Above is Tuesday’s top headline on the formerly right-wing website, The Drudge Report. The headline links to a Reuters article making the stated claim that everything is normal now in Israel for people who have been vaccinated.

Matt Drudge is a Jew, and he’s telling people that Israel is an example of people going back to normal life after being vaccinated.

Matt Drudge

We’ve already been told that there is no way for this to end with just one or two vaccines because new strains of the alleged virus keep appearing, potentially rendering previous vaccinations useless.

We also know that people who have been vaccinated in the West are told to continue wearing masks. Anthony Fauci has said nothing can go back to normal until everyone on earth is vaccinated in 2025.

Israel is a Potemkin village, designed to make people believe in the mythology of the vaccination cult.

The Jew Neri Zilber (who is probably Israeli) writes for The Daily Beast:

The text message came in early Sunday morning from an Israeli friend with a question in Hebrew (and most other languages) that hadn’t been posed in months: “We going out tonight?”

After a full year of pandemic and repeat lockdowns, the second of which in September shuttered all of Israel’s—and go-go Tel Aviv’s—restaurants and bars and cafes, the country almost fully reopened yesterday on the back of its globe-leading COVID vaccination campaign. The locals, for their part, took full advantage and went out in force.

“Back to life, first in the world,” long-serving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu crowed from a cafe during a live Facebook broadcast over cappuccino and cake. “First” was a loose concept: many countries, especially in East Asia and Oceania, never even closed or are already open after driving infection rates down to zero.

(Many third world countries didn’t close because they didn’t do mass PCR hoax testing and therefore there was no “evidence” of a virus.)

But for most other countries in the world similarly hard-hit by the coronavirus, Israel is indeed a test case for how to get our lives back—thanks to the vaccines—and what such a life may look like. On the basis of the first night out in Tel Aviv, it’s definitely celebratory, decidedly surreal, and deceptively normal—bordering on reckless.

On central Tel Aviv’s Dizengoff Street, home to high-end shopping and many low-end bars, the scene Sunday evening was of a massive party: balloons tied to awnings, people walking on sidewalks with beers, and young revelers overflowing from most drinking establishments as electronic music played.

At one such bar, Fasada, a table of 10 friends, all in their late twenties, were sipping red wine and beers, catching each other up on life and work and romances. Next to them were two guys industriously rolling and smoking joints, worried more about quotidian concerns like a dropped piece of pizza. Nearby, three girlfriends worked on a bottle of white wine together as they eyed the crowd.

“It’s wonderful to be back,” Sapir, 28, the waitress, told me, beaming. “This is what Tel Aviv used to be like.”

Seemingly the only allowances for the unpleasantness of the past year were the masks hanging below some chins and tables more spaced out than usual. A big part of the government’s reopening plan is tied to the “Green Passport” scheme for all those vaccinated or recovered from COVID.

There is nonstop propaganda about Israel right now, claiming that this is the model for the world. It’s all through the media. This makes it obvious that the media is planning to do for the whole world what Israel has done: coerced vaccinations and an internal passport.

It makes sense that they would do this in Israel first, as Israel was already a totally militarized police state, and they are also planned to be the center of this global new world order system, which is going to be based on a new religion that will “combine all of the religions,” and will be centered on a kind of new age Gaia earth-worship cult tied in with global warming (and possibly/probably space aliens).

But the fact is, the rest of us have a long way to go before we reach the “new normal” of Israel. Even if that were desirable.

Related: Anti-Pope Visits Middle East for Satanic Ceremony at Ancient Sumerian Temple

As some do know and all should know, Revolver.News has been filling the hole left by the Drudge Report, which has gone full progressive-Jewish. I think it’s a fantastic site. It has a great link dump and the original analysis pieces are good enough that I read them.

The site is being promoted by Tucker Carlson, which is fantastic, and means that we’re going to be building a base of good places for people to go and get the truth as the media continues to get worse and worse.

Revolver is promoting itself as “the New Drudge,” and Tucker has said as much on air several times.

