It would be shocking if this wasn’t happening, given what we already know.

Washington Times:

Rank-and-file FBI agents are accusing the Biden administration of exaggerating the threat of White supremacists and pressuring agents to cook up domestic terrorist cases involving racist extremists.

Current and former FBI agents told The Washington Times that the perceived White supremacist threat is overblown by the administration. They said top bureau officials are pressuring FBI agents to create domestic terrorist cases and tag people as White supremacists to meet internal metrics.

“The demand for White supremacy” coming from FBI headquarters “vastly outstrips the supply of White supremacy,” said one agent, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “We have more people assigned to investigate White supremacists than we can actually find.”

The agents’ revelations coincide with President Biden’s “United We Stand” summit Thursday at the White House. The summit built upon the administration’s push to root out racially motivated domestic violent extremists, which included the creation of a specialized Justice Department unit to combat domestic terrorism.

The FBI agent, who did not want to be identified talking about bureau politics, said those driving bureau policies “have already determined that White supremacy is a problem” and set an agency-wide policy to elevate racially motivated domestic extremism cases as priorities.

There aren’t any “white supremacist terrorists.”

Biden rolled out Heather Heyer’s mother the other day – Nurgle, the Plague Lord – because that whale Heather having a heart attack as the result of a car accident in Charlottesville in 2017 is the only thing they have that they can claim is a terrorist attack.

Charlottesville was some kind of planned hoax by the FBI. It was a setup. They thought they could get a bunch of people killed, instead all they got was a car crash. A scared kid who was being chased by Antifa with guns crashed his car and then started crying and they convicted him of “murder” and sentenced him to 400 years in prison.

I’m convinced that most or all of the planners of Charlottesville were working with the FBI. This is what they do – they set people up, they create fake events, they use them to push a narrative for the Democrats.

The Intercept had a good article in 2019 recounting some of the stuff about the way the FBI works.

From it:

To this day, the FBI lacks a statutory charter clearly outlining the bureau’s authority and its limits. Instead, the FBI’s powers and jurisdiction are set by the executive branch in the form of guidelines issued by the attorney general. These guidelines, technically subject to change under each DOJ administration, have been repeatedly relaxed through the bureau’s history. The current guidelines, set under former Attorney General Michael Mukasey in 2008, give the FBI authority to conduct both “predicated investigations,” based on factual evidence of crimes or threats to national security, and “assessments,” which require no such factual basis.

The standards for opening an assessment are extraordinarily low, the Defending Rights & Dissent report notes. Yet the FBI is allowed extremely intrusive investigative techniques in performing them, including physical surveillance, the use of informants, and pretextual interviews during which agents can misstate the purpose of the interview in order to elicit incriminating statements and even conceal their status as federal officials.

Also leading to abuse is the FBI’s reliance on a network of more than 175 “Joint Terrorism Task Forces” that bring together agents with members from hundreds of state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies. Because JTTFs, as they are called in national security lingo, are run by the FBI, they operate under FBI guidelines, which provide fewer protections for speech, privacy, and civil liberties than the rules governing local police and other law enforcement. While local pushback has so far led two cities — San Francisco and Portland, Oregon — to leave their task forces, JTTFs remain a key tool for the policing of dissent. “The FBI’s ability to do harm is somewhat held in check just by its small size,” said German. “But when it engages in partnerships with state and local law enforcement, that exponentially increases the size of the FBI.”

It’s worth going through the whole thing. It has a leftist slant, claiming they’re doing all this stuff to brown gay Islamic BIPOC from the trans folks community. But they’re doing it all to normal white people.

Here’s a worthwhile video about the history of FBI entrapment hoaxes.

The FBI is literally just a criminal cartel that runs America like the cartels of Mexico run their territory. No, no. That’s not fair. It’s so much worse than anything the Mexican cartels do. The comparison is just that this is a visible criminal organization that controls the whole country. It’s a gang. There’s no other way to describe it. It exists outside of the law.

The media does these reports and Hollywood makes these entertainment films acting like the FBI is something good, or they have anything at all to do. It’s literally no different – at all – from the Soviet KGB. They are a secret police, which exists to dominate the population.

The FBI should be abolished. We like Tucker Carlson, but he said a few weeks ago that “we need an FBI.”

Why?

What do they do?

All they do is dirty low-down tricks and schemes. We went a long time without an FBI. They were only formed in 1908 and really got power after World War II.

