Alex Crow

A 30 year old with an 18 year old is like pedophilia.

We need laws to stop it.

Oh – I guess there already are laws to stop it.

New York Post:

Police in Mobile, Alabama, are investigating a defrocked priest over claims that he had been “grooming” a recent high school grad before the pair shipped out to Italy.

Former priest Alex Crow, 30, is on the run with a 18-year-old graduate of McGill-Toolen Catholic High School, where he spoke in theology classes and heard confessions, according to local reports.

Although police initially didn’t suspect any romance between the pair, they soon discovered that the teen had received a love letter from the unholy man on Valentine’s Day, while she was still a student.

“I believe there was some grooming that’s gone on, and you’ve got a much older adult interacting with teenage girls in an inappropriate way,” Sheriff Paul Burch told NBC 15. He also suggested that more female students may have been involved with Crow.

Crow, who was ordained in 2021, had been assigned to the Corpus Christi Parish, but was removed from the clergy by the Archdiocese of Mobile last month after he abandoned his post and ran off to Europe with the teen.

What is the purpose of human sexuality?

Are we not allowed to ask that?

If the purpose is reproduction, then there is absolutely nothing wrong with a man of any age approaching and romancing young girls.

I don’t even know what the “grooming” law is, actually. I’m going to have to look into it. I think you’re allowed to flirt with girls before they’re 18 and then engage them sexually after their birthday, right?

I mean, how is it possible that this is illegal? What exactly would the crime be?

Also, the age of consent in Alabama is 16 anyway?

Of course, there is a problem here with the fact the guy was a priest. Either that, or there is a problem with the policy of celibacy for priests.

By the way, celibacy was not mandatory for Catholic Priests until the 12th century and marriage is still the norm for Eastern Catholic (“Orthodox”) priests.

Moreover: in 1970, Joseph Ratzinger – who became the Pope and was run out by homosexuals – wrote a letter calling for a council to be convened to discuss mandatory celibacy. He never officially condemned it, but clearly wanted it changed. He was an anti-homosexual activist.

I only recently found out about this. After reading the article, I intended to write a piece about it, but sometimes these things never get done, so I’m mentioning it here. Ratzinger died recently, and published a posthumous book saying faggot priests in America are having orgies in the churches. He was run out by the faggots because he was about to start making moves – one of which almost certainly would have been abolishing mandatory celibacy.

Celibacy for priests was always an option, but making it mandatory is just wrong. Sorry. I’m saying it. It doesn’t make any sense.

This rule was initial implemented not for spiritual reasons, but to prevent priests from gifting church land to their kids. Seriously. It was purely political. Look it up. I think there are probably other ways to solve that problem!

Saint Paul didn’t stutter on this issue: celibacy is preferred, if a man is capable of it, but if he’s not, there’s nothing wrong with marriage. This is from Corinthians, so it is a letter to the church leadership (he obviously wasn’t saying that most people in general should try to be celibate):

Very straightforward: the ability for celibacy is a gift from God, and if you have it, embrace it. If you don’t, then get married.

I have brought this up to Catholics who support mandatory celibacy. They will start with the “you can’t just interpret a random verse!”

But it’s not my interpretation – it’s the interpretation of the Church itself from the 4th to the 11th century, and is the current interpretation of the Eastern Church. If you are blocking men from getting married while being priests, you’re actually violating what Paul said. He said it for a reason. Now, we have a den of homosexuals in the Church, and a literal homosexual Pope!

The Church is now literally having discussions about gay marriage, there are anal flags in Catholic Churches in Germany, they are talking about woman priests – but what Ratzinger suggested more than 40 years ago, that mandatory celibacy be reevaluated, is off limits. It’s obvious that at this point, it is the homosexual cult that has infiltrated the Church that is pushing for continued mandatory celibacy.

There is zero wrong with a Catholic questioning this. Again – the man who would become Pope questioned it.

You have a lot, lot, lot of men who would like to devote their lives to God. When you then add the variable of “oh and you can never have sex or children,” you cut out at least 99% of those men.

