The Atlantic has published a bizarre rant by “female journalist” Annie Lowrey denouncing people who respond to the lies of journalists with facts.

The Atlantic:

Pull down your mask, liberate your consciousness: It’s time to meet Facts Man.

Or examine him, really. You have met Facts Man before if you have spent any time online in the past half decade or so. He’s inescapable. He podcasts. He makes YouTube videos. He traffics in Medium posts. He burns up Facebook. And he loves—loves!—Twitter.

What does he serve up there? Truth. Facts. The overlooked and the undercovered. The unvarnished and obvious conclusions that the media do not want you to believe. The conclusions that the social-justice warriors and sheeple professors will not let you reach. The conclusions that mere mortals, including lauded subject-matter experts and the people who have actual lived experience of the topic at hand, have not yet grasped.

He—and he is almost always a he—is a venture capitalist who has analyzed the hospitalizations data! He is a growth hacker with a piercing view of race and measures of intelligence! He is an industry analyst with insight into viral spread! He is a lawyer exploding nuances of gender and sex!

The Facts Man gives it to you straight. With his college degree, with his top-quality résumé, with his insider knowledge, with his background in euclidean something-or-other—sharpened by debating with the smartest people, who never went to school—here is what he has found. These are the data. These are more data. This. Is. It. Here’s the inevitable conclusion. It’s the only conclusion possible!

If Facts Man is Political Facts Man, he’d rather not discuss his actual politics. Do not believe that his politics are precisely what they look like; just believe that his conclusions are what he says they are. Perhaps Facts Man is part of the intellectual dark web or the alt-center. Perhaps Facts Man hates the intellectual dark web or the alt-center. Perhaps Facts Man is clearly on the alt-right but also a fierce critic of the alt-right. He is not to be placed on the policy spectrum!

Facts Man’s politics are, in fact, non-politics. Facts Man hates politics, though not exclamation points! Facts Man hates the party system. Facts Man hates politicians. Facts Man hates political thinkers. That’s not a political statement! Facts Man cares about truth and truth only.

If Facts Man is Science Facts Man, he is adjacent to science, so he understands science better than scientists. He has credentials that let him look at the data and see them, instead of looking at the data and just looking at them. Or looking at them and interpreting them however your field interprets them. Or looking at them and waiting for them to be interpreted in the press. Science Facts Man operates without the encumbrances of peer review or any sense of the complexities endemic to many scientific fields. That is what he brings to the debate!

Facts Man is about truth, and by “truth,” Facts Man means the discourse. He parachutes in to rectify the discourse. He invites conversations. He ends conversations. He is not about contrarianism, but correctness. He is obsessed with the media, which he is not part of, though perhaps he is a major media figure himself. There’s no contradiction there.

She goes on and on like this for several more paragraphs, before getting to her “conclusion” – that she is sick of being corrected by MEN using facts against her on social media.

Facts Man is about the medium, meaning social media. Facts Man reaches everyone. Facts Man goes viral. Facts Man blasts out to every clear thinker out there, meaning he creates a political tribe of clear thinkers who think just like him! Clear thinkers who don’t care about feelings. The only feeling he has is righteous indignation.

You get the sense that Facts Man was the captain of his debate team. You get the sense that Facts Man went to law school because it teaches you how to think. Facts Man recently lost 15 pounds on the keto diet. Facts Man hates Disney moms. Facts Man claps on the one and the three.

Facts Man is a Man, if not a man. (He thinks this story is sexist.) Facts Man is a mechanism of discourse. Facts Men, they are everywhere. Facts, man. They’re out there.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.

Annie Lowrey is the wife of the absurd Jew owner of Vox.com, Ezra Klein.

She is a staff writer at The Atlantic, a job that she got due to her willingness to go deep on Jew dick. Because The Atlantic was the last major publication in America to be taken over by Jews, Jews have decided to make it the most Jewish publication ever. So they just print stuff from Jew-married irate women attacking patriarchal white men who care about truth and facts.

I do appreciate The Atlantic for putting me on the cover in an awesome painting someone made, which is going to ensure I can have my pick of the best women for the rest of my life.

