Jews are the richest and most powerful people on earth by a virtually unbelievable margin. However, we can’t let that distract us from the fact that they are also somehow the most oppressed people on earth.

In a shocking and confounding twist, the degree to which they are oppressed is equal to the degree of their overwhelming wealth and influence.

Because they are so oppressed, we must obey their every command. That means if they tell you to vote a certain way, you vote that way, or you’re no better than the Germans who turned them into dishwashing fluid during the Hall of Cost.

Deutsche Welle:

Eight Holocaust survivors have urged young people to shun far-right parties and vote to protect democracy at the upcoming European Union elections.

“For millions of you, the European elections are the first election in your lives. For many of us, it could be the last,” read the open letter, presented in Berlin on Tuesday.

“We couldn’t stop it back then. But you can today,” the eight authors wrote.

Pictures of the 8 holocaust survivors, from the time when they were being holocausted

The letter was published by rights group Avaaz and signed by eight men and women aged between 81 and 102 who witnessed the Holocaust first-hand.

Someone who’s 81-years-old today would’ve been around 2 when the war ended.

How do toddlers survive death camps run by people who want to exterminate their entire kind?

Why does no one ask how that’s possible?

“I know that there was a similar development back then as there is today: a weak democratic government and a party that rallied the people who were dissatisfied,” 99-year-old Walter Frankenstein said in a video statement.

“That’s why young people today cannot just say ‘Yes, I don’t know who to vote for, so I’d rather not go at all.’ That’s the worst thing you can do. Our democracy must be defended again and again.”

…

Ruth Winkelmann, who hid from the Nazis in a shed with her mother and sister after her father was deported to the Auschwitz concentration camp, said she signed the letter “because the AfD is becoming too strong.”

She told the AFP news agency that the far-right party has “quite a lot in common” with the Nazis in the 1930s.

“As a democrat, you should recognize everyone, whether green, white or black, it doesn’t matter. Whether you’re short or tall, you can live together and have respect for everyone,” she said.

What about the Palestinians?

I mean, I hate to even have to ask that question, because it almost feels unfair, but seriously, Jew: what about the Palestinians? 

I’m still waiting for this to pay off

There’s been nonstop political violence against the German right for years now. The government has encouraged it, or at least not condoned it.

All of a sudden it’s bad?

Deutsche Welle:

German police said on Monday said that investigators had identified three more suspects after an attack on the European lawmaker Matthias Ecke and a Green Party campaign worker in Dresden.

Ecke, a member of the European parliament for Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democrats (SPD), was set upon by four attackers as he displayed EU election posters in Dresden on Friday night, according to the police.

How the investigation has proceededAfter a 17-year-old had already turned himself in, the apartments of three other suspects were searched.

During the investigation, two additional suspects were initially identified and their apartments were searched early on Sunday evening on the orders of the Dresden District Court.

A fourth suspect was identified on Sunday, whose apartment was also searched late in the evening. Investigators said evidence was confiscated and was now being evaluated. All four are said to be aged either 17 or 18.

…

The investigators were said to have tracked down the three other suspects by evaluating evidence that was confiscated from the one who confessed. Police on Sunday said the 17-year-old who initially came forward had no previous criminal record, and had so far “not commented on the motive for the offence.”

Media reports suggested that right-wing extremist leanings were found in the first suspect’s home.

A spokesperson for the state criminal investigation office later said there was reason to believe one of the suspects has right-wing views.

Politically motivated violence in GermanyOn Monday, Ecke shared a picture of his injuries on X, formerly Twitter, showing a black eye and his cheek swollen with a plaster.

“This is not just about me, but about everyone who is politically active out of passion. In a democracy, nobody should have to fear speaking their mind!” he wrote.

Chancellor Scholz condemned the attack, saying it was a threat to democracy. On Monday, the German Interior Ministry said interior ministers of Germany’s 16 states would hold an extraordinary meeting on Tuesday to discuss measures to counter attacks on politicians.

…

In response to the violence, thousands of demonstrators gathered in the streets of Dresden and Berlin on Sunday to protest right-wing extremism and political violence.

Yes, of course.

Big crowd of pro-government activists.

Pro-government activism is very popular in Germany.

Nobody in this picture should have the right to vote

Man, these European elections take forever.

But here you have it.

That’s across the entire continent.

Here’s who voted for the two big “moderate” parties, which had held the majority and no longer do.

Here are the countries that voted for the “far-right” and populists.

The far left did significantly better than the far right.

