Wow, since when are dog-boiling chinks allowed to decide on national security issues?

How is this not treasonous interference with the national security of America?

The Supreme Court already ruled on this, Chin Chongman.

And you lost.

Are we really going to have to go through all this nonsense again?

Washington Post:

Grandparents and other extended relatives are exempt from President Trump’s travel ban, a federal judge in Hawaii declared late Thursday, again stopping the administration from implementing the president’s controversial executive order in the way that it wants.

Are their goats exempt, too, while we’re at it?

Goats are like family to Moslems.

U.S. District Judge Derrick K. Watson wrote that the government’s “narrowly defined list” of who might be exempt was not supported by either the Supreme Court decision partially unfreezing the ban or by the law.

Which law?

Certainly not the constitution, that’s for sure – as it only applies to US citizens, not aliens on foreign soil.

Do US laws apply to space aliens as well?

“Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents,” Watson wrote. “Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government’s definition excludes them. That simply cannot be.”

Watson wrote that refugees with an assurance from a resettlement agency could also be exempt from the ban.

This is the kicker right there.

Obviously, if rapefugees could be exempt from the ban simply for being in a relationship with some private Jew organization trying to flood America with brown people, then that’s a massive loophole.

In fact, it’s more than a loophole; it completely blows the whole travel ban apart. There would be nothing preventing every last ISIS jihadist from getting a slip from their Jew masters in order to infiltrate America.

This must be reversed.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement Friday that the Justice Department would “reluctantly return directly to the Supreme Court to again vindicate the rule of law and the executive branch’s duty to protect the nation.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is not amused by your impudence, chink.

“Once again, we are faced with a situation in which a single federal district court has undertaken by a nationwide injunction to micromanage decisions of the coequal executive branch related to our national security,” Sessions said. “By this decision, the district court has improperly substituted its policy preferences for the national security judgments of the executive branch in a time of grave threats, defying both the lawful prerogatives of the executive branch and the directive of the Supreme Court.”

As of Friday afternoon, the Justice Department had filed a “notice of appeal” — which lawyers view as a procedural step as they ultimately move the matter to the Supreme Court.

Appealing this isn’t enough.

There’s no end to this kind of ridiculous interference.

Those responsible must be punished, so as to stop this from happening non-stop. Otherwise, everything the Trump administration tries to do will be cockblocked by random scumbags in the federal court circuit.

Soon, Trump’s power will be better established, and he will be able to move more decisively against his enemies.

You better hope the next executive order doesn’t ban chink judges from travelling outside of a federal prison.

A rookie Hasidic cop fired by the NYPD for refusing to trim his beard was the victim of religious discrimination, a federal judge said Friday.

The decision appears to pave the way for Fishel Litzman’s reinstatement.

“I want people to know that you can follow your dreams and never have to compromise your religion,” Litzman, 39, told the Daily News outside his home in Monsey. “That’s what makes this county so great.”

Litzman was fired in June 2012, a month shy of graduating from the Police Academy. He said he got booted because he refused to adhere to department standards limiting beards to no more than 1 millimeter in length.

His lawyer, Nathan Lewin, filed suit on his behalf, arguing that the city came up with an “after-the-fact rationalization” by saying facial hair would prevent him wearing a gas mask with a proper fit. The city at the time said Litzman would put himself and others at risk if he needed to wear the mask in an emergency.

But Federal Judge Harold Baer Friday upheld Litzman’s constitutional claim, criticized police and told his attorney to submit within 10 days a “proposed order.”

“We’re going to ask that he be reinstated,” said Lewin, a legal heavyweight who has fought and won beard battles on behalf of observant Jews with the Army and Air Force. “We hope this is the beginning of the end of the (NYPD’s) refusal to grant full religious accommodations to applicants who may not, for religious reasons, trim their beards.”

The NYPD said it’s reviewing Baer’s decision. A spokeswoman for the Law Department said, “We respectfully disagree with the court and are considering our options.”
Baer, in his decision, agreed that the NYPD would suffer an “undue hardship” if every officer wasn’t capable of wearing a gas mask that seals tightly against the face, without facial hair interference. But he also noted that the NYPD could not provide documentation that the 1-millimeter restriction is an official rule. The NYPD failed to enforce the restriction against cops not granted an exemption, such as undercover officers, he added.

Litzman, a father of five, who has been working as a paramedic since getting canned, says his goal since that day has remained the same.

Read More