fact checkers – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png fact checkers – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Facebook Abolishing Fact-Checkers Will Cause International Crisis, Experts Claim https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/10/facebook-abolishing-fact-checkers-will-cause-international-crisis-experts-claim/ Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000
“It’s cool, bro, just chill” is the official guiding principle of Neo-Facebook

Previously: Zuckerberg has a Golden Opportunity to Rebrand His Twitter Clone as “The Free Speech Alternative to Twitter”

There could only be a showdown with Facebook if the US government allowed Europe to have such a showdown. Europe does not have independent policies, all of them are dictated to them by the United States. Obviously, they have stricter speech rules than the US (at least technically), but those rules are all driven by the US desire to shut down speech globally.

Just look at the way the Germans have gone along with supporting Ukraine terrorism against their country, gone along with collapsing their own industrial sector, because the US tells them to do that. It’s ridiculous and humiliating.

However, US organs at the State Department probably do not agree with Donald Trump easing the restrictions on speech rules in America, and they will likely use European bodies to attack those changes.

The Guardian:

Sweeping changes to the policing of Meta’s social media platforms have set the tech company on a collision course with legislators in the UK and the European Union, experts and political figures have said.

Lawmakers in Brussels and London criticised Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to scrap factcheckers in the US for Facebook, Instagram and Threads, with one labelling it “quite frightening”.

The changes to Meta’s global policies on hateful content now include allowing users to call transgender people “it”, with the guidelines stating: “We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation.”

Chi Onwurah, the Labour MP and chair of the science and technology committee for the House of Commons, which is investigating how online disinformation fuelled last summer’s riots, said Zuckerberg’s decision to replace professional factcheckers with users policing the accuracy of posts was “concerning” and “quite frightening”.

“To hear that Meta is removing all its factcheckers [in the US] is concerning … people have a right to be protected from the harmful effects of misinformation,” she said. “The fact that Zuckerberg said he’s following the example of X must raise concerns when we compare how X is a platform for misinformation to a greater extent than Facebook has been.”

Chi Onwurah is frightened.

She’s one of the top British people, you know.

People better take her emotions seriously.

Meta’s move, which Zuckerberg made clear was a response to the incoming Donald Trump presidency, also prompted predictions that a major challenge is coming from the Trump administration against laws such as the Online Safety Act.

The former UK technology minister, Damian Collins, said such a challenge will “most likely be made through trade negotiations where pressure will be brought against the UK to accept American standards for digital regulation”.

…

A Meta whistleblower told the Guardian: “I am extremely concerned about what this means for teenagers.”

Teenagers are useless anyway.

Who cares what happens to them?

Arturo Béjar, a former senior engineer whose responsibilities at Meta included child safety measures, said: “They will be increasingly exposed to all the content categories that they need to be protected against.”

Harmful content, including violent or pornographic material, could reach young users more easily, Bejar said, citing Zuckerberg’s statement that tackling “lower severity” transgressions will now rely on users flagging content before Meta acts on it.

…

Zuckerberg has said his policy of ditching factcheckers applies only in the US for now, but his broadside against Europe has raised concerns that he is planning to roll out the approach in Europe.

It’s very expensive for these companies to do all of this censorship, which I think is why they’re all excited to stop doing it. With Twitter, it was something like 75% of employees at the company were working in the censorship department.

It’s all ridiculous, and hopefully we’re getting to the point where we can ask about personal responsibility, and start asking if it is possible for the government to view people as adults who are capable of making their own decisions.

Obviously, the idea that the government would view its citizens as adults capable of making decisions is far outside of established norms in the current year, with the government having moved to treat everyone like a little baby. Clearly, everyone in the government prefers to have strict policies that allow them to control what people think and do.

]]> Wikipedia Biased Against Russia to the Point of Deleting Articles About Achievements, Former Editor Reveals https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/04/06/wikipedia-biased-against-russia-to-the-point-of-deleting-articles-about-achievements-former-editor-reveals/ Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Wikipedia is a helpful website.

The problem is that they are trying to replace all other information.

And they are very biased.

RT:

Wikipedia has become “increasingly anti-Russian” during the past decade and its policy has worsened substantially since the start of the conflict in Ukraine a year ago, a former editor at the Russian-language version of the online encyclopedia has claimed.

