A drug lord appreciating his drug empire

Brown asylum-seeking refugee migrants are in even more danger now.

Los Angeles Times:

The kidnappers came to the shelter near the U.S.-Mexico border looking for Cuban migrants, favored targets because relatives in the United States are known to pay exorbitant ransoms to free abducted loved ones.

In cartel-dominated Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, a gateway to the United States, it’s a lucrative racket: Snatch a migrant from Cuba, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Venezuela or elsewhere; commandeer their cellphones; then call U.S. relatives demanding thousands of dollars.

Cuban migrants have relatives in the United States that are able to pay “exorbitant” ransoms? It seems they’re doing pretty good for themselves.

No need to spell out the consequences of nonpayment in the lawless Mexican border state of Tamaulipas, known for mass graves and massacres of migrants — including hundreds slain by gunmen of the Zetas cartel outside the town of San Fernando in 2010-11.

On Aug. 3, when the Rev. Aaron Mendez, an evangelical pastor and head of the Amar shelter, refused the kidnappers’ demands, the thugs took him away.

…

The case has dramatized the systematic fashion of abductions and shakedowns faced by migrants and others at an especially sensitive time — when U.S. authorities have been expelling tens of thousands of Central Americans, Cubans and others back to Mexico’s crime-ridden border cities under the Trump administration’s Migrant Protection Protocols, known informally as “Remain in Mexico.”

It’s Americans’ fault that these valiant persons of color are getting kidnapped by gangs and cartels formed by other valiant persons of color.

You yourself may not be kidnapping browns or chopping them up with machetes, but by not giving them your money and your house, you are complicit in their suffering. That makes you at least as guilty as the kidnappers — perhaps even more so, because you have the economic resources to prevent these kidnapping schemes but you’re just not giving them away!

Under the program, rolled out in January in the border cities of Tijuana and San Diego — and later expanded to other U.S.-Mexico crossings — more than 37,500 U.S.-bound migrants have been returned to Mexico to wait for U.S. court hearings. Many intend to seek political asylum in the U.S.

More than 3,000 have been dispatched across the Rio Grande to Tamaulipas since the program was extended in July. Mexican authorities provide little housing or other aid to the returnees, who are often left to fend for themselves.

If someone enters your home against your will, you have an undocumented guest — not an invader — and we have to treat guests with the utmost respect no matter their guest-documentation status. Guests are just guests. There are no illegal guests.

That’s why Mexicans are also in the wrong here. Giving lots of free stuff to their guests should be their values and who they are.

Extortion-minded mobs view vulnerable migrants as walking ATMs. They are easy prey, lacking family ties in Mexico and known to have U.S. relatives with access to dollars. Mob halcones — hawks, or lookouts — watch bus stations and other strategic spots, eyeing potential quarry.

Though drug trafficking provides the bulk of cartel income, Mexico’s organized crime groups are multibillion-dollar conglomerates that also control migrant smuggling, kidnapping and other illicit ventures, working in cahoots with corrupt police and politicians.

Corporations are running most countries nowadays, and cartels are Mexico’s most successful corporations.

Three Honduran migrant families who returned to Mexico under the Migrant Protection Protocols recently recounted in interviews with the Los Angeles Times how gangsters kidnapped them, obliging relatives in the United States to pay ransoms. All three said they had alerted U.S. immigration officials that they had been abducted in Mexico — but were nonetheless sent back to Mexico.

U.S. authorities say multiple factors are considered when determining whether apprehended migrants should be sent back to Mexico, including whether they face persecution or torture. Claims by migrants are documented, authorities said, but fear of being kidnapped does not necessarily disqualify detainees from being sent back to Mexico.

Fear of being a brown surrounded by other browns should be enough reason to give these browns asylum, or at least a place to wait for the asylum hearing where they’re not surrounded by other browns.

Letting browns be around other browns is pure evil because browns do evil things to other browns.

Beti Suyapa Ortega, 36, said she was unaware of the extent of the danger when she boarded a Mexican public bus last month headed for the U.S. border with her son, Robinson Javier Melara, 17. The single mother of five from the northern Honduran state of Yoro said she was fleeing maras, or gangs, that demanded weekly extortion payments at her family’s grocery store.

“The maras in Honduras are bad, but here I think they are even worse,” Ortega said.

