It looks like this government that the West worked to install in Syria is actually evil.

We’re going to have to overthrow it again, it looks like.

But it should be really easy this time.

The Express Tribune:

Syria’s new rulers have unveiled changes to the national school curriculum, sparking widespread concern and protests.

The new curriculum, posted on the Ministry of Education’s Facebook page, reflects a marked shift toward Islamisation, omitting references to the Assad era and introducing controversial amendments.

Key changes include replacing the phrase “Defending the nation” with “Defending Allah,” a move seen as aligning education with a more religious outlook. Moreover, the curriculum has removed topics related to evolution and the Big Bang theory, while erasing references to ancient Syrian gods and the statues associated with them. The curriculum overhaul also downplays the legacy of Queen Zenobia, the legendary ruler of Palmyra.

Evolution and the Big Bang Theory are retarded. No one but monkeys believes that tripe.

The most significant changes, however, focus on the removal of content associated with former President Bashar al-Assad. Poems celebrating Assad and his father Hafez have been excised from Arabic language lessons, while the Syrian revolutionary flag has replaced the old regime’s flag in textbooks.

Despite the uproar, Education Minister Nazir al-Qadri has sought to downplay the significance of these changes. He stated that the curriculum would remain unchanged for now until specialised committees can review it. Al-Qadri further clarified that the revisions were limited to removing content that glorified the Assad regime and correcting “inaccuracies” in Islamic education.

While some Syrians have welcomed the removal of Assad-era content, the new curriculum’s shift towards a more Islamic identity has triggered alarm among civil society activists. Critics argue that the changes were implemented without broad societal consultation and fear that they signal a wider authoritarian move towards erasing Syria’s secular past.

Activists have called for protests ahead of the new school term, demanding that all sections of Syrian society be consulted before further changes are made to the educational system. They argue that such sweeping alterations to the curriculum reflect the new government’s top-down approach and undermine promises of inclusivity and national dialogue.

Slut rights are non-negotiable.

Assad gave sluts rights, and it ended badly for him

REPORTER: “Are you prepared to declare a national emergency with respect to climate change?”

BIDEN: “We’ve already done that”

REPORTER: “So you’ve already declared that national emergency?

BIDEN: “You have a bug on you!” 🤡
pic.twitter.com/edH1POl1GS

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 9, 2023

You know how you are making the world too hot by not eating bugs?

In history, people made the world too cold by… eating too many bugs. They should have been eating beef, to heat that bitch out so they didn’t freeze to death, but they were addicted to bugs. They were also paying too many taxes. The ancient government was like “yo, y’all ain’t gotta pay all this shit, bitch-ass,” but the population was like “no, we want to pay way, way more taxes.”

So they cooled the bitch down so low everyone died.

Of course, as we know now, the situation is in the reverse – the bitch is heating out, so we need to eat bugs and pay extreme taxes to chill it up.

It’s very, very simple: the weather fluctuates based on whether you eat bugs or beef, and how many taxes you pay.

Reuters:

Long before our species Homo sapiens trekked out of Africa, earlier human species also spread to other parts of the world. That dispersal, however, sometimes encountered grave hardships.

Scientists on Thursday described evidence of a massive North Atlantic cooling event about 1.1 million years ago that lasted roughly 4,000 years and appears to have wiped out the entire population of archaic humans who had colonized Europe.

Based on fossils from Spain, that species is believed to have been Homo erectus, generally considered the first member of the human evolutionary lineage to have expanded beyond Africa. The species was the first possessing body proportions like ours and made innovations in stone tools.

The frigid interval – comparable in intensity to the more recent ice ages – appears to have rendered Europe inhospitable for the bands of early human hunter-gatherers, as extreme glaciation deprived them of food resources. Their cold tolerance may have been lacking, without sufficient fat insulation, while fashioning effective clothing and shelter and finding the means to make fire would have been challenging, the researchers said.

“There was probably a complete interruption in the early human occupation of Europe, possibly for a considerable time, with an entirely new population eventually coming back,” said anthropologist Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London, a co-author of the research published in the journal Science.

How many perished in this regional extinction event remains unclear.

“We have little idea of population numbers, but certainly tiny by modern standards – probably at best in the tens of thousands across Europe,” Stringer said.