Turnout was better this year than for the last elections in 2014, but not by very much – and it was still mostly irrelevant countries that had high turnouts, probably because these elections are irrelevant, given that they do not do anything specific.

Germany voted a lot because Germans believe in this nonsense. UK didn’t vote much, probably because they aren’t even supposed to be in this election.

Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party won most of the votes in the UK.

That could be viewed as a “second referendum” in itself. But it won’t be viewed that way.

Nigel will have a seat in the EU parliament, obviously.

Well done to our 4 MEPs in the South East!

It's time to change politics for good. pic.twitter.com/jslpPkj9hm

— The Brexit Party (@brexitparty_uk) May 27, 2019

UKIP on the other hand lost all seats. Which means that neither Sargon of Akkad nor Tommy Robinson will be attending this parliament.

Sargon of Akkad got just 3.2% of the vote, which shows either that these elections are totally rigged or the British people are simply stupid.

This chart showing the full makeup of the new EU parliament may also help you wrap your mind around the shape of things to come – the literal horseshoe.

We’ll see if the horseshoe theory holds true and those far leftists share the values of the right-wing nationalists. The spoiler is that they will not.

In Germany, AfD did better than last time, but still only got 10.8% of the vote. Merkel’s CDU did worse, but still got the largest percentage at 28.5%.

Germany, Infratest dimap 9:53 pm CEST projection:

CDU/CSU-EPP: 28.3%
GRÜNE-G/EFA: 20.3%
SPD-S&D: 15.6%
AfD-EFDD: 10.8%
LINKE-LEFT: 5.4%
FDP-ALDE: 5.4%
PARTEI-NI: 2.4%
FW-ALDE: 2.1%
TIER-LEFT: 1.4%
ÖDP-G/EFA: 1%
VOLT-*: 0.8%
FAMILIE-ECR: 0.7%
…#Europawahl2019 #EP2019 pic.twitter.com/JXwMQwEkDH

— Europe Elects (@EuropeElects) May 26, 2019

In Greece, Golden Dawn dropped off, going from 9.4% in 2014 to 4.8% this year.

Greece, European election Results (22.7% counted):

ND-EPP: 33.3%
SYRIZA-LEFT: 23.9%
KINAL-S&D: 7.2%
KKE-NI: 5.8%
XA-NI: 4.8%
EL-ENF: 4.0%
MeRA25-LEFT: 3.1%
PE-*: 1.7%
Potami-S&D: 1.5% #EP2019 #Ευρωεκλογές2019 pic.twitter.com/M8TN49qjL5

— Europe Elects (@EuropeElects) May 26, 2019

The best news is that Matteo Salvini’s Lega party won a majority. This is the first time they’ve won a national election.

That is a referendum on physically removing immigrants and stopping boats and it’s the best news of the week.

In France, National Front also won, beating the party of Emmanuel Macron… which I don’t think was hard to do.

That’s her on the left – RN (because for some reason she’s running as National Rally, which in French is called “Rally National”).

So: Farage, Salvini and Le Pen all won.

Not bad, not bad.

It was recently announced that Future King of Britain Sargon of Akkad was under investigation by the Joke Police for making a joke.

Aside from rape and mocking the Holocaust, I’m not sure what Carl Benjamin stands for – but I like it. 

UKIP’s official platform, which Sargon helped write, is for sure very good.

I’m glad to see MILO on board as well. He really got the short end of the cock when he was pushed out of the media by an outrage hoax and replaced with the anti-white shill Jordan Peterson.

BuzzFeed’s Mark Di Stefano is completely obsessed with Sargon, and has been compulsively trying to bring him down.

His Twitter feed is 24/7 SargonWatch, peppered with gay shit about the quadroon prince.

Now that is an historic image. pic.twitter.com/dJVNYnJqo1

— Mark Di Stefano 🤙🏻 (@MarkDiStef) May 8, 2019

Di Stefano has all the deets on the new dark alliance between Sargon and MILO.

BuzzFeed:

YouTuber Carl Benjamin’s controversial and chaotic bid to win a seat in the European Parliament will take another turn on Thursday, when far-right troll Milo Yiannopoulos joins him on the campaign trail.

Two days after police revealed they are investigating Benjamin for talking about raping the Labour MP Jess Phillips in a YouTube video, UKIP’s most prominent candidate is scheduled to appear with Yiannopoulos in the southwest of England for the first of a series of public events around the UK.

