The “gender pay gap” is the dumbest hoax at all. At least it was before this drone hoax.

Women have never been paid less because they were women. Women make less on average because they work less. So what women demand is that they get paid more for less work.

This is like when the US women’s national soccer team demanded equal pay to the men’s team, despite the fact that they make less than 1% of the money the men’s team makes.

Women do not understand anything other than “give me.”

They are much worse than niggers in this regard, and in fact, are more like Jews.

Gript:

The managing director of Bord Gáis has expressed “delight” at the fact that the company now has a gender pay gap “in favour of women”, and he hailed the fact that the women now outnumber men in the organisation’s management team.

“Bord Gáis Energy has published its Gender Pay Gap Report for 2024 which shows a -2% median gender pay gap in favour of women, and a mean gender pay gap of -1.7% in favour of women,” the company said in a statement.

See? They just say they deserve more because they have vaginas.

We’ve all seen it: “I deserve better.” This is the credo of ALL women (yes ALL women).

“A strong driver of the company’s performance on gender pay has been the increase in the number of women in senior management roles in the last two years.

“In 2022, Bord Gáis Energy set a goal of having at least 40% women in senior roles on both the executive team and the wider senior management group.

Rest assured, they also support anal

“The company has now exceeded that target, with 44% of senior roles now being held by women while representation on the executive team grew to 60% in 2024.”

Speaking about the 2024 report, Kerry McConnell, CFO at Bord Gáis Energy, said the company was “pleased with the progress we have made.”

“However, we are not complacent about either gender balance or other areas of diversity among our colleagues, and will continue to build towards parity and inclusion at all levels,” she said.

“We know, for example, that we need to encourage more women into the engineering and technician roles at Bord Gáis, as these are areas that have been more traditionally male in the past. We have set a goal of 30% of apprentice roles to be filled by women by 2030, up from its current 19%.

…

Meanwhile, the company’s Managing Director Dave Kirwan, said he was “delighted” with the results.

“I am delighted to report that our median pay gap is close to parity this year at -2.0% in favour of women,” he said, adding: “In particular, we are determined to attract more women into roles traditionally held by men, including trades. We’ve set a goal of 30% of apprentice roles filled by women by 2030. Today, the proportion is 19% and we are working to improve this area of our business in 2025.”

Does anyone think women are better at these jobs?

Does anyone think women are better at anything?

Do you notice that gay is very popular now? Do you know why? Because so many men figured out that men are better at blowjobs.

Here’s some Science for you, silly goyim

Every time I hear about a woman saying something, I think “this bitch deserves to be duct-taped, thrown in the truck of a Toyota, taken out to a field and gang-raped, then buried in a shallow grave.”

I really don’t know that there is anything a woman can say that won’t make me think that is what should happen to her.

Reuters:

The gender pay gap at some of Australia’s top corporations including Commonwealth Bank (CBA.AX), opens new tab, national carrier Qantas (QAN.AX), opens new tab and oil and gas explorer Woodside (WDS.AX), opens new tab is bigger than the national average of 19%, new data showed on Tuesday.

The government released for the first time data on gender pay gaps at firms with more than 100 employees, following legislation passed in March 2023 that forced them to reveal the pay of male and female employees.

The report exposes the yawning gulf between what men and women earn at some of Australia’s biggest employers despite years of commentary from governments and corporations about closing the gender pay gap.

The median total remuneration gap for 2022/23 was 19% in favour of men, while the difference in median base pay was 14.5% and in average total pay it was 21.7%, the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) said.

Only one-third of companies had a median gender pay gap between the target range of -5% and +5%.

“There is a substantial problem in this country when you’ve got essentially two thirds of businesses with a gender pay gap in favour of men,” Minister for Women Katy Gallagher told reporters.

“It’s not about shaming, it’s not about naming, it’s not about saying men should be paid less. It’s about driving that change that we need to see in organisations to make sure that women are getting a fair crack at opportunity and that we are closing the gender pay gap over time,” Gallagher said.

Australia’s top banks and energy firms were some of the biggest laggards in gender pay parity.

The pay gap is proven to be a hoax, over and over again, by every single study, every metric.

Women don’t work as much, they don’t work as hard, they take time off. The pay gap is because they do a lot less work. They get paid way more than they should.

The market exists. You can’t just pay people for work they’re not doing because they have sickening, stinking gooey holes between their legs.

I hate everything.

