drug addiction – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png drug addiction – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 What the Heck is a “Narcoterrorist”? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/08/what-the-heck-is-a-narcoterrorist/ Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000

I’ve been eating massive amounts of cheese lately. And I’ve been dealing with the skin problems that go along with it. I am in fact on the verge of turning into some type of Cronenbergian monstrosity as a result of the amount of cheese I am consuming. And yet, there is no one who is going to threaten to imprison me or blow up my boat because I’m abusing myself with cheese and on the verge of going full Videodrome as a result.

This whole concept of certain drugs being illegal is nonsensical. Where did the government get the right to tell people what they are allowed to put into their bodies? How can a democracy government, which is ostensibly based on the concept of personal human autonomy being a high metaphysical concept, have such a right? Telling people what they are permitted to do with their own bodies in the privacy of their own home is a violation of the most basic principles of human autonomy that are enshrined in the enlightenment philosophy democracy is based on.

Please note: I don’t necessarily support democracy or enlightenment values, and in fact I don’t support them, but I do think if you’re going to have a system based on these things, it needs to live up to its own stated principles, otherwise you just have tyranny.

What makes drug prohibitions extra ridiculous is that you are allowed to consume all sorts of things that will kill you, including sugar and seed oils. To take it one massive step further, the government allows for corporations to put chemicals into your body that you don’t want to be there. There is PFAS in the groundwater anywhere in this country at sea level. I mean, maybe not somewhere out in some forest, but anywhere in the zone of a major metro, there are PFAS in the groundwater. Here’s a map:

So if you have a property, which you “own” – you don’t really own it because property taxes exist meaning all forms of land ownership in the US are actually rentals from the feds, but that’s a digression – you can dig a well, and you will be drinking poisonous chemicals that someone else put into your water against your will. There is no way to produce and distribute PFAS without them ending up in the groundwater, but I never hear libertarians talk about how this is a violation of property rights. It obviously is an extreme violation of property rights. They even have some widely used anecdote about polluting rivers being against the non-aggression principle (NAP). But find one of them saying it should be illegal to produce and distribute PFAS because no matter what they are going to end up in the groundwater of people’s private property.

Further, these chemicals are also in the rain. Almost everywhere in the world has PFAS levels “beyond safe levels” (as if there are safe levels) in their rain. That means it is in all the food you eat. You can’t grow food with PFAS ground water or rain water and not end up with PFAS in your vegetables and fruits. It’s also in meat, because the animals drink water contaminated with it.

And PFAS is just the most obvious. Everything is also filled with microplastics that you have no choice but to consume, and which the government has zero interest in protecting you from. No interest, at all. You hardly even hear it talked about. Bobby Kennedy was talking about it, but now he only talks about “the disease of antisemitism.”

Then you have the coronavirus vaccine that the government tried to force you to take. It was an experimental gene therapy. They wanted to force you to take it. They also try to force you and your kids to take all kinds of other strange vaccines.

And yet, they reserve the right to tell you can’t put chemicals in your body that you, as a sovereign adult person, choose to put into your body, if those chemicals are arbitrarily listed on their “illegal substances” list. This is not reasonable.

Please note: I have in the past been against marijuana legalization and I am now calling for legalization of all drugs, including fentanyl and whatever other boogieman drug. So let me explain my change of opinion on this matter.

First, I should note that I was against marijuana legalization because I think marijuana is the worst of all the drugs. It was also clear that legalization increased use. However, that seems to be a result of it having been illegal to begin with. People will take much more dangerous substances than marijuana because the government tells them they are good and safe. So when the government says “oh we decided marijuana is safe after previously having said it wasn’t,” the public, conditioned to believe the government is their daddy who will decide what is good for them, decide they should start smoking weed because the government says it’s safe now. If it had never been made illegal in the first place, there wouldn’t have been an increase when you made it legal, would there? Because you wouldn’t be making it legal, because you’d never made it illegal.

No one ever heard of a “heroin addict” when every medicine cabinet in the country held a bottle of it.

In terms of the rest of the drugs, I don’t think people think they are safe. Well, maybe people don’t think cocaine is dangerous. People now know ketamine is dangerous because they’ve watched Elon Musk’s behavior and no one on earth has a goal of “acting more like Elon Musk.” Aside from being generally disgusting and weird, Musk thinks he is funny and he is not funny yet he goes around making “jokes” like he is funny and that is the saddest thing of all, and the number one thing no one wants to be, and it’s probable that his use of marijuana and ketamine play a major role in making him like that.

Fentanyl kills all kinds of people, so no one is going to think that is safe.

With marijuana, when they legalized it, they said “oh we decided this is safe, so you, the children of us, the daddy government, are now allowed to safely smoke it.” That is disgusting messaging, and if they are going to legalize all drugs, they should say “look, none of this shit is safe. Most of it is probably safer than the poisons we put in your food or these vaccines we coerce you into taking through threats and manipulation, but these drugs are not safe and we don’t advise anyone to take them, but you’re adults and you can do what you want to do.”

This is the only thing that makes any sense.

The “drug war” has been going on since the 1960s, and there are more people on drugs than ever, and the outlawing of drugs has created a massive, violent industry trafficking these drugs that is a complete nightmare. Now, the peace president is murdering randos and threatening to start a full-on war to protect American citizens from their own choices.

You can’t protect people from their own choices. That is an insane doctrine. And again, all of this other stuff that kills you is already legal. Do you think it is healthier to be morbidly obese because you consume poisoned food that the government refuses to regulate or to do cocaine on the weekends? Obviously, there is nothing less healthy than being morbidly obese. Chronic cocaine use might cause heart problems, and it seems like it does, but not to the degree that obesity does. Obesity causes every negative health outcome.

