Women must always be allowed to do whatever they want at any time, any place, and for any reason or no reason, and be totally shielded from any consequences.

It’s called “pussy power,” okay?

Get used to it.

DPA:

Dozens of women cycled topless through central Berlin on Saturday to protest regulations that prevent women from removing their tops in public parks unless they are in specially designated areas.

The event, held under the banner “No nipple is free until all nipples are free,” was held in a show of solidarity for a French woman who had not been allowed to sunbathe topless.

Park attendants had asked the woman, who lives in Berlin, to put a top on or leave the park, according to media reports. She was sunning herself near a children’s paddling pool.

The park attendants said the area was not designated for nudism. The woman’s refusal to put a top on led to a police operation and triggered a debate, particularly on social media.

A nationwide movement calling for “Equal Breasts for All” is now demanding woman have the right to go topless in places where men do so too.

“Women”? “Men”?

Hello?

The Dark Ages called and they want their words back. Gender doesn’t exist, and therefore breasts are neither male nor female – they are just disgusting sacks of human flab.

While it’s important for these women to rise up and destroy the patriarchy with rebellious acts against the establishment, it’s probably time to retire “my body, my choice.”

Although we understand the phrase to mean that a woman should be able to do sexual things however she wants, the phrase harkens back to the dangerous and outmoded patriarchal concept that human beings possess bodily autonomy. It has therefore been picked up by anti-vaxxers who falsely claim that the government doesn’t have the right to force vaccinate people.

Instead of “my body, my choice,” we ask that at future rallies, women fighting against the establishment to get back our rights to abortion, obesity, and public nudity instead use the phrase “pussy power,” or “diversity is our greatest strength.”

This is some kind of regret-nipple-rape where consent is removed after the fact.

USA Today:

In new age America, if you need emotional comfort, you can pay someone to cuddle you.

It’s legal and unregulated.

But where do you complain if a cuddling session goes too far?

A Phoenix woman says it happened to her in May when she visited an $80-a-session cuddle therapist and the session turned sexual. She wound up with the cuddler’s nipple in her mouth for five minutes.

She called police, who told her that nothing illegal had happened.

She called a national group that certifies cuddlers. It promptly decertified the cuddler, Susanne Woodward, for breaking its code of conduct.

Finally, she filed a complaint with the state board that regulates massage because the cuddler is also a massage therapist. It’s illegal for massage therapists to engage in sexual activity with clients.

But Woodward’s attorney, Flynn Carey, argued before the Arizona State Board of Massage Therapy that cuddling is beyond the board’s regulatory authority because the woman was a cuddle client, not a massage client.

…

The board found no violation of massage practice but ordered Woodward to separate her cuddling business from her massage business, including maintaining separate websites to avoid confusion.

What do they mean nothing illegal has happened?

Do I have to remind people that we’re living in current year?

The cuddle therapist was in a position of power over her cuddle-deprived client and took advantage of this to fulfill her own sick five-minute nipple-sucking desires at the cost of some innocent woman’s nipple-sucking innocence.

She literally penetrated the woman’s mouth with her erect nipple.

But the sick cuddle therapist is, in turn, a victim herself. This is literally the patriarchy manifesting itself in the women it has brainwashed and turning them into sick depraved nipple-sucking criminal rapists that nipple-rape innocent women in the mouth.

Professional cuddling – essentially paying someone to snuggle in a consensual, non-sexual manner – has been around about two decades. Professional cuddling can be one-on-one or in “cuddle parties,” where people wear pajamas, eat snacks, chat and snuggle.

The theory behind cuddle therapy is that people feel increasingly isolated and disconnected. Many were raised in families where platonic touching was uncommon and suffer from “touch deprivation.”

…

There is no professional licensing, but some companies offer training and even certification.

Cuddlist provides online training and certification for those who want to lead one-on-one cuddling. It has a code of conduct. Cuddling is a platonic service, the website says, where everyone must be clothed. At a minimum, they have to wear a tank top and shorts that extend to the mid-thigh.

Even human contact has turned into a consumer experience and been reduced to a monetary transaction in our hyper-materialist society.

The consumer lifestyle creates barriers between people and then asks you to pay more — consume more — in order to drill tiny holes in those barriers for you to get a glimpse of what could be and relieve a bit of the pain that this isolation causes.

It is worth noting that being pro-cuddle therapy would logically require one to also be pro-prostitution. People “touch deprived” are also sexually deprived.

In Arizona, the woman who filed the complaint said she began visiting Woodward in April at her Tempe business, Restoration Healing Spa.

