Hey, well – this is gross.

We really should not be making new kinds of people, should we?

The Guardian:

Mass-producing eggs and sperm in a laboratory in order to have a baby with yourself or three other people in a “multiplex” parenting arrangement might sound like the plot of a dystopian novel.

But these startling scenarios are under consideration by the UK’s fertility watchdog, which has concluded that the technology could be on the brink of viability.

Bolstered by Silicon Valley investment, scientists are making such rapid progress that lab-grown human eggs and sperm could be a reality within a decade, a meeting of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority board heard last week.

In-vitro gametes (IVGs), eggs or sperm that are created in the lab from genetically reprogrammed skin or stem cells, are viewed as the holy grail of fertility research.

The technology promises to remove age barriers to conception and could pave the way for same-sex couples to have biological children together. It also poses unprecedented medical and ethical risks, which the HFEA now believes need to be considered in a proposed overhaul of fertility laws.

Peter Thompson, chief executive of the HFEA, said: “In-vitro gametes have the potential to vastly increase the availability of human sperm and eggs for research and, if proved safe, effective, and publicly acceptable, to provide new fertility treatment options for men with low sperm counts and women with low ovarian reserve.”

The technology also heralds more radical possibilities including “solo parenting” and “multiplex parenting”. Julia Chain, chair of HFEA, said: “It feels like we ought to have Steven Spielberg on this committee,” in a brief moment of levity in the discussion of how technology should be regulated.

Lab-grown eggs have already been used produce healthy babies in mice – including ones with two biological fathers. The equivalent feat is yet to be achieved using human cells, but US startups such as Conception and Gameto claim to be closing in on this prize.

The HFEA meeting noted that estimated timeframes ranged from two to three years – deemed to be optimistic – to a decade, with several clinicians at the meeting sharing the view that IVGs appeared destined to become “a routine part of clinical practice”.

This probably isn’t even going to be possible.

The media posts these kinds of stories about “The Science” doing miracles to help faggots and other sickos all the time, basically to encourage them to figure out how to do things like this.

Maybe you could make a person from one person. But you couldn’t do three people. Or, maybe you could, but it would be some kind of mutant freak.

But you can’t do it now.

We can see the sob stories now: “I haven’t met a life partner, the technology exists, I should be allowed to do this”.

Total insanity; we are sleepwalking in to a dystopian nightmare. No, we’re not being melodramatic: it is that bad.

Government and @HFEA must quash this.

— SurrogacyConcern (@SurrogConcern) January 26, 2025

Barely any campaign groups or media outlets are paying consistent and in depth attention to this agenda, or to what is happening at the fringes of embryology.

That must change, urgently.

— SurrogacyConcern (@SurrogConcern) January 26, 2025

Trump was excited to discuss his support for IVF during the town hall focused on women’s issues in Cumming, Georgia:

“I want to talk about IVF. I’m the father of IVF!…We’re TOTALLY in favor of IVF…We really are the party for IVF.” pic.twitter.com/PSb2wvDYv4

— Julia 🇺🇸 (@Jules31415) October 16, 2024

Honestly, the woman stuff Trump pushes is worse than the Jewish stuff.

Reuters:

Donald Trump called himself the “father of IVF” at a town hall for women voters on Wednesday, as the Republican presidential candidate tries to convince the crucial voting bloc they can trust him on reproductive issues.

Trump, who is trailing Democrat Kamala Harris in popularity among women voters ahead of the Nov. 5 U.S. election, suggested he was eager to discuss the issue at an all-women event hosted by Fox News in Georgia. The state is among a handful likely to decide the election.

“I want to talk about IVF. I’m the father of IVF, so I want to hear this question,” Trump said.

Hearing that some women were concerned about possible restrictions on fertility treatments, Trump touted his party’s support for the procedure, even though some conservative Republicans do not support in vitro fertilization.

Senate Republicans blocked Democratic-led legislation designed to protect IVF access twice in recent months, with some Republicans arguing the legislation is unnecessary as IVF access is not in danger.

