This ad makes me want to join the army of whichever country the US goes to war with

It’s very clear to everyone that the American government has declared war on the American people, and it is now undeniable that the American military is fully willing to fight that war against you.

I just literally cannot even believe we are still talking about China.

The fact that people are willing to look at what the US government is doing and then say “you know, the real threat is those people on the other side of the planet who I only know exist because I heard about them on TV” is on par with people being willing to believe the massive rise in heart attacks is caused by global warming.

RT :

Trust in the US military has dropped so far that most Americans don’t have strong confidence in their armed forces, and the trend has accelerated since Joe Biden took office as commander-in-chief, the results of a new poll show.

The latest national defense survey by the Ronald Reagan Institute, released late last week, showed that just 45% of Americans have a “great deal” of trust and confidence in their military. The finding marked the first time that fewer than half of respondents to the survey have expressed strong trust in the troops.

Public confidence has tumbled 25 percentage points, from 70%, in the past three years. The rating has plunged 11 points in just the past nine months, under Biden, and the figures for other institutions are even lower. Only 19% of Americans polled had strong trust in the presidency as of November – down from 30% in February, the Reagan Institute survey showed. The same rating for law enforcement has dropped to 33% from 50% in the past three years, while media outlets have retained the confidence of just 10%, down from 16% in 2018.

Among those survey respondents who expressed little or no confidence in the US military, the most common reason cited was “political leadership,” the institute said. Those who expressed strong confidence were most influenced by their high regard for rank-and-file servicemembers.

Just 42% of Americans have a great deal of confidence in the military’s ability to win an overseas war, the survey found. Similarly, 40% strongly trust that the military will act in a “professional and nonpolitical manner.” Asked which country has the best military, 69% chose the US, while 17% picked China. Nearly one-third (32%) said the US uses the military in too many situations where diplomacy would be better.

…

China was overwhelmingly identified as the greatest foreign threat to the US, at 52%, up from just 21% three years ago. More than seven in 10 Americans (72%) polled said they believe that the Covid-19 virus leaked from a Chinese lab and that Beijing lied to cover it up. Fears over Russia have declined sharply, with 14% of those surveyed seeing it as the greatest threat, down from 30% in 2018.

Yep.

The small-eyed yellow people are coming for you.

Not your own government controlled by the same Christ-killing kikes that made Santa Inc.

In fact, those blood-drinking kikes just want to help you fight the small eyes to protect your American values of pornography, child trannies, and forced mRNA vax.

That’s why they’re building a stronger military for you, with women and trannies, which is our values.

This happened one week after the guy got killed

This is pure coincidence.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with Haiti refusing the vaxx.

All kinds of assassins are trained by the US military to kill all kinds of people, and if an anti-vaxx president gets killed, well, that’s just the law of averages. Or whatever.

RT:

The Pentagon’s top spokesman has confirmed that at least seven Colombians implicated in the assassination of Haiti’s president had received US training in the past, but denied it might have somehow “encouraged” the hit.

“Thus far, we’ve identified seven individuals who were former members of the Colombian military that had received some sort of … US funded and provided education and training,” Defense Department spokesman John Kirby said on Thursday, stressing that such training is “very common,” and did not “[lead] to or [encourage] what happened in Haiti.”

While Kirby declined to provide details on an individual basis for the seven assassins, he said the instruction included “cadet leadership development, counter-drug operations, noncommissioned officer professional development, small-unit leadership training, human rights training, emergency medical training, some helicopter maintenance training, and those kinds of things.”

This guy died in March, supposedly of a heart attack

He went on to say that he knew of no plans at the Pentagon to reconsider this “very valuable, ethical leadership training” program despite recent events in Haiti, which saw President Jovenel Moïse shot dead by gunmen at his home near Port-au-Prince earlier this month. Around two dozen suspects have since been brought into Haitian custody, the majority of them former members of Colombia’s military now working for private security firms, some based in the US.

The Pentagon had previously confirmed that some of the Colombian assassins had received American training, but declined to offer any details at the time.

…

Between 1970 and 2009, American-trained militants were involved in 165 coup attempts, according to research published in 2017 by Jonathan Caverley of the US Naval War College and Jesse Savage of Trinity College Dublin. Though their research was confined to only two specific programs, they found a “robust relationship between US training of foreign militaries and military-backed coup attempts.”

That’s just the nature of true democracy and our values.

Imagine how many more countries would ban gay sex if the US government didn’t overthrow them and force them to go ultra double anal.

Do you hate gay anal sex?

Are you an anti-vaxxer?

If not, then how on earth can you complain about all these coups?

