I guess this was bound to happen.

Frankly, I’m myself triggered by reading 1984.

It’s just difficult to process how something written nearly 75 years ago could be so accurate.

The College Fix:

In an Orwellian turn of events, the University of Northampton has put a trigger warning on George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984,” citing “explicit material” that some students may find “offensive and upsetting,” the Daily Mail reports.

The Mail verified the existence of the trigger warning through a freedom of information request filed with the UK campus.

“There’s a certain irony that students are now being issued trigger warnings before reading Nineteen Eighty-Four,” Tory MP Andrew Bridgen told the Mail. “Our university campuses are fast becoming dystopian Big Brother zones where Newspeak is practised to diminish the range of intellectual thought and cancel speakers who don’t conform to it.”

The novel “1984” was published in 1949 “as a warning against totalitarianism,” according to Britannica. “The chilling dystopia made a deep impression on readers, and [Orwell’s] ideas entered mainstream culture in a way achieved by very few books.”

“The book’s title and many of its concepts, such as Big Brother and the Thought Police, are instantly recognized and understood, often as bywords for modern social and political abuses.”

A university spokesman said told the Mail that while “it is not university policy, we may warn students of content in relation to violence, sexual violence, domestic abuse and suicide. In these circumstances we explain to applicants as part of the recruitment process that their course will include some challenging texts.”

In addition to “1984” getting a trigger warning at the University of Northampton, the UK-based Salford University has put trigger warnings on Charlotte Bronte’s “Jane Eyre” and Charles Dickens’s “Great Expectations,” which are marked as “distressing,” the Daily Mail reports:

The warnings accompany a reading list given to students on Salford’s BA English literature course, and have been revealed in response to a Freedom of Information request.

…

Not to be outdone, students in America recently took trigger warnings to a whole new level.

The student-staffed Prevention, Advocacy and Resource Center at Brandeis University last year listed the term “trigger warning” itself as “oppressive” and among those the campus community should avoid.

“The word ‘trigger’ has connections to guns for many people,” the center’s website stated. “We can give the same heads-up using language less connected to violence.”

And in 2020, Baylor University put up a trigger warning for a swath of American flags planted in the grass as a Sept. 11 memorial.

You know, they will say that 1984 was about Stalinism.

But if you read it, there are a lot of problems with that theory.

It actually seems to have been a prophecy.

Ukraine, 2014

To the credit of Defense Secretary Mark Esper, NATO has been working hard to avoid peace in Europe since 1991.

But, I thought this was one of those things you just did, not something you told people about?

Pretty bold to just come out and say it.

From the Department of Defense transcript of Defense Secretary Esper’s comments at a July, 29 press conference:

SEC. ESPER: Well, first of all, I’d say to President Trump’s credit, under his leadership, we have — we’ve seen an increase in defense spending by NATO. I think it’s over $130 billion over a few years. We have seen a few more countries join — I’ll call the 2 percent club. And that is, countries who have lived up to their Wales commitment — I think it goes back to 2016 under the previous administration — to contribute more to NATO’s collective defense.

Let’s be clear, I think Germany is the wealthiest country in Europe. Germany can and should pay more to its defense. It should certainly meet the 2 percent standard and, I would argue, go above and beyond that. And I’ve said that very publicly, I’ve said that very privately to my counterparts as well, about the importance of NATO, any alliance, sharing the burden so that we can all deter Russia and avoid peace in Europe [editor’s note. Secretary Esper intended to say “avoid conflict in Europe”].

And, again, the president’s directive in June accelerated that, and I think we are — we are excited about where we’re going and what it will mean in terms of our ability to enhance deterrence, strengthen the alliance in the process.

STAFF: All right, guys, thank you very much.

This was not one of those slips where the guy corrects himself – he just kept on talking to the end. So clearly, either he was not listening at all to the words coming out of his own mouth, or they made sense to him.

Which is worse?

Should we hope that he is just a Joe Biden type of individual and is not capable of making sense of his own speech?

Or should we assume that his brain is working fine at his age, and that this statement made sense to him?

We do have to wonder if he’s used to hearing and saying similar things in private settings within the Department of Defense.

