Judith Godrèche when she was 14.

What is the point of being rich and famous if every woman you have sex with can accuse you of raping them at any time for the rest of your life, and you will literally be arrested by cops?

The Guardian:

French authorities detained leading film directors Benoît Jacquot and Jacques Doillon on Monday for questioning over accusations of sexual abuse, sources close to the case said.

Jacques Doillon and Benoît Jacquot.

Actor and director Judith Godrèche, 52, has formally accused Jacquot of rape and Doillon of sexual assault when she was a minor, accusations both men deny. She has described Jacquot of having an unhealthy “hold” over her during a relationship that started when she was 14, and lasted from 1986 to 1992. She has accused Doillon of abuse on set when she acted in one of his films.

Jeez, man.

Can you imagine raping someone for six years?

I don’t care how hot the bitch is, I’d get worn out.

Judith Godrèche and Benoît Jacquot during the tortuous, years-long rape spree.

To be clear, she was literally living with this guy and appearing in public with him.

Lawyers for Jacquot and Doillon said it was not necessary to detain the men while they were being questioned, and stressed that they should be considered innocent until proven guilty. Jacquot’s lawyer, Julia Minkowski, said her client would “finally be able to express himself before the law”. Doillon’s attorney, Marie Dose, said no legal criteria could justify his being detained for questioning “36 years” after the incident alleged by Godrèche. The sources close to the case said their interrogation could include a confrontation with the person or persons accusing them.

This is leaning into the modern idea that there was a big problem with the age gap because of Marxist “power dynamics” theory.

But they’re also doing the Weinstein thing that there were power dynamics because he was rich.

Just how helpless are women? They lose the ability to control their own physical actions around rich older men?

If they really have that kind of weakness, should we really be claiming that they are powerful and putting them in positions of power?

Based on this theory, if there was a woman president, a man who was richer and older than her could come and force her to do things by using his power dynamics.

What if the rich older man was Russian?

He could force a woman president to play straight out of the Kremlin handbook.

The House ethics committee is continuing to probe allegations that Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz “engaged in sexual misconduct and illicit drug use” and that he “sought to obstruct government investigations of his conduct.”@rachelvscott has more exclusive details. pic.twitter.com/kncba0lVdG

— Good Morning America (@GMA) June 19, 2024

Thomas Massie is the only Congressman who actually represents what I believe.

However, Matt Gaetz would be the second closest.

Having two Congressmen who maybe sort of represent the America people is not actually a threat to the government (and if anything, it makes it seem more legitimate than it actually is), but the Jews are obsessed with having zero legitimate Congressmen.

So, you get rape hoaxed.

The Guardian:

A bipartisan Capitol Hill committee is investigating Matt Gaetz, the far-right Republican congressman and vocal Donald Trump supporter, over longstanding allegations of sexual misconduct, illicit drug use and other alleged ethical breaches, it said on Tuesday.

The announcement by the House ethics committee – which contains an equal number of Democrats and Republicans – reignited a swirl of scandal surrounding the outspoken Trump ally that had abated somewhat after an earlier criminal investigation into allegations against him was dropped.

In a statement, the committee said it had spoken to dozens of witnesses, issued 25 subpoenas, and reviewed thousands of pages of documents as part of its long-running investigation into Gaetz’s conduct, which was initially opened in April 2021.

Source

As a result of that review, the committee said, certain allegations deserved further examination.

“The committee is reviewing allegations … that Representative Gaetz may have: engaged in sexual misconduct and illicit drug use, accepted improper gifts, dispensed special privileges and favours to individuals with whom he had a personal relationship, and sought to obstruct government investigations of his conduct,” it said.

The committee said other allegations made against Gaetz – specifically those of sharing inappropriate images or videos on the House floor, misusing state identification records, improper personal use of campaign funds and accepting a bribe – were no longer being investigated.

The committee’s statement came a day after Gaetz issued what appeared to be a pre-emptive post on X in which he accused it of pursuing “frivolous investigations” into him and compared its tactics to the Soviet Union.

This whole concept of “House ethics” is dumb and illegal.

If Gaetz committed crimes, he should be charged with crimes. Instead, there are no criminal charges, but an “ethics investigation.”

People voted for him. He’s an elected government official. Even if his ethics are very low, that is not relevant to anything.

