’s about whether or not you will submit to this corrupt system, whether or not you will put your money where your mouth is. I’m a pundit, this is a business where people talk for a living, but who actually walks the walk? That’s what this is about.

I will never genuflect towards conservative inc, the time to stand and fight is now. If you’re not prepared for that then you’re not serious and you should just stop wasting everyone’s time.

So, that was Stefan’s last chance.

He is evil, he is a supporter of evil, he is siding with evil, he is the enemy.

This is the reality now:

You are either with us or you are against us.

And we are keeping track.

We are making lists.

The time to choose is now.

Stefan Molyneux just made a choice, and he’s going to live with the consequences of that choice, whatever they may be.

]]> GROYPED: Michael Knowles Cancels OSU Event! YAF in Full Retreat! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/20/michael-knowles-cancels-osu-event-yaf-in-full-collapse/ Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 20, 2019

Following the fallout from the blacklisting of Mommy Michelle, Turning Point USA allied group “YAF” is in full retreat, and has ceded Ohio in its entirety to Groyper forces.

(By the way – I don’t know if “YAF” stands for “Young America’s Foundation” or “Young Americans for Freedom.” They appear to claim that this acronym stands for both things. Sort of a non-binary acronym, if you will.)

Daily Wire writer Michael Knowles, a race traitor who works for Jews, has officially canceled his appearance at OSU after a less than stellar performance earlier this week, when he got completely and totally GROYPED.

The official YAF account did not even issue a statement, instead leaving it to the local chapter, who made the absurd claim that they couldn’t find a room to put the event.

You cocksuckers should have known better than to ever come to OHIO!

OSU was of course where the first major battle of the Groyper War happened, when Charlie Kirk and his gaynigger were utterly destroyed by our lads.

The Geneva Conventions were completely thrown out at that event, let me tell you.

On Monday, Knowles appeared at the University of Kentucky, and was brutally groyped.

(Questions start at 20:30)

There were no less than FIVE Groypers.

1.) Why Do You Love Trannies?

He doesn’t know what the word “acceptance” means.

Groyper 1: What an excellent pinstripe suit!

Knowles: Thank you!

Groyper 1: Very nice. Your speech was lovely, thank you for being here. I agreed with almost every single point you made. However I have a single question, and that would be, on October 26, you posted a picture of yourself with a, I’m not sure if it was a drag queen –

Knowles: A drag queen named Lady MAGA.

Groyper 1: Yes, Lady MAGA. My question is, with the title of this tour being “Men are not Women,” how is posing with, and giving implicit, you know, what would seem to be acceptance, how is that congruent with your message that men are not women?

Knowles: I don’t think it – And that’s a good question. I’m not sure exactly what you mean by acceptance. The title of this tour is Men are not Women, I probably would get along easier if I was less clear about my views. I would suggest in all things, particularly in politics that we strive for clarity and charity. I was at Politicon, where there are a lot of colorful characters. Some of them were even more colorful than Lady MAGA. And I was at a reception there and I had a nice conversation with this guy, Lady MAGA, very nice guy. In many of his views very conservative. I think he has publicly referred to “LGBT” as a cult, he has publicly opposed Drag Queen Story Hour, and actually in his views on gender ideology, his dresses aside, he actually seems to hold a more traditional view than most people on the left and some on the right today. But obviously we don’t agree on all aspects of the ideology of gender or the sexual revolution, but he was a very nice guy, and I think it’s very important to be able to have a conversation with somebody and have a nice interaction. Feel free to take a photo. I’ve never hid my views, certainly I don’t hide my views on this tour, but it is very important to not discriminate in our social interactions with people. I mean, these people no matter how much we disagree, forget even wearing a dress, I mean even people who are in antifa; it’s very important that we are able to communicate in a self-government such as ours because ultimately these are our countrymen. And particularly for those of us on the right, and I tend to consider myself as slightly to the right of Genghis Khan, you know, not everyone is going to agree with my point of view, but if we can speak to our fellow countrymen perhaps there is a chance that we can reach them.

2.) What is This “America is an Idea” Bullshit, Faggot?

What is the meaning of this faggotry?

Groyper 2: Hello Mr. Knowles. Well first of all, I want to say in regards to that last question, I think that to what he may have been referring to was that the caption to that picture was “A star is born.” So for people who are not as well-tuned into the kind of social atmosphere at these Politicon events, they may have been confused when later on they went to your tour that is titled “Men are not Women.”

Knowles: I tweeted out that line that said “A star is born,” it referenced to Lady Gaga, not the same as Lady MAGA. But if somebody reads that and interprets that I am in favor of the sexual revolution and they are gonna come to my talk and hear a lot about gender theory, I think that’s a great idea, because then I can get them to be here under false pretenses and then I’ll teach them a little truth.