Yiannopoulos is a British former technology journalist who became a star in ultraconservative circles in the US as an editor at Steve Bannon’s Breitbart News. In 2017, a BuzzFeed News investigation revealed that Yiannopoulos had played a key role in introducing extremist white nationalist ideas into the mainstream of American politics in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

In a Google Hangout between the pair posted on YouTube on Monday night, Yiannopoulos confirmed he was flying to the UK to campaign alongside Benjamin.

Taking questions from his social media followers, Yiannopoulos at one point joked that he could turn up to one of the campaign stops “dressed as Jess Phillips” to “troll” the UKIP candidate.

“Sorry to break it to you but owing to your recent behaviour, I’ve become your reasonable, common-sense friend,” Yiannopoulos said.

He added: “I’m going to be able to place you in historical, literary, journalistic context as a product of the times. You are a function and a product of a crazy moment in culture.”

Yiannopoulos, who is from the UK, has spent much of his career in the US, where his extreme views resulted in bans by major platforms including Twitter and Facebook. In one instance, Yiannopoulos resigned from Breitbart and lost a book deal after a video emerged of him talking about sexual relationships between adults and teenagers. Yiannopoulos denied that he was defending pedophilia.

He definitely was not “defending pedophilia.” He was explaining that homosexuals regularly engage in pederasty with teenage boys, something that in every other context, the media supports.

Jew Allen Ginsburg, a hero of the left, was a member of NAMBLA and publicly shilled nonstop for the legalization of sex with pre-pubescent boys.

That Jew was invited to speak at Harvard and every other school, and was hanging out with major celebrities up until his death.

So don’t even tell me that the Jews are super-offended by pederasty.

We know that this outrage hoax was a complete hoax, because the video that “emerged” when the media attacked him had “emerged” from a public YouTube page, and had hundreds of thousands of views. Furthermore, I and many others had posted clips of him talking about pederasty, and everyone knew this about him – he is an honest fag who actually talks about what fags do.

Furthermore, we know for a fact that this was a conspiracy, because the day before it happened, someone from one of the journalist email groups – all mainstream journalists are in email groups to ensure they maintain a shared narrative on every topic – posted on /pol/ that it was going to come down on MILO in a “pedophilia” hoax.

They successfully got him banned from CPAC and fired from Breitbart, and basically his whole career collapsed.

It’s funny that I was against MILO four years ago, and now I’m wishing he would return.

In my own defense, before the rise of Jordan Peterson, I don’t think anyone had any idea how bad things could get.

But I should have known that when Shapiro turned against MILO, it could only mean that MILO was the best we were going to get.

Right now, MILO has no outlet whatsoever. He does have fans, but he has no way to connect with them. He recently had a tour canceled and was then banned from Australia.

Before that, he was featured on Alex Jones, selling magic pills. But AJ can’t support anyone now, due to his own shutdown.

MILO was planning on being a sort of mainstream figure, who was allowed to be in the debate, and it looked like some mainstream people were willing to allow that. But then they pulled the rug and shut him down, then shoved Jordan Peterson and his boatload of incomprehensible gobbledygook down our throats.

Sargon’s pivot into politics in light of the coming shutdown of his YouTube channel was brilliant. Now he’s going to get some kind of protection under British law against getting kicked off the internet.

Here, reproduced below, is yet another hallucinatory emission of Judaic supremacist hot air, this time from Mrs. Rodan-Benzaquen, director of the AJC Paris office, and Mr. Daniel Schwammenthal, the director of the AJC Transatlantic Institute in Brussels.

In their article in the Wall Street Journal, “Do Jews Have a Future in Europe?,” they can’t make up their minds whether their villainous ideological rivals doubt the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz, or celebrate their operation. They simultaneously decry a “demonstration in January this year, of some 17,000 people in the streets of Paris….participants wound up chanting…’the gas chambers were fake;” and: “…demonstrators at so-called ‘pro-Palestinian’ rallies scream slogans like “Hamas, Hamas, Jews into the gas,’ as has frequently happened around Europe.”

Do the two alleged groups of opposing “anti-semities” clash in the open, with one gang chanting “gas chambers fake” and the other, “Jews into the gas”? The authors have such a low opinion of the intelligence of their readers they don’t even attempt to reconcile the contradiction. Hence, we can only deduce from the lucid prose of Rodan-Benzaquen and Schwammenthal, that most “anti-semites” in Europe both doubt the gas chambers and exult in their existence, depending on their mood and the theme of their demonstration.

