Facebook leader Mark Zuckerberg recently took the redpill and became a based patriot. Now he is going to war with the ratty woke kikes from Israel who are hacking all of his mainframes.

Reuters:

An official with Meta Platforms’ popular WhatsApp chat service said Israeli spyware company Paragon Solutions had targeted scores of its users, including journalists and members of civil society.

The official said on Friday that WhatsApp had sent Paragon a cease-and-desist letter following the hack. In a statement, WhatsApp said the company “will continue to protect people’s ability to communicate privately.”

Paragon declined to comment.

The WhatsApp official told Reuters it had detected an effort to hack approximately 90 users.

The official declined to say who, specifically, was targeted. But he said those targeted were based in more than two dozen countries, including several people in Europe. He said WhatsApp users were sent malicious electronic documents that required no user interaction to compromise their targets, a so-called zero-click hack that is considered particularly stealthy.

Zero-click is a massive disaster.

They can do this to anyone now.

There is no communication safe as long as the Jews are allowed to continue to use their internationally illegal hacking tools.

Israel is the only country that allows this sort of software to be developed. (Or, at least it’s the only country that has people capable of developing it and also allows it, there’s probably no ban on it in Bangladesh or whatever.)

The official said WhatsApp had since disrupted the hacking effort and was referring targets to Canadian internet watchdog group Citizen Lab. The official declined to discuss how it determined that Paragon was responsible for the hack. He said law enforcement and industry partners had been informed, but declined to give details.

The FBI did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

The wokesters at the FBI, who promoted the discredited Russia hoax and hid the truth about Hunter Biden’s laptop from hell, can’t be trusted to crack down on the wokester kikes hacking everyone’s mainframes.

Citizen Lab researcher John Scott-Railton said the discovery of Paragon spyware targeting WhatsApp users “is a reminder that mercenary spyware continues to proliferate and as it does, so we continue to see familiar patterns of problematic use.”

Spyware merchants such as Paragon sell high-end surveillance software to government clients and typically pitch their services as critical to fighting crime and protecting national security.

But such spy tools have repeatedly been discovered on the phones of journalists, activists, opposition politicians, and at least 50 U.S. officials, raising concerns over the unchecked proliferation of the technology.

Typically, a foreign country hacking and spying on US government officials would constitute an act of war against the United States.

But of course, the United States is totally run by kikes, and thus has an “Israel exemption” for committing acts of war against our country.

Paragon – which was reportedly acquired by Florida-based investment group AE Industrial Partners last month – has tried to position itself publicly as one of the industry’s more responsible players.

Its website advertises “ethically based tools, teams, and insights to disrupt intractable threats,” and media reports citing people familiar with the company say Paragon only sells to governments in stable democratic countries.

Jews will say anything is ethical.

They say their discredited gender theories are ethical and they chop teen girls’ tits off.

“Jewish ethics” is an oxymoron, and it’s time for America to get redpilled on that particular fact.

Illegal hate speech is a systemic threat for democracy & fundamental rights.

The new ‘Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online +’ integrated into the DSA is crucial to strengthen how online platforms deal with illegal hate speech content.

More ↓ @EU_Justice

— Digital EU 🇪🇺 (@DigitalEU) January 20, 2025

The US could easily put pressure on Europe and force them to accept American standards for freedom of speech.

It would be very easy.

The only reason the EU is so strict about speech is because the US pressured them in the first place.

Reuters:

Meta’s Facebook, Elon Musk’s X, Google’s YouTube and other tech companies have agreed to do more to tackle online hate speech under an updated code of conduct that will now be integrated into EU tech rules, the European Commission said on Monday.

Other signatories to the voluntary code set up in May 2016 are Dailymotion, Instagram, Jeuxvideo.com, LinkedIn, Microsoft hosted consumer services, Snapchat, Rakuten Viber, TikTok and Twitch.

“In Europe there is no place for illegal hate, either offline or online. I welcome the stakeholders’ commitment to a strengthened Code of conduct under the Digital Services Act (DSA),” EU tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen said in a statement.

…

Under the revised code, the companies pledged to allow not-for-profit or public entities with expertise on illegal hate speech to monitor how they review hate speech notices, and to assess at least two thirds of these notices received from them within 24 hours.

More meaningful than banning trannies and DEI (which were already on their way out) would be if the Trump Administration forced the EU to respect American freedom of speech laws.

That’s probably not totally beyond the scope of things Trump would be willing to do. People would still get arrested in Europe for speech, of course, but he could prevent the EU from being able to fine American companies for allowing free speech.

