This is great because it attacks climate change, feminism, faggots, and Western social media operations all at the same time.

Burn it all down, My Czar.

Reuters:

Laws that would ban “propaganda” which discourages Russians from having children won overwhelming approval on Thursday in the first stage of their passage through parliament, part of a Kremlin drive to boost the country’s flagging birth rate.

The move to outlaw content that is deemed to promote a child-free lifestyle won unanimous backing from members of the lower house, the Duma, in the first of three required readings.

“It is important to protect people, primarily the younger generation, from having the ideology of childlessness imposed on them on the internet, in the media, in movies, and in advertising,” said Duma speaker Vyacheslav Volodin, a powerful ally of President Vladimir Putin.

“We continue to form a unified legal framework for the protection of children, families, and traditional values.”

Putin, who portrays Russia as a bastion of moral values locked in an existential struggle with a decadent West, has encouraged women to have at least three children to secure the demographic future of the country.

What Putin is doing is so good, it cannot be overstated.

He’s using the war as a way to push through all of these social agendas that the core Russian society has always wanted. Part of it is pragmatic on his part, because these values are what men go to war to fight for. But another part of it is simply repairing the broken society that the collapse of communism created.

Putin is a great man of history, shaping an entire civilization to his will.

This is what a hero looks like.

☝️ “Russia banned the propaganda of homosexuality among minors. We have a right to protect our children and we will do that” – President Putin. pic.twitter.com/Z2DA35r4VC

— 🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy (@RussiaIsntEnemy) October 8, 2024

The “woke” thing is going out of fashion, so as you would expect, ultra-liberals are doubling down on it.

The national Democrat Party is backing off of woke, apparently on orders from Disney, but the ultra-liberals will keep trying to enforce it until everyone normal leaves their shitty lunatic asylum states.

The Post Millennial:

The Vermont Department of Health (VDH) published public advice to families on Wednesday, encouraging parents to refer to their children as “kids” rather than “son” or “daughter,” alleging that these phrases are not “inclusive” enough.

The recommendation was included in a social media post regarding “inclusive language for families.” In addition, that post advocated for the use of the term “family members” rather than “household members” to encompass incarcerated individuals, step-siblings, and others who might not live in the house.

Vermont’s Health Department is run by a handsome Jew named Mark Levine. Both his deputies are white women.

Also from Health Vermont’s website. If you don’t understand what this has to do with health, you’re probably a Nazi.

“The language we use matters!” the health agency wrote. “When talking about family, it’s important to use terms that cover the many versions of what family can look like.”

The list of recommendations and the department’s explanations are as follows: “Use ‘child’ or ‘kid’ instead of ‘daughter’ or ‘son.’ This is gender-neutral and can describe a child who may not be someone’s legal son or daughter. Say ‘family members’ rather than ‘household members.’ Not all families live in the same home – think divorced, or incarcerated parents, stepsiblings, etc. Say ‘family’ rather than ‘extended family.’ Often grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins are important parts of a core family unit.”

The post contains a link to subscribe to the department’s Health Equity newsletter.

…

Also included on its website are links to articles such as “What it’s like to be a migrant worker in Vermont” and “Why is Vermont so overwhelmingly white?”

Why is Vermont overwhelmingly white?

What answer did they come up with?

Should I go look it up…?

Okay.

Here’s the article:

It’s the story of a Jew woman from New York wondering why Vermont is so white and trying to figure out how to make it less white. Because of course that’s what it is. What else would it be?

Anyway, the conclusion is… it’s because racist Vermontites only wanted German/Scandinavian farmers.

Also, people bought second homes there and blacks are too poor to buy second homes (because of slavery).

Finally, um… the tourist literature is too white? Yes, it even has white steeples on their white churches. In the tourist brochures. So black people are afraid to go there.

This is fascinating, informative stuff. Truly.

A few weeks ago I decided to write to Pope Francis @Pontifex about surrogacy. Here is the letter I sent to him.

