free speech – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png free speech – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Burning Gay Flags is Not Illegal, These People are Just Lying https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/08/27/burning-gay-flags-is-not-illegal-these-people-are-just-lying/ Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000
Personally, I’m on team “Burn them all.”

I mentioned it yesterday, but I didn’t realize the extent to which conservative are claiming that it is illegal to burn the gay flag. It is definitely not illegal to burn a gay flag. All these cases they are linking of people being charged for defacing a gay flag involved real crimes, specifically theft and vandalism.

Some of these cases have been “enhanced” as hate crimes, with people getting worse charges than they would for stealing a non-gay object and burning it. That is obviously bad. But these people are purposefully trying to deceive people and make them think it is against the law to burn a gay flag.

There are thousands more of these tweets. It’s impossible to find anything on Twitter, I think by design.

This is total scum behavior. Lying on purpose to confuse people in order to push a censorship agenda.

And even if Democrats had made it illegal to burn the gay flag, why would Trump not just write a law legalizing burning gay flags? Why would your argument be “we need to do censorship to match their censorship”? That is a terrible argument and a terrible way of thinking about politics.

Burning the US flag is not really very important in itself. Obviously, I support it, but it might seem too abstract to be relevant. But that isn’t the point. What we saw under Biden and are now seeing under Trump is the government getting more and more involved in censorship of speech. Of course, it was all the way back in 2017 that I was banned from everything. That was, however, “private companies” banning me. I said at the time that if the government was not going to protect my speech, which is what the Constitution says it’s supposed to do, then it wasn’t really any different than the government censoring me. I pointed out that I would have much preferred to pay a fine or do a few months in jail – i.e., receive a government punishment for my speech – then be banned from all internet and financial services for the rest of my life.

Saying “it’s only the government that is allowed to strip you of your freedom of speech” would be like saying “it’s only the government that’s not allowed to murder you.”

There is an entire underlying issue around freedom of speech here, and it is very concerning how conservative commentators are dealing with it.

Matt Walsh is literally saying “I want to take away their freedoms because they took away mine.”

If Trump has all this power, why doesn’t he just restore the banned freedoms?

Switching presidents every 4-8 years and then having them each take away more freedoms, while no one even calls on any of them to restore lost freedoms, is a path to a tyranny where literally everything is illegal.

Matt Walsh is a disgusting worm.

Dare him to shave his face. I dare you to dare him to shave his face.

We all know what is going on under there, and it is not a jawline.

He is a worm pretending to be a human.

Conservative commentators are all worthless garbage. I can understand that they wanted to support Trump because they believe in elections and thought he was better than Joe Brandon. When a candidate is out of power, they can’t do anything anyway, so there is nothing to criticize them over. But after the election is over, your job should then be to criticize Trump when he is doing bad things.

Also, for everyone saying that fat guy got arrested because of Trump’s executive order – that is not how executive orders work and you’re retarded if you think that. He was arrested for starting a fire in a federal park in front of the White House. He could have been burning McDonald’s trash and yelling like that and would have been arrested.

If you thought that every time Trump signs an EO, every single police gets an immediate text message like “go look for anyone doing this immediately,” you are just a dumb person. Sorry. You should just be able to work through logically that it doesn’t work that way.

Look. I don’t even live in America and I am not planning to ever go there again. God willing. I’m not worried about being arrested. But I do run an internet website which is accessable in the US. With the way right-wingers are currently hopping on board the censorship train, this site is going to end up being blocked by law in America.

Why is this even a thing? Oh, because you hate gays and blacks and immigrants. Okay, fine. But if they were going to get you to go along with censorship, they would first have to find people you hate, right? Right? They wouldn’t get you to support censorship against people you don’t hate, would they? So they would have to find people you hate and then start agitating you that the censorship was against them, if they wanted you to support censorship.

This isn’t really very confusing or complicated.

As far as Trump’s plan to change the name of the “Department of Defense” back to the “Department of War,” I support it.

I would actually take it a step further, and say it should be changed to “Department of Blowing Up Hospitals, Bombing, Shooting, and Starving Babies for Jews.” If that name, DOBUPHBSASBFJ, is too cumbersome, they could also just call it “Department of Jewish Services.”

]]> Are We Still Allowed to Burn the Israeli Flag or Nah? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/08/26/are-we-still-allowed-to-burn-the-israeli-flag-or-nah/ Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Actions have consequences.

Burn the American flag, disrespect our nation, incite violence: ONE YEAR IN JAIL. No excuses. pic.twitter.com/mEBgJL6CNn

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 25, 2025

Donald Trump this week overrode the Supreme Court, declaring by executive order that it is illegal to burn the American flag.

Then some fat guy with very poor sounding speech went in front of the White House and burned the flag and yelled about White Privilege.

That guy had obviously been planning on doing some kind of social media stunt like this for a while. Why didn’t he go on Ozempic first?

I’ve read some tweets. Most conservatives are talking about how people have been charged with burning gay flags, and so if it’s illegal to burn a gay flag, it should be illegal to burn an American flag. What they aren’t saying is that it’s not actually illegal to guy buy a gay flag and then burn it, all the people who were charged with doing that grabbed the gay flag from a gay church or some other gay place and burned it, meaning it was theft and vandalism, which are actual crimes. Of course, adding hate crimes enhancements to theft and vandalism is insane. But the argument of “if we can’t burn their flag, they shouldn’t be able to burn ours” is stupid in a lot of different ways. In this case, if Trump is allowed to pass any law with an executive order, why doesn’t he just make a law legalizing burning the gay flag? Why doesn’t he outlaw all “hate crime enhancements”? He’s saying he can make any law by just writing it on a paper, so he could do that.

Wouldn’t we rather have more speech than less speech?

Please note: No one asked you to “work yourself into a state of hysteria,” Christopher. But you’ve set yourself up as a public commentator, an opinion maker, and so I think people expect you to have an opinion.

And then of course… the vets.

Veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan, btw.

I don’t know if he meant to post the Israeli flag and that is some kind of typo.

