Whose fault is it if you roll your truck?

The American court system is totally out of control. They are just applying the Alex Jones trial logic to everything.

Wall Street Journal:

Ford Motor Co. is facing a potential $1.7 billion in punitive damages after a Georgia jury reached a verdict Friday in a case involving a 2014 rollover of a Ford F-250 pickup truck that left two people dead.

The Gwinnett County jury determined that damages should be imposed on Ford for selling 5.2 million Super Duty trucks with what plaintiffs’ attorneys said were dangerously weak roofs that could crush passengers in a rollover accident, according to James Butler, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the case.

No one who flips a truck has a reasonable expectation of surviving, unless the truck is advertised to be capable of rolling, like for example a Jeep. The F-250 is simply too heavy for really any roof to be able to survive a flip, so if you’re too fat or too tall to get pushed onto the floor, you’re definitely going to die, and it’s not Ford’s fault.

This ruling is so silly that it seems like they are putting out this ruling just to harm the court system, to make it more ridiculous and unfair.

Far from trying to maintain order, the US government appears hellbent on destroying order in the country.

The easiest way for people to lose all faith in the government, and to feel like there is no reason to follow the law, is to make it clear that the court system is completely corrupt, and you have no chance of getting fair treatment by the law.

No one could possibly trust the US legal system for anything at this point, and there is no way to fix it. Like, no mechanism exists to fix a totally corrupt court system, other than revolution.

It’s part of why the Founding Fathers wrote all that stuff about how people were going to have to eventually violently overthrow the government.

Going back and turning a Ford F-100 into an electric car is actually very similar to making Superman gay.

Only Jews would do something like this.

Detroit Free Press:

In a “Back to the Future” sort of move, Ford Motor Co. has electrified a formerly gas-powered F-Series pickup from the 1970s.

It is a 1978 Ford F-100 pickup with a battery-electric powertrain and twin front and rear electric traction motors.

“480 horsepower. Zero emissions. It’s totally (expletive) bonkers,” Mike Levine, Ford North America product communications director, told the Free Press.

If Ford had built its new all-electric F-150 Lightning in 1978, this could have been it, he said.

Jews celebrated when they took over Ford, a company started by infamous anti-Semite and Christian hero Henry Ford, who wrote a book about these sickening and evil rats.

He used to leave a copy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in the console of every car he sold.

This man was all the way tapped in.

Can you imagine having a ruling elite that was Christian, that cared about the people, that fought against these Christ-killing Jew monsters?

Anyway…

Maybe this is the beginning of a trend of re-releasing older cars.

The new Bronco (not electric!) looked very cool until I saw it on the road, then it looked like a cutesy woman’s car. But it still looks much better than basically anything else made in the last oh, four decades.

It would make the environment so much less oppressive if the cars were not so ugly. Of course, the buildings would still be ugly. And the women would still be fat and ugly.

Jews cannot tolerate anything beautiful unless it is somehow corrupted.

Here are some more photos. Everything but the electricity and that stupid screen on the dashboard looks great.

Ford – the car of choice for Chinese communists.

Imagine being the CEO of a major corporation and being told by the government that companies who outsource manufacturing to foreign countries will be penalized.

What would you do?

A. Start closing down foreign factories and bringing jobs back to America, for fear of the incoming tariffs.

B. Try to plead with the government and strike out some kind of deal.

C. Flip the finger to America, close down remaining factories and open up shop in China, hoping for the best.

If you answered C, you might just be Ford executive material.

You also might be just about to go bankrupt.

The Verge:

Ford just announced that it’s abandoning plans to sell the Focus Active — which the company makes in China — in the United States because of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The car was supposed to be one of two models that Ford planned to sell in the US going forward as it shifts its lineup to be almost exclusively SUVs and trucks. Now, the only car Ford will sell in the US is the Mustang.

That’s what you get for betraying America, scumsuckers!

Maybe you should have thought twice before wiping your ass with our flag!

Ford CEO, 2018, colorized.

The 25 percent tariff on cars that are assembled in China has made a “very difficult business case for [Ford], so we’re choosing to deploy these resources elsewhere,” Kumar Galhotra, Ford’s president of North America, said on a conference call on Friday morning. Ford is in the middle of a years-long restructuring that it expects will cost $11 billion.

Oh, it all makes sense now. Ford’s president is some kind of Paki.

No wonder he hates America enough to bankrupt his own company.