Moreover, the authors classify opponents of Zionism and Talmudic racism as “anti-Semites,” and they expect that American readers of the Wall Street Journal will cheer the government bureaucrats who ban the meetings of these cretinous “antis,” as in this paragraph:

“Laurent Louis — until last month a member of parliament…organized a conference to unite French and Belgian anti-Semites, which the Belgian authorities canceled at the last minute.”
Wow, what a close call! The meeting was only stopped by righteous Belgium authorities “at the last minute.” Imagine if the “democratic” Belgian authorities had foolishly permitted this horrible meeting? Apocalypse!”

Rodan-Benzaquen and Schwammenthal’s essay does not take into account Israeli butchery of Palestinians and Lebanese, or the powerful presence in the Israeli government and media of advocates of anti-goyimism. They won’t even acknowledge Robert Faurisson’s doctoral degree from the Sorbonne and his professorship. He is referred to only as “Robert Faurisson.” Dishonesty and partisanship permeates their writing.

The public in the West are not allowed to conceive of the reality of anti-goyimites in power in the Israeli state. Goyim (i.e. gentiles whether European, Persian or Arab) are so marginalized that racist attacks on them by powerful rabbis and Israeli politicians, emanating from Orthodox Judaism’s sacred texts, don’t register as formal and organized bigotry, or more precisely, as anti-goyimism.

The one-sided assumption inherent in the kind of writing the Wall Street Journal publishes on a daily or weekly basis is that Judaic persons are the saints and martyrs of the cosmos, and revulsion at the racist praxis of rabbis and Israelis who happen to be Judaic is a perpetually occuring crime of irrationality and bigotry. Meanwhile, Talmudic-fueled Zionist hatred and derision for Arabs and Christians, backed by the genocidal armed forces of the Israeli state, are almost never under consideration as either an urgent issue or a moral crisis.

Here now for the world to observe is the Talmudic mentality in action: the endless victim/martyr status and the calls for continued use of police and the courts to silence the less than human victims of The Holy Victims.

A question: how is it that such pitiable, persecuted, eternally victimized people have such influence on the police and the courts of Britain and Europe, and the media of the United States?

From Wall Street Journal:

Just ahead of last month’s European Parliament elections, which saw the rise of far-right and anti-Semitic parties, four people were murdered in the Jewish Museum of Brussels. The shootings underscored that, in addition to political extremism, Europe’s Jews also face the violent threat of jihadists.

Mehdi Nemmouche, a French Muslim, was arrested on suspicion of carrying out the attack. He appears to have been radicalized in prison, and is believed to have fought for Islamist rebels in Syria. Like Mohamed Merah, who murdered three soldiers, three Jewish children and a Rabbi two years ago in France, Mr. Nemmouche appears to have mixed gangsterism with radical Islam, anti-Semitism and hatred of the West.

With roughly 1,000 European fighters like Mr. Nemmouche estimated to be in Syria, European Union officials are working to devise better strategies for combating radicalization and detecting the movements of people to and from Syria.

But Europe’s Jews also face almost daily attacks—both verbal and physical. In France, home to Europe’s largest Jewish community of about 650,000, the situation is particularly severe, with 170 anti-Semitic acts reported by the Paris-based Jewish Community Protection Service (SPCJ) and the French Ministry of the Interior in the first trimester of 2014 alone. According to the French League of Human Rights, nearly 50% of all racist acts in France are anti-Semitic, even though Jews represent only 1% of the population.

Such attacks take place in the context of an extremely charged public debate. French comedian Dieudonné has managed not only to popularize an openly anti-Semitic discourse, but to forge the most unlikely of alliances. Though his father is from Cameroon, Dieudonné has united behind him individuals from the extreme right such as Alain Soral, a self-described “national-socialiste intellectual,” National Front founder Jean-Marie le Pen and Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson. Meanwhile, Dieudonné’s fan base has deep roots in France’s immigrant communities. Whatever else may divide the likes of Mr. le Pen and Dieudonné’s legions of admirers, they are united by their animosity toward Jews and the Jewish state.

In nearby Belgium, Laurent Louis — until last month a member of parliament — is trying to reproduce Dieudonné’s mass appeal. In early May, Mr. Louis organized a conference to unite French and Belgian anti-Semites, which the Belgian authorities canceled at the last minute.

Government attempts to silence Dieudonné and his followers by prohibiting his shows have failed, largely thanks to the Internet. Dieudonné’s anti-Jewish YouTube diatribes receive millions of viewers within hours of uploading. The authorities can ban events but not sentiments. Take one demonstration in January this year, of some 17,000 people in the streets of Paris. Officially meant as a general anti-government protest, hundreds of participants wound up chanting “Jews out of France” and “the gas chambers were fake.”