“Participants with pro-Russian views were blocked, articles about Russian achievements were deleted,” from the platform over the past nine years, Arseny Natapov told the BRIEF channel on Telegram on Tuesday.

In 2014, a violent coup in the Ukrainian capital Kiev led to Crimea’s reunification with Russia and the outbreak of conflict in Donbass. This provoked a spike in tensions between Moscow and the West, which imposed sanctions on Russia and intensified Western military buildups near its borders.

Soon, these tensions were reflected online and Wikipedia was believed to have adopted an anti-Russia posture, and this, the former editor pointed out, deteriorated even further in late 2021, shortly before the launch of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine.

…

For a long time the reins at the Russian Wikipedia were in the hands of editors that held pro-Russian views but now they’ve been pushed out by “pro-Western and liberal members,” he said.

It’s probably a myth that the writers of history in history were more devoted to the truth.

Probably, this degree of bias is the norm, and that’s how we ended up with bullshit like “the Holocaust.”

]]> Reuters Fact-Checkers Lie About Vax Regret Article https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/01/25/reuters-fact-checkers-lie-about-vax-regret-article/ Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000

HA! pic.twitter.com/R5BiHncASb

— Andrew Anglin (@WorldWarWang) January 25, 2023

A screenshot from an article on IQfy expressing vax regret has gone viral, and the “fact-checkers” at Reuters have lied about it, constructing an elaborate hoax.

The article is entitled “They knew: why didn’t the unvaccinated do more to warn us?”

The article might be satire. It does not read like satire.

They even disabled comments on the post, saying there were too many trolls posting.

That could be part of the joke, I guess. But it’s very elaborate.

I have never heard of IQfy.com. A brief look at the site shows that it is not all satire, but this article could be satirical.

Regardless, even if it is intended as satire, Reuters “fact-checkers” openly lied about the post. Someone created and distributed a fake screenshot of an article with the same title and header image for “The Conversation.” Reuters then covered this, and claimed that the article was fake.

Reuters writes:

A screenshot purporting to show a future headline for an article published by The Conversation asks why the “unvaccinated did not do more to warn” people who were inoculated with a COVID-19 vaccine, but it is fabricated.

The Conversation is a website that publishes articles written by academics and edited by journalists. The publication’s logo is visible at the top left corner of the fake screenshot, with a headline that reads: “THEY KNEW: Why didn’t the unvaccinated do more to warn us?”

The circulated screenshot is dated June 6, 2023, five months in the future at the time of this writing.

In the image, a cover graphic features cartoon figures, with two in medical attire holding vaccines while the other two figures can be seen holding hands toward the medical personnel in a gesture of rejection.

The opening paragraph visible across the lower third of the screenshot reads: “While well intending citizens lined up, did the right thing, and received their COVID19 vaccinations, now known to do more harm than good, their unvaccinated friends and family stood by and let them do it. Even though they knew what we didn’t. Some of them said too little. Some said nothing at all. Our blood is now on their hands

Reuters then cites this tweet from the known weirdo and rat fink Ramz Paul:

Ramz Paul is a sick person, and I believe he is likely some kind of government agent. Seriously, this guy is one of the single most bizarre and fundamentally dishonest individuals I’ve ever run across on the internet. It is no surprise that he is a part of this psyop.

Why would he make a fake screenshot of a real article and post that? What would compel someone to do something like that, under any circumstances, other than attempting to help these fact-check hoaxers?

I’ve been saying for a long, long time that the fact-checkers do exactly this: put out fake versions of something real, and then “debunk” their own fakes. This is similar to the way that anti-virus software makers in the 1990s allegedly made viruses for the purpose of getting people to buy their software.

This is them being caught red-handed.

And before someone says “well, maybe someone saw the fake screen shot and wrote a real article based on it?”

Nope.

Google archive shows that the article was originally posted on December 2, 2022.

Therefore, the fake screenshot, which appears to have been originally posted by Ramz Paul, was copied off of this IQfy article.

This is the way 95% of this “fact-checking” works – they find (or, very likely, create themselves) slightly wrong versions of real things and then debunk the fake thing without mentioning the real thing. The other 5% is fact-checking the Babylon Bee or other known satire sites, or just doing retarded stuff like “debunking” Donald Trump’s claim that injecting bleach cures the coronavirus.

