Goodyear Tire recently took steps to indoctrinate their workforce into the Black Lives Matter agenda, encouraging employees to wear apparel showing support for Black Lives Matter while prohibiting them from showing support for Donald Trump or the police. In my piece on the news item, I noted that it was obviously illegal to say you could support one political party and not the other, but that they are thinking that in the current climate they are able to get away with it.

The question is: Why do they want to get away with it? Why is a tire company effectively compelling their workers to support a radical revolutionary Marxist movement that is currently rioting in several major American cities, burning buildings and beating people bloody?

The simple answer is that there are women and people of color in the Human Resources department pushing it.

It’s probably more complicated than that, however. It’s hard to believe the company would go out of its way to disenfranchise its own workers, which are obviously going to be an overwhelming majority Trump supporters, while also blatantly breaking the law, simply to satisfy the HR department. More than likely, this is part of the larger plot to completely reorganize society, and is almost certainly being introduced to the company from outside.

We’re talking a lot about the Marxist elements of this new order, but there are also extremely “capitalist” elements, involving a new economic order that will be entirely dominated by a few massive multinational corporations. We’ve been heading in that direction for a long time, of course, but the coronavirus hoax has put things into hyperdrive. I recently revealed the depression of having to cancel my self-help book, given that this manufactured collapse made much or most of it irrelevant. One of the major sections was about work, and a big part of that was about starting small businesses. That’s over now, presumably until the system completely collapses in on itself, at which point people will be able to start their own slave market.

At the outset of the hoax, it was estimated that there were 7.5 million small businesses in America – a heartening number – and that all were at risk of failing. A recent Washington Post piece noted that we have no idea what the small business situation is, how many of them have collapsed, because there is no governmental or private body keeping track. However, all the way back in May, when businesses were still getting the PPP money, it was estimated that 100,000 had already failed.

Meanwhile, the billionaire class – particular those in Silicon Valley – have been increasing their wealth by hundreds of billions. It is hard to say how much the corporations themselves are raking in, but according to a certain Orange Man, the markets are doing swimmingly as the people drown. The economy is a zero sum game, and what we are witnessing is the wealth of small businesses being transferred, wholesale, to the multinational corporations controlled by the elite ruling minority.

You see: as the goyim are running around like their hair is on fire, freaking out about a virus, the reorganization scheme goes a whole lot deeper than simply black people going nuts. We are going to have a Marxist social order, but the economy is going to be a caricature of a capitalist nightmare, akin to what we’ve seen in so many cyberpunk stories.

The order that they are planning will have people only being able to make the decision to work in a corporation, a government, or an NGO pushing a social agenda. It is likely that these workplaces will begin playing a more direct role in people’s lives, including guiding them morally. The plan, most likely, is to have people work generationally at these companies; that is, your children are raised to work for the company you work for, with the company playing a direct role in the education of young people.

Although you might still be able to find some low IQ moron somewhere using 1990s memes about the right-wing being the party of big business, the fact is that since the 1990s, massive corporations have been moving in the direction of the Democrat Party (or the equivalent in Europe, though that is more complicated), and they’ve spent huge amounts of money on marketing an image of progressiveness, including extreme support for man-on-man anal sex, women, black people and mass immigration (the latter makes sense in terms of economics, the others only make sense in terms of selling an image). This has led to the Democrat Party abandoning nearly all of its union-type moderate socialist policies with regards to regulating corporations or guarding workers’ rights.

All of the negative sentiment that was once aimed at corporations is now aimed at middle class white people, as the Marxist ideology was transmuted into a confusing mess. The original Marxist doctrine of class warfare was replaced with race, sex and now “gender” warfare. A normal heterosexual white male is at the top, needing to be overthrown, while the bottom of the order, the most oppressed of all, would presumably be a mentally retarded black transsexual in a wheelchair. The stated goal is to invert this order, and put heterosexual white men on the bottom.

I have very little sympathy for orthodox Marxism, but we must admit that the initial premises at least made sense on their face. You can see how someone would think that it was unfair that a small group of generational nobility controlled society while everyone else was left working at a factory or at the docks. The solution of building a middle class was a much better solution to the problem than killing all the rich people and collectivizing the proletariat, but the basic premises of Marxist thought were coherent.

This current new version of Marxism is pretty hard to get a handle on, rationally. In this order, actual status in society becomes literally irrelevant, to the point where Michelle Obama can give a speech at the Democrat National Convention claiming to be oppressed while teleconferencing in from a twelve million dollar mansion in Martha’s Vineyard. She could, according to this doctrine, be “oppressed” by a homeless white person drinking milk in her presence.

