Chanel Miller is the disgusting Yoda-looking slut who falsely accused Stanford swimmer Brock Turner of rape and had his life ruined. She is now trying to profit from this rape hoax with a book.

A few years ago, Brock Turner, an all-American swimmer for Stanford University, was falsely charged with rape/sexual assault and sent to prison. He was drinking and partying with an intoxicated slut. On their way back to his room to have sex, they stumbled on top of each other where he proceeded to try and finger bang and dry hump the drunk whore near a dumpster.

Two Swedish graduate students of all people came across them. They proceeded to tackle Turner and call police. They did all this despite there being no proof that the whore was passed out and Turner’s insistence that the encounter was consensual.

The stupid Swedes should have just minded their own damn business. (Especially considering they come from a country where Moslem savages are violently raping their women on an almost daily basis. But that’s a whole other subject.)

From there, Turner had his life destroyed. The Jewish media presented him as the new face of rape. His face has literally been included in literature defining the term “rape.”

They even managed to get the sentencing judge in his case recalled because he gave Turner a lighter sentence than they demanded.

Now, this rape hoaxing whore has gone public in the hopes that she can profit from a book. Her name is Chanel Miller. She’s being praised by the Jewish media as a “survivor” even though she is not a “survivor” and was not raped.

She’s been interviewed by CBS News and they’re making a big deal about her upcoming book.

Miller was acting like your typical drunk slut at a college party, but she willfully chose to go along with the rape hoax. She claimed that she couldn’t remember anything, but claimed rape so she could avoid responsibility for behaving like a dumb whore. What happened to Turner was of little consequence to her.

Of course, the mainstream Jewish media is continuing to push the unproven narrative that she was unconscious while absolving her of any responsibility for her actions.

Here’s a small sample of the nonsense that’s being published.

NPR:

In newspapers she was described as the “unconscious intoxicated woman.” In the courtroom she was called Emily Doe. On Tuesday, she let the world know that her real name is Chanel Miller.

In 2015, Miller was attacked while unconscious after drinking too much at a fraternity party at Stanford University. Two young men on bicycles rescued her. Her attacker tried to run away but they chased him and held him down until the police arrived. Brock Turner, her attacker, was a student at Stanford and a swimming champion.

A year later, Turner was tried on and convicted of three counts of sexual assault. At the sentencing hearing, Miller read a powerful and lengthy statement about the effect the assault had on her life. She remembered little of what happened, a fact that was used against her by Turner’s defense attorney. The aftermath was devastating. Addressing Turner directly, she told him that he “took away my worth, my privacy … my confidence, my own voice.”

Miller’s statement went viral. Turner, who could have gotten 14 years in federal prison, was sentenced to six months in county jail. He served three months.

That decision, by Judge Aaron Persky, was met with outrage. Critics assailed Persky for being too lenient. Turner was a first-time offender, promising student and swimming champion. The judge said a tougher sentence “would have had a severe impact on him” — and he did not think Turner was a danger to others. He also pointed out that the victim was intoxicated. He did not mention how her life had been changed by the assault.

Critics of the decision started gathering signatures for a recall campaign. In June 2018, the campaign succeeded. Persky was the first California judge to be recalled in more than 80 years.

And then there’s all these feminist whores on Twitter praising this rape hoaxer as “brave” and “heroic.”

CHANEL MILLER—The phenomenal woman whose bravery and resilience captivated the world in the face of trauma and extreme injustice has just shown us again that she is unstoppable. She will not be broken. https://t.co/yd8d9IfDT9

— Kimberly Corban (@Kimberly_Corban) September 4, 2019

Chanel Miller, the woman who Brock Turner served THREE MONTHS in prison for raping, is a goddamn American hero and I cannot wait to read her book. https://t.co/S24DyicKLK

— ella dawson (@brosandprose) September 4, 2019

Say her name and look up to her. Chanel Miller is brave as hell, and she is more than a victim. https://t.co/gcod5LiVTa

— Emma Gray (@emmaladyrose) September 4, 2019

Chanel Miller ,Thank you for your courage and for your brilliant letter. You are helping others heal. Brava.

