People don’t really seem to be aware of it, but George Floyd’s fat, stupid corpse is still hanging over all of society.

Probably, everyone is aware that Disney has turned the Marvel Cinematic Universe full George Floyd. However, people without kids and people with kids who don’t take their kids to the movies anymore because everything is black and gay, probably don’t know that Disney’s line of animated kids movies is full George Floyd.

Seven of the top 10 grossing animated releases ever were from Disney and released in the five years leading up to George Floyd. None of them feature colored people main stars (excluding the Lion King remake, where the blacks voice talking animals in Africa) or homosexual themes, and none have colored people or female directors.

After the Summer of Floyd, when the virus hoax stopped, Disney released double George Floyd films.

Strange World featured Disney’s first homosexual main character, and was decked out with blacks and other coloreds. (I didn’t see it, but watching the trailer just now, it looks like the gay main character has a son and the “second father” is dead, and the film just doesn’t explain that, suggesting the son was produced through surrogacy or was an asshole baby. I’m sure a lot of kids were asking mommy about the mechanics of this.)

Lightyear, which was ostensibly a Toy Story film, was the same thing – homosexuals and all colored people save the main white person. The company did not hire Tim Allen, the comedian who voiced the character since I was a little kid, because he is politically conservative. That was okay in 2019, when Toy Story 4 was released, but not in 2022. Because of George Floyd.

Both of the films failed totally and each lost the company somewhere between $100-$200 million dollars. Part of this was due to China (and several other countries) refusing to screen films with homosexuals (let alone films that are targeted at children, encouraging them to become homosexuals). You can’t really have a modern blockbuster without China. Russia also is not a small market, and they’ve just recently started banning homosexual films.

With Lightyear, the studio had original removed the gay stuff before release so that it could be shown in China, but the temporary CEO (Bob Chopek) announced that because Ron DeSantis said that schools would have to wait until the 4th grade to teach kids anal sex (with men at least), he was putting the gay stuff back in the film as revenge.

This year, Disney released the George Floyd film “Elemental,” which was about race-mixers fighting racism to defend their unnatural relationship. The fact that it portrays race-mixing as “fire having sex with water” is probably notable, though the filmmakers announced that the purpose of the film was to promote interracial sex to children.

It’s unclear if Elemental actually lost money, or just barely broke even, but it sold fewer tickets than any Pixar film ever, excluding the previously mentioned Lightyear.

Later this month, Disney is releasing a fourth George Floyd animated film.

Wish is a totally black thing that is probably all gays, excluding the evil white male villain who is trying to exploit the black bitch.

It’s really incredible to do this four times in a row.

It is Because of George Floyd

It’s not actually because of George Floyd. George Floyd was a moment, which was meant to be revolutionary. Obviously, George Floyd was a black thing, not a gay thing. Blacks don’t even appreciate homosexuals. But it was the symbolic revolutionary moment where the Jewish media told everyone: “now everything is going to change forever.”

People accepted this revolution on its face. But then, after a while, when it became obvious that this meant drastic rises in violent crime (and homosexual children), it was like “okay, well, I don’t really like this.”

In 2022, at his State of the Union, Biden said that it was a lie that the left was trying to “defund the police” and actually, he is trying to “fund the police.”

That shows that everyone was sick of this George Floyd stuff, according to internal polling, by March of 2022. It was effectively an announcement of “okay, we’re dialing back this George Floyd stuff with the blacks.”

I’m sure that had already begun production of Elemental and Wish after Floydism had been rolled back, but we can see with the Marvel films that there is no end in sight to the blackness, feminism, or gay shit. The only apparently “normal” film Disney is releasing at all is Deadpool 3, which was already in production when they bought the studio from Fox. No trailer has been released and that will probably be gay, but it has Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman ostensibly as masculine white male leads (I am sure there will be jokes about them being gay together, at least). I liked the first Deadpool. I didn’t watch the second one. I heard it was gay and it had a female mulatto in the ads (though she was kinda hot, tbh).

They are releasing “Marvels” next week, which is a vaginal movie with that ugly bitch with toe fungus and a black and a paki.

There is some precedent for returning to normalcy in entertainment. After the revolutionary period of the 1960s, people started complaining that all the films had serious full-frontal nudity and non-simulated penetration in them, and new rules were set. That’s when the ratings system became relevant and films started getting banned from theatres. It’s also when Clint Eastwood started dominating as a masculine man making fascist films. The initial popularity of Dirty Harry was attributed to people being sick of hippy shit.

I don’t really care very much about movies anymore. I do care, but there are so many old ones I can watch or rewatch. I would prefer movies that were released were good, like The Departed and Gangs of New York. But it’s okay.

However, this stuff is still harming society, even if not very many people are watching it. In the 1970s, people were literally doing counter-revolutionary protests over all of the hippie sex stuff, but there was a legal framework for that. Actually, there still is a legal framework for obscenity in film, and even in a porno culture where everyone grows up surrounded by hardcore porno on the internet, they can’t show early 1970s-tier porno in the theatre.