Again: celibacy was always an option, and there is something special about a man who devotes himself to that, and I do think in some ways he is going to have a closer connection to God by suppressing the base impulse. But that’s assuming he’s actually doing it, and is not a secret homosexual! How many of the current priests are secret homosexuals???

You’re going to enforce a POLITICAL POLICY from the middle ages at the cost of being infiltrated and destroyed by homosexuals???

Obviously, a policy of celibacy could be enforced without being infiltrated by homosexuals. But priest is a very good job for a homosexual – he can explain why he’s not married, and he can have access to pubescent boys. And, when you’ve limited your pool to the point that the church as limited the pool, you are by default going to end up with more homosexuals, and now you have a takeover by homosexual and homosexuals recruiting other homosexuals (not least the alter boys that they turned homosexual by molesting them!).

E. Michael Jones, who is I think in some ways the last true public intellectual, is a hardcore Catholic and will defend priestly celibacy. However, E. Michael Jones is also a massive critic of the current state of the Church, and it sure would be nice to have a guy like him serving as a Bishop, wouldn’t it???

Why isn’t he serving as a Bishop, I wonder???

Well, maybe ask his wife, kids, and grandkids, huh???

Sorry. This is so obvious and it needs to be said. Ratzinger basically said it, I’m saying it. Enough is enough.

That Having Been Said…

There is probably a problem with a priest using his position as a priest to find the hottest teenage girl as his wife, even if you ban celibacy. I think it’s a pretty hard policy in the Orthodox Church that you must be married before you are ordained as a priest, because you shouldn’t really be able to use the authority of the Church – which is ultimately the authority of God – to pick the fittest girl you can find.

I mean, if you’re the parish priest, you presumably have authority over the parents of the girl you pick, and it just creates a kind of inappropriate situation.

Anyway, that’s a minor issue, and it is a separate issue from this guy, because he actually abandoned his post out of love. I assume this guy just got very smitten and I’m not blaming him for his decisions, necessarily. We don’t know the details of this situation.

Figuring out how to make it so people can’t become priests and then use that authority to get the hottest girl in town is a problem that was apparently dealt with during the MORE THAN 1000 YEARS that Christians did not mandate celibacy, so I’m sure we can find a solution to it now.

12-year-old Jade Gregory doesn’t know what a penis is

Oh the slut stole the car to go get FUCKED????

I’m a conservative, now let me tell you how she is actually the victim somehow!

I don’t know how she is the victim right now, let me think about how she is the victim, and then I will get back to you!

But we know for sure that she is the victim, and the only issue right now is coming up with a convoluted explanation as to how she is the victim and this is the fault of men somehow.

Please stand by while we put together that narrative for you.

New York Post:

A 12-year-old Florida girl stole her father’s car and picked up her 14-year-old friend to meet an online predator in Louisiana, officials said this weekend.

Baby-faced Jade Gregory, of Union County, was reported missing last week after she hopped behind the wheel of her parent’s Ford Taurus, went to meet her pal Khloe Larson, then drove out of state.

The two kids had apparently been corresponding with an unknown person online and planned to meet him in Louisiana, according to reports.

Their sudden disappearance triggered a Missing Child Alert, and their youthful images were flashed across billboards and television screens across several Southern states.

Gregory drove her father’s truck all the way from the Gainesville area to Mobile, Alabama — a roughly five-hour trek.

Authorities said they were not accompanied by an adult during their journey and they had voluntarily left their homes.

The girls were later shocked to see their images on a television in an Alabama convenience store — and eventually decided to turn themselves in to local police.

We still haven’t figured out the full story of how this is men’s fault. We will be getting back to you shortly.

But so far we have:

• Abused the innocence
• She didn’t understand
• She didn’t know what a penis is
• Mind control
• Secret words to manipulte the subconscious mind

Stay tuned and we will have a very clear story about how this girl’s choices were not actually her own choices, and were in fact, somehow, the fault of men.