I would support warning labels. There are warning labels on cigarettes, but none on food products that contain refined sugar/HFCS and/or seed oils (along with the prerequisite doses of PFAS and microplastics), despite those things being much more dangerous than cigarettes. You could put warning labels on OTC fentanyl and the rest of the drugs. That’s fine and fair enough. But beyond telling you these things are unhealthy and not recommended for recreational use, the government should not have a role in telling you what you can and can’t consume.

Conversely, you could also remove the warning labels from cigarettes, so people would stop expecting the government will warn them if something is unhealthy.

Here’s the important part of my legalization plan: along with legalizing the drugs, I would outlaw any and all junkie behavior. I would do a very severe crackdown on homelessness and panhandling and all of the other things associated with abuse of drugs. Vagrancy, loitering, other public nuisance behavior. Like, I’m talking ten year prison sentences for this sort of thing. Because while you do have a natural right to consume whatever chemicals you want, because you’re an adult and you have a right to make your own decisions, you don’t have a right to infringe on other people with society-destroying behavior like living on the streets and begging. Right now, we have the opposite, where the drugs are illegal but all of the bad behavior associated with drug use is legal and seemingly encouraged in many jurisdictions.

Drugs Never Killed Anyone

Conservatives are pretty clear on the fact that guns are inanimate objects and that a gun never kills anyone, but rather a person who aims a gun at another person and pulled the trigger kills someone. The fact that they are not able to apply this same logic to drugs is baffling. Drugs are inanimate objects. If someone dies from drugs, it is because they made the decision to consume the drug in an irresponsible dose.

The oxycontin debacle is an issue of false advertising. Purdue Pharma told people that oxycontin was “safe” for “pain relief,” and it turned out it was engineered and intended to be extremely habit-forming. I can see that this is a problem. It would be similar to a gun manufacturer saying “you can shoot yourself in the head with this gun and nothing bad will happen.”

But regardless of the Purdue false advertising campaign, the oxycontin cum heroin cum fentanyl “crisis” is still not a supply issue. It is a demand issue. You cannot solve a demand issue by limiting supply. At least, I think that is some kind of economic principle or whatever, I don’t actually know, I’m not an economist. But in this specific case, it is just obvious that the only thing you can do in terms of solving demand by limiting supply is drive up prices of drugs which leads to endless petty crime to pay for the drugs. At this point, it is obvious that the supply can’t be completely cut off, or even meaningfully reduced.

Trump has cracked down on the border. It’s sort of irrelevant at this point, since most of the people who wanted to come to America are already here, but he has closed the border. Have drug prices gone up due to this attempt at strangling the supply?

With fentanyl, you have a whole new reality on the supply side. With heroin, you had to grow the shit in Afghanistan and then traffic it to the West. Fentanyl is just made in a lab, and it is insanely easy to make. It costs almost nothing. Right now, it is cheapest to make it in Mexico and then take it across the border, but it is so cheap to make that you could also make it anywhere and then just mail it to the United States. I’ve read that based on the production costs, if you send it through the mail and 99 out of 100 packages get seized, you still make a profit on the 1% that gets through. And people could be making this in the US. They just don’t, because as of right now, it is cheaper to do it in Mexico or to mail it from wherever.

Here’s the thing: if you can’t stop the supply, and you want people to do less drugs, then you need to address demand. What is the demand? Why are there so many people who want to take these drugs? Well, presumably it is because their lives are miserable, and drugs work to help them escape from that misery.

It’s widely known that soldiers in Vietnam did a lot of heroin. Here’s a fun factoid for you: 95% of the boys who were “addicted” to heroin in Vietnam stopped cold turkey when they came home. This obviously proves the fact that this whole theory of “addiction” is a complete hoax. These are not magical substances that take over your body and remove your free will, forcing you to use them against your will.

Here’s another fun factoid. The whole “addiction theory” had as one of its primary pillars a rat study, where a rat was given one water bottle with normal water and one with morphine or cocaine-laced water, and the rat just kept drinking the drug water until it OD’d. Then, in the late seventies – i.e., a very long time ago – someone called Bruce K. Alexander said that these studies of the rat overdosing on drugs all had a situation where the rat was in a small metal cage, completely alone with nothing to do. He hypothesized that if you created a better environment for the rat, the rat would respond differently to the availability of drugs. He created “Rat Park,” where the rats had a cage 200 times the size of the ones used in the original studies, filled with toys and fun things rats like, as well as other rats to socialize with and have sex with, then added the same options of normal water, morphine water, and cocaine water. Shockingly to drug warriors and probably to no one else, the rats did not become “addicts” and kill themselves with the drugs. They would sometimes use the drugs, just for a bit of fun, but they would use them rarely and none of them OD’d. This proved – or at least went a long way towards proving – that the opposite of the “addiction” theory was true, that drugs are not “addictive” in the sense they are claimed to be addictive, and people do drugs because of life problems.

With the oxycontin thing, no one can deny that giving out very strong opiates because someone has a sore back and telling them it was totally safe was ethical. However, who became “addicted”? It was almost exclusively people in small rural towns that had no jobs due to deindustrialization. Without a job, you probably don’t have a wife and kids either, so why not get high? Seriously, why shouldn’t someone in that situation just get high and relax? Imagine you live in a small shithole town, you have no work, you have no wife, you have nothing at all to do: why is it not totally obvious that you would get high?

The current fentanyl crisis is more urban, while the original oxycontin crisis was much more rural, but what is the same is that it is all people who do not feel they have any future. Taking drugs is a choice, and it is a choice made exclusively by people with bad lives. You do not hear stories of well employed and happily married fathers with good diets and gym routines becoming addicted to opioids or any other hard drugs.

