This is not just the standard European protest about the global warmers’ plan to shut down all farming in Europe.

The Poles are also protesting the Ukraine pushing food into their country and disrupting the market. And one has to imagine, even if it’s not being stated in the English media, a lot of the people are protesting the millions of Ukrainian refugees in their country, who are Ukrainizing them.

This is one to watch.

Especially given that the violence is escalating.

Fighting the cops is generally pointless, but there’s a point at which “fighting the cops” turns into “raiding police station weapons depots” and “storming government buildings.” And that is the point at which a protest becomes interesting.

These Poles are already trying to get into the Parliament, so that means the next step is the cops using live rounds to keep them out. That doesn’t usually work, by the way. Usually, shooting protesters just makes the mob much angrier.

Fox News:

Poland saw its most violent protest by farmers and supporters yet Wednesday as some participants threw stones at police and tried to push through barriers around parliament, injuring several officers, police said.

Police said they detained over a dozen people and prevented the protesters from getting through to the Sejm, the Polish parliament.

Farmers are angry over European Union climate policies and food imports from Ukraine that they say threaten their livelihoods. Such protests have occurred across the 27-member EU in recent weeks, but this one was decidedly angrier than earlier demonstrations in the central European nation.

The Poles have a lot of reasons to be angry.

Aside from the above mentioned issues, the speed at which America has dragged them down from “conservative Catholic country” to “anal ram zone” is astonishing. It’s actually faster than what happened in Ireland.

Police noted on the social media platform X that its officers “are not a party to the ongoing dispute” and warned that behavior threatening their safety “cannot be taken lightly and requires a firm and decisive response.”

The deputy agriculture minister, Michał Kołodziejczak, said he didn’t believe that “real, normal farmers caused a riot in front of the Sejm today,” and that it was necessary to isolate “provocateurs and troublemakers.”

He did not say who he thought was behind the violence.

Well, whoever they were, there sure were a lot of them.

And they were really mad.

You love to see it.

Farmers on tractors blocked highways leading into Warsaw while thousands of their supporters gathered in front of the prime minister’s office before marching to the parliament. Some trampled a European Union flag and burned a mock coffin bearing the word “farmer.”

Farmers were joined by miners, foresters, hunters and other supporters. They blew horns and set off firecrackers and smoke bombs, despite police warnings that the use of pyrotechnics was banned. Some protesters burned tires.

The protesters are demanding a withdrawal from the EU’s Green Deal, a plan meant to fight climate change and protect biodiversity, including with plans requiring farmers to reduce the excessive use of polluting chemicals to boost their crops.

The protests have led politicians to water down some provisions.

The protesters also want the Polish-Ukrainian border closed to stop the imports of Ukrainian food products, which farmers say drive down market prices and put Poland’s agricultural sector in jeopardy.

…

Anti-Ukrainian slogans have featured at the protests in Poland, where authorities have said they are concerned that Russia is trying to leverage legitimate concerns to create divisions between Warsaw and Kyiv.

There are probably over 10 million Ukrainians in Poland, or more than 20% of the population. There are large cities in the South that are now a majority Ukrainian. Ukrainian migrants behave about as well Venezuelan migrants.

This is beyond a “legitimate concern,” it’s an existential crisis.

The Polish government are the biggest supporters of the Ukraine, and believe the most important thing in the universe is destroying Russia by any means necessary.

Most Poles appear to be realizing that there are more important things in life than revenge for stuff Stalin allegedly did 100 years ago.

🇵🇱🚜‼️ Poland has fallen.#ProtestRolnikow #AgriculteurEnColere #FarmersProtest pic.twitter.com/QVsIdsU1rQ

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 6, 2024

With all of these gross brown people dropping out, it’s unclear where Bernie is going to stand in another few weeks.

Probably, he’ll be in third, like he always is. But who knows. He could break out. It’s kind of unclear what is going to happen next, other than that any candidate is on track to lose against Trump.

At least he’ll fix your internet.

CNBC:

Bernie Sanders unveiled a plan Friday to expand broadband internet access as part of a push to boost the economy and reduce corporate power over Americans.

In his sprawling “High-Speed Internet for All” proposal, the Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate calls to treat internet like a public utility. His campaign argues that the internet should not be a “price gouging profit machine” for companies such as Comcast, AT&T and Verizon.