Khloe Larson, 14

Everything is fine, guys.

Don’t even worry about it.

We’re on the road to a true utopia, and these are just the growing pains of an emerging paradise on earth.

We just have to stop Donald Trump and Russians, and everything will be wonderful.

New York Post:

A 12-year-old Oklahoma girl stabbed her little brother to death in the middle of the night Thursday, police said.

The young girl allegedly woke her parents up at their Tulsa residence shortly before midnight to tell them she had stabbed her 9-year-old brother, according to police.

Emergency officials performed CPR on the boy at the River Bank Plaza Apartments complex before rushing him to the hospital, where he was immediately taken into surgery.

The 9-year-old died shortly after 2:30 a.m., police said.

The boy’s sister was arrested and is being held at the Family Center for Juvenile Justice.

Police have not revealed a motive for the tragic killing, stating it will be the court’s burden to uncover intent.

“Obviously we did some interviews, but interviews with a 12-year-old are very preliminary,” Captain Meulenberg told Fox 23. “This, unfortunately, has no easy end or easy path, this is going to be a long convoluted process that’s going to be extremely taxing on everyone involved in this.”

Conservatives are unable to form a proper narrative about systemic societal collapse being signaled by the rise of child murderers, and instead revert to dumb slogans about banning knives.

Was “she” a biological girl?

— Exit/nopark (@ExitNopark) January 8, 2023

Ban all knives NOW: Kitchen knives, Swiss Army Knives, Toy Knives, Hunting Knives. Cut out scissors too. We cannot be too safe. FULL STOP.

— ‘Everyday Canadian’✊🏿 🇹🇼 🇭🇰 (@anonymousequal3) January 8, 2023

BAN ALL KNIVES!!!

— Ralph (@Ralphblunts) January 8, 2023

We need stricter knife laws

— ViennaCaptain (@TheAutQuill) January 8, 2023

Now we’ve got teenage girl gangs.

This is an even bigger threat than the blacks!

New York Post:

Two teens showed up to fight a 16-year-old girl at her home and allegedly attacked her mom instead — leaving the woman with a concussion, a broken nose and two black eyes, a report said.

Michelle Audo said she and her husband were asleep when their two daughters woke them up and said a “carload of girls” was outside their home in Blue Springs, Missouri, and wanted to fight the younger one, according to the Kansas City Star.

Audo, 48, told the paper that she went outside and told the girls in the white sedan to leave but they refused, demanding that her 16-year-old daughter come out and face them.

“I go, ‘You know, she’s not coming out.’ And they’re like, ‘Well, either she’s coming out or we’re coming in.’ And I’m like, ‘No, you’re not,’” Audo said.

“And then two of them jumped out of the car.”

A girl with blond hair allegedly punched Audo in the face and was joined by a girl with black hair, with both of them winding up on top of the older woman on the ground, according to a police report cited by the Star.

Audo’s older daughter, 18, pulled both girls off her mom and Audo’s husband used a cane to knock the blonde to the ground when she allegedly tried to attack Audo a second time, the Star said.

…

Audo said police told her that the girls in the car were as young as 13 and that her alleged assailants were charged with simple assault in the May 15 incident and faced prosecution in Youth Court, where juveniles charged with minor infractions are judged by their peers.

It’s almost like there is some kind of… hormonal issue.

Every body is beautiful. Even the bodies of fat, hairy, acne-ridden girls with small breasts.

Study Finds:

Childhood obesity is a growing problem in the United States. As of 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says nearly one in five children is obese. A new study finds this issue may also lead to developmental problems for girls entering adulthood. Researchers say obesity can throw off the timing of puberty in young girls.

A team from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has discovered that overweight girls can have more testosterone in their bodies. This can lead to irregular periods, acne, and excess body hair. Researchers add that puberty looks different among obese girls in terms of breast growth and reproductive hormones.

…

“We found that in mid- to late puberty, girls with greater total body fat demonstrated higher levels of some reproductive hormones including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), inhibin B and male-like hormones such as testosterone,” study author Dr. Natalie Shaw says in a media release.

