Damn.

I thought this would work.

The Publica:

British Columbia is throwing in the towel on its drug decriminalization experiment just 15 months after it began. The province’s premier is pleading with the Canadian federal government to urgently recriminalize drugs — hoping the move will put an end to a spate of chaos and violence in public (including inside of hospitals) and skyrocketing overdose deaths.

Premier David Eby first decriminalized possession of upwards of 2.5 grams of illicit substances —including fentanyl, crack cocaine, and methamphetamine — in January of 2023. Eby’s far-left New Democratic Party (NDP) hailed the move as a major win for “harm reduction” and claimed that it would reduce the stigmatization of drug users. They argued that destigmatizing drug use would prompt addicts to seek treatment and lower overdose deaths. They were wrong.

Over the past 15 months, the province has seen skyrocketing drug use in public, including in restaurants, on playgrounds, and even in hospitals. Several small businesses closed because of growing crime and break-ins.

On Instagram, Safe Streets Vancouver, a self-described group of “concerned residents” took to documenting the public chaos.

During the high-risk trial, numerous frontline healthcare workers went to their unions and the media to complain about unsafe work environments in the wake of Eby’s decriminalization.

A leaked hospital memo from northern British Columbia (BC) revealed that nurses were told to not prevent patients from accessing drugs, and not to confiscate weapons or prevent drug dealers from visiting patients. The province also saw its worst year for overdose deaths: nearly seven people died of an opioid overdose each day in BC in 2023.

While the pilot project was intended to last three years, the resulting chaos and crime made the NDP scramble to address growing public backlash.

Eby asked the federal government to put an end to it on April 26. This came after Eby tried but failed to implement legislation in October of 2023 that would make it illegal to consume illicit drugs in public spaces, including on playgrounds. As reported by The Publica, the BC Supreme Court overruled Eby’s legislation, arguing that drug users have a constitutional right to use in public spaces.

It took a long while for these liberal policies to begin really ruining the lives of normal people. These people were able to promote insane gibberish like “legalizing drugs and allowing people to use them in public will reduce drug use.”

Now that so many of these policies have failed so abysmally, there is room to introduce a new way of thinking. The liberal way of thinking has become very comfortable for people, but they can see it isn’t working. Maybe the understanding that all of these things happening are all tied to a single mode of thinking is not consciously obvious to everyone, but it is certainly understood unconsciously, and now is the time when people become open to new ways of thinking.

Junkies are nearly as oppressed as trannies and niggers.

National Post:

For an NDP government that was looking to take a public stand against rising rates of drug-related disorder, the “playground” amendment was arguably among the least controversial things they could have done.

B.C. was already nine months into an unprecedented pilot project to decriminalize personal amounts of illicit drugs. Fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, meth, MDMA; so long as it was only 2.5 grams, by federal exemption it was now legal to possess illicit drugs basically anywhere in British Columbia.

The “playground” amendment — enacted on Sept. 18 — dialled it back ever so slightly. You could still possess illicit drugs without consequence, but you couldn’t do it within 15 metres of a playground, skate park or “outdoor spray pool or wading pool.” Schools and “child care facility premises” had already been written into the original decriminalization order.

According to the official text of the Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act, police were officially discouraged from arresting violators, and if anyone was found using drugs in child-centric areas, officers were instructed to “direct” them elsewhere.

That’s very authoritarian by Canadian standards.

But in an injunction issued just before the end of 2023, the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that even this most delicate check against public drug use was a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

In a Dec. 29 injunction, B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson ruled that it would impose “irreparable harm” if drug users were warned away from public areas — even if that came at the expense of public parks filled with biohazardous drug paraphernalia and other “social harms” such as “unpredictable behaviour.”

“I … accept that the attendant public safety risks are particularly concerning given that many of the restricted areas and places in the Act are frequented by seniors, people with disabilities, and families with young children,” wrote Hinkson.

This fat fuck thinks he’s doing you a favour

Nevertheless, he concluded that given the severity of the overdose crisis, those concerns had to take second place.

“I am satisfied that the suspension of the Act … can be properly characterized as a substantial public benefit,” he wrote.

It’s just a temporary injunction until March 31, but the entire decision was premised on Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In essence, Hinkson ruled that B.C.’s attempt to restrict open drug use in public areas was a violation of “the right to life, liberty and security of the person.”

