The UK is actually stuck in 2016.

They think Donald Trump is going to take away trannies, so they’re doing trannies harder than ever.

They did not see Deadpool 3. They don’t know that we’re not doing woke anymore.

Every country in Europe just copies America, while at the same time insulting Americans. Obviously this is true. No one could independently think up the mass trannification of society.

In London, they are still listening to Korn and white guys are walking around with dreadlocks.

ABC News:

Alex Consani has made history as the first transgender woman to be named the Fashion Awards’ Model of the Year.

Celebrated for her striking bleached eyebrows and hair, the 21-year-old rising star was honored on Monday at the 2024 Fashion Awards, which were held at London’s Royal Albert Hall.

The annual event is organized by the British Fashion Council as “a key fundraiser for the BFC Foundation,” according to a release.

The recognition follows Consani’s standout appearances with renowned fashion houses such as Chanel, Isabel Marant, Alexander McQueen, Versace, Tom Ford, Marc Jacobs, Mugler, Stella McCartney and more, as well as major brands including Victoria’s Secret.

Dressed in a ripped Union Flag dress by Turkish British designer Dilara Findikoglu, the California native called the honor “a big step in the right direction for the fashion industry,” according to CNN.

Turns out you can get the uncanny valley effect from humans too

“Now, more than ever, we need to have meaningful conversations about how to uplift and truly support one another in this industry, especially those who have been marginalized,” she said.

She also used the moment to honor Black transgender women who she said paved the way for her, including trailblazing models Connie Fleming and Aaron Rose Philip.

“They fought for the space that allowed me to flourish today,” she said.

Consani also credited her parents for their unwavering support of her modeling dreams.

Jeez.

Imagine being this guy’s father.

But… you gotta do what women say in a democracy, or you go to prison. So if your wife says the son is a girl, you just gotta sit there and take it.

His parents sent him to a “trans-only summer camp” when he was 12

Frances Coombe, 30

Yeah.

No one wants to look at this tranny shit.

I wish the New York Post would have taken a stand on this pronoun thing, if only because it’s really confusing. To be clear, this is a woman who took testosterone to “become a man.” Because women are retards.

New York Post:

A transgender model is suing his New York-based modeling agency for discrimination, claiming it killed his career after he transitioned and branded him “insufficiently masculine” to work in men’s fashion.

Frances Coombe, 30, who is a Canadian catwalk model, filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday, claiming Muse Model Management NYC and its president Conor Kennedy had violated his civil rights protecting gender identity.

Coombe is requesting more than $300,000 in lost income and is seeking damages for emotional distress over the downfall of his reputation and career, the lawsuit said.

“It is no surprise that models evolve their looks, and I had been moving towards more androgyny for quite some time,” he told the Daily Beast in a statement.

The high fashion model said several other models — both male and female — at Muse Model Management had also been moving toward androgynous looks, but did not receive the same pushback.

Coombe, who has walked for the likes of Marc Jacobs and Gucci, said he told his agency that he no longer wanted to model as a female and requested to do male work, but Muse allegedly “refused” and “constructively terminated” his contract, according to the suit.

Around October 2021, Coombe — who identified as non-binary at the time — alleges that Kennedy told him they would still pitch him for women’s jobs as there was no such thing as genderless work in the industry.

“In modeling life, you will be ‘she’ and ‘her’ until you arrive on set, non-binary models are not sought after in the casting process. When you show up for a job you can tell them your pronouns then,” Coombes recalled Kennedy telling him. “We’ll be sending you to women’s wear jobs and you have to separate your private life from your work life.”

…

Shortly after, Coombe saw a “rapid decline” in work opportunities and income. Muse Model Management made comments suggesting this was due to his changed gender identity, he alleged in the suit.

I don’t think anyone actually hates trannies so much that they would lose money. Most people just think they are sick and insane. If I could exploit trannies for money I’d probably do it. Who cares?

But there is just simply no money to be made. People do not like looking at these creatures after they do these things to their bodies. It’s disgusting, scary, and harrowing.

“The audience appeared not to notice he was an intruder”

“The art world” is the most decadent homosexual scene this side of child trannies.