Sanders’ plan would create $150 billion in grants and aid for local and state governments to build publicly owned broadband networks as part of the Green New Deal infrastructure initiative. The total would mark a massive increase over current funding for broadband development initiatives. The proposal would also break up what the campaign calls “internet service provider and cable monopolies,” stop service providers from offering content and end what it calls “anticompetitive mergers.”

Sanders and his rivals for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination have pushed to boost high-speed internet access for rural and low-income Americans, saying it has become a necessity to succeed in school and business. The self-proclaimed democratic socialist has unveiled numerous plans to root out corporate influence as he runs near the top of a jammed primary field.

“Access to the internet is a necessity in today’s economy, and it should be available for all. We are going to take on the greedy internet, telecom, and cable monopolies and put an end to their absurd prices gauging,” Sanders said in a statement.

The plan would also require service providers to offer a “basic” broadband plan at an “affordable price.” In addition, it would put $7.5 billion toward high-speed broadband in Native American communities and ensure that public housing residents have access to free broadband.

It’s probably important to remember that the Green New Deal is now a long term plan that these people are going to be talking about forever. And it is being advertised as a fix-all for everything. In actual fact, on paper, it is a communist-type complete takeover of the US economy.

However, when it is finally implemented after the Democrats win in 2024, it will not be the communism you foresaw. It will not be a Stalinist collectivization where the rich have their wealth stolen from them to pay for poor people to live in collectivized bloc housing, and outer provinces of brown people are forced into slavery to provide food for the blocs.

It will simply be a gigantic operation of the government colluding with multinationals like Amazon and Google to completely take over your life even more than those parties already have.

And it’s not going to look like the Chinese version of that, where the government runs the corporations and everything is used for increasing the general well-being and wealth of the population by bolstering a middle class.

It is going to be brutal, multicultural, and Jewish.

You are going to be forced to live in a pod and eat bugs, and your every action will be watched by cameras and your behavior patterns will be monitored and regulated by AI systems.

It is funny to see them coming out and saying that literally everything – including something so simple and necessary as fixing the internet access problem in America – will be part of this scheme that is ostensibly about Global Warming. It’s basically a brazen admission that Global Warming is simply an excuse for a massive transformation of society into a bug-eating, pod-based one.

Eventually, they plan to implant microchips into your brains.

The best we can do is hope that our pods are as orderly and clean as those of Tokyo.

And that our bugs are served to us fried, instead of made into some kind of weird paste.

The last thing I want is for Miami to sink.

In fact, I want Miami to rise and conquer the earth – with me as CYBORG KING OF MIAMI.

Daily Mail:

Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez predicts that Miami will not exist ‘in a few years’ if the Green New Deal is not passed.

The New York representative, 29, made her chilling warning about the effects of climate change at the NAACP forum on Wednesday.

‘What is not realistic is not responding with a solution on the scale of the crisis — because what’s not realistic is Miami not existing in a few years,’ she said.

Ocasio-Cortez reiterated that we need to be ‘realistic’ about the problem and make changes immediately.

She revealed the Green New Deal proposal in February, which focused on changing the economy, renewable energy alternatives and resource efficiency.

In August she also said if glaciers melt they could release ‘prehistoric diseases… killing humans.’

She added: ‘There are a lot of diseases that are frozen in some of these glaciers that scientists fear that there is a potential that a lot of diseases could escape these melted glaciers.’

This is incredibly serious.

The last thing we need is a sunken Miami, prehistoric diseases…

Why again is AOC not allowed to run for president in 2020?

Oh right – racism.

We are all doomed.

Let us hope that instead of Miami sinking, everything else sinks and Miami rises – with me as the CYBORG KING.

And I will be protected by my cyborg female death ninjas who I pay with cocaine and access to my invincible cyborg penis.

Everyone will bow before me and my empire of Aryan Miami… or they will pay the ultimate price.

Which is being chopped up by ninja cyborgs with laser swords.

But probably they will already have drowned anyway because of weather changing from people driving cars or whatever.

Blacks in Chicago have slowed their incredible murder agenda slightly in the early months of 2019.

CNN:

Homicides and shootings are on the decline in Chicago this year, police said Friday.

There have been 44 homicides to date, compared with 80 by this time last year, or a 44% decrease, Chicago police said in a statement. There have been 214 shootings so far in January and February, they said, compared with 282 in the first two months of last year. The number of shooting victims also has declined, with 253 in 2019, compared with 345 last year, police said.