“We really are the party for IVF,” Trump said. “We want fertilization that is all the way, and the Democrats tried to attack us on it, and we’re out there on IVF, even more than them.”

This encourages the worst behavior by women. They believe there is a magic technology that can ensure they can have kids in their 50s.

Remember to not vote.

Watch this video because a lot of people don’t realize IVF means having 10-12 viable embryos, picking your favorites, and dumping the rest. It’s horrific. We are already living in the dystopia you’re afraid of. Vote accordingly. https://t.co/hNriqZGHIt

— Thy Geekdom Come🇻🇦 (@ThyGeekdomCome) October 10, 2024

Jonathan Jacob Meijer

Women are a disaease.

They need to be contained.

The Guardian:

Even when she was searching online for a sperm donor, Vanessa wanted her children to know their father. In 2015, she was 34, the right partner hadn’t come along and fertility treatment “would have bankrupted me”, she says.

A website listing dozens of Dutchmen willing to donate privately seemed to answer her prayers. Though no photographs were posted, Vanessa was drawn to one profile in particular. The man – Jonathan – wrote that he’d been inspired to sign up after friends of his had struggled to conceive. “I thought: ‘That’s nice – he wants to help’,” says Vanessa.

Vanessa

Most important, for her, was that he was open to a relationship with his offspring. Under Dutch law, donor-conceived children may only learn their donor’s identity when they turn 16.

“He wanted to be somewhat involved with the kids, to know how they were doing … I really wanted my children to have that.” She laughs without humour. “That’s all gone now – and it won’t ever, ever get better.”

Not long after her daughter was born in 2015, Vanessa’s path to parenthood was blown up by a discovery on Facebook: Jonathan Jacob Meijer was a serial sperm donor, and her daughter had at least 100 half-siblings.

Last year Meijer was ordered by a Dutch court to stop, having been found to have fathered as many as 600 children in the Netherlands since 2007. Some mothers of his offspring – based as far away as Australia – believe the true number globally is closer to 1,100. Moreover, they don’t believe that Meijer has stopped.

The bizarre and unsettling story is the subject of Netflix’s new three-part docuseries, The Man With 1000 Kids. The series unfolds like true crime, each episode revealing yet another level to Meijer’s international operation. But its focus is on the women he deceived, the alliance they forged against him, and the families forced to live with the consequences of his actions.

Executive producer Natalie Hill came to the story in 2020, when Meijer had been investigated by Dutch authorities but not publicly named. Having connected with a group of “resilient, strong, passionate” mothers who had conceived with his sperm, Hill spent two years developing the idea before bringing in director Josh Allott. “It really mattered to me that they knew they could trust me,” she says.

Some decided not to appear on camera, while some interviewees are given pseudonyms. It was a difficult decision for them to go public, says Hill – “but they wanted to try and stop him.”

When we speak via Zoom, weeks from the series’ launch, Vanessa is nervous and fearing judgment. “I’ve been in the media before, but this is a whole new level,” she says as her two children – aged five and seven, both fathered by Meijer – clamour for her attention.

She did her due diligence, Vanessa says. Searching Meijer’s name online, she found his YouTube channel, sharing his passion for music, travel and philosophical musings, but no cause for concern.

Meijer was handsome, with long, strawberry-blond curls. But for Vanessa, looks were less important than shared values and approach to family. “I fell for his profile.”

After messaging for more than a week, they met at Central Station in The Hague – Vanessa’s choice. She’d wanted to be safe, she explains, her tone heavy with irony: “You never know what a man can do.”

They talked for over an hour. “There were no alarm bells whatsoever,” says Vanessa. Meijer seemed “like the guy next door”: easygoing, engaging, polite. She paid him €165 (£140) for his sample and covered his travel costs.

Two years later, when Vanessa was trying to reach Meijer about a second sample, she saw a post on a Facebook group for single mothers in the Netherlands and joined the dots: Meijer had not been honest about the extent of his donation. “I was like, ‘Shit – what the hell did I get into?’”