The House Ethics Committee has closed four probes into me, which emerged from lies intended solely to smear me. Instead of working with me to ban Congressional stock trading, the Ethics Committee is now opening new frivolous investigations. They are doing this to avoid the…

— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) June 17, 2024

David Copperfield with contestants from the 1991 Look of the Year event in New York City.

This Guardian article is super-long.

Here’s the tl;dr of the allegations:

• He called a 15-year-old woman and asked her what she was wearing.
• He grabbed a 15-year-old woman around the waist while posing for photos during a boat party.
• He spoke to the mother of one of the teens and came off as “creepy.”
• Someone saw him flirting with a teenage girl.
• Variations of the above.
• He took a 17-year-old woman to a bar, drugged her and did something she can’t remember because she blacked out.

The Guardian:

It was September 1991 in New York and the grand finale of Look of the Year, a prestigious modeling contest that had helped launch the careers of supermodels Cindy Crawford and Helena Christensen.

The celebrity magician David Copperfield, one of the judges, watched from the front row as 58 contestants paraded across the runway in their branded hot pink and sorbet yellow swimsuits. Nearly all the contestants were teenagers; some were as young as 14.

Today, more than three decades later, five former contestants say that they were subjected to behavior by Copperfield that they now regard as inappropriate or worse. The women – who were all teenagers at the time – met him at the New York contest in 1991 or three years earlier in Japan, when he was also a judge. Others who attended the events also say they witnessed Copperfield behaving inappropriately towards the girls.

Unfortunately for women, 14 is peak sexual attractiveness for women.

Fortunately for men, 50 is peak sexual attractiveness for men.

The claims include allegations of unwanted sexual touching and sexual harassment. In one case, a former contestant alleges she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Copperfield in the months after the competition. She was 17 years old at the time, she says.

The claims follow a report in yesterday’s Guardian US, which detailed allegations of sexual misconduct and inappropriate behavior by Copperfield from women who had met him in connection with his performances. There was also an allegation of drugging in that story: one woman told the Guardian that she believes she and a friend were drugged by Copperfield before he had sexual relations with them, leaving them unable to consent.

In written responses to questions from the Guardian, lawyers for David Copperfield denied all the allegations of misconduct and inappropriate behavior. Copperfield’s lawyers said he has “never, ever acted inappropriately with anyone, let alone anyone underage”.

I’m not even a big fan of David Copperfield. In fact, I’m not a fan at all.

I think Brittany Spears was a better Vegas act.

But come on.

He’s not accused of rape.

He’s accused of flirting. These metoo allegations are just getting dumber as they run out of better allegations.

What Weinstein’s lawyer actually means is, this is a great day for misogynists who believe women lie about rape, and a very dark day for survivors and the justice system. pic.twitter.com/E778ZURXrh

— Dr Charlotte Proudman (@DrProudman) April 25, 2024

See: Consent Theory on Steroids: Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to TWENTY-THREE YEARS IN PRISON

Well, we didn’t expect this.

Apparently, the Harvey Weinstein conviction, based exclusively on one of his girlfriends claiming that at some point in their relationship, they had sex when she didn’t really feel like it. (She had sex with him both before and after the alleged events, but one time, it wasn’t “consensual.”)

This is a massive win for all men.

No one likes Harvey Weinstein, but he didn’t “rape” anyone, and what this ruling did was make it so all forms of normal heterosexual sex could be relabeled “rape,” and men could face decades in prison based on a completely fake crime for which there was no evidence.

Reuters:

Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for sexual assault and rape was overturned by New York’s highest court, reopening the landmark case that fueled the #MeToo movement and highlighting the challenges of holding powerful men accountable.

Many accusers of the former Hollywood movie mogul condemned Thursday’s decision, with the actress Ashley Judd telling reporters it was “an act of institutional betrayal.”

You’re plastic surgery is an act of institutional betrayal, Ashley.

You had sex with Harvey to promote your career, because you are a prostitute. Harvey fulfilled his end of the bargain, and made you a star. Adults make decisions and they live with them.

Shut your deformed whore mouth.

The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg signaled it planned to retry Weinstein.