That would explain a lot, actually.

Thank God we’ve had Donald Trump to hold back these petty, destructive agendas. He is the first president since Jimmy Carter to start exactly zero new wars or proxy wars.

I wish he would press that point harder in his re-election bid, and talk about the drone strike campaigns, color revolutions and the Libya bombing of the Obama-Biden Administration.

Killing people on the other side of the world is very unpopular, especially when you could just not do that instead. Progressive-leaning bleeding heart whites would respond well to this message, especially boomers who are old enough to have hated the Vietnam debacle.

If Biden wins, our nation will surely go back to terrorizing and looting other countries at random, and provoking Russia and China.

This does absolutely nothing for the American people. Wars of conquest made sense in feudal times, when the economy was based on land. Now, it is based on the technological capacity of a nation. All the capable people have nukes now, so the only ones that are still up for the taking are not even worth taking. It’s a waste of time.

Pettibone and Sellner banned from UK https://t.co/NnxoR3s1Hv

— Lauren Southern (@Lauren_Southern) March 10, 2018

According to Lauren Southern and others, Alt-Lite activist Brittany Pettibone and her boyfriend Generation Identitare figure Martin Sellner have been detained upon entry to the UK.

Southern and Pettibone have been riding the cock carousel doing news reporting across Europe for some months or whatever, causing various havoc.

At one point, Southern tried to torpedo a dinghy full of niggers or something I think, can’t really remember the deets on that tale, but I remember it was hardcore.

Pettibone and Sellner were scheduled to meet-up with “punch a nigger” race warrior Tommy Robinson, and apparently this is one of the reasons they were detained.

The mainstream Jewish media hasn’t reported on this yet. There are a lot of posts on Twitter about it.

Thot leader Millennial Woes got word.

The UK government is betraying the British people in the worst way imaginable: replacing them with Third World hordes, while keeping out decent Europeans like Martin Sellner and Brittany Pettibone who would warn them of what is being done to them. Treachery is not forgotten.

— Millennial Woes (@MillennialWoes) March 10, 2018

Generation Identity London did a protest.

Yesterday, Martin Sellner and Brittany Pettibone were detained by the UK government. They have declared his talk about free speech too dangerous to be heard. https://t.co/JwOgfnabva #FreeSellner #FreePettibone #SpeakersCorner pic.twitter.com/SIDV3DAFEk

— GenIdentityLondon (@GenIdenLondon) March 10, 2018

Peter Sweden got snarky.

The UK.

Cannot deport Islamic extremists.
Can deport young Conservative woman (Brittany Pettibone)

Absolute clown land. 🤡

— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) March 10, 2018

The gay Brit who called out the Jew Ezra Levant for his scammery weighed in with some deets.

Brittany Pettibone & Martin Sellner are being held in a detention centre in London. They have been there for 2 days and don't know when they will be allowed to leave. The immigration officer told Brittany she was being detained for 'planning to meet Tommy Robinson, an extremist"

— Caolan Robertson (@CaolanRob) March 10, 2018

Peter Sweden gave an update a couple hours ago saying that after two days of detainment, they are being deported.

UPDATE to the Brittany Pettibone and Martin Sellner being arrested in the UK.

Seems like they are going to be deported tomorrow.

They were detained at the airport because they were going to interview @TRobinsonNewEra according to my source.

What's going on in the UK?!?!?

— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) March 10, 2018

I’m not sure why they thought they would be allowed in the UK. No one is allowed in the UK anymore. The place is locked down.

They tried to ban the president of America and successfully banned Roosh V because he was going to give a speech about how to trick drunk bitches into sucking you off. Every major Alt-Right figure has been banned.

So I mean, whatever. The entire West is going into lockdown mode because this whole “diversity and inclusivity” thing can only work if you implement full authoritarianism. You can’t allow people to disagree or to even talk about it at all really or it stops working. People really, really hate vibrancy.

Pettibone and Southern got away with cruising for strange dick doing news reporting on YouTube in mainland Europe because they don’t speak English and people hate America and giving them trouble would draw more attention to them than just letting them do their thing.

I don’t know why they thought they could go to Britain.