The question I had was: is it still legal to burn the Israeli flag? Because so far, none of the anti-speech laws Trump has been putting through have had anything to do with America, they are all just about Israel. The feds have seized control of the curriculums of universities and made it illegal to say Israel is genocidal or that Israel is like the Nazis, but you’re still allowed to say that America is genocidial and like the Nazis. So it would be out of character to outlaw burning the American flag while allowing people to legally burn the Jewish flag.

All this Trump police state type stuff is very strange and I think unexpected. It is strange that all of the people you would expect to be against this stuff are the ones supporting it.

The conservative media is ridiculously irresponsible. Obviously, when you start getting into military on the streets and so on, you’re establishing a precedent. This isn’t going to go away. In 2028, either Gavin Newsom or AOC is going to be president (it will probably be a shared ticket, with AOC as VP because she’s younger, but she will compete with him and might win). They are not going to remove the military from the streets or reduce the militarization of other law enforcement organizations. They’re also not going to add more freedom of speech. And if this thing where Trump can just make any law through EO stays in place, they are definitely going to use that.

To be clear, there is no way any Republican will win in 2028. I don’t believe elections are real, and I argued before the election that Trump would be allowed to win because Jews want him doing these wars for Israel. That seems to have played out, or be playing out, exactly as I said it would. But even if you believe elections are real, it is already obvious that Trump has completely burned any chance of any GOP candidate winning in 2028.

I guess if I believed elections were real, I would be telling anyone who wanted to run as a Republican to distance themselves from Trump aggressively right now. JD Vance can’t do that, but he was never going to win even the 2028 nomination regardless. But even if elections are real and someone like Tucker Carlson were to distance from Trump aggressively in preparation, no Republican can win, because this is too bad of a disaster and it is only going to get worse.

The next phase of the Iran thing is about to get rolling. Maybe I will have been right and Trump will end the Ukraine thing as that gets started, I don’t know. That seems possible. But yeah, just check the news: Israel is saying the “operation” is still ongoing, they are bombing Yemen again, they are threatening constantly, the Lebanese government is trying to disarm Hezbollah, Australia just accused Iran of burning Jewish restaurants in Australia (???), Iran is doing military drills and saying a new conflict “could erupt at any moment, China is shipping in weapons, CENTCOM is doing a leadership shift, the US is saying Iran is planning to attack America. And so on.

I am not going to predict a timeframe, but it is undeniable that this is going to blow up again, and much bigger, as all sides are saying “there is no solution.”

The point is: this presidency is going to be one of the worst messes in US history. Some people are still cheering some aspects of it, but especially if you include the Epstein thing, Trump has managed to piss off all of his own supporters in various ways. There is probably more Republican support for a war with Iran than there is for the one with the Ukraine, but even the boomers are starting to look at the Gaza thing like “wow, what is going on here?” And the Israel First agenda is not deniable, I guess the government is just hoping Americans prefer Israel over their own country and are fine with sacrificing benefits so that Israel can get more weapons to murder children.

The conservative influencer defense of the flag burning EO shows that they are really struggling to explain this stuff. “Well, if we can’t burn a gay flag then they shouldn’t be able to burn a US flag” is not a good argument, it is a retarded argument for babies, and these strange acts are not going to get any easier to explain as this continues to spiral.

And I mean. They are aiming for 400,000 deportations per year. So that is 1.6 million in four years, which is not even 20% of the number of people that came in under Biden. And remember: we had a whole lot of illegal immigrants before Biden took office. Also, even if the 400,000 per year target is hit, we will still end up with more people, because they are expanding H-1B.

But the fact that the deportations are so low will not prevent the Administration from using immigration as an excuse to implement a Palantir technological control grid.

So, at the end of this, no one is going to be happy with what we got, and Trump is going to hand over a massive police state and a completely new framework for making laws, a new framework for speech and vast new precedent for censorship of political speech, to his Democrat successor.

I guess the best we can hope for is that now that Trump has set a standard of deporting people with green cards for their speech, Prez Cortez might get rid of Jordan Peterson. Peterson in shackles, crying as he is marched onto a plane by masked thugs is pretty much the only good thing I can imagine having in the next decade or so.

And hey yo, dawg. I’m not trying to “blackpill you” with “black pills.” I’m just weighing in, telling it like it is. But to be clear, I’m reading and watching the materials from the pro-Trump people, and none it is all just a bunch of meaningless spin. They are pumping up the Putin meeting of course, and if he does manage to end that war, that will be good. I don’t know that he will end that war, but it could happen, and that would be good. But I can pretty well guarantee you that if that happens, it is going to coincide with a massive escalation in the Middle East.

The Jews moving in to totally occupy Gaza is not something that is just going to go away.

And if you did have a big war, well, I guess having military on the streets, completely new speech laws, a new governance system where laws are just whatever the president writes on a paper, and a Palantir techno control grid would be pretty useful in that situation.

Are any of you old enough to have been around listening to Alex Jones in the late 1990s and early 2000s?

He used to make these documentaries about how there was going to be Marshal Law in America with totally militarized police and actual military on the streets and a biometric control grid.

Here’s Police State 3: Total Enslavement:

My favorite was Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (which was also “Police State 4”):

The first two are pretty good too.

It’s sort of hilarious to me that this now appears to be where we’re going, and all of the people who you would expect to be against it are cheering it on.

It seemed for a while like we were headed for a more “Brave New World” type dystopia, but now the vibe does seem to be straight-up “1984” type militarized police state type dystopia.

Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World was written first, in 1932, then George Orwell’s 1984 was published in 1948 (hence the name). In 1958, Huxley published “Brave New World: Revisted,” a nonfiction piece in which he reflected on the original novel’s themes and also discussed 1984. He concluded that though the dystopia would be more like Brave New World, it would also have elements of 1984.

He talked about these issues in a 1958 interview with Mike Wallace.

The “overpopulation” stuff didn’t really age well. But some of the rest of it did. (And I guess it is true that population growth led to urbanization which led to more government control.)

It feels a bit like the coronavirus hoax was an attempt to do Brave New World, and now they’re just going full 1984.