Groyper 2: Well, I gotta give you that Gaga and MAGA do rhyme, but to my question, and this is a bit of a different topic, but there’s been a kind of far left idea that has entered mainstream thought lately and that has been espoused by many conservative leaders. I don’t know what you have said on it, but the idea is that America is a creedal nation. That is to say that we are not defined by our people or by our land, but rather that we are defined by our ideas, that we supposedly all hold. Now, you know as well as I do that democrats do not share our same values. They don’t believe in the Constitution, they don’t believe in 2nd Amendment rights, they don’t believe that the unborn are alive humans, they don’t believe in Christian values, so logically following, would you not agree that democrats then are not American?

Knowles: So, I am not of the opinion that America is merely a creed. That it’s just some creed floating in the air that has no relation to any land or any people or any history. That obviously is untrue. Nor am I of the opinion that America has no creed. America clearly has a creed, it was founded by some of my ancestors on the Mayflower, and they had very strong beliefs, and by the people who signed the Declaration of Independence and fought the Revolutionary War, and fought in – some of my ancestors as well, speaking of people – and who fought with Washington, and ratified the Constitution. They clearly had strong beliefs about the country. And it was a country that was founded in a way that is unique in world history. It does not come from antiquity, but rather it was settled by people who came here in boats, many of whom were religious zealots, and whose creed was their whole life. Their creed and their belief in Christ, in particular. So I think that this conversation has become very muddled, because it’s a country; if you took every single american of every belief, and every race, and every sex, and every sexual preference, if you took them all and replaced them with some random people, that wouldn’t be America anymore. That wouldn’t make any sense. But likewise we are not merely a country of blood and soil. We do have many ideas, and it’s important that we think about those ideas because America is exceptional in the world. This is not to say rah rah, we are the greatest nation and we can apply what happened in America to every single place on earth, but we are exceptional, that is part of our history. So for conservatives to trace their philosophy through something like traditionalism, or referring to the great history and heritage of this country – to ignore that creedal aspect is to ignore an essential part of our history and tradition.

Groyper 2: Well, I am glad that hear that we agree. Seriously. You know, I agree that we are defined by our ancestors and our forefathers, our Founding Fathers, and that while even though we have some great ideas in the Constitution, that’s not what makes America America. Part of it, but not primarily, and I only insist on that point of view just because it’s been espoused by, if I may drop names, Charlie Kirk, Shapiro, you may know him.

Knowles: I know those guys, I’m friends with those guys.

Groyper 2: Yeah and I’m not saying that they are necessarily bad people, I’ve never met them. And this is the first time I’ve met you. But I am just glad to know that we do both, at least in this respect disagree with those people in that America are a real people and that if the entire population of Europe came over and replaced us, it would not be America anymore.

Knowles: Yes can you imagine all those German socialists.

Groyper 2: Yeah a lot of Germans came over after World War 2 and look how that turned out, right?

Knowles: Yeah, I agree, and to defend Ben and Charlie a little bit, I believe their views have been misrepresented. I don’t think that really in their heart of hearts regard America as a total abstraction. These are smart people and I think they think clearly about politics, and that if you get hung up on one soundbite, or you get an answer that perhaps they meant to use one or two words differently or something, so that’s one thing. But they both have a long track record, so I don’t want their views misrepresented, because they are both sophisticated thinkers, and really what our discussion is right now is over how much of the country is creedal and how much of it is an historical and geographic reality. And to pretend that it’s a simpler question than that I think is disingenuous.

He is quicker on his feet than a lot of these people.

But I still don’t understand how Democrats are Americans, or how he is able to just completely change his entire position.

3.) Do Demographics Even Exist?

Michael Knowles argues that the LA Times is lying about the fact that California used to be Republican and is now Democrat. Because they are liberals. Maybe there aren’t even any Mexicans in California. Maybe the liberal media just made it up?

It’s almost unbelievable that he literally said this.

Groyper 3: Hello. An article was recently published in the LA Times titled “California’s Changing Demographics Will Further Doom Republicans.” It starts out with democrats dominate politics in California and republicans are doomed for one simple reason: shifting demographics. It goes on to state that California is the future, and that it tends to be more non-Caucasian than most states but we’re heading into that for the rest of the nation. And with how republicans are doing in California, they’ve got to figure how to compete here or it’s the Ice Age for them. So my question is: will conservatives like yourself acknowledge what democrats already know? That is, that demographics is destiny, or is that truth a little too uncomfortable for you?