February saw a 40% decline in homicides and a 7% reduction in shootings, compared with the same time period last year, officials said.

I’m sure there’s a whole lot of back-slapping going on, but in actual reality, everyone knows that this was the result of the friendly Polar Vortex, which created record low temperatures in Chicago this year.

One thing about black people is that they originate in the jungles of Africa. This means that they are not especially adapted to cold weather.

This means that if it was a Polar Vortex 365 days a year, blacks would only kill half of the people they kill normally.

This Green New Deal is looking better and better by the minute.

Maybe shutting down electricity and freezing the planet by stopping people from driving cars really is the solution we’ve all been waiting for.

I am at heart much more of a Kaczynskite than a neon-nazi in the first place, so the whole Amishification thing appeals to me fundamentally.

Aside from turning off all technology and working in fields with horses, I am also excited about starting a Jewish-type bearded mafia-style ethnocentric ingroup with my frens.

Furthermore, Amish women are the only women this side of Saudi Arabia who are not completely unredeemable whores.

Stopping black crime is just the cherry on top.

Actually, the cherry on top is that blacks will all just die in the cold when AOC shuts off their electricity.

Literally, we’re talking a couple days after Alexandria flips the switch and shuts off whatever power plant powers Chicago, and they’re all going to be completely and totally dead.

The Green New Deal is actually genocidal.

How could anyone oppose it?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thinks children with difficult lives would be better off not existing.

Daily Wire:

Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) suggested on Sunday night that people should consider not having children due to climate change because there is a “scientific consensus” that life will be hard for kids.

“Our planet is going to hit disaster if we don’t turn this ship around and so it’s basically like, there’s a scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult,” Ocasio-Cortez said while chopping up food in her kitchen during an Instagram live video. “And it does lead, I think, young people to have a legitimate question, you know, ‘Is it okay to still have children?'”

Here’s the video:

Socialist @AOC discusses how people should reconsider having children due to global warming, and reminds us that we are all going to *literally* die if the Green New Deal doesn’t pass. She also takes some shots at Dianne Feinstein. *Sidenote: She failed to compost her potatoes* pic.twitter.com/6eWhbTbqqB

— Gob Abierto (@GobAbiertoBOL) February 25, 2019

There’s a couple of things to unpack here.

If people shouldn’t reproduce then what is the point of even trying to fix the world? Alexandria says because “there are already children in the world.” But if there are already children in the world and she wants to use her Green New Deal or whatever to save them from the Climate Apocalypse, why not reproduce anyway since the world would be a better place?

Despite the climate fearmongers’ claims and according to what we know about history, we live in the best moment to have kids.

There’s never a perfect time for having kids. But is there a perfect time for anything?

All people born in this world all throughout history had to face the challenges of their time. Our forefathers had theirs, we have ours, and our children and grandchildren will have theirs.

There was never a perfect dreamlike moment to reproduce, because reproduction is survival and survival is not something you do when the time is right.

Survival is something you do all the time, whatever it takes.

A great man once said:

“Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.”

People now enjoy all kinds of benefits that our ancestors didn’t have. Education, medicine, accumulated knowledge, technology, infrastructure, and everything that can be seen all around. If with all of these things we now enjoy people believe that they shouldn’t reproduce because the lives of their kids may be difficult… then what does that say about our people?

Our ancestors managed to get us here and they achieved that in conditions most people would deem nightmarish. We have it easier now.

We owe it to them to do our part and honor their sacrifice.

Embrace struggle.

Hail Victory.

This is how @SenFeinstein reacted to children asking her to support the #GreenNewDeal resolution — with smugness + disrespect.

This is a fight for our generation's survival. Her reaction is why young people desperately want new leadership in Congress. pic.twitter.com/0zAkaxruMI

— Sunrise Movement 🌅 (@sunrisemvmt) February 22, 2019

Holy shit, this is my new favorite video ever.

I am really starting to take kindly to the total collapse of any form of coherence in Western society, to the point where I’m beginning to wonder if the machine in the sky hasn’t created this nightmare for my personal amusement.

A group of school children went to Diane Feinstein’s office in San Francisco and started demanding that she back Ocasio-Cortez’ “Green New Deal,” which calls for banning most electricity, most home heating and all airplane travel by 2030.

