I don’t know what’s more retarded – the fact that this is applauded by the same people who claim to believe in multiculturalism, or the fact that Britain already legally does far worse things to children with the tranny stuff with, again, the support of these exact same people.

The actual FGM operation itself doesn’t even have that many complications, and most of the ones that do happen are because the tools aren’t properly sterilized, which is what you’d expect from something mostly blacks and Arabs do.

Compared to the tranny stuff, it’s literally nothing.

The Guardian:

A woman has been found guilty of handing over a three-year-old British girl for female genital mutilation (FGM) during a trip to Kenya, in the first conviction of its kind.

After a trial at the Old Bailey, Amina Noor, 39, was convicted of assisting a Kenyan woman to carry out the procedure in 2006. The conviction, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years, is the first for assisting in such harm under the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003.

The only other successful prosecution under the act was in 2019 when a Ugandan woman from Walthamstow, east London, was jailed for 11 years for cutting a three-year-old girl.

From the previous conviction

Campaigners said the verdict showed that the introduction in 2015 of mandatory reporting of suspected FGM was working.

The senior crown prosecutor Patricia Strobino hailed Noor’s conviction, saying: “This kind of case will hopefully encourage potential victims and survivors of FGM to come forward, safe in the knowledge that they are supported, believed and also are able to speak their truth about what’s actually happened to them.

“It will also send a clear message to those prospective defendants or people that want to maintain this practice that it doesn’t matter whether they assist or practise or maintain this practice within the UK or overseas, they are likely to be prosecuted.”

Strobino added: “Part of the challenge of this type of offence is the fact that these types of offences occur in secrecy. Within specific communities within the UK, although these offences and practices are prevalent, it is often very difficult to get individuals to come forward to explain the circumstances of what’s happened to them because there was a fear that they may be excluded or pushed away or shunned, isolated from their community.”

Previously, the prosecutor Deanna Heer KC said Noor travelled to Kenya with the girl in 2006 and while there took her to a private house where the child was subjected to FGM.

The crime only came to light years later when the girl was 16 and confided in her English teacher at school.

When spoken to, the defendant said she thought the procedure was just an injection and that afterwards the girl was “happy and able to run around and play”. But when examined in 2019, it emerged that the girl’s clitoris had been removed.

Noor appeared “shocked and upset” and said that was not what she had thought was going to happen, Heer said. According to an initial account, Noor described going with another woman to a “clinic” where the girl was called into a room for a procedure.

…

Jurors were told the defendant was born in Somalia and moved to Kenya at the age of eight during the civil war in Somalia. She was 16 when she came to the UK and was later granted British citizenship.

The defendant described what had been done to the girl as “Sunnah”, meaning “tradition” or “way” in Arabic, and said it was a practice that had gone on for cultural reasons for many years.

There are all kinds of problems here.

How is she convicted of a British crime committed in a country where the act is illegal? She’s convicted for traveling there?

How is that the law?

The other thing is: “female genital mutilation” is literally the same thing as male circumcision. They cut a pleasure center off the genitals, then claim it’s about hygiene.

Jews are obviously not being prosecuted for doing this to boys, are they?

It’s just more Islamophobia, coming from a government that supports the wholesale slaughter of Palestinian children.

No connection to the article

The Islamic practice of female genital mutilation has always been a difficult issue for feminists and Jews alike.

For feminists, it’s obviously very illiberal and dis-empowering to cut out off parts of women’s genitals and sew their labia together, but it raises the obvious question – what about male circumcision?

It is exactly the same thing – you remove a part of the genitals that it is intended for sexual pleasure so that that child, when it becomes an adult, she or he will have less fulfilling sexual experiences. There also appears to be an intent to inflict ritual torture/trauma on the child.

The media has attempted to use different names to argue that one is bad and the other is good – “genital mutilation” for girls, “circumcision” for boys. However, Moslems call the former “female circumcision,” and men’s rights advocates call the latter “male genital mutilation.”

The male version is arguably worse, because men’s genitalia is outside of their body, so anytime they are in a locker room or an intimate situation with a woman from a country where this is not performed, it’s like “wow, what’s wrong with your dick?”

Moslems at least do this equally – mutilating the genitals of boys and girls alike. You gotta give them that. Jews only do it to boys. America is the only country where it is done to non-Jewish boys, because of Jewish influence on the American medical industry and culture generally. Jewish doctors (and some weird puritan Christians, to be fair) sold this to America, saying it would make boys less likely to masturbate.