But there is a problem. When I go to Revolver.News, this is what I see when the page loads:

If I click pagedown once, I get this.

A total of four articles are visible within the first two whole pages. Three of them are Revolver exclusives, which are, as they say, “long reads.”

Now, let’s compare that to Drudge, which Revolver views as direct competition.

The first page has an entire link dump relating to the top story. Only one story has a big image and is highlighted as a “top story.” The beginning of the headline dump is visible at the bottom.

Then, by the time you reach the second page, you are into the full link dump.

It’s nothing but links, with a few images in the mix to spice things up.

A person goes to Drudge because they like the format. Probably, they like simply scanning the headlines, quickly, and many of them don’t even bother clicking the articles most of the time.

If Revolver wants to take the audience of Drudge Report, then the site needs to function more like Drudge Report.

The general aesthetics of the site are fine, in terms of the font and color scheme, and I also like the way tweets are embedded in-line. Basically, it just needs to have more links visible as soon as the page is visited.

The exclusive articles should be prominent, but it should be understood that the biggest group of people who goes to a site goes there to read headlines. That’s true of any news site. People like to see a bunch of headlines at once, and have the opportunity to click some of them if they want to know more.

Drudge occasionally puts exclusive articles on the site, usually in the middle column, so they are prominent, but also embedded in the larger scheme of daily news items.

Further, I would not totally copy Drudge, because the three column look is very dated, and it doesn’t look right on cellphones.

The fact of reality is that a lot of money has been spent A/B testing news sites, so anyone who is building a news site should go and look at the layouts of the top 20 news websites, and copy the elements that appear across all sites. The only big news site that I’m aware of which sometimes only has one main story on the opening page is the Daily Mail.

Note that this is one story, but it is still a sensory overload. And as soon as you click “pagedown,” you’re barraged with all kinds of stories.

I’m analyzing the presentation of Revolver News here because I think it is a very important news site right now, and I’m sure someone will link this analysis to them and it will hit them like, “duh.” But these principles would obviously also apply to anyone else who is currently running or thinking about running a news site.

It’s something that I do encourage. I try my best here to put out information and talking points, but I feel very strongly that there should be an entire ecosystem of right-wing sites. I don’t really feel that we here at DS have competition, given that we are guaranteed to be a fringe site due to the amount of censorship, and that we will only ever be read by an intelligentsia. The masses of people need sites like Revolver.

There is an opening for this sort of thing coming up, as Fox News is going full leftist, and Breitbart is a completely useless partisan politics site that is utterly sycophantic towards Donald Trump.

I will say that in terms of content, Revolver is currently the best regularly updated news site this side of the one you are reading now, and if you are looking for a site to send to friends that you think would be turned off by DS, I highly recommend you send them there. I don’t really know anything about the people running it, but Tucker Carlson seems to think they’re alright, and that’s good enough for me.

Tucker Carlson last week addressed the most bizarre issue of the emergent New World Order in America: that Matt Drudge sprung upon Donald Trump with an entire new format for his website. Having been a right-winger for nearly 30 years, he decided to become a radical leftist.

It’s almost like he was undercover for those decades.

Maybe it wasn’t a good idea to put a homosexual Jew in such a prominent place in the right-wing media sphere, huh? It’s almost like you can’t really trust these people, maybe?

We have thousands of years with the Jews, since they murdered our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, but for some reason, idiot right-wingers still haven’t caught onto the fact that these people are simply bad news.

I don’t like to promote my competitors, but Tucker mentions that many refugees from the Drudge Report who are unhappy with his new Jewish message have since started reading Revolver News for all of their link-dump needs. It seems like a pretty good site. They have a great piece up now about how the Justice Department is resisting pressing charges against the rioters (it seems to be directly based on my work, which is certainly something I love to see).

I hope it’s not run by Jews or homosexuals.

President Trump is whining about Fox News attacking him again.

