fake rape – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Sat, 25 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png fake rape – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Total Aryan Victory: Prosecutors Will Press No “Slut Abuse” Charges Against Marilyn Manson! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/25/total-aryan-victory-prosecutors-will-press-no-slut-abuse-charges-against-marilyn-manson/ Sat, 25 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Now that Donald Trump has vaccinated the public against the woke mind virus, there are once again a statute of limitations on sexual abuse hoaxes!

Harvey Weinstein didn’t get any statute of limitations, because of the woke mind virus.

Harvey tried to fight the woke mind virus and the court showed everyone pictures of his deformed penis.

Now the woke mind virus has been vaccinated against by Donald Trump’s new Operation Warp Speed.

The Guardian:

Prosecutors said on Friday that they will not file charges against Marilyn Manson after a years-long investigation of allegations of sexual assault and domestic violence.

The Los Angeles county district attorney, Nathan Hochman, said the allegations were too old under the law and the evidence was not sufficient to charge the 56-year-old shock rocker whose legal name is Brian Warner.

“We have determined that allegations of domestic violence fall outside of the statute of limitations, and we cannot prove charges of sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt,” Hochman said. “We recognize and applaud the courage and resilience of the women who came forward to make reports and share their experiences, and we thank them for their cooperation and patience with the investigation.”

Nearly four years after the investigation began, the then district attorney, George Gascón, said on 9 October that his office was pursuing new leads that added to the “already extensive” file that authorities had amassed.

LA county sheriff’s detectives said early in 2021 that they were investigating Manson for incidents between 2009 and 2011 in West Hollywood, where Manson lived at the time. The investigation included a search warrant that was served on his West Hollywood home. The case was initially turned over to prosecutors in September 2021, but the Los Angeles county district attorney’s office requested more evidence-gathering and the investigation resumed.

The identities of the women police and prosecutors spoke to were not revealed, but the Game of Thrones actor Esmé Bianco – who sued Manson in a case that has been settled – said she was part of the criminal investigation. Before the decision not to prosecute, she criticized how long the process was taking at a rally for Hochman, who was elected soon after.

This bitch played one of the whores in Game of Thrones, then she dated the BDSM shock rocker guy and gets really surprised he is abusive!

 

Who cares about that bitch? I wish he would have abused her much worsely!

In 2021 his former fiancee, the Westworld actor Evan Rachel Wood, named him as her abuser for the first time in an Instagram post.

Wood and Manson’s relationship became public in 2007 when he was 38 and she was 19, and they were briefly engaged in 2010 before breaking up.

Oh yes, an age gap, such abuse!

How could she know the extremist was extreme, when she was a mere child of 19 years young?

We need to put these sluts in jail for these hoaxes if we truly want to eradicate the remaining infected cells of the woke mind virus.

They cause all these problems, waste police resources, waste how much money from the people they accuse, then they just walk free with many accolades from the woke establishment?

We have to smash the wokies and we need to start by smashing the sluts who do these rape hoaxes.

]]>
Court Orders Conor McGregor Pay €250,000 to Bloated Slug-Like Slut https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/11/23/court-orders-conor-mcgregor-pay-e250000-to-bloated-slug-like-slut/ Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000

EXPLAINED: Nikita Hand has won her civil assault claim against Conor McGregor#NikitaHand #ConorMcGregor #BreakingNews pic.twitter.com/U1XL6IhOMk

— Virgin Media News (@VirginMediaNews) November 22, 2024

As soon as Conor came out and support the nationalist protests against the niggervasion, and suggested he was going to seize control of the government, he got hit with a rape hoax.

The result, however, doesn’t mean much. The fine is not a significant amount of money for him, and none of his supporters think he raped this fat whore or care if he did that.

For the record, I believe Conor is a Christian man and probably didn’t cheat on his wife who he’s been with since he was a teenager. But he’s also a standard Irishman, and might have done so. Who knows? Who cares? It’s not really anyone’s business, is it?

The Guardian:

A jury at a civil trial at Ireland’s high court has found that the Irish martial arts fighter Conor McGregor assaulted a woman who had accused him of raping her at a hotel in Dublin in December 2018.

McGregor was ordered to pay nearly €250,000 (£210,000) in damages to Nikita Hand, who is also known as Nikita Ní Laimhín.

Nikita Hand (they call her that because her face looks like the palm of an obese person’s hand)

Lawyers for Hand had accused McGregor, 36, of “brutally raping and battering” her after she invited him to join her and a friend at a work Christmas party.