Hmm…

Ukraine, 2014

To the credit of Defense Secretary Mark Esper, NATO has been working hard to avoid peace in Europe since 1991.

But, I thought this was one of those things you just did, not something you told people about?

Pretty bold to just come out and say it.

From the Department of Defense transcript of Defense Secretary Esper’s comments at a July, 29 press conference:

SEC. ESPER: Well, first of all, I’d say to President Trump’s credit, under his leadership, we have — we’ve seen an increase in defense spending by NATO. I think it’s over $130 billion over a few years. We have seen a few more countries join — I’ll call the 2 percent club. And that is, countries who have lived up to their Wales commitment — I think it goes back to 2016 under the previous administration — to contribute more to NATO’s collective defense.

Let’s be clear, I think Germany is the wealthiest country in Europe. Germany can and should pay more to its defense. It should certainly meet the 2 percent standard and, I would argue, go above and beyond that. And I’ve said that very publicly, I’ve said that very privately to my counterparts as well, about the importance of NATO, any alliance, sharing the burden so that we can all deter Russia and avoid peace in Europe [editor’s note. Secretary Esper intended to say “avoid conflict in Europe”].

And, again, the president’s directive in June accelerated that, and I think we are — we are excited about where we’re going and what it will mean in terms of our ability to enhance deterrence, strengthen the alliance in the process.

STAFF: All right, guys, thank you very much.

This was not one of those slips where the guy corrects himself – he just kept on talking to the end. So clearly, either he was not listening at all to the words coming out of his own mouth, or they made sense to him.

Which is worse?

Should we hope that he is just a Joe Biden type of individual and is not capable of making sense of his own speech?

Or should we assume that his brain is working fine at his age, and that this statement made sense to him?

We do have to wonder if he’s used to hearing and saying similar things in private settings within the Department of Defense.

That would explain a lot, actually.

Thank God we’ve had Donald Trump to hold back these petty, destructive agendas. He is the first president since Jimmy Carter to start exactly zero new wars or proxy wars.

I wish he would press that point harder in his re-election bid, and talk about the drone strike campaigns, color revolutions and the Libya bombing of the Obama-Biden Administration.

Killing people on the other side of the world is very unpopular, especially when you could just not do that instead. Progressive-leaning bleeding heart whites would respond well to this message, especially boomers who are old enough to have hated the Vietnam debacle.

If Biden wins, our nation will surely go back to terrorizing and looting other countries at random, and provoking Russia and China.

This does absolutely nothing for the American people. Wars of conquest made sense in feudal times, when the economy was based on land. Now, it is based on the technological capacity of a nation. All the capable people have nukes now, so the only ones that are still up for the taking are not even worth taking. It’s a waste of time.

I’m sitting here loving witnessing the collapse of Saudi Arabia. I really hate these people.

But it’s a little bit like #MeToo. I love #MeToo, because it destroys Jews, but I don’t agree with the underlying premise that you shouldn’t pay women for sex or accept sexual favors in exchange for promotions.

Just so, I don’t believe you shouldn’t torture and chop-up journalists. That is the least of what these people deserve.

But let’s take a step back from that for a second to all of these people attacking Trump over Saudi Arabia. This is the media doing this, primarily, claiming that Trump has “enabled” the Saudis to be bad people by not enforcing a foreign policy based on “our values.”

This is the same media that falsified all that evidence to get the US into the Iraq war, which killed however many hundreds of thousands of people. That was the New York Times, remember? It was the kike Judith Miller, who printed a bunch of fake news about how Saddam was planning to nuke America, who guaranteed that that war went through.

This bitch talking about aluminum tubes, Colin Powell brings fake anthrax to the UN, bing bang boom.

There is now no question at all about this – the Iraq war was based on fake news, with the media colluding with the “intelligence community” to start that war.

Then there are all these other wars the US has fought for all of these decades. No one has explained WWII yet, let alone Vietnam or all those weird drug wars in Latin America.

Beyond that, we are allied with all of these other countries which commit all these atrocities, most notably Israel.

Saudi Arabia itself has been a US ally forever, and it has always killed dissidents. Furthermore, why is this one journalist’s life so much more important than the lives of the 50,000 dead Yemenis in the war of aggression Saudi is fighting against them?

The bottom line here is that “our values” is not a standard by which to decide foreign policy. It is an absurd joke for the US to claim to be some arbiter of humanist morality – and even if it were true that we are the goodest of all good boys, using that as the basis of foreign policy would be stupid.