Knowles: I can’t believe you just referred to the LA Times as the truth, that’s an amazing thing. I know I won’t acknowledge that thing democrats believe in is truth because I think it’s not backed up by historical reality. To give a few examples, five of the whitest states in the country – what are the five whitest states? We’ve got Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, West Virginia and Montana. Three out of those five states voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Very, very, white states. Of those five states, by the way, four of them voted for democratic senators, leftist senators, in 2018. That doesn’t seem very good for the whiteness argument. When you look at diverse states, not all diverse states, not all, but some, such as Texas and Florida, they have voted reliably republican in recent years. On to the point of demographics being destiny, of course the left is desirous of mass migration because they think that if they flood the country without any sort of assimilation, if they discourage assimilation, that they will be able to dominate the electorate. That’s part of their plan. But the idea that voting patterns are somehow hardwired into DNA is simply untrue and I can prove it in a few different ways. For instance, right now black voters identify heavily with the Democratic Party, eighty-five to ninety percent at some points. This was not always the case, as recently as the mid 1940s, black voters were about evenly matched democrat and republican, and what caused that shift some people say was the New Deal but the timeline doesn’t even add up so much there. Actually if you look at the exact date that things really started to tip it was 1948 when President Truman desegregated, or rather integrated, the military. So you saw democratic presidents taking up the mantle of civil rights, saying that they care about black people. And then of course, President Kennedy and President Johnson get credit for the Civil Rights Act, which cemented at least in recent memory black support for democrats. I’ll give you another example: Hispanic voters are not monolithically or racially determined in their votes. How do I know that? Because of course, of the Cubans. Of all the Hispanic voters, Cubans even today favor republicans, they favor conservatives. Now, the trouble is, generationally, that starts to slip, so the Cuban immigrants favor conservatives. Even the children of Cuban immigrants favor conservatives. But when you get to the grandchildren of Cuban immigrants, that’s when we start to have a problem, because they start to veer towards the left. Obviously that’s not a racial problem. They have the same race as their grandparents. Obviously that’s not an immigration problem. The immigrants are conservative than their grandkids. What appears to me more likely is that it is a problem of education. Particularly in an educational apparatus that from K to 12, and all the way through college and all the way through your masters and your PhD if stick on for that, you were told that America is evil, conservatism is evil, and leftism is wonderful. It is eminently clear to me that race is a minor, minor factor here and that ideas are the issue so if we want to win moving forward I think we need to stop these ridiculous and bigoted ideas that race somehow determines what you think about politics and move on to a more human understanding, and frankly, a more reasonable and civilized understanding of politics.

Groyper 3: Just last year in the 2018 midterms whites were the only group to vote predominantly republican. African-Americans voted 90% democrat, Hispanic 69%, so why does it matter if they were more republican in the past than today?

Knowles: Because it shows that it’s not racially determined. Which would appear to be your position when you say demographics are destiny. So if they are not racially determined then something else is at work here, which is exactly my point, and it would seem to not be your point.

Groyper 3: If I may ask, then, when will they start voting for republicans again?

Knowles: Well, I’ve got to tell you that you guys who push an exclusively racial politics aren’t really helping the situation very much in my opinion. And if my thesis is correct that the perception of one political party embracing black voters, and another political party shunning them was a major motivator for the black support for the left, and that would seem to be borne out by historical reality, then what I would recommend is we not speak with racially exclusive language and with political ideologies that really don’t seem to bear much with regard to reality in the reality of how we think about politics and the human person.

4.) A Negroyper! BBGs Rise Up!

Let’s just call Nick a racist cookie denialist then.

Negroyper: Good evening Mr. Knowles. Thank you for coming to our university. We conservatives are lonely here so we’re glad to have you here.

Knowles: Thanks for inviting me, it’s a pleasure to be here.

Negroyper: Now, okay, so. Uhm, my question, it relates to uh, the topic of freedom of speech, and the things that we are allowed to talk about in the conservative movement. It’s about the type of opinions that are newly being accepted and the things that we want to have more accepted. Something I’m concerned about in our movement is – and this concerns you because you work for Ben Shapiro. He’s a great guy, people like you and him got me into philosophy. And about you and Shapiro is that, yes, I know you consider yourself a Roman Catholic, and we know Mr. Shapiro to have some Jewish, I mean –

Knowles: I’m pretty sure he is Jewish. He wears the hat, says the prayers, I think he may be Jewish.

Negroyper: And I like that, it’s good that we have that kind of people. Now, concerning what we are allowed to talk about, and you working for him, there are some soft spots in our movement and when working for a publication like the Daily Wire, so I’ll say that I consider myself someone who sees what the Groypers are doing like a necessary act, we need some recognition. I’ve been listening to too much of Nicholas Fuentes, who is a great guy, and there is a picture of you two together, so I assume that you know the kind of things that he and us believe in, and these things we think are very important, rather than for example the stuff that we heard tonight, which was great stuff, and stuff that has helped me a lot, but–

Knowles: Do you have a particular opinion that you object of mine, or opinion that you wish I held? That’s where it seems the question is going.

Niggroyper: Not necessarily, but I would like to know if you see yourself talking more about the kind of stuff that Nicholas J. Fuentes talks about.

Knowles: What in particular would you like me to talk about?

(Someone in the audience says Israel)

Knowles: I talk about Israel a fair bit.

Negroyper: Yeah I’ve recently watched your video covering the embassy movement, but I think some elephants in the room like Sheldon Adelson should be brought up and, concerning that issue, but I would say that talking more freely about Israel and Israeli influence would be good. We have a special relationship with that country, but I think that in our movement opinions about that state, and – Saudi Arabia, we can talk about them freely, but the state of Israel, we have a special relationship with them, and I think we should talk about that more.