Complaining to the government about colored people and women definitely wouldn’t be possible, and it probably wouldn’t even be possible to complain to the government about Disney actively trying to turn children homosexual, given the various civil rights decisions that have been made around homosexuality.

Further, this is a sort of barometer showing that even though George Floyd is over in most people’s minds, and even though nearly two years ago, Biden announced it was over, George Floydism continues to dominate the corporate culture. That isn’t totally true, because after the Biden announcement, corporations began firing their “diversity and inclusion officers” that they hired during the George Floyd uprising. There was a big article that the Wall Street Journal released un-paywalled about this back in July.

Corporations also didn’t appoint a bunch of black CEOs, as they’d vaguely implied they were going to do (if I recall correctly, it wasn’t ever stated directly, but there was a lot of “it’s time for white men to step aside” and so on).

Still, all of the entertainment companies are still willing to lose money. Look at the video games. Diablo 4 was released in June, and you open the game and you have a choice of five black characters. Granted, I’m sure the development was primarily during the Floydist era, but they could have changed stuff around before release. This is a game where probably less than 1% of the player-base is black, and the blacks who do play it recognize it as a “white peepo game” and would not be demanding representation (plus, they can always create a black character – that’s been the case forever and even I don’t care about that). This is a game set in medieval Russia, where having half or more of the population black simply doesn’t make any sense.

There have been analyses showing that if you put a black character on the front of a video game (or in the main ad online), the sales drop massively, and companies keep doing it. (Note: That sentence might imply there was some big study done, so I want to clarify: I don’t think there has been an actual study showing this, because no one would do that study unless they were using it to prove gamers are racist, but I’ve seen big things on 4chan comparing sales of similar games with and without black people on the cover, and it’s clearly the case that sales drop. No one doesn’t know this, and it’s simply impossible that studios haven’t noted internally that when they are marketing a game primarily to whites, with a minority Asian player-base, blacks on the cover kill sales.)

What’s more: consumers are clearly more sensitive towards blacks dominating entertainment media which is clearly primarily intended for a white audience post-Floyd. Battlefield 1, released in 2016, is the first game I remember featuring a black on the cover, and though people on 4chan were complaining, this doesn’t seem to have affected sales. However, in the post-Floyd age, people understand that replacing white characters with blacks is actually a personal attack on them, and many are unwilling to spend money to be attacked.

It’s scary when corporations are willing to lose money in order to force an agenda on you. It shows that something has gone out of control. It’s not normal. Corporations should want money. That is the basis of our system: companies are supposed to be driven by profit, and the government is supposed to make rules so that that profit motive cannot be socially destructive. Business and government should in some sense be in opposition, because they should counterbalance each other. Not that there can’t be public-private stuff, not like they’re at war with each other, but there should be opposition.

If the system has changed, and now both public and private actors are working in concert to destroy the white race, put women in charge of everything, and make everyone gay, then what exactly is driving this? You can just say “the Jews,” and I’m quite sure that is the correct answer, but what exactly is the mechanism? Jews love money, and I don’t think they actually care about black people, so if a Jew owns a game company, and knows that he will lose 30-50% on sales if he puts a black woman on the cover, why does he do it?

You can say “well, Jews care more about destroying society than they care about making money,” and maybe that is true in some broad sense, but I don’t think it is true for individual Jews, in most cases. Particularly in the cases where the Jews are successful monied Jews, I do not believe it is the case.

I doubt it is the case for Bobby Kotick (Activison-Blizzard).

Or for Robert Altman (Zenimax/Bethesda).

I think those are two individual Jews who would prefer the cash. They’ll sneak some race, vagina, or gay shit in if it doesn’t cost them money, but when you’re talking about “massive sales loss,” I just don’t believe they would do that, all things being equal. However, for some reason they are doing it.

I will further say that Disney’s Bob Iger would pick money over causing social harm, if he had to choose. He’s publicly walked back some of the “woke” stuff, due to losses. He said this in a blunt way in September, and he implied it before that.

This clearly demonstrates that he does care about money. If it was only about forcing the agenda, he would just attack audiences for not watching race/vagina/anal propaganda, as many have already done.

Still, the company just keeps pumping out this “Never Forget George Floyd” tripe that no one wants (or very few people want – I do not think black people care that Disney is releasing a bunch of black-centric cartoons, though probably Jews and unmarried white women appreciate it).

So, what mechanism is enforcing this George Floydism on the corporate world?

I don’t know the answer to that.

Up Next for Disney Animation: Light-Skinned Quadroon

For the record, there is at least one datapoint that indicates Disney will dial back the social agenda.

The first trailer for the next Disney-Pixar film, scheduled for 2025, has been released. (Released rather early, I might add – they must have wanted the trailer out early for some reason, and produced it way before finishing the film. Generally, production is finished about a year before release.)

Elio’s teaser starts out with what looks like a mulatto female computer genius. It shows a photo, showing that she is married to a white guy, so her son, the titular Elio, is a light-skinned quadroon. It’s highlighted that her husband is white, and therefore the quadroon has light-skin.

From the trailer, I don’t see anything gay, or any themes around race-mixing. It honestly just looks like a fun kids’ film, like Disney films when I was a kid, with the classic premise of a normal kid from earth getting caught at the center of big space drama.