“The DSA does not censor content. It creates efficient mechanism for the removal of illegal content defined by other EU or national law,such as illegal hate speech.Because what is illegal offline is also illegal online”@HennaVirkkunen –#DSA debate

📹https://t.co/nWDqHxpSxj pic.twitter.com/ZnsSrfpJ3f

— European Parliament Audiovisual Service (@europarlAV) January 21, 2025

The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good).

Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke” or some such.

I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears to have taken on a much more masculine identity as a result of his MMA training, and he actually says as much in clear terms, saying that the corporate world is feminized and he wants to change the entire environment.

He addressed the fact that he came out with his new anti-censorship policies immediately after Trump’s election by saying that there is no good time to announce such sweeping changes, but that he thinks the best time to do so is in the wake of a sweeping election, when he can line his policies up with popular opinion.

Along with condemning the censorship pushed on him by the Biden administration and the FBI before them, and coming out with a strong free speech position which appeared grounded in genuine philosophical principles, he stated plainly that the actions by the Biden people and the FBI in ordering Facebook to do censorship were “definitely illegal,” though he stopped short of saying that these people should all go to prison. He said the main issues involving free speech were “disinformation and so-called hate speech,” and that both of these categories are free speech which have to be respected in any free society.

He talked about AI and said that the best way to prevent abuse is by making everything open source so that everyone has access to the software. This is 100% true, and it’s exactly what I’ve been saying since ChatGPT emerged. You cannot possibly stop the development of these technologies, and the biggest threat they present is a situation where only one or a few companies and the US government have the technology, and then use it against the public. If everyone has the same access, we can all use it and defend from abusive companies and governments.

Joe started rattling off Elon Musk’s completely retarded gibberish about how “AI will become sentient” and develop some kind of agenda. Although Zuck is not the best orator, he had a good analysis of this whole “it will become sentient” issue, saying that people naturally associate consciousness with intelligence, so they assume that if something is intelligent, it must have some kind of goal, while this is in fact not true. Obviously, and I hope this is obvious, the only way an AI could do something destructive is if someone programmed it to do so. There is no possible way it could “become sentient,” and the basic concept does not make any sense. It’s not clear why Elon goes around fearmongering with this total nonsense from low-grade science fiction, but maybe he wants to sabotage his competition because his own AI is so vastly inferior to all of his competitors (despite his huge head start). Regardless, Zuck politely rejected this stupid claims of “sentient AI,” though I have no doubt Joe will continue to spread these falsehoods, as he likes them for some reason (that’s at least partially based on his ridiculous perception that Elon Musk is intelligent, which has been repeatedly disproved).

Zuck also said that along with MMA, he has gotten into hunting, and is hunting and eating wild pigs on his Hawaii property. Again, we see that he’s not really that Jewish. While Joe might not be very smart on the issue of AI, he’s definitely an expert on bow hunting, and his knowledge in that discussion was impressive. It’s something I’ve always wanted to get into.

I wish they would have talked about the H-1B issue, which is the most important issue for me. Zuck has come out with much stronger free speech positions than Elon Musk, and Elon Musk, who is a fat slob, looks terrible now in comparison to Zuck who is a champion of freedom. Zuck has an opportunity now to come out and attack Elon on the H-1B issue as well. Facebook has lobbied in favor of unlimited H-1Bs in the past, but there is no reason this position can’t be reversed in order to attack and undermine the traitor and tyrant Elon Musk, and to defend the American people. I hope that Zuck will consider using the issue as another point of attack on the censorious fraud and traitorous scam artist Elon Musk, who is also a terrorist trying to completely destroy America.

In another comparison to Elon Musk, Zuck’s stated views on China are extreme but nowhere near as extreme as Musk’s. He says that America should try to lead in the field of AI, but did not make any kind of overarching claim about the need of America to somehow beat China’s GDP. In general, he is much more down to earth, thoughtful, and intelligent than Elon Musk, and he just makes more sense when he talks.

Further, he condemned Elon’s plan to implant everyone with brain chips, and said that the interactive AI should be done with a bracelet.

I’ve actually very excited about where this is all going. It really does look like the entire culture has shifted dramatically. I think we definitely need to note that this was clearly allowed to happen, presumably because the government feared some kind of violent uprising. However, even though it was allowed to happen, there are opportunities being presented by the changes in the culture. No one can claim that less censorship is not better.

