It’s our job to dry up those big, leaky beaner tears.

It’s not only our responsibility, as Americans, to welcome the poor and stupid people of the entire world and give them infinity everything. No. It’s also our responsibility to make sure their feelings are left unviolated.

If anything the government does ever hurts the delicate feelings of brown people, then naturally it must do everything in its power to make amends and make them feel good feelings again.

The feelings of illegal invaders are infinitely more important than petty things like the law – or White people’s tax dollars.

New York Times:

A federal judge has ruled that the government must provide mental health services to thousands of migrant parents and children who experienced psychological harm as a result of the Trump administration’s practice of separating families.

The decision, issued late Tuesday, marks a rare instance of the government being held legally accountable for mental trauma brought about by its policies — in this case, border security measures that locked thousands of migrant parents in detention while their children were placed in government shelters or foster homes.

The government is responsible for the “mental trauma” (hurt feelings) inflicted on criminals as it enforces the country’s laws.

Don’t worry though – this innovative line of thinking won’t be applied to White people who got their doors busted down at 3am for making a mistake on their tax return or whatever. It’s only something that applies to brown people who don’t have American citizenship and illegally entered the country.

“This is truly groundbreaking,” Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, said of the decision. “The court is recognizing that when a government creates a danger that inflicts trauma, the government is responsible for providing a solution. It is not something I have seen a court do before.”

Judge John A. Kronstadt of the United States District Court in Los Angeles ordered the federal government to immediately make available mental health screenings and treatment to thousands of families forcibly separated under the policy, which was primarily carried out in 2017 and 2018 — though hundreds of similar separations still occur.

In his ruling, Judge Kronstadt referred to previous federal cases that found that governments can be held liable when with “deliberate indifference” they place people in dangerous situations. In the past, the “state-created danger” doctrine has been applied when a police officer ejected a person from a bar late at night in very cold weather, or when a public employer failed to address toxic mold that caused workers to fall ill.

In this case, the judge said, the Trump administration could be held accountable for the enduring psychological harm brought about by forcibly taking children from their parents at the border with no guarantee of when or how they would be reunited.

If you’re going to say that the government is responsible for protecting the feelings of foreigners engaged in hostile and illegal actions against America, then it isn’t much of a stretch to say that we should be offering money and support to the families of enemy soldiers killed in wars.

I mean, isn’t it ultimately the same thing?

These insane judges are continuously ruling that the American government has no right to actually enforce its laws in any way if it offends foreign brown people or might discourage them from illegally coming over the border.

How is this not treason?

Another day, another thing Donald Trump is trying to do being cockblocked by another kike federal judge.

It just never ends.

If this wasn’t happening, Trump would be getting shit done. Seriously. No joke. If he was allowed to do all the things he’s tried to do, we’d be doing fantastic. And if he’d been allowed to do all those things, he’d be doing even more things.

Huffington Post:

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census, a win for critics who say the question is unnecessary and would cause fewer immigrants and minorities to respond to the decennial survey.

The Trump administration is expected to swiftly appeal the Tuesday ruling from U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York.

Several states and activists said immigrants, fearful of volunteering their immigration status to the Trump administration, would refuse to respond. The plaintiffs in the suit ― 18 states, the District of Columbia, several cities and a handful of immigrant rights groups ― argued the Trump administration intended to drive down the response rate among those groups when it added the question and ran afoul of a federal statute requiring them to rationally consider evidence and input before making a policy decision.

In his opinion, Furman wrote the way the Trump administration added the question violated the federal statute, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The law, Furman wrote, requires agencies to carefully study an issue before it implements or changes a policy. The Trump administration failed to do that in adding the citizenship question and the public rationale given by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees the Census Bureau, Furman said, was “pretextual.”

“Most blatantly, Secretary Ross ignored, and violated, a statute that requires him, in circumstances like those here, to collect data through the acquisition and use of ‘administrative records’ instead of through ‘direct inquiries’ on a survey such as the census,” Furman wrote.

Oh so it’s not even racism that is the excuse. It’s some vague thing about… not examining the issue enough.

This sort of thing is why so many people said that American law should be based on English Common Law or Roman Law or something. Anything other than the Talmud.