In a bitterly divided 4-3 ruling, the state Court of Appeals said the trial judge made a critical mistake by letting women testify that Weinstein assaulted them, even though their accusations were not part of the charges he faced.

The appeals court said the trial judge compounded the error by ruling that if Weinstein took the witness stand, prosecutors could question him on a wide range of “loathsome” conduct, including bullying and fits of anger toward associates.

It said the ruling had an impact on Weinstein’s decision not to testify in his own defense, undermining a fact-finding process that turned on the parties’ credibility.

“The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial,” Judge Jenny Rivera wrote for the majority.

Are you even allowed to do that?

Weinstein, 72, has been serving a 23-year sentence in a prison in upstate Rome, New York.

Jurors in Manhattan convicted him in February 2020 of sexually assaulting former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006, and raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013.

Miriam Haley

Jessica Mann

The conviction included charges of first-degree sexual assault and third-degree rape. Weinstein was acquitted on other charges.

At a press conference, Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala called the decision “a great day for America.”

True.

Aidala said Weinstein expressed relief when they spoke about the decision, which Weinstein learned about when someone at the prison handed him a piece of paper announcing the outcome.

“He just said thank you more times than I can count,” Aidala said. “He’s in a horrible place, a horrible situation, but the human spirit is strong and he’s done the best he can.”

Weinstein is not expected to be freed immediately, as he faces a separate 16-year prison term imposed last year in California after he was convicted for the 2013 rape of an actress at a Los Angeles hotel. That conviction still stands.

Yeah, that was also fake.

Just let him out.

Then put him on trial for making “Good Will Hunting” and polluting the soul of America.

NOW: Harvey Weinstein’s legal team holds a press conference after his 2020 rape conviction was overturned by the New York Court of Appeals earlier today

An anti-Trump protester, after learning the press conference was about Weinstein, held up a sign reading “is a pig” pic.twitter.com/rOh8OdrFom

— katie smith (@probablyreadit) April 25, 2024

This is the same story with Harvey Weinstein. He had love letters from that bitch. She also admitted she had “consensual” sex with him both before and after the “unconsensual” sex she accused him of.

All of this “oh yeah, I just remembered that guy raped me decades ago” stuff is obviously bullshit. It’s actually cartoonish.

What sort of person takes this seriously?

Further: if this whore was shit on, who says that in public? Like, I assume her father is still alive. He’s reading the news, like, eye-bulging, “my daughter says the WWF guy shit on her…?! And she’s telling everyone this…?!”

New York Post:

A woman who alleges she was sexually abused for years by Vince McMahon wrote a gushing love letter to the former WWE CEO in which she declared the duo was “in love with a capital L” — and she now claims that McMahon coerced her to do it, The Post has learned.

Janel Grant — whose bombshell lawsuit landed a day before the wrestling icon abruptly stepped down as executive chairman of WWE-parent TKO Group Holdings — penned a lengthy email to McMahon dated Dec. 24, 2021 in which she called him “my best friend, my love and my everything.”

Huh.

“After almost 3 years together, it’ like my life isn’t even real to me unless you’re there and in it and I’m sharing it all with you,” Grant, 43, wrote in the Christmas Eve letter to 78-year-old McMahon obtained by The Post.

The lovestruck letter stands in contrast to the allegations in her explosive lawsuit filed in Connecticut federal court in January, which claimed that McMahon allegedly defecated on Grant’s head during a threesome in May 2020 — some 18 months before she wrote the alleged love letter.

Which is worse:

• She’s lying about being shit on?
• Or she wrote that gushing love letter to a man who shit on her?

Both are very possible.

But Grant’s attorney, Ann Callis, told The Post that McMahon actually instructed Grant to write the note.

This is the proof of that:

But she really wants him to have a nice letter, even in that proof.

Women are so disgusting.

They just have to be removed from society. There is no other option.

We cannot have this.

🇬🇧🇷🇴 Andrew Tate explains why the 2012 case against him was closed, and why it’s being brought back up. pic.twitter.com/HYypf2fQo4

— Censored Men (@CensoredMen) March 12, 2024

We’ve seen right-wingers say Andrew Tate was making porn and admitted to a bunch of wire fraud crimes on video. That is true.

However, that’s not what he is getting charged with. And it’s not why he’s being charged.

