A quick recap for the more casual political observer: there are generally considered three political theories out there.

The first is the oldest and the most successful – liberal bourgeois democracy.

The second is pretty controversial – communism.

And the third is considered evil incarnate – fascism.

This is a simplification – you have a lot of fancy terms and designations out there that go beyond these three systems. I don’t know them all, but whenever you hear a lefty college kid being interviewed by journalists at one street protest or another, they always pull one of those, “akshully” moments and come up with these hyper-specific definitions of what they are.

Maoist-Collectivist, or Anarcho-Trotskyist or some other goofy sounding shit.

Perhaps most famously, the Russian mystic/historian Alexander Dugin wrote what he called, “The Fourth Political Theory.”

But most people simply aren’t capable of reading through the dense and wandering book. I know. I tried. But I failed. It was hard to follow. And from what I understand, few people are like, “yeah, he totally came up with a viable fourth position.”

From what I understand, he cops out and instead talks about how the further east you go, the wilder and less degraded the people are. Borrowing some of their wild, primordial spirit is the only way to save our decayed, decadent and materialistic Western soul, which only cares about shopping and fornication.

Funny enough, it’s been tried before.

During the Russian Civil War, Roman von Ungern-Sternberg, a Prussian White Army officer, went to Mongolia where he raised a new Golden Horde to fight the Reds. He was seen as more demon or god than man. All sorts of myths swirled around him. The Dalai Lama named him the reincarnation of the God of War. If he had succeeded, he probably would have been a new Genghis Khan – who I believe was probably achshully huwhyte, but that’s another story.

Looks huwhyte to me.

Anyways, the Mad Baron certainly embodied an old world sort of mysticism mixed with Eastern shamanism and Buddhism.

And I think that’s pretty much what Dugin wants and what he likes to talk about in his confusing tracts. But as many correctly point out, Dugin’s not really into the whole race realism thing.

In fact, a lot of these esoteric “right-wing” writers like Guenon and Evola and even Spengler weren’t really into race realism like we are. They were more concerned about “spirit” and “soul” – which is not to say that they were race-blind liberals, because they were not – only, I suppose, that they didn’t feel the need to talk about race because it was generally understood at that time that race existed and no one really questioned that. It would be like asking a fish to write books about water.

Besides, racial studies and the study of IQ and that sort of empirical research was seen as materialistic and reductionist and bourgeois. 

Basically, it was stuff that only a member of the Striver upper-middle class would think about. Something only a poindexter professor or money-grubbing doctor would care about. They were concerned with matters of the spirit and the soul which was something else entirely, higher and more aristocratic as well. They didn’t have time to get bogged down in statistics and racial IQ scores, you see.

So basically, Dugin, who spent a lot of time rooting around in secret libraries of forbidden literature kept by the GRU or the KBG – I forget how the legend goes – was influenced by these guys, with their talk of soul and magic and high-level philosophy.

The “Fourth Political Theory” as it stands now is basically about reintroducing magic to politics to find purpose again.

And as cool as that sounds, I think that it’s not really what we need atm.

I propose something much simpler – that we stop looking to the heavens and outside ourselves. That we look inward instead. Deep down. To the molecular level. There we will find God – hidden away in the double-helix. Deus ex Genetica. And from there we will build outward.

With Roy’s True Fourth Theory, the great economic and political questions will be solved on day one.

Instead of arguing about whether Socialism or Capitalism is a better method or organizing our society, we will simply look at who we are talking about on a genetic level instead. We will understand that Germans are law-abiding, conformist and collectivist by nature. Through centuries of breeding. So, naturally, they will naturally be drawn towards more Socialistic forms of government and that’s what’s natural and right for them to do. Hell, I believe Marx may have been correct all along in predicting that Germany had the potential to be the first truly Communist society – it’s a shame that he didn’t predict mass Third World migration as a tool of the Capitalists to lower wages and bargaining power and stave off the handover of power to the proletariat that he thought was an inevitability…

Wrong Marx

But w/e.

Looking at the Italians, we will realize that they’re more in-group oriented, and therefore more nepotistic.