This environment leaves many in the Jewish community, perhaps for the first time since they rebuilt their homes in Europe after the Holocaust, fearing once again for their security and future. Fortunately, some European leaders have begun to grasp the depth of the problem. As French philosopher Albert Camus said: “To give things their correct name is to put the world right a bit.” In that sense, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls has started to put France right.

“Today exists a new form of anti-Semitism that is born in our suburbs,” he said in a radio interview in July 2012. He was referring to young Muslims, as apartment blocks outside French city centers typically house large immigrant communities. At the same time he warned “not to stigmatize fellow citizens notably of Muslim faith.” Mr. Valls went further two years later, in March this year, at a rally against anti-Semitism in Paris. The old anti-Semitism of the French extreme right “is renewed,” he said. “It feeds off hate for Israel. It feeds off anti-Zionism. Because anti-Zionism is an invitation to anti-Semitism.”

Indeed, anti-Semitism in Europe has taken new forms and comes from different segments of society. There is the extreme right with their traditional focus on race and Holocaust denial; the radical left, who seek to demonize Israel; and, as Mr. Valls hinted, there is a problem among some Muslim immigrants. Their motivation is little studied and thus little understood.

The simplistic notion, though, that their anti-Jewish acts are triggered by the Arab-Israeli conflict is just that—simplistic. It also risks rationalizing criminal behavior. The reality is that the problem of anti-Semitism has long become structural. After Merah’s murders in 2012, for example, anti-Jewish attacks in France skyrocketed 58%, according to the SPCJ, independent of the relatively quiet situation between Israelis and Palestinians.

So what can governments and civil society in Europe do to combat anti-Semitism? First, we need more leaders such as Mr. Valls speaking the truth and showing zero tolerance. When demonstrators at so-called “pro-Palestinian” rallies scream slogans like “Hamas, Hamas, Jews into the gas,” as has frequently happened around Europe, political leaders and the media can not stay silent. Public hate speech must not be tolerated and anti-Semitic acts need to be systematically prosecuted and punished.

Second, not all expressions of anti-Semitism should be fought with the same weapons. Regarding the Muslim community, for example, improving social cohesion is key. Better integrating Muslim Europeans is not only a virtue and a necessity in itself, it can also help lower the susceptibility of these communities to anti-Semitism and radicalization.

It is equally important to empower moderate Muslims. People such as Latifa Ibn Ziaten, whose son Imad was one of the French soldiers murdered by Merah, and who now visits France’s most difficult neighborhoods, speaking to youth groups and trying to steer them away from the influences of anti-Semites and extremists. There are many other such voices—Muslim entrepreneurs, writers, media personalities, students with the moral courage to confront the extremists within their communities. Let’s support their work and help build their networks.

Third, more needs to be done early on in the process, before people develop anti-Semitic views. New educational programs ought to focus on this problem, assisting students to recognize prejudices. Youngsters need to learn about the culture, history and religion of other communities, by focusing on similarities and shared values.

Fourth, fighting anti-Semitism at home may also have a foreign-policy dimension. To this day, Saudi and Qatari money is pouring into European mosques, helping to spread an extremist form of Islam. In addition, we know that through satellite television and the Internet, Islamist and anti-Semitic content can easily be accessed in Europe. Much of it is unfortunately produced in the Arab world. The EU recently introduced the “more-for-more principle,” offering stronger partnerships to neighboring countries that make more progress toward democratic reforms. Ending anti-Jewish, anti-Christian and anti-Western hate speech should become part of this bargain.

Much is at stake. Anti-Semitism is always symptomatic of a more profound problem in society, something that might start with Jews but will not stop there. So it is not just the well-being and future of the Jewish community in Europe that is at risk, but the very values Europe stands for.

Mrs. Rodan-Benzaquen is the director of the AJC Paris office and Mr. Schwammenthal is the director of the AJC Transatlantic Institute in Brussels.

UKIP’s EFD group presently has six official member parties and the Wilders/Le Pen group EAF presently has five official member parties. Both need to have members from at least seven different nations to receive a share of funding.

There are still fifty five MEPs who are still officially unaffiliated. It was reported in the media that Alternative For Deutschland’s [AfD] seven MEPs were joining the Tory group instead of EFD. However, AfD now says they have not decided.