This whole “fact-check” industry which popped up after the 2016 election is a gigantic scam. I’ve been fact-checking these fact-checkers for years, and the depths to which they will sink is an outrage.

]]> Google to Experiment in India With Mass Online “Prebunking” to Combat “Misinformation” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/12/07/google-to-experiment-in-india-with-mass-online-prebunking-to-combat-misinformation/ Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000

This is a Jewish mind control program.

These Jews are not the masters of reality. In fact, they are liars (their father was a liar from the beginning).

Lying Jews have zero business telling people in India what truth and reality is.

Reuters:

Google’s Jigsaw subsidiary is launching a new anti-misinformation project in India, aimed at preventing misleading information that has been blamed for inciting violence, a top executive said.

The initiative will use “prebunking” videos – designed to counter false claims before they become widespread – circulated on the company’s YouTube platform and other social media sites.

Google’s efforts to challenge the spread of misinformation mark a contrast with rival Twitter which is cutting its trust and safety teams, despite new owner Elon Musk saying it will not become a “free-for-all hellscape”.

Google recently conducted an experiment in Europe where it sought to counter anti-refugee narratives online in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The experiment in India will be bigger in scope as it will deal with multiple local languages — Bengali, Hindi and Marathi — and cover diverse sections of a country populated by over a billion people.

“This presented an opportunity to research prebunking in a non-western, global south market,” said Beth Goldman, Jigsaw’s head of research and development.

Like other countries, misinformation spreads rapidly across India, mostly through social media, creating political and religious tensions.

Aside from the obviously Jewish nature of this strange swindle, just think about how much of this fact-checking has been wrong since 2016. Basically every major fact-checking project was spewing complete lies while accusing people who were telling the truth of “disinformation.”

Just with the coronavirus thing alone. Wow.

And what about that Russia hoax? That was the biggest political hoax in history.

It just goes on and on.

Sometimes these fact checkers plant fake stories on Facebook and then fact-check obviously fake stuff. But in general, most fact-checks are just total lies.

“Pre-bunking” adds another insidious layer, as it’s widely understood that your brain attaches special relevance to the first thing you hear on a topic, and you then have to be convinced otherwise.

]]> AP Fact-Checks IRS Plan to Kill You https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/08/21/ap-fact-checks-irs-plan-to-kill-you/ Sun, 21 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000

These are recent images from the IRS program to train agents to murder people who don’t pay enough taxes

So the IRS is hiring 87,000 new people, some number of whom are being trained to kill people. Everyone agrees on that.

There is video of them training to kill.

Related: Watch: Armed IRS Agents Wearing Bulletproof Vests Train to Arrest People

But I guess someone on the internet said that all 87,000 new agents are being trained to kill, and the government hasn’t explicitly said that – so the Associated Press needed to fact-check the dumb idiots saying that.

AP:

It’s being claimed by some that an online job ad shows that all new employees that the IRS intends to hire after a funding boost in the Inflation Reduction Act will be required to carry a firearm and use deadly force if necessary.

Here’s the truth: The job description does not apply to most potential new employees that the IRS will hire in the coming years, and the vast majority of IRS workers are not armed.

How are those things in contradiction?

There was an ad saying that new IRS employees would need to use deadly force. And there is video of them training with weapons.

No one knows how many of the 87,000 new agents will be armed and trained to kill.

A legitimate job ad for special agents within the small law-enforcement division of the IRS that works on criminal investigations was misrepresented online following the passage this month of a $740 billion economic package that includes nearly $80 billion for the IRS.

Many posts in recent days shared a screenshot that features the IRS logo and the text, “Major Duties.”

The listed duties on the image include being able to “carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force, if necessary.” Social-media users claimed that the image was a job ad for thousands of new IRS employees that will be hired as a result of the bill.

“The IRS is looking to fill 87,000 positions,” one Facebook user who shared the image wrote. “Requirements include working min ‘50 hours per week, which may include irregular hours, and be on-call 24/7, including holidays and weekends’ and ‘Carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force, if necessary.’ ”

A Twitter user wrote: “Want to be one of the new 87,000 IRS agents? Are you willing to carry a firearm and use DEADLY FORCE? This is not at all concerning.” These social media users are falsely depicting a legitimate job ad for a special agent with IRS Criminal Investigation as a generic ad for all new positions.