Knowles: I do talk about it. Do you have a particular opinion that you would like me to discuss? Because you mentioned that I have a photo with this guy, Nick Fuentes, and it’s true. I met him at Politicon, but I didn’t know who he was. He came to me and acted as if he were a fan of my show. Now, after googling him, I gather that he is not a fan of my show, but he pretended at least. He came up to me, lied, and we took a picture, just like I took a picture with three hundred other people, and then he goes on the internet and pretends that we had a conversation, or that we agree with one another – not at all. I didn’t know who this guy was. So you say he is a nice guy, he didn’t behave like a nice guy to me.

Negroyper: Have you heard his name in the recent Groyper Uprising?

Knowles: Oh yeah, I’ve been reading the news, so I’ve seen him come up. But what’s interesting is that when he had the opportunity to speak to me – I mean, he came up to me – he didn’t bring any opinion of his, he didn’t ask me any questions, he didn’t try to debate any point. Perhaps he didn’t have all that much to say to my face, but rather wanted to troll with that photograph. And that’s not a terribly serious thing to do. And you bring up whether I’ll talk about the things that the Groypers talk about, and I think that I talk about all the issues that we are all here talking about tonight. We talked about immigration, we talked about tax policy, we talked about Israel. I talk about all those things. What I object to with that guy in particular is what I think is very clearly racial bigotry. And I object to racial bigotry because it is an affront against human dignity and it’s a denial of the image of God.

Negroyper: It doesn’t affect me.

Knowles: There is no accounting for taste, I suppose. But as far as I’m concerned, it’s pretty ugly and with a guy like that, who lied to my face, and then lied on the internet, then called my colleague “Shabbos goy race traitor,” and then threatened my other colleague with a switchblade, I think that’s not the nicest guy in the world, that’s my opinion. Oh, he also denied the Holocaust and supported Jim Crow, I forgot to mention that.

(Someone in the crowd says “he did not!”)

Knowles: He did. It’s on video, you can check it out. For the home audience, you can check it out.

5.) Wherein Knowles Admits He Understands the Term “Shabbos Goy Race Traitor”

If he knows what it is, then how can he explain that he isn’t that?

Groyper 5: Hi, Mr. Knowles. First I wanna say that I’m a big fan. I feel like a lot of the times in the past you’ve defended Christian values and I respect you for that. Even with issues that may not be so popular, such as, you know, same-sex marriage, or that men are not women. My question is also regarding the event, Politicon, in which Mr. Nicholas J. Fuentes took a picture with you and then only an hour and twenty minutes afterwards you tried to slander him by associating him with racial bigotry and the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right, which you’ve described as Godless. Now, Mr. Fuentes disavows racial hatred. He also has a lot of minority supporters, as we’ve seen at recent events. A lot of minority supporters have come out in favor of him. So I don’t think it’s really fair to characterize him as a racial bigot. And he’s also a devout Christian. And the reason I mentioned this specifically – obviously a picture in itself doesn’t mean anything. You don’t have to agree with anything that someone who takes a picture with you says, such as with Lady MAGA. But my issue is that you have a very different reaction when it comes to either of them. When it comes to a young America First conservative like Mr. Fuentes you slander them them trying to–

Knowles: I’ve never slandered that person. I’ll explain to you what happened and why I’m much more happy to take a photo with a person like Lady MAGA, who obviously we’re very different people, but agree on certain things than I am with somebody like Nick Fuentes. Lady MAGA is a nice guy and we had a nice conversation. We were very open and it was a good-faith discussion. On the other hand, Nick Fuentes lied to my face, then lied about me on the internet and then only when I figured out who he was because I googled him I realized and some might try to refute this in the room but it’s all on video that he has endorsed Jim Crow segregation, has denied that the Holocaust happened, and has associated himself with Fascism openly. He said that if Antifa were fascist he would be marching alongside them. He has associated in the past with avowed racial bigots like James Allsup and Richard Spencer though apparently now they’re having something of a tiff, from what I gather on the blogs. It is quite clear to me that he harbors racial bigotry. That’s why I reject his politics. The reason I reject his photo is because he lied to my face and about me. Nothing in that is in good faith. I would take a million photos with Lady MAGA before I would give a person who would do that the time of day.

Groyper 5: The reason I bring that up is because I feel like you are actually slandering him because I don’t think that he lied to you when he said that he’s a fan of your show. I do believe that you both agree on a lot of the same things.

Knowles: I mean he referred to our outlet as a bunch of Shabbos goy race traitors, so I don’t think he’s a huge fan of us.

Groyper 5: That wasn’t to the outlet itself, I believe that was to Matt Walsh in particular.

Knowles: He only threatened one of us and called the other one a race traitor but maybe he likes me, I don’t know. I think it’s pretty clear from his streams, many of which I’ve now watched, that he is not a huge fan of my work or my beliefs.

Well, at least he’s now watching Nick.

And actually, we sort of are fans of some of the Daily Wire stuff. Unlike Charlie Kirk, they at least pretend to be against sodomy and trannies and the total destruction of men and the family.

Which makes them harder to hit.

But his Jew masters believed this looked bad enough that they canceled the OSU engagement immediately afterward.

Because Kentucky did good, but Ohio would have crushed this Shabbos Goy Race Traitor.