These DEI stuff was really extreme and stupid, so one shouldn’t overstate how much it means that companies are getting rid of it. What the US government did was demand that companies hire a bunch of worthless niggers to do nothing and drain their resources, and it is just obvious that any for-profit company is going to get rid of these programs as soon as possible.

However, while DEI was too silly to exist indefinitely, it is nonetheless something that was really shoved down the throat of America in a very brutal way, and it is not a small thing that it is being rejected on such a large scale by all of the top companies in America.

Axios:

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is terminating major DEI programs, effective immediately — including for hiring, training and picking suppliers, according to a new employee memo obtained by Axios.

The move is a strong signal to Meta employees that the company’s push to make inroads with the incoming Trump administration isn’t just posturing, but an ethos shift that will impact its business practices.

Meta said it was changing course because the “legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing,” per a memo by Janelle Gale, vice president of human resources.

The moves come just three days after Meta ended many of its efforts to fact-check and police speech on Facebook, Instagram and Threads.

…

Friday’s memo by Gale — announcing changes to “our hiring, development and procurement practices” — was posted for Meta employees in Workplace, the company’s internal communications tool.

“The legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing,” Gale wrote.

“The Supreme Court of the United States has recently made decisions signaling a shift in how courts will approach DEI. … The term ‘DEI’ has also become charged, in part because it is understood by some as a practice that suggests preferential treatment of some groups over others.”

I think it’s just a stated fact that the program supports preferential treatment for brown people. That was the whole point. George Floyd got snuffed out like a little bitch while he was crying for his mommy and then the entire media and government apparantus started demanding that whites be replaced with niggers in order to compensate for the loss of Floyd’s worthless life.

It was basically the weirdest thing ever.

Citing the aforementioned memo, Axios notes the following policies that will be changed at Facebook:

Cutting Meta’s DEI team: Meta will no longer have a team focused on DEI. Maxine Williams, the company’s chief diversity officer, is taking on a new role at Meta, focused on accessibility and engagement, Gale wrote.

Ending equity and inclusion programs: Meta will instead build programs “that focus on how to apply fair and consistent practices that mitigate bias for all, no matter your background,” Gale said.

Sunsetting supplier diversity efforts: Meta will end efforts to source business suppliers from diverse-owned businesses. Moving forward, the company will “focus our efforts on supporting small and medium-sized businesses that power much of our economy,” Gale wrote.

Ending the “Diverse Slate Approach” to hiring: While Meta will continue to source candidates from different backgrounds, it will no longer use the diverse-slate hiring approach, which ensures a diverse pool of candidates is considered for every open position. “We believe there are other ways to build an industry-leading workforce and leverage teams made up of world-class people from all types of backgrounds,” Gale wrote.

It sounds pretty good to me, though all of those policies would be irrelevant to me if Zuck gets behind Elon’s plan to completely replace the American people with disgusting sewer mutants from India. My hope is that Zuck will come out and condemn Elon’s plan to bury us in Indians (I’m aware of the fact he’s supported this agenda in the past, but I see no reason he can’t change his position).

McDonald’s and Walmart have also totally canceled their DEI policies, effectively claiming that niggers are worthless and do not deserve jobs, as they should instead be returned to Africa where they can no longer cause these problems.

Sympathy for the blacks has reached an all-time low. Sympathy was highest after George Floyd’s worthless life was snuffed out, and instead of using this sympathy to gain power in society, blacks used the opportunity to whine even louder and commit massive theft on a grand scale.

Now, whites have seen the videos. They’ve seen so many of the videos.

Mass looting of Apple store in Philadelphia pic.twitter.com/9RQ4GYvpEy

— Liberty Pill Memes (@LibertyPillMeme) September 23, 2024

We’ve seen this video.

Stealing iPhones from an Apple store in broad daylight pic.twitter.com/wHQcAmS1go

— Crime Net (@TRIGGERHAPPYV1) February 8, 2024

Is there anything more infuriating than that video?

If someone in the store would have pulled out a gun and shot that nigger in his head, everyone in the store would have started cheering. I guarantee. No one wants people acting like this, and the fact that the media said it was good, and the sickening government cops just allowed blacks to do this, has completely discredited the entire American Empire system.

No one who has seen the videos can honestly claim that blacks are anything other than parasites and predators. People can say “well, not all of them are doing that,” but firstly, no one claimed they all were doing it, and secondly, enough of them are doing it that it’s obviously safe to generalize about this group of rough-riding apes.

I think Zuck should organize some kind of MMA tournament on George Floyd’s grave, or at least release a video of himself pissing on that grave.