This occurred during the Pleistocene epoch, about 2.6 million to 11,700 years ago, marked by global cooling episodes.

“Contrary to previous beliefs, our study demonstrates that human occupation of Europe was not continuous, but rather punctuated by at least one regional climate-induced extinction,” said climate physicist and study co-author Axel Timmermann of Pusan National University in South Korea.

Frankly, I don’t even think this is real.

If you study these “prehistory” and “archaeology” people, you will find they just pull shit out of their asses constantly, then circle the wagons and all agree with each other. That really happens in every academic discipline, especially astrophysics, which is a big Jew joke.

But also, I mean… some asshole said that this piece of shit “Ulysses” was “the best novel ever,” and the yipping, mimicking apes all circled the wagon about that retarded claim.

It’s just important to point out how goofy this all is.

The global warming hoax is bigger than the Holocaust hoax.

At least in the Holocaust, people did go to camps.

They didn’t get killed in gas chambers by Nazis, but by typhus by God.

With global warming it’s like yo, it’s not even heating out this bitch? Y’all niggas said New York would be flooded by 2013, now you’re saying wildfires and hurricanes are not natural?

Scientist @curryja published research that fueled climate change alarmism.

“I was…treated like a rock star.”

Then she realized some of her research was wrong.

When she admitted it, the corrupt climate change industry attacked her.

Here she exposes how alarmism is REWARDED: pic.twitter.com/62ISCCvaGT

— John Stossel (@JohnStossel) August 8, 2023

New human, or just yet another skull from an extinct ape???

You decide!

BBC News:

Chinese researchers have unveiled an ancient skull that could belong to a completely new species of human.

The team has claimed it is our closest evolutionary relative among known species of ancient human, such as Neanderthals and Homo erectus.

Nicknamed “Dragon Man”, the specimen represents a human group that lived in East Asia at least 146,000 years ago.

It was found at Harbin, north-east China, in 1933, but only came to the attention of scientists more recently.

An analysis of the skull has been published in the journal The Innovation.

One of the UK’s leading experts in human evolution, Prof Chris Stringer from London’s Natural History Museum, was a member of the research team.

“In terms of fossils in the last million years, this is one of the most important yet discovered,” he told BBC News.

“What you have here is a separate branch of humanity that is not on its way to becoming Homo sapiens (our species), but represents a long-separate lineage which evolved in the region for several hundred thousand years and eventually went extinct.”

Artist’s impression of Homo Longi.

The researchers say the discovery has the potential to rewrite the story of human evolution. Their analysis suggests that it is more closely related to Homo sapiens than it is to Neanderthals.

They have assigned the specimen to a new species: Homo longi, from the Chinese word “long”, meaning dragon.

“We found our long-lost sister lineage,” said Xijun Ni, a professor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Hebei GEO University in Shijiazhuang.

He told BBC News: “I said ‘oh my gosh!’ I could not believe that it was so well preserved, you can see all the details. It is a really amazing find!”

The skull is huge compared with the average skulls belonging to other human species, including our own. Its brain was comparable in size to those from our species.

Dragon Man had large, almost square eye sockets, thick brow ridges, a wide mouth, and oversized teeth. Prof Qiang Ji, from Hebei GEO University, says it is one of the most complete early human skull fossils ever discovered.

“It has a mosaic combination of primitive and (more modern features), setting itself apart from all the other species of human,” the researcher explained.

The scientists believe that Dragon Man was powerfully-built and rugged. But little is known about how he lived, because his skull was removed from the site in which it was found.

That means that there is currently no archaeological context, such as stone tools, or other elements of culture.

The skull was reportedly discovered in 1933 by a construction worker helping build a bridge on the Songhua river running through Harbin, in Heilongjiang province, which translated means Black Dragon River, hence the new human’s name..

The city was under Japanese occupation at the time. Suspecting its cultural value, the Chinese worker smuggled it home, to keep it out of the hands of occupiers. He hid it at the bottom of his family’s well, where it remained for around 80 years. The man told his family about the skull before he died, which is how it eventually got into the hands of scientists.