Hand also alleged that another man, James Lawrence, who joined the party, sexually assaulted her. The jury found that Lawrence did not assault Hand.

So she was lying about one man but telling the truth about the other?

She was proven to be lying about one part of a specific event, but telling the truth about the other part?

Really?

The jury found that?

Speaking outside the court after the verdict, Hand, 35, told reporters that she was “overwhelmed” by the support she had received. She thanked her family and a staff member from a rape crisis centre who had sat beside her throughout “this entire period”, including the two-week trial.

…

McGregor had denied the allegations, saying that he had “fully consensual sex” with Hand. He also denied causing bruising to her. He told the court that Hand’s accusations against him were “full of lies” verging on “fantasy”.

Ireland needs a full revolution, and Conor is the only man who can lead it.

We should expect more attacks on him as he continues to gather his forces for the Great Battle of Dublin.

]]>
RFK Jr. Texts Babysitter, Telling Her He’s Sorry If He Hurt Her Feelings https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/13/rfk-jr-texts-babysitter-telling-her-hes-sorry-if-he-hurt-her-feelings/ Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been accused of s*xual abuse by a former family nanny.

The alleged incident occurred in 1999, when the woman, Eliza Cooney, then in her 20s, says a 45-year-old Kennedy stood behind her in the kitchen of his Mount Kisco, New York, home and groped her… pic.twitter.com/Jm5cp4sLOd

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 5, 2024

Previously: RFK Jr. Shrugs Off Babysitter Groping Accusations, Basically Admits It, Says He’s Done Way Worse Shit

RFK didn’t even rape this babysitter. He didn’t even jack-off in front of her or anything.

Personally, if my kids had a hot babysitter, I would make 50 Shades of Gray look like Winnie the Pooh.

No, no, I joke. I wouldn’t do BDSM on the babysitter. I would rape her for years though.

All RFK did was ask the slut to oil his back.

A nigga’s back needs oiled, bitch.

Sorry.

Reuters:

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr has apologized to a former family babysitter who accused him of sexual assault, the woman told Reuters on Friday.

The woman, Eliza Cooney, told Vanity Fair in an article earlier this month that Kennedy groped her in the family kitchen when she was employed as a part-time babysitter in the late 1990s by Kennedy and his then-wife Mary Richardson.

…

“I read your description of an episode in which I touched you in an unwanted manner,” Kennedy said in a text message sent to Cooney that was seen by Reuters. Reuters verified it was Kennedy’s cellphone number using TLOxp, a service that provides public and proprietary data.

“I have no memory of this incident,” the text continues, “but I apologize sincerely for anything I ever did that made you feel uncomfortable or anything I did or said that offended you or hurt your feelings.”

“If I hurt you, it was inadvertent. I feel badly for doing so.”

This is sort of hilarious.

It’s much less gay than a public apology.

Personally, I would have accused the bitch of trying to have sex with me, and said “I’m a married man, and this slut is trying to oil me up!”

]]>
Two French Rugby Players Arrested in Argentina After Woman Regrets Sex in Hotel Room https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/13/two-french-rugby-players-arrested-in-argentina-after-woman-regrets-sex-in-hotel-room/ Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

🇫🇷🏉 Two French #rugby players have been accused of multiple counts of rape and of beating a woman following a game in #Argentina.

Oscar Jegou and Hugo Auradou were transferred to the city of Mendoza where the crimes allegedly took place.

⚠️ Some details may be distressing ⤵️ pic.twitter.com/GVmnGfadGo

— FRANCE 24 English (@France24_en) July 12, 2024

There are 12-year-old boys on the gay sex app Grindr. No one does anything about it. You would actually probably get investigated by the FBI for complaining about it.

But all heterosexual sex is now illegal. Literally, any time you have sex with a woman, you can be charged with some kind of crime. There is no way, in a Western country, to have sex with a woman and be 100% sure you won’t be charged with a crime.

This includes sex with your wife. She can charge you with a crime.

Then these people come at you like “oh, sorry to tell you, but you’re not breeding, so we have to replace your entire population with niggers.”

The Guardian:

Prosecutors in Argentina have charged two French rugby players with aggravated rape, in the grisly case of a woman who said she was repeatedly assaulted by the athletes after they took her back to their hotel room and prevented her from leaving.

Did they kidnap her?

What does “took her back to their hotel room” mean?

Did they use duct tape?

The prosecutor’s office in the western city of Mendoza – where the alleged assault took place last Sunday following the French team’s test match against the Argentinian Pumas – ordered the two players, Oscar Jegou and Hugo Auradou, to remain in detention until trial.