Say whatever you want about Tate (there is a lot to say, actually), but this is a political persecution.

The Guardian:

British police investigating allegations of rape and human trafficking have been granted a warrant to extradite Andrew Tate to the UK.

Bedfordshire police said they had been granted the warrant by authorities in Romania, but would have to wait until proceedings there on allegations of sexual violence and trafficking, which Tate denies, are completed.

Tate, 37, a controversial social media influencer accused of anti-women views, was detained in Romania on Monday after the arrest warrant was issued.

He and his brother Tristan, 35, face charges in the UK including “sexual aggression” dating to 2012-15, according to a statement by his public relations representative.

Wait, “sexual aggression” is a criminal charge?

“No, he didn’t rape me, or even ‘sexually assault’ me, but he was for sure sexually aggressive.”

Wew lads.

Bedfordshire police said in a statement: “As part of an ongoing investigation into allegations of rape and human trafficking, Bedfordshire police has obtained a European arrest warrant for two men in their 30s.

“We are working with authorities in Romania as part of this investigation and will provide an update in due course.”

It said its investigation was called Operation Moonwalk and asked “anyone with information about this specific investigation” to contact them.

Pretty awesome the case codename is “Operation Moonwalk.”

These rape charges are as fake as the Moonwalk.

(Zing.)

The Tate brothers were charged with rape, human trafficking and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women in a separate case in Romania after being arrested in the country’s capital in December 2022 alongside two Romanian women. All four deny the allegations.

The allegations from Britain led to their renewed detention in Romania and the extradition request went before a court in Bucharest on Tuesday. The Romanian court of appeal said in a statement that it “rules to execute the arrest warrant and … to postpone handing over the requested person until the final verdict in the criminal case argued at the Bucharest court”.

After the latest court hearing in Bucharest, the Tate brothers were released from custody and both deny the allegations against them in the UK.

The ultimate lesson here is: if you’re going to be going viral pissing power people off, don’t be within the jurisdiction of powerful people you’re pissing off.

Also, don’t run camgirl scams and then brag about it on video if you’re planning to bring down the Illuminati with viral TikToks.

I thought porn made people less sexual in real life?

Remember when they were telling college guys to jack off before they go to parties so they wouldn’t be driven to rape? They admitted masturbation lowers testosterone, and said it was better for young men to masturbate before being around women.

Now masturbation makes men sexually violent?

It’s almost like the society will do everything to attack boys and men – they’ll just float any excuse at all.

The Guardian:

Boys are watching violent porn on their smartphones then going on to attack girls, police have said, as new data showed children are now the biggest perpetrators of sexual abuse against other children.

Police data shows there has been a quadrupling of sexual offences against children, in what officers say is the most authoritative analysis of offending against youngsters.

The report from the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) said the offending by adults against children was usually more serious, but said they were alarmed by the growth of sexual offending by those aged 17 or under.

In one case a child of four was referred to police after allegedly using a smartphone to upload an indecent image of a sibling. Police declined to give any more details.

Okay, well.

I don’t even believe that happened.

In 2022 a total of 107,000 reports were made to police in England and Wales alleging sexual offences against children, ranging from rapes and, in a quarter of cases, to the making and sharing of indecent images.

The NPCC said 52% of alleged offenders were children, compared with around one third a decade ago.

Police received reports of 14,800 rapes and sexual assaults against children aged 10 to 17 where the suspect was classed as a child, the overwhelming majority being boys.

Ian Critchley, the NPCC lead for child protection, said: “This is predominantly a gender-based crime of boys committing offences against girls.

wait a minute 😳 pic.twitter.com/dvswW8OEJb

— non aesthetic things (@PicturesFoIder) January 1, 2024

Critchley said the clear-up rate – where someone is charged or cautioned – was 12% where a child is physically attacked and 11% for indecent images offences. The clear-up rate for child-on-child attacks is 15% for sexual assault and 12% for rape.

He said offences involving AI were already being reported to police. These include “nudification” where the photo of a person – usually female – is digitally stripped of clothing to make it appear as if they are naked.

Oh, so men are collaborating with AI to abuse the innocent princesses, huh?

Imagine my shock.

It’s not clear why pornography is legal at all. But this is just a total attack on men, and an attack on AI.