Don’t get why @FoxNews puts losers on like @RepSwalwell (who got ZERO as presidential candidate before quitting), Pramila Jayapal, David Cicilline and others who are Radical Left Haters? The Dems wouldn’t let @FoxNews get near their bad ratings debates, yet Fox panders. Pathetic!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 8, 2019

He’s also allegedly complaining about the Jew Matt Drudge turning against him, and is allegedly sending his Jew son-in-law to speak to that Jew.

Daily Beast:

As House lawmakers move quickly toward a likely impeachment vote before the year’s end, President Donald Trump has kept a close eye on his conservative media allies—and hasn’t been shy about trashing them for projecting insufficient fealty.

But it’s been one media outlet in particular that has caught the president’s ire, even though it has so far been spared his Twitter rage: the Drudge Report. Publicly, Trump hasn’t said a peep about the highly popular news aggregator run by right-wing media impresario Matt Drudge. But privately, he has simmered over the critical coverage that the site has run and linked to, with regards to the impeachment proceedings.

“What’s going on with Drudge?” Trump has been asking allies since Democratic lawmakers launched the impeachment probe in late September, according to a person with knowledge of his private remarks. Two other sources who’ve heard the president complain told The Daily Beast that Trump has asked those close to him why they think Drudge and his website have seemed “so anti-Trump” lately.

Of course, seeing this I cannot help but throw everything on my desk onto the floor and smash my fan against the wall.

Trump had a literal army of media people who were much more relevant to the culture than Fox News or Matt Drudge, and he allowed them all to be silenced.

The list of now-banned people who supported Donald Trump in 2016 is too long to list.

But they include:

• Daily Stormer
• Alex Jones
• Gavin McInnes
• MILO
• James O’Keefe

And literally tens of thousands of other people who have had their First Amendment rights stripped from them by a conspiracy of tech monopolies.

Daily Stormer was the first major news site to endorse Trump, doing so immediately after he called Mexicans rapists. And that is partially why we’ve been the most banned of anyone.

If it was not for this smothering attack on alternative media, no one would even be thinking about Fox News or Drudge. The media engaged in this conspiracy, calling for us to be silenced, claiming we are “dangerous,” so that they could have a complete and total lockdown on the distribution of information.

In the month before I had my website stolen from me, I had six million readers. And it would have been going up, up, up. As it is now, we’ve struggled to get back to half of that. Two years later.

All Trump had to do was enforce the law. There are all kinds of ways this could have been done, including by FCC decree. But instead, he let this happen to all of us, remained quiet, then held a social media censorship conference with a bunch of people who aren’t even censored – including the bastard Charlie Kirk who is in the process of destroying Trump’s presidency.

This is an “unforced error” extravaganza with this guy.

And it enrages me. It certainly appears that if it were not for my support for Donald Trump, I never would have been banned. Certainly that is the case with Alex Jones. They brought up this Sandy Hook stuff five years after he’d said it to silence him.

Meanwhile, the great villain Richard Spencer has not been censored on any platform – one has to imagine the fact that he is actively against Trump, going so far as to shill against him on CNN, is the primary reason for this.

The fact of reality is that Trump had a massive machine supporting him that would be 20 times the size it was in 2016 if he’d done something to preserve it. But he didn’t lift a finger.

And now here we are.

It’s lunacy.

This is called “painting a target on someone’s back.”

On Sunday, Our Young Hero Nick Fuentes was featured on the Drudge Report front page.

Right underneath the top line, which was some silly nonsense about the stupid impeachment thing that no one cares about.

Do you hear that? It's the sound of Kirk screaming. pic.twitter.com/vcT3ISeS6a

— Mister AntiBully (@MisterAntiBully) November 18, 2019

Right there: his face.

The face of the protagonist, the face of the little Mexican boy who came to save America from the Jews.

You should have seen my face.

As is the way of the Drudge – which, let me remind you, is a Jewish publication – there were two links below the face of our hero.

The first was from The Hill.

And what did it say?

Nothing good, I can tell you that.

The Hill:

A fringe group of far-right activists have been disrupting conservative and pro-Trump events in recent weeks, drawing rebukes from mainstream Republicans who are eager to separate the party from white nationalists and alt-right racists.

Count those trigger words in that lede, nigger.