Today, he took a very strong stance AGAINST surrogacy in a speech he gave this morning ↩️
« In this regard, I deem deplorable the practice of so-called surrogate… pic.twitter.com/wlSCUjxJii

— Olivia Maurel (@maurel_olivia) January 8, 2024

This is something that maybe you could agree with – if women didn’t act the way they do.

As it is now, men have a right to pay women to have their children, otherwise men will be left childless. Women are refusing to produce children all over the world (except the blacks).

Remember: this is the same Pope who called for a worldwide legalization of gay anal rimming, fisting, pounding, and more.

AP:

Pope Francis called Monday for a universal ban on the “despicable” practice of surrogate motherhood, as he included the “commercialization” of pregnancy in an annual speech listing threats to global peace and human dignity.

In a foreign policy address to ambassadors accredited to the Holy See, Francis lamented that 2024 had dawned at a time in history in which peace is “increasingly threatened, weakened and in some part lost.”

Citing Russia’s war in Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war, migration, climate crises and the “immoral” production of nuclear and conventional weapons, Francis delivered a lengthy laundry list of the ills afflicting humanity and the increasing violation of international humanitarian law that allows them.

What is the difference between the Pope and Greta Thunberg?

You’d feel safe leaving your kids with Greta Thunberg.

But Francis also listed smaller-scale issues that he said were threats to peace and human dignity, including surrogacy. Francis said the life of the unborn child must be protected and not “suppressed or turned into an object of trafficking.”

“I consider despicable the practice of so-called surrogate motherhood, which represents a grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child, based on the exploitation of situations of the mother’s material needs,” he said.

Saying a child is a gift and “never the basis of a commercial contract,” he called for a global ban on surrogacy “to prohibit this practice universally.”

Francis has previously voiced the Catholic Church’s opposition to what he has called “uterus for rent,” and some European countries prohibit it, including Spain and Italy. At the same time, however, the Vatican’s doctrine office has made clear that homosexual parents who resort to surrogacy can have their children baptized.

It’s a complicated issue.

The gays shouldn’t be allowed to do surrogacy.

But what about all the men who want kids, and the women who refuse to have kids?

If the Pope is against surrogacy, he should start telling women to get married.

But he won’t, because the Pope only promotes evil.

Well. This news surprises no one.

The surprising thing is that someone did the study.

RT:

Teenage children of liberal parents are more likely to experience mental health problems, according to a study published Thursday by the Institute of Family Studies and Gallup. Liberal parents have poorer quality relationships with their offspring – the most important influence on a child’s mental development, according to the survey.

Explaining that political ideology is one of the strongest predictors of parenting style, study author Jonathan Rothwell noted that “conservative and very conservative parents are the most likely to adopt the parenting practices associated with adolescent mental health.”

“Liberal parents score the lowest, even worse than very liberal parents, largely because they are the least likely to successfully discipline their children,” the survey found. In contrast, it discovered that conservative parents are more likely to mete out discipline effectively while displaying affection and responding to the child’s needs.

The difference in outcomes was not small, according to the study. Only 55% of the offspring of liberal parents reported good or excellent mental health, compared to 77% of adolescents with conservative or very conservative parents.

A lot of it has to do with authority.

Kids need authority. It’s the only way they feel safe.

Obviously, masculinity in the father makes kids feel safe too, and liberals are anti-masculinity.

Regulation, enforcement, and warm responsiveness were the parenting practices most associated with favorable outcomes. According to the study, parents who agreed their child “must complete the priorities I set for them before they are allowed to play or relax” and “follows a regular routine” on school days saw significantly better results. Daily displays of affection and quickly responding to a child’s needs had similarly weighted effects on mental health.

Conversely, parents who said they found it “difficult to discipline their child” saw a significant negative correlation, as did parents who said the child often gets their way in parent-child conflicts.

Yeah.

While avoiding “adverse experiences” such as parental alcohol or drug abuse, death, or abandonment also had a strong predictive effect, it was dwarfed by how parents and teens reported the quality of the overall relationship. Other substantial influencing factors included how often the teen felt safe and protected and whether they lived with someone who was “frequently angry.”

That would be the mother who would be “frequently angry.” Virtually all of the time.