Hugo Auradou

Oscar Jegou

After being arrested in Buenos Aires, Jegou, 21, and Auradou, 20, were transferred 1,000km (620 miles) to Mendoza on Thursday for their first court appearance. They chose not to testify in Friday’s hearing.

The French Rugby Federation had previously said that the players admitted to having consensual sex with the alleged victim and denied any acts of violence.

…

The woman says that after meeting the players at a nightclub, she was taken to their hotel room and subjected to violent, non-consensual sexual acts and prevented from leaving. After escaping the hotel room, Romano said the victim filed a police complaint and underwent physical examinations.

This is just so goofy.

And it never stops.

It just keeps getting goofier.

Listen, slut: if you don’t want to have sex, don’t go to the hotel room of aggressive men. In fact, slut: don’t go to the club at all. If you are drunk at a club and decide to go to a hotel room to get fucked by sports players, that is your decision.

If you don’t like that decision you made, make different decisions.

]]>
French Prosecutors Push Rape Charges on Director for Years-Long Rape Spree https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/05/french-prosecutors-push-rape-charges-on-director-for-years-long-rape-spree/ Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Previously: France: Cops Detain Two Directors After Actress Says She Didn’t Consent to Sex 36 Years Ago

So, France is doing this now. They’ve gone full vagina.

And their new laws are being applied retroactively, just like in the US.

I’m getting pretty tired of lectures by the French.

The Guardian:

French prosecutors have requested film director Benoît Jacquot be charged with raping actors Isild Le Besco and Julia Roy, the Paris prosecutor’s office told AFP on Wednesday.

Jacquot, 77, was held for questioning on Monday after actor Judith Godrèche, 52, filed a complaint against him this year for allegedly raping her during a relationship of several years that started when she was 14.

Le Besco, 41, then filed a complaint over alleged rape during a relationship with Jacquot that also started when she was underage, and Roy, 34, accused him of sexual assault.

Jacquot has denied all accusations.

Prosecutors appeared not to request charges against Jacquot linked to Godrèche’s accusations for the time being. But they have asked an examining magistrate to charge him over “rape, sexual assault and violence” allegedly committed against Roy, likely between 2013 and 2018.

Benoît Jacquot and Julia Roy while he was committing sexual violence against her.

Prosecutors additionally sought charges over “rape of a minor by person with authority” and “rape by a partner” allegedly committed against Le Besco, likely between 1998 and 2000, and then in 2007.

Good job, France. You’re America now. We know you always wanted to be. And now you are. Great work.

This is actually much more extreme than the Weinstein thing, frankly.

Weinstein was physically repulsive. Jacquot was handsome. He’s nearly 80, and I can still see him going around with young bitches.

Also, what Weinstein was doing was more or less secret.

Jacquot just went around with these women in public, them always smiling and looking very proud of themselves for being with the famous artistic man.

Isild Le Besco and Benoît Jacquot. You can see the pain in her face from all of that raping.

This woman thing has to stop.

If they want to be liberated and have sex with whoever they want, they can’t then say “actually, that was rape, because I am completely powerless and unable to make my own decisions.”

Otherwise, we need a different solution.

I have a different solution.

You might like it.

]]>
France: Cops Detain Two Directors After Actress Says She Didn’t Consent to Sex 36 Years Ago https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/02/france-cops-detain-two-directors-after-actress-says-she-didnt-consent-to-sex-36-years-ago/ Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Judith Godrèche when she was 14.

What is the point of being rich and famous if every woman you have sex with can accuse you of raping them at any time for the rest of your life, and you will literally be arrested by cops?

The Guardian:

French authorities detained leading film directors Benoît Jacquot and Jacques Doillon on Monday for questioning over accusations of sexual abuse, sources close to the case said.

Jacques Doillon and Benoît Jacquot.

Actor and director Judith Godrèche, 52, has formally accused Jacquot of rape and Doillon of sexual assault when she was a minor, accusations both men deny. She has described Jacquot of having an unhealthy “hold” over her during a relationship that started when she was 14, and lasted from 1986 to 1992. She has accused Doillon of abuse on set when she acted in one of his films.

Jeez, man.

Can you imagine raping someone for six years?

I don’t care how hot the bitch is, I’d get worn out.

Judith Godrèche and Benoît Jacquot during the tortuous, years-long rape spree.

To be clear, she was literally living with this guy and appearing in public with him.