It’s worth mentioning that basically everyone in this country is on some kind of mind-altering drugs. Most of them are legal. You can get amphetamine prescribed in a fifteen minute session with a psychiatrist by telling them you have a hard time concentrating, and hardcore tranquilizers by saying you feel anxious. You can take the amphetamines in the daytime and tranquilizers in the nighttime. SSRIs are also still very popular, with around 15% of Americans on them, despite the huge amount of data on how destructive they are, and the whole “chemical imbalance” theory having been completely debunked to the point where no one has the nerve to cite it anymore. Something like 99% of American men use pornography, which, as I’ve explained elsewhere, is not about sex, but is a drug used to flood the brain with dopamine (up to ten times more than other “pleasurable” activities, including real sex).

The reason there is a drug problem in America is that a lot of people have bad lives. They are bowling alone, they are poor, they do not have good family situations. Drug use is also high among famous people, because despite the fact everyone wants to be famous, actually being famous is the most stressful possible life anyone can have. Or, one of the most stressful possible lives. Being an out of work coal miner in a shithole town with no young people where 2/3rds of homes are unoccupied is also very stressful.

If you could stop the supply, that already would have happened. The drug war has been going on for decades now and there are more drug addicts than ever. And attempting to stop the supply is unbelievably destructive, and leads to all of the worst possible outcomes.

What the Heck is a Narcoterrorist?

As you’re no doubt aware, Donald Trump blew up a small gas-powered boat in the Caribbean under the premise that it was carrying drugs to the United States. Or rather, it is claimed that this happened.

I don’t know that I really believe it happened. I think the video might be AI. Nothing about it makes any sense at all.

Most obviously, you could not drive that boat 2,000 miles to America. That is nonsensical on its face, and it was incredibly surreal to me that this claim was made and that people believed it. I guess most people don’t know much about boats. I know a couple things about boats. But it really doesn’t seem like you would need to know much about boats to know that what amounts to a large dingy with outboard gas powered motors cannot travel thousands of miles through open ocean.

The boat was 40-foot long, reportedly with three outboard motors. Speaking with AI on the topic, the trip from Venezuela to Florida would require between 900 and 2,000 gallons of gas. The AI concluded:

Therefore, a 1,000-nautical-mile range at 90 knots with triple outboards is not feasible with current marine technology due to insurmountable fuel consumption demands.

Although it was obvious to me on its face that this claim of that boat in the photo making this trip, which is 1,200 miles as the crow flies as closer to 2,000 miles in practice, was not at all possible, I did a lot of research, asking the AI and then reading source material, and I can confirm that there is simply no possible way that boat was driving from Venezuela to Florida.

This type of boat can be used in drug trafficking, though not typically directly from South America. Even on much shorter trips, go-fast boats require refueling. If this boat was making the trip, it could have been tracked to wherever it was going to refuel instead of blown up. This reminds me of the “Chinese spy balloon” situation, where instead of downing the balloon and investigating it, proving it was a “spy balloon,” they blew it up so no one could ever prove it wasn’t a “spy balloon.”

Though we don’t know exactly where the boat was when it was blown up, Marco Rubio initially said the boat was headed for Trinidad, which is literally right off the coast of Venezuela.

So, although we are not being told where the boat was, presumably, the fact that the Secretary of State said this (he presumably had been briefed on the location) means that the boat was somewhere between Venezuela and the Trinidad and Tobago when it was blown up. To then say that they knew it was headed for America…

….without providing any evidence or explaining how they know that, is quite remarkable in its absurdity. Like, it is actually unbelievable that they are making this claim, and it is even more unbelievable that people on Twitter are going along with it, and actually using the term “narcoterrorists.”

The other very insane thing about this is that there were 11 people on the boat. Why would you bring 11 people on a drug run? Wouldn’t you want to fill the boat with drugs? I mean, especially given the fact you need to bring thousands of gallons of gas, you would think you would want to keep some room for the drugs.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the president isn’t allowed to just murder people by blowing up their boats in international waters. If they thought they had drugs somehow headed for America, they could have just stopped the boat. There are warships and 4,000 marines and sailors off the coast of Venezuela right now, so there were plenty of people who could have hopped over to this boat and checked out what was going on with it. Just blowing it up with an attack helicopter is fucking insane.

It’s possible that they did just blow up some random boat of people traveling from Venezuela to Trinidad. But I also think it’s possible it is just a fake video they released. Thus far, there are no family members coming out and saying “hey why did you kill my family member on that boat, Donald?” and I think it would be a problem to just blow up a random boat because someone’s family members would complain, and Maduro could bring out the family members to talk about it. So it makes more sense to me it was just an AI video.

You might be saying then: if it was AI, why did they make it so stupid? Why did they show a boat that can’t possibly make that trip, why did they include 11 people on it, which makes no sense? And the obvious explanation is that they want people to go along with something that makes no sense.

People are obliging.

Stephen Crowder says you’re committing treason if you don’t support this.

There are millions more of these tweets. You can go check.

They are all using this new term “narcoterrorist.” No one had heard of this a week ago, now it is just being thrown around like it’s an established thing. This is more face-numbing stupidity. “Terrorism” means using violence against civilians to a political ends. The goal of narcotics trafficking is to make money. There is nothing political about it. They are using the word because legally, it gives them more power to act under the Patriot Act. (It also sounds much scarier, I’m sure.) Though it is still definitely illegal to just blow up random boats in international waters.

Was Cocaine Even the Problem?

I thought we had a fentanyl crisis, not a cocaine crisis. I thought the whole thing was that “Mexican cartels” were running fentanyl and also China was somehow responsible. But if it’s now about cocaine, that is in itself confusing, but Venezuela is not a cocaine country. They are now going around claiming Maduro is running a drug gang?

I’ve looked it up, and I can’t even find Venezuela mentioned in anything about cocaine. Government studies and a CSIS report agree that 98% of cocaine in the US comes from Colombia, with the other 2% coming from Bolivia or Peru.