Feminists obviously don’t care about men’s rights. That’s the whole point of their thing. However, when they start making too much noise about the issue of female genital mutilation, they eventually wind up arguing that it is a violation of human rights to cut off parts of a child’s genitals.

This makes some people very uncomfortable.

Judge Friedman is one of those people.

CNN:

A Detroit judge has dropped nearly all the charges against a Michigan doctor accused of performing female genital mutilation on at least nine underage girls, according to court documents.

In a decision filed Tuesday, Judge Bernard Friedman ruled that the federal female genital mutilation law is unconstitutional and that Congress did not have the right to criminalize the practice, and therefore he dismissed six of eight charges in the United States’ first federal case involving the procedure.

“Congress overstepped its bounds by legislating to prohibit [female genital mutilation],” Friedman wrote, calling it a “local criminal activity” for the states to regulate, not Congress.

And then, I told the goyim that Congress overstepped its bounds!

Finally, one brave rat-faced judge finally found the point at which Congress had overstepped its bounds – telling people not to mutilate children’s genitals.

Dr. Jumana Nagarwala is the lead defendant in the case. While the charges of conspiring to commit and committing female genital mutilation, as well as aiding and abetting others in doing so, have been dropped, Nagarwala still faces charges of conspiring to travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct and conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding. She was charged alongside Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, his wife, Farida Attar, and five other residents of Michigan and Minnesota.

Her attorney, Shannon Smith, said she and Nagarwala are thrilled with Friedman’s decision.

“He wrote a well-reasoned opinion and we are happy to see that his conclusion about the constitutionality of the law matched our analysis as well,” Smith said Tuesday. “My client is ecstatic, but she’s still nervous because she still faces other charges in federal court.”

Female genital mutilation refers to “all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for cultural or other nonmedical reasons,” according to the United Nations Population Fund. While it is performed for myriad sociological, cultural, religious, hygienic and socioeconomic reasons, it is banned by law in at least 44 countries, including the United States. The World Health Organization considers the procedure a human rights violation.

Interesting.

Do they consider this to be a human rights violation?

Because that would be anti-Semitic.

But surely, that’s not the reason WHO would give. That is too close to saying “we’re controlled by the Jews.”

So, why is it not a human rights violation to remove the foreskin of a baby boy’s penis and suck the blood out of it, World Health Organization?

This is why feminists are told to just forget about this and go back to attacking white men. It raises a very obvious question about Jewish blood magick rituals.

This is absolute barbarism, this cutting up of babies’ genitals.

But here we are in current year when you’re not allowed to legally spank a child without being charged with abuse… and the government says it’s illegal to stop someone from chopping up genitals of infants.

Many nationalists believe that Wales is the United Kingdom’s last bastion of sanity.

And yes, it’s true that little ol’ Cymru lacks the extreme poz of England, the ultra liberal politics of Scotland and the religious turmoil of Northern Ireland. Not to mention that the BASED gentleman that plowed into those devout Moslems in 2017, Darren Osborne, was a proud Welshman.

But the rot has affected the south of Wales for some time now. Entire areas of its capital city, Cardiff, are trash-strewn Islamic ghettos that are indistinguishable from Pakistan or Bangladesh.

And we all know what happens when Moslems gain a foothold in a nation: more Moslems, more mosques, more Arabic signs, more terrorism and – if you’re lucky – even a little dose of FGM.

Breitbart:

Wales is opening its first-ever female genital mutilation (FGM) clinic to provide medical and psychological help to victims of the practice imported from Africa and Asia.

Wales is the second-smallest of the Home Nations which make up the United Kingdom, with a population of only around three million and relatively low level of immigration compared to neighbouring England — which already has five FGM clinics.

Nevertheless, figures obtained by the BBC show maternity staff in Wales were discovering a new FGM case once every three days, on average, in 2016, with the Welsh Women’s Aid charity estimated that there are at least 2,000 victims in the country.

The emergence of FGM in Britain has been one of the unfortunate downsides of the embrace of state-sponsored multiculturalism following race riots in the 1980s.

The practice is most often associated with Islamic migration, being obligatory in the Shafi’i school of Islamic jurisprudence, which is influential in Africa and also strongly promoted by the Ulema Council in Indonesia, which is the world’s largest Muslim-majority country by population.