I guess liberal men are angry a lot too.

Men do have anger, but part of being an adult is learning how to bottle it up and let it rot you out from the inside instead of displaying it publicly. There is nothing more pathetic and feminine than a public display of anger.

For me personally, what really helped was just becoming constantly grumpy. I’m never angry. I’m just always in a morbid state. This is good for the kids, I think. They feel I’m an authority, and they feel protected.

There are also soft spots, of course. Brought to light by alcohol, which is the best way to keep your mood stable.

I was reading some comments on a secret gamer forum I attend, and someone wrote this:

Lavrov seems like a serious person. The adult in the room, so to speak.

I’m no expert on Russian leaders, but he sure looks and acts more serious than any of the bat shit crazy lunatics running the west these days. Blinken has this deer in the headlights look that seems to be permanently affixed to his Jew puss now, it never changes. And he’s the guy who got those 50+ intel experts to sign that paper saying that laptop had all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. The fact that this illegitimate idiot Biden is still in the Whitehouse and still being called the president is a Jew disinformation campaign.

You see, Jews are Bolsheviks, they always were the Bolsheviks. Now all they can do is project against everyone else, but if you know what you’re looking at, you can always see the Bolshevism of the Jews when they get anywhere near the levers of power, and this administration is THE most Jewed up god damn thing I’ve ever seen in the US.

Blinken, Garland, Nuland, hell we just sent Penny Pritzker to The Ukraine recently.

Walensky who just left the CDC to no doubt go push her propaganda from the offices of Pfizer or some other Pharma powerhouse. All of these people, and more that I can’t sit here and name all day, have two things in common. 1: They’re Jews, and, 2: They never tell the truth about anything. Listening to a word they say and believing it is dangerous. They’re also the ones who always want to censor everyone else.

Throughout all of recorded history, I can’t think of a single time where those who pushed censorship were ever on the right side of ANYTHING!

These mother fuckers just slithered in here and set up shop with their Jew bank, and over the years they bought up everything, they just monopolized it all.

Amerika is not a serious country, it hasn’t been for a long long time. These people are a joke!

I thought it was a great comment.

So then someone replies:

HEAR HERE! I’m going to stand up at the Thanksgiving dinner table and read that post, excellent!

Then, the guy who wrote the first post replies:

I’m glad you get it. Thank You.

I believe much of what I say is stuff that needs to be said, and I’m not afraid to say it. That said, perhaps holiday gatherings with family aren’t always the place to say them. My own family knows what I think, I’d say the younger boys and younger men are on the same page, but there are some (like my sister) who don’t like it, and holiday gatherings aren’t really the place to turn into a battle royale.

You know the people you’re going to be having dinner with, so it’s your call of course. For your parents sake (if they’re still alive and will be there), please don’t make a scene, they just want to have dinner with their children. There’s (usually) better times to talk about this stuff, and most of the people who don’t get it are never going to anyway. Use proper judgement, and if the ground is fertile then go ahead and plant the seeds. Otherwise, please just have a nice day and deal with people in a more one-on-one basis at another time.

I know my parents didn’t mind that I thought for myself and came to my own conclusions. There was never a time I couldn’t say whatever I wanted to say, but saying it at a holiday dinner table with people who were not receptive to it (sisters, in-law’s, invited guests, etc.) would just make my parents day a drag, so I usually bit my tongue or moved the conversation to after dinner away from unreceptive ears. I assume you know who you’re going to be with, I just don’t want my words driving people away from the dinner table and/or starting a family brawl. To the people reading this forum, this stuff may not seem provocative, but out there in the world it’s very provocative. You have to bring people up to speed, you can’t just dump the whole load on them in one fell swoop. We’re fishing, not hunting.

And with that, I hope you have a great Thanksgiving.

I couldn’t have said it better myself. I have said it, but he said it better. I say it every year at the holiday period: you’re going to be with your family, you’re maybe going to be drinking – do not start talking about the Jews.

Even if someone brings it up, as they might given the current situation, just say something like “yeah they should do a ceasefire.” Don’t go into some crazy rant.