But listen, the good news is…

Ah, wait. I lost my train of thought. I forget what the good thing is, but it’s something, I’m sure.

]]> Are We Sure We Want Black Sites in America? Alongside the Palantir AI Police State Control Grid? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/07/06/are-we-sure-we-want-black-sites-in-america-alongside-the-palantir-ai-police-state-control-grid/ Sun, 06 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000

The topic of the day is the fact that Donald Trump and his people have built a half billion dollar detention facility in a nature preserve in Florida. They are calling it “Alligator Alcatraz,” because I guess there are alligators in the swamp and you know, alliteration (the kids love it).

It’s funny to put immigrants in a swamp full of alligators.

But… are we talking about an American black site?

To be clear, a “black site” is defined as “a clandestine detention center operated by a state where prisoners who have not been charged with a crime are incarcerated without due process or court order.”

Is that something we really want to be doing? Building these types of sites in remote and potentially secret locations?

Please note that the Trump administration is also sending immigrants to Gitmo, the infamous black site in Cuba where the US spent decades torturing people it had kidnapped from various countries. Trump says he wants to hold 30,000 people there. Again, no one is explaining why they are not just sent back to their home countries. The US has an absolute ability to exert pressure on countries to accept the return of their people.

What exactly is even the purpose? We have jails. We have all of the leverage to deport people. We can make some concentration camp type holding facilities, just with modular homes and fences, put them near the border. Wouldn’t that make more sense?

I’m not against putting immigrants in camps or cages or whatever. But another issue with this is that it only holds 5,000 people, which isn’t really a very relevant number when we are talking about at least 50 million people who are eligible for deportation.

Further, the costs of flying people to this remote location, and holding them there – that doesn’t make any sense at all to me. Again, you can quickly construct concentration camps in areas where immigrants can just be bussed in and processed, we figure out where they’re going and send them there.

I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but what this looks like to me is that we are normalizing the idea of black sites in America. Because this place, this Alligator Alcatraz, would make a lot more sense as a secret prison for Americans than as an immigrant detention facility. As an immigrant detention facility, it is incredibly expensive, elaborate, inefficient, and generally confusing.

I’ve written some about the Trump Administration’s relationship with Palantir. Thankfully, others are writing and podcasting about this issue as well. Basically, the administration is contracting this intelligence and military tech company to design a control grid in America, and when asked about it, the Trump people just claim it is for immigrants. But no one is even claiming that only immigrants will be included in these AI databases that are going to monitor everyone. Palatir is building and has basically already built and is now just implementing a survelliance grid run by AI that compiles all information on you, both from the government and from private companies (i.e., Google and Facebook, and the banks), which is set up to build a profile on you that knows everything about you. It’s a total science fiction dystopian nightmare plan that few people are even bothering to talk about.

This Glenn Greenwald video is a good overview.

Palantir is a totally Jewish company which is involved heavily in the genocide in Gaza. The company’s Jewish CEO, Alex Karp, makes very edgy jokes about how he wants to kill the families of antisemites.

I don’t personally have very much faith in any speech guarantees provided by the US government. The Biden Administration violated the First Amendment by ordering “private” tech companies to censor speech, and the Trump administration has done things much more illegal than that, passing all of these laws against “antisemitism.” Trump arrested and and attempted to deport a green card holder for not supporting Israel. He says he’s going to deport anyone who doesn’t support Israel, regardless if they have a green card. Thus far, no one has been able to explain to me how a green card holder’s constitutional rights vary from those of a US citizen.

There is a lot of legal precedent for this you can look up. The Supreme Court ruled previously that an Australian communist with a green card couldn’t be deported for being a communist because a green card holder is protected by the Bill of Rights.

Listen, I’m the most anti-immigration person of all. If Trump said “we’re stripping all green card holders of their green cards and deporting them all tomorrow,” I would support that completely. But when you start claiming that you are taking specific rights from people who have rights under the US Constitution, you’re creating a very confusing legal situation.

He has also effectively seized federal control of universities in order to prevent students or faculty from criticizing Jews. He’s attempting to equate protesting against Israel with “material support for terrorism.” It’s all the exact same “safe spaces” and “speech is violence” language that was used by the Democrats in support of BLM and trannies, but Trump is taking it much further than Democrats ever did.

Further, the Biden Administration was mocked relentlessly for their “Disinformation Governance Board,” a government board designed to monitor supposed “disinformation” on the internet, run by Nina Jankowicz. They ended up abolishing the organization after a couple months. Yet “monitoring disinformation online” is six million times less scary than “monitoring literally everything you do or say all the time for your entire life,” which is what Trump has contracted Palantir to do.

If you ask any questions about any of this, you’re either called an antisemite, an far-left open borders supporter, or both.

We should be deporting immigrants, but we should be doing so without threatening the freedom of speech or creating AI police state control grids. We should also do so, I think, without creating remote black sites, which really adds a whole other layer to this which I hadn’t really thought much about until the announcement of this “Alligator Alcatraz.”

I suppose it is obvious that if you’re going to create a total control grid and monitor everyone’s speech and behavior, and US AI to modify behavior on a society-wide scale, the social engineering won’t work on everyone so some people are going to have to disappear. And immigrants are so unpopular, that the government has a chance to normalize – and get people to celebrate – this idea of people just disappearing and being hauled off to some secret prison. Doing a big fun publicity push with alligators is exactly what I would do if I wanted to normalize the idea of American black sites.

It’s all looking kinda dark, frankly.

The most frustrating part is just how well the social engineering campaigns already work. Granted, they are running into some issues getting people to go along with the whole antisemitism thing. Even a lot of right-wingers are very uncomfortable with the Trump Administration’s push for these “hate speech” laws. But with Palantir AI surveillance grids or remote prisons with no due process, if you start asking really any right-winger about it, they’re going to call you an immigrant lover and start telling you that they don’t care if alligators eat the immigrants. If you follow-up with “okay, but can’t we just deport them instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars to try to feed them to alligators?”, they will just get confused.