It’s literally Orwell.

It’s not surveillance if you pay for it.

The year is 2070, and this is a typical day for a typical man.

George is gently brought out from his slumber by his Google wife, who tells him that breakfast is ready. The automaton watches him eating, and relays the information to the cloud in order to better tailor the ads to his food tastes – and adjust his health insurance premiums.

He’s driven to work by his Google car, which posts his location straight to his social media feed from minute to minute.

As he arrives to work, he’s called to his manager’s office. As it turns out, Google’s AI systems analysed George’s thoughts from his google brain implant and found that he’s had a 3% increase in negative thoughts about his employers this month, so they have no choice but to let him go.

George almost has a flash of anger towards his boss, but catches himself just in time. Angry thoughts towards trans-dog polykins, like his boss, was classed as a severe violation of Google Eat’s terms of service, and could see his account suspended for a month. He would starve.

Luckily, George was implanted with the Google Equilibrium chip, which helped him avoid discriminatory or otherwise insensitive thoughts. He would be able to eat this month.

Thank God for progress.

Ars Technica:

The Google Home Mini isn’t out yet, but Google is already dealing with an issue related to it.

The latest in bugman tech.

The Google mini is basically a microphone that records everything you say and sends it to Google by WiFi. It seems that some people are comfortable with such a thing, and indeed, are willing to pay for it.

In exchange for bugging your appartment, Google will convey your commands to your other home appliances, resulting in “home automation.”

Artem Russakovskii, the founder of Android Police, tells the harrowing tale of a Google Home Mini gone rogue. Russakovskii’s pre-release unit, which he picked up from Google’s October 4 event for the tech press, has apparently recorded “thousands of times a day” and attempted to respond to random noises. After swapping the device with Google, Google engineers determined that Russakovskii’s Home Mini had a defective touch panel that was registering “phantom” touch events. The Mini has a touch-sensitive surface, and, to issue a command, you can either say “OK Google” or long press on the top. Russakovskii’s unit was apparently registering touches at random, so it would randomly start recording audio of his home and storing it on Google’s servers.

Google acknowledged the issue on a support page, saying, “The Google Home team is aware of an issue impacting a small number of Google Home Mini devices that could cause the touch-control mechanism to behave incorrectly. We immediately rolled out a software update on October 7 to mitigate the issue.”

For now, Google’s “mitigation” to the issue has been to update to all Google Home Minis to totally disable the “long-press to talk” functionality. The company also says it “removed any activity/queries that were created by long-pressing the top of a Google Home Mini between October 4 and October 7, when the software update was rolled out.”

Google says the people affected are those “who received an early release Google Home Mini device at recent Made by Google events.” “Made By Google” events presumably don’t just cover the press event; they also cover the pre-release giveaways that have been occurring at pop-up stores across the US and Canada. The Google Home Mini won’t officially hit store shelves until October 19th.

From reading this, you’d think that once they fix the “bug,” the gadget won’t be recording you 24/7.

Guess again.

If the machine wasn’t constantly recording, how could it tell when you start asking it for something? It would be technically impossible. Moreover, the Google voice recognition engine is cloud-based. The only question is, how much of the information is it sending to Google’s servers, and what is Google doing with that info?

I’m guessing Google is pretty much going to monetize everything. You can look forward to seeing YouTube ads related to the things you whispered in your girlfriend’s ear the previous night.

Why are all these bugmen so eager to set up networked surveillance microphones in their homes, just so they don’t have to flick their light switches manually?

Nothing will stand in the way of greater convenience – not even a totalitarian police state! -Bugmen

Proud to contribute to the @YouTube Trusted Flaggers Program working to make the internet a safe space for all: https://t.co/Wm9p68pVuF

— ADL (@ADL_National) August 1, 2017

Jews are gaining ground on the conspiracy to control what can and cannot be said on the internet. Youtube has been shutting down all opinions that aren’t sanctioned by Jews for years, but now they are literally putting the Anti-Defamation League in charge of moderation.

It doesn’t hurt that the handful of growing monopolies on Silicon Valley are largely run by Jews who share the ADL’s political ambitions.