They had some stupid woman in her 20s leading them, and the kids were all whining about how they’re going to be living under water in a few years if we don’t shut everything down right now and start living like the Amish.

The grizzled old Jewish rat Feinstein, who is responsible for flooding America with 75-IQ lunatics like Ocasio-Cortez in the first place, had a meltdown on the whiny little brainwashed brats and told them: “I’ve been doing this for 30 years, I know what I’m doing.”

“You come in here and say ‘it has to be my way or the highway’ and I don’t respond to that,” Feinstein said, sneering at the goyim.

This country has become completely unworkable. Most people do not even believe manmade global warming is real, let alone that cities are going to be flooded in 10 years, let alone that the solution is to cut off the electricity in America and let people live like the Amish.

I’m personally not even against going full-Amish.

But these angry lunatics are not even admitting that their plan is an Amish transformation. The literal claim by Ocasio and her people is that we will invent new technologies in the next ten years that will power houses and vehicles as we shut off the electricity being generated by fossil fuel and nuclear power (they are trying to cut nuclear power even though it doesn’t release CO2, no one knows why).

I have never in my life heard of a policy that requires destroying crucial infrastructure based on the theory that it will be replaced with technology that hasn’t been invented yet.

And obviously, not even the Jews can go along with this. Ocasio and her people are ready to start shutting off power plants right now and then tell their teams of affirmative action multicultural scientists that they better hurry up and invent new power sources because people are sitting in the dark freezing to death.

It’s just wow.

What a complete disaster.

Not as big of a disaster as Alexandria’s posture though.

That’s the worst disaster I’ve seen at least since all those niggers drowned in Katrina.

Hit me up for a shoulder exercise routine, babe. Plus, I’ll write the “how to live like the Amish” section of your Green New Deal, which will hopefully keep some white people from freezing to death.

All the brown people in the north of the country are going to freeze to death either way once we go full-Amish, which is one of the reasons I support this plan.

A real and serious “Green New Deal” would involve a major investment in nuclear power.

This week several Democrats unveiled a “Green New Deal” to solve a problem that does not actually exist. They are proposing a complete restructuring of our society to fight “climate change.” They’ve bought into an unproven theory that the emission of fossil fuels into the atmosphere is causing changes in the weather. These changes in the weather they say will result in an environmental apocalypse causing the death of every living thing on the planet.

These are just some of the things that they want to complete by 2030 as part of this “Green New Deal“:

• Rebuild or revamp every building in the country to be energy efficient
• Phase out nuclear energy
• Replace all air travel with high speed trains
• End all traditional forms of energy production
• Invent new “green” technologies to provide energy

Obviously, such a plan would be entirely impractical to implement. It reveals that these people are living in a fantasy world and are incapable of dealing with practical realities. They are indulging in emotionally driven fantasies thinking that the entire country can run off of solar energy and windmill farms.

But let’s suspend disbelief for a moment and accept their view of the world. If fossil fuel emissions into the atmosphere were legitimately going to result in the destruction of the planet, they should be demanding the immediate expansion of nuclear power.

Nuclear power is a proven energy source and its use has dramatically eliminated the burning of fossil fuels.

Wikipedia:

Nuclear power is classified as a low greenhouse gas energy supply technology, along with renewable energy, by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.[7] Since its commercialization in the 1970s, nuclear power has prevented about 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and the emission of about 64 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent that would have otherwise resulted from the burning of fossil fuels.[8]

Yes, nuclear power generates toxic waste that has to be dealt with. But dealing with toxic waste would be a far more preferable option than having the entire planet destroyed from fossil fuel emissions. Even if this resulted in situations like the “toxic waste” scene in RoboCop, it would still be a better alternative than an environmental apocalypse.

The fact that their “Green New Deal” actually advocates for the elimination of nuclear power is proof of how stupid their plan is. They openly state their opposition to the most efficient source of energy that does not emit fossil fuels.

Expanding nuclear power would at least reduce fossil fuel emissions and buy us time for new energy solutions to be developed. There’s a good chance that we’ll see a breakthrough in nuclear fusion technology at some point in the 21st century. That would give us nuclear power without the toxic waste generated from fission reactions. But until such a breakthrough happens, why not build more fission plants?