“In some girls with higher total body fat, higher testosterone levels were associated with irregular menstrual cycles, acne and excess body hair. In late puberty, girls with greater body fat also showed delayed breast maturation, as determined by breast ultrasound, and earlier menarche. There were no differences in maturation of the ovaries or uterus as a function of body fat.”

Imagine being a woman and having fat rolls that are bigger than your breasts, that your body starts growing a mustache against your will, that your legs look like cacti, and that your face is full of disgusting pimples.

Imagine what that can do to your mind during your teenage years.

Parents of overweight kids should be charged with child abuse.

Every female knows that all of her power comes from her body, and her ability to make men do things for her using her body. Women have literally no ability to do anything of value, and they cannot survive without men. As such, any attempt by a man to prevent a woman from using sex to manipulate men is viewed as “a sexist attack on women.”

Someone has to stop these sluts.

They need to be beaten and gang-raped.

euronews:

Girls in French high schools were on Monday invited to dress “provocatively” to denounce sexism.

The #Lundi14Septembre (#Monday14September) hashtag was launched on social platforms after several female pupils complained they were refused entry to their high schools over the past few days because their clothes were judged to be “indecent”, according to French media.

Messages posted online called for female pupils to dare to wear “crop tops, skirts, and makeup” to “protest inappropriate remarks and dress codes in schools that largely concern girls”.

The movement was backed by the Mouvement National Lyceen — a union representing high school students — as well as feminist NGOs and charities against violence towards women.

“Our outfits are not the problem. The problem is harassment, assaults and rapes. Support for all those who refuse to make women feel guilty,” Nous Toutes, an NGO combatting sexism and sexist behaviours wrote on Twitter.

Another, “Osez le féminisme” (Give feminism a try!), said that principals and school advisers “should focus on sanctioning boys when they harass girls, rather than scantily-clad girls.”

“Shame must change sides! Educate boys and let girls choose their outfits,” it added.

Marlene Schiappa, the former minister for gender equality, now minister for citizenship, also offered her support.

“Today #Monday14September, young girls spontaneously decided all over France to wear skirts, low-cut or crop tops and makeup to assert their freedom in the face of sexist judgements and acts. As a mother, I support them with sorority and admiration,” she posted on Twitter.

According to the latest annual report from the High Council for Equality released in March, 99 per cent of French women affirm having been the victims of a sexist act or comment in 2019.

The report also found that younger generations are less tolerant of sexism and “more combative” with 92 per cent of young people considering sexism to be a societal problem.

Any questioning of young people is useless, as young people are the number one people who know that if you disagree with the system, it will come down on you like a train car pushed off a cliff.

This entire framing of the concept that telling women to wear decent clothing is tantamount to rape is utterly nonsensical.

The issue here is that women wearing slutty clothing is distracting to boys and men. The masculine sexual arousal mechanism is very much visually based, so when you have these greasy sluts running around half naked, you’re going to be in a constant state of sexual agitation. This is cruel to boys. Boys do not deserve to be agitated and harassed by these women.

Of course, the entire “right to dress like a prostitute” movement is about wanting to be able to distract and manipulate boys. If boys react by calling them whores or slapping their asses or whatever other form of so-called “sexual harassment,” what they’re doing is giving the girls a hard time so that they will not wear these distracting clothes. (Maybe the boys don’t necessarily know that this is what they are doing, but this is where the impulse comes from.)

There is no way to come to a peaceful resolution here. The most logical thing to do with these sluts going absolutely apeshit and on a rampage demanding all of these special slut rights is to return to sex segregated schooling.

Honestly, we never should have stopped that practice. Including girls in men’s classes was always going to distract the boys. Every single study, ever, shows that both boys and girls do better at sex-segregated schools. This was always self-evident, which is why when they invented schools in the first place they were sex-segregated. It’s also why the elite still sex-segregate schools, while the masses of goyim are forced to subjugate their boys to nonstop sexual harassment by sluts.

