People on the right-wing have supported this Khan slut. They say she’s against monopolies or something, and she’s going to crack down on Big Tech.

However, instead of doing that, she’s just attacking free speech.

ABC News:

A federal rule banning fake online reviews is now in effect.

The Federal Trade Commission issued the rule in August banning the sale or purchase of online reviews. The rule, which went into effect Monday, allows the agency to seek civil penalties against those who knowingly violate it.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said about the rule in August. She added that the rule will “protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

Specifically, the rule bans reviews and testimonials attributed to people who don’t exist or are generated by artificial intelligence, people who don’t have experience with the business or product/services, or misrepresent their experience.

How does anyone know what is what? Isn’t it the decision of the platform, whether they take action against fake reviews?

I’m not saying that fake reviews are good, but most of them are coming from this bitch’s homeland.

Aside from sanctioning India for polluting American infrastructure, I don’t even know how you would stop it. More importantly, this is an infringement against the freedom of speech.

How far from a “fake review” is “fake news”? You can’t ban lying.

What the government is doing to attack speech is the same thing they did to attack heterosexual sex. Heterosexual sex is still technically legal, it’s simply that there are so many restrictions on it, and so many risks of running afoul of these restrictions, that most men do not even want to deal with it at all.

Regulations against “fake” speech are a clear attack on speech generally.

Furthermore: doesn’t this violate SCOTUS ruling Garland v. Cargill, which found that the ATF did not have a right to ban bump stocks because by doing so, they were creating a new law?

It was at least theorized by legal scholars that the ATF ruling meant that none of these three letter agencies could create new laws. I don’t know what this review ban is other than a new law.

People Should Have Some Level of Personal Responsibility

Frankly, Khan’s cousins doing the scams on the phones is a much bigger problem than them doing fake ads (although I understand that issue would not fall to the FTC).

The spam/scam calls that Indians make to the phones of every American on a daily basis have completely shut down the telephone system in this country. It used to be that your phone would ring, and even if you didn’t recognize the number, you assumed it was a normal person calling you. Now, it is effectively impossible to use the telephone system, because of all of these subcontinental scam artists sabotaging the phone system.

Whether or not fake reviews are a form of fraud is debatable, but they can’t be legally fraud. Or, apparently they can be, but they shouldn’t be. Fake reviews are hosted by websites, voluntarily. Amazon specifically seems to have a policy of encouraging fake reviews, as they are aware that these fake reviews cause people to buy products for sale on Amazon. Maybe you could argue that Amazon tacitly approving of fake reviews is a form of fraudulent advertisement, but this is not what Khan is arguing.

Taken to its logical conclusion, this law would ban Ronaldo from advertising for KFC.

He obviously doesn’t eat KFC.

When Ronaldo or any other fit celebrity goes on TV and claims they eat unhealthy food, they’re giving a false testimony in support of a product for money.

Of course, the government is not going to go after major corporations for false advertisement. This anti-fake review law invented by Lina Khan is basically “the anti-drop-shipper law.” Much more likely, this becomes “we have laws against fake review comments, we need laws against fake review comments.”

People need to have some form of personal responsibility. The Indians who spam-scam call phones all day long are interrupting people’s lives, sabotaging their ability to use their phones for normal communication. No one is imposed on by fake reviews, and only a moron would ever believe random online reviews in the first place, unless it is something like the Steam store, where you know that every person reviewing actually bought the game. Any website that allows randos to sign up and make reviews is obviously going to be flooded with fake reviews. That will be true whether or not there is a law against it.

For the record, I’m not even against the arguments people give in supporting Lina Khan, it’s simply that I don’t think she is actually going to do any of those things that her supporters claim she is going to do. No one can name anything good the government has ever done, so it is actually deranged and maniacal to claim that the government is going to do something good.

So, the US government is at war with Christians.

But always remember: you should get really outraged when the Iranians call America “the Great Satan.”

America is the greatest country ever and we have the most freedom of anyone in the universe.

But yeah, Christianity is basically illegal and in Texas and Florida you can go to jail for talking about Jews.

The cool part is that if you’re black, you’re allowed to kill people and you don’t get punished.

The College Fix:

A state auditor’s office recently completed a review that found no proof there is any wrongdoing on the part of Grand Canyon University, but two federal agencies are continuing with their campaigns against the Christian university despite the findings.

The Arizona State Approving Agency, an arm of the state’s Department of Veteran Services, issued a determination Feb. 20 that risks identified by “court actions by the government” could not be substantiated, which means the private nonprofit’s students can still use GI bill funding to pay tuition.

“They said, ‘Zero findings. Not a single one. Not one,’” University President Brian Mueller told KSTAR on March 12. “That’s very hard to do if you’ve ever been through those kinds of program reviews.”

Grand Canyon University representative Bob Romantic told The College Fix in an interview that the audit addressed “all three of the central complaints of the FTC lawsuit” and found them lacking. He provided a copy of the findings to The Fix.

Romantic said the university continues to be “targeted” by what he described as “systemic attacks being made against GCU that we believe are retaliation for filing our lawsuit against the DOE.”