USA Today:

Technology and more human eyeballs are helping YouTube more quickly find and remove terrorist content from the video-sharing site.

Last month, YouTube said it was initiating a multipronged strategy to combat how extremist groups including ISIS use video on the site to recruit and radicalize prospective terrorists.

Machine learning has helped the YouTube detect and remove controversial content more quickly, the company said Tuesday in a blog post. Over the past month, three-fourths of the violent or extremist videos removed were taken down before a person on YouTube flagged it for inappropriateness. “Systems have proven more accurate than humans at flagging videos that need to be removed,” the YouTube team says in the post.

As YouTube deployed machine learning technology over the past month, the number of videos removed has more than doubled, as has the rate of removal. “With over 400 hours of content uploaded to YouTube every minute, finding and taking action on violent extremist content poses a significant challenge,” YouTube says.

The site’s program of “Trusted Flaggers,” human experts who help spot problem videos, has been bolstered by cooperation from 15 more non-governmental organizations including the Anti-Defamation League, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.

New standards will be applied to videos that are not illegal but users have flagged by users “as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism,” YouTube says. Those videos may remain on the site, but will not be recommended, make money from ads or have comments. “We’ll begin to roll this new treatment out to videos on desktop versions of YouTube in the coming weeks, and will bring it to mobile experiences soon thereafter,” the company says.

Less than two weeks ago, YouTube began redirecting searches for extremist and terrorist words to a playlist of antiterrorist content.

So you search “gas the kikes” and you get a video about how a Jew woman swallowed diamonds and managed to walk backwards out of a gas chamber.

YouTube’s Creators for Change program last week hosted a two-day workshop in the U.K. for teens to “help them find a positive sense of belonging online and learn skills on how to participate safely and responsibly on the internet,” YouTube says. It also plans to expand that program to reach 20,000 more U.K. teens across.

Jews such as Lisa Feldman Barrett and Elizabeth Dwoskin like to use the grievances of black people as an alibi for moving the needle towards censoring and criminalizing “hate speech” (even though blacks seldom author articles towards this end).

Another angle they like to take is shutting down nationalist, alt-right and even average (social) conservative discourse under the guise of “fighting terrorism.” This is the slop they feed the lower IQ conservatives slowly boiling in hot water to stop them from reacting. But too many Goyim know at this point.

On Youtube’s blog, you can gauge a better sense of what they’re doing than this disingenuous USA Today report. Here are some tidbits, including plans to shut down content that doesn’t even violate Youtube’s already stringent anti-speech rules.

More experts: Of course, our systems are only as good as the the data they’re based on. Over the past weeks, we have begun working with more than 15 additional expert NGOs and institutions through our Trusted Flagger program, including the Anti-Defamation League, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. These organizations bring expert knowledge of complex issues like hate speech, radicalization, and terrorism that will help us better identify content that is being used to radicalize and recruit extremists. We will also regularly consult these experts as we update our policies to reflect new trends. And we’ll continue to add more organizations to our network of advisors over time.

Tougher standards: We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes. We’ll begin to roll this new treatment out to videos on desktop versions of YouTube in the coming weeks, and will bring it to mobile experiences soon thereafter. These new approaches entail significant new internal tools and processes, and will take time to fully implement.

Early intervention and expanding counter-extremism work: We’ve started rolling out features from Jigsaw’s Redirect Method to YouTube. When people search for sensitive keywords on YouTube, they will be redirected towards a playlist of curated YouTube videos that directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages. We also continue to amplify YouTube voices speaking out against hate and radicalization through our YouTube Creators for Change program. Just last week, the U.K. chapter of Creators for Change, Internet Citizens, hosted a two-day workshop for 13-18 year-olds to help them find a positive sense of belonging online and learn skills on how to participate safely and responsibly on the internet. We also pledged to expand the program’s reach to 20,000 more teens across the U.K.

So in other words, they’re going to artificially promote unpopular SJW content creators while censoring everybody else. Conservative content creators who pride themselves in being intellectual and non-racist like Sargon of Akkad, members of the “Atheist Skeptic” community who ask too many questions, and even Judetube’s #1 channel PewDiePie are all going to be monitored around the clock and at the sudden whims of the Anti-Defamation League!