Lawyers for Jacquot and Doillon said it was not necessary to detain the men while they were being questioned, and stressed that they should be considered innocent until proven guilty. Jacquot’s lawyer, Julia Minkowski, said her client would “finally be able to express himself before the law”. Doillon’s attorney, Marie Dose, said no legal criteria could justify his being detained for questioning “36 years” after the incident alleged by Godrèche. The sources close to the case said their interrogation could include a confrontation with the person or persons accusing them.

This is leaning into the modern idea that there was a big problem with the age gap because of Marxist “power dynamics” theory.

But they’re also doing the Weinstein thing that there were power dynamics because he was rich.

Just how helpless are women? They lose the ability to control their own physical actions around rich older men?

If they really have that kind of weakness, should we really be claiming that they are powerful and putting them in positions of power?

Based on this theory, if there was a woman president, a man who was richer and older than her could come and force her to do things by using his power dynamics.

What if the rich older man was Russian?

He could force a woman president to play straight out of the Kremlin handbook.

]]>
Despite There Being No Criminal Charges, Matt Gaetz is Accused by Committee of Having Low Ethics https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/06/20/despite-there-being-no-criminal-charges-matt-gaetz-is-accused-by-committee-of-having-low-ethics/ Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000

The House ethics committee is continuing to probe allegations that Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz “engaged in sexual misconduct and illicit drug use” and that he “sought to obstruct government investigations of his conduct.”@rachelvscott has more exclusive details. pic.twitter.com/kncba0lVdG

— Good Morning America (@GMA) June 19, 2024

Thomas Massie is the only Congressman who actually represents what I believe.

However, Matt Gaetz would be the second closest.

Having two Congressmen who maybe sort of represent the America people is not actually a threat to the government (and if anything, it makes it seem more legitimate than it actually is), but the Jews are obsessed with having zero legitimate Congressmen.

So, you get rape hoaxed.

The Guardian:

A bipartisan Capitol Hill committee is investigating Matt Gaetz, the far-right Republican congressman and vocal Donald Trump supporter, over longstanding allegations of sexual misconduct, illicit drug use and other alleged ethical breaches, it said on Tuesday.

The announcement by the House ethics committee – which contains an equal number of Democrats and Republicans – reignited a swirl of scandal surrounding the outspoken Trump ally that had abated somewhat after an earlier criminal investigation into allegations against him was dropped.

In a statement, the committee said it had spoken to dozens of witnesses, issued 25 subpoenas, and reviewed thousands of pages of documents as part of its long-running investigation into Gaetz’s conduct, which was initially opened in April 2021.

Source

As a result of that review, the committee said, certain allegations deserved further examination.

“The committee is reviewing allegations … that Representative Gaetz may have: engaged in sexual misconduct and illicit drug use, accepted improper gifts, dispensed special privileges and favours to individuals with whom he had a personal relationship, and sought to obstruct government investigations of his conduct,” it said.

The committee said other allegations made against Gaetz – specifically those of sharing inappropriate images or videos on the House floor, misusing state identification records, improper personal use of campaign funds and accepting a bribe – were no longer being investigated.

The committee’s statement came a day after Gaetz issued what appeared to be a pre-emptive post on X in which he accused it of pursuing “frivolous investigations” into him and compared its tactics to the Soviet Union.

This whole concept of “House ethics” is dumb and illegal.

If Gaetz committed crimes, he should be charged with crimes. Instead, there are no criminal charges, but an “ethics investigation.”

People voted for him. He’s an elected government official. Even if his ethics are very low, that is not relevant to anything.

]]>
Old Women Say David Copperfield Committed “Sexual Misconduct” More Than 30 Years Ago https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/05/17/old-women-say-david-copperfield-committed-sexual-misconduct-more-than-30-years-ago/ Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000

David Copperfield with contestants from the 1991 Look of the Year event in New York City.

This Guardian article is super-long.

Here’s the tl;dr of the allegations:

  • He called a 15-year-old woman and asked her what she was wearing.
  • He grabbed a 15-year-old woman around the waist while posing for photos during a boat party.
  • He spoke to the mother of one of the teens and came off as “creepy.”
  • Someone saw him flirting with a teenage girl.
  • Variations of the above.
  • He took a 17-year-old woman to a bar, drugged her and did something she can’t remember because she blacked out.

The Guardian:

It was September 1991 in New York and the grand finale of Look of the Year, a prestigious modeling contest that had helped launch the careers of supermodels Cindy Crawford and Helena Christensen.