“The researchers claim the form of ancient human on the far left may have evolved into the relatively modern Dragon Man on the far right over millions of years.”

Dragon Man joins a number of early human remains uncovered in China that have proven difficult to categorise. These include remains from Dali, Jinniushan, Hualongdong and the Xiahe jawbone from the Tibetan Plateau.

There has been a fierce debate about whether these remains represent primitive examples of Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, a human group called the Denisovans, or something else entirely.

Frankly, this stuff about “oh wow, we found a new evolutionary item” is generally not believable.

What is the difference between a “new human skull” and the skull of an extinct ape?

The answer tends to be “the eye of the beholder.”

I’ve said for the longest time that the theory of evolution must be racist, as it basically says that black people are the missing link between man and ape.

I mean, seriously – just look at them.

Everyone knows they look like apes.

Remember when they flipped out over the H&M ad that had a black child in the hoodie that read, “coolest monkey in the jungle”?

Or when they flipped out over that Australian Serena Williams cartoon?

Here’s the question: if liberals don’t know they look like apes, why are these things immediately offensive?

Clearly, everyone knows they look like apes, and the issue that liberals have is that you shouldn’t point that out, because it’s mean.

Now, the chickens are coming home to roost for Charles Darwin himself.

Daily Mail:

The Natural History museum is conducting a review into potentially ‘offensive’ collections including its Charles Darwin exhibitions.

In the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, museum bosses have ordered an audit into certain collections that some staff believe are ‘legacies of colonies, slavery and empire’.

Rooms, statues and collected items in the museum that could be ‘problematic’ may be renamed, relabelled, or removed.

The review into the museum’s links to slavery and colonialism could result in a potential overhaul of the museum’s collections and public spaces.

In documents seen by The Sunday Telegraph, museum staff were told that as a result of the Black Lives Matter protests, the museum would undertake a review of room names, statues and collections that ‘could potentially cause offence’.

The executive board of the Natural History museum is said to be ‘very engaged’ with the issue and circulated an academic paper to staff which claimed ‘science, racism, and colonial power were inherently entwined‘.

The paper proposes publicly acknowledging the past to create ‘less racist’ museums.

Collections under review include specimens of exotic birds gathered by naturalist Charles Darwin on his expedition to the Galapagos Island with Captain Robert FitzRoy on HMS Beagle in 1835.

I’m not personally the biggest believer in the theory of Darwinian evolution myself. Even with my skepticism, however, my biggest issue with it has always been that there isn’t any open debate. You’re not allowed to discuss it critically in universities, and the federal government effectively says that not teaching children that Darwinian evolution is a fact in public school is a violation of the Constitutional separation of church and state.

What I would want to see with the theory of evolution is what I want to see everywhere: free and open inquiry, and public debate. That is the opposite of tearing down museum exhibits because they offend people. I don’t think this should happen to any idea or theory, ever. Everything should be open. Allowing the free flow of ideas is the single and only path to enlightenment.

It should be extremely disturbing to see open attacks on science. Because you can tear down Darwin exhibits, sure. But if you’ve decided that “science is racist,” then it’s not going to be long before you have a situation where things stop working. Our society requires science to function.

Communism is defined by regressiveness: the society moves backward.

That is what we are seeing everywhere now.

The society is moving backwards, literally devolving, and that is being cheered on by the entire establishment, primarily the media and the government.

I wrote a thing about all of the various lies that have been told with regards to the wars in the Middle East, and the way people have just gone along with them, despite the clearly nonsensical nature of the various lines of reasoning, and the conflicting lines of reasoning (i.e., why are we gifting democracy to enemies who are planning to nuke us).

It is worth pointing out in the context of this “we will just believe whatever” nature of the population that human beings, white people in particular, are not evolved to recognize lies coming from authority figures.

Most of our mental processes happen in the subconscious mind. And for most people, the subconscious mind informs the conscious mind of what it should be doing, in the same way that the inner-workings of a computer inform the screen what it should be displaying. And our subconscious minds function on very old, hardwired programs which were never updated for modern technological civilization.

In the environment which we evolved, which was a tribal situation in the cold, the interests of the leadership would always overlap with the interests of the general population. What was good for the tribal chief and the tribal elders was good for the tribe and vise versa.