The answer as to “why not just deport them immediately” is some garbled gibberish about courts. But with the way the Trump administration is steamrolling the complaints of judges about the way immigrants are being handled, the idea they are really concerned about “asylum claims” an infinite appeals process is not really believable. “We will feed them to alligators but if they survive they can live in this cage for decades and keep filing asylum appeals.” Further, all of those laws about asylum could just be changed. Trump is ramming the most expensive an unpopular bill in history through Congress, so the idea he can’t get rid of these idiotic asylum laws is dumb.

For the record, though I did not read the whole “Big Beautiful Bill,” my AI did, and the only change to asylum law the current version makes is that you have to pay $100 to apply for asylum. The fee, of course, can be waived if a judge says so. It appears very much like the goal here is to create a gigantic federal standing army in the form of ICE, that is able to round up immigrants and keep some fraction of a percentage of them in various cages rather than actually deport anyone back to their home country.

This is at the same time we are normalizing deploying the military onto the streets of American cities. I’m not pro-riot, and I’m not against sending the National Guard to deal with riots, but sending in the Marines? Does that really seem like something we want to be normalizing?

Sadly, like with everything else in a democracy, there isn’t anything you can do to change anything. But you should be aware that we are really not that far away from Palantir AI identifying you as an antisemite, and a private paramilitary group with no insignias on their gear throwing you in a van and flying you off to some secret prison. The Palantir control grid is really already here, they are in the process of combining all of these databases on you and using the AI to build profiles. So it’s just a matter of when they decide to start using it and for what purposes.

The way the deportation thing is currently being handled, which is by grabbing random people and doing so in a kind of public way (while also not doing any kind of relevant numbers, just to be clear), very much looks to me like it is designed to normalize scenes of people being randomly grabbed off the streets. If/when they start doing it to white Americans, “hey wait, isn’t that a white guy?” might go through someone’s head, but it isn’t going to matter. And most people won’t register that it is no longer just brown people who are getting picked up, after they’ve witnessed enough of these scenes.

You don’t have to be particularly creative to imagine a situation where ICE becomes Palantir’s NKVD.

I know this might sound a bit far-fetched. But all I’m doing is the only thing I ever do: I’m looking at the data, and doing my best to draw conclusions about what it means.

It’s also probably worth reminding people that if you simply made it a serious felony to hire or rent homes to illegal immigrants, and started putting the people who do that in prison (just normal prison, no need for alligators or any Loony Toons shit), virtually all of the illegal immigrants would just leave.

Might also be worth reminding people that “illegal” immigrants have never caused even a fraction of the social, economic, and cultural damage that “legal” immigrants cause, and Trump is currently supporting moves to allow basically infinite numbers of “legal” immigrants.

It is very reasonable to suspect that maybe things are not exactly as they appear, and that maybe the government and media are not being perfectly frank with us about where all of this is headed.

]]> Tfw No One Told You Peasants are Peasants https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/03/12/tfw-no-one-told-you-peasants-are-peasants/ Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Words can’t express how disgusted I am with Trump supporters who defend their president stomping out speech rights for Israel after spending years wailing about the loss of free speech in America. It’s beyond mere political differences. I don’t respect them as people.

Of all the…

— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) March 10, 2025

Note: I’m not doing the news anymore, so I am assuming you know what is going on. But I’ll give a brief update, just in case. The Trump Administration has recently begun taking actions to crackdown on criticism of the Jews, at least as aggressively, if not more so, then what the Biden administration did to crackdown on criticism of vaccines and trannies. Perhaps the best aspect of this, which I didn’t even think was real when I heard it, was that RFK has declared “antisemitism” a health emergency. Marco Rubio is also deporting people for criticizing Jews. They’re also of course continuing and escalating the attack on universities that allow pro-Palestinian speech on campus.

Caitlin Johnstone, an “old leftish” blogger (she does support trannies and mass immigration, so she’s not exactly a ye olde leftist) who has a semi-popular Twitter account, has a semi-viral post up about how conservatives claimed about censorship for years and now all of the sudden support the Trump Administration’s egregious crackdown on “antisemitic speech.”

Everything she says in the post is just obvious. I’ve become exhausted by people saying obvious things, while being incapable of recognizing obvious facts about human nature, instead exalting a mythical vision of the ideal man that has never existed and cannot exist.

In response to conservatives supporting all these new laws and initiatives against criticism of the Jews, she writes:

If you are doing this, you’re just admitting that you don’t stand for anything, and you’re just drifting along with the herd and supporting whatever the man in charge tells you to support. You’re unthinking human livestock. A mindless, useless, pointless NPC. You have wasted all of your time on this planet, because you did not use that time to mature into a sovereign adult with basic intellectual agency and integrity.

(You can read the whole rant by clicking the above tweet.)

Apparently, no one told her peasants exist, and therefore she believes that standard peasant behavior is an egregious moral failing.

“Unthinking human livestock” defines the vast majority of the human population. This is brutally self-evident, simply by looking around, anywhere. Of course, the implications of that are too terrible for anyone who believes in “Western values” to confront, and thus they instead attack the overwhelming majority of the human population as immoral, refusing to reach the spiritual self-actualization that they assert, without evidence, is possible for all humans.

Obviously, it is disgusting to claim you support freedom of speech because you want to say tranny and retard (which is meaningless) and then support censorship of speech criticizing the most powerful people in the world. But did you think the peasants were not disgusting? Have you seen how fat they are? Have you ever talked to them? Have you ever listened to a modern pop song?

A couple years ago, “Wet Ass Pussy” was the number one song for like, months.

Peasants are not intellectual, they are not principled.

What peasants do is find a leader and identify him as a father figure who is defending their interests and then do whatever he says.

If Trump said it was time to start rounding up Jews, putting them in camps and gassing them, MAGA would be just as enthusiastic about that as they are about arresting people for criticizing these same Jews. There are not philosophical principles here. MAGA people don’t like perverts, they don’t like being told what to do, they don’t like being poor. All of the rest of it is extremely flexible if not outright arbitrary.