They’re being quiet about the retreat.

But this is a big win, lads.

]]> Literal Homosexual Plagiarist Benny Johnson Dumps Cache of Hilarious Nick Fuentes Clips! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/19/literal-homosexual-plagiarist-benny-johnson-dumps-cache-of-hilarious-fuentes-clips/ Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 19, 2019

Talking Points USA individual Benny Johnson is a literal plagiarist who was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarism in 2014. Literally for 41 instances of it. Buzzfeed editor Ben Smith himself had to issue an official apology.

41 out of 500 articles! Nearly 10%!

He was then caught in a plagiarism scandal just a year later in 2015 while working for the Independent Journal Review.

I am a writer and I have to tell you: this is literally the absolute worst thing a writer can ever do. It is on par with simply outright faking news. This difference is that you are much, much more likely to get caught plagiarizing than you are faking news.

If we are to make an analogy, a writer committing plagiarism is like a dentist having sex with a patient while they are under sedation.

It is incredible that he was rehired at all after getting fired from Buzzfeed for this disreputable act, but for him to do the same trick again is simply astonishing. Or you would be astonished by it. Having interacted with journalists myself, I am aware that they are basically no different than child molesters in that they cannot ever be rehabilitated.

Speaking of child molestation, Johnson is also a literal homosexual, so it’s of course statistically very likely he is also a child molester. Though he hasn’t be caught for that, so we can only speculate based on statistics.

I thought the tricky cocksucker was completely useless.

But it turns out he has great taste in Nick Fuentes clips.

On Monday night, he compiled some ABSOLUTE FIRE.

As Nick himself points out, these clips are kino af.

Others responded by pointing out that Benny appears to not understand what jokes are.

I don’t know why Benny would think a series of clips that makes a man look so good would make him look bad.

Seems he really has very poor judgement.

The other thing here is: people seeing these clips are going to start asking questions. Nick asks why it is that we are still hearing about the horror of Jim Crow water fountains. He says “who cares?” And people seeing that are very likely to ask “yeah, who does care? Why are we still hearing about this? Who actually gives a shit about these water fountains?”

Do they want people asking these sorts of questions?

Furthermore, we must ask: where did all of these clips come from? Who organized them? As Nick pointed out on his show last night, a lot of them are from shows that are no longer public. So who has been collecting all of this? A month ago, Charlie Kirk claimed he didn’t know who Nick Fuentes was.

So are they getting this from Jared Holt of the George Soros funded Right Wing Watch? Or where exactly?

The Jew Fears the Lulz

To be honest – and I prefer honesty, as I believe it is the best policy – I’ve faced this same issue with people not respecting my humor and thinking it is all 100% serious. Or pretending to think that.

This all has me thinking about something I wrote immediately after Charlottesville. I was banned from literally everything, but for whatever reason, WordPress.com at the time allowed me to post personal thoughts. I called it “Letters from Internet Prison.” I revealed a thing that all my readers knew, which I thought might interest some academics (it did, and a few contacted me about it) and future historians: I’m not actually a “White Supremacist Neo-Nazi,” nor do I even know what that is. I am an edgy internet comedian.

WordPress has since deleted the thing, but here’s a screenshot of the most relevant part of the thing:

I’ve obviously gone a whole lot further than Nick.

Someone had to go all the way to the edge to open this thing up and give room for slightly less EDGE on them jokes.

But it’s fundamentally the same exact thing. No one actually believes that I’m planning to gas Jews, or whatever. Even though it’s in the first paragraph of my Wikipedia page.

I’ve also advocated for the legalization of rape, and people tried to add that to my Wikipedia page (with a “mainstream source”), and it was removed because it points to the absurdity of pretending that an edgy comedian isn’t joking.

You know, my elderly grandma, God bless her soul, used to watch the old Steven Colbert show on Comedy Central, where he played the character of an outrageous right-winger. She didn’t understand that it was a bit, and thought that he was actually an outrageous right winger.

We are allowed to make jokes.

It isn’t against the law yet.

Nick’s jokes, collected by Benny the criminal plagiarist, are funny. Rebellion against an authoritarian system of absolute humorlessness is necessarily funny.

And that’s the reason they want Nick shut down. It’s the same reason they wanted me shut down. They don’t shut down David Duke or Richard Spencer, do they? Humorless actors continue to act with impunity in these tubes, specifically because they are humorless.

The point I am trying to get at here – and make sure you catch this, because it is extremely big brained – is that these clips are considered dangerous not because of the ostensibly “beyond the pale” politically incorrect content, but because they are funny.

Humor disarms this system, because they have no response to it. They fear lulz more than anything else.

If, tomorrow, Nick goes out with a straight face and tells the press that, like, Jews should be rounded up and killed, or blacks should be put back into slavery, nobody panics, because it’s all “part of the plan”. But when he makes one little Cooke Monster joke, well then everyone loses their minds.

]]> Apollonian Filipina Takes on Zioclops and His Jewish Anti-Free Speech Agenda https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/19/filipina-titan-takes-on-zioclops-and-his-jewish-anti-free-speech-agenda/ Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 19, 2019

Michelle Malkin truly is a hero on a level we have not seen.