It would also be cool if he announced a program to build “nigger-killing robots.”

Robots have been at the forefront of white civil rights for over a decade.

Previously: Facebook Cancels All DEI Programs, Looking Forward to an Aryan Future

I want to stress that everyone should be realistic about expectations. We are not yet on the verge of any type of revolution.

However, I would also not tell people not to take a bit of joy in the fact that this silly, toxic shit from the Jews is finally being rolled back, even if the roll back is not total.

Arguably, “men have periods too” was too stupid and sickening to remain a government mandate forever, but you can’t say it doesn’t feel good to have this thing coming to an end.

Post Millennial:

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Friday that his Meta company, which operates Facebook and Instagram, had abandoned its DEI practices. As part of that move, the company told facilities managers to remove the tampons from the men’s bathrooms.

“That same day at Meta’s offices in Silicon Valley,” The New York Times reported, “Texas and New York, facilities managers were instructed to remove tampons from men’s bathrooms, which the company had provided for nonbinary and transgender employees who use the men’s room and who may have required sanitary pads, two employees said.”

Some people could hardly beleive that this had been the state of things at the social media giant.

The move comes as Zuckerberg has made a sharp, right political pivot in recent months. He had a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago home after which he announced a change to the fact-checking policies at Meta, announced that the content moderation team would be moving to Texas, and said that the era of censorship on both Instagram and Facebook was over.

The Times notes that the process by which these changes have been made is different than status quo for the company. “The entire process was highly unusual,” the Times said. “Meta typically alters policies that govern its apps — which include Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads — by inviting employees, civic leaders and others to weigh in. Any shifts generally take months. But Mr. Zuckerberg turned this latest effort into a closely held six-week sprint, blindsiding even employees on his policy and integrity teams.”

Facebook especially had been a bastion of woke during the Trump years and the Covid era. It was in 2020 that Facebook had implemented a third-party fact-checking program that allowed groups to go through user posts and flag those for removal or suppression that did not align with specific, partisan narratives. Those fact-checkers suppressed and censored user content about the 2020 election, about gender ideology, about climate change, and about Covid lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine efficacy, among other things.

I don’t think it’s fair to claim that Facebook was worse than the rest of the tech companies. Although Elon did lighten up on the woke stuff at Twitter, it was at least as bad as Facebook before Elon bought it.

YouTube was maybe not as extreme in its enforcement, and it is certainly notable that you were still allowed to say basically anything in YouTube comments.

Regardless, the reason that Facebook was so extreme, we now know, is that the government was ordering them to be extreme, while that vile cunt Elizabeth Warren was threatening to completely destroy the company if Zuck didn’t go along with the mass censorship agenda. It’s difficult to blame Facebook for doing what they need to to prevent the government from destroying their company, and Zuck deserves a whole lot of credit for coming out against this stuff as soon as Trump is coming into office.

Facebook has changed its policies so that you are now allowed to engage in “hate speech,” including racial dialogue and accusing trannies of being mentally ill. With Elon now engaged in a widespread and goofy program of censorship, it is quite possible that Facebook or one of the other Meta websites will become a top bastion of free speech in 2025.

Zuckerberg needs to seriously consider launching a campaign against Twitter, condemning Elon Musk for censoring his critics, and inviting people who believe in free speech to join his platforms. While that would then make him responsible for upholding high standards of free speech, it would also completely crush Elon Musk.

Previously: Zuckerberg has a Golden Opportunity to Rebrand His Twitter Clone as “The Free Speech Alternative to Twitter”

There could only be a showdown with Facebook if the US government allowed Europe to have such a showdown. Europe does not have independent policies, all of them are dictated to them by the United States. Obviously, they have stricter speech rules than the US (at least technically), but those rules are all driven by the US desire to shut down speech globally.

Just look at the way the Germans have gone along with supporting Ukraine terrorism against their country, gone along with collapsing their own industrial sector, because the US tells them to do that. It’s ridiculous and humiliating.

However, US organs at the State Department probably do not agree with Donald Trump easing the restrictions on speech rules in America, and they will likely use European bodies to attack those changes.

The Guardian:

Sweeping changes to the policing of Meta’s social media platforms have set the tech company on a collision course with legislators in the UK and the European Union, experts and political figures have said.

Lawmakers in Brussels and London criticised Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to scrap factcheckers in the US for Facebook, Instagram and Threads, with one labelling it “quite frightening”.

The changes to Meta’s global policies on hateful content now include allowing users to call transgender people “it”, with the guidelines stating: “We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation.”