He’s literally destroying Ford in order to express his brown rage at Trump and the rest of the nation.

Even if the trade war with China relaxes, Ford says it won’t change course, since it only expected sales of around 50,000 per year anyway. The company still plans to import vehicles it builds in other countries, like the EcoSport SUV (which is made in India).

Sounds like we have a new target for the next wave of tariffs.

In 2017, Ford decided to build the new Focus in China after it abandoned plans to move the production of the car from Michigan to Mexico. The Mexico assembly plant had been publicly criticized by Trump, who was still not sworn into office at the time. But instead of acquiescing to pressure from the president-elect and keeping production in the US, Ford decided to build the Focus in China — a decision that reportedly saved the company around $1 billion. The Focus Active will still be sold in other parts of the world, Ford says.

These freaking people.

I guess they thought Trump was bluffing? Or maybe they just did this as a gesture of defiance.

I guess hiring an antifa as company president was a poor business decision, huh?

Well, I’m guessing that “$1 billion in savings” is going down the drain now, if they can’t actually sell the car in America – because their precious Chinese sure as hell won’t let them sell them there without heavy tariffs either.

Trump’s burgeoning trade war with China, as well as increased tension with the European Union, has put automakers in a tough position.

No, it’s put them in a very simple position. Either make your car in America and sell it at an affordable price, or make it in your favorite shithole to save pennies and then find yourselves unable to compete with other manufacturers because of tariffs.

There’s nothing complicated about this.

Most leading car companies operate on a global scale, and production plants are increasingly being placed in areas where costs can be kept low. GM — one of the only other major automakers that currently imports Chinese-built cars — has also warned that it might stop importing the Buick Envision SUV if the company is not granted an exemption to the tariff.

Exemption from the tariffs?

Who do these people think they are?

Why don’t they try and push their Chinese communist cars on the chinks, if they love them so much?

Whoops, I guess not, huh?

Under Trump, the companies who collaborate and start bringing jobs back to America will prosper, while those who insist on manufacturing everything in the third world, no matter the cost, will lose millions.

I can only imagine that Ford’s “strategy” is based on the idea that Trump will somehow be impeached, and all his tariffs and trade deals will be reversed.

Their shareholders are in for a rude awakening.

Jews as a group have invested a lot of time and money into socially pathologizing every pursuit that doesn’t involve money or sex. Jews perceive morals as irrational and idealism as the opiate of fools. That is why there are no worthwhile Jewish artists or poets, while their philosophers are generally mechanical legalistic over-explainers (usually wrong) of how rather than why. Note how Jews are often over represented as interpreters of classical music, but as composers, they make you envy the deaf.

For this reason, the Jew Michael Kinsley can’t comprehend why Donald Trump is using state power to intervene in the capitalist dismemberment of America. Additionally, “liberals” and “leftists” who support the Democratic party and Obama are being put in an awkward position, as the very problems plaguing working and middle class people that they claimed had no solutions are beginning to get resolved before Trump is even officially president.

So how do you deal with this dilemma? Jewish ideologues at the DNC take political initiatives the goyim who support them wish they would do themselves and label it “Fascism.”

Kinsley writes for Washington Post:

Donald Trump is a fascist.

When you call somebody a fascist, you can mean any number of things. Often, it means no more than “somebody I don’t like.” It is an all-purpose epithet, usable by anyone against everyone from university deans to Fox News anchors. For that reason, the label should be used sparingly — saved for special occasions. As with “Nazi” or “Hitler,” it is often said that in any discussion, the first person reduced to using such a word has lost the argument. It’s ridiculous to compare any living person to Hitler or Mussolini.

But I mean “fascist” in the more clinical sense. For close to a year, and especially since his election as president, people have been trying to figure out Trump’s political principles: What does he stand for, how will he act as president? Various theories have been advanced.

…

But now that we’ve seen a bit of him in action, it seems that Trump actually does have a recognizable agenda that explains how he simultaneously can pander to big business generally while “strong-arming” (the words of a Post editorial Friday) an air conditioning manufacturer to save a few hundred jobs for a while. Or how he can make nice with the authoritarian Vladimir Putin while making bellicose foreign policy noises in general. Or how he can blithely upset with a phone call the absurdly delicate balance of our relations with China and Taiwan. All this seemingly erratic behavior can be explained — if not justified — by thinking of Trump as a fascist. Not in the sense of an all-purpose bad guy, but in the sense of somebody who sincerely believes that the toxic combination of strong government and strong corporations should run the nation and the world. He spent his previous career negotiating with the government on behalf of corporations; now he has switched teams. But it’s the same game.