The obvious reason they don’t want the illegals on the census is because Congressional districts are based on census numbers, and if illegals count as “people,” then you’re going to get extra congressmen for Democrat districts flooded with illegals.

That is to say that while every state only gets two Senators, areas get House representation proportional to the number of people living there. The more people you have, the more sway you have in the House.

This map shows the 2010 adjustments:

Beyond that, they’ve been saying “11 million” for 25 years, even as they admit that at certain point since then there were a million people coming across every year.

In all likelihood, the actual number of illegals is probably closer to 30 million. And everyone is speculating with numbers between 25 and 50, but as long as there is no census, no one actually knows.

Of course, even with a census, you wouldn’t actually know. They wouldn’t all answer. But enough of them would.

These people are on average very stupid with such things. Remember that caravaner who was interviewed by Fox and said that he’d been kicked out of the US for attempted murder?

He was under no obligation to divulge that information and presumably was coached not to and must have just forgotten.

So a census would bring back some number much higher than 11 million.

It’s totally unclear how a judge is even involved in something like this, but it always is unclear why random judges are allowed to order the President to do things.

But remember goyim: we don’t have liberal or conservative judges, only “dedicated” judges.

Each and every judge in America has no political motivation whatsoever, the only thing they have is dedication.

Regrettably, that “dedication” is to the Jewish globalist agenda.

The future of our nation must rest on these brave souls.

The most basic principle of politics is that the best people must take the decisions for the rest of society. All political systems mainly differ in how they select who the “best” people are.

In aristocracy, rulers are selected based on their military prowess.

In fascism, rulers are selected based on a merit-based system.

In libertarianism, rulers are selected based on how good they are at managing businesses in a free market economy.

In democracy, rulers are selected by getting women, retards and convicted felons to vote in a popularity contest.

Most credible experts agree that democracy is the worst political system ever devised.

This has been known for thousands of years.

Tampa Bay Times :

The state of Florida routinely violates the constitutional rights of its citizens by permanently revoking the “fundamental right” to vote for anyone convicted of a felony, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

If murderers, thieves and gang-bangers have a “fundamental right” to make major decisions affecting the destiny of the nation, then maybe it’s time to get rid of that retarded concept.

Besides, when did this even become a thing? Initially, only free, land-owning White males had a “right” to vote. I guess “fundamental rights” change according to the whims of federal judges.

Did the founding fathers give criminals a “fundamental right” to vote?

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker said the Florida “scheme” unfairly relies on the personal support of the governor for citizens to regain the right to vote. In a strongly-worded ruling, he called the state’s defense of voter disenfranchisement “nonsensical,” a withering criticism of Gov. Rick Scott, the lead defendant in the case.

It’s “nonsensical” to prevent felons from voting. This guy literally can’t make sense of this concept.

This is the caliber of human material that’s being promoted to be the arbiter of the law in this country.

The worst people in America are put in charge of our legal system.

“Florida strips the right to vote from every man and woman who commits a felony,” Walker wrote. “To vote again, disenfranchised citizens must kowtow before a panel of high-level government officials over which Florida’s governor has absolute veto authority. No standards guide the panel. Its members alone must be satisfied that these citizens deserve restoration … The question now is whether such a system passes constitutional muster. It does not.”

Stripping criminals of their right to vote is obviously a good thing, as is preventing the mentally ill or stupid people from doing the same.

The reason this is an issue, of course, is that criminals and stupid people tend to be Black, and they tend to vote Democrat.

And since the definition of democracy is “whatever is good for the Jews,” this is obviously very problematic.

Scott’s office issued a statement late Thursday, hinting at an appeal.

“The discretion of the clemency board over the restoration of felons’ rights in Florida has been in place for decades and overseen by multiple governors,” said a statement attributed to Scott’s communications director, John Tupps. “The process is outlined in Florida’s Constitution, and today’s ruling departs from precedent set by the United States Supreme Court.”

These federal courts are completely out of control. They’re transparently interfering with the country and the will of the people, ignoring the law, the constitution and common sense.

While it’s good that Trump is filling up the courts with conservative judges, the system where any random judge can override decisions made by the states or the President needs to be reformed urgently.