Of course it’s impossible to tell the difference between a man dressed in random garbage and a real “runway model.”

News.com.au:

They say that modelling is not just beauty and a smile, it takes boldness and style and one intruder at New York Fashion Week proved this statement true.

During a show hosted by the social media agency Creators Inc, one man joined the models strutting up and down the catwalk.

Entering the runway in nothing but a shower cap, bright coloured swimming shorts, white runners with black socks and a see-through plastic poncho on top, the intruder blended in perfectly.

He was greeted by the audience like any other model, with cheers and applause but as he got towards the end of the runway, his cover was soon blown.

Is that lolisocks? 

In the video that was shared by UNILAD, a security officer can be seen chasing him down and grabbing a hold of him. The security then drags him away, leaving the audience stunned.

…

And while people who witnessed the event were left shocked, social media didn’t take long to find the incident humorous.

“That is not garbage but garbage,” one person commented.

…

The New York Fashion Week imposter isn’t the first time someone has imitated a piece of art or design.

Back in 2016, two Californian teenagers took the art world for a spin when at an art gallery, they put a pair of eye glasses on the floor. The result was visitors assuming it was one of the exhibits.

The reason behind this scheme was due to the simplicity of some the exhibits at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, which had included two stuffed animals on a blanket.

In an interview with The New York Times, the pair questioned whether the exhibits should be classified as art.

“Is this really what you call art?” 16-year-old Kevin Nguyen said.

TJ Khayatan, 17, added: “We looked at it and we were like, ‘This is pretty easy. We could make this ourselves.’”

This has been the nature of the art world since the 1960s. And even before the 1960s, you had stuff like Picasso, which mocked the basic notion of “art.”

It’s very sad.

Art is an important part of any culture, and the abolition of real art in our society is a marker of absolute decline.

Some people would say that we do not even live in a society at all.

Just the tip of the iceberg

Editor’s note: some of these articles produced by the other writers, are ridiculously long, and really go against the spirit of the site, which is intended to be quick and punchy. I have complained about this, and been told that there is necessary information in these posts. Nonetheless, I imagine that less than 25% of the readership is going to read through what is posted below, and I would really like this to stop happening. 

Alden Wicker, an expert on chemicals in fasion, The Guardian:

The first thing that happened when Mary, an Alaska Airlines attendant, received a new, high-performance, synthetic uniform in the spring of 2011 was a hacking cough. Then a rash bloomed on her chest. Next came migraines, brain fog, a racing heart, and blurry vision.

Mary (whose name I’ve withheld to protect her job) was one of hundreds of Alaska Airlines attendants reporting that year that the uniforms were causing blistering rashes, swollen eyelids crusted with pus, hives, and in the most serious case, breathing problems and allergic reactions so severe that one attendant, John, had to be taken off the plane and to the ER multiple times.

Tests commissioned by Alaska Airlines and the flight attendants’ union turned up tributyl phosphate, lead, arsenic, cobalt, antimony, restricted disperse dyes known to cause allergic reactions, toluene, hexavalent chromium, and dimethyl fumarate, an antifungal that had recently been banned in the European Union. But the uniform maker, Twin Hill, avoided culpability in court by saying none of these many mixed chemicals, on their own, were present at high enough levels to cause all of the different reactions. Alaska Airlines announced in 2013 it would procure new uniforms, without admitting the uniforms had caused health issues. A lawsuit from attendants against Twin Hill was thrown out in 2016 for lack of evidence.

But a 2018 Harvard study found that after the introduction of the uniforms, the number of attendants with multiple chemical sensitivity, sore throats, cough, shortness of breath, itchy skin, rashes and hives, itchy eyes, loss of voice, and blurred vision had all more or less doubled. “This study found a relationship between health complaints and the introduction of new uniforms,” the study’s authors concluded.

In 2021, John, who had been in perfect health before the introduction of the uniforms, died at age 66 after years of seeking and failing to find treatment for his symptoms. The official cause of his death was cardiopulmonary arrest, secondary asthma. Mary, who has continued with some difficulty to work for Alaska Airlines, last year was diagnosed with three autoimmune diseases: mixed connective tissue disease, lupus, and Sjögren’s. Mary and John’s surviving partner say the uniforms were the culprit.