The game has several names: “Corporate statism” is one. In Europe, they call it “dirigisme.” Those two other words for it — “Nazism” and “fascism” — are now beyond all respectability. It means, roughly, combining the power of the state with the power of corporations. At its mildest, it is intrusive regulations on business about parental leave and such. At its most toxic, it is concentration camps. In the 1930s, a few Americans (including a few liberals) bought into it. Pearl Harbor ended that argument. Even for Trump, “fascism” itself now is a dirty word, not just a policy choice. Even Trump would not use it — least of all about himself.

But the deal Trump negotiated with Carrier and its parent company, United Technologies, to “save” hundreds of jobs is a prime example of the philosophy. Trump brags about “saving” Midwestern blue-collar jobs through a combination of bribery and arm-twisting. Turns out hundreds more jobs will be lost, and Trump as president can’t possibly negotiate on behalf of millions of workers.

But Trump believes — truly believes, I think — in the title of one of his books: the art of the deal. He thinks he is the world’s greatest negotiator. When he says he won’t reveal his income taxes because he is in the midst of negotiations with the IRS, he may be sincere. He says, believably, that he gets audited every year. That means every year’s tax bill is just the government’s opening move in an annual chess game, and Trump doesn’t want to give away his own opening move. Now he plans to negotiate more “deals” and he thinks — because he can outfox some midlevel IRS auditors — that he can outfox the political and business leaders of the world. “The Art of the Deal” is not “Mein Kampf,” although “not ‘Mein Kampf’ ” isn’t much of an endorsement.

Just to be clear: If I’m correct that Trump actually has a governing philosophy, that’s a bad thing, not a good thing. If he actually has principles to guide him through those famous swamps he plans to drain, that’s alarming, not reassuring. Bad principles are not a good substitute for no principles. Four or eight years of bad principles may make no principles look pretty good.

Just to clear up the outright deceitful definition of Corporatism that Kinsley taps Howard Zinn and other Judeo-Left thinkers for, his definition is not the same as the economic principles of Fascism or National Socialism. Fascist governments and parties, from Italy to Kuomintang Taiwan, were innately hostile to capitalism (as it is understood in the West), especially the concept of individuals hoarding large amounts of capital (which inevitably leads to political corruption and plutocracy, especially in liberal democracies).

In the cases of early 20th century Japan and the Third Reich, these two nations developed their economies through central planning (“socialism”), although not as all-encompassing as in the Soviet Union. All of these nations still had some degree of free enterprise and private businesses, but they were subservient to the state and national interest, the inverse of corporate capitalist countries where the state is subservient to private capitalists.

Trump may well be inspired by these experiences, and both cuckservatives and Leftist Jews hate him for it, but it isn’t the same as cronyism which is what the modern definition of “corporatism” denotes.

Corporatism, as it was used by Benito Mussolini, is a rough translation of the original Italian that is obsolete in English today. The Latin root is “corpus,” or body. The idea is that the economy is part of a collective body – the nation; the original metaphor was that the relationship between workers and capital was akin to a hand feeding the stomach. If the hand and the stomach are out of sync with one another, and one is purposely neglecting the other, then the body cannot function and it dies.

Today the American body is dying, and the Jew is the festering maggot gorging itself on open national sores like New York City and California. The rest of the body – starving from the lack of constructive employment America’s largest industries like the “finance” sector offer – is in revolt, and Trump is trying to contain the infection.

How so-called “progressives” can denounce Trump for calling for crackdowns on Jewish monopolies like Comcast, or attacking Boeing, or negotiating to keep jobs in America, is beyond me, and beyond what’s left of their non-SWPL white vote (all 10 of them).

I like more things about Trump than I don’t (I really don’t like his latest Goldman Sachs Jew appointments), but I wish he would go further and simply nationalize any industry looking to take goodies and sell products for high prices in America, while giving absolutely nothing back. His solutions so far on this front are band-aids that will be torn off as soon as he finishes his 8 year term. But what matters is that it is a huge leap in the right direction to keep our people working.

I’m counting on (((Michael Kinsley))) and shills like George Will to continue labeling him a Fascist. Sociology is junk science, but since this is a game of margins, let’s hope in Trump’s case “labeling theory” is true.