Whatever the case, climate change is an enormous hoax designed to convince White people to pay more taxes for the good of the planet. It becomes an even more apparent hoax when the people who believe in it the most refuse to endorse the most practical solution to this fake problem.

It’s funny.

When Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez first came out and said she was going to cut all fossil fuels by 2030, the media was all cheering her on.

Now, that her people have come out and said that actually they’re not going to cut them all, the media is being more critical, with some saying that the plan is insane. On Thursday, WaPo ran an op-ed entitled “‘We’re nuts!’ isn’t a great pitch for a Green New Deal.”

The plan was published by NPR on Thursday, and does appear to say that they want zero fossil fuels in just over ten years, even though they’re claiming they aren’t going to go that far.

Basically, what they are talking about is either:

1. A plan of full deindustrialization, a removal of most or all electricity, and basically a return of civilization to an agrarian state, or
2. Completely insane

I’m not even necessarily against the second thing in some philosophical sense, but I’m pretty sure if we did that we would be invaded by another country.

The technology thing is genuinely a difficult question, as the direction technology is currently taking us in appears to be certainly very bad. When Amazon starts releasing consumer versions of a neural interface device in 15 years, what exactly happens to our society? People are glued to their phones now – what is going to happen when they can do video games and porn in a virtual reality simulation that is just as real or even more real than reality?

It’s a problem.

Anyway, this isn’t actually the thing that AOC is talking about – she is promoting something that is legitimately insane, or at least so stupid that you would have to be a literal drooling retard to believe it.

I don’t know if she is insane, retarded or just lying.

But I do know that any non-retard/insane 5-year-old can understand that if 83% of our energy comes from “non-renewable” resources, and you’re talking about removing all of those, then you’re talking about cutting out the overwhelming majority of electricity.

It isn’t physically possible to build enough of these goddamn disgusting windmills to make up for all of that lost energy. And there are not places to build too many more hydroelectric dams.

Solar power doesn’t really work, because there is nowhere to store it, and even if it did work there wouldn’t be enough space to put enough solar panels to power the entire US.

The one option is increasing nuclear power, which doesn’t release carbon dioxide, but they’re against that too.

What they are calling for – not in this paper specifically, but in their public statements – is for people to rush to invent new technologies, now, before their plan goes into full effect.

That is completely insane. There is no other way to describe presenting a ten year plan that requires the invention of new technologies.

There is no single element of this that makes any sense.

Here’s the craziest part of the report:

92% of Democrats and 64% of Republicans.

Is it true that these high numbers of people support this?

Probably not. I assume not. I hope not.

I think what they did was some rigged polling. Or people just don’t know what this is.

I’m not sure. But this is one of the nuttiest phenomenon I’ve ever witnessed. A type of collective madness is happening surrounding this global warming issue.

I don’t really believe that carbon causes warming, but maybe it does. Who knows. Climatology is not a real science, so you can’t really know, because all of these people are just paid shills working for the UN and getting rich.

So maybe it is real and they’ve just radically exaggerated it for whatever reason.

I’m willing to go with that. Whatever.

As I’ve already said over and over again, if this is real and it is going to lead to an apocalypse, we are going to have to go with nuclear power. We don’t have any other choice.

Furthermore, why are we not making an issue of deforestation, if this is the thing? You know that plants breath carbon dioxide and emit oxygen. It’s a part of photosynthesis, which you learn about in third grade, yet none of these people are talking about the role that plantlife could play in reducing carbon in the atmosphere.

Why are we allowing third world people to clearcut rainforests?

These people destroy ancient forests with slash and burn farming. That means they cut the trees and set them on fire, and the nutrients from the burned trees create extra fertile soil for a few seasons before the land becomes virtually untillable due to due to rapid soil erosion which happens due to the nature of the thing (rainforests hold all of the topsoil in a root system and when you destroy that it just washes away).

Why doesn’t the UN do something about this?

It’s not only that they’re not doing anything – they’re not even talking about it.

You would think this would be important.

I remember when I was a kid, rainforests were referred to as “the world’s lungs.” But when you Google that now, you don’t get any recent results.

The only thing that the UN is talking about and doing is forcing deindustrialization of white countries.

This just again speaks to how dishonest and agenda-driven this whole program is. It is simply an attack on white countries. It has nothing at all to do with stopping a doomsday scenario.