You’re gonna have to count them, for serious, because I can’t count that high.

A small but vocal group of young men led by 21-year-old broadcaster Nicholas Fuentes received national attention this week after heckling Donald Trump Jr. at an event in California, where he was promoting his new book “Triggered.”

Fuentes and others on the far right have been publishing calendars of events held by Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, conservative media stars Ben Shapiro and David Rubin and others, including Trump Jr. and Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), in an effort to have their followers infiltrate and disrupt the events.

“Infiltrate and disrupt” is a codeword for “go to the events and ask questions at the Q&A.”

But wait – here’s a non-defamatory sentence.

The alt-right activists view Kirk and Shapiro as insufficiently conservative on issues like immigration and claim to be carrying the mantle for President Trump. Members often show up at the events wearing red Make America Great Again hats and Fuentes’s show is called “America First” in a nod to the president’s popular slogan.

Shapiro, who is Jewish, and others have described the disruptions as an insidious effort to smuggle racist and anti-Semitic ideologies into the conservative mainstream.

At a speech at Stanford University this week, Shapiro lashed out at Fuentes, calling him a “garbage human being” whose views are “obviously white supremacist garbage.”

Shapiro did not call out Fuentes by name, as he and others are worried that fighting back will elevate the fringe group and give them more attention than they deserve.

But it was clear that Shapiro was directing his fire at Fuentes, whom he characterized as the leader of the next wave of the alt-right movement.

“Some call themselves ‘America First’ to hijack President Trump’s slogans to give themselves a patina of credibility … you’re seeing them adopt the beliefs of some of these other movements in order to find cover for their own vile belief system,” Shapiro said.

Fuentes’s followers are called “Groypers” and identify themselves with the image of a fat, green frog, who looks similar to the original alt-right “Pepe” character.

IT’S A TOAD, BITCH!

Fuentes’s YouTube show has been a factory for bigoted, anti-Semitic and racist content.

The 21-year old attended the “Unite the Right” white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, and later posted on his Facebook page: “The ruthless transnational elite know a tidal wave of white identity is coming and know that once the word gets out they will not be able to stop us. The fire rises.”

Fuentes has lashed out at Rubin, the conservative YouTube star, who is Jewish and gay.

“You want to talk to Jewy Jewstein?,” Fuentes said. “I’m David Rubin and this is the gay Jewish show. Today we’ve got a Jew.”

And in another anti-Semitic segment, Fuentes questioned whether the Holocaust took place, while likening the burning bodies of Jews to cookies baking in an oven.

That’s when the fire REALLY rises – when you stack bodies 20 high and burn them in the open air in a field using wood.

But seriously… why is this article talking about this? It is a new article about how there is a group of young conservatives who are dissatisfied with the establishment, or is it an examination of thousands of hours of Nick Fuentes content in search of the naughty words?

In an interview with The Hill, Fuentes insisted that he is not racist, anti-Semitic or a white nationalist. Fuentes said he believes that the Holocaust did take place and that the “cookies” bit was said for shock value.

“I’ve never advocated for a white ethno-state,” Fuentes said. “Multiracialism is here and we have to live with it and [the question is] how will we do that?”

Fuentes said that in hindsight, he probably would not have gone to the Charlottesville rally if he had known it would be co-opted by David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a white supremacist and neo-Nazi.

He said that some of his remarks are meant as outrage trolling to draw attention to his show or as over-the-top digs at political rivals aimed at getting under their skin.

“That’s kind of the whole thing,” he said. “We have figured out the game. The algorithm. We’ve hacked the conversation where if you say sensational things like we do, you get attention. I don’t want it to be like that. I wish I could ascend with ideas.”

To the surprise of some longtime conservative media figures, Fuentes’s cause has found an ally in Michelle Malkin, the former Fox News contributor. Malkin did not return a request for comment.

But for the most part, conservative media has been sounding the alarm about the need for the party to banish Fuentes and his followers.

BANISH!

What does it mean???

Will they run him out of town on a rail???

We are an army! Look at our numbers!

