Have you ever in your life seen a woman fishing?

The answer is “no.” I can just answer the question for you.

Women have no interest in fishing. They have great interest in forcing themselves into areas where they are not invited.

The Independent:

Britain’s oldest fly-fishing club is facing mounting pressure from campaigners to admit women for the first time in its history.

The FlyFishers’ Club was established in 1884 and currently has around 600 male members – with King Charles as a patron.

While it has strictly been gentleman’s only in its 193-year history, there have been calls in recent weeks for change as female anglers fight for the club to be more inclusive.

Marina Gibson, a fly fishing instructor and guide, said she would “absolutely love” to join the club and called for them to embrace change.

She said during an event at the Hay Festival: “I don’t go to London that often but if I did, I would just love to go and sit and read a book and talk about fishing to other fishermen.

“I think a lot of people have a difficult time with change and I completely understand that people want to keep it as it is, but I think that there are so many really hardcore women anglers out there and they would all love a chance to go and sit there at lunchtime – because we’re not allowed in at lunch – and just chill.”

Her statement came weeks after the renowned Garrick Club voted to allow female members for the first time since 1831.

CUCKS!

Ms Gibson echoed another campaigner, Lucy Mantle, chairman and co-founder of the City Flickers fly-fishing organisation, who wrote an open letter to the club’s president earlier this month.

The open letter posted on Instagram reads: “In light of the recent press reports on the Garrick Club, I thought the timing might be right to raise my concerns.

“I am of course aware that the club was founded in 1884 as a ‘gentlemen’s club for fly fishers’, but it now seems increasingly anachronistic and archaic to continue to ban women given the vast societal changes that have occurred.

“There are many of us – both men and women – who view the policy as indefensible, unsustainable and, above all, unwise for a whole series of reasons.”

She added: “Whatever the fears of some members, I can confidently assert that, although we may sometimes wear colourful dresses, most women anglers… know how to behave.”

She signed off: “I am sure this issue has arisen on several previous occasions. But, as the Garrick experience has shown, it won’t go away and momentum is building. Please help do the right thing. And yes, I would have liked to join.”

Join and do what?

You’re not going to fish.

I know that, you know that, we all know that.

You want to join and start manipulating the male members and turning them against each other in order to get attention focused on yourself.

We all know how this works now, women. It’s not a secret anymore.

Everyone knows.

And we are already putting together plans to make Western nations into nations modeled on the Taliban.

Islam is right about women

This article is from May 8th.

But I thought it was important, since we missed it at the time, and we just had the fishing club invasion.

See: UK: Biofrontholes Now Nagging Oldest All-Male Fishermen’s Club to Let Them In

Women are gong through and systematically injecting themselves into every male space in Britain, so they can turn it into a fiasco where all of the attention is focused on them.

Women are not interested in anything other than attention. Even the things they are interested in, like fashion, are only about getting attention on themselves.

BBC:

Members of the Garrick Club have voted to allow women to join the institution.

The all-male private members’ club, which was founded in 1831, had been under pressure to admit female members.

On Tuesday members of the club, in London’s West End, voted to allow women to join after reconsidering the legal wording surrounding membership.

The head of the Civil Service Simon Case and the chief of MI6 Richard Moore recently resigned from the club after its membership list was revealed.

The vote was passed, with nearly 60% in favour. The Garrick has been contacted for comment.

Some of the cucks already have a list of some biofrontholes they plan to invite. Mary Beard is that old fat historian slut that keeps pushing the diversity in ancient Rome line.

The vote confirming the resolution required a 50% majority, although previous votes on the question of female membership had required a two-thirds majority.

Analysis of the club’s rules by senior judges concluded there was nothing in the Garrick’s constitution preventing women from being allowed to join, because the 1925 Law of Property Act advises that in legal documents the word “he” should also be read to mean “she”.

Men and women need private spaces.

You see how even liberal women are flipping out about trannies.

All the trannies are doing is proving the point.

No man ever complained about this

They actually expect you to believe that the only reason male-only spaces ever existed was because men held an irrational hatred of women, for no reason.

Has that been your experience?

Like, if you’re hanging out with a group of male friends, and a woman shows up, is the change in social dynamic driven primarily by irrational hatred, or something very much more obvious and biological?

The Guardian:

Mild signs of a potential willingness to modernise have been observed in some of central London’s establishment clubs in the past few weeks, led by the announcement that, after a wait of 166 years, women will finally be allowed to become members of Pratt’s.

The decision by the owner of Pratt’s has been met mostly with resigned acceptance by the club’s membership, which includes at least a dozen MPs, and has triggered renewed discussion of possible reform at the remaining hardcore handful of gentlemen’s clubs that refuse to admit women.

Members of the Beefsteak, another men-only dining club joined by MPs, actors and judges, believe it is now likely it will also be obliged to change its rules to admit women. A renewed drive by female campaigners was launched last week to persuade members of the Garrick, including Michael Gove and the actors Benedict Cumberbatch and Hugh Bonneville, to allow women to join.

The ironically named Amelia Gentleman, author of this article

Meanwhile, at the Athenaeum (which has allowed women as members since 2002) an organised movement by about 70 members to block further modernising changes was rejected at last Monday’s annual general meeting, with an intervention from Theresa May, who shut down discussion of a series of motions aimed at preserving the club’s “traditional ethos”.

The need for reform is being felt at many of London’s Pall Mall clubs, despite their reputation as outposts of an unchanging Britain frozen somewhere in the 1950s, partly because rising food and energy prices have brought cost of living issues to the attention of members of clubs located in old, draughty buildings with high overheads.

Changes at Pratt’s – where the current and former Conservative MPs Kwasi Kwarteng, Nicholas Soames and Hugo Swire are members – were brought in “with immediate effect” by the club’s owner, the Earl of Burlington, William Cavendish, without consultation in late May. However, there will probably not be any perceptible change to membership in the near future, because the process of proposing and seconding new members takes considerable time, requiring 25 people to support a nomination by writing their names in a book in the club and later committee approval.

“There has been chuntering, people saying, hmm we don’t like this, complaining that they weren’t consulted,” a Pratt’s member said, but he added that younger members were beginning to feel belatedly that the status quo was indefensible. “There’s a feeling that the legal grounds for these places to be all male is quite shaky.”

Emily Bendell, the founder of a clothes business who has been campaigning for the Garrick to change its rules to admit women, wrote last week to a handful of the club’s most prominent members, noting that eight years had passed since 50.5% of the club’s membership voted in favour of women members, a vote that fell short of the required two-thirds majority needed for rule change. “A second vote is long overdue,” she wrote.

“I’m sure you would not be a member of a club that excluded members on the basis of race, religion or sexuality, so we urge you to call for a new vote to allow female members at the Garrick.”

Her campaign has been met with bemusement by some (mostly male) commentators who question the need to fight for equality at a tiny group of elite institutions, but she argues that the existence of men-only clubs that have senior male lawyers and politicians as members “negatively impacts women’s professional advancement”.

Yes.

Any single place where women are banned is a threat to all women, everywhere.

It’s the exact same way that Jews think, actually – because Jews are an embodiment of the feminine spirit.