Meijer had told Vanessa that her child would be his eighth. Not only was this not true, but he had also donated sperm to multiple Dutch fertility clinics – at least 11 by 2023, according to court records – lying to them all about his activities elsewhere.

Vanessa had wanted her children to be full siblings, to grow up with that common link. Having learned that Meijer could not be trusted, “I really struggled with what to do,” she says. Fearing being misled again, she decided to pursue Meijer for a second sample – this time with her eyes open.

Vanessa recalls Meijer’s indifferent response after she confronted him: “Why are you surprised? If I’d been honest with you, would you have chosen me?”

Probably not, Vanessa agreed – but at least she would have had all the facts. “I didn’t have a fair choice. That’s what hurt the most.”

Vanessa cherishes her children, but Meijer’s betrayal upended her life. “My trust in people was gone, pulverised almost beyond repair.”

If I ever met this bitch, I would turn on my iPod and start blasting Bob Seger at her.

A group of families learn the charismatic man they had trusted is the sperm donor to hundreds — or perhaps thousands — of other children across the world.

The Man With 1000 Kids premieres 3 July, only on Netflix. pic.twitter.com/9Gce53u88N

— Netflix UK & Ireland (@NetflixUK) June 25, 2024

Related: Children? Want Someday.

It’s men’s fault!

All the good ones disappeared!

For the first time in all of human history, there is no man good enough for an average woman!

National Post:

From “egg showers” to viral TikTok videos of 20-somethings sharing their egg-freezing journeys, oocyte cryopreservation is having its big moment. The number of females in Canada seeking to preserve their eggs for non-medical purposes is on the uptick, with 1,200 egg-freezing cycles reported in 2021, compared to a mere 94 in 2013.

The numbers doubled between 2020 and 2021 alone, an unexpected pandemic surge. With social and dating lives upended, “a lot of people feel they lost three years of their reproductive life,” said Dr. Sony Sierra, president of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society.

In Canada, the average age for first-time mothers is now 31.4. “Society is sort of telling us, dictating, especially to women, what they should do — get your education, travel, get a job, buy your house, meet a partner, and follow that path. But of course, our reproductive anatomy hasn’t caught up,” said Carolynn Dubé, executive director of the patient group, Fertility Matters Canada.

Egg freezing can alleviate pressure, Dubé adds, “that sort of societal pressure, even the pressure a woman feels for herself on her future family-building plans. This is something they can do in their early to mid-20s, even their early 30s.”

Apple and Facebook were among the first to pick up the costs of egg freezing for female staff, and other major tech companies and big banks followed suit, though corporate Canada has been less enthusiastic than corporate America to embrace employer-paid egg preservation. Still, Canadian fertility clinics are hosting virtual webinars for the curious on “all things egg freezing,” heartening fertility specialists and patient advocates who say it’s important to make young women, or young people with ovaries, aware of age-related changes to the quantity and quality of their eggs.

While it’s often pitched as a fertility insurance policy or back-up plan for when women are ready to conceive, egg freezing is expensive. There’s no guarantee of a pregnancy or live birth in the end and, rather than bolstering a woman’s reproductive freedom, a recent study found egg-freezing workplace perks can seem more pressuring than progressive, an implicit nudge that women should make work, and not babies, their central focus.

Others argue the primary reason women are electing to place their eggs in deep freeze is a lack of worthy and stable reproductive partners.

Yeah, okay.

Freeze your eggs and try having a baby at 38 when you’ve realized that you’re going to have to settle for a man who is not really good enough but is the only thing available for you.

Hope the baby doesn’t have autism and Down syndrome.

Salute.

Mice with two fathers.

Not the first time reported.

But this result is from a top notch group in Japan, and this time the mice live and even have their own kids.

It foreshadows “gaybies” or biological children whose parents are the same sex. https://t.co/wndI5Ze3cZ

— Antonio Regalado (@antonioregalado) March 8, 2023

Imagine the biological son of two faggots.

He would be so woke, he’d get triggered by simple facts and then not realize that facts don’t care about his feelings.

The Guardian:

Scientists have created mice with two biological fathers by generating eggs from male cells, a development that opens up radical new possibilities for reproduction.