Here’s the reality: if there is any group of bad guys so big that they can’t be handled by your local sheriff, then send in the National Guard.

Then bring in Claire Redfield to finish them off.

(If you catch my drift.)

The fact is, you can’t think of any problem that the FBI is needed to deal with, because there is no such problem. It’s all a spook – the whole concept of these nebulous threats that only a federal law agency can handle.

There is no need for a federal law enforcement agency, and its mere existence violates the Constitution.

These people are about to start really giving us all hell. It’s already happening.

Candace Owens, also known as Der Schwarze Fuhrer, is here to explain the whole thing

You might not remember this, but Kim Kardashian is famous because she released a home made porno with some black guy.

It’s very retro to have this coming out 20 years after the fact.

Breitbart:

Singer Ray J, who once appeared in a sex tape with Kim Kardashian, slammed her mother Kris Jenner in an Instagram video on Saturday, claiming that Jenner reviewed multiple videos featuring her daughter and him having sexual intercourse, and chose which one to release to the public.

“Kris, you know what you did. I’m about to show people what you did,” Ray J said in a 44-minute Instagram video. “Me and Kim, we signed a contract the same exact day for the same amount of money, $400,000.”

“You wanna see the sex tape contract?” Ray J said elsewhere in the lengthy video, before showing a purported image of paperwork revealing they were both paid $400,000.

Ray J on one pic.twitter.com/BiQvpJ3UJi

— koop velaryon (@koopa_kinte) September 11, 2022

“So here’s what happened. Kim’s rushing me, her mom’s rushing me, like, ‘Get this shit done, get it signed.’ Kim’s with me while I’m signing my contract. She’s like, ‘Hurry up, babe,’” Ray J continued of the sex tape contract, which he said gave the company Vivid the right to sell the video.

The singer added that he was told, “We like the tape, but we need you to go do it one more time in Santa Barbara — even though you’re not together — for safety.”

Ray J also displayed a page from the purported contract, which listed three separate sex tapes.

After going through the videos one last time, they chose the older one, because “it showed Kim in a better light,” he said.

“The other one was just too raunchy. Okay, I know. I did it. We were like kids, we were like, ‘Where the money at? I’m ready to go buy this fucking car’ — and then fast-forward to now, my daughter and son are, like,” Ray J said before pausing, appearing to become emotional.

‘That shit is fucked up,” he finally said. “I only got emotional for my kids. I love my kids. This ain’t over with.”

Ray J also noted Jenner’s recent appearance on the Late Late Show with James Corden, where she answered questions from James Corden while hooked up to an apparent polygraph machine.

In one question, Corden asked, “Did you help Kim release her sex tape?” to which Jenner replied, “No.” The lie detector examiner, John Grogan, then said that Jenner was telling the truth.

“The lie detector dude you had was a fraud,” Ray J said in his video. “There has to be some kind of industry crime for that.”

In his Instagram video, Ray J also mentioned a recent episode of The Kardashians, in which Kim Kardashian’s ex-husband rapper Kanye West allegedly recovers a computer, which was said to contain more footage of him and Kim.

The singer appeared to react to that by pulling out a phone and displaying a purported Instagram direct messages (DM) that he sent to Kim Kardashian in April, which read as follows:

Why are you playing games Kim – I’ve been nothing but a team player – we all had an agreement – now you are trying to drag my name for your new show and that ain’t cool! It fucks up my business and relationships – when we sat down with [Vivid CEO] Steve Hirsch and your mom and we planned all of this together now you really are taking this lie to the next level making me look crazy – I don’t wanna expose the real shit that we did but you are leaving me no choice!

Kanye said you wanted the footage and I gave him all of the videos and pics and texts from me and you [because] I was trying to make things OK and make you feel better – now I realize this is another promo stunt for you – unless you reach out to me soon I’m gonna take it to the next level where it shows all of what we did – all of the meetings and [conversations] about the plan – date and times for our meetings and the whole lie you and Kris planned since the beginning – this is not a threat – you’ve taken this too far.

You know what we did! Your mom controlled this whole sex tape deal with Joe Francis and Steve Hirsch – it was her idea to put out the tape with Vivid – all I did was agree – now you wanna make it seem like I’m doing it again without your control – all those fake tears – your fans trusting you to be honest and sincere but it’s all fake for the cameras – I was playing my part until you started doing all of this! Why are you trying to ruin me when you know I was just a player in this! You have to stop believing your own lies!