“[Fuentes] and his followers are scum of the earth and their bad faith, anti-Semitic attacks should be shot down by the entire conservative movement,” Republican strategist Caleb Hull said on Twitter.

The Trump Jr. protests received media attention for what many viewed as a delicious irony — the president’s son being shouted down by right-wing protesters, although the story changed once it became clear that these were not mainstream conservatives.

Fuentes said that he has no issues with Trump Jr., but rather that he’s trying to get the president and his family to see Kirk as a conservative fraud.

And then catch this: The Hill totally reframes the Crenshaw threat to dox and ruin the lives of the Groypers, getting a quote from him saying he “felt sorry” for them.

After the “Groypers” confronted Crenshaw at a public event in Arizona, the congressman said that he felt sorry for the young protesters.

Crenshaw predicted they would grow up to regret having been captured forever on video and revealed as racists.

“This is the alt right 2.0 because the alt right was discredited,” Crenshaw said. “So what they do is try to cloak themselves in some logical nationalism or MAGA-hat wearing America First rhetoric, which a lot of conservatives agree with, and then they use that to cloak their anti-Semitic leanings, and their racist leanings, and it’s pretty gross. You’re going to regret this.”

That is not what happened.

We have video of what happened.

These boys were saying that they disagreed with sending all of these billions to Israel, and Crenshaw said “you’ll regret this.”

It’s on video!

You can’t fool us, The Hill!

We know what he meant! That was a threat by a sitting Congressman against college kids who disagree with American foreign policy!

None of this has anything to do with “racism”!

It’s a hoax!

The Other Article Drudge Linked

The second article at the top of Drudge next to Nick Fuentes’ face was from The Washington Post.

It was basically the same exactly thing. Except maybe it wasn’t quite as bad as The Hill version. Though it had all the same slurs.

From it:

At stake, analysts say, is how President Donald Trump’s youngest voters define Trumpism. Will they embrace white nationalism and similar far-right causes – or reject them?

“Part of this is an internecine war within conservatism,” said Nicole Hemmer, a Columbia University scholar and author of “Messengers of the Right,” a 2016 book on conservative media. “Who is the true follower of Donald Trump? That’s the fight you’re seeing.”

Fuentes, a Boston University dropout who lives in the Chicago suburbs, has emerged as a champion of those on the right who believe mainstream conservatism – in their words, “Conservative Inc.” – has gone astray. He attended the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, but denies he is a neo-Nazi or a white nationalist.

On his “America First” YouTube show, Fuentes espouses “demographic realism.” That means he takes the hardest line possible against immigration: “We’re slamming the door so hard that people’s faces are shattering,” Fuentes says. He also expresses fear about what will happen to America as its population becomes much less white – “dramatic and radical change,” he says, “that will come with not insignificant consequences and not all of them good.”

That is a good, fair quote, I think. It’s surrounded by all the slurs and defamation, but it is a good quote by itself.

Fuentes on his Internet show denounces same-sex marriage and “transgenderism” as “deviancy,” and he questions U.S. foreign aid to Israel. In January, Fuentes likened the Holocaust to a cookie-baking operation led by the Cookie Monster in a video monologue that implied he questions the death toll of 6 million Jews.

…

Fuentes said he is Catholic and that his ethnic background includes Mexican heritage through his father’s ancestors. In a video after the August shootings in El Paso, Texas, that left 22 dead, including Mexicans and Mexican-Americans, Fuentes declared: “The easiest way for Mexicans to not get shot and killed in Walmart is for them to not [expletive] be here.”

Asked about that statement and others, Fuentes said in an email: “I don’t feel compelled to explain every ‘shocking’ phrase I’ve uttered in the over 1,000 hours of content I’ve produced in the span of four years. It’s kind of missing the point.”

His show’s audience, Fuentes said, is “zoomers,” those born after the mid-1990s in what is known as “Generation Z.”