We haven’t seen it from Ann Coulter, we haven’t seen it from Tucker Carlson.

We’ve seen it only from her. And of course Alex Jones and others who aren’t in the mainstream. But from the mainstream, she is flying solo as the singular defender of America First.

At first I thought she was just going to stay on the immigration issue, while defending Nick Fuentes and the Groypers. But on Monday she just randomly started attacking Zioclops Dan Crenshaw for saying that people who don’t support Israel can’t have First Amendment rights.

I’m extremely proud of Michelle.

Today she tweeted a direct link to Nick’s latest show.

It was a particularly inspired one, by the way. They’ve all been particularly inspired lately, but he went through the histories of his enemies and I could just feel the spirit of God talking through him. (Though he needs to edit out those intros. Bro, I say this as your biggest fan: after you go off air, cut out the 30-minute music intro. It is bad enough you can’t get the podcast up on time, but trying to skip to the part where the talking starts on a phone is a tedious act no man should have to endure.)

I lived in the Philippines during some of my formative years, and I always thought they were fundamentally good people. Which is more than you can say about most groups on this planet. If we were destined to be a multiracial nation, I wish we would have ended up with 40 million Filipinos instead of these 40 million niggers.

Just joking, folks.

Some edgy humor there.

No it isn’t.

Punish the Zioclops

Honestly, I think Crenshaw more or less totally killed any long term political viability with that statement.

He literally said “if you don’t support Israel, you can’t have First Amendment rights,” and even the most aggressive Israel supporters don’t share that view.

He really is a dumb sonovabitch.

It would have been so easy for him to just spit out some nonsense about how it doesn’t actually violate the First Amendment. I mean, the people who promote it claim that it doesn’t (even though it can’t and won’t stand up to a SCOTUS ruling, which is inevitable).

Instead, he says that if you are against “the only Jewish state” then you are an anti-Semite and you can’t have free speech.

Even if that statement itself isn’t enough to destroy his career, the stupidity of actually saying that out loud certainly is. All of the big Jews who created this cycloptic bastard are going to start pulling support.

My advice to Dan is twofold:

  1. Grow a longer beard, to increase the illusion that you have a jawline.
  2. Lose your other eye and wear double eye patches to increase the illusion that you’re some kind of badass.

Furthermore, thank you for your service and move to Israel you cocksucker.

]]> National Review Writer Will Nardi Says Michelle Malkin Deserves to be Banned from Social Media https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/19/national-review-writer-will-nardi-says-michelle-malkin-deserves-to-be-banned-from-social-media/ Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
November 19, 2019

Will Nardi is a truly principled conservative who believes that people who disagree with him should be banned from social media.

As a result of the groyper war, fake conservative incorporated is fully revealing themselves to be no different than the leftists they claim to fight. Will Nardi, a writer for the National Review, just told Michelle Malkin that she deserved to be de-platformed for not disavowing Nick Fuentes. He also seemed to take great satisfaction in telling her that she would suffer financially for straying off of the fake conservative plantation.

It’s also funny to see Nardi claiming that Fuentes is gaslighting people.

The only gaslighting is coming from fake conservative incorporated who have resorted to using out of context video clips and lies in their pathetic attempts to discredit Fuentes.

Nardi previously said that he supports tech censorship.

He also celebrated when Fuentes had his podcast removed from Apple iTunes.

There is literally no difference between what Jewish groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League have been doing and what fake conservative incorporated is currently doing. They’re both pushing for people to be banned off of the big social media sites for simply having views that they disagree with.

Before Nardi said that Malkin deserved to be banned, Sebastian Gorka was saying that Fuentes should have his verified status revoked by Twitter because he disliked his political views. These people are openly embracing tech censorship, which is something that even the most mainstream of people in the Republican Party are not supportive of.

But trying to make an example out of Malkin has been a huge mistake by these shills. She’s been a major figure within mainstream establishment circles for several decades. Claiming that she should be silenced and banned for refusing to denounce Fuentes is only going to create more resentment towards fake conservative incorporated.

]]> Groyper Supreme Commander Nick Fuentes Gets Viciously Smeared on the Top of Drudge! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/18/groyper-supreme-commander-nick-fuentes-gets-viciously-smeared-on-the-front-of-drudge/ Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 18, 2019

This is called “painting a target on someone’s back.”

On Sunday, Our Young Hero Nick Fuentes was featured on the Drudge Report front page.

Right underneath the top line, which was some silly nonsense about the stupid impeachment thing that no one cares about.

Right there: his face.

The face of the protagonist, the face of the little Mexican boy who came to save America from the Jews.

You should have seen my face.

As is the way of the Drudge – which, let me remind you, is a Jewish publication – there were two links below the face of our hero.

The first was from The Hill.

And what did it say?

Nothing good, I can tell you that.

The Hill:

A fringe group of far-right activists have been disrupting conservative and pro-Trump events in recent weeks, drawing rebukes from mainstream Republicans who are eager to separate the party from white nationalists and alt-right racists.