…

The National Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) estimates there are as many as 137,000 victims of FGM throughout the United Kingdom.

However, the authorities have yet to bring a single successful prosecution for the practice since it was criminalised more than 30 years ago, with the police making a number of dubious statements with respect to the crime being “nuanced” and arrests “unlikely to benefit [the] child” — generating significant public backlash, but no observable changes.

Strewth m80s. Did you ever think you’d see such tantalizing enrichment in Wales’ green and pleasant land?

All of the victims of FGM are going to be Moslem females, and I couldn’t care less about their well-being. In fact, anything that reduces the sexual pleasure of these over-breeding savages gets 1,488 thumbs up from me.

The problem, of course, is what these clinics represent: the ongoing Islamification of a white First World nation.

Inside a “Welsh” mosque.

Moreover, Wales has some of the worst socialized healthcare in Europe. It’s now common for Welsh people to wait upwards of 12 hours for emergency treatment due to increasingly severe NHS budget cuts.

Yet those financial limitations seem to vanish when a Moslem asks the Welsh government to open a medical clinic that provides an illegal vagoo-cutting service.

It’s almost like all aspects of British society (government, police, NHS) have two separate budgets at their disposal: a limited one for the “old” white Brits that is used to persecute them, and a surplus one for the “new” colored Brits that is used to aid their conquest of the island.

As a veteran skin-hater who has nothing but contempt for darkies, I couldn’t care less about the “crisis” of genital mutilation among men and women of color. In fact, anything that reduces the sexual pleasure of these over-breeding subhumans gets two thumbs up from me.

Heck, I reckon a huge portion of the adult white female population in the West would also benefit from the services of a voodoo shaman and his trusty scalpel. I mean, a lot of White Supremacists believe that these out-of-control, nigger-loving skanks should be kept in cages and forced to drink water from dog bowls with their names on them, which I guess is a nice, safe, “moderate” position.

But skanks can escape from cages and forget their place.

Genital mutilation, on the other hand, is a permanent reminder that The Man is in charge!

Quite a loose vagina you’ve got there, Stacey. Would be a shame if someone stitched it up.

Breitbart:

The threat of female genital mutilation (FGM) in the heavily migrant-populated Seine-Saint-Denis area in the suburbs of Paris could affect as many as 30 per cent of the children in the area, according to a French sociologist.

French sociologist and director of the Group for the Abolition of Sexual Mutilation (GAMS), Isabelle Gillette-Faye has claimed that the prevalence of FGM in the suburbs of Paris, often referred to as no-go areas, in the Île-de-France region are concerning.

Gillette-Faye said that the practice often involved much older children than in other regions of the world where FGM occurs in an interview with the region’s official website.

“In general, they undergo mutilations of type 2, that is to say, the removal of the clitoris and labia minora,” Gillette-Faye said.

The sociologist added that in France many victims are forced to go overseas to have the operation, often before they are forced into marriages.
In order to combat the spread of FGM, Gillette-Faye and her group GAMS, have been able to train medical practitioners and social workers to identify cases and work with authorities.

“We will be relieved when we have left circumcision two to three generations behind us. Families living in France are often resistant, as social and traditional pressures are very strong, and it is often the family remaining in the [original] country that decides.”

Okay, in all seriousness, you probably don’t agree with FGM. Most civilized people don’t.

But here’s something everyone can agree with: the only way to prevent it from increasing in Paris is to let in tens of millions more coloreds until they become the absolute majority.

I know that sounds strange at first, like when the media says that England would not be English without its Somalis or that Ramadan is a proud Swedish tradition.

But when you really think about it, goyim, it starts to make sense.

At some point, European states are going to give up the absurd hoax that they are going to replace their entire populations with Moslems but that their countries aren’t going to become Moslem countries.

Germany has already done a lot in terms of reverse assimilation. They tell girls to dress differently – the government has paid for ads telling women to wear hijab. Germany and other places in Europe have banned pork. Most European school children learn Islamic prayers.

But you’ll know the switch from “multiculturalism” to “well I guess we’re all just going to have to accept Islam” has happened when they start defending FGM the same way they defend MGM: “oh it’s healthy and safer because it reduces diseases and plus other reasons somehow.”

RT:

Germany experienced a sharp increase in the number of women who have been subjected to genital mutilation, which is illegal in the country, an advocacy group has said. There are now more than 58,000 women affected by FGM, 10,000 more than the year before.