There was actually a part above this in the very first Illness Revelations article – you may remember. It’s towards the end there.

But yeah, I guess we’re about to wrap this article up – it’s so great I didn’t have to write very much.

I promise you: you will not regret taking this advice.

Most likely, your family is a bunch of losers who do not care about the truth, or else they would be harassing you about the Jews. It’s not like this isn’t really, really obvious. I mean, imagine the type of life-failure you have to be to be uncomfortable talking about the fact that Jews are everywhere running everything in our society. Imagine how lowly of a person you have to be to be intimidated by the stupidest possible propaganda, and imagine how low your moral character has to be to see this suffering caused by these Jews and be unwilling to stand up and call it out.

This is the majority of people.

They are complete failures at life and they have very low moral character. You just sort of have to accept that. It doesn’t mean they’re “bad people,” it just means they are weak, pathetic worms.

These people are just taking up space, and their stupid problems do not matter.

But what are you going to do?

It is what it is.

Why would anyone not want a large family?

Personal life satisfaction increases, as an absolute matter, with the size of the family.

Washington Examiner:

A growing number of people in America prefer families of three or more children, hitting the highest desire for large families since 1971.

According to a Gallup survey released Monday, the number of people who prefer smaller and larger family sizes are statistically tied, bouncing back from a decadeslong trend of believing one or two children was ideal.

“Overall, this recent survey shows that Americans might finally be climbing out of the anti-family bomb shelter caused by the myths of the 1960’s of a population explosion disaster,” Terry Schilling, the president of the American Principles Project, told the Washington Examiner. “Favoring more children is a sign that Americans are returning to basic principles and values that life was made for — bringing forth the next generation through the family.”

Forty-five percent now favor larger families, with 29% finding three children as ideal, 12% who prefer four, and 2% each who prefer five, six, or more.

That is compared to 47% who believe two or fewer children is ideal, with 44% preferring two children and 3% preferring one. Two percent believe the ideal family should not include children.

Gallup pointed to several social trends from past decades that may have contributed to the decline in having children, including the preference for larger families “plummeting” from 70% in 1967 to 52% in 1972 “fueled at least in part by concerns about a global population explosion, resulting from the 1968 bestselling book entitled The Population Bomb.”

The organization started tracking this data in 1936, when 64% preferred three children, reaching a peak in 1945 at 77%. However, by 1973, the strong preference for families of one or two children became the norm, evidenced by the 50% drop in children-per-family from the peak of the baby boom to 1.8 children in 1980.

What stands out to Schilling, however, is that only 8% do not wish to have children, leaving over 90% with the desire for children at any amount.

“The 8% of America that’s anti-family has way too much representation in our culture — especially in entertainment, politics, news media, academia, and even corporations,” Schilling said.

Gallup notes that people under the age of 30 are at least twice as likely to say they do not want children, but the “vast majority” continue to prefer having children. Twenty-one percent of that age group already has children, and 63% hope to have children in the future.

Moreover, 69% of those who already have children want more, as well as 15% of 18- to 40-year-olds who want to be parents someday. Six percent of childless people aged 41 and older also wished they had children.

While ideal family size is not significantly different from men to women, other demographic traits do trend in certain directions.

Young people aged 18-29 are more likely than any other age group to prefer larger family sizes, and black and Hispanic people are also more likely to prefer larger families. In addition, Republicans, conservative independents, and lower-income residents tend to prefer families with more children.

By contrast, Democrats, non-religious, and wealthy residents are more likely to prefer only one or two children.

Despite stated preferences, birth rates have been on the decline, and adults are starting families much later in life, which is highly correlated to smaller family sizes.

In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported the average age of a woman who had her first child was 27.3 years, a record high.

Part of the answer for fertility declines, author Melanie Notkin writes in a piece for the Institute for Family Studies, is that much like the effect of The Population Bomb in the 1960s and 1970s, “we have a similar trend with the rise of anti-natalism where its nihilistic supporters believe the world is too sad a place to bring children into, along with climate change ‘doomerism.’ More practically, the current economy makes family forming more challenging for many young Americans.”