…

Reveling in the attention he has received lately, Fuentes cheers those who call themselves “Groypers” – the name of a far-right meme based on a cartoon toad – and troll prominent conservatives. Shapiro is one target. Another is Charlie Kirk, founder of the conservative student network Turning Point USA, who moderated the Nov. 10 event at UCLA with Trump Jr.

Turning Point declined to comment on Fuentes.

Kirk wrote Thursday on Twitter: “Ethno-nationalism is Un-American. It has NO place in the conservative movement.” Trump Jr. retweeted another Kirk statement denouncing white supremacists who came to a Turning Point event.

Fuentes said he supports the president and Trump Jr. but not Kirk.

…

Thomas Main, a professor of public and international affairs at Baruch College and author of a book on the alt-right, said the vocabulary of such fringe movements is in constant flux.

Participants tend to “put everything ironically and knowingly,” he said, “so the outsiders have difficulty knowing what’s going on.” But those participants also crave attention, especially on college campuses. When they get noticed, Main said, they say to themselves: “Hey, if I’m outraging everybody, I must be doing something right.”

Yeah, if your enemies are outraged, you’re doing something right.

How could that be controversial?

Hey King, Keep Your Head Up

Journalist: Are you racist or anti Semitic?

Me: No

[next day]

Headline: RACIST, ANTI SEMITE NICK FUENTES

How is this legal? It’s just willful, malicious lying. pic.twitter.com/1eZuvBoudO

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) November 17, 2019

Nick:

As you know, you are now way past Charlie Kirk and his people coming at you.

This is how the system works. I led a succes campaign to expose TPUSA's open borders agenda and hold Charlie Kirk accountable, and now they pull out all the old "bombshell" soundbites & send them to the brand ambassadors on their payroll for the big hitjob, it's so transparent.

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) November 18, 2019

The entire establishment – both left and right – is now on you, and is going to do everything they can to destroy you.

This right now is them painting a target on your back. This is “Get Fuentes.”

The whole world is about to come down on you, like nothing you can even begin to imagine.

They are going to go after every member of your family. Not just your immediately family, but your extended family. They are going to stalk basically everyone you know. They will use journalists to do this, but it will be purely for intimidation purposes.

They will park cars outside of the homes of your family members. They will come up on property and look into windows. And there isn’t really anything you can do about it.

So, get ready.

Tell your family. Your whole family. And anyone else you know. They’re also going to go through everyone you knew in high school, and they will find people to lie about you.

So I mean. Just get ready for that. It is coming right now. And it is going to be emotionally difficult, even with your particular disposition.

But God will help you through it, and I’ve no doubt you’ll manage.

All it means is that you’re winning.

It is destiny.

The government is going to regulate the internet.

And we will be given our freedoms back.

Washington Examiner:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes condemned Twitter on Sunday for continuing to apply a layer of censorship on the Drudge Report.

About two months after the California Republican raised the alarm about Drudge Report “being censored by Twitter,” Nunes again nailed the social media platform for putting up a wall separating users from the top right-leaning news aggregator. “I just looked on Twitter,” Nunes said on “Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo.” “The Drudge Report is being censored today, so for the last three or four days I haven’t been able to get on the Drudge Report because it’s being censored on Twitter.”

He connected the issue to the larger issue of censorship and bias conservatives face in the technology arena, days after a Google search showed the word “Nazism” in an information box about the California Republican Party’s ideology. “So this censorship of conservatives and Republicans and conservative values continues in this country and here in California we’re on the front lines,” he added.

Asked what exactly is going on with Nunes’ attempts to click on Drudge Report tweets, a top right-leaning news aggregator, a spokesman for the congressman told the Washington Examiner that he is seeing a message saying that they are blocked due to potentially “sensitive content.”

It doesn’t matter if it’s the Drudge Report being discussed.

It doesn’t matter who is discussed.

This is just starting the conversation.

This is all or nothing – either we are going to get free speech on the internet, or these monopoly companies are going to censor everyone to the right of Bernie.

We might not be going back to the golden age of 2015 – Twitter probably will have “harassment” rules.

But we will be given amnesty.

We will be able to speak freely on these platforms. Even me.

And this whole shit with my stolen domain – that’s all going to end.