I’m sure some of the Venezuelan gang members that flooded the country under Joe Biden’s open borders policy were dealing cocaine in America. But those were people Maduro let out of prison to come to the US. Biden announced an open borders policy, and as is reasonable enough in my estimation, Maduro opened the prisons and sent all his country’s gang members to America. The US had been threatening him with regime change since he took power, and if you’ll remember, under Trump 1, Macro Rubio and Mike Pompeo were doing this insane thing where they picked some random guy and said he was the real president of Venezuela. It was just as bizarre as the rest of this stuff.

Sometimes it feel like nothing even makes sense, no? Honestly, I don’t blame people for just shutting down and shutting off, because there is just this constant flow of utter nonsense, delivered with total seriousness, and it can truly make one feel like they are going insane. I have a bit less sympathy for the Trump people who are cheering on all of this lunacy. I guess I have some sympathy for the average person who is caught up in it, as they are just dumb and helpless and being abused. But these conservative commentators are the absolute scum of the earth. Stuff like the above Stephen Crowder tweet is truly unforgivable.

Clearly, Trump’s people want some kind of “win,” and someone, presumably Marco Rubio, is claiming that they can pull off a regime change in Venezuela. There are 4,000 marines and sailors off the coast now, in warships. You can’t do a regime change with that army, and you don’t need that army if you’re going to try to do an assassination. If you wanted to do an assassination, presumably you would not want it to be completely obvious that you did it, and if Maduro gets assassinated while there are American warships hovering around, it will be obvious who did it. So, who knows what the plan is. I guess they are just trying to create some kind of panic in the country.

It is infuriating that the declared fight against Sino-Mexican fentanyl is now a fight against cocaine in a country that doesn’t produce any cocaine. Because I follow this stuff close enough to understand it is all just lies, I don’t worry about being driven insane by it, but it is so outrageous it is difficult to maintain composure. The fact that I am one of the only people who is actually going to be able to explain these things in a clear and concise way that people can understand, and I am completely out of the game, makes it all the more frustrating.

It seems that the overwhelming majority of Americans get some kind of sadistic thrill from the government killing people. Everyone clapped seeing that boat blown up, without having any information, without asking why it makes no sense. Apparently some of the liberals didn’t clap, but they clap when random apartment buildings in Moscow get drone attacked. This probably relates back to the drug problem. People’s lives are completely meaningless, so they embrace depravity. Abusing drugs and sadistically cheering people you don’t know being murdered for reasons you don’t understand are both coping behaviors of very unhealthy people.

This Isn’t Going Anywhere Good

Part of why I cut back on my output on the Daily Stormer is that I really just don’t have very much nice to say. I don’t see any solutions to anything, and I’m not willing to go around pretending there are solutions in order to try to get some crypto donations. This Venezuelan boat bombing, the purely nonsensical nature of it, and the even more nonsensical public response, epitomizes just how far gone this country is. The Ukraine war also does that. As does basically everything else that happens.

The one glimmer of hope I can see is the backlash against the genocide in Gaza, and the backlash against the larger Jewish project in the Middle East. But the thing about that is, “at least people are willing to say they are against mass murdering children” is not super encouraging. It doesn’t prove much.

As the reader is aware, I am hopeful about the US empire collapsing and China taking over as the world’s premier superpower. This is  inevitable in the long term, but there is a high chance things will get much worse before that happens. The fact that the entire leadership in Washington is insane, and that the emerging competing elite in Silicon Valley are even more insane, is not encouraging. The plan right now appears to be to install James “JD Vance” Bowman as the next president, which will allow for a full merger of the Silicon Valley elite with the Washington elite, given that Bowman was groomed by Peter Thiel for this role.

These Silicon Valley people are insane on a whole other level. The “Christian Zionist” cult which had its moment in the spotlight after 9/11 is perhaps made to look sane by the religious cult that controls Silicon Valley. These people believe, legitimately, that they are going to make an “artificial general intelligence” computer super mind that will solve every problem and allow them to live forever and conquer the universe. Thiel, who is a homosexual, is now claiming to be a Christian himself and he is obsessed with the antichrist (???). His heretical Christian doctrine is that God wants us to perfect our bodies on Earth. People believed the “God wants us to support the Christ-killing Jews and murder all these Arabs” heresy, so they will presumably believe this one too.

I don’t see any room for any kind of progress here. Probably, that is why I am still banned, even while so many other people have been unbanned. I think the pro-China message has become the third rail. As long as people are talking about American politics as if they matter, there is no actual threat to the system, because you are engaging the system and giving it legitimacy even if you are against it. All of this material, even the strong anti-Israel and sometimes even anti-Jewish sentiment just feeds into this nonsense machine, while also providing much needed data for the AI super-systems that are being built.

As I’ve said, writing books is going to be a better way for me to communicate while I am still under these ultra-extreme censorship sanctions. I am writing multiple books now, and I think once I get one finished and published, I’ll get to rolling, and be able to pump out the same word count I was putting out on the site in book format. Although I’m clearly a well-established writer, moving to book format is something of a leap, and it’s a process I’m going through.

I just want to make it clear that although I am very negative on most things I would normally have been talking about, I’m optimistic in the long run, and I am seeing a lot of good things happening on the world stage. God willing, most of us will live to see a better future.

]]> Smart Colombian President Spits Straight Facts: Cocaine is No Worse Than Whiskey https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/06/smart-colombian-president-spits-straight-facts-cocaine-is-no-worse-than-whiskey/ Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Colombia’s president calls for cocaine legalization – “It’s as good as whiskey!”

Gustavo Petro sincerely believes that prohibition is only being upheld because cocaine is made in Latin America. At the same time, the Colombian leader is sure that since the powder is produced and… pic.twitter.com/oZeIzLcou0

— NEXTA (@nexta_tv) February 5, 2025

If it were not for the blacks using cocaine to make crack, there wouldn’t really be a viable argument for banning cocaine.

