Stefan Smit

When someone says that blacks are violent and dangerous, blacks often engage in violence and threats to prove that they’re not violent and dangerous.

Likewise, when some white farmer accuses blacks of wanting to take his land and murder him, blacks build shacks in his land to prove that they don’t want to take his land and murder him to prove that they really don’t want to murder him.

This is normal black behavior.

Daily Mail:

South African wine merchant who spoke out against attacks on white farmers was found dead after being shot on Sunday night while dining with family and friends.

Stefan Smit, 62, had been openly critical of the threat of land grabs on his property – a large estate in Stellenbosch, Western Cape – South Africa’s most famous wine region.

It was a murder seemingly fuelled by a land dispute created when a squat straddling Smit’s Louisenhof Estate was set up, expanding into a vast settlement.

The farmer had previously complained about how citizens from a nearby township had begun erecting shacks at the back of his farm, culminating in him getting an injunction to prevent people from encroaching on his space.

Smit was killed when four men entered his vineyard through an unlocked back door and shot him dead. His wife and a family friend managed to survive the attack.

Pieter Haasbroek, a friend of Mr. Smit, told The New York Times: ‘They were busy eating dinner with friends when four masked men came into the house. They shot Smit dead. What we feared came true.’

The dispute over land has been ongoing and increasingly fractious, but police said it was too early to tell if Smit’s death was connected to that or a random murder.

Wait wait wait hold on.

“Random murder”?

Blacks in South Africa get together in groups of four and enter random houses at dinner to shoot random people for fun?

And they don’t shoot all the people having dinner, just one?

Who just so happens to be this man who spoke out about blacks taking white farmers’ lands?

Could be. It’s not hard to imagine blacks really do murder for fun (that’s what “random murder” means: murdering for fun) after observing what they do in Africa.

Did you know they even rape their own mothers?

Blacks love to murder and rape for fun.

The same dispute saw the murder of Annette Kennealy, 51, a farmer activist from Limpopo province who was beaten to death with a hammer and iron rod in late May.

Just another random killing totally unrelated to white farmers as a group and to the land grabs and farm attacks and stuff.

It’s just blacks being blacks, having a little bit of fun, killing a few people.

Ms Kennealy’s and Mr Smit’s murders comes as the government, led by Cyril Ramaphosa, pushes ahead with plans to alter South Africa’s constitution to allow land to be seized from farmers without having to compensate them.

…

Ramaphosa has said that his much-focused-on land reform is necessary to compensate for the ‘historical imbalance’ caused by apartheid and colonialism.

Here’s the thing: to say that colonialism and apartheid caused an imbalance of some kind, and to imply that the imbalance somehow caused blacks to be worse off than they’d have been without colonialism and apartheid, you’d need to have THE MISSING PIECE.

You know what THE MISSING PIECE is?

I’m talking about THE SMOKING GUN here.

You know what THE SMOKING GUN is?

I’ll tell you what it is.

Hold on.

Get ready.

Here it comes:

“WAKANDA”

Or any successful black country.

Or any non-shithole black country.

Or any non-chaotic black country.

Or any non-miserable black country.

Or any example of blacks being prosperous.

Or any example of blacks being able to run a country on their own.

There is no example of blacks being better off without white influence anywhere.

How can they even claim that there was an “imbalance” of some kind during apartheid and colonialism if they were worse off before colonialism than they were during and after it?

These shameless monkeys think that whites owe them something, and that somehow they lost stuff while interacting with whites.

These are blacks without whites:

As you can see, they don’t even have underwear.

These are blacks under the influence of whites:

Claiming that whites hurt blacks is insane.

Slavery didn’t hurt blacks.

Colonialism didn’t hurt blacks.

Apartheid didn’t hurt blacks.

On the contrary, interacting with whites has benefited blacks enormously. They’ve not only gained access to all of our inventions and the knowledge of our people for free, but they also regularly receive free stuff from us: vaccines, medical attention, money, technology, all kinds of gadgets and products and much more.

The groups of blacks that interacted the most with whites are the groups of blacks that are better off.

The more they interact with us, the better they are.

Blacks descended from the slaves brought to America are the most privileged blacks in the history of the world. There are no blacks better off than “African-Americans.”

In contrast, whites didn’t gain anything positive from interacting with blacks.

They ruin everything. Our schools, our cities, our neighborhoods, our economy, our pockets — everything.

But we’re supposed to feel guilty because someone allegedly forced them to work a couple of times in the past?

It’s insane.

Blacks should be paying reparations to us.

They should be doing something to repay everything that we’ve given them.

Tool Wessels.

More vibrant news from post-apartheid South Africa.

It truly is a rainbow nation free from hate, just like the Jews said it would be.