So: the elite keep their sons in private boys only schools, then they not only force you to send your sons to schools with girls, but have all of these “women’s rights” organizations come out and denounce you as evil for not wanting girls dressed up like literal strippers in your son’s school.

When the ruling elite are doing something completely different than you, then constantly using their organizations to attack you and demand that you keep doing more and more extreme versions of a thing they totally refuse to do, you need to start asking what’s going on.

You know what would fix women’s emotional problems?

Having sex with more strangers they meet on dating apps.

We need to figure out a way to get more semi-anonymous sex with high value men to our girls, or they’re going to wipe themselves out.

The Independent:

Suicides among teenage girls and young women have almost doubled in seven years, new figures show.

The number of women and girls between the ages of 10 and 24 recorded as having taken their own lives has increased by 94 per cent since 2012, from 81 to 159 last year – a record high, according to the Office for National Statistics.

Overall, 1,299 deaths were registered as suicide among females in England in 2019, up from 1,221 deaths registered in the previous year, marking the highest rate since the year 2004.

While suicide among men remains considerably higher, experts have raised concerns about the unprecedented rise in young women taking their lives, highlighting the role of social media.

The figures show regional disparities, with the highest female suicide rate recorded in Yorkshire and the Humber, at 7.3 per 100,000, compared with 4.1 per 1000,000 in the northeast (the area with the lowest rate) and 5.2 per 100,000 in the whole of England.

It’s time for a global action to get women more and better quality men to have sex with from dating apps, for the sake of their psychological health.

Science tells us that every time a woman gets dicked down by a hot stranger from Tinder, she restores 10 HP on her mental health bar.

We will call this project “Get Her Dicked for Life.”

Given the choice, women are known to go the slut route. Apparently, that’s true even if they’re children.

Daily Mail:

Girls as young as six are sending sexually explicit texts during the coronavirus pandemic, research suggests.

The disturbing figure emerged as parents were offered a million free downloads of a phone safety app via the Government’s website.

So-called ‘sexts’ typed out by children in the UK have risen 183 per cent during lockdown.

There has been a 55 per cent rise in sexts drafted during normal school hours, SafeToNet said.

The company’s app stops harmful messages being sent and offers guidance as a message is being composed.

The British technology start-up has analysed around 70million such messages sent by children and found girls are sending the majority.

Eleven-year-old girls and 13-year-old boys attempted to send the highest proportion of sexts and messages identified as cyber-bullying, but the app also stopped messages being sent from girls as young as six and boys aged nine.

That saying about idle hands being the devil’s workshop is quite relevant during the lockdown. This house arrest lifestyle is especially hard on kids, who are used to being outside their homes for school and interacting with their peers, playing and doing stuff.

All of their energy is now ready for the rotten depths of the internet to devour.

Six-year-olds have no business having unsupervised access to a smartphone — or any internet-enabled device for that matter — but, realistically speaking, this lockdown thing has been going on for far too long, and even the most well-intentioned parents are having a hard time keeping their kids entertained.

It’s a nightmare scenario, with nightmare consequences.

Getting 11-year-old girls to shove stuff up their vaginas in front of a webcam appears to have a similar level of difficulty as tricking them into thinking that you’re their 16-year-old boyfriend while in fact you’re a 21-year-old lesbian woman.

That is to say; it is pretty easy.

Daily Mail:

One in three child abuse images found online are now selfies with girls as young as 11 tricked into performing sex acts via web cam.

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) took action over 124,605 images of child abuse found online between January and November 2019, of which 37,112,  or 30 per cent, were self-generated.

More than three quarters of these images, 29,100 or 78 per cent, featured children aged 11 to 13, most of whom were girls.

The IWF and charity Marie Collins Foundation (MCF), that supports survivors of abuse, are calling on young men who find images or videos on porn sites that they believe may be of underage victims, to anonymously report what they have found.

Before the advent of smartphones, keeping your 11-year-old daughter away from the eyes of random internet creeps was a pretty straightforward task: you just needed to not give her access to a webcam or digital camera.