This negative cultural stuff from the Jews could be winding down. There are many signs of that.

But it will not leave without a fight.

Stupid peasants just buy whatever bullshit the Jews sell them

Utopia, Brother.

HH.

Breitbart:

A study from the Marriage Foundation suggested that nearly half of children in Britain are no longer living with both of their biological parents by the time they reach 14 years of age.

Drawing on a dataset of 4,476 first-born children in the UK conducted by the Millennium Cohort Study and weighing the sample to represent the national population, the Marriage Foundation revealed on Monday that 46 per cent of children in the country are not living with both their natural parents by the age of 14.

The Marriage Foundation found that the majority of such cases (70 per cent) were a result of breakups from non-married couples, while 30 per cent were from families of married couples. For children whose biological parents were still together by the age of 14, 84 per cent had married parents, compared to just 16 per cent who were unmarried.

The data also showed that 60 per cent of parents who had never married were separated at the time of their child’s 14th birthday, compared to 21 per cent who married before the child was born and 32 per cent who married following the birth.

Harry Benson, Research Director of the Marriage Foundation, said that even when “considering a wide range of socio-demographic controls – such as ethnicity, age, time lived together, education and relationship happiness”, the numbers still indicated a greater probability of never-married parents to split up at 46 per cent, compared to 26 per cent for those who married before the birth and 27 per cent after.

The results back up similar findings from the Children’s Commissioner last year which found the 44 per cent of those born in 2000 spent some time living outside of a traditional nuclear family by the time they reached 17.

…

The founder of the think tank, Sir Paul Coleridge said: “Every experienced parent knows that if adolescents are to successfully navigate the scary teenage years they need a secure and a stable family environment.

“If you want to experience the rich rewards of fully enjoying your children… marrying the other parent is a crucial first step.”

The Marriage Foundation report called on the government to do more to support marriage. This may be a big ask, however, given that the supposedly Conservative government has in its decade-plus in power demonstrated open hostility towards the traditional family.

For example, stay-at-home mothers were enraged in 2020 when then-Home Secretary Priti Patel demanded that the government do more to incentivise the 8.5 million “economically inactive” people — nearly two million of whom were women who decided to stay home to raise their children — into employment.

The government’s tax structure already punishes traditional family structures, with the state only taxing individuals rather than recognising family units, meaning that families reliant upon a single income of £50,000 will take home less money than two working parents on salaries of £25,000, thereby incentivising both partners to work rather than stay at home with children.

If this wasn’t on purpose, it would be considered a crisis.

They incentivize divorce for women, making it hugely profitable.

Then they disincentivize healthy marriages by making them brutally expensive.

Speech by the founder of this group

How can you imagine that they are not doing this on purpose because they want to destroy the family because they know that if the family does not exist, humans do not have bonds with each other, and therefore there is nothing between the government and the individual.

The government has absolute direct rule over the isolated individual.

The Jews wrote about this as a way to stop the next Hitler.

Go read Theo Adorno’s “The Authoritarian Personality.”

Actually, don’t read it – it is basically impossible to read. I have really high reading comprehension, because I have been reading think tank white papers for ten years and reading obscure philosophy for ten years before that, and I struggle with Adorno.

But go read the summary, read the Wiki maybe (although I’m sure that’s white washed).

I want to get this guy Coltraine to write summaries of books for the site. He is a super-reader. He’s the most extreme reader I know. He’s read probably 1000x more books than me. I’ve never seen someone read like this.

But his writing is long-winded, and doesn’t do great with structure (which is confusing, given that he reads so much, but most people probably need outlines and don’t do them). I think I might try to do some co-writing with him, because this is just really a waste to have this guy reading all of this stuff and not publishing.

Honestly, I’ve wanted to make his book reviews one of the key features of the site for a long time. He reads all this obscure Jew stuff. He’s probably read Adorno in full, which I have not done. Honestly, if I’m just being frank with you, I’m not super well-read, especially compared to a Coltraine type figure.

E. Michael Jones is also super well-read, and his footnotes in his books are a goldmine. He’s probably also written significantly about Adorno.