Chi Onwurah, the Labour MP and chair of the science and technology committee for the House of Commons, which is investigating how online disinformation fuelled last summer’s riots, said Zuckerberg’s decision to replace professional factcheckers with users policing the accuracy of posts was “concerning” and “quite frightening”.

“To hear that Meta is removing all its factcheckers [in the US] is concerning … people have a right to be protected from the harmful effects of misinformation,” she said. “The fact that Zuckerberg said he’s following the example of X must raise concerns when we compare how X is a platform for misinformation to a greater extent than Facebook has been.”

Chi Onwurah is frightened.

She’s one of the top British people, you know.

People better take her emotions seriously.

Meta’s move, which Zuckerberg made clear was a response to the incoming Donald Trump presidency, also prompted predictions that a major challenge is coming from the Trump administration against laws such as the Online Safety Act.

The former UK technology minister, Damian Collins, said such a challenge will “most likely be made through trade negotiations where pressure will be brought against the UK to accept American standards for digital regulation”.

…

A Meta whistleblower told the Guardian: “I am extremely concerned about what this means for teenagers.”

Teenagers are useless anyway.

Who cares what happens to them?

Arturo Béjar, a former senior engineer whose responsibilities at Meta included child safety measures, said: “They will be increasingly exposed to all the content categories that they need to be protected against.”

Harmful content, including violent or pornographic material, could reach young users more easily, Bejar said, citing Zuckerberg’s statement that tackling “lower severity” transgressions will now rely on users flagging content before Meta acts on it.

…

Zuckerberg has said his policy of ditching factcheckers applies only in the US for now, but his broadside against Europe has raised concerns that he is planning to roll out the approach in Europe.

It’s very expensive for these companies to do all of this censorship, which I think is why they’re all excited to stop doing it. With Twitter, it was something like 75% of employees at the company were working in the censorship department.

It’s all ridiculous, and hopefully we’re getting to the point where we can ask about personal responsibility, and start asking if it is possible for the government to view people as adults who are capable of making their own decisions.

Obviously, the idea that the government would view its citizens as adults capable of making decisions is far outside of established norms in the current year, with the government having moved to treat everyone like a little baby. Clearly, everyone in the government prefers to have strict policies that allow them to control what people think and do.

Previously: Zuckerberg Says Facebook Ending Ridiculous “Fact-Checker” Program

This week, Mark Zuckerberg posted a video announcing that he would be ending the “fact-checker” program at Facebook as part of a program to attempt to restore free speech on the platform.

He said that free speech is his values and so on, then totally said that he’s doing it because Donald Trump was elected with a massive mandate, and it proves that people do not want censorship of their views on trannies and race, so he’s following the will of the people and allowing them to promote racist and anti-homosexual material.

WATCH: “We’re gonna get rid of fact-checkers…”

In what looks almost like a hostage video, Zuckerberg bends the knee to Trump entirely — doing away with Facebook fact-checkers and moving the process to Texas under the guise of protecting free expression. pic.twitter.com/Ox0jeqBDBZ

— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) January 7, 2025

Zuckerberg’s new branding as the “cool 1990s wigger” is great by the way. I love it. People are saying “oh he’s just doing this fashion change to try to get people to like him more, it’s a total corporate branding operation,” and I’m like “yeah, and it’s working great – I now want to hang out with this guy and smoke weed and listen to The Chronic while we play Halo 1 on original X-Box.” I’ll be like “yo Zuck, pass that shit, dog” and he’ll be like “I got you, homie.” I have dreamt about this scenario daily ever since he unveiled his new look. I keep responding to all of his posts with a heart emoji in the hopes he’s going to invite me over to “hang.”

Furthermore, I think it’s unfair to assume it’s a marketing exercise for his brand, as he may well be experiencing a midlife crisis. He and I are about the same age and I myself recently transformed into a 1990s style wigger, except I also got some face tats to mix the style with 2010s wigger fashion trends. If a new form of wiggerism comes along in the next few years, I am planning to adopt that as well.

Trump was asked about this (the anti-censorship agenda, not the wigger thing, although I don’t know why he wasn’t asked about both), he he gave a funny answer.

The reporter claimed Trump had made “threats” and asked if he thought Zuck was responding to that, and Trump said, “probably, yeah. Probably.”

Q: Do you think Zuckerberg is responding to the threats you’ve made to him in the past?