Now that phones are smart and can access the internet and take pictures, giving your daughter one of these devices so you can more easily reach her also means that she’s more easily reachable by everyone else.

Perhaps allowing young humans to fuse with these gadgets wasn’t the brightest decision.

Now everyone’s pretty much addicted to them.

Under UK law, anyone can be prosecuted for taking, sharing or possessing explicit images of under-18s.

Chief executive of the IWF, Susie Hargreaves, said the number of children being tricked or blackmailed into generating indecent images online is ‘fast becoming a national crisis‘.

She said: ‘Today’s data demonstrates the alarming rate at which self-generated imagery is increasing, especially among young girls – often in domestic settings.

‘These are images and videos where girls have been groomed, coerced and tricked into performing sexually over webcam, what is fast becoming a national crisis.

‘There has never been a more poignant time to shine a light on the uncomfortable truth we are now faced with.

‘While we’re working to prevent images from being taken in the first place, efforts to halt the spread of the ones in circulation, by encouraging young men to anonymously report any they may unintentionally stumble upon, is an important and much-needed step to help tackle the issue.

‘Young men might be at risk of stumbling across this content as a result of having unprecedented access to sexual content online – but they can also be the heroes that help us save many more victims of child sexual abuse.’

Young girls are being tricked into joining the camwhore business.

To prevent that without giving up the ability to call and text their daughters, fathers could opt to give their daughters dumb phones.

No camera, no web browser. Just phone calls and texting.

The above is just one example.

There’s really no reason why 11-year-old girls should be able to take pictures of themselves and access social media and the internet without their parents’ supervision.

The IWF works to get images of child abuse removed from the internet and is in contact with law enforcement agencies across the world.

Chief executive of the Marie Collins Foundation, Tink Palmer, said: ‘Online sexual abuse is not a victimless crime.

‘The children in these images and videos are real and they are harmed every time the content is viewed and shared.

‘All internet users need to understand that they are breaking the law if they view this material, regardless of who has taken or uploaded it.

‘Everyone can play their part in ridding the internet of this scourge by reporting illegal images and, ultimately, in protecting children.’

Once the video or picture is online, it is almost impossible to remove it from the internet, and if for some reason it is removed from every website, there’s no guarantee that it won’t be uploaded it again.

The only way to prevent these girls from suffering the consequences of people viewing indecent and illegal content of them online is to prevent them from producing said illicit content in the first place.

“Innocent” girl browsing the dark parts of the Internet.

Girls in their early teens nowadays are engaging in all kinds of stuff that older generations don’t even suspect.

These posts from the Reddit “Am I the Asshole?” community show a glimpse into the current state of teenage women.

First case, from the Reddit post:

My daughter is thirteen, and very introverted. I love her, and she’s the funniest, smartest person I know, but she doesn’t have very good social skills. She has severe anxiety and has struggled with clinical depression since she was nine. She’s my only child, FYI.

Our family’s moving between states at the moment and currently staying at a friends’ house for a month. This whole summer, she’s been very distracted by her phone. She’s always been an avid reader, and when we asked what she was doing all the time she said she was just reading stories online. We assumed it was e-books or something.

We noticed she went over the data limit for the month, so her father asked for her phone and the password. She said no to giving us the password, but agreed to turn the phone off for the rest of the month to avoid going over more. We were understandably concerned, she’s normally very complacent, respectful, and not at all defensive about her phone. So we threatened to take it away entirely unless she told us. She did, after a screaming, sobbing shit-fit, the likes of which I haven’t seen since she was a toddler. When we opened it, we found tons of extremely explicit fanfiction. She’s never shown any interest in sex before, and all of this was between two male characters from a TV show we knew she loved (though we didn’t know how much). There was fanart too. Not all of it was explicit, some of it just seemed like plain old creative writing, but I went through all of it in front of her. She said she’s not using it to get off, she was just curious and found it interesting. I said I was going to start getting into the community too so that I could understand it and she could talk about it with me, but she seemed very opposed to the idea. She begged me not to talk about it more with her father (they have a weird, cold relationship, unfortunately) and I didn’t in front of her. But we find this very concerning.