If you were looking at this from the outside, you might think that scaling down the main character’s blackness to 25% is symbolic of the George Floyd agenda going out of style.

I doubt that is actually happening, but replacing black-dominated films with a light-skinned quadroon is too weird to not note, as it really seems like a purposeful signal that someone – Iger, specifically – is trying to dial this back due to losses.

Frankly, I am almost certain that this was originally slated to have a dark-skinned kid as the star (the voice actor appears Indian or something), and Bob Iger went in and said “nope, we can’t do this again – it’s costing too much money,” that some people on the team said “yeah, but what about George Floyd? We’re never supposed to forget him,” and then the idea of a light-skinned quadroon was pitched and accepted.

Michael Jackson Facts:

MJ was a child singer. His father was a total scumbag, who very much liked the money he was making off his kids.

When MJ reached the age of puberty, his father gave him hormones to stop puberty so his voice wouldn’t change. pic.twitter.com/bTZ8LDuHiN

— Andrew Anglin (@WorldWarWang) January 23, 2023

This article was originally published on Twitter.com. Andrew Anglin is the only person writing thousand-word essays on Twitter.com.

MJ was a child singer. His father was a total scumbag, who very much liked the money he was making off his kids.

When MJ reached the age of puberty, his father gave him hormones to stop puberty so his voice wouldn’t change.

These drugs destroyed his sexuality. It was a chemical castration, even more primitive than what wokies are doing to kids now.

He was completely incapable of getting an erection throughout his life. He was definitively asexual – a eunuch.

Physical abuse is obviously more prevalent in the African-American community, but the beatings of Jackson patriarch Joe have been reported by several of the Jackson kids and those close to the family as beyond the pale.

In the rare interviews he gave, Michael described his life of one of shame and misery, and always pointed back to his childhood as the source of this pain.

In a 1993 interview with Oprah, MJ talked about Joe beating him and calling him ugly, and how this shaped him as an adult. pic.twitter.com/hD9SKy8ccS

— Andrew Anglin (@WorldWarWang) January 23, 2023

Further, it is worth mentioning that MJ’s sister, La Toya, publicly accused Joe of raping her from the time she was 11.

Women do lie about this, so take it with a grain of salt, but Joe was clearly a man without any kind of morals beyond “get dat money.”

Obviously, MJ was a weird guy. No one is going to deny that and he wouldn’t have denied it himself.

There was a whole public history of incredibly weird behavior before he was ever accused of molesting boys. The plastic surgery alone is the mark of someone with serious problems.

In 2002, he hung his alleged child out of a window in Berlin.

This child he named “Blanket” and covered his face in public.

We know that none of these kids were Michael’s.

Changing your skin color with plastic surgery does not change your genetics, and it is absurd to suggest that Paris Jackson is half black.

MJ was smart and talented, but what was done to him as a child wrecked his psyche.

It was easy to believe that something weird was going on with him.

Due to the abuse he suffered as a kid, he never developed into adulthood.

He enjoyed the company of children, because he was in many ways a child in a man’s body.

He built Neverland Ranch, where kids in LA could come play in a small theme park in his yard.

“Neverland” is a reference to Peter Pan, the boy who never grew up.

Michael did hang out with kids. That’s true. He hung out with kids and acted like a kid with them.

Home Alone actor Macaulay Culkin spent a lot of time with him.

Culkin testified at MJ’s 2005 trial. He’s continued to defend him, most recently in 2020 after random individuals produced yet another documentary defaming MJ.

If anyone knew, it would be him, and he has zero reason to lie – especially given he could make money lying.

In 1995, he sang lyrics that disparaged secular humanists. In 2003, he entered a legal battle with a powerful secular humanist over a crooked secular humanist contract, and made comments about random individuals on a tape.

Later that year, the Santa Barbara district attorney opened up a case against him over allegations of molesting a 13-year-old boy at Neverland.

He was charged, raided and arrested in a humiliating spectacle.

Michael vowed to fight the case hard and clear his name and he did. In the end, he was acquitted of all charges.

The case was an absolute farce and a blood libel.

There was never any evidence that Michael had done anything, it was all just allegations from the parents.

Mere months after the trial ended, the mother, who was the source of the allegations, was convicted of welfare fraud.

But the case succeeded in its real goal – the goal of the lawyers and money men behind it – which was to smear Michael Jackson’s name.

To this day, I hear people saying he was a molester, and it just makes me sick that they can do this to a person.

Michael loved the public. He cared much too much about what they thought.

So in 2009, four years and 12 days after having been cleared of all charges, Michael died of a drug overdose.

There is nothing more evil you can do to a man than purposefully try to damage his name.

It’s damage that lasts after your death. It’s a kind of taint on your soul.

I personally understand what it is like to be lied about like this. In 2017, knowing I do not have the ability to sue them, Atlantic Magazine published a cover story about me claiming I am a sadomasochist, a homosexual, and a (heterosexual) child abuser, among other things.

I did no interviews for that article. The article did not have any sources. It was written by a blogger who was obsessed with me, who I believe later died.