The advance could ultimately pave the way for treatments for severe forms of infertility, as well as raising the tantalising prospect of same-sex couples being able to have a biological child together in the future.

“This is the first case of making robust mammal oocytes from male cells,” said Katsuhiko Hayashi, who led the work at Kyushu University in Japan and is internationally renowned as a pioneer in the field of lab-grown eggs and sperm.

Katsuhiko Hayashi

Hayashi, who presented the development at the Third International Summit on Human Genome Editing at the Francis Crick Institute in London on Wednesday, predicts that it will be technically possible to create a viable human egg from a male skin cell within a decade. Others suggested this timeline was optimistic given that scientists are yet to create viable lab-grown human eggs from female cells.

Previously scientists have created mice that technically had two biological fathers through a chain of elaborate steps, including genetic engineering. However, this is the first time viable eggs have been cultivated from male cells and marks a significant advance. Hayashi’s team is now attempting to replicate this achievement with human cells, although there would be significant hurdles for the use of lab-grown eggs for clinical purposes, including establishing their safety.

“Purely in terms of technology, it will be possible [in humans] even in 10 years,” he said, adding that he personally would be in favour of the technology being used clinically to allow two men to have a baby if it were shown to be safe.

“I don’t know whether they’ll be available for reproduction,” he said. “That is not a question just for the scientific programme, but also for [society].”

…

The baby mice appeared healthy, had a normal lifespan, and went on to have offspring as adults. “They look OK, they look to be growing normally, they become fathers,” said Hayashi.

He and colleagues are now attempting to replicate the creation of lab-grown eggs using human cells.

We have to wonder who is funding science to create faggot butt babies while a lot of people have real, serious problems.

I suspect it’s the Jews, but I will have to confirm that.

Trying to force unequal beings to act the same way is having devastating effects on our world.

We pretend that blacks are the same as whites, yet we have whites bearing the burden of keeping that illusion alive.

We also pretend that women are the same as men, yet we live in a system that depends on forcefully extracting resources from men to keep that illusion alive.

Source

Blacks would rather be blacks and chill with their tribe.

They are happier that way.

Similarly, women would rather be women and fulfill their maternal duties.

But by the time they figure that out, it’s already too late for them.

Daily Mail:

Women wanting to delay motherhood are being warned freezing their eggs does not guarantee they will have a baby later in life.

Scientists discovered women have less than a one in five chance of conceiving after having the common £8,000 procedure.

The Newcastle Fertility Centre, behind the study, analysed all IVF births going back 15 years using data from the UK’s fertility regulator.

IVF births in the mid-2000s skew the success rate (18 per cent) because techniques have vastly improved since then.

But experts say the finding should serve as a warning to women that the procedure could take five attempts before working.

To increase their chances, women are being urged to have their eggs frozen in their early twenties.

The vast majority who go through the procedure do so in their late 30s – by which time they have very little chance of success.

Women get drunk with corruption disguised as power — the so-called empowerment — and waste the most important decades of their lives getting drunk and infected with random STIs in-between the time they spend doing busywork in some office.

Embracing the “their body, their choice” attitude towards motherhood means granting women as a group the right to decide whether their people should go extinct or not and the power to single-handedly extinguish their kin.

Women’s “thoughts” are modeled by social consensus, and considering that our enemies are in control of the media — which is the biggest apparatus influencing social consensus — it becomes clear that giving women the right to choose means adding additional players to the enemy team.

Giving women the right to vote and participate in Democracy is like having players in your team scoring goals for the opponent.

Specialists fear fertility clinics encourage women to delay motherhood for too long, by offering them the safety net of egg freezing.

Figures show two-thirds of women who freeze their eggs in Britain do not do so until they are over the age of 35.

Rita Ora is one woman who has bucked the trend. The pop singer, 27, had her eggs frozen following a recommendation from her GP.

‘I have always wanted a big family and my doctor asked me “I think you should freeze your eggs” when I was in my early 20s,’ said Miss Ora, who was born in Kosovo before moving to London when she was one.