Count those trigger words in that lede, nigger.

You’re gonna have to count them, for serious, because I can’t count that high.

A small but vocal group of young men led by 21-year-old broadcaster Nicholas Fuentes received national attention this week after heckling Donald Trump Jr. at an event in California, where he was promoting his new book “Triggered.”

Fuentes and others on the far right have been publishing calendars of events held by Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, conservative media stars Ben Shapiro and David Rubin and others, including Trump Jr. and Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), in an effort to have their followers infiltrate and disrupt the events.

“Infiltrate and disrupt” is a codeword for “go to the events and ask questions at the Q&A.”

But wait – here’s a non-defamatory sentence.

The alt-right activists view Kirk and Shapiro as insufficiently conservative on issues like immigration and claim to be carrying the mantle for President Trump. Members often show up at the events wearing red Make America Great Again hats and Fuentes’s show is called “America First” in a nod to the president’s popular slogan.

Shapiro, who is Jewish, and others have described the disruptions as an insidious effort to smuggle racist and anti-Semitic ideologies into the conservative mainstream.

At a speech at Stanford University this week, Shapiro lashed out at Fuentes, calling him a “garbage human being” whose views are “obviously white supremacist garbage.”

Shapiro did not call out Fuentes by name, as he and others are worried that fighting back will elevate the fringe group and give them more attention than they deserve.

But it was clear that Shapiro was directing his fire at Fuentes, whom he characterized as the leader of the next wave of the alt-right movement.

“Some call themselves ‘America First’ to hijack President Trump’s slogans to give themselves a patina of credibility … you’re seeing them adopt the beliefs of some of these other movements in order to find cover for their own vile belief system,” Shapiro said.

Fuentes’s followers are called “Groypers” and identify themselves with the image of a fat, green frog, who looks similar to the original alt-right “Pepe” character.

IT’S A TOAD, BITCH!

Fuentes’s YouTube show has been a factory for bigoted, anti-Semitic and racist content.

The 21-year old attended the “Unite the Right” white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, and later posted on his Facebook page: “The ruthless transnational elite know a tidal wave of white identity is coming and know that once the word gets out they will not be able to stop us. The fire rises.”

Fuentes has lashed out at Rubin, the conservative YouTube star, who is Jewish and gay.

“You want to talk to Jewy Jewstein?,” Fuentes said. “I’m David Rubin and this is the gay Jewish show. Today we’ve got a Jew.”

And in another anti-Semitic segment, Fuentes questioned whether the Holocaust took place, while likening the burning bodies of Jews to cookies baking in an oven.

That’s when the fire REALLY rises – when you stack bodies 20 high and burn them in the open air in a field using wood.

But seriously… why is this article talking about this? It is a new article about how there is a group of young conservatives who are dissatisfied with the establishment, or is it an examination of thousands of hours of Nick Fuentes content in search of the naughty words?

In an interview with The Hill, Fuentes insisted that he is not racist, anti-Semitic or a white nationalist. Fuentes said he believes that the Holocaust did take place and that the “cookies” bit was said for shock value.

“I’ve never advocated for a white ethno-state,” Fuentes said. “Multiracialism is here and we have to live with it and [the question is] how will we do that?”

Fuentes said that in hindsight, he probably would not have gone to the Charlottesville rally if he had known it would be co-opted by David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a white supremacist and neo-Nazi.

He said that some of his remarks are meant as outrage trolling to draw attention to his show or as over-the-top digs at political rivals aimed at getting under their skin.

“That’s kind of the whole thing,” he said. “We have figured out the game. The algorithm. We’ve hacked the conversation where if you say sensational things like we do, you get attention. I don’t want it to be like that. I wish I could ascend with ideas.”

To the surprise of some longtime conservative media figures, Fuentes’s cause has found an ally in Michelle Malkin, the former Fox News contributor. Malkin did not return a request for comment.

But for the most part, conservative media has been sounding the alarm about the need for the party to banish Fuentes and his followers.

BANISH!

What does it mean???

Will they run him out of town on a rail???

We are an army! Look at our numbers!

“[Fuentes] and his followers are scum of the earth and their bad faith, anti-Semitic attacks should be shot down by the entire conservative movement,” Republican strategist Caleb Hull said on Twitter.

The Trump Jr. protests received media attention for what many viewed as a delicious irony — the president’s son being shouted down by right-wing protesters, although the story changed once it became clear that these were not mainstream conservatives.

Fuentes said that he has no issues with Trump Jr., but rather that he’s trying to get the president and his family to see Kirk as a conservative fraud.

And then catch this: The Hill totally reframes the Crenshaw threat to dox and ruin the lives of the Groypers, getting a quote from him saying he “felt sorry” for them.

After the “Groypers” confronted Crenshaw at a public event in Arizona, the congressman said that he felt sorry for the young protesters.

Crenshaw predicted they would grow up to regret having been captured forever on video and revealed as racists.