The ADL is also joined by 15 other groups on the council of censors, but only a few have been named in press releases. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue is run by the Jew Sasha Havlicek, who is related to the 19th century Jewish composer Gustav Mahler.

The other group, the “No Hate Speech Movement,” is a government surveillance and indoctrination program run by the Angela Merkel regime and its vassals in Brussels. So in other words, the international Jew and the European Union get to decide what people in America and beyond can and cannot see.

What is sorely needed right now is an independent video hosting program, akin to the backlash of alternatives to anti-speech Patreon (whose top investor is (((Jared’s))) brother Joshua Kushner at Thrive Capital) that are cropping up and making money-chasing leftist Jack Conte incontinent.

The problem is people who try and venture towards this end up selling out, including the founders of Reddit. I can see why some Jew offering you unimaginable millions of dollars for your dinky little start-up or content hosting site is hard to turn down, but we need someone with extraordinary principle to step in to save the world from these freedom-hating kikes.

Jews are incompatible with Western civilization. They don’t play well with non-Jews. As people become more and more dependent on public utilities in their hands like Facebook and Google, the constitutional protections for political debate may soon become irrelevant.

As for the people who blame Islam, “suicidal liberals,” or the all-powerful “Clinton mafia” when incidents like this transpire: you have no choice but to name and struggle against the actual tyrants. You may think shilling for Israel will keep your freedom and livelihood safe, but this isn’t a joke anymore – they will come for you too. 

Yes, even you, Three Names.

O’Brien was looking down at Winston gravely and rather sadly. His face, seen from below, looked coarse and worn, with pouches under the eyes and tired lines from nose to chin. He was older than Winston had thought him; he was perhaps forty-eight or fifty. Under his hand there was a dial with a lever on top and figures running round the face.

“I told you,” said O’Brien, “that if we met again it would be here.”

“Yes,” said Winston.

Without any warning except a slight movement of O’Brien’s hand, a wave of pain flooded Winston’s body. It was a frightening pain, because he could not see what was happening, and he had the feeling that some mortal injury was being done to him. He did not know whether the thing was really happening, or whether the effect was electrically produced; but his body was being wrenched out of shape, the joints were being slowly torn apart. Although the pain had brought the sweat out on his forehead, the worst of all was the fear that his backbone was about to snap. He set his teeth and breathed hard through his nose, trying to keep silent as long as possible.

“Do you remember,” he went on, “writing in your diary, ‘Freedom is the freedom to say that niggers are the bubonic plague of mankind’?”

“Yes,” said Winston.

O’Brien held up a photo in his left hand. Though yellowed by time, the photo’s image was clear: a semi-naked Negro standing beside a hut made of pure animal dung.

“What is the average IQ of a Black man from Equatorial Guinea, Winston?”

“Fifty-nine.”

“And if the Jews say that it is not fifty-nine but one-hundred and forty – then what is it?”

“Fifty-nine.”

The word ended in a gasp of pain. The needle of the dial had shot up to fifty-five. The sweat had sprung out all over Winston’s body. The air tore into his lungs and issued again in deep groans which even by clenching his teeth he could not stop. O’Brien watched him, his hand still holding the photo.

He drew back the lever. This time the pain was only slightly eased.

“What is the IQ of this gentleman from Equatorial Guinea, Winston?” O’Brien said, moving the photo closer to Winston’s face.

“Fifty-nine.”

The needle went up to sixty.

“What is his IQ, Winston?”

“Fifty-nine! Fifty-nine! What else can I say? Fifty-nine!”

The needle must have risen again, but Winston did not look at it. The heavy, stern face of O’Brien and the photograph of the grinning Negro filled his gaze. As Winston’s vision continued to blur and vibrate, the Negro did momentarily seem more intelligent – he appeared to be wearing a tuxedo and clutching a well-worn copy of Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra – but Winston’s senses eventually re-asserted themselves, and reality returned to the fore.

“What is his IQ, Winston?”

“Fifty-nine! Stop it, stop it! How can you go on? Fifty-nine! Fifty-nine!”