Corruption and graft will always be more of a problem down south as a result. And knowing that, it would be prudent to avoid any ambitious wealth-sharing plans with a population that naturally gravitates towards clannish behavior. This is neither good nor bad. Sure, IQ will be lower and society will function less efficiently… but at the same time, people will have safety nets in the form of extended families, and individuals will generally lead less atomized and neurotic lives.

Anglos are more individualistic and seem drawn towards Capitalism. I say, let them have it.

There’s no need to argue in universal terms anymore. Certainly not with Roy’s Great Political Theory to End All Theories. Just like everyone has a psychiatrist now who sits them down and psychoanalyzes them, so too will nations have their own team of shrinks, sitting them down and figuring out what they’re genetically predisposed towards doing.

All this is to say that I think the whole Capitalism vs Socialism vs Capitalism vs whatever debate is stupid at this point.

The real debate that will end up changing the course of human history will be whether we can grapple with and accept the implications of genetic science. Whether people, society and the cognitive elite running nations will accept race realism, and begin thinking in terms of genetic predetermination or not.

Politics needs to simply become the extension of genetics… and then everything will fall into place.

There was this great plan in continental Europe in the run-up to World War I.

Some clever Russians and Germans talked about forging a very close-knit alliance, perhaps even a union between the two countries.

The idea was simple: German industry and high civilization working in tandem with Russian raw goods and overwhelming military power.

The two would become an unstoppable geo-political block.

There were many proponents of this idea in both Germany and Russia. But there were also people who thought that this would never come to pass. Ever hear of the White General?

Skobelev was a Russian nationalist of sorts – that didn’t prevent him from conquering and incorporating Turkmenistan into the empire for shits and giggles – and a pan-slavist.

He got into big trouble with the Imperial authorities because he predicted a struggle for domination of continental Europe between the Teutons and the Slavs.

This did indeed come to pass. Twice.

But as I alluded to before, there were other forces, like the Romanovs themselves, that sought to bring Germany and Russia closer together.

Even Skobolev wasn’t really that keen on war with Germany – he just thought that it was inevitable that the two great continental powers of Europe would end up clashing in a struggle for dominance.

So basically, the idea has its adherents and its skeptics.

And there are other powers in the world that fear this possible alignment and have done everything that they can to prevent it.

If you watch nothing else, please watch this video. This is America’s Foreign Policy vis a vis Europe in a nutshell

Even in the early days of the Nazi movement, the Strasser faction was deadset on reconcilement with Russia.

Some German writers went even so far as to suggest creating a Super-race between the Russians and the Germans. Their logic was simple. The Russians were perceived to be a wilder and younger warrior race, while the Germans were perceived to be a more civilized and more intelligent builder race.

I’m really simplifying here, but that’s the general gist of some of this Strasserist vein of thought.

Many German thinkers from the formation of the German state onwards understood that Germany was essentially resource-poor and constrained by its geography and late-comer status to the game of world domination.

They saw in Russia a very useful partner.

This strain of thought never really died out in Germany or Russia. 

To this day, Putin – who speaks German, who served in Germany, who openly admires German culture, who put German relations as a priority for his government and who gave his first foreign address in German to the German parliament – is all about creating those strong economic ties of interdependence.

The most important step in this is the Nord Stream gas pipeline.

And now we have China entering the world stage as a big player.

China is bottle-necked by the US Navy and by hostile neighbors on all its borders. So they are looking for a way out of the noose that they’re already in.

Russia wants to be at the center of a new “Silk Road” that will bring together Germany, Russia and China into a continental powerhouse.

This is a HUGE geopolitical development that is happening slowly, but surely. Who knows if it will work, but if it does, it will be game-changing.

PAUSE.

Sorry to complicate this even further, but it’s worth bringing up.

Dugin.

It’s funny. The Jews say that we are part of some Duginist conspiracy on the Alt-Right, but literally no one reads Dugin either on our side or on the Liberals’ – it’s really bizarre.

So let me bring you up to speed real quick and you’ll see why he’s somewhat relevant.

Dugin talks about how history is defined by the battle between two types of powers: sea-based powers and land-based powers.