Everything is a lie.

There is no truth anywhere.

We are literally living in hell.

The Pope is promoting fisting small boys at the church.

What happens now?

When is God going to start killing people with fire?

What an ugly bitch

WOMEN DO LESS WORK THAN MEN!

THEY GET PAID MORE THAN MEN FOR THE WORK THEY DO!

Reuters:

Women in Germany earned 18% less on average than men last year, due largely to a levelling-off in earnings after having children and taking part-time work, the Federal Statistics Office said on Thursday.

The data show that the gender pay gap in Europe’s biggest economy has remained unchanged since 2020. That is down from 23% when records started in 2006.

On an adjusted basis, the gender pay gap for 2023 was 6%, said the office.

Women’s earnings start to stagnate from the age of 30 years, the average age for women to have their first child in Germany, said the office, while men continue to earn more.

The pay gap is the fakest thing since the Holocaust.

It’s too much.

Too much!

OWNED.

Former Australian senator David Leyonhjelm destroys Gender Pay Gap activists.

When people argue for these principles – 99% of the time the data they are using is either intentionally misrepresented or not properly collected and conveyed.

There are lies, damn lies,… pic.twitter.com/Xp96q6UoJC

— American Archer (@CalenArcher) January 15, 2024

Apparently, they’ve caught onto the fact that people think this race/sex stuff is unfair.

So they’re allowing reverse lawsuits.

Daily Mail:

Two middle-aged white male creatives at a top advertising agency have won a sex discrimination claim after a female director vowed to ‘obliterate’ its Mad Men reputation of being full of straight, white men.

Chas Bayfield and Dave Jenner, both in their fifties and renowned creative directors at J. Walter Thompson (JWT), were among five men axed from the leading ad agency because bosses ‘urgently’ wanted to address its poor gender pay gap.

A damning gender pay gap report had sent ‘shock waves’ through the firm as it highlighted there was a serious lack of female representation, a tribunal heard.

Female creative director Jo Wallace was appointed to help lose the company’s ‘Knightsbridge Boys Club’ reputation and jointly held a diversity conference called ‘Crisis: The Mother of All Change’.

Ms Wallace, who introduced herself as a gay woman, told the conference: ‘One thing we all agree on is that the reputation JWT once earnt – as being full of white, British, privileged [men] – has to be obliterated.’

When Mr Bayfield and Mr Jenner expressed ‘valid’ concerns over the safety of their jobs, bosses reacted ‘furiously’ and took it as a ‘challenge’ to their new diversity drive, then made them redundant.

They were let go after a meeting with the company and were told to leave.

Companies can hire from under-represented communities, but cannot fire employees for race or discrimination.

Now the pair, who were behind some hugely successful TV adverts, have successfully sued Wunderman Thompson – which merged with JWT – for sex discrimination.

A judge ruled that JWT bosses unfairly got ‘rid’ of Mr Bayfield and Mr Jenner, 52 and 50 at the time, because it ‘immediately assisted the gender pay gap issue’.

The London Central tribunal heard both men are straight, white and British. Their work regularly received praise from colleagues and industry peers.

…

Mr Bayfield today said since his dismissal he has struggled to find work and Mr Jenner has left advertising, adding that they have been perceived as ‘whistle-blowers’ in the industry.

They can try to say “look, everyone is getting sued and punished for discrimination.”

But the basic fact of reality is that 99.9999% of cases will involve women taking over. Every single company in the Western world is filled with completely useless women who do nothing.

These companies run by women would go under if they weren’t supported by the government and the criminal oligarchy (which was established by the government, who refused to enforce laws against monopolies).

Every single job on earth is done better by men, and we’re now finding out with the tranny phenomenon that men are actually better at being women.

Frankly, if we just had a real meritocracy, where the government didn’t force people to hire women and colorfuls, everything would balance itself back out. Women would be competing for work with 85 IQ immigrants, and they would therefore oppose immigration on the grounds that they’re being beat by Paco.

This is what happens when you allow women to do stuff.

Even if you let them have their way and participate, they’ll complain about whatever and use it as an excuse to spread as much destruction as they possibly can.

AP:

Players on the U.S. women’s national team are seeking more than $66 million in damages as part of their gender discrimination lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation.

The damages were included in slew of papers filed Thursday night in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles ahead of a trial scheduled to start May 5.

Among the documents filed were the separate collective bargaining agreements of the U.S. men’s and women’s teams, which had not previously been made public.