IOL:

The body of a farmer was found in a river after a brutally attack on his Kapteinsdrift farm in Bonnievale on Monday.

According to reports, Mr and Mrs Tool Wessels were attacked by four men wearing balaclavas.

The wife Liezel, who was stabbed in the chest and had boiling water poured over her back, managed to escape to a neighbouring farm.

The body of her husband was later found a few hundred meters from the home in a nearby river.

Police spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Andrè Traut said the circumstances surrounding the murder and attempted murder are being investigated.

Traut said four armed suspects attacked the couple, both 55, in their residence and held them hostage.

“The female victim who sustained a stab wound managed to escape and alerted police. The body of her husband was later discovered approximately 200m from the house,” Traut said.

He said the suspects fled with two firearms and are yet to be arrested.

Jason Witbooi, left, and Mbongosi Mgoqi.

How is it possible for two prisoners to escape a moving police vehicle and flee into the sunset?

Do these nigger cops even know how to lock doors and cuff hands?

South Africa Today:

The two escapees, Mbongosi Mgoqi (24) and Jason Witbooi (22) were successfully apprehended in the Storms River Area at 12:00 on Saturday 6 April 2019, with the assistance of an alert motorist.

Mgoqi and Witbooi managed to escape from the back of a moving SAPS vehicle at 11:20 on Tuesday, 2 April 2019, whilst being transported back to prison. The escape occurred on the R62 and N2 on-ramp, near the Kareedouw and Humansdorp turn-off.

Witbooi was arrested for the murder of Norman Ludwig, 69, who resided on a farm in the Joubertina area in October 2018.

Mgoqi was sentenced to five years imprisonment on 1 April 2019 on a charge of culpable homicide that occurred in August 2007, also in the Louterwater (Joubertina district).

A task team from the South African Police Service was immediately set up in search of the escapees. It is believed that the two escapees were hiding out in the Kareedouw district and they decided to leave the area. The two, who was hitchhiking this morning, obtained a lift from an alert community member who recognised the two immediately and notified the police in Storms River.

Police officers from the Storms River SAPS set up a roadblock on the N2 and pulled the vehicle with the two escapees off the road and re-arrested them on the spot.

Mbongosi Mgoqi and Jason Witbooi are due to appear in the Humansdorp Magistrate’s Court on Monday, 8 April 2019 on a charge of escape from lawful custody.

“Everything you see here but my nigger ass has been made by the white people I’ll kill.”

Niggers have been genetically damaged by what happened centuries ago. They want to heal themselves by killing white people and taking their stuff. Healing gibs.

Daily Mail:

White South Africans could be forced to give up their own homes from next year as the nation’s government steamrolls through plans for land expropriation over claims ‘Africa’s original sin‘ must be reversed.

The National Assembly agreed to the establishment of a committee that will draft an amendment to section 25 of the Constitution – a law which will allow the government to take homes from the people – and refuse to pay them compensation.

As many in the nation see the move as retribution for the ‘original sin’ when decades ago black people were driven off their land, it is believed white farmers will be driven from their homes immediately.

Does anyone really believe white people will be “driven from their homes” and not get horribly murdered? Read this if you haven’t yet, especially the end.

Governing party The African National Congress (ANC) wants to amend the law so the government can take back land and distribute it.

However, critics say it is likely it will be handed off to their friends rather than dished out to those in need.

There’s no reason to think corruption will take place.

Last week the nations politicians fast tracked the set up of a committee which will write the legal change and present it next year.

The motion was adopted with 183 MPs voting yes, 77 voting no and no abstentions in fiery scenes as South Africans battle over land reform.

Economic Freedom Fighters politician Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi said those arguing against legalising land grabs are ‘beneficiaries of racism’.

‘Your time is up, white people,’ She added.

Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi.

White people?

Wasn’t this about farms and land?

The EFF will later put forward an amendment stating all land in private hands must be appropriated.

Democratic Alliance chief whip John Steenhuisen said the amendment is being pushed through without proper procedure.

‘What it (the passing of the motion) also says, very clearly, to the people of South Africa is that regardless of their submissions, this bill is a fait accompli (already decided),’ Steenhuisen said.

‘This is madness. The message it sends to the people of South Africa is ‘we don’t care what you say’.’

Democratic Alliance chief whip John Steenhuisen.

MP Sibusiso Mncwabe supported the adoption of the motion: ‘Let’s continue giving this Christmas gift (expropriation without compensation) to our people.’

Sibusiso Mncwabe.

A city outside Johannesburg is preparing what the mayor calls a ‘test case’ over plans to take hundreds of acres of land from private owners, without paying for it in order to build low-cost housing.

Low-cost housing designed by nigger engineers.