I joke about it, and I don’t think anyone takes it seriously. It was too over the top – “he is every bad thing!”

However, given my own experience with the media, I can tell you this: they can simply create entire narratives out of nothing at all.

You know it’s not true because it’s your life, but they can say it and there is nothing you can do.

Michael Jackson was a very troubled man. He had a lot of problems and did a lot of weird things.

However, he was a good person. He did his best with the hand he was dealt, and all of the people who really knew him testified to his kindness and generosity.

I hope that when people see these lies being spread about Michael, they speak up and explain that there was never any evidence for any of it.

The evidence is: he crossed random individuals who will cooperate together to destroy anyone who goes against them and he paid the price.

Candace Owens, also known as Der Schwarze Fuhrer, is here to explain the whole thing

You might not remember this, but Kim Kardashian is famous because she released a home made porno with some black guy.

It’s very retro to have this coming out 20 years after the fact.

Breitbart:

Singer Ray J, who once appeared in a sex tape with Kim Kardashian, slammed her mother Kris Jenner in an Instagram video on Saturday, claiming that Jenner reviewed multiple videos featuring her daughter and him having sexual intercourse, and chose which one to release to the public.

“Kris, you know what you did. I’m about to show people what you did,” Ray J said in a 44-minute Instagram video. “Me and Kim, we signed a contract the same exact day for the same amount of money, $400,000.”

“You wanna see the sex tape contract?” Ray J said elsewhere in the lengthy video, before showing a purported image of paperwork revealing they were both paid $400,000.

Ray J on one pic.twitter.com/BiQvpJ3UJi

— koop velaryon (@koopa_kinte) September 11, 2022

“So here’s what happened. Kim’s rushing me, her mom’s rushing me, like, ‘Get this shit done, get it signed.’ Kim’s with me while I’m signing my contract. She’s like, ‘Hurry up, babe,’” Ray J continued of the sex tape contract, which he said gave the company Vivid the right to sell the video.

The singer added that he was told, “We like the tape, but we need you to go do it one more time in Santa Barbara — even though you’re not together — for safety.”

Ray J also displayed a page from the purported contract, which listed three separate sex tapes.

After going through the videos one last time, they chose the older one, because “it showed Kim in a better light,” he said.

“The other one was just too raunchy. Okay, I know. I did it. We were like kids, we were like, ‘Where the money at? I’m ready to go buy this fucking car’ — and then fast-forward to now, my daughter and son are, like,” Ray J said before pausing, appearing to become emotional.

‘That shit is fucked up,” he finally said. “I only got emotional for my kids. I love my kids. This ain’t over with.”

Ray J also noted Jenner’s recent appearance on the Late Late Show with James Corden, where she answered questions from James Corden while hooked up to an apparent polygraph machine.

In one question, Corden asked, “Did you help Kim release her sex tape?” to which Jenner replied, “No.” The lie detector examiner, John Grogan, then said that Jenner was telling the truth.

“The lie detector dude you had was a fraud,” Ray J said in his video. “There has to be some kind of industry crime for that.”

In his Instagram video, Ray J also mentioned a recent episode of The Kardashians, in which Kim Kardashian’s ex-husband rapper Kanye West allegedly recovers a computer, which was said to contain more footage of him and Kim.

The singer appeared to react to that by pulling out a phone and displaying a purported Instagram direct messages (DM) that he sent to Kim Kardashian in April, which read as follows:

Why are you playing games Kim – I’ve been nothing but a team player – we all had an agreement – now you are trying to drag my name for your new show and that ain’t cool! It fucks up my business and relationships – when we sat down with [Vivid CEO] Steve Hirsch and your mom and we planned all of this together now you really are taking this lie to the next level making me look crazy – I don’t wanna expose the real shit that we did but you are leaving me no choice!

Kanye said you wanted the footage and I gave him all of the videos and pics and texts from me and you [because] I was trying to make things OK and make you feel better – now I realize this is another promo stunt for you – unless you reach out to me soon I’m gonna take it to the next level where it shows all of what we did – all of the meetings and [conversations] about the plan – date and times for our meetings and the whole lie you and Kris planned since the beginning – this is not a threat – you’ve taken this too far.

You know what we did! Your mom controlled this whole sex tape deal with Joe Francis and Steve Hirsch – it was her idea to put out the tape with Vivid – all I did was agree – now you wanna make it seem like I’m doing it again without your control – all those fake tears – your fans trusting you to be honest and sincere but it’s all fake for the cameras – I was playing my part until you started doing all of this! Why are you trying to ruin me when you know I was just a player in this! You have to stop believing your own lies!

“Everybody wins but me,” Ray J told Kim Kardashian elsewhere in his messages. “I’m the bad guy every time. I’m tired of being the villain. I did this for us in the beginning but now without your support it fucks me over bad.”

I don’t think he’s faking the paperwork.

How does a show this fake manage to be this boring?

I can’t imagine being a celebrity and then accusing rando peasants of abuse.

The Guardian:

Steve Toussaint has revealed he received racist abuse online after he was cast as Corlys Velaryon in the upcoming Game Of Thrones prequel House of the Dragon.