It’s certainly nowhere near as dangerous as marijuana. Virtually all marijuana use is habitual, with users using it every day, whereas cocaine is not especially habit-forming, and is usually only used at parties or with friends on the weekend.

Cocaine can cause serious health problems, but so can virtually every type of “food product” sold in the United States.

I don’t encourage the use of cocaine, but people must have some kind of freedom.

RT:

Colombian President Gustavo Petro has claimed that cocaine is no worse than whiskey, arguing that the drug’s illegality stems from its Latin American origin rather than its effects. Petro made the remarks amid tensions with US President Donald Trump’s administration over deportation policies and recent threats to impose trade tariffs.

Colombia has long been associated with cocaine production, with significant portions of the global supply originating from the country. The drug is made from the leaves of the coca plant, native to Latin America.

“Cocaine is illegal not because it’s worse than whiskey, but because it’s produced in Latin America,” Petro said during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday. The president apparently used whiskey for the comparison because the US is a leading producer and exporter.

Petro went on to argue that the “business” from criminal organizations engaged in drug trafficking could be “easily dismantled if cocaine were to be legalized around the world.”

“It could be sold like wine,” he said, claiming that the profits could be used to prevent underage consumption.

It was sold like wine, historically.

That was never considered a problem.

Why did it become a problem?

Because there was a lot of money to be made, and a lot of freedom to be stolen from the American people, by declaring a “drug war.”

These people in the US government do not care about your health. They allow every kind of poison to be dumped into your water supply, they allow food companies to sell you poison with no warning label, they try to force inject you with experimental gene therapy. There simply is not a serious argument that these government people are so concerned about your health that they have to protect you from cocaine by sending you to prison to deal with the blacks.

Drug abuse is a social problem. It is not a legal issue. Junkies should be imprisoned because they are a cancer on society, but that should not impinge on everyone else’s freedoms, nor should drug laws be used to create a massive criminal underworld that the federal government is able to make billions from.

The “drug war” is a result of the establishment of all of these intelligence agencies that effectively function like secret societies and operate as criminal gangs. If cocaine was the same price as coffee, no one would be making billions of dollars off of it, and if it were legal, private prisons would have a serious deficit of inmates.

This whole drug thing is yet another gigantic scam, especially when it comes to cocaine.

Fentanyl possession being a crime is a lot easier of an argument to make, but its effectively been decriminalized, while the US government somehow blames China for the fact that we’ve got junkies all over the streets making a complete mess.

Marijuana use is encouraged among the youth, despite the fact that it makes people into zombies.

None of this is designed to help you or your health. The entire US government operates as a criminal gang intent on harming the US population as much as they possibly can, so even engaging with it as if it is a serious institution in any way leads to ridiculousness.

]]> Oregon Cities Want to Ban Psychedelic Mushrooms After Bizarre Experiment Fails https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/11/23/oregon-cities-want-to-ban-psychedelic-mushrooms-after-bizarre-experiment-fails/ Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Government be like: “maybe we should give people psychedelic mushrooms for their mental health? I heard it on a podcast, it will probably work.”

AP:

Drug reform advocates hailed Oregon as a progressive leader when it became the first in the nation to legalize the therapeutic use of psilocybin, the compound found in psychedelic mushrooms.

But four years later, voters in a growing list of its cities have banned the substance.

Four cities, spanning Portland suburbs and rural and coastal towns, added new voter-approved prohibitions for the federally illegal compound in the Nov. 5 election. A dozen other communities that approved two-year moratoriums in 2022, when a majority of Oregon counties and over 100 cities voted to temporarily or permanently ban psilocybin, voted in this election to make the restrictions permanent.

In the wake of the fentanyl crisis, the rejection of drug liberalization measures in Oregon and states across the country this election has some experts questioning whether voters are rethinking their appetite for such policies.

You would have to assume so.

In Massachusetts, for example, voters rejected a measure that would have allowed residents over 21 to grow and use plant-based psychedelic drugs in certain circumstances. All three states that had measures to legalize recreational marijuana voted against it.

Oregon voters, in particular, appear to have soured on drug reform. A law passed by voters four years ago that decriminalized the possession of small amounts of hard drugs, including heroin and methamphetamine, was rolled back by the state legislature earlier this year after heated debate over whether it played a role in a spike in public drug use and deaths.

How would legalizing drugs not increase use?

What sort of retard would this not be obvious to?

 

“Perhaps the fact that the drug policy reform pendulum appears to be swinging back towards prohibition is part of a broader trend toward a preference for ‘law and order’ among American voters,” said Josh Hardman, founder of Psychedelics Alpha, a consulting firm and newsletter on psychedelic research, business and policy. “Oregon, specifically, has been touted as an example of liberal drug policies gone wrong.”

That’s exactly what is happening. America is doing a full-swing back to conservatism. America does everything in extremes, so this is likely to be an extreme swing.

The woke stuff was so extreme, and left such a bad taste in everyone’s mouth, that this kind of swing was inevitable.

Honestly, I’m not even sure psychedelic mushrooms are that big of a deal, but as stated above, people are reacting to the legalization of marijuana and hard drugs and the terrible effects of that.

 

The youth, which has been raised on woke garbage since they were suckling babes, is going to be at the forefront of pushing back against this gay, feminism, anti-white, junkie agenda.

The Democrats are all now saying that they went too far with weird tranny shit everyone hates. They aren’t even talking about the “defund the police” shit they pushed. Kamala Harris’ entire campaign was based on “law and order” and closing the border, with the only real leftist policies she promoted being abortion and endless war.

All of these left policies have created a dystopian hellscape where people have neither freedom nor safety, and it was just obvious that the population would not tolerate this state forever.