“This is the alt right 2.0 because the alt right was discredited,” Crenshaw said. “So what they do is try to cloak themselves in some logical nationalism or MAGA-hat wearing America First rhetoric, which a lot of conservatives agree with, and then they use that to cloak their anti-Semitic leanings, and their racist leanings, and it’s pretty gross. You’re going to regret this.”

That is not what happened.

We have video of what happened.

These boys were saying that they disagreed with sending all of these billions to Israel, and Crenshaw said “you’ll regret this.”

It’s on video!

You can’t fool us, The Hill!

We know what he meant! That was a threat by a sitting Congressman against college kids who disagree with American foreign policy!

None of this has anything to do with “racism”!

It’s a hoax!

The Other Article Drudge Linked

The second article at the top of Drudge next to Nick Fuentes’ face was from The Washington Post.

It was basically the same exactly thing. Except maybe it wasn’t quite as bad as The Hill version. Though it had all the same slurs.

From it:

At stake, analysts say, is how President Donald Trump’s youngest voters define Trumpism. Will they embrace white nationalism and similar far-right causes – or reject them?

“Part of this is an internecine war within conservatism,” said Nicole Hemmer, a Columbia University scholar and author of “Messengers of the Right,” a 2016 book on conservative media. “Who is the true follower of Donald Trump? That’s the fight you’re seeing.”

Fuentes, a Boston University dropout who lives in the Chicago suburbs, has emerged as a champion of those on the right who believe mainstream conservatism – in their words, “Conservative Inc.” – has gone astray. He attended the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, but denies he is a neo-Nazi or a white nationalist.

On his “America First” YouTube show, Fuentes espouses “demographic realism.” That means he takes the hardest line possible against immigration: “We’re slamming the door so hard that people’s faces are shattering,” Fuentes says. He also expresses fear about what will happen to America as its population becomes much less white – “dramatic and radical change,” he says, “that will come with not insignificant consequences and not all of them good.”

That is a good, fair quote, I think. It’s surrounded by all the slurs and defamation, but it is a good quote by itself.

Fuentes on his Internet show denounces same-sex marriage and “transgenderism” as “deviancy,” and he questions U.S. foreign aid to Israel. In January, Fuentes likened the Holocaust to a cookie-baking operation led by the Cookie Monster in a video monologue that implied he questions the death toll of 6 million Jews.

…

Fuentes said he is Catholic and that his ethnic background includes Mexican heritage through his father’s ancestors. In a video after the August shootings in El Paso, Texas, that left 22 dead, including Mexicans and Mexican-Americans, Fuentes declared: “The easiest way for Mexicans to not get shot and killed in Walmart is for them to not [expletive] be here.”

Asked about that statement and others, Fuentes said in an email: “I don’t feel compelled to explain every ‘shocking’ phrase I’ve uttered in the over 1,000 hours of content I’ve produced in the span of four years. It’s kind of missing the point.”

His show’s audience, Fuentes said, is “zoomers,” those born after the mid-1990s in what is known as “Generation Z.”

…

Reveling in the attention he has received lately, Fuentes cheers those who call themselves “Groypers” – the name of a far-right meme based on a cartoon toad – and troll prominent conservatives. Shapiro is one target. Another is Charlie Kirk, founder of the conservative student network Turning Point USA, who moderated the Nov. 10 event at UCLA with Trump Jr.

Turning Point declined to comment on Fuentes.

Kirk wrote Thursday on Twitter: “Ethno-nationalism is Un-American. It has NO place in the conservative movement.” Trump Jr. retweeted another Kirk statement denouncing white supremacists who came to a Turning Point event.

Fuentes said he supports the president and Trump Jr. but not Kirk.

…

Thomas Main, a professor of public and international affairs at Baruch College and author of a book on the alt-right, said the vocabulary of such fringe movements is in constant flux.

Participants tend to “put everything ironically and knowingly,” he said, “so the outsiders have difficulty knowing what’s going on.” But those participants also crave attention, especially on college campuses. When they get noticed, Main said, they say to themselves: “Hey, if I’m outraging everybody, I must be doing something right.”

Yeah, if your enemies are outraged, you’re doing something right.

How could that be controversial?

Hey King, Keep Your Head Up

Nick:

As you know, you are now way past Charlie Kirk and his people coming at you.

The entire establishment – both left and right – is now on you, and is going to do everything they can to destroy you.

This right now is them painting a target on your back. This is “Get Fuentes.”

The whole world is about to come down on you, like nothing you can even begin to imagine.

They are going to go after every member of your family. Not just your immediately family, but your extended family. They are going to stalk basically everyone you know. They will use journalists to do this, but it will be purely for intimidation purposes.

They will park cars outside of the homes of your family members. They will come up on property and look into windows. And there isn’t really anything you can do about it.

So, get ready.

Tell your family. Your whole family. And anyone else you know. They’re also going to go through everyone you knew in high school, and they will find people to lie about you.

So I mean. Just get ready for that. It is coming right now. And it is going to be emotionally difficult, even with your particular disposition.

But God will help you through it, and I’ve no doubt you’ll manage.

All it means is that you’re winning.

]]>