This story of sick attendants has played out again and again, as American Airlines, Delta, and Southwest all introduced new uniforms, which were brightly colored polyester instead of the old standby, wool, and were layered with anti-wrinkle, stain-resistant, and flame-retardant textile technology.

Mary and John are far from alone. The impact of exposure to harmful chemicals on textile workers, many of whom work in developing countries, has been well documented and includes breathing problems, rashes, and even death, but I was less aware that so many in the US were reporting ill effects simply from wearing garments. Rather, as I discovered while researching my book To Dye For: How Toxic Fashion is Making us Sick – and How We Can Fight Back, they are part of a diverse and disparate cohort of people who believe they have suffered from the health effects of toxic fashion.

“Flight attendants are the canary in the coalmine because of the length and consistency of their exposure,” said Dr Irina Mordukhovich, one of the Harvard study’s authors. “That doesn’t mean that other people in the population are not still being affected in some way. Let’s say someone has clothing with the same components – they may not even notice; they just don’t wear it so much.”

Karly Hiser is a pediatric nurse practitioner in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Her oldest son was a toddler when his eczema worsened, she said. She switched her family to fragrance-​free soaps and non-toxic cleaning products, and smeared him with lotion, Vaseline, and prescription steroid cream after long baths. “Everything we tried did not help,” she said. Open wounds developed on his hands and behind his knees, and they got infected.

Like any parent on a budget, Hiser had been buying cheap clothing from mass-​market brands, including polyester athletic clothes, but he was refusing to put his clothes on. “He’s a really sweet, nice, low-​key kid. And every morning getting dressed was a nightmare, just screaming tantrums,” she said. The thing that finally made her kid’s eczema manageable, she said, was pulling out her grandmother’s sewing machine, buying non-toxic fabric from an online store, and sewing all his clothes herself.

Despite her job as a nurse practitioner, it took Hiser over a year to figure out what she now firmly believes: that the clothes were the problem. “You know, like the nutrition labeling for food, I would prefer if there was better labeling for clothing,” she said. “Not all chemicals are bad or harmful, but I would like to at least be aware of what’s in children’s clothing.”

Jaclyn is a former fashion production manager in New York City. She told me about her experience opening boxes of samples from Asia and South America every day and being hit in the face with the pungent smell of synthetic chemicals. After years of touching this freshly made clothing, she developed rashes on her hands and arms. When her dermatologist tested her for allergies, she found out she was allergic to several chemicals typically used in fashion production, including a blue disperse dye used to dye polyester. Unfortunately, there was nothing she could do to protect herself – all those allergens are perfectly legal to put on and in clothing. Even if she quit her job, she has to wear clothing to live. Her health spiraled after that, a result, she believes, of the stress of her job combined with touching and breathing in fashion chemicals day in and day out.

Chemicals in clothing are a complex, opaque and an under-researched area. “There’s not necessarily a lot of evidence that goes into deciding what is a safe limit of a chemical,” Mordukhovich said. “Even if each chemical is below thresholds that would be considered a direct safety issue, what we don’t know is if you have hundreds of chemicals interacting together, what effects does that have?”

For her PhD at Duke’s department of integrated toxicology and environmental health, Dr Kirsten Overdahl spent years distilling and cataloging disperse dyes in an effort to prove, in paper submitted for peer review, that they are skin sensitizers. Most are not even labeled or cataloged in the literature, much less tested for safety. “I see every day, just in our raw data that the instruments produce, that there are often thousands of chemicals in a sample that can’t be matched to a known chemical. That’s absolutely terrifying,” she said. “This doesn’t mean that every chemical is bad. Maybe it’s harmless. But if we can’t match a name to a chemical structure, it means that the data is not out there. So you can’t say it’s not safe, but you also can’t say it is safe.”

Recently, researchers and advocates have ramped up the practice of buying and testing regular garments and the results are illuminating. The Center for Environmental Health in California has found high levels of the hormone-disrupting chemical BPA in polyester-spandex socks and sports bras by dozens of large brands, including Nike, Athleta, Hanes, Champion, New Balance, and Fruit of the Loom, at up to 19 times California’s safety limit.