But if this is true, then democracy is completely ridiculous, right? And no one such as Caitlin Johnstone wants to admit that human nature makes democracy a completely unworkable system, and would rather just complain about how people need to become fully actualized individuals.

The reality is, in order to have a moral and principled society, you need an aristocracy that is bound by honor based in religious doctrine to guide the peasantry.

For the record, I think the original American idea of only allowing males who own land to vote was more or less workable. But when you have universal suffrage, and literally allow women to vote, along with negroes and immigrants, you are just going to get an utterly debauched orgy of grotesque moronism, a paradise for nonsense and cartoonish corruption.

If these people, Caitlin Johnstone and every other one of these people constantly complaining about hypocrisy, are so concerned about the integrity of a principled order of society, they need to start calling for an end to democracy. Right now, this is like living in a swamp and becoming outraged that you are being swarmed with insects, and condemning the insects as immoral for violating the non-aggression principle.

If Johnstone was talking about people like Ben Shapiro and Barry Weiss (and a whole list of other “Jewish conservatives”) who did their whole bit about free speech for years and now all of the sudden are calling for Andrew Tate to be crucified in front of the castle in the Magic Kingdom because Florida doesn’t tolerate people asking questions about Jewish power, then okay. Those people can be criticized. I think it’s pointless, because anyone who thought Ben Shapiro would support the First Amendment right to criticize Jews is retarded. But he is a public figure who frames himself as an intellectual who will “debate anyone on facts and logic” who takes positions which are not based on facts and do not make logical sense.

But attacking the peasants for going along with whatever the media says is so ridiculous that it is beyond ridicule. Caitlin, when conservatives were demanding the right to say retard and tranny, did you imagine that if Donald Trump said it was illegal to criticize the Jews, they would take a principled stance against that? Are you surprised by this development? I seriously doubt you are, so if you could have predicted it years ago, then how can you now be outraged by it?

We’re back to the old analogy of releasing a horde of hungry tigers onto the streets of a crowded city and being outraged when they attack people. If you understand that this “hypocritical” (really just mindless, as hypocrisy implies malice, which I don’t think is there) behavior is a part of the nature of the masses of humans, then just as you need to prevent a horde of hungry tigers from being released onto the streets of a crowded urban area, you need to prevent the masses of people from having influence on the direction of society. That means you have to end democracy, or at the very least, completely reform it and remove the rights of people who do not at least own property and have a certain amount of wealth in their portfolio from being allowed to influence public policy.

(Note: I understand that not everyone who is broke qualifies as a mindless peasant in the current year. I think this would have been true historically, but at this point in history, a lot of intelligent young men don’t have any incentives to strive for success, and make the calculation that it makes more sense to sit at home and eat noodles and play video games. I don’t support that decision, but I do think it is somewhat reasonable, given the situation created by feminism where men don’t really have any hope of building a family, which was historically the underlying drive to be successful. Well, technically, the original underlying drive was sex, but traditionally, sex led to children, and whether you were planning for it or not, when you see that little guy, it ignites a fire in you to work and build. Everyone at this point is aware that you can’t just get a good job and work hard until you’re 25 and then marry a 16 year old virgin. So the basic incentive is gone, and so there are intelligent men who say “fuck it, bro, /pol/ might be shilled out to oblivion, but PoE2 is fire.” That said, I can’t think of any measure other than wealth to measure the competence of a man to engage the political process.)

If every human citizen was fully actualized in the Maslowian sense, there was mass outrage against Trump’s move to shut down criticism of the Jews, and Trump would presumably change his position. More importantly, if only non-peasants were allowed to participate in the electoral process, Trump would not have needed hundreds of billions of dollars from Zionist Jews in order to get elected, and the entire House and Senate would not be filled with bought and paid for Jewish shills. The reason that campaign finance is such a cancer is that it allows targeted propaganda at the masses of morons.

Consider Dan Crenshaw, who is hated by basically everyone in America. Or Mitch McConnell for that matter. The reason they keep getting elected is that they have huge amounts of money, primarily from Jews and Jewish-connected internationalists and warmongers, which allows them to do massive advertising campaigns. These advertising campaigns are aimed at the peasants, not the thinking man. You could put me in an A Clockwork Orange style torture room watching advertisements about how Crenshaw is an American hero who lost his gosh damned eyeball to the hajis and now fights for freedom, and I still would vote for whoever his primary opponent was, and in a serious country, his primary opponent would be someone on par with Thomas Massie.

I agree with everything Johnstone is saying, just as I agreed with everything conservatives said about the Biden Administration’s crackdown on speech. But I agree in the same way that I would agree that “it’s a shame these hungry tigers are ripping people up on the streets of this crowded city.”

These people are not addressing the root issue. And I simply cannot imagine how that is not obvious. Actually, I can imagine it, and I know exactly what it is: they are tied up in an ideology that says that all humans are somehow equal, and they are all capable of totally rational analysis of often complex philosophical issues that underline political machinations. They are committed to this in a Captain Ahab type of pathological manner.

This has been going on for many decades now. There are a lot of people saying the same thing Caitlin is saying about the need for a principled social order, and they are on both the left and the right, and the things they are saying are self-evidently true. And yet no one cares, and they must know that no one cares, because their materials have zero effect on the functioning of society.

The root issue is that modern Western style democracy is not viable. It can exist for a while, and can even be prosperous for a few decades, but it is ultimately so corrupt, due to the ability to influence the rootless emotions and low intellect of the peasantry, that it is not sustainable long term, or even in the medium term.

H.L. Mencken was saying all of this in the 1910s. It has always been obvious. But of course, Mencken supported Hitler, so not only can he not be taken seriously, everything he said must necessarily have been wrong, because Hitler was pure evil, because he didn’t love the baby-killing kikes, the selfsame kikes who Caitlin Johnstone is now demanding a right to condemn.

]]> China: Free Speech Fraud’s Tesla Suing Journalists and Crash Survivors for Defamation https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/12/china-free-speech-frauds-tesla-suing-journalists-and-crash-survivors-for-defamation/ Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

China should just ban these “cars.”

They are a threat to public safety.