This, in turn, was premised on Hinkson accepting the assertion by the plaintiff — the Harm Reduction Nurses Association — that any restriction on drug use in public areas would prompt “lone drug use” and increase the number of British Columbians dying from fatal overdoses.

“It is apparent that public consumption and consuming drugs in the company of others is oftentimes the safest, healthiest, and/or only available option for an individual,” he wrote.

According to the decision, the counter-argument provided by lawyers acting for the Province of B.C. was that the Harm Reduction Nurses Association was mostly making its case with “anecdotal evidence, unsubstantiated conclusory statements” and “layers of unattributed hearsay.”

Hinkson accepted that this might be true, so he instead based his “irreparable harm” conclusions largely on the assertions of a 2022 Death Review Panel by the B.C. Coroner Service.

The B.C. Coroner Service has long been a vocal advocate of harm reduction, including a vast ramp-up in the province’s “safer supply” initiative. Hinkson cited their assertion that “criminalizing drug use behaviour ensures an ongoing public perception that it is deviant and shameful, creating a barrier to people seeking the support they need as well as requiring people to hide their needs for fear of criminal sanctions.”

“Given the evidence before me, I find that there is a high degree of probability that at least some of the harm set out by the plaintiff will in fact occur,” he wrote in a conclusion.

At its unveiling, the “playground” amendment was endorsed by some of the province’s most emphatically pro-harm reduction municipal leaders, including Victoria Mayor Marianne Alto. “As the longer-term effects of decriminalization are assessed … it’s important to consider and take steps that specifically protect children,” she said in a statement at the time.

The context for the amendment was the fast-rising appearance of tent cities across B.C., and mounting reports of drug-related crime and disorder around such sites.

This is no doubt going to be a boon to the city.

Tourists love this kind of vibrancy.

Families take a look at these scenes, and it gives them fond memories they’ll cherish for the rest of their lives.

Just part and parcel of living in utopia

You throw in a couple million refugees from Sierra Leone, and you’ve got yourself a city in competition with Disneyland for “the happiest place on earth.”

One of the main supporters of decriminalizing drugs is an NGO called Pivot Legal Society, which is staffed by the exact kind of people you’d expect it to be

Hear that sound? That sweet, sharp sound?

That’s the train whistle blowing. We’re rolling out of patriarchal white supremacy.

Next stop?

Utopia.

Fox News:

One of the largest provinces in Canada is moving forward with a plan to become the first province in the country to decriminalize several hard drugs.

Starting on Tuesday, residents of British Columbia who are older than 18 will be allowed to carry up to 2.5 grams of drugs such as cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine and morphine, the BBC reported.

British Columbia was granted permission by the government to try out the plan for three years, when the drugs will still be illegal but those carrying less than 2.5 grams will not be arrested, charged or have the drugs confiscated.

Instead, residents carrying the drugs will be offered information on health and social services.

As of Jan. 31, 2023, adults aged 18+ in BC who possess 2.5g or less of certain illegal drugs for personal use will not face criminal charges. BC will be the 1st province to take this step to treat addiction as a health issue, not a criminal justice one. https://t.co/jAa8Ehmcqt pic.twitter.com/0yMqnvvp6k

— BC Government News (@BCGovNews) January 26, 2023

“Decriminalizing people who use drugs breaks down the fear and shame associated with substance use and ensures they feel safer reaching out for life-saving supports,” Jennifer Whiteside, the British Columbia minister for mental health and addictions, said about the plan.

Carolyn Bennett, Canada’s federal minister of mental health and addictions, said the move is a “a monumental shift in drug policy that favors fostering trusting and supportive relationships in health and social services over further criminalization”.

…

Many critics of the plan in Canada say it does not go far enough and that 2.5 grams is too low of a threshold that will not make a difference for users who consume large amounts of drugs.

“Decriminalization, to my mind, would be if you have a substance for personal use, then it’s for personal use, and the police should not have a role to play in that. … What you decide to use for your personal needs is your choice,” Lisa Lapointe, British Columbia’s chief coroner, told CBC.Some have publicly voiced opposition to decriminalizing drugs, including Chuck Doucette, president of the Drug Prevention Network of Canada, who said that “making drug use easier for them is kind of like palliative care.”

“It’s just condemning them to a slow death because of drugs, whereas if you get them off drugs, get them a life back, they can enjoy life,” Doucette said, the New York Times reported, adding that the plan is a “cop out” and that drug users should be provided help addressing the root causes “that led them to use drugs in the first place.”

This is literally just culling the population.