‘He said you are healthiest now, why not put them away and then you never have to worry about it again.’

If women have to join the workforce and work…

Why do they have to join the workforce during their fertile years and then have children instead of having children during their fertile years and then joining the workforce once their kids are old enough?

Mothers are not supposed to be the same age as someone else’s grandmother.

Experts are worried young women do ‘not feel the threat of infertility’ – partly because they are given the false hope of freezing their eggs later.

But by the time they get round to it, fertility treatment is a ‘last-ditch’ effort with diminishing chances of success.

Egg freezing is booming in Britain, with 1,173 women opting to store their eggs in 2016 – nearly double the figure from 2014.

Fertility doctors report that many women put off having a family to pursue their career.

They then realise in their late 30s that they have no partner, and will soon become too old to conceive naturally, so freeze their eggs to preserve their fertility.

But despite the popularity of the technology, the chance of success is low – with 85 per cent of eggs not even surviving the freezing process.

And it gets worse with age, with 8.2 per cent of frozen eggs resulting in a baby for under-35s, and just 3.3 per cent for older women.

Women in this age bracket need 30 frozen eggs on average to become pregnant.

Having women think they can just freeze their eggs and get away with decades of a meaningless and hedonistic existence makes for a pretty lucrative business.

These procedures are ridiculously expensive and women going through them are so desperate that they’ll spend whatever they’re able to afford hoping to finally become mothers.

“Lose youth trying to accumulate wealth, lose wealth trying to become a mother. Nothing remains.”

Like doctors profiting from performing “sex reassignment” surgeries on the mentally ill, fertility doctors encouraging egg-freezing as a path towards motherhood are preying on desperate people for monetary gain.

You should be paying for lesbians and single mothers’ kids because Equality.

After all, aren’t lesbians and single women already paying for YOUR kids?

Breitbart:

Single women and lesbians in France won’t have to go abroad to have babies anymore under a proposed new law that would give them access to medically assisted reproduction for the first time.

French President Emmanuel Macron’s government has presented a draft law on bioethics that includes expanding the eligibility for treatments such as artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization, or IVF. French law currently restricts assisted reproduction to infertile heterosexual couples.

…

With the proposed bill, the French national health care system would cover the cost of assisted reproduction for all women, under an age limit yet to be set, for four rounds of treatments for each pregnancy. The bill also allows sperm donor anonymity to be lifted on demand by donors’ children when they reach 18, instead of the strict donor anonymity that now exists in France. The proposed law will not lift the French ban on surrogacy.

Insemination, fertility treatments and all forms of assisted reproduction are pretty expensive procedures. The cost is not to be downplayed.

The law would keep the babies and mothers from running afoul of the French legal system and give them access to the country’s generous health care system.

The changes were a key demand of French LGBT rights groups after France legalized same-sex marriage in 2013.

“This simply is a measure of equality for French female citizens, whatever their sexual orientation is,” the Association of Gay and Lesbian Parents and Future Parents said in a statement.

…

Medically assisted reproduction for lesbian couples or single women or both is already legal in 18 of the European Union’s 28 countries. French women now blocked from getting assisted reproduction at home often go to neighboring Spain or Belgium if they can afford it, where a single IVF round costs several thousand euros (dollars).

Oh, they’re just moving on with the times.

If they want to give women the right to have kids with no father figure around, they’re implicitly stating that they think fathers are not really necessary for the well-being and development of the kid.

If that is the case, having any law forcing men to pay for their kids would be a contradiction.

Why should men pay for kids if women have control over their wombs and fathers are not necessary for children?

This should be discussed.

It doesn’t make sense to allow single women or lesbians to be artificially inseminated and to raise kids with no fathers in the same system that forces men to pay for their kids alleging that kids need a father.

If women are so strong and independent that they can have kids without men, then stop forcing men to give their money to women just because they are the mothers of those men’s kids.

Either women are able to manage their bodies and wombs, or they’re not. If they are, no men should pay for the consequences of their decisions. If they’re not, and men are going to be held accountable for women’s actions, then men should be legally allowed to control all of women’s actions.

