They voted, they protested, but nothing worked

So… 91% voted against the migrants.

And they’re getting them anyway?

Democracy just means “anal sex.” It doesn’t have anything to do with voting, per se. Voting is a part of the marketing campaign. They’re not obligated to do things that you voted for in a democracy, if ever you vote against the democracy agenda.

Remix:

Germans keep voting against migrants in various referendums in the northeastern state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, but elected leaders in the state have consistently responded by vowing to bring migrants into their towns and cities anyway. In the latest case, an overwhelming 91.4 percent of Germans living in Grevesmühle voted in a referendum against a container village, but the mayor says that he will push to move in migrant tents despite the vote.

The vote, which was held on Sunday, now requires the town of 10,000 to ensure that no container villages are built on urban land, and renting or selling city-owned areas for this purpose is also prohibited. The city administration announced this result after all the votes were counted on Sunday evening and posted to the city’s website.

The referendum occurred after the city council in April offered two areas owned by the district to accommodate “refugees.” Residents organized a referendum to fight back against the proposal. The vote saw 46.5 percent of voters head to the polls, which passed the minimum requirement of 25 percent.

Despite the commanding majority vote against migrants, Grevesmühlen Mayor Lars Prahler (independent) said that private land is not affected by the vote and the vote only applies to container accommodations. He says that the city can still continue to host migrants in permanent building structures, such as sports halls.

The mayor, Lars Prahler

He also added that the city will explore the option of erecting tents for the migrants and that the referendum is only binding for two years.

As Remix News has previously reported, other cities and towns in the same German state have consistently voted against migrant accommodations. For example, in the larger city of Greifswald, 65 percent of residents voted against a container village there. However, the Green party mayor, Stefan Fassbinder, rejected the results and said migrants would be coming anyway. He insisted the vote would not affect the local government’s pro-migration agenda, but would make the decision on where to house newcomers more challenging.

“In the near future, we will have to make even greater efforts to get into the debate, to enter into dialogue with the citizens, with the economy, with everyone else, so that immigration can be successful,” Fassbinder said after the vote. He added: “The refugees will come. The only question is where will they be housed.”

Basically, they pretended like voting mattered – just as long as they could use the media and the academic system to sway you into voting for what they wanted.

The mask is off now, and there is not even a pretext that the popular will matters.

We are living under a tyranny.

Why do these people insist on being oppressed?

German sounds so boring when it’s not a Hitler speech or a heavy metal song

You know what they say about NIGGER RAPE: women deserve it.

No, wait – that’s not what they say!

What do they say…?

The more the merrier?

I guess?

Remix:

The German city of Greifswald overwhelmingly rejected plans to accommodate more migrants in the area in a referendum held on Sunday.

Local residents voted with a 65 percent majority against a proposal to lease land to the Vorpommern-Greifswald district “for the purpose of building container villages to accommodate refugees.”

A total of 21,000 eligible voters turned out, surpassing the minimum threshold of 25 percent of the 47,410-strong electorate, making the decision binding on local government for two years.

Despite the clear rejection of resettling more migrants in the area, Green Party mayor, Stefan Fassbinder, remained undeterred in his ambitions to welcome greater numbers of new arrivals. He insisted the vote would not affect the local government’s pro-migration agenda, but would make the decision on where to house newcomers more challenging.

Stefan Fassbinder, Green party mayor

“In the near future we will have to make even greater efforts to get into the debate, to enter into dialogue with the citizens, with the economy, with everyone else, so that immigration can be successful,” Fassbinder said after the vote.

Loopholes could be exploited that may result in container villages being built in other areas nearby and the local government is exploring viable locations.

This is despite the huge resistance to the plans evident among the local community. Residents congregated upon hearing the initial plans to relocate migrants to the area and organized a citizens’ initiative to prevent the construction of container villages in urban areas in general. The initiative collected more than 7,000 signatures in a fortnight, forcing the hand of local officials to hold a referendum on the matter.

Protesting didn’t work either

Even ahead of the referendum, Fassbinder remained adamant that local officials would get their way, telling journalists, “The refugees will come. The only question is where will they be housed.”

There is no ability to push back on anything.

These people are going to do whatever they want, and you just have to take it.

In democracy, there is no possibility of the people having a say in anything that happens.

And with women in public, the majority of people probably support whatever the Jews tell them to support anyway.