The estimate was published Tuesday by the women’s rights organization, Terre des Femmes, who said the increase was largely due to the influx of migrants from countries where female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced.

“Due to the arrival of migrants from countries such as Eritrea, Somalia and Iraq, we have recorded a huge increase in the number of affected women and threatened girls,” said spokeswoman Charlotte Weil to DPA Tuesday, as cited by The Local.

Furthermore, there is currently more than 13,000 girls in Germany who are at risk of being forced into the procedure by their families, a 4,000 increase over last year, the group said.

“We don’t know of any cases where a girl was mutilated in Germany. It either takes place on a holiday back in their homeland, or during a visit to a practitioner in a city such as Paris or Amsterdam,” Weil added.

FGM is illegal in Germany, but is tolerated in many African countries as well as some in Asia. More than 200 million women worldwide are affected by female genital mutilation, according to Unicef.

While culturally entrenched in some countries, FGM is widely criticized by many health professionals and rights groups. The procedure may cause health problems depending on how exactly it is performed and has no health benefits.

JUST A NOTE HERE: “NO HEALTH BENEFITS” DOESN’T STOP THEM FROM MUTILATING LITTLE BABY BOY’S DICKS THOUGH DOES IT???

I can promise you that the German women calling these men in are sexually aroused by this news.

This is your world ruled by women. Your no war paradise.

Dear German men: your granddaughters won’t have clits.

But if you won’t stand up and fight based on what you already know, that little factoid isn’t going to change anything, is it?

Why on earth would these people do the same thing they were doing at home after they had been moved to a different geological location?

BBC:

More than 600 new victims of female genital mutilation (FGM) have been identified in seven months in the West Midlands.

Hospital statistics revealed there were 632 new cases between September 2014 and March 2015, a report from the West Midlands Police and Crime Panel said.

Between January and November last year 118 cases were referred to the West Midlands force.

A new task force to tackle mutilation was being launched, the panel said.

Further work could be carried out to consider “how to achieve best outcomes in tackling FGM”, it said.

This situation points to just how idiotic and childish SJWs are. They literally expect that once you move someone from one geographical location to another, their behavior magically changes.

Why would that happen?

What is the reasoning?

What type of evidence exists to support the theory?

The fact that the establishment flips out about this but continues to allow legal male genital mutilation also demonstrates the fact we are living in a matriarchy, where boys simply do not matter.

Blacks are physically very different from Whites. One of those differences is the consistency of their skin. It is much thicker and drier than White skin and does not cut or bruise so easily. It is therefore far more resilient to thorns and brambles and is perfectly suited for living naked in the wild under a hot sun.

From the Daily Mail:

From delicate swirls of raised flesh to intricate dotted patterns, the scars that decorate the bodies of Ethiopia’s Bodi, Mursi and Surma tribes are more than just the sign of an old injury.

For these aren’t just any scars: They’re an elaborate part of local culture and signify everything from beauty to adulthood or even, in some cases, are simply a mark of belonging.

But Ethiopian tribes aren’t the only ones to embrace scarification. In Uganda, the Karamojong are famous for their elaborate scar patterns, while across Ethiopia’s border with Sudan, Nuer men bear scarred foreheads and consider getting them a key part of the transition from boy to man.

Now the stunning scar markings of Ethiopia and Sudan are the subject of an incredible set of photographs by French snapper, Eric Lafforgue, who travelled through the country observing cutting ceremonies and meeting the locals.

During a visit to the Surma tribe, who live in the country’s remote Omo Valley, he witnessed a scarification ceremony, which involved creating the patterns using thorns and a razor.

‘The12-year-old girl who was being cut didn’t say a word during the 10-minute ceremony and refused to show any pain,’ he revealed. ‘Her mother used a thorn to pull the skin out and a razor blade to cut the skin.

‘At the end, I asked her whether having her skin cut had been tough and she replied that she was close to collapse. It was incredible as she didn’t show any sign of pain on her face during the ceremony as that would have been seen as shameful for the family.’

What’s more, he explained, despite the pain, the girl herself initiated the ceremony as Surma girls aren’t obliged to take part. ‘Scars are a sign of beauty within the tribe,’ he added.

‘Children who go to school or convert to Christianity don’t do it but the others see the ability to cope with pain as a sign that they will be able to cope with childbirth in future.’

Other tribes who live in the Omo Valley, among them the Bodi, also embrace scarification and often use sap or ash to make the resulting wounds more prominent when they heal.