So on some level, even while I hate the Saudis, allowing the media to claim a scalp here makes me a little bit uncomfortable. I think it is clearly an “own goal” like the #MeToo movement, but the #MeToo movement is what paved the way for the Kavanaugh debacle (which could have ended badly).

My point: I don’t want to see right-wingers supporting the narrative of “our foreign policy should be determined by vague moral principles that we ourselves do not uphold” simply because they hate the Saudis and all of this endless Middle East nonsense.

Rand Paul is out there using this, saying “we shouldn’t be sending foreign aid and weapons to a country that murders journalists” – but he was already calling for the same thing, before any journalist was murdered, for much better, real reasons.

It is great that Saudi is falling apart over this. But I have seen the Jews very excited about it, and I think they are excited because they are setting a precedent.

This could potentially be used against Russia, Brazil and others. Which is why I think Trump is so hesitant. Plus maybe he also had some larger scheme he was working. I assume he had some larger scheme. But I don’t think it was a good scheme. The Saudi-Trump relationship was a Jared Kushner production, and it never should have been a thing in the first place.

Trump said during the campaign that Saudis funded terrorists who kill Americans and that we should cut them off. That was the much better position. If he had held that position, he wouldn’t be in a place where he has to vouch for a lunatic.

American foreign policy should be based exclusively on what is good for America.

Period.

There should be no second, third or fourth consideration.

Most especially, the lives of brown people, journalists and brown journalists should not ever be a consideration.

I’ve never trusted Nigel Farage. He’s got a used car salesman vibe to him and UKIP is hindered by its crappy ideas. Farage once had a far larger platform to condemn the Jews and didn’t – yet the Jews united to defame and attack him anyway!

But I think most people like Farage the personality. He recently let slip a dangerous conspiracy theory: the grass is green and Jews control American foreign policy.

So can Jews at least come up with some kind of phony explanation, rather than just re-stating these comments and calling it an “anti-Semitic” conspiracy theory?

The Jewish Chronicle:

Nigel Farage has been criticised for referring to “a powerful Jewish lobby” operating in America.

Mr Farage, who was presenting his phone-in show on the LBC network yesterday, took a call from someone identifying himself as “Ahmed” during a debate on Russian influence in last year’s US presidential election.

“How come there’s such an issue with Russia, and no one really highlighting AIPAC and the Israeli lobby and their involvement in American politics and elections”, the caller asked.

Mr Farage, referring to the “Israeli lobby”, responded by saying Ahmed had made “a reasonable point”.

He added: “There are about six million Jewish people living in America, so as a percentage it’s quite small, but in terms of influence its quite big. They have a voice within American politics, as indeed do the Hindu groups and many other groups in America. But I don’t think anybody is suggesting that the Israeli government tried to affect the result of the American elections.”

When the caller claimed Israel had Democrats and Republicans “in their pockets”, Mr Farage, the former leader of UKIP, responded: “In terms of money and influence they are a very powerful lobby”.

He went on to thank “Ahmed from Leyton”, who he said “makes the point that there are other very powerful lobbies in America, with the Jewish lobby, that has links with the Israeli government, is one of those strong voices”.

Can anyone calling Farage an “anti-Semite” make a case for what drives American foreign policy without mentioning world Jewry? Its not for oil – we didn’t get any in Iraq. It’s not to spread democracy – the Syrian people under Assad have many more rights than under Islamist feudalism in Saudi Arabia. It’s not to combat extremism – the enlightened Shi’ite Iranians are the ones leading the fight against ISIS and Al Qaeda.

The only thing Saddam (who hated Iran), Assad (a secular nationalist) and Iran (an Islamic Republic) have in common is that they were and are opponents of Israeli aggression.

Do Jews think they can continue to just restate criticisms against them while implying threats and assume everyone will be too scared to repeat them?

Being unable to comment on political and social issues in an honest fashion is the hallmark of every totalitarian regime. Whether the Jews punish Farage for this or just fire this warning shot will be interesting to watch.

The US is expanding its war in Syria. They are trying to stop the Syrian-Iranian-Russian Axis of Goyim from toppling the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa.

At the same time, the CIA is bolstering their Kurdish Judeo-Communist assets under the banner of “Syrian Democratic Forces” (SDF). Even if ISIS is destroyed, Jews like Ezra Cohen-Watnick are planning to keep the conflict going indefinitely.

Excuse me for the facetious question, but who the hell invited them?!

All foreign militaries engaged in Syria that were not invited by Assad are breaking international law. The Syrians, Russians and Iranians have every right to shoot down “Coalition” aircraft at will.

If Trump doesn’t restrain the Jews and Neocons in his government, he risks overseeing something way worse than the Iraq war he campaigned against.