Judgement Day comes to Silicon Valley.

So this is at the top of Drudge Report right now:

See that the “conservative” homosexual Jew Matt Drudge uses the preferred Jewish spelling of Christmas – “XMAS.”

I remember when I was a kid, Christians were saying that “XMAS” meant crossing out Christ from Christmas. As I’ve researched it, this does not appear to be the original intent. However, it has been adopted by Jews as their means to refer to the holiday and not use the world “Christ,” which is literally physically painful for them to say or write. And they will say it aloud as “ex-mas” to avoid saying the word “Christ.”

Matt Drudge also went on a Jewish Jihad against Judge Roy Moore while even mainstream conservative outlets (Fox News) were supporting him. He was fully behind the entire jailbait hoax, and went so far as to promote Ivanka’s “child abusers go to hell” statements.

Yes, Drudge played a role in bringing down Bill Clinton decades ago, but in the age of Trump, his Jewishness is showing. I notice all sorts of counter-American messages on this site now. I’ve largely stopped even checking it over the last year or so.

Drudge is a Jew and a homosexual, two conditions which prohibit him from being a good or honest person. So I warn you: keep an eye on this one.

Druge Report’s top headline right now:

The link is to an article from the Daily Mail:

A US-based Turkish cleric accused of plotting a coup to overthrow the Ankara government has claimed President Recep Erdogan staged the rebellion himself to justify a major clampdown on opposition forces.

Fethullah Gulen, who was a former key ally of Erdogan has been blamed by the politician of using his contacts to develop a ‘parallel structure’ to overthrow the state.

Erdogan has called on US President Barack Obama to extradite Gulen, who is based in Pennsylvania.

…

Speaking from his home, Gulen claimed democracy in Turkey could not be achieved through military action.

He condemned the plot, although authorities in Ankara are not convinced.

He said: ‘There is a slight chance, there is a possibility that it could be a staged coup. It could be meant for court accusations and associations.’

He added: ‘It appears that they have no tolerance for any movement, any group, any organisation that is not under their total control.’

President Erdogan told a crowd chanting for the death penalty on Saturday that such demands may be discussed in parliament after a coup attempt by a faction in the military killed at least 161 people.

Looking relaxed and smiling, giving an occasional thumbs up to his supporters in Istanbul, Erdogan said the coup attempt had been carried out by a minority in the army.

He said: ‘The army is ours, not that of the parallel structure. I am chief commander.’

Earlier Erdogan urged the US to extradite Gulen claiming Turkey never turned down an extradition request from Washington for ‘terrorists’.

I am all but entirely convinced the coup was indeed faked by Erdogan for the purpose of solidifying power and purging remaining distasteful elements.

His popularity had been waning.

In June of last year, Erdogan’s party lost its majority in the Parliament, gaining only 40.87% of the vote. Erdogan called a snap election, due to the hung parliament, and in November got 49.50% of the vote, reestablishing his majority. This change presumably brought about through devious methods.

Over the last year, Turkey has been repeatedly attacked by ISIS, and people have been getting upset that Erdogan is supporting the terrorists which are attacking the country. His support was decreasing due to frustrations with his support of terrorism.

The coup made him a hero.

Other Options

Though Erdogan staging his own coup may sound like a nutty conspiracy theory, it in fact makes much more sense than any other possibility.

And all of the possibilities are necessarily conspiracies, none of which have been supported by any sort of evidence thus far.

Let’s look at the others.

Fethullah Gulen Conspiracy

Erdogan and Gulen, BFF in the 90s.

The assertion of Erdogan, as shown above, is that an Islamic cleric and member of his own party staged the coup in order to install a different form of Islamic regime.

Thus far, Erdogan has produced zero evidence to support this theory, and made the claim without any apparent rationale, beyond noting that Gulen is against him.

Gulen is an associate of Hillary Clinton, meaning if the Gulen conspiracy is true, it would have probably been approved by the US government.

Which brings us to option two, which is an extension of option one.