The 57-year-old British actor has previously starred in Doctor Who, Line of Duty and Death in Paradise.

Speaking to the Radio Times about his lead role in the highly anticipated HBO series, Toussaint said: “When they announced [my casting], one of the first things I saw on social media was a drawing of the character [from the books] next to a picture of me.

“And then there was the racist abuse that came with that.”

In the books by George RR Martin on which the series is based, the Velaryons are described as having white skin, ghostly pale hair and purple eyes. However, in the new series the clan are reimagined as black nobles with long silver dreadlocks.

Reflecting on the backlash from fans of the series of books, Toussaint continued: “I kind of thought: ‘Oh, I get it’. When we were criminals and pirates and slaves in the other show, you were OK with that.

“But as this guy is the richest [character] in the show and he’s a nobleman, now you have a problem with it.

“In House Of The Dragon [our colour] is just a given – I quite like that.”

Despite the risk that acknowledging the backlash could give it greater prominence, Toussaint said he thought it was important to address it.

I don’t even think most of these people complaining about this stuff are even “racists.” They just want their shows to not be so shitty.

The main issue with the casting is the fact that the characters race actually plays a part lmao, House Velaryon is a Valyrian House, Purple Eyes and Pale White Skin is their characteristic. It makes no sense for a Valyrian to be black or dark skinned. This is not a racist thing.

— Ahmad (@Zenorastic) August 9, 2022

House Valyrian just changed. This man is black. Anyone who gives a fuck has some serious issues.

— Sanguine (@sanguine61981) August 11, 2022

They hate that it went against the books and what George created because Velaryons were pail white. Yet George probably gave his approval to retcon this. Either way diversity and inclusion are very important in this franchise. They should reflect the audiences who pay to see them

— chaotic (@1egaltk) August 9, 2022

I’m a well known apologist for Billie Eilish, even her newer over-produced garbage (to be clear, I can’t really defend the last offering, frankly – that is really just inedible garbage – the James Bond song is pretty much where I drew the line).

Billie is entering “Childish Gambino” levels of disappointing sellout garbage. (At least Glover gave us “This is America” before he lost the plot and joined Disney.)

But there is another.

In terms of self-made Soundcloud skank musicians, LIA LIA is better. Possibly way better (we don’t know yet).

And she’s not even a fat slob shilling for Democrats.

I mean, she’ll obviously get fatter and start shilling if someone asks her to shill. Women are stupid whores.

But I love this shit.

I don’t understand why this isn’t getting more attention.

None of her videos even have 100,000 views.

This video is from 2017, so it’s not like she just popped up and hasn’t hit it yet.

That song is at least as good as anything Billie is putting out now, if not quite up to par with her original soundcloud stuff.

It just shows really that the people who are pop stars are just picked basically at random, and often for how shitty they are.

I do think that Billie actually overcame that, because her music is actually good, and she was able to rally organic support on Soundcloud and money for high-production value videos.

But LIA LIA is better, probably.

At the very least, she’s a lot more fun.

She has less than two thousand subs on her YouTube and she’s only put up three videos on it, so maybe this is not a career and something she just does for fun?

Her Soundcloud is not much more active. Though there are two good songs on there that are not on her YouTube page.

Plus an 11 minute stream mix that is beautiful.

If this was the old days when I had a huge readership and reach, I’d make it a goal to make LIA LIA a real pop star.

Unfortunately, I don’t have that power anymore.

I have even less power since the Russians decided to evict me from my domain while cribbing my talking points for their most important speech since the Berlin wall came down.

She’s German, by the way (as opposed to Dutch). In the old days, we could have gotten her arrested for Holocaust denial just by promoting her music. Of course, nothing would happen to her because she’s a young and attractive woman.

But I hope she makes more music.

I’m an official stan.

As far as I can tell, there isn’t an album to download on bandcamp or whatever. It’s just these songs. I would pay for more of these songs.

If she’s reading this (and I’m sure she is because I’m a lot more famous than she is), I’d advise putting out more music, without the videos (necessarily).

The music is really good. Yes, you’re cute. We get that. But not every song has to have a video of you looking cute and acting silly.

Do you really think you and your team couldn’t put out an album better than the original The Avalanches albums? 

Billie Eilish is a fat bitch occupying your throne, babe.

At the very least, you can make a lot of money by being a right-wing favorite. I do still have the ability to distribute these kinds of ideas.

Don’t make Nazi songs, you will go to prison.

But the moth song is fantastic, as it directly mocks the absurdity of modern society. That’s all you have to do.

Don’t let the light fade.

(Yes, I think the Moth song should be played on right-wing live streams.)

I’m a well known apologist for Billie Eilish, even her newer over-produced garbage (to be clear, I can’t really defend the last offering, frankly – that is really just inedible garbage – the James Bond song is pretty much where I drew the line).

Billie is entering “Childish Gambino” levels of disappointing sellout garbage. (At least Glover gave us “This is America” before he lost the plot and joined Disney.)

But there is another.

In terms of self-made SoundCloud skank musicians, LIA LIA is better. Possibly way better (we don’t know yet).