— Rosanna Arquette🆘 (@RoArquette) September 4, 2019

Even the Jew Monica Lewinsky, who is best known for sucking Bill Clinton’s dick in the Oval Office, tweeted her support.

dear chanel miller:
you are a brave soul. i wish you (+ your family) lightening speed healing. as you have said, you are more than the identity given to you by the media + those in power. thinking of you as you reclaim your narrative.
🙏🏻💙 https://t.co/Wp2bWjbqlD

— Monica Lewinsky (@MonicaLewinsky) September 4, 2019

This is one evil bitch we are dealing with. Not only did she destroy Turner’s life by falsely accusing him of rape, but she is now attempting to profit from the incident by going public and selling this stupid book. All because she couldn’t accept responsibility for drinking too much and whoring around at a college party.

She also has an uncanny resemblance to Emma Sulkowicz, the stupid gook-kike cunt who walked around Columbia University carrying a mattress. Sulkowicz, like Miller, falsely claimed that she was raped after having consensual sex with a German student. Her carrying a mattress around like a retard was her way to protest how her rape hoax claims weren’t being taken seriously.

What’s funny is that Anglin actually wrote an article back in 2017, predicting that the bitch hoaxing rape against Turner would be some gook-kike type person like Sulkowicz. Looks like a fairly accurate prediction if we go off of appearances alone.

Chanel Miller is some kind of Yoda-like smooshfaced brown person, with a last name that is the third most common Jewish surname in America.

This whole situation is quite the circus. It clearly illustrates how society has empowered women to make false rape claims against men if they simply regret consensual sexual encounters, or find some way to gain from them. They’ll even be hailed as heroes and invited on national television to sell a book falsely describing how they are a “survivor.” This madness is only going to encourage other women to do similar types of things.

All you men out there need to be really careful when dealing with these devious whores. It’s no joke. It just takes one crazy bitch who regrets having sex with you and your entire life can be ruined.

Jews behave in curious ways, at least to those who don’t understand the crux of their greater agenda. On the one hand, we have entities like Emma Sulkowicz and Sabrina Rubin Erdely inventing rape hoaxes to terrorize and demonize white college men, and yet on the other, we have a genuine systematic problem of universities, sports leagues, Jewish media, and jock strap sniffing local cuck police covering up the epidemic of black athletes sexually assaulting freshman students, after years of being prepped by Judah for the occasion by the likes of MTV and feminist dyke Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird.

The college campus is indeed a dangerous place for young men and women, not because the former is raping the latter, but instead because one is vulnerable to the predations of Jewish entrapment or Talmudic false witness, while the other risks getting Cosby’d in the female quest for status.

But in this new half truth (or lie) making rounds after being published first in the Harvard Crimson, the Judeo-feminist agenda of redefining rape is presented in a colorful retelling by Sephardic Jew Viviana I. Maymi.  Maymi’s account goes back to 2013, where she went out to party alone with a man who had previously shown unrequited sexual interest, got black-out drunk, and, in a fleeting moment of sobriety, later realized she was having sex with this homely man at his dorm.

While sober, she “pushed him off” (translation: the alleged “rapist” let her leave), which unleashed a series of events where she was running around the Harvard dorms fully naked until blacking out again. The next thing she remembers is waking up in a strangers dorm, perfectly safe, after making a drunken and irresponsible commotion. If a man was frantically running around the Harvard dorms naked and trashed, he would’ve woken up to tasers, blue and red lights bouncing off the wall, and a couple of pending felonies–the privileges patriarchy get you.

But missing from her piece is any mention of a police report, in fact, she herself admits she doesn’t exactly remember what happened. Nonetheless, in her mind, penalizing men for “drunken hookups” is the solution to “campus sexual assault”, and that men who themselves have a sexual encounter with a willing woman that is also under the influence are guilty of rape because it “feels” right. The self-proclaimed “strong” and “powerful” woman, in other words, suggests that women ought to have the adult right to drink alcohol, but none of the grown-up responsibilities that come with it.