US/Western/Jew Conspiracy

The coup was done so poorly, that it is impossible for me to believe the West and/or the Jews could have orchestrated it.

Coup 101 is to capture the leader. They did the coup when he was on vacation, didn’t even attempt to capture him. Second thing is to capture the media, which they failed to do. Next thing is to not attack civilians, which they failed to do. Next thing is to announce a new leader, which they failed to do.

None of the basic elements of a successful coup were present, which basically says it had to have been intended to fail, or done by someone with no idea what they were doing.

Worst. Coup. Ever.

Gulen could potentially have had no idea what he was doing, but he couldn’t have gotten away with planning it without the US government being aware of it. He would have been under surveillance. Also, he is working with the US, meaning he wouldn’t have a reason to attack their ally, despite the apparent disagreements with Turkey.

If the US agrees to Erdogan’s request to extradite Gulan, it will make it much more likely that Gulen acted alone.

We also have the fact that Turkey is an ally of the US, Israel and the EU, and that they would have absolutely nothing to gain by ousting their own ally to install someone who is less pro-terrorism. Turkey is the staging base for the war against Assad, and is actively supporting the “rebels.” Turkey is also a close ally of Israel, selling them oil gathered in Syria by the terrorists. Israel is also extremely pro-invasion of Europe, which Erdogan is facilitating.

However, a theorist could come up with some convoluted reason why the West would want to oust Erdogan. What they could not come up with is an explanation of why the West would throw a coup that had an absolute zero chance of being successful, due to the most basic idiocy, while also knowing that if it were to fail, it would have the opposite effect, bolstering Erdogan in the extreme.

Russian/Other Conspiracy

When I first saw the news of the coup, my hope was that Russia had stirred-up anti-Erdogan, anti-ISIS secular forces in the country for their own purposes – that this was both revenge for Turkish aggression against them and a move against NATO.

Obviously, this was not the case, as Russia would not do anything so sloppy. They would be even less likely than the West to launch this retard-tier fail-coup.

As far as “other” – maybe some other options exist, I don’t know what they are.

It wasn’t the secular elements of the military, or the higher-ups would have come out and supported the coup. Instead, they were apparently completely silent throughout the coup, not even ordering the ones throwing the coup to stand down. Note that these top officials are not being repremanded for not ordering the military to stand-down, even when they presumably could have done this and ended the coup a few hours earlier (because the soldiers themselves didn’t understand what was even happening, they would have listened to a higher official).

And So

Considering that no hard evidence exists supporting any of these theories and probably never will, we are left to simply draw conclusions based on what we do know.

And the absolute simplest answer is that Erdogan staged it himself. There is not one single fact or angle that I am able to find which does not jive with this conclusion.

This is not an Alex Jones type theory, by the way. He often takes an established narrative and tries to deconstruct it with various irrelevant or pseudo-relevant pieces of information or disinformation. Sometimes he ends up being right – such as with claiming that ISIS was a proxy of the West – and sometimes he is wrong – such as with claiming Donald Trump was hired by Hillary Clinton to bring down Rand Paul. But the pattern is always simply to find an outrageous angle, then find the facts to fit it.

In this case, there is no narrative to go against. None has been established, as of yet. From what I’ve read today – and I’ve read quite a bit – the Western media is sort of going along with the Erdogan theory about Gulen, but at the same time they’re not really strongly endorsing it, and sometimes appearing sympathetic to Gulen.

If the West did do it absolutely retarded coup which would be the textbook example how to fail at a coup with the intent of having it be successful, they will have to blame someone else. Presumably then, they would blame Erdogan himself. But the media clearly has not received a direction on this, and Kerry has been extremely hesitant to even comment on anything.

So, my assertion is the most simple explanation for this very weird event, and I think that the rest of the alternative media commenters are going to come out and agree with me on this. I was bold, being the first one to say it, and I’ve had a lot disagreeing, but I believe I will be vindicated.

And if I’m proven wrong, and Erdogan is proven right, then so be it. I may well be wrong. However, until further evidence emerges, basic logic can only lead to the conclusion I have drawn.