But it seems that not everyone is impressed. ‘People wearing scarifications are seen as “primitives” by many urban Ethiopians and suffer from this,’ Lafforgue explains. ‘Those who have had them but have been to school as well often try to hide them.’

Others, such as the Mursi tribe, consider scars a sign of beauty and strength, although as Lafforgue relates, thanks to an influx of workers from other parts of Ethiopia, scarification is becoming an increasingly risky business.

‘Using shared blades is a huge problem in the south Omo region,’ explains Lafforgue. ‘Hepatitis is starting to become a problem as workers from other parts of Ethiopia arrive to work on the new giant [government-sponsored] plantations. AIDS is also becoming a threat.’

Despite the risks, scarification continues to play a huge role in tribal life, not least across the border in South Sudan where scars are a distinctive feature of life for the Nuer people.

South Sudan’s second largest ethnic group after the Dinka, the majority of adult Nuer men have ‘gaar’ markings – six lines carved on either side of their foreheads – as a sign of maturity.

Other Nuer, particularly the Bul Nuer of the Nile Valley, create a dotted version of gaar and women sometimes have them too. The neighbouring Toposa tribe, which lives in both Ethiopia and South Sudan has also embraced scarification but combine facial dot patterns with elaborate body etchings as well.

Although the Toposa etchings remain popular with younger generations, the Nuer’s gaar markings are becoming increasingly rare as conflict between them and other South Sudanese tribes becomes more frequent.

‘This tradition isn’t done as much anymore,’ explains Lafforgue. ‘Partly, it’s because of better education and the increasing number of people who have turned to Christianity but also because it is a too visible sign of tribal belonging in an area that has suffered many disputes.’

Traditions like this prove that Blacks are a different species to Whites. They do not feel pain in the same way that we do.

If a 12-year-old White girl was to try that she would faint with the pain.

I can’t wait for some Wiggers to have a go at this.

More than 110 cases of female genital mutilation have been recorded in Bristol last year. North Bristol NHS Trust reported 117 women, who used its hospitals during 2013, were found to have already had the operation.

Experts fear the real number of women at risk of FGM living in Bristol who have had the horrific operation, where the clitoris is either removed or narrowed by stitches, is around 2,000.

Layla Ismail, of Whitehall, has been a long-standing campaigner against the practice.

The 39-year-old was born in Somalia, where FGM was common practice for girls.

Her younger sister was rushed into hospital after having the procedure with a worrying night where they were unsure if she would pull through.

The mother-of-five moved to Bristol in 1995 to be with her husband who was studying at the University of Bristol and said information about FGM was non-existent back then.

She said: “The doctors never told me anything about it, it wasn’t something the community would talk about,” said Mrs Ismail, who now works as a community worker for Forward to educate people about the practice.

“I run groups where people can support each other.

“It helps to have people around they can discuss ideas with.

“It is not a religious act; how can something that harms people be religious?

“We are told we are not allowed tattoos because it damages the body but then people practise this.”

Her group not only offers support for women but also engages with men and religious leaders.

Despite there being cases of FGM in Bristol it is understood most girls are taken back to their country of origin for the operation, which is normally performed by people’s local doctors or nurses.

To date Avon and Somerset Police have made no arrests for FGM.

Assistant mayor for public health Barbara Janke said: “Much progress has been made in Bristol and around the world to change perceptions about this practice in communities where girls and women are at risk.

“The majority of victims are girls aged under 10, who cannot speak up for themselves.”

Thursday is the international day for Zero Tolerance to FGM and to mark the occasion a range of activities will be taking place in Bristol.

Police officers in London have arrested two people over the genital mutilation of a baby girl, it has been reported.

The alleged criminals live in Britain and the baby is believed to have been mutilated at five to six weeks old – believed to be the youngest case reported.

Female genital mutilation involves the cutting or removal of female sexual tissue and has been illegal in the UK since 1985.

However, because a culture of secrecy surrounds the procedure, no one in the UK has ever been prosecuted for the crime, but officers hope this case could lead to the first.

Police have submitted a file to prosecutors but doubts remain because, although the little girl is now a British national, it is not known if she was at the time.

Despite the high number of cases – 80 so far this year – nobody has yet been prosecuted for the practice.

Last month the Crown Prosecution Service said it is studying five case files passed on by the Metropolitan Police.

Read More