Given what I know about her lack of social skills, I couldn’t help but feel this wasn’t helping. So I deleted all of what she had saved as well as the pictures. I don’t care that it was gay in nature, I’ve been pretty sure since she was six that she’s lesbian. But this can’t be normal or healthy. I took her phone for a week, removed the password, and when we see her reading things now we always ask her specifically to tell us what it is. She seems to have stopped, I’m not going to check her browsing history.

I told some of my girlfriends about it and they said I was being controlling and insensitive, and that telling them about it was humiliating for her. She doesn’t know I told them, so it can’t be humiliating, and I just want what’s best for her. I can’t imagine this is.

Am I the asshole?

You can see what the consensus on Reddit is from the comments down below:

YTA — this is a typical phase a lot of pre-teen girls go through. i myself did when i was younger (18F now) and am perfectly fine. being 13, it’s a time where you explore your sexuality and are curious about it. it was unnecessary for you to violate her privacy and, in a way, ruin her trust in you.

edit: and “she seems to have stopped”? lol nope. she’s just reading late at night within the security of her room.

…

Yeah one of my friends had a similar experience with her daughter who is about 12. I told her I read that stuff when I was about her age and went even further watching porn online back then. This is pretty much the norm with internet access being widely available, now.

…

I was about 15 when I was caught by mom reading stories like that online. Like OP’s daughter I was scolded and punished. All that led to was covering my online tracks better which was pretty easy since my mom is kinda tech illiterate. Don’t get me wrong I love my momma but she doesn’t know the half of what I do online and she never will because what happened when I was a teen.

…

I don’t know what it is with pre-teens and male gay fanfiction but damn they love it. I reckon I read more Wattpad stories in my pre-teens then actual books over my childhood

On the one hand, it’s natural for 13-year-old girls to be interested in sex. On the other hand, it’s understandable that the mother is creeped out by her daughter’s uh… particular interests.

But it is what it is.

I can vouch for this male gay fan fiction thing being ridiculously popular among pubescent girls. I personally know of 3 cases of girls that were REALLY INTO IT back when they were around 12. One of those cases is blood-related, and she was so open about it that it was clear that this thing was deemed as normal among her group of friends.

Here’s another Reddit post with a similar case:

My daughter (15) lives between me and my ex. I think my ex is a bit too progressive and maybe lax in her parenting, but usually I’m outvoted between her and my daughter. Besides, we think showing one set of rules between both households is better for my daughter. The whole “united front” thing, and punishments and values are mostly the same no matter who she’s living with. I support my ex in most parenting decisions she makes, and I expect her to support me as much as possible.

System’s breaking down because she won’t.

This week I found what only can be described as porn on her phone, and after reviewing the internet history I’ve discovered plenty on her laptop. I knew my daughter read fanfiction, but this isn’t just fanfiction (there’s original works) and it’s not the kind that is appropriate for a kid her age. And I’m not only objecting to her reading X-rated smut (but I do object to that), I’m mostly concerned by the fact that all of it involves some form of torture and is non-consensual. Graphic, non-consensual smut.

I took away her phone, put child locks on her laptop, and grounded her. I called my ex to tell her to do the same, and she had the gall to tell me I’m being a tyrant and to reverse all my punishments because our daughter hasn’t done anything wrong. I was obviously confused, and she continued to accuse me of stunting our daughter’s sexual development by shaming her for a non-con/BDSM kink. But, like, non-consensual fantasies? When she’s fifteen?

I told my wife I’m not bending on this and I expect her to support me the way I’ve always supported her, and she returned that she can’t support me shaming our daughter and that when she comes back to my ex’s house none of my punishments will apply. She’s also just started talking about bringing our daughter back earlier this time before I “corrupt” her, which has stuck with me. My ex has an entirely different position I can’t even fathom, and I’m left wondering if I’m in the wrong.