…

On Aug. 4, Ortega said, she and her son were on a bus when a group of about 10 men flagged the vehicle down on the outskirts of Nuevo Laredo. The gangsters demanded that passengers produce identification and forced all foreigners off the vehicle, she said.

Ortega and her son were taken to a house where about a dozen other migrants were being held, she said, and the kidnappers grabbed her phone. They found the number of her younger brother, who had arrived in Atlanta a few months earlier. The captors snapped photos of Ortega and her son and dispatched the images to her brother, demanding $8,000 for their release, she said.

…

On Aug. 18, when the money had been paid, Ortega said, she and her son were driven to a spot along the Rio Grande, where the cartel strictly controls illicit crossings, and taken across in an inflated tire tube.

Ortega and her son were detained in U.S. custody in Texas for two nights, she said, before being released with a court date of Dec. 10 in San Antonio.

“We told them (U.S. immigration authorities) we had been kidnapped, but they didn’t believe us,” Ortega said.

On Aug. 20, U.S. Border Patrol officers returned Ortega, her son and 18 other distraught migrants on foot to Nuevo Laredo across the Juarez-Lincoln International Bridge, in a sullen procession repeated here daily beneath the blazing sun. Many clutched transparent plastic bags emblazoned with the seal of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and containing notices to appear in immigration court.

But Ortega said she had no intention of sticking around Nuevo Laredo. She and fellow migrants were waiting for bus transport to Tapachula, a Mexican city near the Guatemalan border. The one-way rides are a Mexican government initiative that serves a double purpose — removing discouraged migrants from the perilous border zone, while also diminishing the chances that they will make the long and hazardous trip back for U.S. court dates.

“We’ve had enough,” Ortega said.

Also waiting for the bus was Maria Suyapa Rodriguez, 35, and her 12-year-old son. She and her son, she said, had also been kidnapped — on Aug. 15 at the Nuevo Laredo bus terminal. The two were released two days later when her sister in New York agreed to pay a ransom, said Rodriguez, who did not know the amount. The pair subsequently crossed the Rio Grande, she said, and surrendered to the Border Patrol, which returned them to Mexico.

Like Ortega, Rodriguez said she had given up and would forgo her Jan. 10 U.S. court date and return home to Honduras.

The kidnapping gangs are discouraging many like Ortega and Rodriguez from sticking around for their asylum hearings, but the numbers are likely not enough to make any difference.

This situation shows the paradoxical nature of these migrants. They have no money and no plan.  They just show up and expect America or Mexico to provide food and shelter — yet they’re somehow good for the economy.

How do Americans benefit from granting asylum to these people?

Are we already past the point where people ask “what’s in it for me?” and just do things because “it’s the right thing to do”?

Rosana Candido (left) and Kacyla Pessoa (right)

Brown females also have that jungle demon thing inside of them.

The Sun:

A MUM and her lesbian lover tore off her nine-year-old son’s penis before beheading him because he reminded her of her dad.

Mum Rosana Cândido, 27, and Kacyla Pessoa, 28, of Brazil, stabbed the boy over a dozen times and removed all the skin from his face before butchering his body.

The pair were said to have even used a knife to try to gouge out the boy’s eyeballs to prevent possible recognition.

They bodged a bid to burn some of him on a barbecue so stuffed his remains in a suitcase dumped in a sewer, police said.

Other parts were found in two backpacks at their home in Brazil.

…

In a gory twist, they are also accused of tearing off Cândido’s son Rhuan’s penis a year ago during horrifying home-made surgery.

…

Local reports say: “After removing his penis, the women said they sewed an improvised version of the female organ onto the mutilated area.”

Cândido reportedly claimed the lad was a “burden” and a hindrance to her relationship with Pessoa.

She also “felt hatred and no love” for him because he reminded her of father, who allegedly abused her.

Rhuan’s dad, who lives in Acre, is said to have told officers that Cândido run away with the boy five years ago when he lost custody

I recently wrote about how browns love to abuse innocent beings under their care. This is a more extreme example of that.

See, it doesn’t matter if they’re male or female, young or old. They all have this perverse torture-murder programming inside.

We’ve known this since we’ve known about them.

But for some reason the Jews were able to successful brainwash our people into thinking these are human beings just like us. The “noble savage,” the wise brown in tune with nature and many other types of stock characters used throughout these artificial cultural works have all merged together and managed to make people disbelieve their eyes and embrace a romanticized image of these monsters.