“What is his IQ, Winston?”

“One-hundred and forty! One-hundred and forty! One-hundred and forty!”

“No, Winston, that is no use. You are lying. You still think it is fifty-nine. What is his IQ, please?”

“Fifty-nine! One-hundred and forty! Fifty-nine! Anything you like. Only stop it, stop the pain!”

Abruptly he was sitting up with O’Brien’s arm round his shoulders. He had perhaps lost consciousness for a few seconds. The bonds that had held his body down were loosened. He felt very cold, he was shaking uncontrollably, his teeth were chattering, the tears were rolling down his cheeks. For a moment he clung to O’Brien like a baby, curiously comforted by the heavy arm round his shoulders. He had the feeling that O’Brien was his protector, that the pain was something that came from outside, from some other source, and that it was O’Brien who would save him from it.

“You are a slow learner, Winston,” said O’Brien gently.

“How can I help it?” he blubbered. “How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? That monkey’s forehead is less than an inch high, for heaven’s sake! His IQ is clearly in the fifties – at most.”

“Never, Winston. Never is it low. Sometimes it is one-hundred and forty. Sometimes it is one-hundred and seventy-five. But a gentleman of color’s intelligence is always high – and always superior to that of a White devil. You must try harder to understand.”

O’Brien laid Winston down on the bed. The grip of his limbs tightened again, but the pain had ebbed away and the trembling had stopped, leaving him merely weak and cold.

“Reality is not external,” O’Brien began. “Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Jewish tribe, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Jews hold to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Jews. That is the fact that you have got to relearn, Winston. It needs an act of self-destruction, an effort of the will. You must humble yourself before you can become a good goy.”

O’Brien turned to face Winston directly. His features appeared sharper and more intense than before, as if seized by a burst of impassioned malevolence.

“If you want a picture of the future, Winston, imagine an obese sheboon twerking atop the ruins of White civilization – forever.”

What a disgusting Orwellian nation Britain is.

Arrested for funny stickers. Because your funny stickers could inspire others to feel the emotion on hate. And if people feel the emotion of hate, you’re just one step away from gassing a bunch of ratfaced Jews in fake shower rooms.

That is what liberals actually believe.

Who knows.

Maybe they’re right.

The Sun:

Cops have arrested a man after a series of “appallingly racist” fake Pokémon stickers appeared at London Tube stations and bus stops.

The stickers, created under the name “Pakémon”, copy the popular game which sees kids swap and collect different creatures for points.

Far from the innocent game we’ve come to know and love, the Pakémon stickers depict a number of high profile Muslims, including the Mayor of London, who is described as “the most dangerous Pakémon”.

The stickers are even branded with a version of the infamous Pokémon slogan, “gotta catch ’em all”, but it doesn’t end there.

Altering the tagline, the maker also threatens to “deport them all”.

The 46-year-old, from Sutton, south London, was taken into custody on Thursday on suspicion of inciting racial hatred

One version of the sticker with an image of Sadiq Khan emblazoned on it, reads: “He believes that Londoners should learn to accept Islamic terrorism while he is mayor.”

The maker offers collectors “200 Terror Points” for the sticker of Khan, who is dubbed “Hamaskhan”.

…

A 29-year-old unnamed man was first to share an image of two of the “appallingly racist” stickers he found at Borough Tube station to his social media account.

He told the Evening Standard: “I felt disgusted and very disappointed that we now live in a Britain where some people feel empowered or protected to do this.

“They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it.”

Someone has to stop these humorous Japanese cartoon related stickers!

We can’t let this go unpunished!

British Transport Police say they are in the process of “thoroughly” investigating the stickers.

A spokesperson urged London commuters to share any further sightings of the posters to raise awareness.

…

Speaking on the posters, Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, said: “Hate crime, in all its shapes and forms, will not be tolerated in London and there is absolutely no place for these abhorrent stickers anywhere in our city.”

Can someone please make and distribute more of these stickers?

Don’t do anything illegal, of course, but it seems that making and distributing them is not illegal.

They’re really awesome.

Black Pigeon Speaks.

The solution to opposition to multiculturalism is to completely ban freedom.