“Everybody wins but me,” Ray J told Kim Kardashian elsewhere in his messages. “I’m the bad guy every time. I’m tired of being the villain. I did this for us in the beginning but now without your support it fucks me over bad.”

I don’t think he’s faking the paperwork.

How does a show this fake manage to be this boring?

The Anglin Argument on the coronavirus has been consistent from the beginning: coronavirus is not killing anyone who wouldn’t have died from something else.

The evidence for this argument is very simple: the total death toll of 2020 is not increased over the average death toll of any given year.

Maybe the virus is killing people, but those are people who would have caught another bug, such as the flu, and died regardless. That is what the total deaths statistic means. What that means is that the virus is not changing the dynamics of life and death, meaning that there is no reason to change our lives to attempt to control it.

The Johns Hopkins University, homebase of the conspiracy to push this fraud on the public, published an article that admitted that the death toll is not rising over any other year on their News-Letter website on November 22. On 26, they retracted the article, saying that it was being used by people to spread “false information” about the virus.

The article also, fascinatingly, admitted that heart attack deaths are being labeled as coronavirus deaths.

This article has been saved in an archive and in a pdf file provided by Johns Hopkins, given that it is generally considered a violation of journalistic ethics to delete an article.

From the piece:

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception?

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

But here’s the money shot:

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

There you have it.

In so many words, this is an absolute admission that the entire thing is a hoax. That said, the data, which I have continually pointed to, existed before the Johns Hopkins University admitted what the data obviously meant.

I have pushed this from the beginning: the total deaths are not increasing, which means anyone dying of coronavirus either did die from something else, or would have died from something else.

You might be saying: “Anglin, this must feel great to have Johns Hopkins admitting what you’ve been saying all along!”

The answer to that is: “No, actually no, it doesn’t.”

I already knew I was right, because I already had the total death numbers. I already had Deborah Birx admitting that she falsely classifies deaths as coronavirus-related when people die of other causes.

I didn’t need my argument confirmed by “authorities,” because I already knew I was right.

All this admission does is make me even more angry.

The coronavirus, in the sense of the claim that this is a deadly virus that is some kind of a threat, is literally a hoax. Now, the leading medical authority in the country is admitting that it is a hoax. And yet, they’ve apologized for admitting that it was a hoax, and said that they didn’t mean for people to use their admission that it is a hoax to imply that it is a hoax.

This is actually infuriating. The leading medical authority in the country can say “sure, this is just a hoax,” while pointing to data that proves definitively that it is a hoax, and then the same thing that was happening can continue to happen.

It just proves the other thing that I’ve been saying from the beginning: Democracy is not a viable system of government, because the masses of peasants are so very easily manipulated by the media.

There is literally no way to end this hoax without someone in authority declaring that it has ended. There is no reality in which you convince the masses of people that it is fake and they should resist. They do not care about reality, they simply care about doing what they are told to do, because it feels good to them to do as they are told.

If any authority is confronted with this data, they will say “yes, but we have to do the lockdown anyway, because we can’t risk it.” They will not understand what risk exists when we know no one is dying, they will simply rely on the media, which has created all of this fear.

The truly amazing takeaway from the fact that coronavirus has caused no deaths is that this lockdown is going to end up causing untold death. We still aren’t seeing the economic fallout from the lockdown, because the government is continuing to print money. But when that happens, untold numbers are going to die from suicide and drugs. In the third world, people will starve.

That’s aside from the lives that it is destroying. When all is said and done, virtually everyone who is not a billionaire or a government official will have had their lives destroyed by this hoax. Job loss, divorce, mental illness – the scope of destruction is incomprehensible.

On top of that, we’ve surrendered all of our civil rights to the government, becoming the single most oppressed population that has ever existed in all of history. None of those freedoms are ever coming back.

We have to remember the people who did this to us. We cannot ever forgive them for it.

FULL DELETED ARTICLE FOLLOWS

The current state of media, as Alex Jones recently quoted me as saying (without attribution), has nothing at all to do with the First Amendment. Gigantic media corporations are colluding together to defraud the public on a massive scale, by purposefully lying to them, and purposefully attacking and shutting down any attempt to respond to the lies.

It is a criminal conspiracy.

It has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with free speech or freedom of the press.

These fake news kikes are colluding directly with the deep state kikes in a seditious conspiracy.

So Republicans are absolutely right to believe that the government should have the right to shut these people down.