Players on the women’s national team sued the federation last March alleging institutionalized gender discrimination that includes inequitable compensation between the men’s and women’s teams.

The core idea behind this is that women are deliberately locked out of their rightful earnings because evil men are taking their money through some kind of vague patriarchal mechanism of oppression.

They sometimes refer to that imaginary mechanism as “the glass ceiling” because, quite conveniently, no one can see it and no one knows exactly where it is, but they allege that it is somewhere and that it is stopping women from reaching the heights that men reach.

Each side in the class-action lawsuit asked for a summary judgment in their favor. The estimate of damages, including interest, was provided by Finnie Bevin Cook, an economist from Deiter Consulting Group, which was retained by the suing players.

The collective bargaining agreements showed a disparity in bonuses but also highlighted the different pay structures between the two teams.

“Women’s national team players are paid differently because they specifically asked for and negotiated a completely different contract than the men’s national team, despite being offered, and rejecting, a similar pay-to-play agreement during the past negotiations,” U.S. Soccer said in a statement. “Their preference was a contract that provides significant additional benefits that the men’s national team does not have, including guaranteed annual salaries, medical and dental insurance, paid child-care assistance, paid pregnancy and parental leave, severance benefits, salary continuation during periods of injury, access to a retirement plan, multiple bonuses and more.”

US Soccer is obviously lying because we all know that this is about the perpetuation of THE GENDER PAY GAP.

Despite women being able to do exactly the same stuff that men can do, companies refuse to pay them the same that men are paid.

These companies could increase their profits by hiring only women, as they would get a man’s job done by someone they can underpay, but they also refuse to do that because of pure hatred for the hollowness of the genitals.

This is all the result of pure patriarchal evil infecting the system we live in.

Molly Levinson, spokeswoman for the plaintiffs, disputed the federation’s assertions.

“In the most recent CBA negotiation, USSF repeatedly said that equal pay was not an option regardless of pay structure,” Levinson said in a statement. “USSF proposed a `pay to play structure’ with less pay across the board. In every instance for a friendly or competitive match, the women players were offered less pay that their male counterparts. This is the very definition of gender discrimination, and of course the players rejected it.”

USSF President Carlos Cordeiro was asked during a Jan. 29 deposition about a statement he made when campaigning that “our female players have not been treated equally.”

“I felt then and I still feel to a degree, that the lack of opportunity for our female players was really what was at the root of some of their issues,” Cordeiro said. “The fact that the Women’s World Cup generates a fraction of revenue and a fraction of what the men get paid is a reflection, frankly, of lack of opportunity. … Women’s soccer outside of the United States doesn’t have the same degree of respect.”

The problem with all of this dumb bullshit is that men are not actually paid more than women, proportionally.

In fact, women are paid significantly more than men, proportionally.

The 2015 Women’s World Cup brought in $73 million, of which the players got 13% ($10 million). The 2010 men’s World Cup in South Africa made $4 billion, of which the players got 9% ($348 million).

If women were to be grossing as much as men, that would mean that women would have to be paid nearly 5 times the amount that the event brings in. If the event grosses $73 million and the women demand to be paid $348 million, someone is going to have to come up with $275 million.

Where is that money supposed to come from?

$275 million dollars is a lot of money. Are the men who run the tournament supposed to pay them out of their personal bank accounts? It doesn’t make any sense.

How is it even possible that this is going to trial? How did the court see that these women are demanding that FIFA pay them five times the amount of money the entire event brings in, and saying “we’re going to need a trial”?

This is almost more insane than the Harvey Weinstein trial. All of this stuff with these women is just going completely off the rails.

If I were FIFA, I would just stop having gendered teams at all. Why should they deal with this? They should tell the women “we now just have unisex teams, so if you want to play, you can compete with the men.”

Related: USA Women’s World Champions Lose 5-2 to 15-Year-Old Boys

Maybe women should be suing society too for not caring about women’s soccer?

The badass woman is a mythical creature that would be the perfect mix of braveness and strength if not for her silly weak spot clitoris button which, once pushed, terrorizes and paralyzes her instantly.

BBC:

Women across Switzerland have taken to the streets to protest against what they say is the country’s unacceptably slow pace to equality.

Friday’s protest comes 28 years after similar action saw half a million women take to the streets in 1991.

Swiss women have long campaigned to accelerate the pace of gender equality.