Don’t you just hate it when you’re minding your own sterile business and you suddenly learn that during your recent failed pregnancy you were pregnant with another woman’s baby, and that another woman successfully gave birth to your son?

Like, can you even? Because I can’t even and I’m a pretty good can evener.

I just can’t even with this one.

Daily Mail:

A couple who found out that another woman had given birth to their child after an IVF blunder has spoken out for the first time as they sue the esteemed fertility clinic.

Anni and Ashot Manukyan, an Armenian-American couple of Glendale, Los Angeles, were distraught last year when they had two embryos implanted at CHA Fertility Center, but it didn’t result in a pregnancy.

Months later, the knife was twisted: they were asked to come into the center for cheek swabs on April 11, which were passed off as a routine annual procedure.

The next day, they were called in again, this time met by a doctor and a psychologist who informed them that the swab was in fact a DNA test, confirming that they were the biological parents of a boy delivered by another couple, also patients at CHA, on March 31 in New York.

The New York couple, Anni and Ashot learned, had given birth to two boys, the other belonging to a third couple who’d had their embryos on ice at CHA.

It turned out the embryos Anni and Ashot had received months earlier had not belonged to them, and they faced an expensive and lengthy legal battle to bring their month-old son home.

Actually, I can even.

This is hilarious.

You have to learn to love the insanity of the world despite you not agreeing with it and fighting to change it, just as you have to learn to love to be alive despite not agreeing with everything in life because this is about imposing our will upon the world, not about being comfortable. It’s a struggle and it’s a fight and we have to be grateful for having a chance.

Be happy and thankful that worthy opponents that challenge you exist.

Modern-world problems such as another woman giving birth to your baby are a reminder about the need to correct our society, and by “correct our society” I mostly mean “removing Jews.”

The first step towards removing the Jews is resisting the Jews. In this particular case, the common-sense approach to resisting the Jews for women is to not waste their youth and fertility doing things that are not good for them long-term.

Women were not created for doing the things men do. If women were supposed to do what men do, they’d be men and not women. Women have a specific task that no one else can do and ignoring this task has a cost.

To the mother who carried her son, Anni said: ‘I pray for her every day. She was a victim of this as much as I am. She’s a lovely lady. She raised my baby inside of her and after he was born.’

The scandal was exposed when the Korean-American couple, who identified themselves only as YZ and AP in a lawsuit they filed against CHA last week, delivered two non-Asian boys in their home city of New York.

They had spent $100,000 on their fertility care and travel to CHA Fertility Center, which they had been assured was one of the top clinics in the country.

…

Their care and travel totaled $100,000. The average cost of one cycle of IVF is $12,000 plus up to $3,000 for the medication, though research shows couples rarely yield enough embryos on the first try.

Imagine spending $100,000 to get pregnant because you wasted your youth and fertility doing things women are not supposed to be doing when instead you could have had it for free.

It’s insane.

But it’s funny.

Writer Sarah Duguid did a piece for the Daily Mail detailing her investigation about the egg freezing industry in the United Kingdom that revealed that British women are paying more than £17,000 for a 70-80% chance of having a baby after about three decades of whoring around.

You can add this one to your list of reasons why women should not be allowed to choose anything.

Daily Mail:

The London Egg Bank, part of the London Women’s Clinic, a fertility centre based on Harley Street, is selling itself as the place for career women to get their eggs frozen.

This will, it is suggested, give them the chance to preserve their fertility, with the option of trying to conceive at a later date with eggs which have been put on ice when they’re younger – and are therefore better quality.

Egg Freezing 101 is a ticketed event that’s free to attend, as long as you sign up to the London Egg Bank website.

Guests are invited to join the ‘rapidly growing’ number of women who are choosing to freeze their eggs. The event promises to show women how egg freezing can help them, as well as giving them the enticement of discounts to the clinic’s services.