While that language does not currently appear on the IRS web page advertising the special agent role, a search of the Internet Archive shows that the same language can be found on the page as recently as Aug. 11.

Yes – they removed it because people were claiming that the IRS was hiring cops to kill people for not paying enough taxes.

The fact that they deleted it from their page seems to indicate something bad.

But what are we even arguing about here, AP?

Okay, you can find some random person on Facebook that said all 87,000 are going to be armed, that that presumably is an exaggeration. So what? They are hiring new armed agents and no one has explained why the IRS would need to kill people.

Why not do a fact check on “why the IRS needs to kill people”?

This is what they do with these ridiculous “fact-checks”: they take something real, then find some random person on Facebook saying a slightly wrong version of the real thing. Then they debunk the random person. Then, when people see the headline, they think that the original thing that was real has been debunked.

Here’s their headline:

Well – how many thousands of armed agents are they hiring? The AP admits that they are hiring armed agents and training them to kill, then they just say “well, it’s not all 87,000.”

Okay – how many is it?

But people will see that headline and think “oh that person I saw saying the IRS is hiring armed agents much have been from QAnon fake news of Moscow.”

How about: “fact check: why can’t the IRS just call up local police if they think someone they are auditing is planning to kill them? Fact check: why can’t they bring an FBI agent? Fact check: in what situation does the IRS need to use deadly force?”

I’m so sick of these fake fact checkers.

It’s so dumb.

They keep fact-checking satire too.

It’s just a ridiculous thing.

As far as I can tell, they are planning to send IRS agents to kill people – or at least they want people to think they’re doing that.

The best you can hope for is that the IRS agent they send to kill you is really hot and the last thing you see is her tits hanging out before she blows your brains out and loots your safe.

]]> Great Reset Has Been Debunked, Twitter and Reuters Fact Checkers Say https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/12/22/great-reset-has-been-debunked-twitter-and-reuters-fact-checkers-say/ Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000

NEW – "Fact-checkers" scramble on Twitter to clarify Klaus Schwab's plan for the "Great Reset." pic.twitter.com/2xqrWxNabX

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) December 22, 2021

It was all just a strange dream.

In 2030, you’ll own lots 0f things and be miserable.

 

The World Economic Forum doesn’t even exist, and there is no book by the founder of the World Economic Forum called “Covid-19: The Great Reset.”

It’s a dangerous theory spread by Amazon.com.

Here’s a comprehensive debunking of the conspiracy theory that states that the people profiting from the vaccines and the pandemic hoax are evil and have ulterior motives. (Many thanks to the anonymous internet person who compiled these.)

]]> Pre-Bunks: Twitter Now Preemptively Debunking Climate Change “Misinformation” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/11/02/pre-bunks-twitter-now-preemptively-debunking-climate-change-misinformation/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000

Total control of the narrative.

It’s so funny to watch these tech companies struggle with the fact that the government is now pressuring them to ban over half of their American user base.

When it was just the Israeli and Jewish lobby (Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center), they could throw them bones with bannings here and there. Some of the “conservative” stuff the Jews didn’t care about because it’s pro-Israel. Now, the Biden Administration just wants anyone who supports any idea associated with the right or Republicans banned outright.

They’re trying to do the “throw them a bone” tactic and it’s not working.

Axios:

Twitter on Monday said it will be making authoritative information about climate change more accessible to users during this year’s United Nations COP26 climate summit.

Why it matters: It’s the latest tech giant to take aim at climate misinformation, expected to be more prevalent during the global conference, which brings together leaders from around the world to discuss the climate crisis.

…

Details: Twitter on Monday will role out a new program designed to “pre-bunk” climate misinformation, or get ahead of false narratives about climate by exposing people to more accurate information about the crisis on its platform.

The pre-bunks, which include authoritative information about topics like the science backing climate change and global warming from experts, will appear in users‘ “explore” tabs, ”search” portals, and Twitter trends lists.

The company says it’s working with a range of experts globally to provide context on topics that are going to be discussed during COP26. The company will also host relevant organizations via Twitter Spaces (live conversations).

The pre-bunks will be available globally, in Arabic, English, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish.

…

A spokesperson says the company plans to stop showing pre-bunks after COP26 but will continue to monitor conversations and “can resurface context as needed” around the topic in the future.