TRUMP: Probably. Yeah. Probably. pic.twitter.com/1XT01KCDXc

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 7, 2025

Although it’s a very funny answer, and I am glad Trump is still funny (at least there’s that), there is some complexity to the issue.

Firstly, it’s not a question as to whether Trump becoming president affected Zuck’s decision: it said outright that it was the impetus for the decision. So the question itself was rather stupid, and the reporter only asked it that way because he wanted to include the word “threat.” (Obviously, the media is extremely upset by Zuck’s announcement, as the media is totally obsessed with censoring anyone who disagrees with their agenda.)

But the second and maybe more interesting thing is that Zuck was complaining about the FBI and the Biden long before Trump was even the nominee, when no one could have predicted the way things were going to go.

Appearing with the banal Jew Lex Fridman in June of 2023, Zuckerberg was asked about the censorship of Twitter, and told his story about the government coming and telling him he had to silence people.

Mark Zuckerberg admits social media companies helped the medical establishment censor scientific claims that were true.

This undermined the integrity of the public discussion about pandemic policy and undermined democracy.

The leaders of the medical community need to apologize. pic.twitter.com/9s24iowoTd

— Kevin Bass PhD MS (@kevinnbass) July 9, 2023

Whether or not Zuck actually cares about “free speech in principle” or not is probably debatable, but is ultimately irrelevant, as whatever his reasons are, he’s always defended free speech. When I was first coming up in this internet game, back in 2012-13, the ADL was harassing Facebook, demanding they ban Holocaust denial and material about Jewish ritual sacrifice, and Zuck just said “no, full stop.”

Presumably, censorship is very bad for his business, and that’s why he’s against it. But of course, people tend to believe things that are good for them financially, so again, the question of whether or not he actually genuinely believes in free speech is both debatable and irrelevant.

What he said on Fridman combined with what he’s said this week (and how delighted he seemed to be saying it!) gives us a clear picture: Facebook cannot operate without the support of the US government, and when the FBI and then the White House came to him demanding censorship, it was implicit that he wasn’t to go out and tell people “I’m just censoring this because the government told me I have to.” He was told to bring in these “fact-checkers” and just do whatever they told him to do, with the implication that there would be consequences if he didn’t do as he was ordered.

Some people are still mad about getting censored on Facebook. I wouldn’t know, because I don’t use Facebook, because I’m not a 60 year old looking to set up dates with Filipinas or divorced women I went to high school with. I do know what it is like to be censored, however, and I understand this makes people very angry. However, I don’t know what he was supposed to do.

People have also claimed that Zuckerberg is bad for having funded the Democrats in 2020, but the basic reality there is that because he knew about this illegal FBI-ordered mass censorship, he knew that the Democrats were rigging the election and were going to win regardless, so he put his money behind them so they didn’t come after him. Remember that it is Elizabeth Warren who is constantly saying she is going to “break up” Facebook. If you understand the way these things work, you understand that she doesn’t actually care about monopolies or whatever, she is just a representative for the Democrat Party issuing a threat to Mark Zuckerberg that they will destroy his company if he doesn’t do what he’s told.

While Zuckerberg was not allowed to publicly speak on the issue due to threats from the Biden people, he privately warned his staff that the vaccine would likely be dangerous and could cause genetic mutations.

Flashback:

In a Zoom call, Mark Zuckerberg warned his employees NOT TO GET THE COVID-19 VACCINE all the while he was censoring information about it on Facebook on behalf of the Biden Harris Administration.

Let that sink in! 🤨 pic.twitter.com/hKkaNGp5L6

— Epstein’s Sheet. 🧻 (@meantweeting1) August 27, 2024

I have seen people use that video to claim he was publicly trying to convince people to take the vaccine while privately warning people not to take it. But again, he was forced to stay quiet in public, but it’s notable that he had the decency to tell people in private, even people who were not his close friends or family, to beware of this deadly injection being forced on people by the US government.

Everything is different now, and you can see that Zuck, along with everyone else from Silicon Valley, is very much on the Trump Train. There are some good things that go along with that and as we saw over Christmas, some very bad things (people from India), but it is clearly what is happening. While Zuck announced a new pro-Trump agenda on Facebook – not only ending “fact-checkers,” but also reintroducing political content that will no doubt be promoting Trump and his policies – Jeff Bezos just announced that he’s paying Melania Trump $40 million dollars to make a documentary about her.