Last month, Ekurhuleni’s city council voted in favour of forging ahead with ‘expropriation without compensation’ – a legal tool that the ruling African National Congress says is necessary to provide land for disadvantaged black citizens.

Ramaphosa handed over the title deeds of 4,586 hectares of land to Chief Inkosi Mandla Mkwanazi of the KwaMkwanazi community in Empangeni, near Durban.

Who knows what are whites even doing right now in South Africa…

They can’t say they didn’t see all of this coming. Niggers have been talking about it for some time now.

Have white South Africans prepared? Do they even intend to fight back?

This isn’t just about land. Niggers want to kill all whites.

One could understand if they didn’t want to leave their land, and in that case, you’d expect them to at the very least be stockpiling weapons and ammo. There’s no sign of that.

Are they really idling while these daemons prepare to sacrifice them all?

I know that South Africa seems bad these days, but you need to remember that apartheid was worse.

“Apartheid” literally means “hating people because of the color of their skin.”

What could be more wicked than that?

White Murder:

A mother and her children were attacked by three attackers in their Drakenstein farm home. The attackers gained access to the home through an open window.

They demanded cash, jewelry, electronics and firearms. After the home was ransacked the attackers tied up the women and her children before they left the premises.

The mother later managed to free herself and her children before calling the Drakenstein Farm Watch control centre.

There’s an article on Al Jazeera called “Unpacking South Africa’s fraught and complex land debate,” which makes some bold claims about the South Africa situation.

As a sad rule of thumb, you can assume any article including the word “unpacking” will actually be a convoluted mess designed to confuse you.

Al Jazeera:

It is estimated that white South Africans, who make up around nine percent of the population, own around 73 percent of commercial agricultural land.

9% of the population.

White people are a minority in South Africa. I thought the narrative was that minorities should get privileges and straight-up rule because they’re oppressed by the majority.

At least that’s what is being pushed in the West. So… why are those same people not up in arms to defend this particular minority?

On the other hand, the implicit message in the above quoted paragraph is that somehow it’s bad for a white minority to control most of the agricultural land. Why would that be the case? White people invented most technology, techniques, and overall tech use in modern agriculture anyways.

Niggers could get hurt operating dae widepeoples magicchines. Niggers could die.

Change the minority and suddenly you’re a neon-nazi for pointing out who owns most of the media in the world and what they all have in common.

Who do you think *owns* the press? Hello.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 27, 2018

Claims that white farmers are being disproportionately targeted and killed, or that a “white genocide” is taking place in South Africa have been repeatedly refuted.

Has anyone ever claimed that whites where disproportionately targeted in South Africa?

If whites are murdered by a group of non-whites, does it matter in which proportion compared to that non-white group in-killings they get killed?

“Nigger Group A niggers killed 100 Nigger Group A niggers and only 10 whites, see? No problem here.”

It’s retarded.

We all know niggers can’t stop themselves from killing other niggers. Nobody ever claimed that South African niggers didn’t kill each other and only targeted whites.

“But muh proportions.”

…Fine.

You want to talk proportions? We’ll talk proportions.

Nigger proportions. Just general nigger stuff.

From The Color of Crime:

In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

How could that be? Momma Merkle told us huwhitey was killing dae blaeck!

In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a non­black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

Breitbart:

Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968.

But they call themselves brodahs.

Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years.

They’re just blowing some of that compressed steam caused by huwhitey, right?

Chicago’s death toll is almost equal to that of both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, combined.

…among themselves.

It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone.

But Black Lives Matter tho

Investor’s Business Daily:

About 90% of interracial violent crime in our nation is committed by blacks against whites. The black-on-white murder rate in the U.S. exceeds the white-on-black rate by about 2.5-to-1. The black-on-white assault and battery rate exceeds the corresponding white-on-black rate in this country by at least 10-to-1.

Can you blame them? Whites brought them to America and invited them to be a part of the best country in the world, you know, the one people die trying to get to, saving them from the perils of Africa. Such an evil act.

I would rather not report what is known about U.S. interracial rape statistics because it could be taken as incendiary, but the previous numbers in terms of black/white proclivity are dwarfed. (See Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, “Victims and Offenders.”)

OK, here’s a hint: Because the number of white-on-black rapes is so low nationally in any given year, the ratio ranges from 100-to-1 to infinity. Liberal, politically correct feminists need to reflect on that one.

This must be fake news right? There’s no way niggersblack men are 100 times more likely to rape a white woman than white men are to rape a sheboonblack woman!

The government is in on this lie!

It’s a well known fact that white men have big harems of black sexual slaves.

They don’t even need to chain them or lock the doors because black women get so obese that they can’t pass through door frames.

The baseline conclusion is straightforward, even if surprising to readers who are victims themselves — victims of racial and racist propaganda. The hysterical public mantra of epidemic white-on-black violence is thus exposed as fraud.

