“This is what a demon great employee looks like.”

The way in which people choose to present themselves is a statement, so why shouldn’t we listen to what they have to say about themselves?

Study Finds:

Despite the fact that employment regulations state it is illegal to discriminate against a potential employee due to their sex, religion or other personal characteristics, a surprising new survey finds more than half of employers admit to still judging job applicants based on their appearance.

The research, commissioned by Greene King, surveyed 1,000 hiring managers and bosses in the United Kingdom. Overall, 51% said they have knowingly discriminated against a potential employee because of the way they looked. Of those, 43% said they didn’t hire the candidate because of their visible tattoos. Another 40% didn’t hire candidates based on their clothes, while hair color put off 30% of employers.

Can you really use that to portray those employees as the bad guys though?

Visible tattoos tell a story.

The way in which people dress also tells a story.

Hair color often tells a story many are already familiar with.

These aren’t minor things.

Similarly, about half of respondents said they can’t “look beyond” an interviewee’s physical appearance, even if they appear to be more than capable of excelling in the job they are applying for. To that effect, 21% said they didn’t hire a candidate because they had a disability.

“Employers should be open-minded and hire people based on potential, rather than just appearance,” says Greene Kine HR director Andrew Bush in a statement. “Unfortunately, our research shows many businesses still judge a book by its cover – which means those talented, intelligent and experienced applicants could be overlooked because they don’t conventionally ‘look the part’. Having a tattoo, or a piercing, doesn’t mean you are unable to do a job efficiently. Employers could be discriminating against potentially brilliant candidates.”

Still, just under a third of hiring managers also find it difficult to ignore visible tattoos when considering an applicant for a job. Visible piercings were a distraction for 28% of employers in the survey, and 25% said they can’t overlook how a potential employee is dressed for an interview.

How about we trust our eyes and guts instead?

“Don’t judge a book by its cover” is like saying that you shouldn’t evaluate whether things are food or not based on how edible they look and that instead you should be biting and chewing on everything to try and figure it out.

“Chew on everything because something may taste nice.”

It’s also a pillar of The Tranny, because judging appearances is the first step towards misgendering someone.

Judging appearances is ingrained in our biology. At its core, it is an automated process that cannot really be controlled at will.

When people think that they’re not really judging appearances, they’re actually judging appearances and using their conscious mind to override the results from the judging.

If this process didn’t exist, people would be unable to find others sexually attractive, and everyone would be doing sex stuff with everyone to “read the book” and find out if it’s good or not.

Also known as “you won’t know if you like it until you try it.”

By pure unadulterated coincidence, we live in a cultural environment that proudly states that people shouldn’t judge a book by its cover and that everyone should be tasting different genitals to Find Themselves.

The whole “oh, but what if the person is actually some kind of very capable genius” thing is silly.

What about the other capable people that don’t come with the telltales of undesirable baggage?

It’s a bit like saying “yes, she may be insane but she has a vagina.”

Normal people shouldn’t be shamed for refusing to engage with people they don’t want to engage with.

Jamie, hypothetical ideal worker

The future is female.

Daily Mail:

A list of the most important attributes employees need to thrive in the workplace has been revealed, and experience level isn’t make or break.

Medical technologies firm Stryker created a hypothetical ‘perfect’ staff member, which found personality often trumps skills.

The company identified the most useful human qualities needed for workers to succeed when working side-by-side with technology and even created Jamie – a mould of the ideal worker.

Jamie has the skills the company said workers need to be successful, such as being an active listener, agile, good under pressure and having an entrepreneurial spirit.

Agile? So the ideal worker isn’t an obese American?

Agile

The entrepreneurial spirit is key, but you don’t want too much of it lest the workers quit and start their own businesses. Women are ideal for this, as they’re known to be adept in the art of getting results by telling others what to do instead of doing it themselves.

But they’re not good under real pressure, so maybe we should inject them with testosterone to make them a little bit more like men in that regard.

Senior director of human resources Erin Cramlet revealed to Daily Mail Australia that hiring is starting to come down to emotional attributes over an impressive CV.

‘Soon the traditional resume will be dead and it will be down to the personal qualities of someone over experience,’ Ms Cramlet said.

‘For us it wasn’t that conventional wisdom of looking at resumes, it was what are those characteristics that we’re going to need from individuals and then we can train them up with new technology.

‘We don’t find the commonality in background but we find it in strengths and (personal) characteristics’.

Sounds good, right? Workplaces won’t ask for years and years of experience and references, and it will all be more meritocratic overall.

Except it won’t, because they’ll value personality, “personal qualities” and “emotional attributes” over merit, which, considering our current societal landscape, likely means that white people who don’t suffer from excruciating self-hate will be rejected on the grounds of their Nazism.

Ultimately, this is another form of dysgenics.

It provides monetary prizes to malleable, servile people.

Stryker said humans will need to perform to a higher standard and have increased brain volume as the workforce becomes more robotics and automation-focused.

‘The worker of the future will need human-centric skills in influence, negotiation and judgment,’ the company said.

‘At the same time, the rise in automation will continue to demand a greater focus on creative roles and creative skills, as well as lifelong learning to support an ever-evolving workplace.’

Men have higher brain volume than women, so it seems that their ideal worker is an androgynous being with the features they’ve picked from men and women.

Male? Female? The ideal worker.

Looking at the appearance of the average man and woman nowadays, it is clear that humans are going in that direction.

Stryker found the ideal worker more emotionally intelligent, a better active listener and collaborator.

Jamie features long and dexterous fingers, representing the perfect employee’s increasing interaction with technology, as well as agility and adaptability.

Stryker said impactful communication will become increasingly important in a worker of the future.

It’ll be all about emotions and feelings in the future.

Making men more like women and women more like men will result in the ideal sterile and disposable worker drone that will serve its hive corporation. In this context, the current push for transsexualism may or may not be a coincidence.

Stryker’s mention of higher brain volumes and the need for workers to perform at a higher standard to keep up with automation and robots may be naively interpreted as a “no blacks allowed” sign, considering that so-called people of color are significantly less intelligent than light-skinned people. However, looking at how our society encourages people to stand in-between race and gender, it is likely that the ideal worker of the future will be a gay mulatto.

Just as being entrepreneurial is a positive quality to look for in an employee but being too entrepreneurial becomes a liability, intelligence is desired but only up to a certain point. They want workers to be intelligent enough to be productive but not so intelligent that they figure out a way to get out of the farm.

If they want to farm this ideal worker drone, the lines between the sexes and races are to be blurred.