When the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation had 38 pieces of children’s clothing tested from the ultra-​fast-​fashion brands Zaful, AliExpress, and Shein, it found that one in five had elevated levels of toxic chemicals such as lead, PFAS, and phthalates. This year, the period panty brand Thinx settled a lawsuit stemming from a test by a Notre Dame professor showing high levels of fluorine, indicating the presence of PFAS, a highly toxic class of “forever chemicals” that provide water and stain repellency.

Some of the chemicals scientists have found in garments – such as tributyl phosphate, dimethyl fumarate, and disperse dyes – can be acutely toxic or hazardous, causing skin reactions or asthma. Others have been proven, outside of their use on clothing, to have links to cancer, reproductive toxicity, allergies, and skin sensitization.

A 2022 study by Professor Miriam Diamond at the University of Toronto and Professor Graham Peaslee at Notre Dame estimated, meanwhile, that on average, children wearing stain-​resistant school uniforms would be exposed to 1.03 parts per billion of PFAS per kilogram of their body weight per day through their skin. PFAS have been connected to several cancers, fetal abnormalities, reproductive disorders, obesity, and reduced immune system function. When it accumulates in the blood, PFAS are considered toxic at the parts-​per-​billion level. More research is needed on how readily PFAS shed from clothing can be absorbed into the skin and bloodstream, but the results are alarming enough to spur firefighters to revolt against their PFAS-laden turnout gear.

Some chemicals found in clothing, such as BPA, PFAS, and phthalates, have been found in time-bound experiments and longitudinal studies to mimic hormones and interfere with our endocrine system, causing a little-understood cascade of health effects ranging from extreme weight fluctuations and fatigue to infertility and chronic disease.

Once exposure stops, some chemicals, such as BPA, can be metabolized and peed out by the body, eventually breaking down and going away. Others, such as heavy metals, accumulate in the body and in the environment, lasting for decades or, in the case of PFAS, forever.

When tested in contexts other than fashion, many of these substances, such as pesticides and solvents, have been found to damage the body over years of chronic, yet infinitesimally small exposure. Their presence in fashion worries some experts. As Diamond at the University of Toronto told me: “We know that chemicals are continually lost from any material over time. It’s a physical reality that the chemicals migrate to your skin from your clothing, with and without sweat.”

“We see the trends, but we cannot nail the trends to this and that chemical,” Dr Åke Bergman, a Swedish environmental toxicologist who specializes in endocrine disruptors, told me in 2021 about the rise of reproductive disorders and infertility. He was part of a taskforce convened in 2020 to advise Sweden on taxing toxic chemicals used in fashion. “There is an enormous use of a large number of chemicals. We strongly feel that there is a link between the exposures to these chemicals and the effects that are observed.”

For all the evidence, however – the toxic test results that are piling up, the researchers and advocates in the North America and Europe ringing the alarm, the reports of skin burns from shoes, tights, and bras on the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s website – this is an extremely difficult subject to make conclusive statements about, and an unpopular area of scientific research. There are no studies linking the experiences of fashion and airline employees with the experiences of the general population, nor studies examining the effects of chronic, everyday exposure through wearing textiles with these hazardous contaminants and finishes next to our skin. Meanwhile, fashion’s very complexity lends itself to obfuscation and confusion.

In the US, there are no federal standards for what can be put on clothing and sold to adults. The EU has banned more than 30 substances for use in fashion, and it will reject some shipments at the border, but its testing program is small and easily skirted.

…

One reason is that neither consumers or professionals know which, or even how many, chemical substances are used to manufacture, process, weave, dye, finish, and assemble clothing and accessories.

“It’s becoming more difficult to avoid these chemicals,” Dr Elizabeth Seymour, at the Environmental Health Center in Dallas, says of additives like solvents and heavy metals. “There are multiple chemicals that are put in everything. And your clothing is included in that.” But while beauty, cleaning products, and packaged foods come with an ingredient list, fashion does not, even though testing reveals it has some of the most complicated and multilayered chemical profiles of any product, running up to 50 chemicals or more.