Furthermore, before the advent of economics, people in general had very little reason to lie to one another in any context, unless it was over some small human relational thing (primarily sexual intrigue, which is by no coincidence the thing that human beings remain the most suspicious of). The concept of leaders lying about a war would be unheard of, because the leader was the individual most certain to die if a war went wrong. So the hardware of people’s brains has no system wherein to register the idea that when someone says “these people are trying to kill us, we have to go fight them” that they are being untruthful and have some ulterior motive.

Furthermore, we have no biological context for televisions. Our subconscious minds register someone on a TV talking as a real person in the room talking to us, and register information based on that. This is why there was much more scrutiny of the First and Second World Wars than of the more recent wars. Our brains are telling us that these talking heads on TV are both authority figures and our personal friends, who visit our homes and sit in our living rooms and talk to us every day, and the mind does not have any context to place the concept that they are all lying in order to undermine society.

Finally, there is no neural context for the modern secular Jew, who has shaved his beard and taken off his hat and pretended to be a normal member of our society. When Jews had the beards and the hats, usually spoke another language amongst themselves, they could be registered by the brain as an “other,” and were thus treated much differently. It was always understood that they, as a separate group, had a separate agenda. An entire nation could quickly turn against them.

We now have a type of alien shapeshifter situation, which is why you have so many conservatives – who are in fact “racist” on some level, even though they’ve been trained to only express it in codewords – incapable of understanding the Jewish issue, even while they are against immigration, against black integration, etc.

Hopefully this understanding helps people to frame things better. It is easy to simply dismiss people as stupid, but then that becomes confusing when you realize that people who are objectively not stupid – people who are even very successful in business and their personal lives – are able to believe such ridiculous lies.

I don’t even know if I believe this is a tool at all, tbh. Just looks like rock.

I am a strong supporter of alternative ancient history views. Not necessarily because I absolutely agree with any specific alternative view specifically, so much as that I absolutely disagree with the mainstream narrative, which is presently barely being held together with duct tape and angry threats from Richard Dawkins.

So they come out with this sort of thing on the reg to reenforce it.

The Telegraph:

Archaeologists in Algeria have discovered stone tools and cut animal bones that may be up to 2.4 million years old, bringing into question East Africa’s title as the cradle of humanity, according to research published Thursday in the journal Science.

The artifacts – more ancient than those discovered in the region until now – were found in Setif, some 200 miles (300 kilometres) east of Algiers, by a team of international researchers, including Algerians.

The tools closely resemble those called Oldowan, found until now mainly in East Africa.

The tools were unearthed near dozens of fossilised animal bones which contained cut marks, as if relics of prehistoric butchers.

The bones came from animals including the ancestors of crocodiles, elephants and hippopotamuses.

“East Africa is widely considered to be the birthplace of stone tool use by our ancient hominid ancestors – the earliest examples of which date as far back as about 2.6 million years ago,” said the report in Science.

“The new findings make Ain Boucherit the oldest site in northern Africa with in situ evidence of hominin meat use with associated stone tools and they suggest that other similarly early sites could be found outside of the Eastern Africa Rift.”

No one actually believes that you can date a rock. Even if you follow the orthodoxy of Carbon atom counting, that can only date items going back 50,000 years.

The premise being presented here is that just a few hundred thousand years ago, modern humans were monkey people living in Africa. And they just take that starting point and fill in that story with whatever sort of thing they can think of. Whatever. Doesn’t really matter. They find an old rock in Africa “ah yes, this is a 2.6 million year old rock, used by monkey people.”

That isn’t to say that I don’t believe in “evolution” in a general sense. There’s not really a better way to explain why we have all these different animals on Earth.

I’m simply saying that you have a bunch of people that have devoted their lives to promoting a certain “story of history” and they thus have a vested interest in making sure that story remains the same.

Furthermore, you have Jews who have a vested interest in making the stupid goyim believe that their lives have no meaning and the only purpose of their existence is to consume products and do “gay sex.”

And key to that nihilistic view is this idea that there is a straight line from monkey people to Egypt to Rome to Hitler to multicultural hell, and that basically, the story of man is that of a monkey thinking he is human and then realizing he isn’t. The monkey thought his life had meaning, then he realized it didn’t.