The celebrity magician David Copperfield, one of the judges, watched from the front row as 58 contestants paraded across the runway in their branded hot pink and sorbet yellow swimsuits. Nearly all the contestants were teenagers; some were as young as 14.

Today, more than three decades later, five former contestants say that they were subjected to behavior by Copperfield that they now regard as inappropriate or worse. The women – who were all teenagers at the time – met him at the New York contest in 1991 or three years earlier in Japan, when he was also a judge. Others who attended the events also say they witnessed Copperfield behaving inappropriately towards the girls.

Unfortunately for women, 14 is peak sexual attractiveness for women.

Fortunately for men, 50 is peak sexual attractiveness for men.

The claims include allegations of unwanted sexual touching and sexual harassment. In one case, a former contestant alleges she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Copperfield in the months after the competition. She was 17 years old at the time, she says.

The claims follow a report in yesterday’s Guardian US, which detailed allegations of sexual misconduct and inappropriate behavior by Copperfield from women who had met him in connection with his performances. There was also an allegation of drugging in that story: one woman told the Guardian that she believes she and a friend were drugged by Copperfield before he had sexual relations with them, leaving them unable to consent.

In written responses to questions from the Guardian, lawyers for David Copperfield denied all the allegations of misconduct and inappropriate behavior. Copperfield’s lawyers said he has “never, ever acted inappropriately with anyone, let alone anyone underage”.

I’m not even a big fan of David Copperfield. In fact, I’m not a fan at all.

I think Brittany Spears was a better Vegas act.

But come on.

He’s not accused of rape.

He’s accused of flirting. These metoo allegations are just getting dumber as they run out of better allegations.

]]>
Appeals Court Overturns Harvey Weinstein’s “Rape” Conviction in Massive Victory for All Men https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/04/26/appeals-court-overturns-harvey-weinsteins-rape-conviction-in-massive-victory-for-all-men/ Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000

What Weinstein’s lawyer actually means is, this is a great day for misogynists who believe women lie about rape, and a very dark day for survivors and the justice system. pic.twitter.com/E778ZURXrh

— Dr Charlotte Proudman (@DrProudman) April 25, 2024

See: Consent Theory on Steroids: Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to TWENTY-THREE YEARS IN PRISON

Well, we didn’t expect this.

Apparently, the Harvey Weinstein conviction, based exclusively on one of his girlfriends claiming that at some point in their relationship, they had sex when she didn’t really feel like it. (She had sex with him both before and after the alleged events, but one time, it wasn’t “consensual.”)

This is a massive win for all men.

No one likes Harvey Weinstein, but he didn’t “rape” anyone, and what this ruling did was make it so all forms of normal heterosexual sex could be relabeled “rape,” and men could face decades in prison based on a completely fake crime for which there was no evidence.

Reuters:

Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for sexual assault and rape was overturned by New York’s highest court, reopening the landmark case that fueled the #MeToo movement and highlighting the challenges of holding powerful men accountable.

Many accusers of the former Hollywood movie mogul condemned Thursday’s decision, with the actress Ashley Judd telling reporters it was “an act of institutional betrayal.”

You’re plastic surgery is an act of institutional betrayal, Ashley.

You had sex with Harvey to promote your career, because you are a prostitute. Harvey fulfilled his end of the bargain, and made you a star. Adults make decisions and they live with them.

Shut your deformed whore mouth.

The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg signaled it planned to retry Weinstein.

In a bitterly divided 4-3 ruling, the state Court of Appeals said the trial judge made a critical mistake by letting women testify that Weinstein assaulted them, even though their accusations were not part of the charges he faced.

The appeals court said the trial judge compounded the error by ruling that if Weinstein took the witness stand, prosecutors could question him on a wide range of “loathsome” conduct, including bullying and fits of anger toward associates.

It said the ruling had an impact on Weinstein’s decision not to testify in his own defense, undermining a fact-finding process that turned on the parties’ credibility.

“The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial,” Judge Jenny Rivera wrote for the majority.

Are you even allowed to do that?

Weinstein, 72, has been serving a 23-year sentence in a prison in upstate Rome, New York.

Jurors in Manhattan convicted him in February 2020 of sexually assaulting former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006, and raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013.

Miriam Haley

Jessica Mann

The conviction included charges of first-degree sexual assault and third-degree rape. Weinstein was acquitted on other charges.

At a press conference, Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala called the decision “a great day for America.”

True.

Aidala said Weinstein expressed relief when they spoke about the decision, which Weinstein learned about when someone at the prison handed him a piece of paper announcing the outcome.