And she’s not even a fat slob shilling for Democrats.

I mean, she’ll obviously get fatter and start shilling if someone asks her to shill. Women are stupid whores.

But I love this shit.

I don’t understand why this isn’t getting more attention.

None of her videos even have 100,000 views.

This video is from 2017, so it’s not like she just popped up and hasn’t hit it yet.

That song is at least as good as anything Billie is putting out now, if not quite up to par with her original SoundCloud stuff.

It just shows really that the people who are pop stars are just picked basically at random, and often for how shitty they are.

I do think that Billie actually overcame that, because her music is actually good, and she was able to rally organic support on SoundCloud and money for high production value videos.

But LIA LIA is better, probably.

At the very least, she’s a lot more fun.

She has less than two thousand subs on her YouTube and she’s only put up three videos on it, so maybe this is not a career and something she just does for fun?

Her SoundCloud is not much more active. Though there are two good songs on there that are not on her YouTube page.

Plus an 11-minute stream mix that is beautiful.

If this was the old days when I had a huge readership and reach, I’d make it a goal to make LIA LIA a real pop star.

Unfortunately, I don’t have that power anymore.

I have even less power since the Russians decided to evict me from my domain while cribbing my talking points for their most important speech since the Berlin wall came down.

She’s German, by the way (as opposed to Dutch). In the old days, we could have gotten her arrested for Holocaust denial just by promoting her music. Of course, nothing would happen to her because she’s a young and attractive woman.

But I hope she makes more music.

I’m an official stan.

As far as I can tell, there isn’t an album to download on Bandcamp or whatever. It’s just these songs. I would pay for more of these songs.

If she’s reading this (and I’m sure she is because I’m a lot more famous than she is), I’d advise putting out more music, without the videos (necessarily).

The music is really good. Yes, you’re cute. We get that. But not every song has to have a video of you looking cute and acting silly.

Do you really think you and your team couldn’t put out an album better than the original The Avalanches albums? 

Billie Eilish is a fat bitch occupying your throne, babe.

At the very least, you can make a lot of money by being a right-wing favorite. I do still have the ability to distribute these kinds of ideas.

Don’t make Nazi songs, you will go to prison.

But the moth song is fantastic, as it directly mocks the absurdity of modern society. That’s all you have to do.

Don’t let the light fade.

(Yes, I think the moth song should be played on right-wing live streams.)

I recently wrote something about how horrible popular culture is, and as is always the case – even all these years later – a reader commented:

You do have the choice to not consume this stuff.

As the regular reader is aware, my position is that you don’t really have that choice.

I gave him a refresher on a conversation we’ve already had, over and over again, and I realized that others have probably forgotten or not heard the explanation as to why it is necessary to engage on some level with popular culture.

I replied:

We’ve had this conversation six million times. It’s already been fully debated and discussed, ad infinitum.

But I’ll reiterate, because you continue to reiterate:

Consuming this media is a universal social norm, and if you don’t consume any of it, you are marked immediately as anti-social by virtually everyone in society.

It used to be this way with sports, and still is in some states and provinces I’m sure, where even if you didn’t watch sports, you had to have some knowledge of it, or you were immediately denoted as anti-social.

This also applies to disliking it (just like Google rewards dislikes almost as much as likes, because it’s engagement).

You can say: “screw Zach Snyder and his reboot of a film he already released, he just made a horrible film and tried to explain away why it was so horrible by saying he didn’t edit it. Now, all the hype for the ‘Snyder Cut’ is going to make people go in thinking it is going to be good, and then walk away with that impression, even though it will still be the same pile of garbage remixed.”

If you say something like that, people see that you are engaged, and mark it down in their brains that you’re normal. They also may agree or disagree.

Again: we’ve already been all the way through this, to Jupiter and back, and it is simply a fact of reality that if you totally abstain from entertainment media, and tell people that, you will be marked as suspicious and not part of the group.

It’s a sad reality, just like “there are black people in America” is a sad reality. But just like with the latter thing, it doesn’t go away because you wished for it to go away, so you have to be strategic in how you deal with it. Going around saying “just stop watching all media” is no different than saying “we’ll just ship the blacks back to Africa.” It is an autistic (or stupid, but usually autistic) denial of objective social realities.

The only answer is “I’m okay with being anti-social, I don’t talk to anyone other than my own family anyway.” This would mean you don’t work with anyone else. If you work with other people, and don’t talk to them about media, or don’t talk to them at all, they will mark you down and start trying to root you out. If you have a farm and only stay on the farm, or if you own a small business and only hire your friends who are high on red pills, then you can abstain from any knowledge of entertainment media. However, if your situation is different than that, and you do interact with other people, then you don’t really have a choice other than to be at least vaguely aware of what is going on in the entertainment world.

I don’t personally watch all that much entertainment media, but I do read about it. If I’m ever in a situation where I need to talk about it, I can give the passable level of input on it.

There is no plausible reason why you would want to appear anti-social to the people around you. So you should always remain tapped in to whatever it is that normal people in your area are into, if you want to have any hope of influencing them and bringing them closer to our side of things.