And that understanding our lives are meaningless was a great leap in evolution.

If they came out with a bomb-drop like “actually, a million years ago there was a global empire using a form of high technology to build megalithic monuments across the planet because they believed they were in touch with a divine parallel dimension,” then you’re gonna have a lot of people rethinking this whole “I only exist to have orgasms” theory.

You can say whatever you want about new age conspiracy theorist alternative historians. I don’t think they are right about everything, and I agree they are weird, but they are presenting a critique that isn’t even acknowledged as having been made because no one can explain any of it.

We’re supposed to believe that all of these gigantic stone structures all over the planet were built coincidentally by separate civilizations of blacks or other sorts of monkey people. And that just doesn’t make any sense, bud.

Furthermore, I think that there are certainly stone structures all across the floor of the oceans, and we are not being allowed to look into this, because no one with the resources wants to look into it, because the last thing that archaeologists, historians, anthropologists, Jewish bankers, feminists, homosexuals and atheist ideologues want is to discover Atlantis is real.

I think Graham Hancock is the best of the new age alt-history guys.

Here’s a more recent interview.

He’s not perfect.

He’s like the archeological version of Rupert Sheldrake.

This Sheldrake talk was to the Electronic Universe people – they’re also quite good, in a totally separate field.

Another massive fraud situation, with the entrenched scientific establishment shilling their own careers at the expense of the truth.

If you start putting together Graham Hancock, Rupert Sheldrake and Electric Universe, you’re looking at an entire new reality with an entire new role for mankind… in an electronic universe. 

There are a lot of interesting guys on YouTube. I don’t really read very many books anymore, so I don’t know what’s going on in that scene, but when I did read books I read Hancock’s and the first several were quite good. The one about psychedelic drugs sort of jumped the shark.

Anyway, look.

These theory guys are just trying to figure things out in a situation where we’ve just been buried by idiot nonsense, primarily by the Jews.

It’s not just politics, economics and the social order: the entire reality is kiked.

Time to get woke.

The Daily Show, which is apparently still on with this completely unfunny South African mulatto, stole my bit on the Trump Nigger Tape.

I have been saying since the first mention of such a tape that it would turn into a meme and cause the population of America to start saying “the n-word” all the time.

I have made a very strong argument that Trump supporters get permission from Trump as THE LEADER for what they are and are not allowed to say and think.

I have not heard anyone else give this specific analysis, meaning the writers of this show – who have to keep very much on the edge of things to make this foreign mulatto seem funny – are reading this site to get their bits.

Huffington Post:

“The Daily Show” correspondent Roy Wood Jr. explained exactly why he definitely does not want an alleged recording of President Donald Trump using a racial slur to be released.

On Wednesday’s episode, Wood noted that “whenever Trump crosses a line, it only emboldens people to follow him.”

…

“The last thing we need is his supporters hearing him say the N-word, ’cause then the floodgates open, we’re going to hear Trump supporters using that word everywhere,” Wood added. “They’re going to turn this world upside down.”

The correspondent Roy Wood Jr., as you can see in the above clip, is an American negro and actually does the bit pretty funnily.

The reason that American negroes are funny and watching this South African negro is like watching goats graze is because American negroes have developed “shuck and jive,” a specific form of negro behavior meant to endear them to white people.

Wikipedia:

Shuckin’ and jivin’ (or shucking and jiving) is a slang term for the behavior of joking and acting evasively. More generally, the term can also refer to the speech and behavioral mechanisms adopted in the presence of an authoritative figure. Shuckin’ and jivin’ usually involves clever lies and impromptu storytelling, used to one-up an opponent or avoid punishment. In Ribbin’, Jivin’, and Playin’ the Dozens: The Persistent Dilemma in Our Schools, Herbert L. Foster writes: “Shuckin’ and jivin’ is a verbal and physical technique some blacks use to avoid difficulty, to accommodate some authority figure, and in the extreme, to save a life or to save oneself from being beaten physically or psychologically.”

That is to say that American blacks, as an underclass – first literal slaves, then second-class citizens – developed a method of entertaining whitey in order to gain favor with them.