Although I am a big fan of his new look, I am not trying to promote Zuck as the ultimate free speech warrior. What I wanted to do was compare him to Elon Musk. Musk made this whole big show about how much he loves free speech, he claimed he was going to give free speech to everyone and allow anything on his site that wasn’t against the law. Because of this, Twitter lost all of their advertisers. After losing the advertisers, when he had nothing at all left to lose, Musk banned me and others. In the last weeks, he’s censored Laura Loomer and basically anyone else who disagreed with him about H-1B. Obviously, Zuckerberg is much more free speech oriented than Elon Musk. There is no evidence at all that Zuck has censored people for personal or political reasons, only ever enacting censorship under threats from the government.

Comparing the censorship track records of these two men is about like comparing their bodies.

There’s no contest.

Elon Musk is the worst scumbag on the planet earth, and I hope that now that he has the ability to do freedom of speech, Mark Zuckerberg will start marketing his Twitter clone “Threads” as “The Free Speech Alternative to Twitter.” If free speech is what is popular, as Zuckerberg says, then it should be very easy for Threads to launch a full assault on Twitter with a marketing campaign attacking Musk for his absurd and ultra-extremist censorship agenda.

If I was running this campaign for him (which I have not yet been asked to do, but would gladly accept in the event that I was asked to do it), I would also tell him to keep referring to it as “Twitter.” Just completely ignore all of this “X” bullshit in the marketing of the “Threads is the free speech alternative to Twitter” campaign.

Though it is likely that Zuckerberg would not want the baggage that would come along with hiring me to promote his product, he should absolutely consider hiring Laura Loomer, who I am quite certain would take the job.

Bezos is making a documentary about Melania Trump and Zuck is ending this “fact-checker” bullshit.

All the tech people are being very nice to Trump this time around, and the only price is infinity Indians forever.

The Hill:

Social media giant Meta on Tuesday announced a series of changes to its content moderation policies, including the elimination of its fact-checking program, in what CEO Mark Zuckerberg said was an effort to embrace free speech.

“We’re going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms,” Zuckerberg said in a video posted Tuesday morning.

“More specifically, here’s what we’re going to do. First, we’re going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X, starting in the U.S.”

The changes mark a major move for the parent company of Instagram and Facebook and follows a series of other changes the company has made in recent weeks as President-elect Trump heads into his second term later this month.

Meta’s yearslong fact-checking program enlisted the help of third-party fact-checkers that moderated posts in more than 60 languages. The company stated the practice eventually became too restrictive of posts over the years.

Yeah, I think it became effectively impossible to have any kind of free discussion at all. You were pretty much just allowed to agree with the government, and say nothing else.

Unless you were Ben Shapiro. Then you were allowed to complain about men in women’s sports for ten minutes before doing 50 minutes on how “Israel is our values.”

What we are seeing is the establishing of a new status quo. I don’t think it’s going to be very much better. The establishment just dropping some of the extreme “woke” stuff. I’m still banned from everything, and Elon Musk recently did censorship against Laura Loomer and others, so we’re not going to see any real change emerging. Everything is going to relate to dumb culture war issues, which literally do not matter at all.

I’m sure this will feel like a big victory to Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh, who have made huge careers talking about trannies in sports and how DEI is racist. But no one who cares about anything that actually matters is going to be given anything to get excited about.

What’s more, the Trump Administration has indicated it wants many more immigrants as well as further censorship of people who talk about the Jews. So while the new status quo might include some things that seem good, we’ve been promised that other things are going to get worse, potentially significantly worse.

Before Christmas, people were accusing me of being negative. However, I think after the Elon Musk “I’ll fuck your face because they’re culturally superior to you” fiasco, no one is accusing me of that anymore.

I will note that I don’t think Zuckerberg ever wanted to censor anyone and was actually mad about the Biden Administration forcing him to do so. I don’t think he actually cares about “freedom of speech” as an abstract value, but this censorship program was bad for business. He might even be willing to go along with a commission to imprison the people in the Biden Administration, including Anthony Fauci, who conspired to censor the American people. Of course, there is zero chance Trump would ever put together any such commission.

People are exhausted by democracy, and more and more, people are calling for a system that allows for freedom and prosperity.

Human Events:

A doctor in Australia may lose his medical license for posting conservative content online including articles from the Babylon Bee, a report from Caldron Pool has revealed.

Two anonymous complaints were lodged against Dr. Jereth Kok in 2018 over his social media content, after which he was placed under investigation by the Medical Board of Australia. He learned of the investigation 9 months later after the Board had scoured 10 years’ worth of his internet and social media content enlisting help from forensic specialists.

You needed “forensic specialists” to look through his Facebook account?

Why?