The Arizona State Approving Agency did not respond to The Fix’s request for comment.

The findings are the latest development in ongoing legal battles between Grand Canyon University and the U.S. Department of Education and the Federal Trade Commission.

The FTC alleges in its Dec. 27 lawsuit that GCU misrepresented the number of continuation courses required to complete a doctoral degree, resulting in a substantially higher price tag for students. They also claim the university engaged in unlawful telemarketing and marketing practices.

The commission has not dropped its lawsuit against GCU.

On Oct. 31, the Department of Education levied a fine of $37.7 million against GCU, accusing the university of “substantial misrepresentations” about the costs to complete its doctoral programs, as The College Fix previously reported.

GCU appealed the fine in November, calling it “unprecedented” in a news release.

“We’ve just hired the foremost attorney in the country at trying cases in front of the Supreme Court and it is our hope that this is such an egregious situation that the Supreme Court would hear this,” Mueller told Fox 10 on March 11.

Mueller has repeatedly made public statements arguing the Biden administration is maliciously targeting the Christian university, one of the largest in the nation.

The U.S. Department of Education did not respond to a request from The College Fix seeking comment.

They don’t have to respond.

They can do whatever they want and no one will do anything.

Meanwhile, in China, you can just go to church normally and no one bothers you.

But don’t forget that also China is a very oppressive autocracy somehow, or whatever, and they are jealous of our freedoms.

China is blocking American-Filipino warships from crashing through their territory because they hate that we have so many freedoms in America.

Russia also hates that we have so many freedoms.

Everyone in the world hates America because of all of these freedoms that Americans have, like for instance, there are child trannies and obesity and super-abortions.

Chinese people, the Moslems, Russians – everyone is so jealous because they wish they had all these freedoms.

But yeah, Christianity is illegal now.

Another Christian university got hit with a 14 million dollar fine in March after some sluts whined

The Chinese run all their businesses like mafia operations.

As the West’s manufacturing base is being dismantled, all of our electronics and other appliances are now being made in China. And we’re starting to get a small taste of what that means for our future.

The Chinese have no such things as morals or common decency; they’ll exploit every small way to make an extra penny, no matter how illegal or ridiculous, as if squeezing water from a stone.

So it’s not enough to manufacture cheap PC’s using borderline slave labor and low grade components prone to failure.

It’s not enough to manipulate their currency exchange rate and trade deals with foreign countries to get the best possible price for their crap products.

It’s not enough to ignore all environmental laws while making those products just to shave a few pennies here and there.

No.

On top of that, they’ll also infect their PC’s with hidden adware to get a few extra dollars out of third party companies, even if that exposes their customers to security vulnerabilities and constant annoyances.

We’re dealing with Lo Pan tier evil here, folks.

Ars Technica:

The FTC said Tuesday that it cannot stop computer makers from selling computers that inject ads into webpages to US consumers. The statement covers Lenovo’s practice of having sold computers pre-installed with the so-called VisualDiscovery adware developed by a company called Superfish. This adware, which was installed on computers without consumers’ knowledge, hijacked encrypted Web sessions that made users vulnerable to HTTPS man-in-the-middle attacks and shared user browsing data with third parties.

In a Tuesday court settlement with Lenovo, the FTC said the Chinese hardware maker, or any computer company for that matter, was free to sell computers with the adware made from a company called Superfish—as long as consumers consented before it was downloaded on the machine.

That’s like ruling that a plumbing company has a right to install defective pipes in people’s homes, as long as they sign a consent form.

It’s ridiculous.

People are freaking retarded. They won’t read, let alone understand, any prompt for consent. That’s why we need the government to control what these evil foreign corporations can do to our people.

Is this what you want? Well, I gotta admit it looks pretty cool, though.

“As part of the settlement with the FTC, Lenovo is prohibited from misrepresenting any features of software preloaded on laptops that will inject advertising into consumers’ Internet browsing sessions or transmit sensitive consumer information to third parties. The company must also get consumers’ affirmative consent before pre-installing this type of software,” the FTC announced.

The commission said Lenovo has stopped installing Superfish’s VisualDiscovery software. In February 2015, the software became one of the hottest topics in the security world after it was disclosed that the Chinese computer maker was shipping computers with VisualDiscovery pre-installed, unbeknownst to consumers. The software secretly installed a self-signed root HTTPS certificate that could intercept encrypted traffic for every website a user visited. When a user visited an HTTPS site, the site certificate was signed and controlled by Superfish and falsely represented itself as the official website certificate. The FTC said Tuesday that 750,000 computers with this software were sold in the US.

Are you looking forward to a future controlled by the chinks?

Sure, they’ll probably exterminate the Jews, Moslems and Blacks.

But how the hell are you supposed to run an intergalactic empire if all your computers are overloaded with adware, spyware and other bloated crap? How are we going to beat the insectoids if our ship’s targeting systems pause to show us tampon ads?

“I can’t aim! It’s showing me ads again!”

Also, what the hell is the point of having a trade commission (the FTC) if they don’t do anything about such blatant abuse?

We need institutions that actually look after American’s interests for a change.