No one thinks this kind approach leads to less drug users or less drug deaths. The whole argument is that it’s nice. But of course, if you were a crooked elite that wanted large numbers of people dead, this is exactly what you would do.

You can then blame the victims for their own deaths.

Remember: as the bodies pile up in the streets, these people are telling you with a straight face that we are on the road to a utopia and the only thing in the way is white racism and the patriarchy.

It’s interesting that the overwhelming majority of these drug deaths are young white men, no? Seems maybe relevant. Perhaps.

Why are so many teachers stupid sluts? Multiply that by 10 when it’s women teaching middle and high school.

You’ll see this dynamic for yourself if you’re in college. Go to the section of campus for education majors (bring condoms).

Common sense would tell us that the opposite ought to be true. Authority figures should be role models for boys and girls.

But the system only obsessively filters your background for personal political beliefs Jews don’t approve of. When it comes to being immoral (depending on school district, they will overlook your criminal record) or a thot (tattoos, skimpy clothes, overall demeanor) you’re not rejected, you’re the perfect hire!

By making a field all female, having borderline personality disorder becomes a prerequisite. It leads to a dysfunctional school system, but our government wants dysfunctional citizens.

Miami Herald:

At first, Indiana high school junior Will Rogers wasn’t sure what he’d just shot on video.

He’d recorded video through a locked classroom door of a Lake Central High School teacher appearing to hide in a corner of the room around 10:30 a.m. Wednesday.

“When I actually watched the footage again and again and I just realized that my English teacher just did cocaine,” Rogers told WGN. The video, posted to YouTube, rocketed around the campus. When administrators discovered it, they notified St. John, Indiana, police.

Officers arrested teacher Samantha Cox, 24, on possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia, according to a St. John Police Department statement. The drugs involved appear to be a mix of cocaine and heroin, Police Chief James Kveton told The Northwest Indiana Times.

Lovely.

I’m not surprised when I hear about teachers fucking their students (which is mostly a female habit in 2017). Women are a lot more attracted to teenage boys than they’d like to admit. Today’s stunted birth controlled women are having a difficult time entering the adult world.

How many women do you know in their late 20s, 30s and even 40s who still think skaters and punk rockers are cool and sexy? Probably a lot.

But this? This bitch is cutting up lines and snorting them off her desk in front of her students at 10:30 am!

Oy vey why did they arrest her? Her body, her choice. She’s not hurtin’ anybody, Goy.

ISIS fuels itself with meth.

This definitely explains some of the weirder behavior. These guys are all high on it all the time, I’d imagine.

Daily Mail:

ISIS fighters are taking cheap, easy-to-make amphetamine pills that help keep them awake for days, which is fuelling the civil war in Syria.

The small tablets of the highly addictive substance Captagon are produced in Syria and is widely available across the Middle East.

It is thought that the trade of the drugs brings in millions of dollars in revenue to Syria, providing funding for weapons and ammunition.

Meanwhile the drug itself helps ISIS fighters stay alert and on their feet for days at a time during long, gruelling battles.

The drug was first produced in the West in the 1960s to treat hyperactivity, narcolepsy and depression, but by the 1980s was banned in most countries because of its addictive properties and no longer has a legitimate medical use.

Its active ingredient, fenethylline, is metabolised by the body into the stimulants amphetamine and theophylline.

Lebanese psychiatrist Ramzi Haddad says the drug has the typical effects of a stimulant.

He explained: ‘It gives you a kind of euphoria. You’re talkative, you don’t sleep, you don’t eat, you’re energetic.

‘Production is cheap and simple, requiring only basic knowledge of chemistry and a few scales.’

Syrian state media regularly mention Captagon pills, which sell for between $5 and $20, as one of the items government forces seize alongside weapons when they capture rebel fighters or raid their bases.

A drug control officer in the central city of Homs said he had observed the effects of Captagon on protesters and fighters held for questioning.

He told Reuters news agency: ‘We would beat them, and they wouldn’t feel the pain. Many of them would laugh while we were dealing them heavy blows.

‘We would leave the prisoners for about 48 hours without questioning them while the effects of Captagon wore off, and then interrogation would become easier.’

It isn’t just ISIS that uses this. Arabs generally are obsessed with meth. All of these riots and protests you see, you can be sure that meth plays a role. Not that Arabs wouldn’t riot either way, but naturally they would eventually get tired and go home.

Thanks to meth, the Allah riot never ends.