This is a social adaptation, and may even be a biological adaptation that is specific to American blacks – a very specific skill which other blacks from various global regions (they are everywhere) do not possess. It is the single reason that black comedians are funny to white people – because they have developed a method of entertaining white people.

Dave Chappelle is probably the best modern example of this phenomenon.

Chris Rock too.

Both comedians integrated self-criticism of their own race into their comedy, which makes white people even more comfortable with them.

It is not hard to see how this behavior would be beneficial. During slavery, the one who could make the master laugh with physical comedy and exaggerated, outrageous gestures would be preferred by the master. He might even be brought in as entertainment for dinner parties and such, just as we, as white people, will turn on black comedy shows for entertainment.

If the black is entertaining, he is offering a lot more value than some mopey nigger that just grunts and picks cotton. Someone who makes you laugh is always more pleasant to be around than someone who does not, and you are always going to feel more favorable to them. The funny slave would then get better food, fewer work hours and – get this – his pick of the female slaves.

And that is how it could be biological. The slave master would let the funny slave bang whichever of the female slaves he wanted, thus transferring the shuck and jive gene.

In the post slavery era, the funny ones would have also gotten better jobs and higher status, and then also more breeding opportunities.

Even now, it is financially beneficial for a black man to be entertaining to whites. No one wants a big scary mean stupid negro hanging around – so if you have to have negroes around, you’re going to pick the funny ones.

Furthermore, modern rap music that is sold to white people is also a form of shuckin and jivin.

It’s also why Muhammed Ali was popular with whites.

So, I was not surprised by Comedy Central’s choice to replace the “looks huwhyte to me” Jew Jon Stewart Liebowitz with a diversity hire. What I was very surprised by is that they chose to replace him with a negro who does not have the shuck and jive adaptation and thus is not funny.

In the clip at the top of the page, when you see the non-American negro switch to the random shuck and jive negro, you’re like “this show would be funnier if that other negro was hosting it.”

It’s a very interesting concept, this negro ability to entertain white people, and the exuberance with which they perform the act. Alleged “negro intellectuals” resent this, because they apparently understand what it is… but there aren’t very many alleged negro intellectuals, are there? The individual quoted in the above Wiki quote, Herbert L. Foster, is actually Jewish, however. So I can only imagine that it was a Jew who chose the unfunny, non-shucker, non-jiver mulatto Trevor Noah to host the Daily Show, presumably to try to acclimate whites to the idea of negro funnymen as something other than shuckers and jivers.

Noah attempts to do the same type of Jewish comedy that Jon Stewart did, and fails miserably. It’s incredible that he is still on the air.

Stephen Colbert’s Comedy Central show also had a negro, Larry Wilmore, who – though American – does not shuck or jive replace him.

He was even worse, as he tried to pretentiously talk down to white people. That is something that, consciously or unconsciously, not even the shittiest of shitlibs are interested in.

Wilmore’s show was canceled in 2016 after a 68% drop in viewership.

Noah experienced a 38% drop.

Anyway, this is interesting information, I believe, which could be useful for future understandings of race relations in America.

Because it is the main reason that white Americans tend to feel some sympathy for negroes. If they were all just purely the standard violent psychopaths we report about here on the Daily Stormer – scary, monster creatures – there would virtually no sympathy.

That is to say: the shuck and jive adaptation has been extremely evolutionarily advantageous to the negro. So we cannot say they didn’t evolve. At least a portion of them did evolve – into cartoons, which are capable of garnering sympathy from whites due to their entertainment value.

Yes, this is a true story. Scientists believe they’ve found monkeys that are more advanced than blacks who belong to the Niggerus Maximus branch of the great ape family.

New Scientist:

Another non-human primate has entered the Stone Age – the fourth type known to have done so. One population of white-faced capuchins living in Panama routinely use stones to smash open nuts and shellfish. Other nearby populations don’t make use of stone tools, which might suggest that primates – perhaps including our ancestors – stumble into the stone age by chance.

Chimpanzees in west Africa, macaques in Thailand and several species of tufted, strongly built capuchin monkeys living in South America use stone tools …

Now, most people have always known that niggers are the least civilized of all the ape species.