The article that accompanied the cover is terrible but it is so terrible that no one is ever going to read past the second paragraph, so people can just assume that it goes on to say, “he’s an awesome badass.”

You read this attack on facts and think, “wow, that bitch is really mad about people on social media using facts to prove her to be objectively wrong.” Then you think, “well, I guess women probably like rants against those damn men and their damn facts and their belief that facts are more important than how someone feels.”

But it symbolizes something more than that.

What Lowrey is doing is endorsing the full frontal assault on the concept of objective truth, which is very soon going to be viewed with hostility by the mainstream. We’ve already seen this with the blacks, who claim that “objective truth” is a “white supremacist concept.”

The first time I saw this was back in the ancient world of 2017, when a bunch of blacks at Pomona College said that a conservative journalist who came to the college to report on Black Lives Matter was a white supremacist, and wrote a letter denouncing her, which included the passage:

Historically, white supremacy has venerated the idea of objectivity, and wielded a dichotomy of ‘subjectivity vs. objectivity’ as a means of silencing oppressed peoples. The idea that there is a single truth–’the Truth’–is a construct of the Euro-West that is deeply rooted in the Enlightenment, which was a movement that also described Black and Brown people as both subhuman and impervious to pain. This construction is a myth and white supremacy, imperialism, colonization, capitalism, and the United States of America are all of its progeny. The idea that the truth is an entity for which we must search, in matters that endanger our abilities to exist in open spaces, is an attempt to silence oppressed peoples.

Imagine a universe so Jewish that facts and truth itself were considered evil, and political positions were disqualified based explicitly on them being based in fact.

Well, that’s the universe you’re entering into: a complete Jewish paradise where lies are prized.

You will see a day when people are denounced publicly for “spreading truth.” In fact, that’s what this Annie Lowrey article is.

The Jew media has, for the time since the Alt-Right has been a thing, consistently attempted to frame us as skinhead/KKK members, who live in trailers and blah blah blah. This has resulted in most of the articles which are written about us featuring header images of the KKK or the NSM.

Sensing that the people are no longer buying this nonsense – as it hardly makes any sense when they also talk nonstop about how we use a cartoon frog as our movement logo – some Jew media outlets are attempting to do a bit more reflection on what exactly is going on.

One such Jew media outlet is Ezra Klein’s Vox, which recently posted an article entitled “Most of America’s hate groups are rooted in white supremacy,” where they attempt to uncover the true nature of rising pro-white movements.

They teamed with the chronically confused Jewish terrorist group the SPLC, so their analysis was as inept as you would expect.

From the article:

As much as the alt-right differs from traditional white supremacist groups organizationally, there is little difference when it comes to ideology.

The alt-right has benefited from a successful, ongoing public relations effort to rebrand various white supremacist and racist ideologies and graft them onto mainstream politics. But when compared side by side with other groups, the alt-right’s platform appears to just be age-old white supremacy served in a more palatable course.

With the help of SPLC, we gleaned each white supremacist group’s stated beliefs from public mission statements and literature, and gauged them against those of the alt-right. Note that these views reflect what leadership has expressed and may not represent the views of all members. (It is likely that many KKK members are sexist, for instance — but anti-feminism is not explicitly addressed in their ideology.)

This bungling analysis resulted in the following graph:

As someone who fits into at least three of these categories, this graph is highly offensive to me. I am whole-heartedly anti-black, anti-Moslem, anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic, anti-LGBTQ, anti-government AND anti-feminist.

Actually the “anti-government” one is a little bit confusing – I’m against the current government, but I’m not against the concept of governments. I don’t think anyone is actually against the concept of government, save for anarchists and extreme libertarians. So that is pretty much a stupid category to even include, unless they are talking about the current government, in which case, obviously all of these groups would be against it, as would the majority of American citizens, generally.

But this is goofy. For a number of reasons.

Firstly, it’s goofy to talk about all of these groups together, as the Alt-Right has millions of members, and the rest of them – if we decide they are all separate groups – have at most a few thousand. I know some people who identify as Christian Identity, but this is a group with at most a thousand people. I have never met anyone who belongs to the KKK, or even communicated with anyone online who has told me they’re a member.

The article uses SPLC data to claim that there are hundreds of these groups, which is obviously a lie.

