false rape allegations – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Sat, 27 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png false rape allegations – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Trump Ordered to Pay $83.3 Million for Contradicting E. Jean Carroll, Saying He Didn’t Rape Her https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/01/27/trump-ordered-to-pay-83-3-million-for-contradicting-e-jean-carroll-saying-he-didnt-rape-her/ Sat, 27 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000

BREAKING: Jury orders Trump to pay $83.3 million in damages for defaming E. Jean Carroll pic.twitter.com/W0mSs6WHIq

— MSNBC (@MSNBC) January 26, 2024

This is the most absurd thing yet, aside from trannies.

She accused him of a rape in a crowded shopping mall, decades ago, which he denied. Then she won her civil suit – not over the rape, but over the denial.

After Trump lost the suit, he again said it was bullshit, and then she sued him for not agreeing with the outcome of the civil suit.

If he says this one is bullshit, he can presumably get successfully sued a third time.

Reuters:

Donald Trump was handed a stinging defeat on Friday by a Manhattan jury that ordered him to pay $83.3 million to the writer E. Jean Carroll, who said he destroyed her reputation as a trustworthy journalist by denying he raped her.

Jurors needed less than three hours to reach a verdict in Manhattan federal court following a five-day trial. The sum that the former U.S. president was ordered to pay far exceeded the minimum $10 million that Carroll had sought.

Carroll’s case has become an issue in Trump’s campaign to retake the White House in the November U.S. election. Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden, who beat him in 2020.

Has it really “become an issue”?

It seems to me people are more likely to support him because this old bag is harassing him.

Trump attended most of the trial, but was not in the courtroom to hear the verdict. He said in a social media post that he will appeal.

Carroll, 80, did not answer reporters’ questions as she left the courthouse, with her arms around two of her lawyers. Her representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The former Elle magazine advice columnist sued Trump in November 2019 over his denials five months earlier that he had raped her in the mid-1990s in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan.

Carroll testified that Trump’s denials “shattered” her reputation as a respected journalist who told the truth.

The seven-man, two-woman jury, whose members were kept anonymous, awarded Carroll $18.3 million in compensatory damages, including $11 million for harm to her reputation. The jurors also awarded $65 million in punitive damages, which Carroll said were needed to stop Trump from continuing to defame her.

What is she going to do with that $65 million?

Run an ad campaign about the truth of the rape?

Trump, 77, maintained that he had never heard of Carroll, and that she made up her story to boost sales of her memoir.

His lawyers said Carroll was hungry for fame and enjoyed the attention from supporters for speaking out against her nemesis.

In May 2023, another jury ordered Trump to pay Carroll $5 million over a similar October 2022 denial, finding that he had defamed and sexually abused Carroll.

Trump is appealing that decision, and set aside $5.55 million with the Manhattan court during that process. Both appeals could take years.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who oversaw both trials, said the earlier verdict was binding for the second trial, including that Trump sexually abused Carroll by forcing his fingers into her vagina.

That meant the only issue left for jurors was how much Trump should pay.

That filthy Jew lawyer judge will definitely do this a third time.

It will just keep going like this until one or the other of the two dies.

]]> Andrew Tate’s App Removed Because He’s a Bad Influence https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/23/apple-removes-andrew-tates-app-over-allegedly-being-mean-to-women-bad-role-model/ Sat, 23 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

The following social media companies could face jail time or a fine of 10% revenue if they don’t remove all promotion and affiliate links for The Real World:@TeamYouTube @TikTokSupport @instagram @rumblevideo @Reddit

Please share and warn these companies! pic.twitter.com/RBe9uXV9p8

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

To be fair, Andrew Tate is a bad role model. He shouldn’t be censored, because no one should be censored. And obviously I agree with a lot of what he says (though the parts I agree with are all very basic).

He’s a better role model than anyone else who’s not already totally banned, I guess. At least he says women are retarded and men should have money. But he says that in the worst way, and his political stuff is very basic.

Dude is just super basic.

He’s telling guys to get rich and drive Bugattis so they can get laid. His entire schtick is that the purpose of being a man is to impress women.

And how does he advise you to get rich? By running camwhore and crypto scams.

He was a professional athlete who started a brutal camwhore business, then got into crypto scammery. I don’t really think this is a path that most people watching him could follow, even if they thought it was a good idea. And the purpose of the whole thing is to… get access to that disgusting, stinky, gooey hole that women have between their fatty ham legs.