This is a fantastic introductory video to vibrant diversity, share it with the normies.

Judge Patricia Lynch

John Hennigan

We have invited animals into our countries to rule over us. And they are brutal, pitiless creatures.

In America, we have an African monkey ruler openly inciting violence against our police, condemning our people and our history on a daily basis, enacting policies intended to exterminate us.

In Britain, you get 18 months in prison for making a rude comment to one of these monkeys.

The Telegraph:

John Hennigan, 50, was involved in a slanging match with Judge Patricia Lynch QC at Chelmsford Crown Court on Wednesday.

Hennigan was being sentenced for breaching an Asbo by using racist language towards a Caribbean woman and her two young children when he said she was a “bit of a c—“.

Judge Lynch replied: “You are a bit of a c— yourself.” When Hennigan shouted back: “Go f— yourself”, the judge replied: “You too.”

He reportedly shouted “Sieg Heil” and banged the glass panel of the dock as he was jailed for 18 months.

Hennigan was in breach of an Asbo imposed in 2005 when a swastika was discovered daubed on the front door of his council house.

An “Abso” is an “anti-social behavioral order.”

It’s a concept introduced by the Blair government in 1998, which allows for non-criminal offenses to be treated as criminal. Basically, it outlaws hurting people’s feelings.

Prosecutor Lynne Shirley told the court that Tanisha Ford, a black Caribbean woman and her two children, aged eight and six and also black Caribbean, were in Market Square, Harlow.

She had recently moved to the town and was looking for a shop.

“She noticed the defendant waving at her,” she said. “She approached him and he asked her if she was looking for a toilet. She said no, looking for Slimming World.

“He gave her directions. It seemed a normal conversation and she walked off but as she did Hennigan said ‘I don’t agree with inter-racial relationships. I like natural’.

“She was shocked and surprised and asked what he meant. He said ‘I prefer white children’. She was shocked further. She said her children were natural and he said ‘I’m just saying’,” said the prosecutor.

“The incident made her feel very upset, hurt, out of place and distressed. It’s not the first time she’s been racially abused and it brought back unpleasant memories,” said Miss Shirley. “She was alarmed her children had to listen to the comments.”

The poor widdle dears.

Ms Ford decided to call police. Hennigan was identified and while he was in custody officers found comments he made “very unpleasant,” the court heard.

…

Judge Lynch told Hennigan: “Your offence is thoroughly unpleasant and repeated breaches of this order using the most unpleasant of language and causing distress.

“It’s said custody would be distressing for you but it seems you never learn. This is the ninth time you have breached this order, the same offensive, racist comments and you don’t deserve another chance.”

It was at this point that Hennigan began talking directly to the judge. He said he hadn’t intentionally abused anyone “whatever you think”.

Judge Lynch disagreed. She told him: “No one cares what you think.” Hennigan responded: “I know they don’t, that’s why I’ve not had any help for years.”

Judge Lynch said she was not going to argue with him and was sending him straight to prison. It was then that Hennigan began swearing at her.

He had been hauled before an Old Bailey judge in October 2012 for making Nazi salutes at a pub in Bishopsgate in the City of London.

The very concept of inviting in a foreign people and allowing them to sentence us to prison is unfathomable. Abject lunacy. But allowing a Black female judge to sentence a White man to prison for saying something rude to a Black female – this is theatre of the absurd.

History will remember this as the darkest age of mankind, when a collective insanity infected us and we went to war with ourselves in the name of foreign groups.

That is, if we win history will remember it that way. If the planet goes Black, there will be no more history.

Australia has cancelled its brilliant plan to do away with the George Orwell hate speech laws, which make it a crime to question the filthy Jews or their shades-of-brown fighting comrades.

A Jew-defending op-ed published in the Business Spectator gives us the inside scoop:

So the commitment to either repeal or seriously water down section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act has been abandoned by the government. The announcement was made by Tony Abbott, who said he had made a “leadership” call. In other words, he did not consult Attorney-General George Brandis before he made the announcement.

It clearly represents a broken promise, especially to some of his closest supporters, including the columnist Andrew Bolt and the recently appointed Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson. They will be deeply disappointed by this decision.