The Independent:

Russia has said it will treat US warplanes operating in parts of Syria where its air forces are also present as “targets” amid a diplomatic row caused by the downing of a Syrian jet.

The country’s defence ministry said it would track US-led coalition aircraft with missile systems and military aircraft, but stopped short of saying it would shoot them down.

A hotline set up between Russia and the US to prevent mid-air collisions will also be suspended.

“All kinds of airborne vehicles, including aircraft and UAVs of the international coalition detected to the west of the Euphrates River will be tracked by the Russian SAM systems as air targets,” the Russian Defence Ministry said in a statement.

The warning comes after a US F-18 Super Hornet shot down a Syrian army SU-22 jet on Sunday in the countryside southwest of Raqqa – the first such downing of a Syrian jet by the US since the start of the country’s civil war in 2011.

Washington said the jet had dropped bombs near US-backed forces but Damascus said the plane was downed while flying a mission against Isis militants.

Russia’s defence ministry said the suspension of its communication line with the Americans would begin immediately.

…

“The shooting down of a Syrian Air Force jet in Syria’s airspace is a cynical violation of Syria’s sovereignty,” the ministry said.

“The US’ repeated combat operations under the guise of ‘combating terrorism’ against the legitimate armed forces of a UN member-country are a flagrant violation of international law and an actual military aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic.”

Theresa May appealed to Russia to continue the use of “deconfliction” measures over the skies of Syria to reduce the risk of misunderstandings in what is a crowded airspace.

In other words, “we’re going keep attacking you with impunity, but you better not respond.” Is there any question as to (((who))) is deciding our foreign policy with that level of Chutzpah?

Trump may be temporarily unleashing Team Tay-Sach in order to get the deep-state Russia hoaxers off his back. It was Trump’s liaison to the intelligence services, the aggressive warmonger Cohen-Watnick, who leaked intelligence that helped vindicate him from the first wave of baseless accusations via strategic leaks to Devin Nunes.

Anyone who knows Washington will tell you that favors like that don’t come cheap. What do they want in exchange for keeping the spooks away?

You American bastards just shot down my cousin's aircraft (Ali) while taking out the scumbags of ISIS in the area.
Ali hope you are OK bro😞 pic.twitter.com/z6IKFgbtqJ

— Majd Fahd 🇸🇾 (@Syria_Protector) June 18, 2017

Jews in Congress, the media, intelligence services, etc. are creating the problem while other Jews sell Trump the solution. They want to make hay in Syria to bog down Russia and Iran at any cost, but this type of politicking can snowball into a catastrophe for humanity.

But this isn’t 2003, and six years into supporting the terrorists they have not bothered to come up with a story for what we’re even doing in Syria.

The escalation of this invasion is so stupid and unpopular, even the National Review’s neo-con cuckold David French is calling for restraint. No Congressman will vote for boots on the ground (other than John McCain, (((Barbara Boxer))) and the other usual suspects) with the 2018 elections on the horizon.

Sadly, the American people have little say in their government. At the end of the day, the Russians and Syrians have no way to halt the Zio-imperialist creep other than to start shooting back.

Not everyone in the CIA and NSA is a pedophile, drug-runner or Jew-bought stooge. Former Bin Laden unit analyst and genuine patriot Michael Scheuer has spent his time since leaving the Agency fighting a one-man crusade against pernicious Israeli control of the US government. Despite his credentials and insightful books on US foreign policy, none of the cable news networks have brought him on to opine on the Syria strikes, even though they used to.

He is especially famous for confronting the “liberal” (((Bill Maher’s))) previously unknown belief that Israel comes before American interests.

In an April 2nd open letter to Donald Trump, Scheuer warned the President that the swamp was about to engulf him.

Here are some of the important highlights from his call to action against the criminal and dark forces embedded in our state.

Non-Intervention

–Montenegro: What can possibly be found in this irrelevant-to-America, Balkan country, Mr. President, that would ever be worth a single U.S. dollar or the life of a single Marine or soldier? What is it that makes this country worth negating the Congress’s and, thereby, the citizenry’s sole constitutional prerogative to declare war? What is it that benefits the United States from an automatic war if a non-NATO country attacks Montenegro? Mr. President, this is the fine madness of Senators McCain and Graham, both of whom are reprehensible political ghouls who love any war they can find so long as their children or loved ones are not at risk. Only the quickly growing-in-stature Senator Rand Paul had the courage to stand for America First when he blocked McCain’s late-night attempt to sneak Montenegro into NATO. Senator Paul needed and merited the support of you and your administration, as did the parents, wives, and children of our Marines and soldiers who would be killed or maimed in some half-assed, McCain-wanted war to defend Montenegro. Damn both you and your lieutenants for not joining Senator Paul to defend America First.