Having researched this for two years, I am more careful now with my own clothing. I avoid cheap, knock-off, or ultra-fast fashion brands. I shop with companies I trust, who care about their reputation and have a chemical management program or labels such as bluesign, Oeko-Tex, or GOTS. I choose natural fibers whenever possible, and avoid fancy promises like stain repellency, anti-odor finishes, easy-care and anti-wrinkle fabrics. I wash any new clothing before I wear it, with unscented, non-toxic laundry detergent. And I trust my nose – if something stinks, I send it back.

I have been avoiding non-natural fabrics and scented detergent for decades. This seems really obvious.

They are trying to sexually arouse people with little boys.

If you say that out loud, they will say “oh you must be sick for thinking that! You must be the one sexually aroused!” That’s how they silence you – “you’re against gays because you’re secretly gay!” and “you only talk about blacks being violent lunatics because you’re jealous of their massive horse cocks!” and “you only attack feminism because you’re an incel who can’t get pussy!”

Here’s the reality: a little boy that hasn’t matured has features that are feminine. They are using makeup on the little boys that is used to trigger male sexual arousal. The lipstick, the eyeliner, the blush – these are things that are scientifically shown to trigger male instincts.

Pederasty – man-on-boy love – has been a thing since ancient times in various cultures, and homosexuals in the 1980s and 1990s were fighting to legalize man-on-boy love. Allan Ginsberg, a Jew poet who was one of the most influential gay activists of the 20th century, was an active pederast and advocated for legalizing sodomy of prepubescent boys. This guy is still taught in universities as a revolutionary hero.

Trannyism is primarily supported by homosexuals who are still trying to normalize sodomy of pre-teen boys, and they are promoting it in the media to try to get normal people – who are inundated with pornography – on-board with the agenda.

Reduxx:

A 10-year-old child is making headlines as the world’s youngest trans model to walk the runway at New York Fashion Week after representing the Trans* Clothing Company brand.

Noella McMaher was a model at New York Fashion Week in February, but the child’s story has begun to receive additional media attention after it was announced that the 10-year-old had been signed on for modeling gigs until November.

According to Noella’s parents, the child began expressing gender dysphoria around age 2.

Referring to the boy using feminine pronouns, Noella’s mother stated: “She would refuse to wear boy clothes and have tantrums because she was so young. She knew what she wanted, but didn’t have the words to say it … I should have known earlier, as she hated anything masculine, so I brought her to a gender clinic.”

At age 4, Noella was “socially transitioned,” referring to a process in which a child is “affirmed” in their chosen gender identity by presenting as that gender while in public. It was around this time Noella’s mother said she brought the child to therapy at the gender development clinic at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. During the appointments, Noella told a gender counsellor he was a “girl.” By Age 6, Noella’s legal documentation had already been changed.

But information on the child’s family is often left out of the glowing profiles.

Dee McMaher, Noella’s biological mother, is a social justice advocate who identifies as non-binary, appears to be on hormone replacement therapy, and recently had a cosmetic mastectomy. Both she and her current partner are females who identify as trans masculine.

According to the Point Foundation website, McMaher, neé Kalick, has been an “advocate and educator” for transgender children for 10 years — roughly since around the time Noella was born.

These are the “parents.” And yes, they’re both women.

In 2019, McMaher and Noella were featured in People’s World during a legal episode in which McMaher was fighting for full custody of her child from her biological father, Timothy McCord.

According to McMaher, McCord had been opposed to 4-year-old Noel’s transgender identity. McCord and McMaher had been separated at the time, but the father had visitation rights and the two parents shared child-care duties during the week while she was at work. At the time, McMaher was employed at the Rainbow Family Support Center as a transgender advocate, and McCord’s visitation often included making dinner and putting Noella to bed.

In July of 2016, McCord caused a fracture in Noella’s arm, something McMaher stated happened while he was forcing Noella into “boy pajamas.” McCord is reported to have then given Noella medication and sent the child to sleep. The next morning, after Noella expressed pain, McMaher reported McCord to child protective services and he was arrested on charges of aggravated child abuse.