Maymi’s angle here is obvious: draconian California style “yes means yes” laws that place the burden of proof on men wrongly accused of rape, all while real sexual assaults are enabled by the same Jews utilizing blacks, to the tune of 40,000 white women per year. The ultimate goal is to make every man a rapist (all sex is rape, the Andrea Dworkin definition of heterosexual intercourse) until proven innocent (except for blacks), and plant more seeds of confusion and contradiction in the Gentile host society.

In light of this revision of the definition of rape, men must begin to come forward with their own stories as well. Have you ever downed a few, taken a blowie from a fat chick, and then felt disgusted with yourself afterwards? How many of you married men out there have gotten divorce papers from your victim-shaming wives after being taken advantage of after gorging on free shots at the pub?

Share your rape story below, the Daily Stormer will soon be offering counseling services to help us overcome together.

Eric Striker (@Pr0tocolsrReal) is an anti-Semitic extremist, and regularly writes for TradYouth.

Shockingly, even Jezebel’s comments section was shocked, confused and outraged by the Chink-Jew (Jenk?) releasing a porno and claiming it was an art performance meant to show that everyone in the world raped her at once (or whatever).

Has Emma Sulkowicz bitten the hand the feeds?

Almost all of the comments are along these lines.

Honestly, I’m a bit shocked by this.  All of this feminist “performance art” crap is just emperor has no clothes meaningless gibberish, but they’ve been high-fiving each other over it for decades now.

So why are they now angered, turning against one of their own?

I could understand if she was attractive and really sexy in the video, because feminists generally hate attractive women. But she is disgustingly fat and has a horrible deformed shape.

So what gives, ladies?  Why you turning your backs on your champion?

Is your nonsensical “ideology” finally collapsing in on itself?

If you need a shoulder to cry on – cry on each others.  Or just kill yourselves.  The men are all busy trying to fix these problem you stupid little children created.

The fact that the half-kike gook (or should I say half-gook kike?) Emma Sulkowicz, better known as mattress girl, released a sex tape which she alleges is a reenactment of her rape yesterday is getting little press coverage as no one really knows how to process what has just taken place.

Sulkowicz is a Columbia University student famous for falsely accusing a German exchange student of rape and then engaging in a “performance art” act where she carried around the mattress she was allegedly raped on everywhere she went.  She called the sickening spectacle “carry that weight.”

The video shows her having normal voluntary sex with a fat old man who then rips off the condom and sticks it in her butt while holding her down.

She has it its own special website entitled Ceci N’est Pas Un Viol (“it’s not rape”), presumably because it is not allowed to upload porno to YouTube.

The site includes statements of insane gibberish, which may be some sort of voodoo curse designed to break down the psyche of anyone who reads it.

Trigger Warning: The following text contains allusions to rape. Everything that takes place in the following video is consensual but may resemble rape. It is not a reenactment but may seem like one. If at any point you are triggered or upset, please proceed with caution and/or exit this website. However, I do not mean to be prescriptive, for many people find pleasure in feeling upset.

Ceci N’est Pas Un Viol is not about one night in August, 2012. It’s about your decisions, starting now. It’s only a reenactment if you disregard my words. It’s about you, not him.

Do not watch this video if your motives would upset me, my desires are unclear to you, or my nuances are indecipherable.

You might be wondering why I’ve made myself this vulnerable. Look—I want to change the world, and that begins with you, seeing yourself. If you watch this video without my consent, then I hope you reflect on your reasons for objectifying me and participating in my rape, for, in that case, you were the one who couldn’t resist the urge to make Ceci N’est Pas Un Viol about what you wanted to make it about: rape.

Please, don’t participate in my rape. Watch kindly.

A special thank you to everyone who made Ceci N’est Pas Un Viol possible, especially my actor (*********), my director (Ted Lawson), and those I love who have guided and supported me.

That bit of full-crazy is followed by a series of questions for the watcher to consider.

Searching:

• Are you searching for proof? Proof of what?
• Are you searching for ways to either hurt or help me?
• What are you looking for?

Desiring:

• Do you desire pleasure?
• Do you desire revulsion? Is this to counteract your unconscious enjoyment?
• What do you want from this experience?