What skill is needed other than knowing how to read?

In their findings, they highlighted 80 Facebook posts they found problematic including 5 shared Babylon Bee articles. Other posts shared content from conservative creators such as Matt Walsh, Allie Beth Stuckey, and Katy Faust.

In 2019, Kok was told he would be immediately suspended from practicing medicine in order to protect the “public interest.” He has been on trial for professional misconduct since July 2024, a 5 year period past when he was suspended. The trial is set to end on October 14th when the fate of his career will be decided.

It seems like normal people are still not totally aware of the fact that you can have your life ruined over social media posts. It doesn’t seem like something you would assume would be real, so if you’re not following along closely, you just wouldn’t know it was happening.

It seems like you should get a warning, you know? Someone should tell you “actually, if you disagree with the government on the internet, we will completely destroy your life, so please don’t do that again.”

The @Meta Oversight Board released its decision that the phrase “from the river to the sea,” which calls to dismantle Israel, including through the removal of Jews from their ancestral homeland, should not be considered hate. We reject this short-sighted decision. Here’s why🧵 pic.twitter.com/GDlHw0IFdw

— ADL (@ADL) September 4, 2024

It is a call for a Palestinian state extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, territory that includes the entirety of the State of Israel, which would mean the dismantling of the Jewish state.

— ADL (@ADL) September 4, 2024

This decision continues the pattern of supreme indifference to online hate and harassment that has long been the hallmark of Meta’s leadership. Read our full comment to the Oversight board here: https://t.co/VLjLXMbF5j

— ADL (@ADL) September 4, 2024

WJC is disappointed that the @Meta Oversight Board failed to recognize that “From the River to the Sea”, which is part of the Hamas Terrorist Organization’s Charter, is inherently genocidal and antisemitic and should constitute hate speech.

Read our prior public comment to the…

— World Jewish Congress (@WorldJewishCong) September 4, 2024

Is “From the River to the Sea” hatespeech?

It might not sound as though it is, but actually, it is, because anything Jews don’t like is hatespeech.

That is the definition of the term. It’s called “hatespeech” because it is speech Jews hate.

New York Post:

Several members of Meta’s Oversight Board – which faced intense criticism after it determined the anti-Israel phrase “from the river to the sea” doesn’t constitute hate speech – have espoused views critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza.

The advisory board, which claims to be independent from Meta, determined that Facebook and Instagram users can use the controversial slogan – which has sprung up at anti-Israeli protests around the country – as long as it is not used in a way that glorifies Hamas or calls for violence.

Founded in 2020 with approval from Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg, the Oversight Board currently consists of 21 members who “come from a variety of cultural and professional backgrounds, speak more than 30 languages and are chosen to be reflective of the diverse users of Facebook, Instagram and Threads,” according to its website.

Yet past remarks by several members call into question their ability to remain impartial regarding the slogan, which refers to the idea of a Palestinian state stretching across the land in between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea – the land currently controlled by Israel.

Its members include Tawakkol Karman, a Yemini activist and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, who declared in a speech last May at the Vatican that the “world is silent in front of the genocide and the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people in Gaza.” Israel denounced her speech as “flagrantly anti-Semitic.”

Alan Rusbridger, the former editor-in-chief of left-leaning UK news outlet The Guardian, penned a column earlier this year arguing that, while “real and vile antisemitism” does exist, the “horrors of 7 October most certainly did not happen in a vacuum.” He also weighed in on the debate over “from the river to the sea.”

“Some even thought the chant worthy of prosecution. Yet Netanyahu recently pronounced that Israel “must have security control over the entire territory west of the Jordan River” – thereby wiping out the idea of a state of Palestine. Is one sayable, and the other not?” Rusbridger wrote.

Nighat Dad, the director of the Pakistan-based Digital Rights Foundation, accused Facebook in a 2018 column of caving to Israel by “silencing the voices of a historically victimized people for calling of what can rightfully be called an occupying state is confirmation of the influence that some governments have on Silicon Valley tech giants.”

Endy Bayuni, an Oversight Board member and senior editor at the Jakarta Post, penned a column last April that argued Indonesia “should be seen championing an independent Palestinian state and full membership of the United Nations.”

The Oversight Board did not reveal which of its members had participated in the vote or a tally of how many had voted for and against the decision. The Post has reached out to the board for comment.

See.

This is why Facebook is better than Twitter.

Elon Musk is a fat, gay retard.

He hates freedom and will crush it at every turn.

Facebook allows people to work to END THE JEWS once and for all.