Of course the Jews are freaking out that this means about 25% of the country thinks Trump should be able to arbitrarily have them arrested – and are falling back on the Constitution they so hate as a defense.

Remember, these are the exact same Jews celebrating the shut down of Alex Jones screeching about their rights to free speech (but it’s different tho because America is an anarcho-capitalist nation, where the government regulates no private company ever).

Daily Beast:

Freedom of the press may be guaranteed in the Constitution. But a plurality of Republicans want to give President Trump the authority to close down certain news outlets, according to a new public opinion survey conducted by Ipsosand provided exclusively to The Daily Beast.

The findings present a sobering picture for the fourth estate, with respondents showing diminished trust in the media and increased support for punitive measures against its members. They also illustrate the extent to which Trump’s anti-press drumbeat has shaped public opinion about the role the media plays in covering his administration.

All told, 43 percent of self-identified Republicans said that they believed “the president should have the authority to close news outlets engaged in bad behavior.” Only 36 percent disagreed with that statement. When asked if Trump should close down specific outlets, including CNN, The Washington Post, and The New York Times, nearly a quarter of Republicans (23 percent) agreed and 49 percent disagreed.

Republicans were far more likely to take a negative view of the media. Forty-eight percent of them said they believed “the news media is the enemy of the American people” (just 28 percent disagreed) while nearly four out of every five (79 percent) said that they believed “the mainstream media treats President Trump unfairly.”

Honestly, there is no need to just arbitrarily shut down media outlets.

All you would need to do is open an investigation and start issuing subpoenas.

Basically, there are already existing laws against fraud that these people have broken repeatedly. There are also conspiracy and sedition laws they have broken. There is no need for some new sweeping presidential power to shut down the media, as this poll – designed to be a fear-stoker – suggests.

The faking of “anonymous sources” alone – and colluding to fake these sources, with government officials and across media outlets, for the purpose of using monopoly power over information to shift political views with an intent to unseat an elected President is clearly and plainly illegal. It is sedition.

The collusion to shut down opposing views – a conspiracy to silence dissent against their narrative, as they’ve done to me and Alex Jones – would also be further proof of a conspiracy.

But just opening up all of their emails – this wouldn’t be hard to do it all legally, and have the majority of mainstream journalists thrown in prison or executed.

Plan #2

I would at this point support Trump just arresting or ordering the summary execution or assassination of journalists, though I would insist that he first declare martial law and then declare them enemy combatants.

I have full faith in Trump, but we should always first respect the rule of law.

• They were showcased in lavish show of muscle last month in Pyongyang
• But experts cry fake after studying series of high-definition photographs
• One claims ‘undulating skin’ on warheads would render them unable to fly
• Another claims no evidence of ‘retro rockets’, crucial for long-distance flight

The North Korean long-range missiles that jangled nerves across the world when paraded through Pyongyang last month were ‘almost certainly’ fake, government experts and independent researchers have claimed.

The weapons, which were showcased in a lavish show of military muscle to mark the 60th anniversary of the Korean war armistice, were heavily criticised by researchers who insisted they would be unable to fly let alone unleash a deadly attack on the US.

The revelation casts further doubt on the hermit nation’s bellicose showboating after its failed Unha-3 rocket launch in April 2012.

‘My opinion is that it’s a big hoax,’ said Markus Schiller, an aerospace engineer in Munich and former RAND Corp. military analyst.

He said he saw no evidence of ‘retro rockets’ on the back of the Hwasong-13s, hardware that is necessary to propel them into sub-orbital space and strike faraway targets.

James Oberg, an NBC News space and missile expert who witnessed first hand the 2012 failed launch, agreed, pointing to ‘undulating skin’ in the warheads that proves they are bogus.

‘Upper-stage missile skin has got to be really smooth, or else it sets off high-speed turbulent air flow that can both heat the region and also create localized drag effects that can pull the missile far off attitude (direction), or even pull it sideways and thus lead to loss of control and disintegration,’ he said.

Schiller added that North Korea also seems to be trying to inflate the number of Hwasong-13s it claims to possess, saying it reproduces old pictures of warheads to pass them off as new

‘I can tell that on the mock-ups, they simply changed the markings and serial numbers from last year’s parade to make it look like they have more missiles,’ he said.

It is not the first time North Korea’s missile capabilities have been called into question.

In 2012, experts claimed the North Korean missiles that were paraded as part of the 100th anniversary celebrations of the country’s founding father, Kim Il Sung, were also probably fakes.

Read More