You can trace this conflict from ancient times to today.

Athens vs Sparta. Carthage vs Rome. Great Britain vs France. USA vs Russia. 

Sea-based powers focus on trade, democracy and liberal values.

Land-based powers focus on production, authoritarianism and conservative values.

In Dugin’s mind, land-based powers shouldn’t be fighting. In other words, World War I and II were mistakes. Continental Europe should have united and taken the fight to the sea-based power of the Anglo-sphere.

Many share his sentiments in Russia.

To this day, few Russians bear the German people any racial ill will. They blame an ideology -“Nazism”  – and among the more “woke” Russians, they blame an “Anglo-Jew” plot to push Hitler into a war against Russia (lol idk maybe, who knows) despite the success of the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement.

What could have been 

Nowadays, most Victory Day events have this underlying feeling of relief that permeate them, not so much a “Germans are bad people” vibe.

It’s hard to explain, but it’s basically a day where most people give thanks that they survived.

The atmosphere is hopeful, but also somber and reflective. People view the war as a necessity, but a tragic one at that.

Few bear any grudges towards modern-day Germans in either the populace or the government.

So what does this mean?

Nothing. And maybe in a decade – something.

I don’t know which faction will win out in Germany – it seems that the industrialists want closer ties to Russia because of cheap gas and access to Chinese markets. But just like the Strasser types lost out, so too might they.

I think I know who will win out in Russia- it seems like the entire political establishment is onboard with forging closer ties with Germany, so there’s that.

I definitely can see that China is gung-ho for this plan and is pouring huge money into its realization.

All that’s left is to see if the United States can disrupt it in time…

Or if the muzzies take over Germany before any of this can be implemented lmao.

Glenn Beck is trying desperately to stay relevant. It’s an uphill battle for him, for sure.

But this series on the Alt-Right might put him back in the spotlight.

New: Glenn Beck conspiracy that Russia is funding Identitarians worldwide and that Alexander Dugin is its supreme leader. (p1) pic.twitter.com/sRNMmiNVLN

— Alba Rising🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@Alba_Rising) February 8, 2018

He thinks Jared Taylor, Spencer and Generation Identitaire are footsoldiers of Russia (p2) pic.twitter.com/Cw4LEBFEq7

— Alba Rising🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@Alba_Rising) February 8, 2018

In other words, the blaze is dying, better talk about the alt-right some more. He shows 'huwhite supremacist' Jared Taylor disguised as a Frenchman at Charlottesville. 😂 (p3) pic.twitter.com/kF2EPqEKpf

— Alba Rising🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@Alba_Rising) February 8, 2018

Is there anything in modern western politics that the media won't blame on Russia? (p4) pic.twitter.com/nR35rHbrDf

— Alba Rising🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@Alba_Rising) February 8, 2018

In short, he’s pushing the the whole “Russia is funding the Alt-Right” angle.

Boomers – Glenn Beck’s audience – like this kind of stuff. Shadowy figures pulling strings and funding secret groups and all this James Bond Cold War stuff that they grew up on. Unfortunately, the world doesn’t really work that way anymore. I mean, maybe it does to a certain extent. But from what I understand, the only side that gets the benefit of shadowy networks and secret funding is the Jewish side, because it is they, not the goyim, who’ve been getting closer and closer to world domination as modernity has moved forward.

And in general, Boomers ALWAYS fail to see the forest for the trees.

Take George Soros for example. They LOVE the Soros conspiracy stuff. And to be fair, Soros IS indeed funding a lot of bad stuff around the world. But when you try to tell them that that Soros is the tip of the iceberg, that he’s Jewish and that he operates with the same goals as a powerful Jewish cabal…well that’s when you lose the Boomers.

And this is the same formula that Glenn is applying to the Right.

He’s come up with a sinister-sounding figure – a modern Russian Rasputin – and he’s going to give him the George Soros treatment, but for the Right this time instead. In other words, this Rasputin is who gives us our marching orders. He’s the one with the master plan. He’s the one providing the financing, straight from the Kremlin.

It falls right into the Boomers’ inability to see patterns.