The media is pushing back against this “Green New Deal” a bit, yes. But they are going to reformulate this and come back with it, and it is going to be a major issue in the 2020 election.

You would think people would have more important things to worry about, but this has become a type of religion.

If politics was the rap music scene, Nancy Pelosi would be Nicki Minaj and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would be Cardi B.

Do you see the analogy?

Our favorite rational centrist columnist Chris Cillizza writes for CNN:

Thursday is a big day for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The New York freshman Democrat, who has rapidly become one of the biggest stars in her party, will formally introduce her much-touted “Green New Deal” — a package of legislation aimed at, among other things, addressing the threat posed by climate change.

Nancy Pelosi isn’t all that impressed. Asked about the “Green New Deal” in an interview with Politico on Wednesday, Pelosi dropped this amazing bit of shade on it:

“It will be one of several or maybe many suggestions that we receive. The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they’re for it, right?”

I mean.

Pelosi knows exactly what she’s doing here. Her utter dismissiveness of the “Green New Deal” — and, by extension, AOC, who is the member most closely identified with it, is entirely intentional.

Pelosi knows that AOC is a rising national power — particularly among the most activist and liberal left. Given Ocasio-Cortez’s profile — and her influence among young, liberal members — Pelosi knows she can’t just ignore what the New York Democrat says and does. But she isn’t going to kowtow to AOC either.

Earlier this year, Ocasio-Cortez was passed over for a spot on the powerful Ways and Means Committee despite the fact that Joe Crowley, who she beat in a primary last summer, had a seat on Ways and Means. That decision didn’t come by accident — and it didn’t come without Pelosi knowing about it and likely directing it.

On climate, in particular, Pelosi’s umbrage about the “Green New Deal” — and AOC — is likely rooted in the fact that the California Democrat has long been a leading voice on global warming and climate change issues. (She referred to it as her “flagship” issue in the Politico interview.)

The idea that because Ocasio-Cortez has lent her name and support to the “Green New Deal,” then Pelosi has to suddenly change her legislative plans on how to address climate change, is anathema to Pelosi. (One wonders whether AOC’s decision to participate in a sit-in at Pelosi’s office during new member orientation late last year to draw attention to the “Green New Deal” didn’t sit too well with the speaker either.)

Yeah.

I mean.

I guess.

I would assume there is some kind of power struggle there. Women always have power struggles in the workplace. They are obsessed with it. And this is also a racial struggle. Pelosi lobbied her entire career to have white people replaced with brown people, but I guess she expected to retire before this program was forced on her.

Then it showed up in her office.

Nancy might not be thinking of it in terms of a racial struggle (I’m sure AOC is), but let’s be real: if AOC was white, she wouldn’t be saying all this ultra-insane stuff and having it celebrated as genius. I’m not going to say that a white bitch couldn’t be this dumb, but the media wouldn’t back up a white bitch that was saying stuff this dumb.

However, I can believe that Nancy doesn’t know what the green deal/dream is. Does anyone know what it is? I’ve been trying to figure it out and no one knows. She’s saying end fossil fuel by 2030, which would require us to either invent some kind of science fiction type energy source basically in the next few months, or just shut down 95+% of our energy consumption.

Now they’re saying they didn’t really mean “all fossil fuel.” But they only started saying that in the last couple days – people were pointing out how insane it was for over a week.

I don’t think that this is something that anyone is obligated to take seriously.

Also: isn’t “nobody knows what it is, but they’re for it, right?” a bit of self-deprecating humor referencing what she said about Obamacare way back when?

I’m getting nostalgic for Nancy Pelosi, and she hasn’t even been officially race-replaced yet.

We are all going to live to see a time when we remember the good old days of Nancy Pelosi. A time when brown people are forcing us to ride bicycles from New York to LA for business meetings.

You will have no choice but to take traveling jobs, since you will pay 98.3% of our income in taxes to support a global welfare state with roughly 6 billion poor brown people without jobs.

And I’ll tell you what: the Chinese aren’t going to pay the welfare for all of these brown people.

If you live in Megacity 1 without public housing assistance – which white people will not be allowed on, because of slavery and the Holocaust – your rent will be exactly six million.

The only thing that will stay the same is that the brown green new deal will still have a Jew behind it.

Only this will be a purple Jew.

Strap yourselves in, lads.

Because this can only get weirder from here on in.