Whites, on the other hand, managed to build civilization out of the wilderness. Isn’t the ability to use and transmute nature evidence of us being in harmony with nature? We’re the only ones that care about the planet, but we’re told that we’re some kind of virus eating away at the world and that these creatures are some kind of wise post-nirvana humans that are one with nature.

Have you seen the filth they live in?

This idealization of browns is a useful tool for white genocide. If Americans knew what these beasts are really up to, there’d be a much stronger opposition to the idea of flooding the United States with them.

What these lesbians did to that kid is no different than what browns do to themselves in general. Cartel killings are an example of that.

It’s gruesome beyond imagination.

This is not something that you can take out of them by giving them stuff and letting them live among whites.

Importing brown people also means importing what brown people do.

It means importing hell.

Tens of thousands of terrorist attacks, murders, rapes, gang-rapes, kidnappings, assaults and suicides have been shared and streamed across social media sites for years without anyone caring.

But one White guy watches Goblin Slayer one too many times, and then tries to save an island of Hobbitses from being invaded, and all of a sudden there’s a problem.

Japan Today:

New Zealand and France will bring together global leaders at a Paris summit next month aimed at stopping social media being used to organize and promote terrorism, the countries’ leaders announced Wednesday.

How about stopping the actual terrorism instead?

There’s a very easy way to do that, BTW – stop flooding your countries with Moslems, and get rid of the Moslems already here.

Even Brenton Tarrant’s attack was the fault of Moslems. He wouldn’t have done it if there were no Moslems in New Zealand.

Political leaders and tech company executives have been called to a meeting — to be co-chaired by New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and French President Emmanuel Macron — in Paris on May 15.

They will be asked to commit to a pledge called the “Christchurch Call” designed to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online.

Keep in mind – the working definition of “terrorist and violent extremist content” is “White people saying they want to exist.”

Ardern said the March 15 terrorist attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, in which 50 Muslim worshippers were killed, saw social media used “in an unprecedented way as a tool to promote an act of terrorism and hate”.

The mosque attacks were live-streamed on the internet and showed distressing footage of the gunman firing indiscriminately at men, women and children.

That was not a terrorist attack, those vermin being brought there by Jews was the terrorist attack. This was just some guy defending his people’s land from invaders – an act of Demographic Self-Defense.

And it wasn’t in the least bit distressing, at least if you’re not an invader yourself or a dumb whore.

In Paris, the Elysee presidential palace said the meeting would ensure that “new, concrete measures are taken so that what happened in Christchurch does not happen again”.

If you stop turning your country into an artificial state that will inevitably turn into a parody of the Ottoman Empire, then it won’t happen again.

Israel – the only country in the world where it’s legal to shoot Moslems… And they’re doing it on the Moslems’ land too!

But that’s not gonna happen – because that’s the whole reason Jews and their barren whores are bringing these things into our countries in the first place.

“We all need to act, and that includes social media providers taking more responsibility for the content that is on their platforms, and taking action so that violent extremist content cannot be published and shared,” Ardern said. “It’s critical that technology platforms like Facebook are not perverted as a tool for terrorism, and instead become part of a global solution to countering extremism.”

As much as I hate Facebook, Twitter and all, they don’t cause terrorism.

If you force different people to live around each other, they’re gonna eventually start killing each other, and if you bring Moslems to a place, those Moslems are gonna do terrorism.

It’s been like that for literally the entire existence of our species, and it has nothing to do with social media.

Macron has previously stated his ambition for France to take a leading role in devising new regulatory measures “to reconcile technology with the common good”.

You’d think with all the non-stop riots everywhere in France, the President of that country would have other concerns…

…but you’d be wrong.

Ardern said the joint action was not aimed at curbing freedom of expression but at preventing extremist violence from spreading online.

“I don’t think anyone would argue that the terrorist on March 15 had a right to livestream the murder of 50 people and that is what this call is very specifically focussed on,” she said.

…

New Zealand has banned both the livestreamed footage of the attack and the manifesto written and released by Brenton Tarrant, who faces 50 murder charges and 39 of attempted murder following the mosque attacks.

I would argue that yes, he did.

Especially since there is literally nothing wrong with anything he did.

Literally.

Nothing.

Wrong.

And let me tell you – there’s a lot of us who understand he did literally nothing wrong…