The surroundings are discreetly luxurious. Gold and black pendant lights hang in the reception area. Glass consulting rooms look as if they’d be more at home in a fashionable advertising agency than a hospital. With a teacup in one hand and biscuit in the other, the women are invited to gather around while they wait for the rest of the party. Everyone is handed an information folder containing price lists and a flyer for the clinic that reads: ‘Take Control.’

The majority of the guests are women on their own, although two have come with male partners, and one appears to be there with her mother.

Operations manager Marta Wolska takes the stage and begins the sales pitch. She explains that using the latest technique called vitrification – in which eggs are flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen rather than gradually lowered in temperature – 96 per cent of eggs that are frozen will survive defrosting.

Marta’s message is clear. Fertility declines with age, and by investing in egg freezing at a young age, a woman can defy Mother Nature and preserve her fertility for years to come.

If the women sign up today they’ll be offered a 30 per cent discount on all of the clinic’s services, from a fertility MOT at £370, to a three-cycle package of egg freezing at a full cost of £9,500.

For those women under 35, the clinic’s services are free if they sign up to the ‘freeze and share’ option – a new programme where women donate half of their ‘harvested’ eggs to the clinic, which will then sell them on at a cost of £10,700 to women unable to conceive with their own eggs.

The remaining half will be frozen for two years at no cost and then attract a £250 a year freezing fee after that. Marta boasts of the clinic’s flexible opening times – staff even work on Sundays.

Then, extraordinarily, she offers to escort any woman home after the egg harvesting treatment if they don’t have a partner or good friend to do it.

…

Once Marta has completed her talk, Kamal Ahuja, founder of the London Women’s Clinic, comes on stage. He is introduced as the doctor and his talk focuses on the great strides there have been in fertility medicine since he began his career in the 1980s.

While the women listen intently, there is one statistic that both presenters have remained conspicuously quiet about: the chances of actually giving birth to a baby using a frozen egg.

…

Eventually, he offers a statistic: if a woman has 50 eggs frozen, she will have a 70 to 80 per cent chance of having a baby.

Soon afterwards, he reveals that to gather 50 eggs would usually mean five cycles of egg collection. That is far more than most women could cope with, let alone afford (it would cost more than £17,000 for five cycles. And that cost is for freezing alone – it doesn’t include later fertilisation and implantation of embryos).

The author then talks about the process of egg collection.

It starts with more than a week’s worth of hormone injections to encourage the ovaries to produce multiple eggs (instead of just the one egg produced in a typical cycle).

When the eggs are mature and ready to be retrieved, the patient undergoes sedation and a needle is used to harvest the eggs. There have been rare cases of women bleeding so severely from the needle that they’ve had to have their ovaries removed.

What is even going on here with these whores? After getting tricked into imitating men, joining the workforce, and and succumbing to the temptation of the modern hedonistic lifestyle, they’re willing to pay close to £20,000 so they can continue being whores for longer.

The “Take Control” flyer is the icing on the deception cake. By putting off motherhood, women are giving away control because they’re losing fertility. Time is always ticking, and freezing their eggs doesn’t really give them any control back and instead gives the clinics control over their own fertility. Paying for it doesn’t change the fact that it is effectively giving away control. They literally give away their current fertility to someone else under the premise that they’ll get it back later on. Does that sound like taking control?

Eggs are just one part of the problem of decreasing fertility as women age. The entire female body is a baby-making machine, and focusing on freezing just one tiny but critical component of the machinery is not the same as freezing the machine itself. Their fertility goes away even if they freeze their eggs.

Women are not meant to have their first kid in their forties. That’s no way of keeping species alive, and it doesn’t even make sense in the context of our current society.

If women are told to do men stuff such as working and being independent, then why don’t they do that after being mothers and after their kids have grown? They literally have the rest of their lives to do PowerPoint presentations or whatever it is they do at their “jobs” after they lose their fertility. Why waste time with it while they’re fertile? Why waste their fertility?

Editor's Note: The answer of course is that it is about dick, not work. "I want to work on my career first" is femspeak for "I want to fuck a bunch of guys." -AA

Women having their first kid at 15 or 16 means they’d be in their early thirties once their eldest is an adult. Entering the workforce instead of entering motherhood in most cases means they’d be of grandma-age once they feel forced into motherhood later on, which is what is happening today with women aged 40 and up thinking they’re finally ready to become mothers.