The swing back is going to be epic.

]]> Homeless Scum Likely to Have Ignited Weekend Fire in Brooklyn’s Prospect Park https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/11/11/homeless-scum-likely-to-have-ignited-weekend-fire-in-brooklyns-prospect-park/ Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000

A brush fire in Prospect Park, Brooklyn, was quickly contained thanks to seamless coordination between @NYPDnews, @FDNY, and @nycemergencymgt, all leveraging cutting-edge drone tech. This multi-agency response blends years of experience with modern tools, ensuring our communities… pic.twitter.com/kpajHeWJO5

— NYPD Deputy Commissioner, Operations Kaz Daughtry (@NYPDDaughtry) November 10, 2024

America doesn’t have mental hospitals anymore, other than for wealthy people.

Instead of interning the seriously mentally ill, they are encouraged to live on the street and create problems.

Sometimes they start fires.

New York Post:

Homeless people camped out in Brooklyn’s Prospect Park may have ignited the weekend blaze that torched two wooded acres in the urban oasis, The Post has learned.

Law-enforcement sources said there are indications that vagrants staying in a remote part of the park might have accidentally sparked the flames, which later engulfed a rolling meadow known as the Nethermead.

Fire officials said Sunday that they still have no official cause of the Friday night brush blaze.

It took more than 100 firefighters to snuff out the fire, which exploded during a lengthy stretch of historically dry weather that’s left the parched landscape primed for burns.

“It’s a very labor-intensive operation,” an FDNYrep said of efforts to contain the blaze. “It’s just this steep terrain, windy conditions. The fire can move rapidly.”

Several locals told The Post that they’d seen the homeless camped out in the area and that they wouldn’t be surprised if they were the cause.

“There are at least five encampments where these guys hang out,” said Thomas Mason, a retired 56-year-old who lives nearby, on Sunday.

“Sometimes there’s more. … Nobody really goes into these wooded areas except for the homeless guys,” he said. “The park rangers come through here but in cars. And they only hand out dog-walking tickets — you know, for a dog off the leash.”

Max Shamash, a 33-year-old artist from Fort Greene, said he’d taken a look at the burn site on top of the hill and noted that it was littered with trash.

“There’s hundreds of beer cans, suitcases, baby carriages, AC units — it’s like a junkyard that burnt,” he said, adding that there were also a “bunch of spray-paint bottles that exploded.”

It could have been an accident, I suppose.

But why are all of these homeless people camped out like this?

What sort of country allows this?

It’s a rhetorical question. This is a democracy, and homeless drug addicts and mentally ill people running around everywhere causing chaos is not only our values, it’s who we are.

]]> LA: “Charities” Giving Junkies Free Crack Pipes https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/11/11/la-charities-giving-junkies-free-crack-pipes/ Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000

This is good for the economy.

You hire a street person to smoke crack, hire a social worker to pass out the pipes, you’ve created two jobs.

New York Post:

Are you a junkie in Skid Row who just got a bag of crack or fentanyl, but have no pipe to smoke it in?

Don’t worry: local nonprofit organizations will hand you a brand-new crack pipe free of charge.

Just look for the door that says “Homeless Healthcare Los Angeles,” where addicts line up for free needles, glass pipes, smoking foils and other accessories to help them get high.

Homeless Healthcare LA is one of several organizations in California that give smoking accessories to anyone who wants them. That’s despite critics asserting there is no direct medical evidence that crack pipe giveaways stop the spread of disease.

And addicts told The Post that the free crack pipes help them afford more drugs to feed their habit.

During a recent visit to LA’s notorious Skid Row slum, The Post witnessed around a dozen people gathered outside Homeless Healthcare, most clutching matching glass pipes, which they all said were handed out by the organization.

Some stuffed them with fentanyl and lit up in broad daylight as volunteers ushered more people into the center.

Others, like Amiya Johnson, who lives on the street in Skid Row with his dog, kept them to sell or trade for more drugs.

“A lot of people trade this stuff for drugs when they get it,” Johnson said.

“Yeah, I sell ‘em,” his neighbor in line quipped, adding that he sells every glass pipe from the center for $2.

Danion Corral, who visits Homeless Healthcare most days, said he would still visit its Skid Row center even if it didn’t give out pipes.

Homeless Healthcare – which offers free coffee, snacks, rides to the doctor’s office and other services – would be a “haven of peace” for him and fellow addicts.

“This is the only place I can go to and get treated like a human being,” Corral said.

Danion Corral

The nonprofits handing out the pipes say it’s about “harm reduction” — effectively an “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” approach to the drug crisis.

What a beautiful city.

America truly is the best freedoms.

God bless our democracy.

]]> Mentally Ill Homeless Drug Addicts Plaguing Manhattan’s West Side, Terrorizing Tourists https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/08/05/mentally-ill-homeless-drug-addicts-plaguing-manhattans-west-side-terrorizing-tourists/ Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000

This seems like it’s bad for society.

These images are just ridiculous.

We are desensitized to them now, because this is all just normal, but come on.

New York Post:

Unstable, strung-out homeless weirdos have swarmed large parts of Manhattan’s West Side, littering streets with needles and menacing locals and tourists alike — and there’s no help in sight.

The invasion of homeless, mentally ill and drug-abusing people is a full-blown “humanitarian crisis” greeting millions of tourists and office workers who arrive in Midtown and its highly trafficked surrounding neighborhoods, wrote Councilman Eric Bottcher in a recent letter to the mayor asking for aid.

“Our neighborhoods need help right now,” he wrote. “The status quo cannot be allowed to continue.”

West Side wackadoos — including one dead-eyed junkie wandering with a needle sticking out of his hand along 36th Street near bustling Penn Station — were out in force as The Post visited the neighborhoods over the past two weeks.