–Idiot Generals and Iran: Mr. President, with respect, you need to begin to think for yourself and go with your commonsense, and not with the advice of U.S. generals, a species that has proven itself unable to win a war since 1945, and who seem to live mostly to retire and become wealthy in the employ of arms makers, other industrialists, and foreign governments. This week we heard the Commander of the U.S. Central Command, Army General Joseph Votel, tell a congressional committee that Iran is “the greatest long-term threat to stability” in the Middle East, and that, “We need to look at opportunities where we can disrupt through military means or other means their activities.” (1) Later in the week, FOX’s top-and-always-wrong retired general, Jack Keane, backed-up General Votel and said that, under the Trump administration, ‘We are finally going to hold Iran accountable.” (2) Mr. President, have you ever asked your genius generals — serving or retired — why, if Iran is such a terrible threat to the United States, they support the growing presence of U.S. military forces in Syria and Iraq that are nothing more than facilitators for the Iranian leaders’ campaign to establish Iran’s control from the Iran-Afghanistan border westward to the Mediterranean? Or, why they believe that the only entities capable of destroying the Iranian regime — the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, their allies, and the Gulf Arabs who fund them — should be defeated using the blood and limbs of U.S. soldiers and Marines in a campaign that will do nothing but ensure Iran’s hegemony? Get with the program, Mr. President, your generals are anything but America First; note their universal support for committing America to automatic war via NATO. You need to educate them to the fact that America First means as little war as possible, and no war ever to serve the interests of so-called friends –Saudi Arabia, other Arab Tyrants, NATO, and Israel — and known enemies, like Iran, Iraq, and Syria. There is, of course, no reason not to shoot to hell any Iranian naval ship or aircraft that is harassing or even nearing a U.S. Navy ship in the Persian Gulf. Otherwise, the course of wisdom is to just sit back and leave the slitting of Iran’s throat — and those of Syria and Hizballah — to those who are most eager and capable of doing so, the fiercely anti-Shia, Sunni mujahedin and their Arab-tyrant supporters.

–Israel First: It is beyond me, Mr. President, to know whether you understand that there is a direct correlation between the manner in which you manage the U.S.-Israel relationship and the number of U.S. Marines, soldiers, and civilians killed and maimed by the mujahedin. The more you side with, arm, and fund Israel, the more Americans you will get killed. This was true when bin Laden declared war on the United States in 1996 and it is true today. It also is true that you, as president, are the only U.S. official who can limit the damage done to the republic and its people by this relationship. Save for Senator Paul, it would not be surprising to find that the other 534 members of the U.S. Congress are in the pay of one or another of the major Jewish-American political organizations, all of which you should immediately force to register as agents of a foreign power. (NB: Russia’s purported tampering in the 2016 election is nothing compared to the decades of manipulation of U.S. presidential and congressional elections by disloyal, Israel-First, Jewish-American citizens.) You will know, of course, that both Paul Ryan and Nancy Pelosi raced to the recent AIPAC conference to pledge their eternal allegiance to Israel’s interests, and this after they and their caucuses gave $38 billion of the money taken from U.S. taxpayers’ incomes to Israel. One might have thought, Mr. Trump, that that $38 billion would have helped pay for some of the infrastructure building, veterans’ care, and border-wall projects you promised. Would this amount not be helpful if spent in the interests of America First? So far, however, you have been nearly bellicose in your support for Israel, and you have sent there an ambassador whose loyalties lie entirely on the side of Israeli expansionism — and so war-causing — and therefore is a foe of U.S. interests and security. Whether or not Israel survives is of no relevance to the United States. It, like all other nations, has no right to exist and will continue to do so only on the basis of its own decisions and actions. The U.S. national government ought never to speak or act in a way that damages Israel’s absolute right to defend itself, but, more important, the national government ought to seek nothing but the kind of standard commercial and diplomatic relations with Israel that it seeks with all the other nation-states that are irrelevant to the republic’s survival, prosperity, and social cohesion.

Scheuer’s words are poignant here. Israel meddled in the 2016 election more than any other foreign power, the same is true for 2012, 2008, 2004 and so on.

Lee Rogers and myself are working on documenting the full extent of Israeli meddling. Hopefully we will be able to find a way to petition the government to investigate it once all the facts are in. It will fall on deaf ears of course, but that will only serve to highlight that the “Russian meddling” hoax is nothing but a political hit so Jews can get Trump to bend the knee.