But to have their civilizational achievements matched by Capuchin monkeys still living in the South American rainforest is something else.

Jokes aside, the article is actually a bit disappointing. Most of it’s behind a paywall and the premise, I think, is flawed.

Crows are in the stone-age by the measure that these scientists are using. They’ve got regional dialects and can fashion tools like hooks with their beaks. This is also more than many Gen Z tide pod-eaters will ever be able to do.

I don’t think being able to use stone tools is enough of a “stone age” measure.

Perhaps cave-paintings though? Something to show abstract thought taking place.

But that being said, I can’t draw for shit and some of these paintings are actually quite good.

At least I have great WPM, come at me caveman.

Most Arts majors cannot paint this well either, seeing as modern art doesn’t take any skill.

So yeah, problematic stuff, the whole stone age question. Significant swaths of our society don’t even measure up to caveman standards anymore.

That’s what happens when you import the stone world and let stoners dictate your culture.

Which, I’m not even against living more naturally, and closer to nature.

But at that point, its gotta be an Archeofuturist deal. Trad societies with beneficial tech, but with the negative side-effects of that tech closely curtailed.

Anyways, I feel bad for the white-faced Capuchin tribe.

Soon they’ll have a long-nosed Capuchin tribe move in to live with them and start telling them to interbreed with other chimps and to feel guilty for their white faces.

Better that they stay in the stone age and off the radar until at least one great ape species figures out how to deal with the long-nose tribe.

Satoshi Kanazawa makes several good points on why East Asians are unlikely to make massive advancements in science (they’re smart, however not creative so they can really just assimilate already existing technology and ideas into their mass) and why censorship on college campuses will kill off all progress.

The only way to fix this problem is removing the Jews in academia.

Based and woke

There comes a point when evidence is so insurmountable that even cucks need to acknowledge a theory is bogus.

Case in point, an article from the Guardian regarding Neanderthals. It doesn’t really offer anything most white nationalists already didn’t know but in the last paragraph David Reich, the scientist who discovered all non-Africans contain Neanderthal DNA, made a startling admission.

The Guardian:

Instead of a tree, a better metaphor [for tracing human origins] would be a trellis, branching and remixing far back into the past, says Reich, whose work indicates that the idea of race is a very fluid, ephemeral concept. However, he is adamant that it is a very real one and takes issue with those geneticists who argue that there are no substantial differences in traits between populations.

It’s about time! It only took approximately 89 years from when (((Franz Boas))), a kike physicist (and, bizarrely, anthropologist) with no background in biology, unequivocally stated “race is a social construct.”

Boas engaged in nepotism by actively discriminating against non-Jews, was hired by the Dillingham Commission to measure the heads and bodies of immigrants and those of their children to examine “the physical assimilation of immigrant races.” His “research” was the catalyst that began the slow change of the US from majority white to a majority minority dystopia.

Hmm, putting a rootless cosmopolitan in charge of determining whether immigration was a good or bad thing, what could go wrong?

Boas was, of course, being intellectually dishonest. We had taxonomic classifications of species back then (it’s existed since the time of Aristotle in fact), so even if the scientists of those days had no means of studying genetic data to back up claims, Boas could have used basic methodology to illustrate that blacks and humans are not the same species. It wasn’t just outward differences (e.g. skin color) but also things they could measure such as skull shape, cranial capacity, bone density and IQ.

“This is a strategy that we scientists can no longer afford and that in fact is positively harmful,” he argues. Plenty of traits show differences between populations: skin colour, susceptibility to disease, the ability to breath at high altitudes and the ability to digest starch. More to the point, uncovering these differences is only just beginning. Many more will be discovered over the decades, Reich believes. Crucially, we need to be able to debate the implications of their presence at varying levels in different populations. That is not happening at present and that has dangerous implications.

It’s dangerous because people who have been forced to drink the diversity Kool-Aid will suddenly question why we’re giving hairless bipeds with the power of speech the same rights and privileges as functioning, rational human beings.

Preserving the white race will become less an issue of “perpetuating white privilege” and more an issue of conservation – we’re ensuring an endangered species is brought back from the brink and given the means to survive in their natural environment. It will totally change the nature of the debate from a social issue to an environmental issue.