It’s stupid. The whole thing is stupid. Just as a social phenomenon, Andrew Tate is very ridiculous, and it shows just how broken the society is that this is what young men turn to.

Look at this:


(does flaunting money and luxury sound like things that would make God happy?)

It’s materialism.

I’m the number one guy saying “men should have money.” I think it should basically be the center of your life. If we looked at it like life is a video game, getting money would be “core gameplay.” But materialism is feminine. And this guy is in no position to talk about money, since he made it in the scummiest ways imaginable.

Now, check this:

“Mommy thinks I’m a good little boy.” Literally.

Breh.

You want the money for power. You don’t want it for bobbles, and you definitely don’t want it for women’s approval. Those are the two worst reasons to want money (though the latter is significantly worse than the former) coming from the guy who got money in the worst ways imaginable.

He would be cooler if he was a bank robber and a literal rapist. Even if you didn’t endorse bank robbery and literal rape, you’d at least have to be like “yeah, dude’s hardcore and he’s ride or die and very classy.”

He could be like “nigga, u mad?” and I’d be like “yeah, them niggas mad.”

But no. He made money from pornography and then did lovey-dovey with gutter sluts. And honestly, if someone does that, then okay. But he did it, then went out and told other people to do it, like “yeah, this is really a good way to live your life, guys.”

I have to also say: censorship is a big part of this. People saw what happened to me, and this no doubt killed in the cradle a bunch of men who would have otherwise devoted their lives to being “life coach” type role models for young men. So because of censorship and the government/media life-ruining people who say anything politically incorrect, instead of healthy role models demonstrating masculinity, you get a guy who doesn’t really have anything to lose.

The Guardian:

Apple has withdrawn an app created by Andrew Tate after accusations that it encouraged misogyny and could be an illegal pyramid scheme.

Tate created the app, Real World Portal, after the closure of his “Hustler’s University”, which was an online academy for his fans, promising to assist them in making thousands of pounds while helping Tate’s videos on social media, which have been described as misogynistic, to go viral.

McCue Jury & Partners, the firm representing four British women who have accused Tate of sexual and physical assault, claimed that the app deliberately targets young men and encourages misogyny, including members of the app sharing techniques on how to control and exploit women. The firm has also claimed that there is evidence to suggest that the app is an illegal pyramid scheme, with members being charged $49.99 a month to join.

That sounds like price-gouging, not a pyramid scheme. You’re allowed to charge for an app.

But yeah, I guess if he’s paying people out through the app for spreading his videos, then it is kind of like a pyramid scheme.

Honestly, telling people they would get rich by spamming his videos is by far the funniest thing Tate ever did.

Last week, the Real World Portal app was removed from Google’s Play store after claims that it was an illegal pyramid scheme and encouraged misogyny.

On Friday night Apple also said it had removed it from its app store. It followed a letter from the legal firm asking Apple to consider whether the app was in line with its policies and whether the company was exposing itself to any corporate liability in hosting it on its platform.

Part of the letter, dated 15 September, said: “We are writing because our clients are extremely concerned that you are hosting Tate’s Real World Portal (RWP) mobile application on your Apple Store … In continuing to host RWP, not only is Apple potentially indirectly financing Tate’s alleged criminal activities but is aiding the spread of his misogynistic teachings.”

Okay, well.

Okay.

This seems a bit similar to the Russell Brand situation, where the government is telling people to ban him.

Related: Rumble Refuses to Demonetize Russell Brand Following UK Government’s Letter

But it’s hard to look at this as though something of value was lost. I don’t really see anywhere good this can go.

Russell Brand, on the other hand, is actually helping take things in a good direction. Just as a general matter. He doesn’t talk about Jews, but his materials are on point (insofar as you can be on point without talking about the Jews).

Tate said he was “breaking out of the Matrix,” then said to do scams to get rich so women will give you attention. That is literally the Matrix. The Matrix is believing your value as a man is dependent on what women think of you.

The real alpha move would be to get rich and then use your money to kill women and get away with it.

No, no, just joking. Don’t do that.

The real alpha move is to get rich and not buy a Bugatti (buy like, an F-150 Raptor), and then get a teenage bride and not let her leave the house, and then barely ever see her and don’t think about women at all.