They joined millions of other women in Europe after World War One ended in 1918 in demanding the right to vote – but did not get it until 1971.

At the time of the 1991 strike there were no women in the Swiss government, and there was no statutory maternity leave.

Appenzell, the last Swiss canton to refuse women the right to vote, had just been ordered to change its policy by Switzerland’s Supreme Court.

Some things have changed: there have since been eight female government ministers and the right to maternity leave is now enshrined in law.

However, women in Switzerland still earn on average 20% less than men, they are under-represented in management positions, and childcare remains not only expensive, but in short supply.

Last month, a survey by the International Labour Organisation put Switzerland bottom of the list in pay rates between men and women in senior roles.

The “gender pay gap” topic is a kind of living dead topic that keeps coming back no matter how many times you put your sword through its heart.

Look. Let’s keep this short.

We live inside a system of Jewish Capitalism where profit is put above all else. If employers could really just pay women less than men and get the same work that men would do, everyone would hire women instead of men to maximize profit.

Of course, women are biologically incapable of doing the same work as men, they make different life choices, they don’t have the capacity or the desire to put in what it takes to reach the top, their personalities lower workplace productivity, they can get pregnant and decide to never go back to work, they have mood swings on a regular basis, and so on and so forth.

Journalist Beatrice Born, who was six months pregnant with her first child when she joined the strike back in 1991, will be striking again on Friday.

Beatrice Born: “We felt amazingly powerful that day. Because so many women took part. I thought, after this, nothing can stand in our way.”

Paola Ferro, one of the organisers of the 1991 strike, will be back on the streets on Friday, too.

Paola Ferro: “My reasons are the same as they were in 1991 – gender justice.”

Nicole, 24: “I’m taking part for all the women who aren’t able, or maybe aren’t brave enough to do what they want in life.”

Yes, Nicole, not all women are as brave as you. You are indeed very brave for going with the crowd after receiving support from all of the Western governments and media.

Truly an exemplary woman.

A new strike was first suggested last year in response to parliament’s decision to introduce more scrutiny on equal pay.

The government’s move only related to companies with more than 100 employees, a measure that women trade union leaders dismissed as virtually meaningless.

Since then, women across the country have been mobilising, using social media to take advantage of the power of the hashtag.

The hashtag is indeed very powerful.

#Frauenstreik – women’s strike in German – has been trending for days, along with #GrèvedesFemmes in French.

Events were staged in many of the main cities on Friday, including Bern, Basel, Zurich, Sion, and Lausanne, where women filled the station concourse to sing a feminist hymn.

Hymne féministe à la gare de Lausanne #14Juin2019 #Grevedesfemmes2019 #24hgrevedesfemmes #24heures pic.twitter.com/pjE42idIaO

— Joelle Fabre (@JoelleFabre1) June 14, 2019

In Geneva, street signs named after men were replaced with women’s names.

Social media has emerged in recent years as one of the most powerful techniques for quickly raising awareness of a particular issue and mobilising people for protests and demonstrations.

Nadine, a Swiss law student not even born when the first strike took place in her country, will be among those taking part.

“I think it’s a good thing,” says the student, who comes from the traditionally conservative canton of Glarus.

“People will get informed about the many disadvantages women still face: we don’t get equal pay, men still get prioritised with certain jobs,” she adds.

Nadine: “Girls are given fewer chances to go to university or higher education because they are the ones who will have children:”

Aida, a 25-year-old yoga teacher, will be striking too.

“It’s way easier for us to go on to the streets and demand things than it was for women 100 years ago.”

Many men will be actively supporting the strike, though they have been told to stay in the background, looking after children, and preparing food for the strikers.

“If we do not support each other now, who will in the future?” asks 24-year-old Clemens.

Clemens: “I am a man, but most of all I am human and I want equal rights in the real world for all fellow humans.”

Looks like a female to male transsexual from outer space.

“He” has that Mark Zuckerberg need to remind people that he’s human.

It’s an interesting kind of equality that these women want. Men are supposed to not do the same as women and to perform traditionally womanly tasks.

It’s almost as if by “equality” they mean “our turn.”

Who can even take them seriously anymore?

They think they’re some kind of brave Twitter hashtag (invented by a man) warriors but we can instantly win any confrontation with them without physical violence just by grabbing them by the pussy.

…and they call themselves strong, independent and brave.

They’re all just little girls acting silly.