AP:

Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes don’t work! Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into an SUV and a sedan and crashing into a large concrete barrier.

Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the car’s brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than $23,000 in damages and publicly apologize to the $1.1 trillion company.

Zhang is not the only one to find herself in the crosshairs of Tesla, which is led by Elon Musk, among the richest men in the world and a self-described “ free speech absolutist.” Over the last four years, Tesla has sued at least six car owners in China who had sudden vehicle malfunctions, quality complaints or accidents they claimed were caused by mechanical failures.

The company has also sued at least six bloggers and two Chinese media outlets that wrote critically about the company, according to a review of public court documents and Chinese media reports by The Associated Press. Tesla won all eleven cases for which AP could determine the verdicts. Two judgments, including Zhang’s, are on appeal. One case was settled out of court.

The February 2021 crash in central China’s Henan province sent Zhang’s mother and father, who had a concussion, to the hospital for four days, medical records show. Zhang — who was unharmed in the accident, as was her baby niece — wanted to understand what had happened: How could her dream car have turned into such a nightmare?

Traffic police determined that the crash was her dad’s fault because he hadn’t maintained a safe following distance. Zhang, however, insisted that the brakes had malfunctioned, sending the car out of control. She filed a complaint with a local market regulator, requesting a refund and compensation. Teslas are among the most computerized cars on the market, so Zhang asked the automaker to turn over the full pre-crash data from her car, hoping it might help explain what went wrong. Tesla refused.

“Tesla’s employees were very arrogant and tough in dealing with my complaints,” Zhang said in an interview. “I was burning with anger.”

After weeks of stewing, she draped her damaged car with a banner proclaiming “Tesla brake failure” in front of the Tesla dealership in Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, some 200 km (124 miles) from her home. She sat on the Tesla’s roof and blared her protest through a bullhorn: “Tesla Model 3 brakes failed,” she said. “A family of four almost died.” The next month, she parked her damaged car outside an auto show in Zhengzhou. It was all to no avail — Tesla refused to turn over the full data and mediation went nowhere.

Tesla said Zhang had deliberately spread false information that damaged the brand and asked for 5 million yuan ($684,000) in damages.

The case, which a court took up in October 2021, came as Tesla faced a barrage of criticism in China.

Dozens of Tesla owners had been publicly complaining about alleged brake failures, battery fires, unintended acceleration and other defects, as well as what they claimed were misleading sales practices. The same month as Zhang’s crash, Chinese regulators summoned Tesla to respond to quality concerns raised by such reports.

Zhang’s emotional protest sparked a rare burst of criticism of Tesla in Chinese media. Under pressure from regulators, Tesla finally released the data from her car, which the company said showed her father had been driving nearly 120 km per hour (75 mph) and that the brakes had functioned to reduce the magnitude of the collision.

Tesla had finally given Zhang what she’d been asking for, but they’d published the data publicly and included her vehicle identification number. She said she and her family started getting threatened and doxed online. Besides, she wondered, how could she be sure Tesla hadn’t modified or redacted the data from her car? It was less than the victory she’d hoped for. Feeling besieged, she sued Tesla a second time, in March 2022, for invading her privacy.

Zhang lost both cases she brought against Tesla.

Meanwhile, the defamation case against her was grinding along. Back in court as a defendant, Zhang was unable to prove that the brakes on her Tesla had indeed failed. In a closed trial, a Shanghai court ruled in May 2024 that Zhang’s public complaints went beyond what magistrates considered reasonable, factual criticism and ordered her to publicly apologize and pay 170,000 RMB ($23,000) to cover damages and the legal costs of the world’s most valuable car company.

Zhang appealed the ruling. She maintains that her lawsuit is a cry for transparency and accountability and that a company as rich and powerful as Tesla should be able to tolerate legitimate criticism from its customers.

“I refuse to accept it,” Zhang told the Associated Press, “As a consumer, even if I said something wrong, I have the right to comment and criticize. I spoke about my feelings as a user of the car. It has nothing to do with damaging their reputation.”

Her odds of winning the appeal against Tesla do not look good. Tesla has not only won the defamation cases it brought against unhappy car owners and critical journalists, it’s also prevailed in lawsuits customers have filed against it.

Zhang posted videos about it on her Weibo account.

Safety advocates worry about the implications of Musk’s proximity to power in the United States. Federal investigations and safety initiatives Musk has long railed against could be easily snuffed out by the new administration.

In the U.S., Tesla also has been subject to a raft of customer safety complaints and lawsuits over autopilot function, battery charging, alleged suspension defects, sudden braking or acceleration, faulty airbags and allegedly monopolistic practices on repairs and parts. Judges have dismissed some cases. In others, Tesla settled out of court or paid hefty settlements.

Tesla has not publicly sued any of its U.S. customers for speaking out, though in January, Musk said on X that “maybe it is time” to sue media outlets for coverage that could stain Tesla’s brand. His post has been viewed more than 22 million times.

Tesla has already successfully done that in China.

It’s sort of ironic about the “free speech” thing, no?

]]> Another Judge Cockblocks Sandy Hoax Crisis Actors Trying to Steal Alex Jones’ Snake Oil Empire https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/06/another-judge-cockblocks-sandy-hoax-crisis-actors-trying-to-steal-alex-jones-snake-oil-empire/ Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Federal Judge Blocked Democrat Deep State Justice Department Operatives In Their Latest Attempt To Hijack & CLOSE Infowars! Alex Jones Is LIVE Covering This! MUST-WATCH https://t.co/ZkGQN1pZCB

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) February 5, 2025

I’m not a lawyer, but this decision means that Alex Jones can continue operating.

The crisis actors who sued him for calling them out as hoaxing a fake mass shooting are demanding he give them everything he owns for hurting his feelings, and several courts said he should do that, but every judge who has been forced to deal with the since then wants nothing to do with it, and just passes it down the line.

The Guardian:

A bankruptcy judge has blocked a proposed settlement between the families of the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting victims who sued conspiracy theorist Alex Jones over his false remarks about the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook elementary school.

