If you live in the United States, and you have consumed half an hour of news since 2016, you’ve probably gotten used to the sound of these things.

These “dog whistles.”

It’s like getting 20% of the red pill, cut down with 80% corn starch or whatever.

You know what I’m talking about – just a little bit of “we made civilization, these people didn’t, we have the neanderthal blood (pre-iceage master race, huge craniums, built pyramids, lost to great flood, plausible story) and these people don’t” but watered down with funny memes or whatever to make it not overly shocking to your latent normie conditioning.

Almonds: activated.

It’s enough to get you out of bed and out to a voting booth. In the great scheme of things, it’s not a bad place to be. If you’re not in the USA, Italy, Russia, Austro-Hungary, Poland or Greece, you get nothing.

mfw i didn’t vote in midterms and got nothing

but a little bit of Truth just leaves you wanting more. Once you’ve ravenously consumed all the watered down stuff, you are left knowing, deep down inside, that there’s something… stronger, just waiting for you to go get it.

But, you can’t get it…

Until you can get it.

RaiNews: (Italian)

“Salvini makes his policies not only at the expense of Spain, but of all of Europe, with his politics of isolation which undermine the European idea.” according to the Foreign Minister of Spain, Borrell, in an interview about the migrant question which he gave to an online German newspaper.

Oh, burn.

Salvini just got served by this oily-faced faggot.

Josep Borrell, the spic version of confirmed faggot Lindsey Graham

What’s he gotta do now, huh?

The reply was not delayed. “We do not respond to insults from governments and ministers that favor an out-of-control immigration,” affirmed Salvini. “We care about the security, culture and identity of the European people.”

And, just like that, zero [0] fucks were given.

He has literally not even one single fuck to give about mewling shekel-whore race traitors who want to convince you that “man, caring about things is so uncool, just relax and embrace your own genocide, man.”

No, Salvini will not relax.

Real men care about themselves. By extension, they care about their blood, their children, and their people.

What they don’t care about are estrogen-skinned race traitor queers.

So here’s your redpill, at 80%:

Men care about the future, because the future is coming.

Rome will rise again.

Here’s the redpill at 100%:

God wills it.

All day the BBC has been triumphantly shouting about a new report that shows that over the last 17 years, European immigrants have paid £4 billion in taxes.

What they forget is that if tax is around 25 percent, then that is £12 billion that the British people were prevented from earning for themselves.

But besides that, the more important news that they were hiding from the report is that non-White immigrants in the same time period have cost the British taxpayer £120 billion.

That is the equivalent of 40 years worth of the entire gross domestic product that one of their own countries like Sierra Leone could produce.

The BBC has been trying to spin this report into making the government seem harsh on immigration by still wanting to cut back on EU migrants, yet nothing at all has been said about the incredible financial burden of hosting all those useless non-Whites.

At least the Telegraph actually publicised what the rest of the report said:

Telegraph:

Immigrants who came to live in Britain from outside Europe cost the public purse nearly £120 billion over 17 years, a new report has shown.

…The report analysed figures from 1995 to 2011, during most of which the Labour government was pursuing vigorously pro-immigration policies.

It found that migrants from outside the European Economic Area (EEA) made a negative contribution to the public purse of £117.9 billion because they consumed more in public expenditure – including NHS costs, welfare hand-outs and education – than they contributed in taxes.

The report, to be published in the Economic Journal, said the non-EEA group – largely made up of immigration from countries such as India, Pakistan and African Commonwealth countries – contributed less because families tended to have more children and lower employment rates.

“Immigrants from non-EEA countries … contribute less than they receive,” the 50-page study concluded.

…

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationWatch, said the report confirmed the huge cost of immigration.

“As for recent European migrants, even on the authors’ own figures – which we dispute – their contribution to the Exchequer amounts to less than £1 a week per head of population,” he said.

…

Between 1995 and 2011 the foreign-born population in the UK doubled from 3.5 million to about 7 million.

The non-EEA population grew from 2.8 million to 4.6 million during the period. Of those, in 2011, just over two million were not working, either because they were unemployed or for other reasons such as retirement or childcare.

At the same time the number of European immigrants in this country grew at a far higher rate, tripling from 723,000 to 2.3 million.

That huge surge was mainly due to the previous Labour government’s decision not to impose controls on the eight eastern Europeans, including Poland, which joined the EU in 2004.

…

Meanwhile a separate study published by the Office for National Statistics exposed the full extent of language ghettoes in this country.

New analysis of the 2011 Census showed that around 90 per cent of elderly Bangladeshi-born women living in the UK cannot speak English.

And almost four in 10 Chinese-born migrants who settled in the UK more than 30 years ago had no English.

One of the biggest problems with stupid goyim is that they believe cultural enrichment from third world nations should be free, when in fact it is exorbitantly expense.  But worth every penny.

Thanks to the rise of Nationalism in Europe and the large Pro-White media presence on the internet, the mainstream media is finally being forced to address the issue of Non-White immigration.

You’re right media – it’s a bloody mess.

This is what we’ve been saying.

Express:

Of all the horror policies of the Blair-Brown government, their open-door immigration ­approach ranks at the top of the list. Moving from a steady average of about 300,000 a year, immigration quickly escalated to almost double that figure under Labour.

This meant that there was approximately one new immigrant arriving in Britain for every minute of the Labour government. Where did they come from?

Between 2005 and 2010, the UK gained 525,000 immigrants from the European Union – 304,000 from the Eastern Euro­pean member states.

Contrast this with the 1.2 million mig­rants from outside the EU who remain in Britain from the same period and you will see that EU immigration actually makes up less than a third of Britain’s total ­immigration figure.

Despite the media attention, Eastern Europeans make up barely 18 per cent of the total figure.

So, we have two tasks. To renegotiate a new relationship with the EU that allows us to control European migration, and to control the much larger non-EU figure, something already within our power.

Do we need any immigration at all?

In my book Rising Tides I set out the picture for such heavily indebted countries as Britain and Japan. What is known as the age dependency ratio (the number of pensioners per 1,000 people of working age) will increase from 300 (which has been a stable average since the 1970s) to almost 500 in 2051.

Currently, for every three workers contributing to National Insurance, there is one person receiving a pension. In the next 40 years this will change to two workers for every pensioner. It could be worse.

With an age dependency rate of 370, ­Japan is already dealing with this issue. It has used technological improvements to increase the efficiency of workers and the government is trying to mobilise more of its retired and women. Although these measures have no doubt helped, they are not enough on their own. The UN has recommended that Japan either raises its retirement age to 77 or allows an additional 40 million immigrants over the next 40 years; equivalent to a third of the country’s current population and not, therefore, a comfortable choice for politicians.

How do we in Britain get an immigration policy that deals with our ageing ­population’s needs while balancing social and cultural considerations?

The first thing is to control total numbers. High incoming numbers put pressures on schools, health services, housing and jobs. It also makes integration more difficult and runs an increased risk of creating ghettos. Getting control of numbers is not enough though. We also need to properly decide which individuals come here.