Pictured: typical abortion doctor.

While you may not be aware of this, one of the core values embodied in the US constitution is the right, indeed, the duty, to slaughter babies at will. How can anyone be truly free unless they can kill a baby? Obviously, they can’t.

As such, it’s only natural that the wise men and women who constitute America’s Federal judiciary would block any law preventing or even making more difficult the wholesale slaughter of the unborn.

Where would our precious freedoms be without these great Judges?

NPR:

A federal judge in Texas has overturned a ban on a commonly used second trimester abortion procedure, dealing another blow to efforts to restrict abortion in that state.

U.S. District Court Judge Lee Yeakel’s ruling followed a temporary injunction issued in August preventing Texas from outlawing the procedure known as dilation and evacuation, often referred to as “D&E.” That injunction came on the day before the ban was to have gone into effect.

Lee Yeakel wants you to start killing your babies, and he’ll tell you when to stop.

The Texas law, known as Senate Bill 8 and signed by Gov. Greg Abbott earlier this year, was challenged in a lawsuit brought by abortion providers. They argued that the ban would require women seeking to terminate their pregnancies to undergo additional “unnecessary, invasive, and potentially painful medical procedures, in order to access their constitutional right to an abortion,” before beginning a D&E procedure.

This is complete nonsense. The constitution doesn’t guarantee the “right” to kill your child. This notion is based on pure Jewish bullshit. The whole argument is basically “the 14th Amendment guarantees due process, therefore infinity abortions.”

It’s sick that the system allows arbitrary Judicial decisions made decades ago to override the will of the people, the constitution and justice itself. America is ruled by a tyranny of unelected judges.

“The court is unaware of any other medical context that requires a doctor — in contravention of the doctor’s medical judgment and the best interest of the patient — to conduct a medical procedure that delivers no benefit to the woman,” Judge Yeakel wrote.

The judge’s ruling comes on the day his temporary injunction was to have expired.

Abortion and birth control are key aspects of the Jew’s agenda. Without them, feminism would, for all intents and purposes, be impossible to implement in practice. As such, they must be enshrined within the system by all means necessary.

If women fell pregnant as a result of slutting around, their ability to do so would be almost completely eliminated and traditional marriage would remain the default in the entire world. For this reason, the Daily Stormer is firmly opposed to abortion no matter how many nigger babies bite it as a result.

If White men were still in charge of our civilization, it wouldn’t matter how many Black babies were born, because they’d all be born in Africa instead of here.

Christians can’t be fair in applying the law – unlike Jews.

Regardless of anything else Trump will or won’t do, if he can fill up the many free federal judge positions with conservative gentiles instead of Jews and subversives, that would have made his 2016 victory a net gain for America.

After all, even now, the judicial branch is one of the biggest obstacles to Trump’s populist agenda. They keep cockblocking him on everything he does, under the flimsiest of legal pretenses.

Naturally, the Jews, who spent decades filling up these positions with their people, are panicking at the prospect of having a new wave of conservative Christian federal judges. It would be a major set-back to their agenda of destroying the remaining power of the US constitution.

But the shocking thing is that the Jews are now openly saying that having Christian judges is unacceptable. The liberal elites are so far gone, so disconnected from the people, that they probably think that this is a reasonable argument.

Daily Mail:

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee want to block a Trump administration judicial nominee because of his conservative Christian views.

By that standard, of course, the very men who wrote the constitution wouldn’t be qualified to be judges.

How could such bigots be fair and objective when deciding on issues such as gay marriage and refugee resettlement?

President Donald Trump tapped Jeff Mateer as a lifetime federal judge. But comments he has made on same-sex marriage and transgender rights are upsetting Democrats Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, according to The Dallas Morning News.

“There’s no question these views cast serious doubt on his ability to fairly enforce federal law and treat people impartially,” Feinstein said in a statement.

Unlike Jews, of course, who are known to treat people impartially with no thought of their own ethnic interest.

What would we be without these wise and fair Jews controlling everything?

Feinstein was recently critical of the religious faith of another judicial nominee. She suggested Amy Barrett’s Roman Catholicism would interfere with her ability to be fair as a Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judge.