Great from the Earl of Leicester speaking about the proliferation of violent pornography, danger of smartphones and inappropriate sexual explicit RSE in schools pic.twitter.com/saFsw2A3Nn

— Family Education Trust (@FamEdTrust) December 7, 2023

The following social media companies could face jail time or a fine of 10% revenue if they don’t remove all promotion and affiliate links for The Real World:@TeamYouTube @TikTokSupport @instagram @rumblevideo @Reddit

Please share and warn these companies! pic.twitter.com/RBe9uXV9p8

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

pic.twitter.com/FsC6OYdoBE

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

This six year old boy is being used to lure older children into the possible pyramid scheme pic.twitter.com/LmKUboZ4Br

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

A common theme is encouraging boys to quit their education to join The Real World and “break free from The Matrix” pic.twitter.com/YDCaObpRUZ

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

Some more “wins” pic.twitter.com/Az7mowjmyF

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

“School age boys 12 – 18”.

This program is exactly the sort of thing your online safety bill was created for. Urgent action is required!! pic.twitter.com/60VrylzikL

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

To be fair, Andrew Tate is a bad role model. He shouldn’t be censored, because no one should be censored. And obviously I agree with a lot of what he says (though the parts I agree with are all very basic).

He’s a better role model than anyone else who’s not already totally banned, I guess. At least he says women are retarded and men should have money. But he says that in the worst way, and his political stuff is very basic.

Dude is just super basic.

He’s telling guys to get rich and drive Bugattis so they can get laid. His entire schtick is that the purpose of being a man is to impress women.

And how does he advise you to get rich? By running camwhore and crypto scams.

He was a professional athlete who started a brutal camwhore business, then got into crypto scammery. I don’t really think this is a path that most people watching him could follow, even if they thought it was a good idea. And the purpose of the whole thing is to… get access to that disgusting, stinky, gooey hole that women have between their fatty ham legs.

It’s stupid. The whole thing is stupid. Just as a social phenomenon, Andrew Tate is very ridiculous, and it shows just how broken the society is that this is what young men turn to.

Look at this:

If you truly wanted money, you wouldn’t be able to sleep until you fucking had it.

— Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) August 8, 2023

Thank God I’m not working for money because I’m busy working on spending it.

FEW. pic.twitter.com/1JKMndxvDO

— Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) June 16, 2023

Think of all of the amazing things you could have accomplished by now if you weren’t brutally lazy.

Imagine all of the time you wasted, every opportunity you let pass by, all the good advice you arrogantly ignored.

If you were your God the creator, would you not be…

— Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) July 23, 2023

(does flaunting money and luxury sound like things that would make God happy?)

A real man is ultra rich and provides his woman with the most expensive things money can buy.

— Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) July 22, 2023

It’s materialism.

I’m the number one guy saying “men should have money.” I think it should basically be the center of your life. If we looked at it like life is a video game, getting money would be “core gameplay.” But materialism is feminine. And this guy is in no position to talk about money, since he made it in the scummiest ways imaginable.

Now, check this:

My girl loves to watch the money come through.

— Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) June 11, 2023

“Mommy thinks I’m a good little boy.” Literally.

Breh.

You want the money for power. You don’t want it for bobbles, and you definitely don’t want it for women’s approval. Those are the two worst reasons to want money (though the latter is significantly worse than the former) coming from the guy who got money in the worst ways imaginable.

He would be cooler if he was a bank robber and a literal rapist. Even if you didn’t endorse bank robbery and literal rape, you’d at least have to be like “yeah, dude’s hardcore and he’s ride or die and very classy.”

He could be like “nigga, u mad?” and I’d be like “yeah, them niggas mad.”

But no. He made money from pornography and then did lovey-dovey with gutter sluts. And honestly, if someone does that, then okay. But he did it, then went out and told other people to do it, like “yeah, this is really a good way to live your life, guys.”

I have to also say: censorship is a big part of this. People saw what happened to me, and this no doubt killed in the cradle a bunch of men who would have otherwise devoted their lives to being “life coach” type role models for young men. So because of censorship and the government/media life-ruining people who say anything politically incorrect, instead of healthy role models demonstrating masculinity, you get a guy who doesn’t really have anything to lose.