We really need to get on this Adorno guy. People talk about the Frankfurt School, but they usually just go into the anal stuff and then make vague reference to “cultural Marxism” (without ever saying these people are all Jews). Adorno is much more relevant.

Snake Baker contributed to this article.

Related: Children? Want Someday.

It’s men’s fault!

All the good ones disappeared!

For the first time in all of human history, there is no man good enough for an average woman!

National Post:

From “egg showers” to viral TikTok videos of 20-somethings sharing their egg-freezing journeys, oocyte cryopreservation is having its big moment. The number of females in Canada seeking to preserve their eggs for non-medical purposes is on the uptick, with 1,200 egg-freezing cycles reported in 2021, compared to a mere 94 in 2013.

The numbers doubled between 2020 and 2021 alone, an unexpected pandemic surge. With social and dating lives upended, “a lot of people feel they lost three years of their reproductive life,” said Dr. Sony Sierra, president of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society.

In Canada, the average age for first-time mothers is now 31.4. “Society is sort of telling us, dictating, especially to women, what they should do — get your education, travel, get a job, buy your house, meet a partner, and follow that path. But of course, our reproductive anatomy hasn’t caught up,” said Carolynn Dubé, executive director of the patient group, Fertility Matters Canada.

Egg freezing can alleviate pressure, Dubé adds, “that sort of societal pressure, even the pressure a woman feels for herself on her future family-building plans. This is something they can do in their early to mid-20s, even their early 30s.”

Apple and Facebook were among the first to pick up the costs of egg freezing for female staff, and other major tech companies and big banks followed suit, though corporate Canada has been less enthusiastic than corporate America to embrace employer-paid egg preservation. Still, Canadian fertility clinics are hosting virtual webinars for the curious on “all things egg freezing,” heartening fertility specialists and patient advocates who say it’s important to make young women, or young people with ovaries, aware of age-related changes to the quantity and quality of their eggs.

While it’s often pitched as a fertility insurance policy or back-up plan for when women are ready to conceive, egg freezing is expensive. There’s no guarantee of a pregnancy or live birth in the end and, rather than bolstering a woman’s reproductive freedom, a recent study found egg-freezing workplace perks can seem more pressuring than progressive, an implicit nudge that women should make work, and not babies, their central focus.

Others argue the primary reason women are electing to place their eggs in deep freeze is a lack of worthy and stable reproductive partners.

Yeah, okay.

Freeze your eggs and try having a baby at 38 when you’ve realized that you’re going to have to settle for a man who is not really good enough but is the only thing available for you.

Hope the baby doesn’t have autism and Down syndrome.

Salute.

So, let’s see here.

Japan already had a low birthrate, but, I mean…

Japanese population deaths/birth for 2022 data drop!

SHOCKING numbers!!

Check out the sharp rise post vaccination(2021/2022) below.

Death Acceleration!

And Birth rate drops below 800K, 8 years EARLIER than expected, lowest rate in 122 YEARS! (Since record keeping began) https://t.co/c8PVJ1kHUy pic.twitter.com/BLVK7vhsB5

— aussie17 (@_aussie17) February 28, 2023

This is far and beyond the expected rate of decline.

Daily Stormer was the first to argue, well before there was talk of a vaccine, that the lockdowns would cause family collapse and the breakdown of all kinds of human relationships.

But let’s be real. This is too extreme.

It’s the vaccine.

Japan Today:

The number of babies born in Japan in 2022 fell to a new record low for the seventh consecutive year, dropping below 800,000 for the first time since records began in 1899, government data showed Tuesday.

The total number of births was down 5.1 percent to 799,728, according to preliminary data released by the health ministry. The drop comes much earlier than a 2017 government forecast that said births would fall below 800,000 in 2033.

Lifestyle changes resulting from the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic and a growing trend of people marrying later in life or not marrying at all are thought to have exacerbated the declining birthrate.

“Many complex factors are involved, including financial instability among young people and less social encounters,” an official of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare said.

“The drop in births in 2022 is likely to have been impacted by the decline of marriages in 2020 due to the arrival of the pandemic, given how, in many cases, the first child is born two years after getting married,” said Takumi Fujinami, a senior researcher at the Japan Research Institute.