On Wednesday, judge Christopher Lopez of the US bankruptcy court for the southern district of Texas said he was unable to approve the proposed settlement between the families and Jones’s bankruptcy trustee. Lopez claimed that their efforts to divide Jones’s assets exceeded his court’s authority.

Bankrupting a man over political statements exceeded the court’s authority.

The initial judgement marked the end of the First Amendment.

If you cannot accuse political actors of lying, what are you allowed to say?

The decision complicates a proposed sale of Jones’s Infowars platform, and could spur divisions between families who sued Jones and won nearly $1.3bn in Connecticut courts and those who won $50m in Texas courts. The two groups of families had proposed a settlement that would guarantee the Texas families a 25% share of Jones’s future payments to the Sandy Hook families, with the Connecticut families taking 75%.

…

Lopez said he blocked the settlement because the families were asking him to divide up assets of Free Speech Systems, the parent company of Jones’s website Infowars, which was dismissed from bankruptcy last June.

In statements prior to Lopez’s order, Jones bankruptcy lawyers, according to the Connecticut Post, said: “The actual goal of this settlement motion is to grab the dividend money before the appellate courts make a decision in the pending appeals, so that if the judgments are reversed there will be no way that Alex Jones may recoup those funds.”

The whole thing needs to be overturned.

Alex never even got a real ruling, he was issued “default judgements” for reasons that (as stated) didn’t even make any sense.

The reality is that if the case had actually gone before a jury, it would have been ruled that Jones had significant reason to believe these people were actors, and even if he didn’t believe that, there is no way to prove he didn’t believe that, and these are public figures who put themselves in the position of being political actors and therefore they do not have strict defamation protections under US law.

In order for something to be “defamation” you have to be lying on purpose. And as was seen with Donald Trump (most of all in American history), if the person you are lying about on purpose is a political actor, it is effectively impossible to be convicted of defamation.

It is very obvious from watching his broadcasts on the topic that Jones actually did believe these people were crisis actors.

Whether you believe that or not, it is obvious that someone could believe it. Especially someone like Alex Jones, who believes every conspiracy (unless it’s related to the Jews).

Just watch any of the conspiracy videos about Sandy Hook.

Maybe it’s wrong, and everything about the shooting was totally exactly as the government said it was. Honestly, I don’t really care either way, because even if kids got shot by some autistic DDR-master, that doesn’t somehow nullify the Second Amendment (or the First!). But if you watch one of the conspiracy videos, you can see how someone would believe it, and therefore it is not viable to claim that anyone who says they believe it is lying because they want to hurt grieving parents who are going on every TV show calling for gun control.

Most of the families suing Jones are Jews.

These are the primary judges who ran the Alex Jones Sandy Hook cases:

The court system in America was designed by honest men to be run by honest men, and when you have Jews and women involved, it simply does not work. If we’re going to have Jews and women’s rights, we are going to need an entirely new Constitution. This situation is otherwise nonviable.

]]> Sam Hyde Releases Self-Help Video, Following Up Viral Anti-Elon Video https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/23/sam-hyde-releases-self-help-video-following-up-viral-anti-elon-video/ Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Sam Hyde has released a new self-help video which is something of a follow-up on his video criticizing Elon Musk’s H-1B scheme.

On the Elon video, he posted a phone number for people to leave voice mails, and he plays several of those and responds to them with sold self-help advice.

Sam is one of my favorite people and I hope he keeps up this routine of public videos. I think he was still doing subscription stuff, but I didn’t see any of it because I am not allowed to use Visa/MasterCard for the rest of my life because I made fun of an obese woman who had a heart attack during a traffic accident.

As you can see above, the video is age-gated on YouTube, which is a soft (hard?) form of censorship that YouTube uses to stifle popular videos they disagree with. The video has no inappropriate content.

But you can watch it on Twitter.

Sam will probably be banned from Twitter again soon enough. I’m sure Elon didn’t think much of his viral criticism.

When Elon admitted to being a total Fraud Gamer in a DM chat with some random fat guy, he also admitted that he holds grudges against people who criticize him, even if their criticism is all true. He said he has no desire to work with Asmongold or Quin69 because they “trashed him,” despite the fact that everything they said was true, and Elon now admits that they were right in claiming he is a total fraud.

Laura Loomer got her blue check back, but she suggested (without directly stating it) that she had to personally call Trump and tell Trump to tell Elon to give her back her check. Others that lost their checks for criticizing Elon’s planned “Shit Tsunami” from India did not get their checks back.

I think everyone is going to get banned or at least censored on Twitter. Elon banned people for the lowest level things before the administration even started, so what is he going to do when shit gets hot?

I was banned for masturbating to the wrong image of a semi-nude woman two years ago, with no option for appeal.

There is certainly a lot of talk about freedom of speech, but right now Sam Hyde is soft-banned on YouTube and while he is on Twitter, no one really has any confidence he’ll be there long-term. And Sam is pretty mainstream. He had a show on the Cartoon Network and he did that big event with Keemstar.

So what of the rest of us?

I understand I’m the most extreme case of censorship in the world ever, and I don’t really even expect to get unbanned from anything – at least not until the US Empire collapses – but the freedom situation is not good at all and I don’t see Trump actually doing anything to address it.

Based on his plan for the US government to buy TikTok, if that actually happens, it would be illegal for them to censor it. So, maybe that’s a way out. I sort of doubt it, but okay.

I don’t agree with Sam about not beating your kids. This “peaceful parenting” horseshit has been used since the boomers, and if you look around, it sure as hell does not look like it worked very well. You should beat your kids if they deserve it and you should also make them butcher animals.

If you have a chance, take them to a public execution like in Game of Thrones.

Note that this beheading video is not age-gated on YouTube.

I don’t think I need to explain that age-gating is always censorship, as everyone knows that all of this other stuff is public on the platform. But why is Sam Hyde even ostensibly age-gated? Because he said the f-word (“fuck” not “faggot”)? There are billions of videos on YouTube that say “fuck” and I think at this point we all understand that this word is no longer “obscenity” because it is so widely used in society.

The video is totally worth watching.