The Guardian:

Apple has withdrawn an app created by Andrew Tate after accusations that it encouraged misogyny and could be an illegal pyramid scheme.

Tate created the app, Real World Portal, after the closure of his “Hustler’s University”, which was an online academy for his fans, promising to assist them in making thousands of pounds while helping Tate’s videos on social media, which have been described as misogynistic, to go viral.

McCue Jury & Partners, the firm representing four British women who have accused Tate of sexual and physical assault, claimed that the app deliberately targets young men and encourages misogyny, including members of the app sharing techniques on how to control and exploit women. The firm has also claimed that there is evidence to suggest that the app is an illegal pyramid scheme, with members being charged $49.99 a month to join.

That sounds like price-gouging, not a pyramid scheme. You’re allowed to charge for an app.

But yeah, I guess if he’s paying people out through the app for spreading his videos, then it is kind of like a pyramid scheme.

Honestly, telling people they would get rich by spamming his videos is by far the funniest thing Tate ever did.

Last week, the Real World Portal app was removed from Google’s Play store after claims that it was an illegal pyramid scheme and encouraged misogyny.

On Friday night Apple also said it had removed it from its app store. It followed a letter from the legal firm asking Apple to consider whether the app was in line with its policies and whether the company was exposing itself to any corporate liability in hosting it on its platform.

Part of the letter, dated 15 September, said: “We are writing because our clients are extremely concerned that you are hosting Tate’s Real World Portal (RWP) mobile application on your Apple Store … In continuing to host RWP, not only is Apple potentially indirectly financing Tate’s alleged criminal activities but is aiding the spread of his misogynistic teachings.”

Okay, well.

Okay.

This seems a bit similar to the Russell Brand situation, where the government is telling people to ban him.

Related: Rumble Refuses to Demonetize Russell Brand Following UK Government’s Letter

But it’s hard to look at this as though something of value was lost. I don’t really see anywhere good this can go.

Russell Brand, on the other hand, is actually helping take things in a good direction. Just as a general matter. He doesn’t talk about Jews, but his materials are on point (insofar as you can be on point without talking about the Jews).

Tate said he was “breaking out of the Matrix,” then said to do scams to get rich so women will give you attention. That is literally the Matrix. The Matrix is believing your value as a man is dependent on what women think of you.

The real alpha move would be to get rich and then use your money to kill women and get away with it.

No, no, just joking. Don’t do that.

The real alpha move is to get rich and not buy a Bugatti (buy like, an F-150 Raptor), and then get a teenage bride and not let her leave the house, and then barely ever see her and don’t think about women at all.

Julia blasts YouTube for the “outrageous” suspension of the monetisation on Russell Brand’s channel.

“It’s not YouTube’s job to sit as judge and jury on Russell Brand! They’ve got no right to get involved in this.”@JuliaHB1 | @Tom_Slater_ pic.twitter.com/mtrRMhVgzE

— TalkTV (@TalkTV) September 19, 2023

Previously: All Broadcasters Investigating Russell Brand

It’s surprising YouTube didn’t just ban him outright.

They’ve been waiting to do that.

The Guardian:

YouTube has suspended Russell Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform following allegations of rape and sexual assault in a massive hit to his finances.

The video-sharing and social media site said it had suspended Brand’s channel from the YouTube partner programme after serious allegations against him, meaning his videos are no longer able to be monetised on the platform.

The 48-year-old comedian and actor has been accused of rape, assault and emotional abuse between 2006 and 2013, when he was at the height of his fame working for the BBC, Channel 4 and starring in Hollywood films. He denies the allegations, saying all his relationships were consensual.

The Met police said on Monday they had received an allegation of sexual assault in Soho, central London, in 2003. The force added that as yet no investigation had been launched.

Suspending Brand’s ability to earn money from his YouTube channel is a major blow to the comedian’s finances. YouTube pays creators a cut of the money it earns from showing adverts next to their videos, which can be a highly lucrative business.

Brand had prepared for this eventuality by moving many of his videos across to rival site Rumble, although this a relatively niche outlet that does not give Brand access to the 6.5 million subscribers he has built up during a decade on YouTube.

Although Brand no longer works for mainstream media outlets, his alternative media empire still relies on several online platforms such as YouTube that host his content and process payments. Brand’s book publisher has already said it will pause future projects with the performer.