Some of the parties that may join either EFD or EAF include Alternative for Germany, Polish Congress of the New Right, Swedish Democrats, Independent Greeks, and the Italian Five Star Movement. It is also still possible that members of the Tory led group ECR could defect to the UKIP group. At least one ECR group, the Latvian National Alliance, could defect to the EAF.

EFD and EAF both say they are still confident they will meet the requirements to receive funding.

There are certain countries where “center-right” parties tend to be much further to the right than the average. These include Italy, Hungary, and Croatia, and possibly others.

There are 751 MEPs total.

EU Makeup:

Centrist and Left of Center: 357, 47.5%

S&D (Socialists)

189 Members

ALDE (Centrists, Moderates, Center-Left)

65 Members

G-EFA (Left-wing, center-left combined with center-left to center-right regionalism/secessionist parties)

52 Members

GUE/NGL (Hard-core Marxist, Communist, Far-Left)

51 Members

Right of Center: 377, 50.2%

EPP (Center-Right, Neo-Con, Christian Democrats, Some parties more conservative than others)

220 Members, 29.3%

ECR (Tory led “soft-Euroskeptic,” some parties much more conservative than Tories)

47 Members

EFD (Conservative, Anti-Immigration Euroskeptic group led by UKIP, Membership expected to grow)

34 Members

EAF (Right-wing Euroskeptic group led by Le Pen and Wilders, Membership expected to grow)

38 Members

New Right-wing parties that are still unaffiliated (These are expected to affiliated with either EFD or EAF)

At least 14 Members

Wildcard (Italian 5 Star, Billed as an anti-corruption centrist party, attracted much of the Italian right-wing vote, negotiating with EFD)

17 Members

Unaffiliated Militant Far-Right (Three parties that will probably remain unaffiliated because of “bad boy” image)

7 Members

Other New Unaffiliated Parties with one person each (Ranging from Center-left to Center-right)

17 Members 2.2%

A historical milestone has been reached by Jobbik on the European elections held on May 25. The right-radical party got the second place by gaining 14,8 percent of the votes and can send three members to the European Parliament.

“I have an important announcement to make. As of today the second strongest party of Hungary is called Jobbik” the president of the party, Gabor Vona told at the election’s night, gaining huge applause from the public. Vona thanked the activity of the supporters of the party during the campaign, reminding his audience what a shameful attack Jobbik had to face from the side of governing Fidesz. It is known that the governing party even used the state intelligence services for its political purposes in the campaign against Jobbik, when it instigated a smear-campaign against Jobbik MEP Béla Kovács.

Jobbik has made significant and continuous progress at every election so for, yet, the main goal, defeating the Socialist Party (MSZP) and attaining the second position could not be reached. Now it has been achieved, Vona said. The good result has proven as well, that Jobbik cannot be broken, it is a “stable party that is hard as concrete” added the president of the party.  Now, Jobbik is ready to be the challenger of the governing Fidesz on the next elections.

However, Jobbik still has to work a lot to overtake Fidesz. The governing party, despite the fact that it had lost approximately 1 million voters still gained 51 percent at the EP elections, that were characterized by an extremely low turnout of 27 percent. At the same time, the Socialist Party reached only 10 percent, and after having lost its position as the second party it is now threatened by the secessionist left-wing group of the ex-PM Ferenc Gyurcsany.

The low turnout at the EP election was a clear message from the Hungarian people, showing that they disapprove of the current direction of the European Union, Gabor Vona announced. “We want a Europe but not this kind of union” he stressed. The president of the party told that Jobbik had remained the only force that stood on the side of the Hungarian people.

In his speech Gabor Vona congratulated the three newly elected MEPs of Jobbik, Krisztina Morvai, Zoltan Balczo and Bela Kovacs and reminded his audience that the winners of the future are usually the second-placed of the past. In the spirit of this he insisted on working hard to reach electoral victory in 2018.

Nonwhite colonizer-controlled neighborhoods in many parts of Britain have already collapsed into typical Third World electoral fraud and administrative chaos, reports following last week’s elections in that country have revealed.

According to reports from around the country, British police are investigating more than fifty cases of voter fraud while in one local authority in London, which is run almost completely by nonwhites, Tower Hamlets, the administrative chaos caused a five day delay in getting results out for all of the city.

The electoral fraud so rampant in parts of the Third World which actually hold elections—such as India and Pakistan—has long been apparent in previous elections in Britain, but this is the first time that election results have actually been delayed due to Third World administrative chaos.