]]> Rumble Refuses to Demonetize Russell Brand Following UK Government’s Letter https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/22/rumble-refuses-to-demonetize-russell-brand-following-uk-governments-letter/ Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

This is disturbing.
A parliamentary committee is trying to get TikTok and Rumble to demonetise #RussellBrand, even though he hasn’t been arrested, charged or convicted of any crime whatsoever.
The rule of law has been abandoned in the UK.
We are now a #fascist country. pic.twitter.com/lmxRL27ezL

— Paul Golding (@GoldingBF) September 20, 2023

Related: YouTube Demonetizes Russell Brand’s Channel Over Sexual Misconduct Allegations

Rumble are the only niggas in these tubes keeping it real.

Seriously – it’s the only platform that follows 2016 rules on censorship.

And now they’re following 2018 rules on rape hoaxes.

True bros.

The Guardian:

Rumble, a video-sharing platform used by Russell Brand, has accused a parliamentary committee of “deeply inappropriate” behaviour after it asked whether the site would suspend payments to the comedian.

Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative chair of the culture, media and sport committee, wrote this week to Rumble’s chief executive, Chris Pavlovski, to express concern that Brand “may be able to profit from his content on the platform”.

Rumble posted its response on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, claiming that it was “deeply inappropriate and dangerous” of parliament to “attempt to control who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so”.

There is obviously a threat inside of the demand.

Like always.

Probably, a platform like Rumble can’t really exist very much longer. They will either crack or be cracked.

But it’s nice for now.

Dinenage wrote to Rumble after YouTube announced on Tuesday that Brand would no longer receive advertising revenues from his videos.

Dinenage asked whether Brand was able to make money from his videos on Rumble, including his denials of accusations against him, and if so, whether the platform would follow YouTube’s lead.

“We would like to know whether Rumble intends to join YouTube in suspending Mr Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform,” Dinenage wrote. The MP also asked what Rumble was doing to ensure that content creators did not use the platform to undermine the welfare of victims of “inappropriate and potentially illegal behaviour”.

Brand is apparently not planning on fleeing the country, and is instead choosing to go to prison forever.

It’s a shame, but hey – he can’t say I didn’t warn him.

Related: Alleged Ex-Girlfriend of Russell Brand Calls for Maxing Out the “Age of Consent”

]]> YouTube Demonetizes Russell Brand’s Channel Over Sexual Misconduct Allegations https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/19/youtube-demonetizes-russell-brands-channel-over-sexual-misconduct-allegations/ Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Julia blasts YouTube for the “outrageous” suspension of the monetisation on Russell Brand’s channel.

“It’s not YouTube’s job to sit as judge and jury on Russell Brand! They’ve got no right to get involved in this.”@JuliaHB1 | @Tom_Slater_ pic.twitter.com/mtrRMhVgzE

— TalkTV (@TalkTV) September 19, 2023

Previously: All Broadcasters Investigating Russell Brand

It’s surprising YouTube didn’t just ban him outright.

They’ve been waiting to do that.

The Guardian:

YouTube has suspended Russell Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform following allegations of rape and sexual assault in a massive hit to his finances.

The video-sharing and social media site said it had suspended Brand’s channel from the YouTube partner programme after serious allegations against him, meaning his videos are no longer able to be monetised on the platform.

The 48-year-old comedian and actor has been accused of rape, assault and emotional abuse between 2006 and 2013, when he was at the height of his fame working for the BBC, Channel 4 and starring in Hollywood films. He denies the allegations, saying all his relationships were consensual.

The Met police said on Monday they had received an allegation of sexual assault in Soho, central London, in 2003. The force added that as yet no investigation had been launched.

Suspending Brand’s ability to earn money from his YouTube channel is a major blow to the comedian’s finances. YouTube pays creators a cut of the money it earns from showing adverts next to their videos, which can be a highly lucrative business.

Brand had prepared for this eventuality by moving many of his videos across to rival site Rumble, although this a relatively niche outlet that does not give Brand access to the 6.5 million subscribers he has built up during a decade on YouTube.

Although Brand no longer works for mainstream media outlets, his alternative media empire still relies on several online platforms such as YouTube that host his content and process payments. Brand’s book publisher has already said it will pause future projects with the performer.

A spokesperson for YouTube said: “We have suspended monetisation on Russell Brand’s channel for violating our creator responsibility policy. If a creator’s off-platform behaviour harms our users, employees or ecosystem, we take action to protect the community.”

Industry experts have estimated Brand probably makes between £2,000 to £4,000 a video, which,, based on five videos a week, could produce close to £1m a year.

Not sure when allegations – without any criminal charges – became the standard for punishing people.

I guess that change took place sometime in mid-2020. Maybe we’re just noticing it now.

It’s strange, because now anyone who doesn’t like someone can destroy their life by accusing him of something.

]]>