They can’t see that non-White immigration is causing a lot of tension and that the Alt-Right is the long-overdue manifestation of White discontent. That’s a society-wide pattern, a forest if you will. They can only understand trees, like the sinister-sounding Dugin who is using Black Ops to stir up the pot.

Dugin pictured here, using his Sith powers to fund the Alt-Right

Actually, Glenn’s latest Blackboard antics remind me of his older performances for Fox.

He got fired for those because he got too close to the truth. Beck had a choice: continue onward or cuck.

Like many before him, he chose to cuck, probably helped along by a knock on the door at night from Mossad.

Now he’s done a complete 180 and spends most of his time attacking Trump and shilling for Israel. It was only natural that he would circle round to the Alt-Right eventually.

But if there’s anyone that can make Glenn break down crying again…well let’s just say he picked a fight with the wrong people.

Translated for Open Revolt by Venator

1 – The term “Orthodox Eurasianism” is increasingly used by the junta in Kiev to describe the worldview of the Republic of Novorossia. While it is clear that this element of language was designed in Washington, it is however, in my view, quite correct.

2 – Almost all historical Eurasists were Orthodox Russian patriots. However,unlike Slavophiles and Leontiev, they were skeptical about the possibility of uniting all Slavs because they felt that cultural, religious and historical differences between them were more important than their ethno-linguistic proximity. At the same time, they emphasized that Russian civilization had integrated into a unity of destiny a number of non-Slavic peoples (Turks, Caucasians, people of Siberia) which were in geographical contact us.

3 – As early as the 1990s, under our influence, Eurasianism integrated into its corpus geopolitics (thalassocracy against tellurocracy, Eurasia against the Atlantic world, Eurasians against Atlanticist) and traditionalism (Tradition against the modern and postmodern world).

4 – All of this is in fact the ideological foundation of the Republic of Novorossia. First, it is at the forefront of the Orthodox religious identity in a cultural sense (against Ukrainian nationalism and the Uniate Church and against liberal theory of human rights and protection of sexual minorities) . Secondly, there is an opposition in the geopolitical choice, Euromaïdan being purely Atlanticist. Thirdly, the Republic of Novorossia is following an anti-liberal and social orientation, and in favor of traditional values. Fourthly, the symbolic presence in the ranks of it’s army of Ossetians or Chechens volunteers, corresponds to the unity of destiny cited above.

5 – More interestingly, in the current acute civilizational confrontation causing tens of thousands of deaths, air strikes and artillery fire against the civilian population are ordered by the Atlanticist junta in Kiev in order to punish the Republic of Novorossia seen as a bastion of Orthodoxy and Eurasia opposing Atlanticism, liberalism and Nazism, while in the minds of the leaders of the Republic of Novorossia and its citizens the same pattern prevails: they are at the front line of a battle between Russia and the West, Orthodoxy and the anti-religious modernity, Eurasia and the Atlantic world.

Is there the same understanding of the situation In Russia? Yes, for the grassroot patriots, but not in the elite. A considerable part of it is liberal, Atlanticist and postmodernist. Its members do not think of themselves as citizens of a great nation, but as the inhabitants of a small country, and they are not a fifth column that would act in secret, but a sixth, openly integrated into the global network of Atlanticism, liberalism, capitalism and postmodernity. They no longer think as members of a people but only as members of this network.

6 – In Russia, Orthodox Eurasianism remains in a passive and implicit state, it does not become conscious because it does not face a direct existential and straightforward enemy. Russia is a huge country and the daily lives of Russians is filled with a myriad of technical details that do not allow most to have an overall view of the situation. Trying to raise awareness, even approximately, is as difficult as explaining a koan. But when, as in the Republic of Novorossia, citizens are faced with a will to destroy their culture, religion and ethnicity, it becomes urgent to establish their own identity. That is why othodoxe Eurasianism has grown from an implicit to explicit state. There, it is no longer a matter of words, but of war, it is a vital issue.