Warned ahead of time, police were deployed at more than 100 polling stations in the areas with the largest number of nonwhites in areas previously identified by the UK’s Electoral Commission as being “high risk” for vote-rigging.

More than half of the reported incidents of electoral fraud took place in the nonwhite colonizer dominated towns of West Yorkshire. There, in a rash of incidents prevalent amongst the Pakistani and Indian communities, thousands of “ghost” voters, false statements and multiple votes have taken place, mostly in favor of Labour Party supported candidates.

The other incidents have been reported in cities where nonwhite colonizers also have a large presence—Manchester, Bradford, London, and Birmingham.

According to a report in the far left Guardian newspaper, the “inquiries have emerged after the Guardian contacted police forces covering 16 areas that the elections watchdog has identified as being vulnerable to electoral fraud, particularly around the use of postal votes.

“As well as Birmingham and Bradford, they include Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Calderdale, Coventry, Derby, Hyndburn, Kirklees, Oldham, Pendle, Peterborough, Slough, Tower Hamlets, Walsall, and Woking.”

The paper added that West Yorkshire police, whose officers serve Bradford where former councillors have been imprisoned for electoral fraud, said they had received 21 allegations of electoral irregularities.

There are another 14 investigations across Greater London. Two prospective councillors in the Tower Hamlets and Enfield local authorities were arrested for making false declarations on election papers.

Even Peter Golds, a Jewish homosexual who is one of the few Conservative Party councilors in Tower Hamlets, has called the voting carry-on in Tower Hamlets “Third World.”

Writing in his column in a local newspaper, Gold said that “Sadly the count showed much of what is worst about the divided politics of this borough. Well before the 2am declaration of the mayoral election, the counting centre was besieged by a threatening crowd of Tower Hamlets First supporters.

“A member of Labour’s shadow cabinet, who had been attending the count, was told that he should not leave as the police could not guarantee his safety. He did leave shortly after.

“Another small group, including women, who were by this time exhausted, required a police escort to their car and still later our local MP and one of the mayoral candidates had to leave by the rear of the building.

“Behaviour that would be shocking in the third world, should not be permitted in the world’s greatest and most multi-cultural city.”

Earlier, Golds claimed that the counting procedure was an “omnishambles.”

He wrote: “We were asked to attend the Mile End Leisure centre at 2pm, Sunday for the council counts with the European count commencing at 4pm. We were let in at 3pm and then the chaos started.

“There were arguments, threats, and chaos at the counting tables. Tower Hamlets First supporters were challenging vote after vote, forcing supporters of other candidates away from the tables.

“Former Cllr Mohammed Shahid Ali (defeated Mile End) was bawling in Bangla down a mobile phone at a counting table. He was asked by a (female) officer to stop and he shouted that she (emphasise she) had no right to tell him to stop doing anything and that she (emphasise she) should go away. I drew this to the attention of the returning officer and Shahid Ali then needed to be restrained from attacking me.

“Despite everything we had been told, the count was a shocker. There was a 21% discrepancy in the votes in Island Gardens between the first two counts.”

The Electoral Commission has now said it will look into “issues” surrounding the poll after complaints of voter intimidation and large discrepancies in recounts.

A spokesman said: “Clearly there have been issues at the Tower Hamlets count and we need to make sure we understand what happened, and the reasons for it, before reaching any conclusions.

“As part of our review we will be talking to the Returning Officer and Regional Returning Officer. We will be looking closely at what happened during the count, as well as the planning that took place beforehand.

“Once we have concluded the review we will publish its findings in our report on the elections.”

The antics of UAF supporting yobs at the European Election count in Manchester where BNP leader Nick Griffin attended was truly appalling and disgusting.

But as Nigel Farage the reserve Tory party leader found out, some of these Communists are quite unpalatable people indeed.

These are the people who protest and call us fascist and Nazi – far from the truth of course and just a slur.

Yet they themselves act like totalitarian yobs trying to deny the freedom of speech by those who oppose their Communist and revolutionary Marxists ideology.

Their behaviour on the night was nothing more than an act of anti-democratic bullying.

Party leader Nick Griffin had to duck placards hurled at him and dodge attackers who broke through police barriers, with officer’s rugby tackling some of them, before he was taken into the safety of the town hall.

Prior to that abuse his car was surrounded by the foul mouth yobs until the police moved them away.

What these yobs might have done to him had they actually got to him is dreadful to think about.