I guess the easiest thing for Twitter to do would be to convince their own users to actually believe in Democrat policies, I guess. Then they wouldn’t have to be banned. But that’s not happening.

At this point, no one is going to change their view about anything. (A few Democrat voters might switch over when they start to realize the vax is causing health problems in everyone they know, or figure out other obvious things. There are apparently a lot of Democrats voting Republican in Virginia today.)

The other idea is to make right-wingers afraid of being banned, and cause a chilling effect. But that is mostly only going to work on big accounts. Randos who fill the ranks of Twitter’s user base don’t care if they get banned.

]]> Facebook Now Shadowbans People Who Share Content Deemed Misinformation by Their Fact Checkers https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/05/27/facebook-now-shadowbans-people-who-share-content-deemed-misinformation-by-their-fact-checkers/ Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0000

Mark Zuckerberg thought sunscreen on his face would be a disguise. He has good ideas.

A May 26 post on Facebook’s blog announced that the company is embracing various new forms of censorship it has invented to prevent people from looking at factual information.

They have launched a warning system to tell you that you may be entering a danger zone.

Today, we’re launching new ways to inform people if they’re interacting with content that’s been rated by a fact-checker as well as taking stronger action against people who repeatedly share misinformation on Facebook. Whether it’s false or misleading content about COVID-19 and vaccines, climate change, elections or other topics, we’re making sure fewer people see misinformation on our apps.

They are presenting this as a positive development that gives you “more information” that you may be viewing ideas which go against the established narrative.

We want to give people more information before they like a Page that has repeatedly shared content that fact-checkers have rated, so you’ll see a pop up if you go to like one of these Pages. You can also click to learn more, including that fact-checkers said some posts shared by this Page include false information and a link to more information about our fact-checking program. This will help people make an informed decision about whether they want to follow the Page.

The warnings look like this:

Just to be clear “independent fact checkers” do not “check facts.” They simply use the mainstream media narrative (which is uniform) as a basis for the arbitration of reality.

“False information” is anything that veers from the official narrative published by the New York Times, Washington Post and CNN.

They also announced that they will be manually down-ranking information that they do not like.

Since launching our fact-checking program in late 2016, our focus has been on reducing viral misinformation. We’ve taken stronger action against Pages, Groups, Instagram accounts and domains sharing misinformation and now, we’re expanding some of these efforts to include penalties for individual Facebook accounts too. Starting today, we will reduce the distribution of all posts in News Feed from an individual’s Facebook account if they repeatedly share content that has been rated by one of our fact-checking partners. We already reduce a single post’s reach in News Feed if it has been debunked.

Again, “debunked” means that the media said it was “debunked.” It’s important to understand that there is no other methodology involved here. All they do is compare content to the one put out by CNN, and if it veers from that, it is labeled “misinformation,” “disinformation” and “debunked.”

This situation went beyond satire when Project Veritas leaked a private video chat featuring Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the vaccines.

He said: “I just want to share some caution on this, because we just don’t know the long term of effect of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

This is exactly the sentiment that he is currently censoring, claiming it is “misinformation” that has been “debunked.”

Note that we always used to embed a tweet featuring that clip, but it was removed from Twitter when all of the Project Veritas accounts were banned. It now only exists on Bitchute (the above embed). Many, many things now only exist on Bitchute.

If Bitchute goes down, this video, along with so many others, will simply disappear forever.

Internet censorship is the worst thing that has ever happened. In 2017, when this campaign started with the organized and public conspiracy to completely remove Daily Stormer from the internet (including Google stealing DailyStormer.com), we were on such a roll.

The internet had just successfully elected a president, and it seemed like there was nothing we couldn’t do. Everything continued to get bigger, more and more people continued to be exposed to the information. That was all destroyed.

The youth right-wing movement was smothered in the crib. If we’d allowed to been able to continue to speak freely, the coronavirus hoax would have been impossible, Donald Trump would have won the 2020 election outright (fraud would have been impossible without the virus hoax and mail-in ballot scheme), and we’d be getting ready for Tucker Carlson 2024.

Instead, we now stand at the edge of the pit of hell.

And somehow, after all of this, Facebook is still inventing new ways to censor people.