“Women in particular are less willing to have children,” Fujinami said. “Along with the economic and employment environment, the issue of the gender gap, which puts a heavy burden on women in areas like child-rearing, should be improved.”

The latest data showed that excluding children born to foreign parents, the approximate number of births is estimated to be around 770,000.

The same thing is happening in South Korea.

These Asians went all in on the vax.

We are looking at a situation where we are just not going to have any kids.

At least the Japs are trying to do something

Kimberly Guilfoyle used to date Gavin Newsom.

She is a kind of parasite that attaches to men’s necks.

It would be very strange if anyone liked her, save the man under her spell, who is the primary victim.

New York Post:

Rumors have been swirling that the Trump family “doesn’t like” Don Jr.’s fiancée Kimberly Guilfoyle — but Eric Trump says he “thinks the world” of her.

“The vibe is that the family doesn’t like Kim,” says a source. “She is trying too hard to be in the family.”

But Eric told us when we reached out to him for comment, “I completely disagree with the narrative and happen to think the world of Kimberly.”

An insider tells us Don Jr. and Guilfoyle held a party at their $9.7 million Palm Beach, Fla., mansion this week for Toys for Tots that was DJ’d by Detroit rapper Kid Rock.

We’re told tongues were wagging over who was — and wasn’t — at the family at the bash, which was estimated to have 300 guests.

While Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner did not attend, a source tells us: “They were invited to go, it was [Jewish sabbath] Shabbos. They have a good relationship. It’s just the rumor mill.”

Former President Donald Trump, we hear, came to the fundraiser for half-an-hour, but left before a “holiday boat parade.” Eric Trump and his wife, Lara, were also in attendance.

Eric had only kind words for Guilfoyle, telling us, “I am best friends with Don and had an absolute blast at the party.”

Rumors that Guilfoyle might be on the outs with some of the Trump family started last month.

During Tiffany Trump’s wedding last month to billionaire Michael Boulos, Ivanka made headlines by cropping Guilfoyle out of a family photo shared on social media.

This woman is 53 years old, and she is a low-down rough rider and a dirty dog.

Old, used-up women who are on the dating market are always going to be bloodsuckers. However, even if they weren’t, it makes zero sense why someone in a position of power and influence would choose such a person to have a romance with. Why would you not get a very young girl?

I can’t ever think about this couple without thinking about when the groypers protested a Turning Point USA event they were at, and Guilfoyle went full “angry mommy” mode and started telling our lads that their mothers are mad at them and they must not be able to have sex or they wouldn’t believe in things.

It was like a parody.

The two ended up disappearing out the back like Batman.

.@DonaldJTrumpJr got booed off the stage and even his cokequeen .@kimguilfoyle couldn’t save him. pic.twitter.com/U7ZMtRGHe7

— FRO🔆🌊🏳️‍🌈 (@FROsunLiberal) September 27, 2022

He later went on with the Jew Mark Levin and claimed that the Groypers are leftists.

.@NickJFuentes did .@DonaldJTrumpJr just call the Groypers Leftists?….#groyper #GroyperWars https://t.co/QrluyLnzTk pic.twitter.com/cex9mRocEH

— DNA | Damascus News (@DamasNewsAgency) November 17, 2019

The whole situation sort of demonstrated that being the son of a capable man doesn’t make you capable, and there may actually be a negative correlation.

Donald Trump would not bitch out when booed, and he definitely would not be riding dirty with a sneaky dog 53 years of age.

I won’t ever blame a man for a divorce, because men simply do not have rights in divorce courts and I genuinely do not believe that any man wants a divorce.

But I will say: Don Jr. has had a very serious fall from grace.

If your wife leaves you and you start dating a hot teenage girl, the wife is going to get very jealous and make overtures towards fixing things. If you start dating a rough-riding 53-year-old town bicycle, she’s going to say “ew, gross – I really was too good for him.”

At the very least, we must say, a divorce man going full “used up hag” is not a strategy for getting the kids back.