Me:

• How well do you think you know me? Have we ever met?
• Do you think I’m the perfect victim or the world’s worst victim?
• Do you refuse to see me as either a human being or a victim? If so, why? Is it to deny me agency and thus further victimize me? If so, what do you think of the fact that you owe your ability to do so to me, since I’m the one who took a risk and made myself vulnerable in the first place?
• Do you hate me? If so, how does it feel to hate me?

We all definitely hate you, you stupid bitch, and we probably enjoyed hating you before this happened, now it hurts our brains to even think about the fact that a being such as you exists in the universe.

This is like the first time the Fantastic Four confronted Galactus.

You have become an eater of worlds.

Though the intent of the video is completely unclear, some experts on Twitter are worried that she may have just “won the game.”

'sex tape is political' is meta-level. i am having a hard time processing this move. is it insanity? pic.twitter.com/Pl9MdqhEms

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) June 5, 2015

@stormer9k or have we been outfoxed? was this a successful power-grab? did she just win the game? pic.twitter.com/b7bzMACFwu

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) June 5, 2015

@stormer9k if they doubt your rape hoax because of fuck my ass texts, wait a period and release the sex tape on them pic.twitter.com/rctLzenoyM — Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) June 5, 2015

@stormer9k Will she now run for political office? would it be possible for her to take over the system?

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) June 5, 2015

@stormer9k does this signal the end? is there anywhere else to run? — Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) June 5, 2015

Certainly, we could just explain it as normal female attention whoring. But what if it is something more? What if it is a viciously calculated, brutal stratagem to bring down the entire social order?

The video was filmed by a “director,” Ted Lawson, whose previous claim-to-fame was using a robot to draw a naked picture of himself with his own blood.

The actor in the film was a professional porn actor who does fetish porn, the Lawson told The Columbia Spectator.

Is There an Upside to This Horrible Act of Violence Committed Against All Humanity?

Though the mood across earth is dark in the wake of this happening, there could be an upside.  If mass suicides don’t presently ensue.

It is possible that people will see what she has done, and realize just how abhorrent feminism is.  How seriously society needs to reconsider the concept of women running their own lives and making their own decisions.  The release of this sick porno clearly shows the depths to which a woman is willing to sink in order to make herself into a spectacle deserving of male attention, and after this it can only get worse.

The scary part is that this is all being done because this German man rejected her after having shared with her the pleasure of his organ.  A woman scorned, and all that.

But if a woman can do this, what else is it possible for her to do?  Can you even imagine?

And don’t give me that “well this is just one half-gook kike” business.  Because it isn’t.  Hordes of women across the planet – White women – are supporting this crazy bitch.  And supporting her is even more insane than being her.

Will the White Man wake up in time to stop feminism from collapsing reality in on itself?

I sure hope so.  But it may already be too late.

The lying leftists at Salon still refuse to report that Paul Nungesser is not guilty. Nungesser is the German student at Columbia falsely accused of raping hoaxtress Emma Sulkowicz, who has carried a mattress around campus as part of a bogus art project.

Salon pretends Nungesser might have done it, tossing in “alleged” in its story protect itself. [Alleged rape survivor Emma Sulkowicz carries mattress to graduation, May 19, 2015]The writer, Jenny Kutner [Email her] does not report that the police and school cleared Nungesser. Nor does she  mention that Nungesser’s lawsuit against the school [PDF] totally destroys Sulkowicz’s insane claims. The messages the two exchanged show Sulkowicz to be an enthusiastic sexual athlete, and not just with Nungesser.

Bad news for Salon. As defamation law goes, “alleged” only means that “someone else said it.” If the someone else is lying, and a publication repeats the lie, the publication is liable for defamation, even if the publication was only quoting the someone else. Salon would be in particular trouble for the post in question because Nungesser can make a good case Salon published the piece with malice. Kutner and Salon know he is innocent.

Nungesser should sue Salon and any other publication that continues to pretend his innocence is in doubt.He should also sue Sulkowicz. If he doesn’t, she’ll never stop lying about him.