]]> Jew “Fact Checker” Erin Biba Deletes Twitter Account After Blaming White Supremacy for a Black Man Stabbing Jews https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/12/30/jew-fact-checker-erin-biba-deletes-twitter-account-after-blaming-white-supremacy-for-a-black-man-stabbing-jews/ Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
December 30, 2019

The Jew Erin Biba works for NBC News. Her job is to check facts and she has a face you can trust!

Saturday night, Erin Biba, a Jew who checks facts for NBC News, posted this tweet on her verified Twitter account.

For someone who checks facts for a living, she is obviously terrible at her job. Because we already know who attacked those Jews. It is not a complicated situation as she implied in her tweet.

The individual who stabbed those Jews was a black man named Grafton Thomas. He was detained by police and pictures of him have been plastered everywhere. The Associated Press and all the major news services have carried this story.

But what on earth does White supremacy have to do with a Negro stabbing a bunch of Jews?

We weren’t the only ones confused. Twitter exploded with people demanding a more detailed explanation.

Here’s just a small sample of the backlash she received.

This professional checker of facts couldn’t handle all the criticism, so she not only locked her account but deleted it!

As mentioned earlier, Erin is Jewish. Even though she deleted her Twitter account, she previously referred to herself as a descendant of Holocaust survivors in a tweet she posted whining about Donald Trump’s executive order on anti-Semitism.

So between her very Jewish behavior and this tweet, her status as a Jew is confirmed. A tweet from earlier this year was documented on Hot Air.

This situation surrounding Erin Biba should serve as a valuable lesson to people.

Never trust anyone who calls themselves a “fact checker” and more importantly never trust Jews. But never ever in a million years trust a Jewish “fact checker.”

]]> Fake News Hoaxers Snopes Caught Perpetrating Yet Another Hoax https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/03/07/fake-news-hoaxers-snopes-caught-perpetrating-yet-another-hoax/ Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
March 7, 2017


David and Barbara Mikkelson and their cat: The final determiners of truth and reality.

The “fact checking” sensation Snopes, run by two house-bound liberal baby boomers, David and Barbara Mekkelson, recently joined other Judenpresse platforms to claim investigative journalist Benny Johnson lied about the fact that (((Debbie Wasserman-Schultz))) and Keith Ellison didn’t stand up for the second standing ovation in respects to war widow Carryn Owens.

I personally think the length of a clapping a trivial thing to make a thing out of, but the issue here is that Jewish media moguls have elevated Snopes as the final verdict on what’s real and what’s “fake news,” and they’ve just been caught in a bald faced lie.

The system claims journalism they don’t micromanage and pre-approve is “fake news,” something Angela Merkel’s dictatorship has used as an alibi for cracking down on critical journalists during an election year.

Snopes has been transformed from a site that debunks Big Foot into a key propaganda instrument of the Democratic Party. It is relevant in the passive American dictatorship because its promotion by hacks has gotten it contracts with social media platforms like Facebook, who have hired a random eccentric leftist California couple to get the last say on what’s allowed to be discussed and what isn’t.

The New York Times and other Zionist broadsheets copy and pasted Snopes’ claim, but were forced to issue a retraction. Snopes itself had egg on its face.

The other crack team of truth-prophets, Politifact, are apparently sticking to their story, but using pointless semantics to spin it in their own favor.

Politifact:

Bloggers said, “Top Democrats refuse to stand for Gold Star widow.”

That makes it sound as if the blue side of the aisle stubbornly stayed seated while the GOP cheered for the widow of a Navy SEAL killed in a raid in Yemen. A more accurate headline would be, “Top Democrats don’t stand as long as Republicans for Gold Star widow.” A video review shows Democrats including Sanders, Pelosi, Wasserman Schultz and Ellison stood. But most sat down while Republicans renewed their applause.

To say they outright refused to stand up is inaccurate. We rate these headlines False

This is a pretty stupid thing to lie about, seeing as millions of Americans watched the stream and saw Schultz and Ellison sitting. What big things is the Ministry of Truth misrepresenting or getting wrong?

The irony is that this whole fact-checking/fake news business is about discrediting President Trump and his supporters, and nothing more. It’s an agenda protection mechanism straight out of 1984: if the goyim know and you can’t shut it down, then try and “fact check” them until they’re frozen in confusion.

Luckily this latest attempt at controlling the public’s access to free flowing information has been quickly discredited and is now mocked. But that doesn’t mean real fact-checking, like the work done by the Daily Stormer, isn’t important.

]]>