Will they succeed? Only history can tell.

A little less than a week ago, I covered the Jew Rosa Brooks’ Foreign Policy Magazine bad-faith article, featuring candid talk of a military coup against the US government that may fall under federal sedition laws.

Now, she’s done an interview with PRI claiming that she’s actually a victim of intolerance. Unlike Julia Ioffe, her exaggerations and whining isn’t getting much Judenpresse play because bringing any more attention to her original statements is too much of a hot potato for even the Opposition Party to touch.

I, as a real journalist and occasional op-ed columnist, expressed criticism and concern, as did Breitbart and Infowars. Now, don’t get me wrong, I know it’s the new normal for people with power in America to casually call for the murder, overthrow and assault of people they politically disagree with like Donald Trump or even Richard Spencer, but Brooks’ case is different.

This individual is not a washed up celebrity or Guy Fawkes mask-wearing nimrod on the street, she has extensive and deep ties to the US military as a former Pentagon official, wife of a fiercely anti-Trump military colonel, as well as an ongoing role in a number of powerful Neo-Con and globalist DC think-tanks.

Nobody said she was planning a coup, only that there was enough evidence for the Secret Service and FBI to at least investigate. After all, the FBI feverishly wastes resources on so-called “threats” (usually just criticism) Jews receive in response for their illegal activities (e.g., in Whitefish), as if these public services are their private security. What Brooks did is on another level.

Now she’s going around claiming that the “Alt-Right” led a “lynch mob” against her because she’s Jewish and we hate freedom. Her article, which left nothing to the imagination with the suggestive title “3 Ways To Get Rid of Donald Trump,” speaks of a “hypothetical” scenario where the US military overthrows the democratically elected President because some might not like the Commander-in-Chief’s policies.

Foreign Policy:

Here’s how lynch mobs form, in the age of the alt-right and “alternative facts.”

First, you inadvertently wave a red flag at an arena full of bulls. Then you sit back and wait for the internet to do its dark magic.

In my case, the red flag was a few paragraphs at the end of a recent column, speculating on what would happen if Donald Trump truly and dangerously lost his marbles. I wondered about one “possibility … that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders”

…

Those are serious questions, and they deserve serious discussion. After all, America was founded by men who came, slowly but surely, to believe that they could no longer obey their government. From the perspective of American political mythology, they were heroes; from the British point of view, they were traitors. (Remember Patrick Henry? “If this be treason, make the most of it.”) With our history, it’s surely important to ask ourselves whether something like that could ever take place again. Political theorists continue to debate the propriety and role of disobedience and resistance to authority. Shouldn’t we debate those questions, too?

…

Within a few hours, the alt-right internet was on fire. The trickle of critical email messages turned into a gush, then a geyser, and the polite emails of the first few days were quickly displaced by obscenity-laced screeds, many in all capital letters. My Twitter feed filled up with trolls.

Soon, extremists and conspiracy-oriented outlets from InfoWars to openly white supremacist websites had moved from claiming that I had “suggested” a coup to asserting that I was demanding, planning, and threatening the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. (Together with my sinister friend George Soros, of course, and a cabal of deranged left-wing academics.)

…

My correspondents were united on the matter of my crimes (treason, sedition, inciting insurrection, etc.). The only issue that appeared to confound and divide them was the vexing question of just what kind of undesirable I was. Several decided, based presumably on my first name, that I was Latina and proposed that I be forcibly sent to the other side of the soon-to-be-built Trump border wall. Others, presumably conflating me with African-American civil rights heroine Rosa Parks, asserted that I would never have gotten hired if it weren’t for race-based affirmative action. The anti-Semitic rants flowed in, too: A website called the Daily Stormer noted darkly that I am “the daughter of the infamous communist Barbara Ehrenreich and the Jew John Ehrenreich,” and I got an anonymous phone call from someone who informed me, in a chillingly pleasant tone, that he supported a military coup “to kill all the Jews.”

Rosa Brooks is a well-documented agent of Soros’ NGOs.

Notice that in the very same article talking about how she swears she wasn’t endorsing a military coup, she drops a paragraph about why we need to have an “open discussion” regarding the hows and whys of a military coup against Donald Trump, because America was founded in a violent revolution, and so it’s morally the same thing.

There is no Constitutional, legal or historical basis for the US military overthrowing the President. Why is it being discussed by an elite and supposedly influential foreign policy publication? This is one of those “thought experiments” that reminds me of OJ Simpson’s explanation for writing If I Did It. She’s not doing it, but if it were to happen, this is one of the ways to “Get Rid of Donald Trump.”