Before the coronavirus, I would make sure to try and watch every major blockbuster film. There are only about 5 of them a year, so it’s not a huge commitment. That probably matters less because of the coronavirus hoax, which is reshaping our culture. I don’t think I will be able to make it through the 4-hour Snyder Cut, even if Joker does say “we live in a society.” (But I do know that Zach Snyder bizarrely denounced Geeks + Gamers, which is a good thing to say in a conversation to someone who is into this, and as I just said, I did watch the trailer and know that Joker is in it and says “we live in a society.” I could easily have a conversation with a person about the Snyder Cut, despite the fact that I really don’t think I can make it through it.)

I don’t have time to sit around and watch Netflix, but I do make sure to know what the popular shows are. I watch some of the YouTube channels where people hate on all of this stuff. RedLetterMedia for example is actually good entertainment based on reviewing bad entertainment, and it makes it fun to be aware of what is going on in popular culture without actually having to be a part of it.

I assume RLM is going to get banned in the next year or so, because they’re just going to make it against the rules on the internet to say anything negative about any aspect of the establishment, including allegedly entertaining media.

With the coronavirus scheme changing so much, it’s difficult to say what the new popular culture will look like. I think they are going to get rid of the big movies, and focus more on serialized streaming. The thing is, Game of Thrones was supposedly the most expensive TV show ever made, and a season of it was the same cost as a 2 hour film. The cost is in building the sets, hiring the actors and staff, flying them to locations, and so on. To make a 2 hour film, they film hundreds of hours of footage anyway, so lengthening the script doesn’t really make production costs significantly higher.

Films were made for theaters, and I think at this point, it is very clear that theaters are not coming back, at least nowhere near the scale that they were. People apparently showed that they are not willing to pay $30 to rent a movie to watch at home just because it’s new. Disney tried that with Mulan and some other films they’d already made before the lockdown began, and though the numbers were secret, they apparently weren’t good, because they’ve stopped doing that and no one else has tried it.

(The Atlantic wrote a big article about Mulan and Hollywood ending blockbusters, if you want more information on that topic. China obviously isn’t doing the whole “pandemic” hoax, and their theaters are still open, but they are also beginning to make their own films, so I don’t think Hollywood will continue the same form just for China.)

Point being: whatever the new culture is, you should make a point to be familiar with it, so you can talk about it in passing with people around you and not seem like a weirdo.

It’s Your Life, I’m Just Telling You How It Is

As I said in my reply: it is fine to be against the entertainment, you just have to be engaged with it. You can say it all sucks. Probably, you should be able to say “oh but I did like [x entertainment product],” so you just don’t come across as totally negative, but even if you come across as totally negative, that doesn’t necessarily mark you as an outsider, it just marks you as miserable. (But c’mon – The Mandalorian was legitimately a fun time.)

Facts are facts and reality is reality. If you want to live in a fantasy world, where you are going to work with a few people from the internet to build a perfect vision of a utopian society, and you refuse to be polluted with Jewish popular culture, you can do that. It’s your life. But understand that you will never have any impact on society at large, and that what you are doing is no different than a child playing pretend.

Staying Grounded in Society

Beyond just being able to talk to people, the fact of the matter is, you need to maintain some kind of connection to this society. For the sake of your own self, you need to have some understanding of what the people around you think and feel. Disconnecting from that is not going to make your life better, it will just make you alone and alienated.

I have witnessed, over the last 5 years, that right-wingers who have embraced the “disconnect from society” philosophy have ended up forming cults. Most of you who have been involved in this scene immediately know what I’m talking about. That is not good. It does you no good to be in a cult, and that is the end result of engaging in fantasies.

These people end up hating normal people, and then the obvious question becomes: then why do you want to save white people, if you actually hate them? That is at the core of what we’ve seen with the remnants of the Alt-Right becoming increasingly bizarre and confused (aside from fed influence, of course – but the two go hand in hand).

We do live in a society. No matter how broken it is, we are a part of it. We can’t make that reality go away, no matter how many conversations we have on the internet about how we are true National Socialists, how we don’t ever watch any Jew media, and how when we take power, we’re going to ship all the black people back to Africa.

In the end, you wake up every morning in a society with other people. You can join a cult, you can go live in the woods alone and eat small birds, or you can deal with the reality you were born into.

Your life is miserable. Everything is falling apart. Your family has been destroyed, you have no power, you’re probably fat, women rule over you.

But if you lived in the Game of Thrones universe, your life would be awesome.

Study Finds:

Are you a Stark or a Lannister? Who was your pick to sit on the Iron Throne? Hit shows like “Game of Thrones” allow viewers to lose themselves in another world and even form attachments to the fictional characters who live there. A new study finds people who immerse themselves in their favorite shows can actually start to “become” a fictional character. Researchers from The Ohio State University say a person’s brain starts to think about their favorite characters in the same way they think about themselves.

“When they think about a favorite fictional character, it appears similar in one part of the brain as when they are thinking about themselves,” says Timothy Broom, lead study author and doctoral student in psychology in a university release.