AITA? Am I overreacting to this?

Women are weird, and they have these weird interests and this weird side to them that often makes men uncomfortable. Fighting to completely suppress their dark nature is a waste of energy and will eventually result in their degeneracy manifesting in some other way. You can’t make them not like rape, so why not piggy-back on their rape-affinity and make them submit to their husband?

Marriage, back in the day, used to mean wives completely submitting to husbands without being able to deny them sex. Not being able to deny sex to a man they find attractive is a very appealing idea to women, a fact that is evidenced by the popularity of this “non-consensual” fan fiction and the success of books such as Fifty Shades of Grey.

Nowadays marriage is not what it was originally intended to be. Wives can deny sex to their husbands, take half of their stuff whenever they feel like it, take their kids and destroy their lives for no reason other than boredom.

You know what would keep wives from getting bored?

Rape.

Rape is always the answer.

What I want you to get out of the reading of these cases is that taking advantage of women’s nature is better than fighting it. This doesn’t mean liberating them or accepting their degeneracy. It means channeling this side of them as fuel for something productive.

Teenage girls are going to be interested in sex, so why not marry them to good men instead of letting them deal with their lust on their own?

From another Reddit post:

My little sister is staying with me for the summer, and she will celebrate her 15th birthday here in about 3 weeks. I am 32M (she’s my half-sister, we only share our dad, hence the age difference). She’s currently alone here with me and my SO, and her parents will join us for the birthday party.

Everything was going perfectly for the past 3 weeks, she’s a really good kid, loves to help in the kitchen, does chores (voluntarily!), takes our dogs for a walk and so on. But several days ago, I caught her taking photos of herself in her underwear. First, I was shocked at what sort of underwear she has for a 14 year old (lacey red g-string). Then, I saw a cell phone in her hand. I told her to get dressed and come talk to me.

She was crying before we even started to talk. I told her I’m giving her a chance to go into her gallery and delete whatever photos she took before she gives me her phone to check it. It took her several minutes to delete everything, then she gave it to me and I looked at all the photos. I asked her who she was taking them for and how she’s sending them. She said she likes a boy (16) and she sends them to him on Messenger. I asked if I would find these photos in Messenger if I go to her conversation with the boy. She begged me not to open the conversation (and I didn’t). Then I asked where she got the underwear and she said he bought it for her. I asked her if she’s having sex with him (or anyone else), she said no.

I gave her a whole lecture about what is and isn’t legal, what kind of websites her photos could end up on if the boy forwards them, why it’s weird that a 16yo boy is giving a 14yo girl a g-string as a gift and why it’s dangerous to trust anyone with your nudes. I told her about creepy old men online and revenge porn and consent and the inability to give it at 14. I told her she could ruin not only her life, but that boy’s life as well if she doesn’t stop. And I don’t feel like I’ve exaggerated much. She’s promised not to do it again, she deleted her conversation history with the boy and asked him if he could delete her photos because she’s embarrassed, but he said that he likes them and refused to do it. It is what it is.

Finally, I told her I’ll have to talk to her parents, so I spoke to her mom. Now, her mom thinks I’ve done some huge horrific mistake. She doesn’t think it’s weird sending a boy photos of your early teen body in “sexy” underwear and she thinks it’s healthy (?!) that her daughter is “in love”. She’s appalled that I told her about stuff like revenge porn, and threatened to take the kid back home sooner than we agreed unless I leave her alone to do whatever she wants. So now I look like a dickhead and my little sister is confused. I’m pretty sure she’s 1-2 conversations with her mom away from also thinking I was a mean dickhead and just continuing to send the boy her photos.

Two opposite ends of the destruction spectrum: repression (brother’s posture) and empowerment (the girl’s mom’s posture).

The productive alternative is to accept that the girl has natural desires and to help her satisfy those in a way that will bring her long-term happiness and prosperity, which is getting her married to a good man and forcing her to submit to him.

Rape will heal the world.