That would be better than what we have now with all these whores getting dried up before freaking out and realizing they should urgently become mothers but it would probably make it harder for them to enter the workforce as grown adults because we have a retarded system where you’re asked for experience in order to get experience after having spent north of 20 years in the “education” system.

It’s not perfect, but it’s definitely better. Who cares if they never end up working anyways? Nothing of value would be lost.

Among some women, there is an air of quiet panic. Attractive and intelligent with good careers but finding themselves without committed partners, they are worried about the future. They know they want a family, but time is ticking on. They want an insurance policy.

Raquel, 38, is single and wants to freeze her eggs in case she meets someone in the next few years. She wants to buy time. She wants to be able to spend time getting to know a man rather than feel forced to rush into something.

Insanity. She had like 25 years to get to know a man. These whores are insane.

It’s sad to think the one thing women are good at is so demonized. Motherhood is their one thing. Everything else they do is either irrelevant or secondary to motherhood in importance. We need our womb-factories to be producing babies. The future needs our womb machines to function as womb machines, not repurposing them into caricatures of men.

But hey, it’s fine. If white women don’t produce white children, we can import brown people to do that. We can even import grown, ready-to-use brown men to start paying all of our pensions.

The West is run by loonies. This is now the land of the clowns.

It’s 2017, and the world suffers from a lack of Blacks.

Nobody is allowed to say it, of course, but everyone knows it. As you walk down the streets of major cities, you see faces – sad, sullen faces – haunted by the plummeting numbers of Blacks worldwide.

Fortunately, some trends are reversible.

Thanks to the wonders of modern medicine, we might be able to save the African race from the brink of extinction.

Fox News:

During nearly four decades of marriage, Akosua Budu Amoako and her husband tried to have a child, without success. But last month, at age 59, Budu gave birth to her first child after fertility treatments.

The full-term 7-pound, 4-ounce boy was born June 15 at Bellevue Woman’s Center in Niskayuna, near Albany. He’s named after his father, Isaiah Somuah Anim.

“They’re doing super, very well,” Dr. Khushru Irani, who delivered the baby, told The Associated Press on Monday. The couple, he added, “are so happy about the whole thing.”

Budu said she and her 59-year-old husband, who live in Schenectady, had tried for years to get pregnant naturally after they married 38 years ago, but they eventually stopped trying. Then last year, after learning that a 60-year-old woman in the couple’s homeland of Ghana gave birth to triplets after fertility treatments, the couple, both medical professionals at a local hospital, decided to try once again to have a child.

…

“Initially, when I saw her, I’m saying no, it’s not a good idea for your health to have a baby at your age,” the doctor said. “But they were very insistent and they wanted to try it out.”

Budu underwent in vitro fertilization at an Albany-area clinic using her husband’s sperm and a donor egg. The entire process, from initial screening to successful fertilization, cost $20,000 and took about a year, the elder Amin told the newspaper.

You know, I’ve always been a vocal opponent of Vladimir Putin’s state-sponsored eugenics program, since I believe that its end goal – to create a race of Aryan supersoldiers – defies the natural order. I am similarly skeptical of Jeremy Corbyn’s plan to synthesize a race-specific virus that targets people of the Jewish faith.

But here in the United States, science is clearly being used for good.

Can you imagine the joy that this woman felt, knowing that she just gave birth to the first Black baby born in America in five years?

This is Children of Men-tier stuff.

It’s an undeniable fact that the world cannot survive without Blacks, even if small-minded Nationalists like Putin and Corbyn think otherwise.

After all, we’re talking about a race so advanced that they invented electromagnetic pyramid spaceships before the wheel. They also invented the Super Soaker, which children of the 90s will appreciate.

Hopefully, we will be reading more reports like this one in the future as fertility treatments become cheaper and more available to Blacks of all ages.

We cannot allow them to become extinct.