While Abbott said that the decision to ditch the plan to rid the Racial Discrimination Act of section 18C was taken because of “complications” in dealing with Islamic communities in the context of the proposed tough new terrorism laws, it seems likely that more was involved in this decision.

The conflict in Gaza and the coverage and reaction to this appalling, heartbreaking conflagration, in my opinion, made it virtually certain that any move to change or abolish section 18C would extract too high a political price.

The repeal of section 18C was vigorously opposed by the leadership of virtually every ethnic community in the country. But it would be fair to say — without wishing to give succour to those who reckon the Jews are too powerful — that Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organising the opposition to any potential change to the RDA.

It is the opposition of the Jewish communal leaders that had been of major concern to Brandis and, to a significant extent, Tony Abbott. Why is that? Australian Jews after all represent just a tiny fraction of the Australian population. There are at best two seats — one in Melbourne and one in Sydney — in which the Jewish vote might matter, but even then there is absolutely no evidence that Jewish people vote mainly, or even significantly, on the basis of ‘Jewish issues’.

Now you may be one of those who believe that there is a secret cabal of Jews who control Australia — its financial institutions, the media companies, the professions, the courts — and if you are one of these people, there’s no point in talking to you. Read no further please.

The main reason that Brandis and Abbott were most concerned about the opposition of the Jewish communal leadership to any changes to section 18C is because the Jewish community is generally seen as a role model for successful multiculturalism.

Huh. Interesting reasoning to explain away the total Jew control of the Australian government, buddy.

Last year, the parasite Jews occupying Australia came together with various other groups of occupying parasites to denounce the proposed amendments to the Orwellian “hate speech” laws of the nation.

Multiple roof bodies of non-White bloodsuckers issued a statement whining about the proposed amendments to the RDA, which would possibly result in a new batch of lampshades and soap being made out of the Jews, and may create a situation where brown people are unable to stop crying – even while they sleep – due to their level of hurt feelings well surpassing the 9000 mark.

Australian Jewish News:

“Without Section 18C, the Jewish community would lose a powerful weapon that has been used successfully many times to take action against anti-Semitism, including Holocaust denial, usually without having to go to court,” Executive Council of Australian Jewry executive director Peter Wertheim, who is a signatory, told The AJN this week.

The statement was also signed by leaders from the Arab Council Australia, the Australian Hellenic Council, the National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples, the Chinese Australian Forum, the Lebanese Muslim Association, the Vietnamese Community in Australia, the Armenian National Council of Australia, the United Muslim Women’s Association, and activist group All Together Now.

…

“This issue has been falsely framed as one of freedom of expression,” Wertheim said.

“To include racist name-calling within the rubric of freedom of expression is a debasement of ­freedom … and [people’s] human dignity.”

Wertheim said he and other leaders were disappointed and “felt let down” by the Abbott government’s lack of consultation about changes to the RDA.

The statement asserts 18C’s repeal “would be a step backwards for Australia” as “racial vilification deprives its targets of equal treatment and a fair go”.

Wow, punishing people for Holocaust denial without going to court.  God bless freedom.

Of course, the purpose of speech laws is to protect the Jews. They have no other purpose. They are designed to make it illegal to question Jewish power and Jewish lies.

The Holocaust didn’t happen. It is a completely idiotic lie. So it has nothing to do with hate or hurt feelings.

However, the Jews are able to rally the hordes of non-Whites around them to support these hate laws, and thus give the impression that this is about protecting the feelings of poor, stupid brown people who like pre-school children will start crying if someone says something that hurts their feelings.

Interesting to note: it really speaks to the actual instinctual view of these people that Whites support laws that will protect their feelings. It shows that even the liberals do believe, on a subconscious level that these people are pathetic, lesser humans. If they really wore exactly the same as us, surely they would have the emotional capacity to man-up and not start crying when someone says something that hurts their feelings.

On another level, the non-Whites who support this also realize along with the Jews that if Whites are allowed to question their sickening presence in our countries even a little bit, we will rally in the streets with pitchforks torches and send them back to whatever hell they came from.

But of course, it must be framed as “muh feelings” for goyim consumption.