But that is the face of the UAF; their Communist and Marxist allies and supported as signatories to the organisation David Cameron and Red useless Ed Miliband.

Yet true to fashion, Nick Griffin who is a decent man and a true patriot of these British Isles responded by saying that his reception at the town hall was “fairly typical”.

He also stated that he would use part of his MEP’s golden goodbye to fund food banks for “our people”.

We ask the far left UAF, what ex MEP of the far-left that you support would do such a gesture?

Whatever the result on the night, the fact remains that Nick Griffin stands head and shoulders above many others, his exiting as an MEP on July 1^st will allow him to concentrate full-time on the party and its growth.

Something he was allowed to do prior to the 2009 European Elections and look what happened then.

He is the far-left`s worse nightmare when it comes to someone with the ability who now has the time to strengthen the party as he does.

Expect the BNP to yet again grow in numbers, already there has been a surge in new members and now the party is preparing to build a strong body of Parish Councillors, Community Councillors in Scotland and upwards.

Not having Nick Griffin tied up in Brussels will only strengthen the party’s membership growth and organisation – and we will regain elected officials across the UK by that effort.

Be of good cheer, we have reason to be.

Nigel Farage today announced UKIP would go after Ed Miliband in his Doncaster seat as part of a campaign to win a ‘good number’ of MPs in 2015.

The UKIP leader told critics who think his party has peaked with last night’s victory in the European elections ‘you ain’t seen nothing yet’, as he announced plans to launch new party policy in the Labour leader’s backyard.

With 11 regions declared, UKIP has won more than 27 per cent of the vote, electing 24 MEPs, leaving Labour and the Tories to battle it out for second for the first time in 100 years.

In a speech to a victory rally in central London, Mr Farage said the party would now focus on trying to win next week’s Newark by-election before attempting to secure enough MPs in Westminster to hold the balance of power in a hung parliament.

With only Northern Ireland left to declare, UKIP has 24 MEPs, up 11 since 2009, including its first MEP in Scotland.

Labour has 20 seats  and the Tories 19 seats in Brussels, with Labour narrowly ahead on vote share – 25.4 per cent to 23.93 per cent.

Support for Ukip has surged by more than 12 per cent, outstripping a more modest boost in votes for Labour, while the Lib Dems faced near-wipeout, slipping into fifth place behind the Greens.

Mr Farage said he was ‘proud’ of the campaign which has seen him humiliate the Westminster parties, pushing Labour and the Tories into second and third.

Speaking at an event in London today, he said: ‘If you think you’ve seen the high watermark of Ukip, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Our small party isn’t so small anymore.’

He announced that he would launch the new UKIP manifesto in Doncaster, where Mr Miliband is a local MP, in a direct challenge to Labour’s cost of living campaign.

In his speech, Mr Farage said: ‘We have got to get policy right… I do feel that the manifesto as it was in 2010, 486 pages of it, was perhaps not the right way to approach politics.

‘We have already been doing substantial work on the NHS, on defence, on education, on public spending and other areas, and we will unveil our outline manifesto for the next general election, and we will do it in a town called Doncaster.

‘It is a town in which Ed Miliband is the MP, it’s a town in which yesterday we topped the polls, and we will have an honest conversation with the British public about the cost-of-living crisis and about how we can make life better and more affordable for ordinary families in this country. Policy will happen in Doncaster in September.’

Mr Farage said he was ‘over the moon’ and predicted that Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg could be forced to quit after losing 11 of his 12 MEPs, despite pitching the Lib Dems as a the ‘party of in’.

On a dramatic political night:

• The Lib Dems clung on to just one MEP – in the South East – as it faced wipeout elsewhere
• Labour only narrowly beat the Tories after failing to make progress in key areas where they must win at the general election
• The BNP lost its place in Brussels, as leader Nick Griffin conceded defeat
• David Cameron rejected local electoral deals with Ukip at next year’s general election, as he dismissed Mr Farage’s image as a ‘normal bloke down the pub’
• Mr Farage hailed the first election triumph for a minor party in more than 100 years
• Across Europe, far-right and Eurosceptic parties swept to victory in many countries

With all the main parties left reeling about how to tackle the rise of UKIP, Mr Blair said action had to be taken to show how Mr Farage offers no solutions to the problems of modern Britain.

Speaking on Swedish television, Mr Blair said: ‘Of course we should be worried when a party like UKIP comes first in the European election, it would be foolish not to be. But on the other hand we also have to stand for what is correct and right for the future of Britain in the 21st century.

Read More