“Republicans have lowered the standard for federal judges to get ones who will pass their ideological test: opposition to sensible gun laws, hostility to women’s reproductive rights, commitment to protecting political dark money, and disregard for public health and safety protections,”Whitehouse said, suggesting that Mateer was a “new low” and “not normal” for his criticism of transgender rights and same-sex marriage.

In other words, the only people qualified to be judges are atheists and Jews who oppose the first and second amendments and are on board with the globalist agenda to destroy America’s industries.

CNN first reported that Mateer, who works for the Texas attorney general’s office, said the transgender movement was part of “Satan’s plan” and described same-sex marriage as a thin wedge that could lead to normalizing bestiality and polygamy, which he called “disgusting.”

DEUS VULT!

Mateer has also worked as an advocate with the First Liberty Institute, a non-profit that defends people who believe they are victims of religious discrimination.

In other words, exactly the kind of people Jews don’t want in a top judiciary position.

The founding fathers, as well as the vast majority of modern Americans, belong to the Christian faith. And yet these Jews have the audacity to claim that this is somehow a disqualifying factor for being an arbiter of Law and morality. Can you imagine the hubris?

Would you let this man watch over your kids? Your dog? Your pet rock?

In my naivete, I didn’t think there were worse cucks in the US government than John McCain or Paul Ryan. But Trump’s removal agenda is making the most despicable traitors crawl out of the woodwork to foolishly oppose him in some futile gesture.

Cucks are senselessly throwing themselves into the meat grinder.

It’s still unclear why this newest slimeball thinks he can succeed in derailing Trump’s agenda where the Attorney General failed instantly.

Politico:

President Donald Trump’s travel ban executive order suffered its most severe legal blow to date Friday, as a federal judge in Seattle blocked the impact of the directive nationwide.

U.S. District Court Judge James Robart ruled in favor of the attorneys general of Washington state and Minnesota on a lawsuit they brought seeking to overturn the order limiting travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries.

“The state has met its burden in demonstrating immediate and irreparable injury,” Robart said, according to local press reports.

Who is this “Robart” fellow? Is he a Jew?

I haven’t been able to ascertain his ethnic origin one way or the other.

What I have been able to ascertain, however, is that if Robart isn’t Jewish, he’s the most servile shabbos goy I’ve ever seen.

This guy is attacking old men over imaginary crimes alleged committed nearly a century ago.

He’s siding with Black criminals over the police.

Moreover, he seems to be making non-stop references to Jews and their suffering, as a matter of course.

Look at this quote from a Law360:

U.S. District Judge James Robart nearly doubled the amount the city owes to Rosie’s owners in legal fees, and sharply criticized attorney Shannon Ragonesi, who represented the city, for calling the plaintiffs’ attempts to have a criminal case filed against two police who killed Rosie a “persecution,” the paper reported.

“The treatment of the Jews by the Pharaohs in ancient Egypt, that was a persecution. What Nazi Germany did in the Third Reich, that is a persecution,” Robart said, adding $50,000 in attorneys’ costs and fees to $51,000 the city had previously agreed to pay the couple.

His Jew masters seem constantly on his mind.

Robart – nothing but a mindless golem.

This is the kind of man we’re dealing with here. Anyway, back to the Politico article:

The temporary ruling from Robart, an appointee of President George W. Bush, appeared to be the most sweeping legal rebuke to the order since Trump issued it a week ago.

“Judge Robart’s decision, effective immediately, effective now, puts a halt to President Trump’s unconstitutional and unlawful executive order. It puts a stop to it immediately, nationwide,” Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson told reporters. “What the judge announced today was nationwide; the president’s executive order does not apply.”

Ferguson said the also nullifies the impact of the order on people seeking to travel to the U.S.

“That relief is significant, to put it mildly,” Ferguson said.

What these retards fail to mention is that the constitution doesn’t apply to non-citizens. The President can block foreigners from coming into the US for any reason whatsoever, including their religion, their race or their country of origin.

We’ll see how long this pathetic little rebellion lasts. The media are hailing it as a “devastating challenge,” but I have a feeling it’ll be overcome quite soon.