A spokesperson for YouTube said: “We have suspended monetisation on Russell Brand’s channel for violating our creator responsibility policy. If a creator’s off-platform behaviour harms our users, employees or ecosystem, we take action to protect the community.”

Industry experts have estimated Brand probably makes between £2,000 to £4,000 a video, which,, based on five videos a week, could produce close to £1m a year.

Not sure when allegations – without any criminal charges – became the standard for punishing people.

I guess that change took place sometime in mid-2020. Maybe we’re just noticing it now.

JUST IN: YouTube has suspended monetisation Russell Brand’s channel — BBC

Guilty until proven innocent.

pic.twitter.com/H9wYMScUGB

— Radar🚨 (@RadarHits) September 19, 2023

It’s strange, because now anyone who doesn’t like someone can destroy their life by accusing him of something.

This is happening pic.twitter.com/N8zIKLbJN2

— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) September 15, 2023

I don’t know if you guys know this, but Russell Brand’s show on Rumble is actually really good.

It’s pretty much on the same level as Tucker Carlson, maybe a bit better, in terms of the quality of the ideas. The difference is, he is very funny.

Also, he’s better than Tucker Carlson, because he says the aliens agenda is a CIA operation. He was promoting it a lot, probably because he wants to believe, but last month he came out and said he thinks the whole thing is a scam by the Pentagon and gave all my talking points about how every piece of “video evidence” comes from the US government. Tucker Carlson is still claiming aliens are real, and is really pushing it hard.

Russell Brand also never went on a campaign against Nick Fuentes like Tucker did.

But in general, I would say it’s in that range. Talk about the vax, talk about the election hoax (which Tucker didn’t do until much later), talk about the Ukraine hoax (Tucker promotes war with China, which Brand doesn’t do), and so on. No talk about Jews or anything really hardcore (even though the Jew thing is kind of getting less hardcore now, in a general sense, Rumble isn’t going to do a contract with someone who talks about it aggressively – though Rumble does allow Nick and others to stream on the site).

The difference between this and every other moderate conservative news show, in my opinion, is that Brand’s show is actually really fun to watch, because he’s witty. He’s also very effeminate – or at the very least “flamboyant” – which might bother some people. It doesn’t really bother me, given the context that he’s a professional comedian.

This is the link to his Rumble channel, for anyone who was going to have a hard time figuring that out (trust me, you’d be shocked by the “can you please Google that for me?” emails I’ve gotten over the years).

His show appears to be one of the most popular on Rumble now. He’s also one of the main people leading an exodus from YouTube. He starts his show on YouTube, and does the first 15 minutes there, then says “we’re going to be moving now to Rumble exclusively, because we’re going to be saying some things that YouTube doesn’t allow us to say.” Several of the major Rumble broadcasters do this, so it’s not his idea but something that’s probably part of his contract, but it’s working. Once you get to Rumble, you’re like “oh wow, this is just like YouTube was in 2016!”

I’ve previously mused that Rumble is likely to siphon off a certain amount of YouTube’s viewers by allowing total free speech, and then start banning people from talking about Jews. But hey – they haven’t done that yet. Right now, Rumble is the only real free speech platform. I honestly think I would be allowed to stream there. I’ve been thinking of trying.

Anyway, all of this is to say – I’m not the least bit surprised he’s getting metoo’d. He says in the above video addressing the issue that political enemies went through all the women he’d had sex with over the years – which he admits was a lot (for those who don’t know, he used to be a Hollywood actor and was briefly married to Katy Perry) – to find someone willing to accuse him.

It’s obviously political, though it is also terrifying.

The Times (Of London):

Four women have alleged sexual assaults between 2006 and 2013, while he was a presenter for BBC Radio 2 and Channel 4 and then an actor in Hollywood films. Others have made a range of accusations about Brand’s controlling, abusive and predatory behaviour.

…

The findings come from a joint investigation by The Sunday Times, The Times and Channel 4 Dispatches.

One woman alleges that Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, according to medical records. Text messages show that in the hours after leaving his house, she told Brand that she had been scared by him and felt taken advantage of, adding: “When a girl say[s] NO it means no.” Brand replied saying he was “very sorry”.