Your kid would’ve been better off if you had broken his neck instead of his arm

McMaher also fought to have McCord charged with a hate crime, but the court determined there was not enough evidence to do so. In 2018, McCord pleaded to a lesser charge and was handed probation rather than jail time. He is currently employed as an analytical chemist in Chicago, having previously worked as a medical examiner and toxicologist for Cook County, Illinois.

In 2019, McMaher married Ray, a biological female who also identifies as transgender and works in “LGBTQ health justice.”

That year, Noella and McMaher were profiled in Chicago Parent, wherein it was stated McMaher has planned for Noella to have “gender surgeries” at age 16, but would start the child on puberty blockers and hormone therapy before then.

McMaher and her partner appear to have another young infant they are raising as non-binary, referring to the child as a “theybie” who is often photographed in a jumper which reads “genderless is more.”

Speaking to Reduxx on the case, Sinead Watson expressed incredulity at the disturbing details.

“I cannot believe this child was affirmed at such a young age. I cannot believe this child – this baby – was deemed wrong as young as 2.” Watson says, “And legal changes as 6? This whole case is abhorrent.”

Watson is a vocal member of an active and growing online community of detransitioners – people who began, but ended and sought to reverse a gender transition. Watson had taken testosterone for 3 years after deciding she identified as male, but later realized her feelings came from a struggle with misogyny and trauma. Watson has been open about her experience being immediately “affirmed” by clinicians, with all of them failing to investigate her history of mental wellness concerns.

“That this child’s parents both happen to be ‘trans’ or ‘queer’ is no surprise to me. They are forcing their own ideological ideas onto their innocent baby.” Watson says the phenomenon is not new to her, and that she’d seen stories of parents transitioning gender non-conforming children as early as 2015.

“As with the social contagion among vulnerable children, we’re seeing more and more parents with Münchausen syndrome by proxy. It’s not the kids who are trans – it’s the parents who want them to be trans.”

On the family’s plans to have Noella undergo “gender surgeries” at 16, Watson calls it “child abuse” in no uncertain terms.

“So many children will be harmed by this in the future. So many. I can say nothing else other than I am absoulutly disgusted by what these people are doing to this poor child. Unforgivable.”

Childhood transition has become a growing concern in recent years as many have witnessed an explosion in both gender clinic locations and the prevalence of “trans kids.” According to Gender Mapper, North America has seen the amount of pediatric gender identity clinics grow from a mere handful to “over 200” in just 10 years.

These mentally ill women and this poor little boy are just pawns in this agenda to remove the last transgressions.

You saw them do this with that “Cuties” Netflix film. They took little girls, 10 and 11, and painted them up like whores, then had them dancing around like whores, to try to make men sexually fixate on them. Everyone knew what they were doing, and people complained about it, but no one put it into the correct language: there are sexual triggers that are biological, and you get make up little boys and girls to activate these sexual triggers.

Some heterosexual men are sexually attracted to cartoons, and a realistic painting of a sexy woman will be sexually attractive to any heterosexual man. So obviously, things that are not “actual living fertile female” can be made to cause sexual arousal.

In a culture that is inundated with pornography, where people are seeking more and more novel things to masturbate to, you have people who are interested in little girls and boys, and they are using these sexualized children to try to normalize that across society.

Yes, this is a woman too

And somehow, the jockstrap ones aren’t even the ugliest clothes in the show

Breitbart:

New York Fashion Week has debuted an item that salutes the imperative form must follow function in the age of coronavirus: say hello to the jockstrap mask.

A model wore the distinctive piece of apparel Monday as he sashayed down the runway at the week-long event that finished Wednesday.

The novel creation featuring a breathe-through jockstrap mask came from the Dion Lee Fall/Winter 2022 show.

Lest anyone think there was only one color available, a second turn was taken with a model wearing a white jockstrap with appropriately match clothing.

Women were not left out in the pursuit to match clothing with a desire to shield the wearer from the perils of coronavirus.

This is not the first time fashion leaders have tried to add a personal piece of clothing to their face in the interests of warding off infection.

At the start of the pandemic back in 2020 the DIY coronavirus mask made its first debut out of a gym bag.