It goes without saying that if the Daily Stormer ever published a “thought-experiment” or even allowed comments in the vein of “hypothetically” killing or violently overthrowing Barack Obama when he was President, Mark Potok would be siccing the Men in Black on our journalists at such speed that his Tallit would start disintegrating.

Yet in the end, it’s this elite Jewish globalist who’s the victim of evil bigots who shined the spotlight on her unethical abuse of her platform.

With the right programs and education, terrorists could be wonderful people.

As the Jewish worldview is collapsing at free-fall speed under the assault of reality, you would think that the intellectuals of a Semitic persuasion would try an adjust their rhetoric to be a little more convincing in this age of weekly Moslem terrorist attacks.

That would be the reasonable strategy.

Fortunately for us, Jews aren’t reasonable.

So of course, they double down on their insanity instead.

This editorial sounds like it could be take straight off of some sarcastic Daily Stormer parody. But rest assured that it is, in fact, genuine.

Thanks for the advice, (((Jacob))).

Jacob Shapiro writes for TIME Magazine:

Conspicuous generosity will create communities willing to help law enforcers catch terrorists

Recent attacks in Istanbul and Berlin remind us that preventing violent extremism must be a policy priority for the incoming Donald Trump administration. The last decade has shown that our good intelligence will never prevent every terrorist attack, and our aggressive reactions will never kill or scare away every potential terrorist. But we can do a better job of stopping the terrorist plots in the first place. The way to do this is to get communities that produce and harbor attackers to view America and the West more favorably.

In other words, we just have to be really nice to them, otherwise they’ll just keep blowing us up.

Targeting terrorist groups overseas is not enough. Tools of terror are everywhere. From the readily available explosive components to the semi-automatic weapons that can be purchased everywhere (including online) to the vehicles we drive every day, a would-be attacker has an almost infinite set of options. We need to intervene early, and the only way law enforcement can do that is with the cooperation of the communities within which potential terrorists live.

So this is the strategy this Jew is offering us stupid goyim: continue attacking Arabs and other enemies of Israel in the middle east, while importing these same sand people in our own nations, and try to somehow trick them into cooperating with our law enforcement agencies.

The Moslem’s breast is heavy with American pride. Or it would be, if only we could trick them into it.

How about this instead: we pull out of the Middle East, and kick out all these goat herders back to their desert. See how simple that is? Gee, I should be teaching political science.

In many recent cases of terrorism, someone in the community knew about activities that took place long before the attack that could have triggered an investigation. For example, months before the March 2016 Brussels attacks, a neighbor of the perpetrators alerted police to their odd behavior, but the tip was not followed up aggressively.

Yeah, it turns out “peaceful Moslems” don’t snitch on terrorists.

Maybe it’s time to rethink this whole “bring the whole population of the Middle East into Europe” thing?

Nah, that would be racist. Just keep the floodgates open. And if a few eggs need to be broken… Well, these omelets aren’t going to make themselves.

First, we need to avoid actions that feed into our enemies’ arguments about us—creating a watch list of all Muslims, for example. Policies that feed our adversaries’ narratives make it harder to get information from communities. Second, we should look for opportunities to improve America’s brand among the communities at home and abroad whose cooperation we need to prevent terrorist attacks.

The old adage that you catch more flies with honey than vinegar applies to counterterrorism. Conspicuous generosity to the innocent victims of terrorism presents a huge opportunity for public diplomacy. For example, we could do more to help refugees who are clearly victims of terrorist activity. Helping refugees will remind potential supporters of violent groups and, more importantly, their communities, of the vast difference between how the West treats victims of conflict and how they are treated by terrorists at home.

“Don’t make lists of your enemies, goyim, you could hurt their feelings! Instead, you need to send them billions of dollars! This is the smart way to do things. You’re not a sucker, are you? You can trust me, I’m your greatest ally.”

Does the kike’s chutzpah know no bounds? Is there a limit to the contempt they have for us, peddling such nonsense and expecting us to swallow it without question?

We can only hope that this neocon babble doesn’t find its way into the Trump administration. Trump promised us a Moslem ban, and that’s the only only thing which could possibly make a dent in this wave of terrorism.

The following is a response to the Jew David Rothkopf’s article in the Foreign Policy entitled “The End of an Era … for White Males.” The Jew Rothkopf is responding to trolls @djrothkopf.

Jews have had a great run. From the subversion of Greece to the birth of usury-based financial empires, they have controlled much of the world or sought to: So much of history is a consequence of decisions made by—and at the behest of—the Jews in charge.