7 -Thus was born the dissonance between modern Russian elite and the Republic of Novorossia. There are more and more conflict between them, hence the delays and failures of concrete assistance from Russia to the Republic of Novorossia and the explanation of precedents like the failed action spin doctors (since fired ) in the Kremlin, who began to marginalize those who were conservative, patriotic, Orthodox or Eurasisans. Thus, the contradiction between the ideology of the elite of the Russian world and that of the majority of the inhabitants of Novorossia and Russia is becoming more and more apparent. The sixth column has particularly revealed itself in it’s hysterical hostility towards the volunteer army of the Republic of Novorossia, it can be clearly defined ideologically (ie by it’s cultural and geopolitical religious positions) as a rejection of Orthodox Eurasianism.

8 – Now, it is inevitable that the Orthodox Eurasianism becomes the ideological paradigm of the Republic of Novorossia. Orthodoxy is the spiritual core of identity, Eurasianism it’s geopolitical, cultural and civilizational marker. Since Novorossia, this ideology will only grow and widen the scope of it’s struggle. Accordingly, facing the Republic of Novorossia, Moscow will have to deal with the Orthodox eurasians of the Russian state. The volunteers of the Russian Federation fighting in the militia of the Republic of Novorossia, by confronting their true spiritual and geopolitical enemy, discovered that identity and they go back home with it. Now the words of the priests who officiate in Russian Orthodox churches, history and geopolitical books will be perceived differently: both as an existential issue that involves life, death and blood, and as a backbone. Thanks to those who will be engaged in the defense of the Republic of Novorossia and who experience this particular Eurasian Orthodox identity, the rest of the Russian population will learn more about its ideological identity. At the same time, the achievements of the Soviet Union will not be excluded but included in a broader context rid of orthodox Marxism, materialism and atheism. That is the Eurasian ideology: it mainly includes the legacy of orthodoxy of the Byzantine monarchy and Russian nationalism, not to mention the Russian interpretation of Soviet history as briefly expressed in National Bolshevism. Orthodox Eurasianism incorporates the theories of Ustrialov’s review “Change of direction” and integrates them in a general paradigm opposing Atlanticism, the West, liberalism and postmodernism. We can write that it is the “natural organic ideology” of the great Russian nation. Fighting every day, even in Russia, for the Republic of Novorossia, strengthens eurasian orthodox positions.

9 – This analysis explains why the sixth column in Russia is so alarmed and tries to discredit all patriotic political initiatives in favor of the Republic of Novorossia. If they fail to eradicate the new stream of Orthodox Eurasianism, it will increase its influence in Russian society and become a serious threat to the entire liberal and Atlanticist network of the Russian elite. This explains everything, including my recent exclusion from the university. We are dealing with symbolic acts that are of great importance: hitting Orthodox Eurasians is beneficial to the Liberal Atlanticists.

10 – Where is the place of Putin in this ideological pattern? He always preferred to be above the fray of liberals and conservatives, Atlanticist and Eurasists, agents of the enemy and patriots. This is his mysterious tactics. Usually Putin himself speaks ambiguously, so that his words can be interpreted either as Eurasian or as Atlanticist. Similarly, the support or opposition to Putin are not structured ideologically : his supporters and opponents are indiscriminately Eurasists, Orthodox, liberal and Atlanticist. However, the vast majority of Orthodox Eurasians are in favor of Putin and the vast majority of Atlanticist liberals are hostile to him. Putin is not fundamentally opposed to Orthodox Eurasianism as, alas, he has no objection to liberal Atlanticism. He does not reveal his own ideology. He makes evasive statements that are immediately interpreted in one way or another. Putin does not follow a straight line and it does not make sense to ask who he supports, Atlanticists or Eurasians. He is above the fray. He is now familiar in the role of the mysterious and unpredictable ruler, whose speeches are like contradictory koans, but when the time comes to act, he does what needs to be done and, in critical situations, it is always the right thing in terms of Orthodox Eurasianism.

Until recently, in the the elite, the Atlanticist liberals dominated the ideological and technological fields, and they had the media monopoly of the interpretation of the presidential speech. Now, that monopoly is in danger because of the events in Ukraine and the time has come for the Orthodox Eurasian interpretation.