TV personality Emerson Collins posted a TikTok demonstrating his no-sew mask.

“I made a Jockstrap Mask Tutorial because I’m ridiculous,” the actor said in a tweet sharing the video.

In the clip, Collins demonstrates a simple, three-step method for securing the protective gear to cover the nose and mouth. He then models a variety of looks using the method, showcasing his varied collection.

You’re not ridiculous, sir.

Yes you are.

But you are a minor ridiculousness.

I made a Jockstrap Mask Tutorial, because I’m ridiculous. pic.twitter.com/JiYhV3K8uh

— Emerson Collins (@ActuallyEmerson) April 3, 2020

The only threat is that this will increase crime even worse.

Blackface is a thing of the past.

These days, “oversized ears and overgrown red lips” is where it’s at.

Daily Mail:

An African American runway model refused to wear a costume which depicted her as a monkey with oversized ears and overgrown red lips during a show in New York City.

Amy Lefevre, 25, says she refused to don the ‘racist’ accessories during a February 7 runway show staged by the Fashion Institute of Technology at Manhattan’s Pier59 Studios.

‘I stood there almost ready to break down telling the staff that I felt incredibly uncomfortable with having to wear these pieces and that they were clearly racist,’ Lefevre told the New York Post.

All blacks know that they’re closer to chimpanzees than they are to white people, so they all get really defensive about anything that highlights their chimpanzee features.

This is Amy Lafevre:

You can see she already has overgrown lips. If she weren’t hiding her ears, it would be easy to see that those are also oversized. Chimplike long finger bones also standing out in that picture.

‘I was told that it was fine to feel uncomfortable for only 45 seconds.’

Lefevre, who has been modeling on runways for four years, said it was the worst experience of her young career.

‘I was literally shaking,’ she told the Post.

‘I could not control my emotions. My whole body was shaking.

‘I have never felt like that in my life.’

Lefevre added: ‘People of color are struggling too much in 2020 for the promoters not to have vetted and cleared accessories for the shows.’

White people realizing that blacks are animals and sending all of them back to Africa or locking all of them up in some zoo is probably blacks’ worst nightmare.

The oversized lips and ears were designed by Junkai Huang, who recently graduated from FIT after arriving from his native China to study here.

According to the Post, the concept behind Huang’s design was to highlight ‘ugly features of the body.’

It is likely that Huang was unaware of the racial connotations that his work might provoke in some observers.

Innocent Chinese people don’t really understand why everyone in the West pretends that blacks are human and that blacks aren’t hideous.

It’s something obvious that everyone can see, yet no one is pointing it out.

The answer, of course, is that most white people are under some kind of spell that makes them see something nice every time they point their eyes to a black specimen.

Instead of seeing this:

Most whites in the West see this:

It’s an interesting kind of magic.

If obese monsters were real people and not repulsive abominations, obese males would get all of the ladies and obese females would get all of the men.

Anyone trying to promote overweight people or make the obese more easily visible than they already are is committing a crime against the psyches of healthy people.

This is visual terrorism and it must be stopped.

Breitbart:

Actress and left-wing activist Lena Dunham made her runway debut at London Fashion Week last week alongside traditional fashion models.

Lena Dunham, a vocal critic of President Donald Trump, walked in a show for the brand 16Arlington of which she has worn designs by in the recent past.

“It’s an adrenaline rush out there,” Dunham told Vogue of walking in the 16Arlington show. “I have to say, I think I was very coddled today—all of the girls were running and doing their quick changes, but people were there at every juncture telling me where to go, so I feel lucky about that.”

“It’s hard for me to imagine that I’m going to get a ton of job offers off the back of it, but it was a delight,” Dunham said.

The Girls star and former Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign celebrity surrogate previously wore a dress by 16Arlington to the premiere of Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood.

“And what I love about [16Arlington] is that they make something that fits your body beautifully, but also has a sense of humor. When I went to the Once Upon a Time premiere, I was like, ‘I look like a hot Muppet!‘” Dunham said.

Ignoring the fact that the clothing itself is vomit-inducing, the face of Lena Dunham is extremely vomit-inducing.