Within this paradigm, a corporation can have moral authority over an individual, if the corporation follows the moral mandates of the established Marxist ideology. You’re going to be looking at a reality where these corporations effectively own their employees, and are required to give them moral indoctrination.

There is a complete agenda which was already established before any of us heard of it, and it is currently being rolled out. Goodyear might have jumped the gun, but what they’re doing is something that all corporations will be doing shortly.

Audio allegedly recorded during a “diversity training session” for employees of Goodyear Tires in Topeka, Kansas has leaked online. It features a company executive discussing the tire manufacturer’s “zero tolerance” policy which prohibits employees from wearing clothing that show support for the police or the belief that all lives matter.

In the audio, obtained by a local news station from an anonymous employee of the company, the executive can be heard telling the proletariat employees the new rules of order in the factory.

Goodyear LIED pic.twitter.com/GdJnA9LBN1

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 20, 2020

The exec declares, “Some people may wish to express their views on social justice or inequity or equality issues such as black lives matter or LGBTQ pride on their face coverings, shirts or wristbands. That will be deemed approved because it applies with a zero-tolerance stance.”

“However, If any associate wears all, blue, white lives matter shirts or face coverings, that will not be appropriate.”

He continues: “The rules now around what you can wear, let’s try and comply with these so that way you know everybody feels good in this factory. I want to make sure guys think about what we do.”

The audio release comes after a shockingly Orwellian image from what was presumably the same meeting was published by local outlet WIBW. It showed a PowerPoint which read “Zero Tolerance” and listed the things that would be allowed and those that wouldn’t be.

Along with banning support for the police and expression of the belief that the lives of non-blacks have value, the Orwellian instructions explicitly banned Donald Trump attire then all political materials in general. The idea obviously is that the Black Lives Matter Marxist revolutionary movement is somehow “nonpolitical.” Defining leftist political agendas as “not political” is a new trend that has arisen with the BLM movement.

By any conceivable definition of the term, Black Lives Matter is a political movement, which engages in political activism and affects electoral politics. But the left has decided to frame their political movement as a moral crusade of good vs. evil, and some of their agenda is so morally righteous that it stops being political at all.

President @realDonaldTrump on Goodyear: "I'm not happy with Goodyear." pic.twitter.com/KZYtYnkOUu

— Team Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TeamTrump) August 19, 2020

To put this in perspective: I am a very strong supporter of the right to life. I would not consider the murder of an unborn child a political act. That having been said, the fact of reality is that abortion is a hot-button political issue in that one party is trying to restrict it while the other party is trying to expand it. There are one-issue voters on both sides of this issue. There are activist organizations on both sides of the issue. I do not think that any single pro-life activist would claim that abortion is “not a political issue.” If someone wears a pro-life or pro-abortion t-shirt, they’re first and foremost stating a political position. Before abortion was legalized, no one wore anti-abortion t-shirts, and if there weren’t people trying to restrict it, no one would be wearing anti-fetus t-shirts. It was politics that legalized it in the first place and it is politics that are beginning to restrict it in some places.

This is to say: there are a lot of issues involved in politics that people view as moral issues. They do not stop being political issues because they are moral issues. I’m willing to accept that Democrats believe that people are being oppressed and that they believe this is a moral issue. However, that does not somehow magically make the discussion of their response to this nonpolitical.

There are a lot of implications to this, the underlying concept being that anyone who opposes BLM is beyond the pale and outside of the realm of politics itself. The fact that the movement has been endorsed by Republicans like Mitt Romney bolsters the claim that the issue is so cut and dry that if you don’t actively support abolishing the police, ending cash bail, closing all prisons, ending racial discrimination laws so that whites can be actively discriminated against by law and all of the other positions of the BLM movement then you have exited the realm of politics and entered the realm of otherworldly and metaphysical evil.

Don’t buy GOODYEAR TIRES – They announced a BAN ON MAGA HATS. Get better tires for far less! (This is what the Radical Left Democrats do. Two can play the same game, and we have to start playing it now!).

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2020

Redefining Democrat political agendas as nonpolitical also has direct practical implications. It is obviously illegal for Goodyear Tire to tell employees that they are allowed to support one political agenda and not another. The company’s lawyers know this is illegal, and yet they are going all in on the idea that in this current climate, they can get away with it.