Several factors are contributing to making this historic moment a watershed in global history. First, there is the rise of Nationalist movement, notably /pol/ Nazis and Donald Trump. While the planet has always been home to great non-Jewish civilizations, such societies have ebbed and flowed in relative ZOG control. Today, it is clear that these emerging White societies, namely America and Russia, are on the rise. So too—thanks to racial consciousness and political incorrectness, technological and scientific dominance, and the advent of meme culture—are other great and rich cultures from Hungary to Poland.

In addition, millennia of repression of goyim rights are coming to an end. Not fast enough. And not everywhere. But in much of the Western world, once Jewish-dominated domains are now populated by more shitlords than ever before, and this trend shows no signs of reversing—thankfully. Not only that, but around the world goyim are empowering other goyim, including trolls, to lead in technological fields in the Digital Age. Quite simply: It now seems to be common sense that no society can thrive if it fails to tap the intellectual, economic, creative, and spiritual resources of its White population.

Regrettably, due to the Jewish revolutions of the past century, flows of refugees and migrants of all kinds have shifted the demographics of societies and—protests and unease aside—they have proved nightmarish to fighting the demographic collapse, such as Islamization, that have put many advanced societies at risk.

Political correctness, Jews, and, frankly, Negro fatigue have led populations to seek other choices. Further, the societies that have given the Jew his greatest influence in the world—those of Europe and the United States—are struggling in key respects to maintain the patience. Economic pressures weigh on them. Political divisions are a drag on their growth and ability to act. As history has illustrated, it’s hard to stay on top while Jews drink your blood.

The result is that the status quo of the past century is going to undergo a profound change. In Europe alone, the influx of migrants and refugees is already producing irreversible hatred for Jews and non-Whites—a great blending of anger and rage.

But by mid-century in the United States, the former Jewish population will be rounded-up and interned in concentration camps: The majority, according to demographers, will be hardcore Nazis. By that time, Europe will include massive concentration camps full of people from Africa and the Middle East, as well as Asia. This is to say that by 2050 Jewish men will be the ones checking the “I’m sorry” box on census forms.

In fact, it is this idea of “otherness” that is going to undergo the greatest change. A current subject of hot debate, such othering has been used by some as a tool for fomenting hatred against migrants, immigrants, and refugees—an approach linked, of course, to nothing but perceptiveness and intelligence. (Attacks on America’s first black president had similar origins and took on a similarly insightful tone.) Whether the threat is one associated with Islam or extremism or simply economic competition within a country, the reality is that the expressed fears are directly equivalent in proportion with the actual, manifested threats.

A shrink I knew once said that if a reaction is equal in proportion with its alleged cause, then it’s time to start rounding up Jews. In this case, the politicians in America and Europe who spew nationalist glory and fan the flames of anti-immigrant furor are tapping into a growing if unconscious cultural recognition that the time is now to intern in concentration camps what has been the world’s most privileged ethnic class.

Of course, human mobility is not something to be tolerated, but rather something to be condemned. While belonging to a community is wired into our DNA for reasons linked to the survival-based social units of our most ancient ancestors, the story of civilization and progress has been one about fighting against the Jewish parasite.

There are two key lessons here. The first is that, given the fact that civilization is a safer, happier, healthier, richer, wiser place without subversive kikes, and without other cultures perverting it, it seems, expelling Jews and non-Whites has actually been for the better. For the United States, this is illustrated in its history: Since the early 19th century, new groups have entered the country and have been resented and resisted—the Mexicans, Arabs, Pakis, Jews, you name it. Yet over time each group has created huge problems for the United States, a country that only grew weaker with each wave of new blood and new troubles.

The second key lesson is that there is an alternative to “other” and that is “mass deportations.” Rather than focusing on our similarities as the smallest and most dangerous of our political leaders have done, the real leaders for this new era will distinguish themselves by focusing not just on the social diversity that destroys nations, but on the truth and wondrous benefits of homogeneity that actually lives within White nations.

As the nationalists, white supremacists, and genius hordes who follow them have sown seeds of division in the wake of new human flows across borders, the brilliant irony has been that they, in fact, have ended up embracing precisely the same kind of nationalistic ideals that is the stock in trade of their avowed enemies in Jewish Israel.

What we need are those who will stand up and say, “No. You have it wrong. Diversity is not beneficial in any way. It is the cancer.” That is, in fact, what has made America and every White society great. To be sure, we should not—not for one minute—lament the passing of the Jewish era, for there is at least a glimmer of hope that soon to come is the era of “Whites.”