“He just said thank you more times than I can count,” Aidala said. “He’s in a horrible place, a horrible situation, but the human spirit is strong and he’s done the best he can.”

Weinstein is not expected to be freed immediately, as he faces a separate 16-year prison term imposed last year in California after he was convicted for the 2013 rape of an actress at a Los Angeles hotel. That conviction still stands.

Yeah, that was also fake.

Just let him out.

Then put him on trial for making “Good Will Hunting” and polluting the soul of America.

]]>
UK Experts Claim Men Get Away With “Rape” by Claiming to Have “Sexsomnia” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/04/17/uk-experts-claim-men-get-away-with-rape-by-claiming-to-have-sexsomnia/ Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000

I never even thought of using the excuse that I was sleepwalking to explain away rape. Usually, when women ask me why I raped them, I just say it’s because they were wearing revealing clothing and asking for it.

But this sleep-raping is a good angle.

The Guardian:

Experts and lawyers involved in sexual offence cases in Britain have warned that suspected rapists are evading justice by claiming to have a rare sleepwalking disorder that causes them to engage in sexual activity while asleep.

They said there had “definitely” been cases where guilty people had been found not guilty, and warned of the potential for further miscarriages of justice – and harm to the public – without more robust challenges to “sexsomnia” claims put forward by defendants.

The warnings come after an investigation by the Observer uncovered a rise in the use of “sexsomnia” as part of defence cases in criminal trials. It found 80 cases over the past 30 years where defendants accused of rape, sexual assault or child sexual abuse claimed to have been sleepwalking or suffering from sexsomnia at the time.

But while there were only occasional cases in the 1990s and early 2000s, the analysis reveals at least 51 in the past decade and eight in the past year alone. The figures are likely to represent only part of the true total, with many not publicly reported. In about 60% of cases where sexsomnia was part of the defence, a not-guilty verdict was returned, the Observer’s analysis suggests. Overall, the average jury conviction rate for rape was 58% in England and Wales.

Charges against suspects have also been dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service before they even reached court after defence lawyers raised sexsomnia behind the scenes. One law firm advertised how it “kept pressure” on the CPS after it decided to continue with the prosecution of a wealthy client charged with sexual assault. The charges were dropped before the case went to trial.

Dr Neil Stanley, an independent sleep expert who has provided expert evidence in trials where sexsomnia was raised as an issue, said that while some claims of the condition were undoubtedly genuine, others were not.

“It is being used cynically,” he said. “There are cases that are in the public domain where it is clear that they’re just chancing their arm. Because, of course, if it is sexsomnia, you’re found not guilty. Judges haven’t a clue. Juries haven’t a clue. So it’s worth a try.”

Stanley said attempted use of sexsomnia by defendants had “massively skyrocketed” in recent years and that such claims were very difficult to definitively disprove – meaning often “just saying, ‘I don’t remember. It could be sexsomnia,’ is enough”.

…

Sexsomnia is recognised in the DSM-5 diagnostic manual of psychiatric conditions and is a type of para­somnia, a disorder involving abnormal sleep behaviour. Sufferers engage in sex acts while in non-REM sleep. They might have their eyes open but will have no awareness or memory of their behaviour.

If a jury decides that an accused person was in such a state – known as “automatism” – when they committed an alleged offence, they will be found not guilty. But while lab tests and partner histories can be used to try to establish whether a sexsomnia claim is genuine, sleep experts and lawyers say the system is open to abuse because uncertainty in the science means it is impossible to say for sure whether someone was or was not suffering from sexsomnia.

Many of those successfully pleading sexsomnia in court had no known history of sleepwalking and no formal diagnosis. Other cases involved defendants performing a complicated series of actions in unfamiliar settings, which experts said were less typical of genuine sexsomnia.

In about a third of the cases, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and some were very intoxicated, but sexsomnia was cited as the primary factor behind their behaviour.

…

Sexsomnia has also been used by defence teams in an attempt to discredit victims. Jade McCrossen-Nethercott, 31, from Croydon, is taking legal action against the CPS after it dropped her rape case days before it was due to go to trial after expert witnesses said she had sexsomnia.

McCrossen-Nethercott said the conclusion was made by an expert instructed by the defence who had never met her, and was based on her answers to a 15-question survey. “It was plucked out of thin air,” she said.

I am going to bring Sexsomnia to America.

I am going to become a lawyer specializing in Sexsomnia as a defense against fake rape charges, as well as real rape charges.

This one weird trick could transform the future of rape.

]]>