Secondly, they aren’t all separate groups. Someone in the Alt-Right is necessarily a White Nationalist – as are members of any of these other groups. That is a general term for someone who believes whites should have their own countries. Most of the people in the Alt-right are pro-Nazi, in that they don’t believe in the lies about Hitler, and believe it would have been better if he had won the war.

That’s usually how the media defines “Neo-Nazis.” I am constantly called a Neo-Nazi, but I have never flown a swastika flag at a rally, dressed up in a Nazi uniform, or encouraged anyone to do that. If we’re talking about “Neo-Nazis” in terms of dressing up with swastikas, the only group I’m aware of that exists now that does this is the NSM, and they have I would assume only a couple hundred members. I don’t actually know much about them.

Also – what is the difference between a “Racist Skinhead” and a “Neo-Nazi”? I guess someone can be a Neo-Nazi without being a Racist Skinhead, but surely, all Racist Skinheads are also Neo-Nazis, are they not?

I mean – how goofy?

Thirdly, and most importantly, this checkbox thing is retarded. Virtually everyone I know, regardless of their choice of terminology by which they self-identify, is against all of those things (if we consider the above caveat relating to the term “anti-government”). There are a few people here and there who are soft on fags or feminism, but they are certainly an extreme minority in any pro-white movement.

Srsly Wat

I have no idea whether this article on Vox was a genuine attempt to understand rising pro-white sentiment in America, but if it was, it is one of the worst analytic failures I’ve ever come across.

One would imagine that the SPLC would have an interest in actually understanding what is going on, but they may simply be incapable of doing so. Or perhaps, they have some reason for spreading misinformation. Certainly they might consider it beneficial to lump together old stereotypical “hate groups” such as the KKK with more modern white movements. I don’t think that is beneficial, but I am able to see that they would think that.

Basically, the opposition is in a state of total disarray, scurrying about trying to do anything to stop the rising tide.

But they can’t do anything.

We won before we even started.

The evil Jew Ezra Klein, editor of Vox, published an article yesterday entitled “Donald Trump’s success reveals a frightening weakness in American democracy,” with the subheading, “Trump found a flaw in our political system, and we have no way to fix it.”

You can go read it if you want. It might be interesting to you if you’re like, in the process of studying the methods Jews use to manipulate goyim’s minds by exploiting emotional vulnerabilities.

But I can sum it up for you: “democracy is a problem because the goyim are bad and voting for things that Jews don’t like.”

Basically, it is an admission that a society where the will of the people is done is non-viable for Jews.

This isn’t dissimilar to the Brexit situation, where Jewish judges have declared that it may not even be valid. Because something something something democracy.

The Jews shoved this retarded system of democracy on us because they could use it to do their will. Now that they see that it is possible for us to use their own rules to do our will, they are saying that the rules must be changed, because the system is broken.

There is an eternal, ancient proverb which rings true.

But today, we have a chance to beat them. At their own game.

Make sure everyone you know votes for Trump. If they need rides, give them rides. Take the day off.

We will be broadcasting live with election night coverage.

Number one reason we need ISIS on the streets of America? Because Adolf Hitler turned millions of innocent kikes into lampshades, and we didn’t stop it from happening.

So says Vox.

Desperate people, fleeing a terrifying, bloodthirsty regime, try to find refuge in the US. But the American government and the public don’t want to accept them. They worry that accepting refugees would put citizens at risk, and they don’t see the refugee crisis as their problem to fix. So they are turned away.

This is what could happen in the US in 2015, if the governors and members of Congress pushing to stop the admission of Syrian refugees have their way. But it’s definitely what happened in 1939 to Jews fleeing Nazi Germany. The US (and other countries in the Western Hemisphere) could have saved thousands of Jews from the Nazis. They didn’t. At one point, the US literally turned away a ship of 900 German Jews. Shortly afterward, it rejected a proposal to allow 20,000 Jewish children to come to the US for safety.

Even though the ended 40 years before I was born, and my grandfather actually went and fought for these Jews, I am now personally responsible for the well-being of hordes of ISIS because of the Holocaust. Even though the Holocaust didn’t even actually happen.

If this doesn’t make sense to you, you’re an ignorant bigot.