]]> EU Forcing Social Media Companies to Censor “Hate Speech” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/22/eu-forcing-social-media-companies-to-censor-hate-speech/ Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Illegal hate speech is a systemic threat for democracy & fundamental rights.

The new ‘Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online +’ integrated into the DSA is crucial to strengthen how online platforms deal with illegal hate speech content.

More ↓ @EU_Justice

— Digital EU 🇪🇺 (@DigitalEU) January 20, 2025

The US could easily put pressure on Europe and force them to accept American standards for freedom of speech.

It would be very easy.

The only reason the EU is so strict about speech is because the US pressured them in the first place.

Reuters:

Meta’s Facebook, Elon Musk’s X, Google’s YouTube and other tech companies have agreed to do more to tackle online hate speech under an updated code of conduct that will now be integrated into EU tech rules, the European Commission said on Monday.

Other signatories to the voluntary code set up in May 2016 are Dailymotion, Instagram, Jeuxvideo.com, LinkedIn, Microsoft hosted consumer services, Snapchat, Rakuten Viber, TikTok and Twitch.

“In Europe there is no place for illegal hate, either offline or online. I welcome the stakeholders’ commitment to a strengthened Code of conduct under the Digital Services Act (DSA),” EU tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen said in a statement.

…

Under the revised code, the companies pledged to allow not-for-profit or public entities with expertise on illegal hate speech to monitor how they review hate speech notices, and to assess at least two thirds of these notices received from them within 24 hours.

More meaningful than banning trannies and DEI (which were already on their way out) would be if the Trump Administration forced the EU to respect American freedom of speech laws.

That’s probably not totally beyond the scope of things Trump would be willing to do. People would still get arrested in Europe for speech, of course, but he could prevent the EU from being able to fine American companies for allowing free speech.

]]> Telegram Founder Promises French Court to Strengthen Censorship Program https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/18/telegram-founder-promises-french-court-to-strengthen-censorship-program/ Sat, 18 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Pavel Durov

Now that people are aware of Chinese apps, they are going to start migrating off of these spying and censorship apps controlled by the West.

Until all the Chinese apps get banned.

RT:

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has pledged to strengthen moderation efforts on his social media platform, speaking before a French court on Friday, according to Franceinfo.

The Russian tech mogul, who also holds citizenship in France, the UAE, and St. Kitts and Nevis, was arrested in Paris in August 2024. The French authorities charged him with over a dozen offenses related to illegal content on Telegram, including complicity in the distribution of child pornography and enabling drug trafficking, among other allegations.

Durov was eventually released on bail of €5 million ($5.15 million), but was prohibited from leaving France and required to report to local police twice a week.

During Friday’s hearing, Durov told the court that Telegram is committed to “improving its moderation procedures,” Franceinfo reported. He explained that the platform deletes “between 15 and 20 million user accounts for breaking the law” each month and argued that Telegram is not alone in facing these challenges.

…

When the judges pointed out that many of these moderation initiatives were launched after his arrest in August, Durov said that only at that point was he made “aware of the seriousness of all these facts.”

Durov further stated that Telegram has increased cooperation with the authorities worldwide to combat illegal activity. Over the past six months, the platform has provided user data from approximately 10,000 accounts to law enforcement agencies globally.

See: Following CEO’s Arrest in France, Telegram Censor Speech, Hand Over Data

Durov didn’t want to do this. They kidnapped him and forced him to do it.

Nonetheless, the company is going to be useless.

The reason it was big in the first place is that they allowed so much more freedom than Twitter or Facebook.

If they’re going to censor just as much, there is no reason to use the app.

]]> UK: Government Wants to Force Pub Owners to Police What Clients Talk About https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/15/uk-government-wants-to-force-pub-owners-to-police-what-clients-talk-about/ Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Wait, how is this real?

It kinda feels like while the US is trying to roll back some of this really extreme tyrannical stuff in order to prevent a violent uprising, the UK is actively trying to provoke a violent uprising.

European Conservative:

Conversations overheard by bar staff could be classified as harassment by ‘third parties,’ according to recent reports—prompting fears that it could be last orders for discussing controversial topics in pubs.

Labour’s proposed changes to employment laws include a ‘workers’ rights’ component, supposedly designed to prevent employees from being within earshot of customers’ controversial or offensive talk.

Under the new proposals, ministers would require employers to protect their staff from harassment (already a criminal offence under existing laws) by customers or clients. Britain’s Equality and Human Rights Commission has warned that the new rules could “disproportionately curtail” freedom of expression and even cover “overheard conversations”. Classifying political debate as a type of harassment by customers raised “complex questions,” the commission said.

However, an earlier legal ruling protects “the expression of an opinion that may amount to a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010 and therefore attract protection from discrimination.”

When discussing current affairs, will future pub patrons be guilty of harassment or merely expressing a philosophical belief?

Starmer’s main preoccupation appears to be destroying pubs

Pub landlords, wary of potential legal trouble with staff, will probably take a cautious route, warning or banning drinkers who they think might be expressing the wrong opinions. Last year, the Southern Belle pub in East Sussex did just this, without needing an ambiguous new law to justify its authoritarianism.

Penalties might start off retroactively, with pub owners kicking out anyone they think is being “offensive,” to avoid staff suing them for not stopping harassment. This application of landlords’ ‘right to refuse admission’ (ROAR) would likely extend to permanently banning guests feared to express the ‘wrong’ opinions from the premises—in a further blow to a trade that struggles already, due to the smoking ban, competition from supermarkets, hyperregulation of live music, and historic COVID-19 restrictions.

Well.

Farage’s Reform Party is polling very high now.

It sort of seems like he is going to become Prime Minister, actually.

He’s not going to stop the immigrants. People forget that he actually said that Polish immigrants were taking places that should go to blacks from the former commonwealth countries. Although I respect the way he was able to do Brexit, and I respect his bombastic personality, he’s actually kind of shitty overall. He’s not a revolutionary and no one who isn’t a revolutionary is relevant to anything at all.

But, hey.

He’ll probably save the pubs? I guess?

]]>