A bedraggled security guard, who only gave Fisher as his name, said he sees doped-up derelicts do drugs “all day and all night” in the public courtyard at the Midtown Holiday Inn hotel along Eighth Avenue’s infamous “strip of despair.”

“It’s crazy out here,” the battle-weary Midtown security guard, 50, said.

“They even have sex out here on the benches. They pee and defecate here.”

Entire swaths of the West Side, including near Washington Square Park, the West Fourth Street subway station in the West Village and the Garment District, are “particularly dire,” Bottcher wrote.

I don’t think anyone can deny that this is Democrat official policy – they are pro “homeless street junkie mania.”

But JD Vance is weird.

Actually, JD Vance is really weird, and no one likes him, and it was a bizarre move to introduce him into the mix. The Democrats are right about that.

But being actively pro-junkie street mania is also weird.

No one likes this.

No one says “one of the things I really like about living here is all of the homeless junkies living on the streets and taking shits in public.”

What happened to “the taxpayer” as an entity that had some say in what is going on in the community?

]]> Manhattan to Attach Junkie Drug User Center to Elementary School https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/06/23/manhattan-to-attach-junkie-drug-user-center-to-elementary-school/ Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000

For decades, parents were demanding that their kindergarten sons be taught how to cut their dicks off and get fucked up the ass by adult men. The fascist white supremacist Christian theocracy was preventing small boys from learning this until 2014, when states began recommending “I am Jazz” be taught to kindergartners.

This is a book teaching boys to cut their dicks off.

Planned Parenthood, a group that helps families by killing infants, also provides important information to kids about how to chop that sucker off.

This is what they teach preschoolers:

It’s hard to believe that a mere ten years ago, the fascist Christian theocracy was preventing 5 year old boys from learning about how to cut their dicks off. It’s now taken for granted that every five year old should know to cut his dick off, and know how to get his asshole lubed up for a serious ramming.

Still, parents wonder: “why are my kids not being taught how to shoot up fentanyl by homeless people?”

You go to your kids’ elementary school and you look around and say: where are the homeless people teaching my small children how to intravenously inject opioids? This is supposed to be a center for education, not theocratic indoctrination by Christian white supremacists.

Finally, New York is providing the opportunity for elementary school kids to learn to do to hard drugs from homeless people.

New York Post:

The city is quietly planning to open a homeless shelter that could house junkies and ex-cons just five feet from the door of a lower Manhattan elementary school, The Post has learned.

The city Department of Social Services waited until June 13 to notify local elected officials and community board members of its controversial blueprint to convert a former Hampton Inn at 320 Pearl St. in the shadow of the South Street Seaport into a 106-bed “safe haven” shelter attached to the Peck Slip School.

It will be a “low-barrier” facility, meaning sobriety, criminal records and other obstacles typically used to screen residents for the neighborhood’s safety could be lifted.

Meanwhile, students and faculty begin summer break Wednesday, and the shelter is scheduled to open in the fall.

“They seem to want to push this through when no one is around,” raged a parent with a son in third grade. “We recognize that many neighborhoods have shelters – but not attached to a school.”

Now, just as kids will learn the necessary of cutting off their dicks and getting lubed up anally, they will be able to learn how to make sure their needles are clean.

We are trying to build a utopia here, folks.

Our democracy is always trying to be more perfect.

Our tranny five year olds need to know how to shoot up with clean needles.

How can we bring democracy to the Ukraine if we don’t have it here at home?

]]> Government Wants More Subsidies for Already Heavily Subsidized Marijuana Industry https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/06/15/government-wants-more-subsidies-for-already-heavily-subsidized-marijuana-industry/ Sat, 15 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Why would a country want its population to be high on drugs?

Can you think of reasons why that would be a goal of a government?

We might mention that the British used drugs as a weapon against the Chinese, literally dropping off pallets full of opium on the shores outside their villages.

The British were not subsidizing opium for their own citizens.

New York Post:

The marijuana industry is thriving. Last year the $21 billion industry grew by over 5%, faster than the U.S. economy as a whole. At the same time, states from California to Massachusetts have decided the industry needs to be subsidized. A coalition of Democratic senators is now calling for the Small Business Administration to come to the aid of the industry.

This is the same industry that, for decades, the U.S. government spent billions trying to snuff out. Illegal cannabis operations continued to thrive despite their efforts.

Yeah.

Wonder how that happened?

Does the US government selectively enforce laws? Because that would be a tyranny.

State governments have taken issue with the legal industry consisting of well-connected marijuana entrepreneurs that have pushed out minorities who were most-commonly prosecuted for cannabis crimes. New York established a $200 million fund for minority marijuana marketers. Michigan is a relative piker, giving $1 million in grants to help with “social equity funding.”

That is really, really funny.

“Drug dealing used to be a black industry, but now that we legalized drugs, the blacks don’t have opportunities to be involved in the lucrative drug dealing industry.”

This is like if the EU legalized organ trafficking and then started sending extra aid to occupied Kosovo.

New Jersey chipped in $12 million last year, “The Cannabis Equity Grant Program allows us to simultaneously expand the pool of cannabis businesses in our state while also focusing on those communities most impacted by the unethical War on Drugs,” Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy said. Colorado launched a similar program the same year. Pot convicts will get grants funded by Washington state to launch their businesses.

In other cases, states have heavily regulated and taxed the market, often producing unworkable rules that industry operators have said stifle it. That’s why California funded a $100 million bailout in 2021 for marijuana companies burdened by rules that have led users back to illegal dealers. Pot retailers got another $20 million boost in 2023.

…

Massachusetts paid $27 million in grants to licensed operators, but the marijuana industry wanted more. The grants weren’t big enough to “help any business survive,” Sean Hope, who owns a Cambridge pot business called “Yamba,” told CommonWealth Beacon.

This is all cartoonish.

What kind of country is this?