…

Researchers examined this connection in 19 fans of “Game of Thrones” as the group thought about themselves, their friends, and nine characters from the series. The team selected Bronn, Catelyn Stark, Cersei Lannister, Davos Seaworth, Jaime Lannister, Jon Snow, Petyr Baelish, Sandor Clegane, and Ygritte for this experiment.

…

The participants started by first revealing which character they liked the most and felt closest to. They also completed a questionnaire to measure “trait identification,” which study authors gauged by seeing if the volunteers agreed with statements like, “I really get involved in the feelings of the characters in a novel.”

“People who are high in trait identification not only get absorbed into a story, they also are really absorbed into a particular character,” Broom explains. “They report matching the thoughts of the character, they are thinking what the character is thinking, they are feeling what the character is feeling. They are inhabiting the role of that character.”

It’s natural enough to self-insert when reading or watching fiction.

Though we should probably be concerned about who is producing the fiction, and whether or not they are consciously using it to shape the thoughts and behavior patterns of the viewer.

It potentially gets quite sinister when you consider that, during the lockdown, the average American spends 8 hours a day watching TV shows and movies.

While the group was thinking of the nine characters, nine of their real-life friends, and themselves, researchers conducted a series of fMRI scans on various parts of their brains.

The OSU team says they wanted to see what happens in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC). This brain region increases activity when someone thinks about themselves. To a lesser extent, the vMPFC also tends to become active when a person is thinking of a close friend.

During the experiment, researchers randomly showed participants the name of a friend, one of the “Game of Thrones” characters, or their own name. They also showed them a specific trait, such as lonely, sad, trustworthy, or smart. The volunteers simply had to answer “yes” or “no” when seeing these pairings; allowing the MRI to do the rest of the work.

The results reveal the vMPFC is most active when a person is thinking of themselves. There was less activity when thinking about a friend and even less when evaluating the fictional characters. However, the difference is much less apparent in those who score high in trait identification.

Researchers find the brains of these individuals are particularly active when they evaluated the character they noted liking the most.

“For some people, fiction is a chance to take on new identities, to see worlds though others’ eyes and return from those experiences changed,” says Dylan Wanger, study co-author and assistant professor of psychology at OSU.

“What previous studies have found is that when people experience stories as if they were one of the characters, a connection is made with that character, and the character becomes entwined with the self. In our study, we see evidence of that in their brains.”

It’s a good thing they didn’t do this experiment on right-wingers.

We’d probably all have ended up getting arrested for crimes committed by our favorite character.

Granted, nothing released in Korea was nearly as bad as Cardi B or Ariana Grande, but we were seeing a move in that direction.

Thankfully, there is a new generation of Kpop, and it isn’t all devolving into that weird feminist empowerment rap nonsense.

The Independent (Singapore):

aespa, the rookie girl group under SM Entertainment is returning with a remake single.

The group announced officially on Jan 29 their plans to release a remake of Yoo Young Jin’s 2000 hit song Forever next week. The track will be released online on Feb 5 at 6 pm KST.

Forever will showcase an entirely different side of aespa from their powerful debut track, Black Mamba. The song is a mid-tempo ballad with an acoustic guitar sound and warm lyrics about promising forever to a loved one.

Yoo Young Jin, who first released “Forever” as part of SM Entertainment’s holiday album “Winter Vacation in SMTOWN.com” back in 2000, is said to have personally rearranged the song for the girl group, according to Soompi on Jan 29.

Black Mamba did have an element of that rap influence, but it was certainly more wholesome than much of the garbage that has been released by newer Kpop groups.

Many may not recall Yoo Young Jin, because he’s a man, but “Forever” is a classic normal pop song.

Things were looking a bit dark with the latest stuff from BlackPink, Red Velvet and (g)i-dle, but I think the release of the newest Twice song has pushed the industry back towards wholesomeness.

Everything seems to be swinging back in that direction.

IU just released a single last week that was 100% pure wholesomeness.

My call for Kpop girl group of 2021 remains Weekly.

Though they have yet to announce a new single.

Just your daily reminder that Conor McGregor is disgusting.

He’s literally a professional loser. He is a man who gets paid to get beat up, usually by colored folks.

He is never going to win, not at this level. Maybe he should be fighting Jake Paul.

McGregor is a gross cultural influence. He gives the impression that white men are weak. Yes, I hear that his latest ass-whupping was from a white guy, but what McGregor was presented as was a white man’s champion. Then he proceeded to have a downward arc in his career, and he selfishly went to fights he knew he couldn’t win, to be beaten by blacks and Moslems for a cheering media.

Conor McGregor is possibly the single worst element of the entire culture, frankly. He’s more disgusting than the “only blacks allowed” rule for television commercials (and advertisements in general). Imagine being a 5-year-old white boy right now. Imagine what is going through their heads, looking at this society.

The Jews who run the media understand the symbolism of creating a white fighting champion and then having him continually publicly humiliated.

You shouldn’t watch this stuff anymore. It’s horrible. All of it is just horrible. Even if you don’t think it’s affecting you, it actually is affecting you.

If you want to watch something, watch old John Wayne movies.