Over two months she saw Woodward for four cuddle sessions.

“She told me she would be able to help me with my sexual trauma and help me find my voice,” the woman wrote in her complaint to state regulators. “She insisted that it would not be sexual and that clothing would be on at all times.”

…

The woman admitted in her complaint that in an early session with Woodward, she told the therapist it had always been her dream to be held naked by a woman.

She said Woodward told her she could do that, but that it was outside her boundaries as a cuddlist and “it would have to be between us.”

On her fourth cuddle session, the woman alleges Woodward told her, “I can hold you, how you want.”

Both woman removed their tops. Woodward told the woman to rest her head on Woodward’s breasts, according to the complaint.

“She then told me to suck her nipple,” the woman wrote, and the therapist said, “I am channeling nurturing energy to you through my breast.”

Then Woodward told her time was up, “but I will give you five extra minutes for free.”

In a later cuddle session, Woodward said the woman initiated contact with Woodward’s breast and the conduct was consensual.

Afterward, she said the woman smiled, said she was feeling “so good” and thanked Woodward. She scheduled another cuddle session for the next week.

Some humans dream of bringing Order and Prosperity to Earth, conquering Mars and setting off to explore the galaxy. Others dream of being held naked by a woman.

Both are worth the same, because we’re all equals.

Everything is the same as everything else.

People love to protest against the really important issues of our time, such as women not being allowed to freely display their breasts and nipples, and the climate not being exactly the same no matter what.

Daily Mail:

Dozens of nude models protested against the Facebook and Instagram ban on female nipples with New York City gathering that was coordinated by controversial artist Spencer Tunick.

This Spencer Tunick “artist” is a Jew.

Shocking, right?

In collaboration with the National Coalition Against Censorship, for their #WeTheNipple campaign, Tunick took photos of the models during a Sunday morning demonstration outside the Astor Place subway station in Manhattan.

Several photos show the naked men and women holding nipple signs in the air while lying on the ground.

The women were shielding their own nipples with images of male nipples that Tunick calls ‘donated nipples’.

Artists Andres Serrano and Paul Mpagi Sepuya, Bravo’s Andy Cohen, Red Hot Chili Peppers drummer Chad Smith and Tunick himself all donated photos of their nipples for the signs.

Other photos show the models standing in a group gripping the signs as Tunick captures every moment.

The protest came about after Facebook and Instagram banned photographic representations of the nude body.

Both social media platforms only allow nudity in depictions of paintings and sculpture. They do not allow nude photos.

But the problem is social media is where many artists share their work, with Instagram being the most popular. 

According to #WeTheNipple, social media ‘has dramatically increased artists’ ability to reach–and build–their audiences. Unless their medium is photography and their subject is the body’.

That lacks diversity. What about pornographers?

Why can’t they show their videos and pictures on Instagram and Facebook?

Though there are photos of barely covered breasts all over social media, it is still a big no-no for women to show their nipples.

However, photos of male nipples are fine.

Of course male nipples are fine, because the problem isn’t the nipple itself but the combination of nipple and breasts. Women don’t experience the same physiological response when seeing the naked male chest area that men experience when seeing the naked female chest area.

Women know that men like breasts.

They get breast implants and they attempt weird rituals to improve the shape of their breasts because having breasts that men like increases their power over them.

This is about power.

Everything is about power.

These “free the nipple” movements often sport the argument that female nipples are sexualized — that they’re only sexually arousing because of a cultural thing — and that they’ll stop being seen as something sexual once everyone’s used to seeing women’s nipples everywhere.

Although that argument ignores the biological differences between the sexes, it isn’t completely wrong.

Not because men finding fertile women’s breasts sexually appealing is a cultural thing — it’s not — but because of desensitization.

People who regularly watch porn eventually end up needing more “hardcore” imagery to get the same level of arousal they previously experienced with “softer” images.

People can develop tolerance towards drugs, which increases the dosage needed to experience the intended effects.

The same thing applies to sexual imagery.

Women who want the female nipple allowed to be displayed anywhere are falling into a trap.

They’d be gaining a temporary power that will last until men lose sensitivity.

After men become desensitized to the sight of the naked female breast, women would actually end up with a negative power balance.

At that point, they’d need to degrade themselves even further to provoke a male response — just like porn stars who are willing to do anything — and men will eventually become desensitized towards that too, prompting women to go further down the degenerate “hardcore” path.

No one should open the slippery slope box.

If you are a woman, you should ask yourself what you want to happen when you show your breasts to the man you love.

Do you want him to be indifferent or do you want him to have an erection?