Legalized drug dealers now demand the government give them free money? And the government does it?

Why would the government be giving any business free money? In theory, all of that money comes from taxes on other businesses.

Is this level of social engineering sustainable?

]]> Canada: Old People Having Psychotic Breakdowns Due to Legal Ultra-Weed https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/05/21/canada-old-people-having-psychotic-breakdowns-due-to-legal-ultra-weed/ Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000
“I have all my fingers today. I think we should get fucked up and do insane crimes. What do you think, voice in my head?”

Related: Justice Department Reclassifies Marijuana as a Less Dangerous Drug

It’s so funny that in the 1960s everyone was like “weeds not a big deal, man, just legalize it!”

And then they legalized it and a bunch of botanic scientists started messing with it and turned it into a seriously hardcore drug that makes you go insane.

Personally, I think it was a bit out of control to be putting people in prison for a few grams of weed. I don’t support the extreme drug war policies, even though I am a hardcore Nixon supporter. I think it should have been suppressed to an extent, but putting people in prison was just kind of nuts.

But legalizing it and then letting these scientists turn it into a hardcore psychedelic that drives everyone into schizophrenia? This is totally wild. At best, they could have just decriminalized possession.

But hey.

Making super-weed that makes everyone schizophrenic is also a good option, I guess.

CNN:

One may think young people are the main group enjoying the freedom of legalized weed, but in Canada, the greatest increase in users after legalization was among older adults — and sometimes it’s sending them to the hospital, according to new research.

The rate of emergency department visits for cannabis poisoning in older adults during the period of legalization of dried cannabis flower and edibles — October 2018 through December 2022 — in Canada was significantly higher than that of the pre-legalization period, according to a research letter published Monday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Oh wow so legalizing drugs makes more people do drugs huh I never would have supposed that this would be the case. [sic]

Edibles, which include baked goods, candies and beverages, are increasingly popular, said lead research author Dr. Nathan Stall, a geriatrician and clinician scientist at Sinai Health in Ontario. But some older adults may be unaware of the strength of today’s weed, and little is known about the health effects of legalizing edible cannabis on older adults — the age group with the largest growth in overall cannabis use a year after dried cannabis flower was legalized in Canada, Stall said.

“There’s a bit of an age-related bias that many health care practitioners, and frankly society, hold that older adults are not using drugs. And that’s not true,” Stall said. “We found that the largest increases in emergency department visits for cannabis poisoning among seniors occurred after edible cannabis became legal for retail sale in January 2020.”

These “edibles” are like, super-strong. People have complete breakdowns. It’s like smoking PCP.

The authors used the Ontario Ministry of Health’s administrative data to examine the rates of emergency room visits for cannabis poisoning among older adults during the pre-legalization period — January 2015 to September 2018 — and the two legalization periods: October 2018 through December 2019, which permitted the sale of dried cannabis flower only, and January 2020 through December 2022, which marked the legalization of cannabis edibles.

When people have cannabis poisoning, according to Stall, they may experience confusion; psychosis, including hallucinations; anxiety or panic attacks; rapid heartbeat; chest pain; nausea; and vomiting.

To be fair, you don’t have to smoke weed to have those issues.

I have all those issues every day and I haven’t smoked weed since I was 19.

During the eight-year study period, there were 2,322 emergency department visits for cannabis poisoning in older adults who were age 69 on average. Nearly 17% of those adults were simultaneously intoxicated with alcohol, about 38% had cancer and 6.5% had dementia. Compared with pre-legalization, legalization period No. 1 saw a twice higher rate of emergency department visits for cannabis poisoning. The rate during the second legalization period tripled that of pre-legalization.

“This study provides a cautionary tale of legalization of substances without adequate research, education, and counseling of users regarding adverse effects and safe usage, particularly in older adults,” said Dr. Lona Mody and Dr. Sharon K. Inouye, who weren’t involved in the research, in a commentary on the research.

It needs to be de-legalized.

It was already effectively decriminalized. What was the point of legalizing it?

If it’s decriminalized but still illegal, it can’t be sold in shops, and people don’t think it’s normal and sanctioned by the government, so people are more careful.

It’s just common sense.

]]> Justice Department Reclassifies Marijuana as a Less Dangerous Drug https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/05/17/justice-department-reclassifies-marijuana-as-a-less-dangerous-drug/ Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana.

So today, the @TheJusticeDept is taking the next step to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug under federal law.

Here’s what that means: pic.twitter.com/TMztSyyFYm

— President Biden (@POTUS) May 16, 2024

Marijuana is a more dangerous drug. Since they legalized it, it is like 100x stronger than it was in the 1990s.

People are having psychotic episodes and developing schizophrenia because of weed.

Why does the government want everyone to be on drugs? Is it because people on drugs are not going to resist their lunatic agenda?

New York Post:

The Justice Department on Thursday formally moved to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in a historic shift in generations of US drug policy.

A proposed rule sent to the federal register recognizes the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledges it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs.

The plan approved by Attorney General Merrick Garland does not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use.

The Drug Enforcement Administration will take public comment on the proposal to move marijuana away from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD.

It moves pot to Schedule III, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids.

The move comes after a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department, which launched a review of the drug’s status at the urging of President Joe Biden in 2022.

Biden also has moved to pardon thousands of people convicted federally of simple possession of marijuana and has called on governors and local leaders to take similar steps to erase convictions.

“This is monumental,” Biden said in a video statement, calling it an important move toward reversing longstanding inequities. “Far too many lives have been upended because of a failed approach to marijuana, and I’m committed to righting those wrongs. You have my word on it.”

The Justice Department is run by the Jews, by the way.

The Jews want you on drugs. They also want you fat. They do not want you sharp of mind and body.

A sharp people are a dangerous people.

The Jews want you as weak as possible.

]]>