A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was 31 and she was 16 and still at school. She said he referred to her as “the child” during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship that lasted for about three months, and that Brand once “forced his penis down her throat”, making her choke. She says she tried to push him off and said she had to punch him in the stomach to make him stop.

A third woman claims that he sexually assaulted her while she worked with him in Los Angeles, and that he threatened to take legal action if she told anyone else about her allegation.

The fourth described being sexually assaulted by Brand and him being physically and emotionally abusive towards her.

All said they felt ready to speak only after being approached by reporters. Several said they felt compelled to do so given Brand’s newfound prominence as an online wellness influencer, with millions of followers on YouTube and other sites.

The others have accused him of physical and emotional abuse, sexual harassment and bullying.

This is going to be a problem.

As we all witnessed this month, the actor Danny Masterson was sentenced to life in prison for “rapes” that allegedly occurred twenty years ago.

See: “That 70s Show” Actor Sentenced to 30-to-Life for “Rape” That Allegedly Occurred 20 Years Ago

The Masterson case was even more extreme than the Weinstein case, in basically every way. So it appears that these rape hoaxes are just heating up, and you’re going to see them go totally buckwild presently.

Understand: it is now established precedent that if you believe a crying woman on a witness stand, then your belief amounts to “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” The only other crime in all of legal history, going back to Ancient Rome, where people were convicted without any physical evidence, without anything other than eyewitness testimony, was the Holocaust.

At the time of the Nuremberg Trials, legal scholars were flipping out, saying that the process had destroyed the entire Western legal system. However, that “Nuremberg Standard” was never applied in the normal legal system – until the conviction of Harvey Weinstein.

Since Weinstein’s conviction, prosecutors have gone totally nuts bringing rape charges they never would have brought before the Weinstein conviction. Masterson was the first big post-Harvey celebrity conviction, but there are definitely going to be more of these.

Right now, it’s just a news report, but that’s the way these always start.

If they actually have record of a girl going to a rape center, that is way more than they had on Weinstein or Masterson. One of the girls being 16 also creates serious problems, because even though it’s not illegal to have sex with a 16-year-old, there are all of these other laws around that. It’s unlikely he didn’t share drugs and alcohol with her, for example. And she’s just going to get more sympathy, because “I was only a child and you took advantage of my innocence!”

Also, they didn’t have text messages in the Weinstein or Masterson cases. Well, they had some in the Weinstein case, but they were exculpatory (the supposed victim sending him “I love you and miss you so much” messages days after the supposed “rape”). If he’s apologizing to her in texts in a way that seems to imply admission of guilt, that is really bad.

I think a lot of people still haven’t processed the Weinstein-Masterson precedent. This is a serious situation. It wouldn’t have been when it supposedly happened (2006-2013), but right now, this is “deported to America to go to prison forever” type material.

I said when Weinstein was sentenced: “They are going to start using this politically, because under this standard, any man who has ever had sex with a woman can be convicted of rape.”

If I were Russell, I would have been on a plane to Russia before the story was published, quite frankly.

No joke. I know some of you reading know him. I don’t have his number and I don’t even know if he reads this site, but 1000%, he needs to gtfo of any jurisdiction within reach of the Americans. He’s got the money to set himself up nicely in Saint Petersburg with his family. I mean at the very least, he should go there now and see what they end up charging him with. Some people don’t have the luxury of fleeing to Russia (I famously announced after January 6 – before anyone was charged – that everyone who was there should go to Russia immediately – we see how that worked out for all of them).

The important thing is to go before the charges. In fact, I don’t even know if I would be allowed to write “he should go to Russia” if the charges had already been filed, as that could be some kind of “abetting.” If he goes before the charges are filed, his lawyers can just say “Russell decided to move to Russia because he needed access to more authentic borsch.”

He’s not going to lose any fans by fleeing to Russia. It will be an adventure. He can do a lot of fun stuff with his show. He could probably start interviewing top Russian politicians and cultural figures, and become an honored guest.

Anyway – nobody ever listens to me.

But I want it on record: I am saying right now, on the release of these allegations, that Russell Brand should immediately move to Russia (or China or Venezuela or whichever other non-aligned state – Russia seems the most obvious because it’s basically just like America or Britain in the 1970s and you can learn the language without too much trouble).