Yeah, I’m not convinced.

Let’s keep looking.

Telegraph:

They show that among those proceeded against for street crimes, 54 per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and for gun crimes, 67 per cent. Street crimes include muggings, assault with intent to rob and snatching property.

Just over 12 per cent of London’s 7.5 million population is black, including those of mixed black and white parentage, while 69 per cent is white, according to the Office for National Statistics.

The above Telegraph article is from 2010.

Can you imagine the current numbers? Because you’ll have to, since pointing out the race of criminals is considered racist in the UK now.

Correctional Service Canada:

This study found that, in comparison to their proportion in the Canadian population, Caucasian and Asian offenders are under-represented, while Black offenders are disproportionately represented.

Disproportionately.

Crime and Enforcement Activity in New York City:

The Shooting arrest population is similarly distributed. Black arrestees (74.6%)and Hispanic arrestees (22.9%) account for the majority of Shooting arrest population. Asian/Pacific Islander arrestees (1.3%) and White (1.1%) account for the remaining portion of the Shooting arrest population.

This whole Australia/South Africa issue is a bit of a mess.

First, Australia’s Minister for Home Affairs, Peter Dutton, suggested issuing fast-track visas to white South African farmers to help them escape from their nigger-infested shithole (though he didn’t phrase it that way).

Next, the South African government, offended by Dutton’s implication that blacks were murdering whites throughout the country, demanded a retraction.

Then, Australia’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Julie Bishop, apparently rejected Dutton’s suggestion and stated that there will be no special considerations for the farmers.

Now, Dutton – who claims that Bishop didn’t reject his suggestion – is looking into “specific cases” of white South African farmers needing visas.

Breitbart:

Australia’s Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton says it’s “unquestionable” some white South African farmers are being persecuted and his department is looking into specific cases.

Mr. Dutton also told Sky News Australia that no one in the government has retracted his offer to help white South African farmers who are eligible to be resettled under Australia’s refugee program, despite the South African government claiming Foreign Minister Julie Bishop had done so.

Peter Dutton.

On the contrary, he maintains that his department is “looking into” specific cases and Australia will do what it can for people in “desperate” situations.

Mr. Dutton’s comments follow weeks of debate between the Australian and South African governments over the fate of threatened farmers in South Africa.

As Breitbart News reported, Australia is ready to consider issuing special visas to mainly white, Afrikaans-speaking South African farmers due to the “horrific circumstances” of land seizures, violence and murder they face.

The announcement was made last month, with Mr. Dutton outlining that Australia has refugee, humanitarian and other visa programs which have the “potential to help some of these people”. He said he had asked his department to look at the options “because from what I have seen they do do need help from a civilised country like ours”.

South Africa immediately rejected Mr. Dutton’s concerns, demanded a retraction and called in Australia’s High Commissioner to explain.

Mr. Dutton has now disputed the South African Government’s interpretation, saying neither Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull nor Ms. Bishop has “rebutted” his comments.

Julie Bishop.

Politics being politics, it’s difficult to know what’s going on behind the scenes here.

While it’s easy to imagine that the South African government wants to prevent this program from going ahead (since most black politicians know that their country is screwed without white farmers, particularly when a massive drought is looming), it’s just as easy to imagine a dumb woman – who, for some reason, is Minister of Foreign Affairs – interfering for similar reasons.

Peter Dutton seems sincere. He has a history of making anti-immigration and anti-faggot comments, some of them bretty good…

… so, assuming he has his way, I believe that some white farmers will be rescued.

But we’ll have to wait and see.

One thing is certain, though: just creating a dialogue about this subject on the world stage is enormously beneficial. Not just because it draws more attention to the plight of white people in post-apartheid South Africa, but because it encourages other whites around the globe to think: “Wow… you mean not all refugees are 35-year-old brown children from Syria? Maybe we should be importing these kinds of refugees into our countries instead…”

Since South Africa’s cross-over from Apartheid to democracy in the early-90s, an alarming phenomenon has been sweeping the country’s farmlands. With over 3000 white farmers murdered up until this point, some see it as a systematic racial genocide, others an exaggeration, and many write it off as a symptom of crime. Finally a documentary has been made to look at this troubling issue.

Rian van der Walt, an independent film-maker, explores South Africa’s bloody past and how it has affected modern day society. In a country where the murder rate is 34.6/100 000 people, compared to the USA rate of 6/100 000 people, violent crime is an everyday occurrence.

In this feature length film, Rian will embark on a journey to meet with the victims of violent crime and those left behind. He meets with experts who have studied the psychology of murder and violence to share their insights as to why the degree of violence and torture is so different to other violent crimes and to understand the troubling state of South African society.