Everything about Lena Dunham is vomit-inducing.

Due to her alleged reptilian nature, she is unable to be perceived as sexually attractive by actual humans. There appears to be some kind of interspecies barrier that no one seems able to cross no matter how hard the overlords try.

Finding people beautiful and sexually attractive is a consequence of our bodies identifying signs of genetic fitness in them and urging us to reproduce with them.

These signs of reproductive fitness can even be immortalized in stone.

Stone that is pleasant to look at.

Promoting plus-sized models and fat acceptance is promoting infertility and degeneration.

This is a matter of life and death.

Mocking, shunning, and criticizing obesity is defending fertility, beauty, and life. Refusing to allow ugliness to invade public spaces is defending our future.

We need good optics. Not just as a movement, but also as a people and as a country.

Allowing pigeons to roam our land without wearing tiny hats is bad optics.

If we are to be taken seriously, we can’t allow our cities to be plagued with animals that have no sense of style or regard for beauty.

AP:

A pigeon wearing a tiny sombrero in Reno, Nevada, was discovered following sightings of its cowboy hat-wearing cousins in Las Vegas, a city manager said.

Reno City Manager Sabra Newby tweeted about the bird Wednesday, saying it’s quirky and fun but still inhumane, KOLO-TV reported.

It is the first known sighting of hat-wearing birds in the region, Washoe County Regional Animal Services officials said.

The sighting comes after a pigeon in Las Vegas with a miniature cowboy hat glued to its head died earlier this week, animal officials said.

…

“Reno cares about our animals,” Newby said. “They need protection and don’t need to become a punchline.”

It’s okay to care about animals, but beauty, style, and optics should come first.

There is literally no reason why all pigeons in white countries shouldn’t be wearing a wide variety of tiny hats.

Bad optic lovers may argue that wearing tiny hats can make pigeons’ lives shorter, but what matters isn’t the length of the pigeons’ lives but the impact it has on the population.

Tiny hats give pigeons’ lives meaning.

Little hats on the little heads of birds bring joy to the people who cross paths with them.

Bringing joy to people is a dignifying act.

Anyone who opposes the presence of tiny hats on the heads of pigeons is opposing joy itself and denying pigeons the chance to contribute back to the society they benefit so much from.

I don’t care why or how this happened, I’m just glad that it did.

Daily Mail:

A group of cowboy hat-wearing pigeons have been spotted in Las Vegas leading to concerns that someone may be gluing the accessories onto the birds.

Footage of the stetson wearing pigeons has gone viral after it was shared by local Bobby Lee with the caption ‘just another day in the neighborhood’.

The birds don’t seem to be phased by the headgear as they busily peck the ground in the empty parking lot.

However the hats, each slightly tilted, do not move as the pigeons peck around, suggesting they are glued on.

…

However, Mariah Rea, who owns pigeon rescue centre Lofty Hopes, wrote: ‘This is sad. Someone did this. However these are staying on is cruelty.

‘If it’s glue that’s horrible. If it’s tied on it will be tangle around their necks

‘I’m trying to get a hold of the guy who posted this so we can attempt to trap them and get the hats off. ‘

It’s not horrible. It’s beautiful and stylish.

It doesn’t matter if they were forced to wear tiny hats by evil men gluing them to their heads, because the hats look good on them all the same.

Similar to how dresses look good on women whether they are forced to wear them at gunpoint or not. You get what I’m saying?

It should be mandated by law that every pigeon must wear a hat in order to be allowed to do its “flying rat” pest routine thing. It is only fair that we get something in return for allowing them to be such a plague.

The same goes for women.

If we’re going to allow them to run wild and destroy civilization, covering everything in goo during the process, we should at least set up some unbreakable, basic ground rules.

The first is that they must do so while wearing cute dresses glued to their bodies.

The second one is that they must never, under any circumstance, attempt to take the glued dresses off.

The third one is that they must never cut their hair short.

Short-haired women are a form of terrorism.

We can add more rules later, but that’s a good start to fix the visual horrors that are so very common to witness the moment you step outside your home.

Tomboy “women” are another form of terrorism.